34
Session 7: Internal Audit planning Presented by: Cathy Blunt Griffith University Carol Brown Deaking University Peter McGrath University of Melbourne

Session 7: Internal Audit planning Presented by: Cathy BluntGriffith University Carol BrownDeaking University Peter McGrathUniversity of Melbourne

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Session 7: Internal Audit planning

Presented by:• Cathy Blunt Griffith University• Carol Brown Deaking University• Peter McGrath University of Melbourne

Internal Audit Unit

Approaches to Audit Planning

Cathy BluntManager Internal Audit

Griffith University

ANZUIAG 2010

Assurance & Operational Audit Planning Step 1 – Update audit universe (organisation chart & processes)

Step 2 – Risk assess business units and processes» Questionnaire based on risk & control factors

» Risk factors – materiality, organisational structure, complexity, IT systems, products/services, change, volume, performance gap, compliance, risk assessment results.

» Control factors – environment, risk assessment results, control activities, monitoring, ITC.

» Heat Maps – risk factor by control effectiveness

Internal Audit Unit

Internal Audit Unit

Disaster Recovery

Business Continuity

Eskitis Institute

Qld College of Art

Tendering Asset Mgt

Capital Works Projects Mgt

Workplace Health & Safety

Payables

Receivable

Corporate Credit Card

Losses

Insurance

School of Medicine

Australian Rivers Institute

Parking

Petty Cash

Travel Mgt

Control Effectiveness

High

High

Low

Low

Heat Map Example – Assurance & Operational Audits

Assurance & Operational Audit Planning

Step 3 – Compare highest risk activities to current strategic plan and immediate past plans

Step 4 – Develop first draft of strategic & annual audit plans & budget

Step 5 – Consult with senior management

Step 6 – Audit Committee endorsement & budget discussion

Step 7 – Vice Chancellor approval

Step 8 – Distribute approved plan to management

Internal Audit Unit

IT Audit Planning

Step 1 – Update audit universe (projects, applications, centres & processes)

Step 2 – Risk assess projects, applications & processes» ISACA Procedure P1 – IS Risk Assessment Measurement

» Meetings with INS to discuss & risk rate activities, etc

» Update risk assessment spreadsheet with risk ratings and weighted risk factors

» Charts for each projects, applications, centres & processes

Internal Audit Unit

IT Audit Planning

Projects – 15 Factors» Project Budget» Transaction Volume» Project Duration» Character of Activity» Resource Effort» Executive Mgt Interest» Fallback Arrangements» Level of Change» Complexity» Project Mgt & Build» Project Governance» Impact on Financial Reporting» Impact on Revenue» Impact on Customers» Ongoing Support Arrangements

Applications – 9 Factors» Effect of System Failure» Replacement Cost» Scope of System» Age of Application» Type of Build/Maintenance» Prior Audit Findings» Changes in Environment/Staff» Size of Application» System Interfaces

Internal Audit Unit

IT Audit Planning

Processes – 7 Factors» Effect of Process Failure» Process Impact/Scope» Process Performance» Process Documentation &

Training» Prior Audit Findings» Age of Process» Process Risk

Data Centres – 8 Factors» Number of Data Centre Staff» Effected of Prolonged Outage» Number of Applications» Number of Users» Prior Audit Findings» Sophistication of Processing» Changes in equipment, platform

& staff» Number of platforms

Internal Audit Unit

IT Audit Planning – Example Charts

Internal Audit Unit

Risk Ranked IT Projects

Risk Ranked IT Processes

Deakin UniversityInternal Audit Planning ProcessOverview

Audit Universe

Audit and Risk Planning Meeting

Discuss the following:

• What Internal Audit has done up to this point.

• New audits/Merged audits/Removed audits to the Audit Universe.

• High Residual Risk audits not planned to be covered in forthcoming year.

• Proposed draft Plan for forthcoming year.

• Assurance map (High Residual Risks based on Risk Registers).

• ARC members concerns or areas they would like some focus.

Example of Audits Added/NewMaster

Ref Code

Residual Risk

Area / Audit Title Audit Objective Comment

200 High IT Project's Implementation Status "Health Checks"

To review the status of selected IT projects to ascertain whether the project development and implementation objectives are being achieved and whether project risks are being addressed.

The objective of this review is to assess whether significant IT projects being implemented are meeting their development objectives and timelines during the implementation process and whether the significant risks of the project are being addressed throughout the implementation. 2011 will focus on Learning Management System with possible other systems being CRM, DFMS Upgrade, Business Intelligence and Deakin at Your Doorstep -subject to progress on project.

Draft IA Plan for Forthcoming Year

Draft 2011 Annual Internal Audit PlanInternal Audit assessment of residual risk rating

High Residual riskMedium Residual risk

Strategic Goal/

Risk RefQtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4

FBSD Financial and Business Services Division181 Credit Card Transactions 9

To review credit card transactions by cardholders related to selected areas of the University.

FBS-1 FBS-28

2010 I 15 7.5 7.5 2 areas per year are covered. This is a 100% transaction review for all cardholders within the nominated areas for a period of up to six months.

Comment

Mas

ter R

ef

Cod

e

Area/Audit Title/Objective/Scope

Last

Rev

iew

ed1

Res

ourc

e2

Budget Days /

Residual Risk

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Quarter

Assurance Map

Assurance Map

This “Map” details the various assurance activities across the University for risks which have been rated high residual risk and above. Very High High High Level of Assurance Medium Level of Assurance Low Level of Assurance

Area Assurance and Review Activities Risk Code

Risk Title Inherent Risk

Rating

Residual Risk

Rating

Audit Master Reference

Code

Man

agem

ent

Mon

itorin

g

Com

mitt

ee

Ove

rsig

ht

Exte

rnal

A

udit

Inte

rnal

Aud

it

Faculty of Arts and Education A&E-1 The failure to maintain and improve the Faculty's research may

impact on reputation both nationally and internationally which could lead to a detrimental effect on achieving the Faculty Top Third research aspirations.

High High RSD-101, UNI-196, RSD-203

Master Audit Plan Submitted to ARC for Approval

• Master Audit Plan is submitted at the November ARC meeting for approval.

• Includes:– Overview of Planning methodology– Overview on resources– Draft Plan for forthcoming year– Audit Universe– Assurance Map

ANZUIAG 2010

Host: University of the Sunshine Coast Queensland

(Session 7) Internal Audit Panning(Balancing a risk based approach with core requirements and External Audit hopes.)

Peter McGrathDirector Internal Audit

Audit Planning

Core Requirements

1. Professional Obligations

"Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization’s operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance process." (1)

2. Stakeholder Expectations

Audit and Risk Committee, Senior Executive, Operational Managers, VAGO, IA Team.

(1) Source: International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF), The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Florida USA, January 2009

Understand key customer expectations, issues & concerns

- How? consult broadly - talk to them

Develop a good knowledge of:

- Key business objectives

- Risk Management framework and risk profiles

- Key risk mitigation strategies

- What’s going on

Align audit strategy to customer expectations and risk profiles

Audit Planning

Gathering business intelligence – what’s going on?

- Discussions

- Committee papers

- Plans and budgets

- Risk profiles and mitigation strategies

- Management initiated reviews

- Correspondence

- AG’s management letter

- Media reports

- Rumours etc.

Audit Planning

Main Areas of Audit Interest – 2011 Plan

Severe

Major

Moderate

Minor

Insignificant

Excellent Adequate Fair Poor

Control

Risk

(1) Inherent (2) Residual (1) Risk registers (2) Management assessment

Low Moderate Significant High

Risk Level

No.

Auditable Area Primary Risk

1 Capital ProjectsFailure of project governance and management processes to deliver projects on time and on budget.

2 Training

Failure to provide appropriate training framework and programs increasing the risk of inappropriate staff behaviour , break of compliance obligations, and exposure to litigation.

3Research Management

Failure of processes to effectively and efficiently coordinate the University’s research activity to meet strategic and compliance objectives.

4Business Continuity

Failure of Emergency Response, Crisis Management and Business Continuity strategies to appropriately respond to a major event

5Budget Division Governance

Failure of management, processes and systems to meet corporate objectives and compliance obligations within the RDM environment.

6Records Management

Failure to maintain corporate records to meeting compliance and reporting obligations, and corporate memory.

7 Themis Renewal Failure of the various related projects to deliver the promised business benefits.

8ISIS (Student System)

Failure of ISIS to deliver the promised business benefits.

9IT Security & DRP

Failure of IT systems.

10Procurement and Cost Containment

Failure of procurement activity to be effectively and efficiently implemented increasing the risk of wastage, fraud and non achievement of cost containment targets.

11P&CS Scheduling

Failure of systems to provide appropriate coordination of maintenance, minor works and construction activity and for meeting contractual reporting obligations.

12Marketing & Communications

Failure of marketing and communications strategies to achieve key objectives.

13Financial Assurance

Failure of financial systems to process transactions and enable accurate reporting.

14 ComplianceFailure to meet key compliance obligations resulting in legal sanctions and reputational damage.

15Risk Management

Failure of RM processes.

Risk

1

2

1

2

3

3

4

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

14

13

5

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

15

Audit Resource Management System (ARMS)Audit universePrioritised based on five risk factors using 1 – 5 score:

- Inherent risk

- Residual risk

- Materiality

- Prior audit results (assurance)

- Audit judgement (gut feel informed by business intelligence) 15 % annual weightingTime budget and recording Report tracking

Audit Planning

Audit Assurance

With a devolved organisational structure “assurance” is important.

Divisional Audit

Risk based

Performed at the Budget Division level

Analytical review of finance, HR and other systems data (Profiling)

Review processes and controls for efficiency and effectiveness

Business objectives being met?

Where all the cultural issues play out

- Consultative approach

Audit Planning

Financial and Administrative Systems

Risk basedConfirm effectiveness and efficiency of key controls and processes; Finance, Purchasing Card, HR/Payroll, Students, Advance.

Information Technology (IT) Audit

Risk basedDatabase security controls reviews IT general controls reviews Pre- and post-implementation systems reviews Computer security reviews

Audit Planning

Audit Planning

Performance and System Reviews

Risk basedFocus on efficiency and effectiveness of what and how activities are performedConfirm the overall focus of the operations is in line with the University's strategic and operational plans.

Other Audits

On request from management perform performance /management audits, special investigations or act in a consulting role.

Audit Consulting – (Knowledge Transfer / Engagement)

Greater opportunity to be proactive!

Where we need to move if we want to address cultural issues.

New audit paradigm

- meet stakeholder expectations

- meet professional standards

Audit Planning

Audit Consulting – (Knowledge Transfer / Engagement) cont

Challenges How to better engage / partner with stakeholders / managers?

Manage people and their egos

Maintain the fine balance between being a colleague/consultant and policeman Remaining independent and objective Not assuming management responsibility but educating, cajoling and

what ever else it may take to get managers and all staff to take responsibility to improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance processes.

Audit Planning

Audit Consulting – (Knowledge Transfer / Engagement) cont

Mindset Shift

Leader & facilitator

Coach

Extrovert

Creative / innovative and energetic

Overriding caveat – independence

Audit Planning

Audit Consulting – (Knowledge Transfer / Engagement) cont

Establish relationships

Get their attentionAppeal to their personnel reputational risk

Face to face discussions

What are their issues?

How can audit add value for them?

Training / information deficits?

What do they need to do to achieve their goals and those of their department?

Audit Planning

Consulting – Knowledge Transfer / Engagement (Cont)

Planned Outcomes

Managers and staff better placed to perform their roles and meet their responsibilities

Proactively work with managers to address local issues

Take learning and apply to University wide

Communicate assurance to key stakeholders

Audit Planning

Summary - Operational Emphasis

Alignment of audit plan with stakeholder expectations and the University’s strategic and operational risk profiles

Identify and incorporate key risks and the value add proposition into each audit plan

Establishing a resourcing model which incorporates staffing flexibility: co-sourcing, agency staff, specialist expertise

Increased use of data extraction and manipulation for analysis to establish business profiles and areas of interest

Stakeholder engagement with emphasis on face to face interaction

Consulting, coaching and supporting

Stakeholder satisfaction

Audit Planning

Questions?

Audit Planning

© Copyright The University of Melbourne 2009