Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Glenn ParryProfessor of Strategy and Operations ManagementUniversity of the West of England
Servitization of the Home: IoT Development of Use-Visibility Measures
1
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017
Currently we information asymmetry in the home• Consumer has knowledge of functional
activities– Little information is passed back to the supplier
• Suppliers lack post sale visibility of their products in use
• Contexts of use are where value is created– Where products are used in combination with
other resource in value creating activity– This is the start point of the reverse supply chain
2
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Which is most valuable?
PolystyreneGold
3
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Value as “perceived in use” means we must consider context
The value of an offer to a consumer is only known when they integrate it into their lives
The value of an offer to a consumer is only known when they integrate it into their lives
4 of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Use value is difficult to capture and it is perceptual, and contextual which is annoying
• Capturing how ‘good’ something is in use is difficult
• Value is perceptually determined– by the user in their context
• Perceptions change with context and new information
• We need a constant stream of new use information
Businesses need to understand changing patterns of use
Businesses need to understand changing patterns of use
In their day these were all considered to be ‘good’
5
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Business models show firms value creation and capture process
Capture Worth
£ sustainable
Realised in use and context
Production ofa value proposition
Value
Source: Teece, 2010; Parry and Tasker, 20146 of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Currently PoS data is available and measured
Capture Worth
£ sustainable
Realised in use and context
Production ofa value proposition
Value
Point of sale data
Point of sale data
Infuences propositon
design
Infuences propositon
design
Customer survey data ? Customer survey data ?
7Note: PoS is ‘point of sale’
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
We can get consumer use data direct from IoT devices and sensors
Capture Worth
£ sustainable
Realised in use and context
Production ofa value proposition
Value
IoT Use DataIoT Use Data
8 of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017
This is already done in complex engineering service
• Helicopters and aircraft are now often sold as a service– E.g 1000 flying hours
• The provider needs to monitor condition and use– Health Usage Monitoring Systems
[HUMS]– Intelligence Vehicle Health
Management [IVHM]
• This changes the nature of the business model– often shifts responsibility and risk– Reliant on technology so requires
complex expensive infrastructure
9Source: Neely, A. (2010) “The Servitization of Manufacturing: Innovation in Business Models”, Service Grand Challenge Summit Meeting, Cambridge Sept 22nd. ; Image from Withus, http://www.withus.re.kr/withus/e/product/product_hums.htm
IoT extends this concept into the home at low costIoT extends this concept into the home at low cost
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Hub of All Things is the platform repository used to collect data
• HAT is a Personal Data Microserver Account (PDMA)
• HAT collects IoT and other data– And makes it accessible only to you in one place
• The platform is built– We had 6 people collecting a lot of personal
data– We are working now to scale up
• HAT PDMA is owned by the individual– Individuals share data only with those they
select– DP0’s data given to study
10
Hubofallthings.com
of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017
We undertook an explorative case study of 6 HAT users• Quantitative data from sensors and systems in the
homes– Instrumentation of rooms to create data density
• Qualitative data from interviews, user process descriptions and home visits
• Focus upon showering activity (difficult space)– Private function in the home– Video not acceptable– “Wet” environment– Mains power use limited
11
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Identification of many resources in the shower room
12
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017
Analysis of the resources led to a categorization of data types• Interaction Data
– Data from a resource/mechanism which is not transformed, diminished or depleted during single use E.g. taps, showers, doors, rooms
• Experience data– Information from resource that is transformed, diminished, but not depleted E.g.
towel, flannel,
• Depletion data– Data on a resource which is consumed at a rate higher than it is replenished
E.g. shower gel, shampoo
• Consumption data– Data on resource which is replenished at the rate it is consumed E.g. water,
electricity
These are nested functons and categorisaton is set by the chronology of a selected event
These are nested functons and categorisaton is set by the chronology of a selected event
13 of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Example of interaction data capture: the shower room
Also gives count data of Interacton with showerAlso gives count data of Interacton with shower
Z-wave humidity sensor
14
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Example of consumption data capture: shower water use
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 140
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
50
100
150
200
250
TimeVolume
Time / mins
Volume / Litres
Average 21 mins
Also gives count data of Interacton with showerAlso gives count data of Interacton with shower
Showering event occurrence
Z-wave flood sensor
Shower duraton and volume of water was much longer than individual thought!
Shower duraton and volume of water was much longer than individual thought!
Note: av. duration 19 mins; av. water vol. 149 litres (a bath is 80 litres)
15 of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Example of experience data capture: Towel
00:00:00
00:00:43
00:01:26
00:02:10
00:02:53
00:03:36
00:04:19
00:05:02
00:05:46
00:06:29
Tim
e
Occurrence
Z-wave motion sensor
It appeared that the towel was used more often than the ‘owner’ expectedOthers were using their towel to dry their hands!
It appeared that the towel was used more often than the ‘owner’ expectedOthers were using their towel to dry their hands!
16
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Example of depletion data capture: shampoo
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400
50
100
150
200
250
300
f(x) = − 2.25 x + 400.53R² = 0.91
f(x) = − 2.32 x + 176.4R² = 0.91
Days
Weight/g
(A)
(B)
AMBB; Developed by Cambridge
Shampoo consumpton rate was relatvely linearShampoo consumpton rate was relatvely linear
17 of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Example depletion data capture: Shower gel
Wei
ght
AMBB; Developed by Cambridge
Shower gel consumpton rate was erratcShower gel consumpton rate was erratc
18
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Linking data we can start to see the effects of context on shower gel use
Running increases both shower tme, and shower gel consumpton by 100%
Running increases both shower tme, and shower gel consumpton by 100%
19 of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017
Findings
• Explorative case shows IoT implementation and operationalisation in the home– Tracks consumption– Shows use and resource combination
• Provides a categorisation of consumption types– Helps in constructing measurement and sensor selection
• Numerous implications for supply– Consumers perceptions of use differs to actual
• Time in shower is longer• Use of towel is more ‘shared’ than thought
=> Survey data would be misleading– Some activities are moderators for others
• Running leads to longer shower length and double the consumption of shower gel
20
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
Session draws upon the open access paper:
Parry, G., Brax, S.A., Maull, R., Ng., I. (2016) “Visibility of consumer context: improving reverse supply with internet of things data”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 21 Iss: 2, pp.228 – 244
21
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017of 22
©Prof Glenn Parry 2017
Questions
www.hubofallthings.com
22
The ‘Good’ Professor@drgeep
Glenn Parry