16
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn Duffy Portland State University 7th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services Stellenbosch, South Africa August 14, 2007

Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries

(ARL) member libraries

Damon Jaggars & Shanna SmithUniversity of Texas at Austin

Jocelyn DuffyPortland State University

7th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services

Stellenbosch, South Africa

August 14, 2007

Page 2: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

LibQUAL+ instrument

- 22 items (1-9 Likert scale)

- Minimum, Perceived, Desired

- Dimensions of Service Quality: Affect of Service (AS), Information Control (IC), Library as Place (LP)

Page 3: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Information Control Undergraduate Graduate Faculty StaffEasy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own 3 5 5 8Making information easily accessible for independent use 6 6 6 13Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office 1 3 2 22A library website enabling me to locate information on my own 7.5 4 4 6Modern equipment that lets me easily access the information I need 2 7 10 15** Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work 12.5 1.5 1 10.5** The printed library materials I need for my work 16 10 8.5 14* The electronic information resources I need 12.5 1.5 3 12

Affect of ServiceReadiness to respond to users' questions 15 12 13 5Employees who understand the needs of their users 19 14 11.5 7Employees who deal with users in a caring fashion 18 17 15 10.5Employees who instill confidence in users 21 20 16 9Employees who have the knowledge to answer user questions 10 9 8.5 3Willingness to help users 17 11 14 2Giving users individual attention 22 22 17 17Dependability in handling users' service problems 4.5 8 11.5 4Employees who are consistently courteous 14 13 7 1

Library as Place** A getaway for study, learning, or research 4.5 15 19 18** Library space that inspires study and learning 11 19 20 19** Quiet space for individual activities 7.5 18 21 16A comfortable and inviting location 9 16 18 20* Community space for group learning and group study 18 21 22 21

Desired Mean Ranking 2005

Page 4: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Calculating Priority Index• Define service priorities for individual respondents by re-scaling desired

scores

• Illustration: – Betty, a member of the library staff– Very high expectations; average desired score across all 22 items

is 8.8. – Some items more important than others to her

• Desired score for “comfortable and inviting location” is 7• Desired score for “employees who deal with users in a caring

fashion” is 9– Re-scale Betty’s scores around her individual mean of 8.8 to

calculate priority scores– New scores: -1.8 for inviting location (below-average); +0.2 for

caring for users (above-average)

Page 5: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Results for UT Austin Analysis

• Library staff set a lower service priority than users on several IC items

• Library staff set a higher service priority than users on several AS items

• Library staff prioritize higher than faculty, lower than undergraduates, and similarly to graduate students on LP items

• Are our local results generalizable across the larger library community, specifically the ARL cohort?

Page 6: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

ARL Cohort Study Sample

• ARL cohort for 2006 LibQUAL+ survey administration

• 45 ARL libraries

• 28,851 useable surveys submitted: – 10,856 from undergraduates– 11,157 from graduate students– 6,214 from faculty– 624 from library staff

Page 7: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Average Faculty & Library Staff Priority Scores for 7 Selected ARL Libraries

Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office (IC1)

Page 8: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Information Control: ARL Cohort

E-resources from home/office

Website/information on own

Printed materials

E-resources I need

Modern equipment

Easy-to-use access tools

Making information accessible

Print or e-journals

Page 9: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Affect of Service: ARL Cohort

Instill confidence

Individual attention

Courteous

Ready response

Knowledge

Caring

Understand needs

Willing to help

Dependable

Page 10: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Library as Place: ARL Cohort

Inspire study & learning

Quiet space/individual

Comforting/inviting

A getaway

Group learning/study

Page 11: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Results from ARL Cohort Study

• Misalignments in service priorities found in the local analysis confirmed and expanded in the ARL cohort analysis

• Library staff set a lower service priority for most IC items

• Library staff set a higher service priority for all AS items (except AS #9 – Dependability of service)

• Library staff prioritize higher than faculty, lower than undergraduates, and similarly to graduate students on LP items

Page 12: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Conclusions

• ARL Cohort library staff, in general, have not yet internalized the extent to which many users prioritize unmediated access to easy-to-use, quality content and services and de-emphasize traditional mediated service.

• Disparate, and sometimes conflicting, service priorities of our core user groups, especially faculty and undergraduates is a complicating factor.

• A challenge for library leadership to work with staff to better align organizational service priorities with evolving user needs and demonstrated behaviors.

Page 13: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Possible Limitations

• Assumption: Users’ desired scores on the LibQUAL+ survey can be used to indicate the relative importance of a survey item

• Relatively small sample size of library staff

• Point of view staff take when responding to the survey

Page 14: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Future Research

• Are the service priorities of staff and users diverging over time?

• Is it useful to compare the service priorities of an individual library’s staff against the cohort (or a chosen cohort)?

Page 15: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Local - ARL Cohort Comparison

F = Faculty

G = Graduate students

U = Undergraduates

“+” = Library staff set higher service priority

“-” = Library staff set lower service priority

Red = marginally higher or lower prioritization

Item UT Austin ARL Cohort

AS-1 Employees who instill confidence in users F+G+U+ F+G+U+AS-2 Giving users individual attention G+U+ F+G+U+AS-3 Employees who are consistently courteous U+ F+G+U+AS-4 Readiness to respond to users' questions F+G+U+AS-5 Employees who have the knowledge to answer user questions F+G+U+AS-6 Employees who deal with users in a caring fashion F+G+U+AS-7 Employees who understand the needs of their users F+G+U+AS-8 Willingness to help users F+G+U+AS-9 Dependability in handling users' service problems F-IC-1 Making electronic resources accessible from my home or office F-G-U- F-G-U-IC-2 A library Web site enabling me to locate information on my own F-G- F-G-U-IC-3 The printed library materials I need for my work U+ F-G-U-IC-4 The electronic information resources I need F-G- F-G-U-IC-5 Modern equipment that lets me easily access needed information F-G-U-IC-6 Easy-to-use access tools that allow me to find things on my own F-G- F-G-U-IC-7 Making information easily accessible for independent use F-G- F-G-U-IC-8 Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work F-G- F-G-LP-1 Library space that inspires study and learning F+U- F+U-LP-2 Quiet space for individual activities F+U- F+G-U-LP-3 A comfortable and inviting location U- F+U-LP-4 A getaway for study, learning, or research F+ F+G-U-LP-5 Community space for group learning and group study F+G+ F+U-

Page 16: Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn

Contact Information

Damon JaggarsUniversity of Texas [email protected](512) 495-4321

Shanna SmithDivision of Statistics and Scientific ComputationUniversity of Texas at [email protected](512) 475-9425

Jocelyn DuffyPortland State University [email protected](503) 725-4126