1
406 times as long as the width of the base may be used. During experiments on intravital staining of flaps raised on the flank of a pig, Dr. Stuart Milton, in Oxford, made the chance observation that the flaps he cut, though of very different widths, all survived to approximately the same length.’ A flap consisting of almost the whole pig flank survived to the same length whether left intact or split longitudinally into several flaps of different widths. These flaps were not con- forming to the old concept relating width of base to length, in that the viable length of the narrow ones was equal to that of the broad ones. It was found mathematically that they did, however, conform to a constant width-of-base to area-of-flap ratio. This new concept of relating width of base to flap area, rather than to flap length, makes sense in terms of physiology, as it is the actual amount of tissue that can be nourished by a given width of base that matters. Doubling the width and length of a flap produces twice as much blood-supply, but four times the amount of tissue to be nourished. No matter how wide the base of a flap, it will only survive to a constant length on any given part of the body. Doubling the width of the base doubles the volume of tissue to be nourished, and therefore does not allow any increase in length. Con- versely, narrowing the base of a parallel-sided flap does not reduce the viable length unless-as happened in some of Dr. Milton’s pigs-by so doing the surgeon excludes a major feeding vessel. Surgeons will continue to cut flaps in the light of their own experience. However, they will now think in terms of area-to-width, rather than length-to-width, and perhaps bear this in mind when cutting extremely large flaps which clinical experience has shown are not always safe, even when designed " square". Dr. Milton has shown us why. SEPTIC THROMBOPHLEBITIS AND VENOUS CANNULAS A CONNECTION between septicaemia, thrombo- phlebitis, and indwelling venous cannulas has been established; and septic complications seem to be commoner now that these cannulas are being increas- ingly used.2,3 Septic thrombophlebitis is a serious condition and, even without cannulas, it is a well-known danger of many suppurative infections, such as septic abortion and osteomyelitis. Septic emboli may produce lung abscesses, a generalised pyaemia or septicaemia, and even bacterial endocarditis. During the past few years, disturbing reports have come from the burns unit of the U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research in Texas concerning septicaemia and septic thrombophlebitis.4-7 The thrombophlebitis was traced to the use of indwelling venous cannulas which were being, or had been, used during the 1. Milton, S. H. Br. J. Surg. 1970, 57, 502. 2. Phillips, R. W., Eyre, J. D., Jr. New Engl. J. Med. 1958, 259, 729. 3. Elfving, G., Hästbacka, J., Tanmisto, T. Am. Heart J. 1967, 73, 717. 4. O’Neill, J. A., Pruitt, B. A., Foley, F. D., Moncrief, J. A. J. Trauma, 1968, 8, 256. 5. Foley, F. D. Am. J. clin. Path. 1969, 52, 1. 6. Pruitt, B. A., Stein, J. M., Foley, F. D., Moncrief, J. A., O’Neill, J. A. Archs Surg. 1970, 100, 399. 7. Stein, J. M., Pruitt, B. A. New Engl. J. Med. 1970, 282, 1452. shock phase and later for fluid therapy or other reasons. Large burns, of course, commonly become infected and septicaemia has nearly always been due to heavy infection; but this danger has been lessened recently by the topical use of antibacterial agents such as mafenide (’Marfanil’, ’ Sulfamylon’) and silver nitrate. Mafenide is used in Texas, where, from a series of necropsies, Foley 5 found that by 1966 septic phlebitis of cannulated veins had become a source of fatal septicaemia equal in importance to the bum wound itself. Sometimes the cannula was still present at necropsy, but in other cases it had been withdrawn days or even weeks before. This-point is emphasised in the clinical reports, and Stein and Pruitt observed that the cut-down incision was often healed by the time septic thrombophlebitis was diagnosed. Septic thrombophlebitis was found in 4% of 1929 inpatients during 1960-68,6 and in 4.6% of 521 patients during 1967 and 1968. In 7 of the 24 cases,’ complicating septicsemia was the cause of death. The textbook picture of superficial phlebitis (pain, tenderness, swelling, and a red streak) was seldom seen, even when the cannula had been inserted through unburned skin, and the diagnosis was made only post mortem in more than half the cases. This silent onset suggests that infective thrombophlebitis following cannulation may be commoner than is realised. When it was looked for, it was found in 4 out of 60 surgical cases, in 2 of which it was lethal. The septicaemia unheralded by clinical evidence of thrombophlebitis has a parallel with pulmonary embolism from silent deep-vein thrombosis. In the first report of the Texas workers,3 Staphylo- coccus aureus was the most common organism isolated from the infected material in the veins, but gram- negative bacteria, especially Klebsiella, Providencia, and Proteus species, were dominant later. The exact mechanism of the infection is uncertain, but the cut-down incisions seemed an unlikely source because they were often healed at the time of diagnosis. Bacteria entering the lumen of the cannula may be trapped by the small thrombus which normally forms at its tip, and this is the seed from which the infective process may spread. As for clinical diagnosis, Stein and Pruitt advocate exploration of venotomy sites in all suspected cases, milking the vein, and culturing any purulent or thrombotic material which exudes. Section of the vein and antibiotic therapy are advocated by Hume et al.,9 who also warn against using heparin when there is evidence of septicaemia. The Texas workers insist that if septicaemia is present, the only certain cure is excision of the whole of the affected vein and its affected tributaries. Prevention, however, is better. The connection between the indwelling duration of the cannula and thrombophlebitis is a guide to action, since the time was longer than two days in nearly all cases. Indwelling venous catheters should be used only when strictly necessary and not when a needle is sufficient; and they should be withdrawn as soon as possible. 8. Stein, J. M. Archs Surg. 1970, 100, 403. 9. Hume, M., Sevitt, S., Thomas, D. P. Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. Cambridge, Mass, 1970.

SEPTIC THROMBOPHLEBITIS AND VENOUS CANNULAS

  • Upload
    pragna

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

406

times as long as the width of the base may be used.During experiments on intravital staining of flaps

raised on the flank of a pig, Dr. Stuart Milton, inOxford, made the chance observation that the flaps hecut, though of very different widths, all survived toapproximately the same length.’ A flap consisting ofalmost the whole pig flank survived to the same lengthwhether left intact or split longitudinally into severalflaps of different widths. These flaps were not con-forming to the old concept relating width of base tolength, in that the viable length of the narrow oneswas equal to that of the broad ones. It was found

mathematically that they did, however, conform to aconstant width-of-base to area-of-flap ratio. This new

concept of relating width of base to flap area, ratherthan to flap length, makes sense in terms of physiology,as it is the actual amount of tissue that can be nourished

by a given width of base that matters. Doubling thewidth and length of a flap produces twice as muchblood-supply, but four times the amount of tissue to benourished. No matter how wide the base of a flap, itwill only survive to a constant length on any givenpart of the body. Doubling the width of the basedoubles the volume of tissue to be nourished, andtherefore does not allow any increase in length. Con-

versely, narrowing the base of a parallel-sided flapdoes not reduce the viable length unless-as happenedin some of Dr. Milton’s pigs-by so doing the surgeonexcludes a major feeding vessel.

Surgeons will continue to cut flaps in the light oftheir own experience. However, they will now thinkin terms of area-to-width, rather than length-to-width,and perhaps bear this in mind when cutting extremelylarge flaps which clinical experience has shown arenot always safe, even when designed " square".Dr. Milton has shown us why.

SEPTIC THROMBOPHLEBITIS AND VENOUSCANNULAS

A CONNECTION between septicaemia, thrombo-

phlebitis, and indwelling venous cannulas has beenestablished; and septic complications seem to becommoner now that these cannulas are being increas-ingly used.2,3 Septic thrombophlebitis is a seriouscondition and, even without cannulas, it is a well-knowndanger of many suppurative infections, such as septicabortion and osteomyelitis. Septic emboli may producelung abscesses, a generalised pyaemia or septicaemia,and even bacterial endocarditis.

During the past few years, disturbing reports havecome from the burns unit of the U.S. Army Instituteof Surgical Research in Texas concerning septicaemiaand septic thrombophlebitis.4-7 The thrombophlebitiswas traced to the use of indwelling venous cannulaswhich were being, or had been, used during the1. Milton, S. H. Br. J. Surg. 1970, 57, 502.2. Phillips, R. W., Eyre, J. D., Jr. New Engl. J. Med. 1958, 259, 729.3. Elfving, G., Hästbacka, J., Tanmisto, T. Am. Heart J. 1967, 73, 717.4. O’Neill, J. A., Pruitt, B. A., Foley, F. D., Moncrief, J. A. J. Trauma,

1968, 8, 256.5. Foley, F. D. Am. J. clin. Path. 1969, 52, 1.6. Pruitt, B. A., Stein, J. M., Foley, F. D., Moncrief, J. A., O’Neill,

J. A. Archs Surg. 1970, 100, 399.7. Stein, J. M., Pruitt, B. A. New Engl. J. Med. 1970, 282, 1452.

shock phase and later for fluid therapy or otherreasons. Large burns, of course, commonly becomeinfected and septicaemia has nearly always been dueto heavy infection; but this danger has been lessenedrecently by the topical use of antibacterial agents suchas mafenide (’Marfanil’, ’ Sulfamylon’) and silvernitrate. Mafenide is used in Texas, where, from aseries of necropsies, Foley 5 found that by 1966 septicphlebitis of cannulated veins had become a source offatal septicaemia equal in importance to the bumwound itself. Sometimes the cannula was still presentat necropsy, but in other cases it had been withdrawndays or even weeks before. This-point is emphasisedin the clinical reports, and Stein and Pruitt observedthat the cut-down incision was often healed by thetime septic thrombophlebitis was diagnosed. Septicthrombophlebitis was found in 4% of 1929 inpatientsduring 1960-68,6 and in 4.6% of 521 patients during1967 and 1968. In 7 of the 24 cases,’ complicatingsepticsemia was the cause of death. The textbookpicture of superficial phlebitis (pain, tenderness,swelling, and a red streak) was seldom seen, evenwhen the cannula had been inserted through unburnedskin, and the diagnosis was made only post mortemin more than half the cases. This silent onset suggeststhat infective thrombophlebitis following cannulationmay be commoner than is realised. When it was looked

for, it was found in 4 out of 60 surgical cases, in 2 ofwhich it was lethal. The septicaemia unheralded byclinical evidence of thrombophlebitis has a parallelwith pulmonary embolism from silent deep-veinthrombosis.

In the first report of the Texas workers,3 Staphylo-coccus aureus was the most common organism isolatedfrom the infected material in the veins, but gram-negative bacteria, especially Klebsiella, Providencia,and Proteus species, were dominant later. The exactmechanism of the infection is uncertain, but thecut-down incisions seemed an unlikely source becausethey were often healed at the time of diagnosis.Bacteria entering the lumen of the cannula may betrapped by the small thrombus which normally formsat its tip, and this is the seed from which the infectiveprocess may spread.As for clinical diagnosis, Stein and Pruitt advocate

exploration of venotomy sites in all suspected cases,milking the vein, and culturing any purulent or

thrombotic material which exudes. Section of thevein and antibiotic therapy are advocated by Hume etal.,9 who also warn against using heparin when thereis evidence of septicaemia. The Texas workers insistthat if septicaemia is present, the only certain cure isexcision of the whole of the affected vein and itsaffected tributaries. Prevention, however, is better.The connection between the indwelling duration ofthe cannula and thrombophlebitis is a guide to action,since the time was longer than two days in nearly allcases. Indwelling venous catheters should be used

only when strictly necessary and not when a needle issufficient; and they should be withdrawn as soon aspossible.8. Stein, J. M. Archs Surg. 1970, 100, 403.9. Hume, M., Sevitt, S., Thomas, D. P. Venous Thrombosis and

Pulmonary Embolism. Cambridge, Mass, 1970.