Upload
ernest-roberts
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Workshop Objectives: SESSION 2 Participants will: Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Citation preview
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011
facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas
TST BOCES Network Team
Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Session 2 AGENDA• Overview of 9 Criteria for Lead Evaluator Training• Reminder of Priorities of the Frameworks• Observation Practice 1
• Scripting, Checking, Categorizing• Asking Clarifying Questions• Leveling the Performance Based on a Rubric
• Observation Practice 2• Scripting, Checking, Categorizing• Asking Clarifying Questions• Leveling the Performance Based on a Rubric
• Wrap Up & EvaluationDeveloped by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT
Rubrics-ASCD
Workshop Objectives: SESSION 2Participants will:
• Understand the 9 APPR criteria for Lead Evaluator Training & how BOCES training will address these
• Remember/reconsider the common priorities underlying the rubrics
• Practice observation skills, focusing on:• Evidence collection & self-check• Alignment of evidence with Standards & Domains• Asking clarifying questions to promote professional
reflection & growth• Leveling the teacher’s performance based on a rubric
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Priorities of the Rubrics
• Cognitive Engagement• Constructivist Learning• 21st Century Skills
The LEARNING is done by the LEARNER!
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Priorities of the Rubrics
• TASK: For your assigned priority, work with your partner/group to come up with:• A brief definition• A few “look-fors” for observing this priority in
the classroom ( you can pick a grade &/or subject)
• If possible, an example you have observed in a classroom
PRIORITIES = Cognitive Engagement, Constructivist Learning, 21st Century Skills
Priorities of the Rubrics• Cognitive Engagement
• “Effective” = students must be cognitively engaged • “Highly Effective” = cognitive engagement PLUS meta-
cognition and student ownership of their learning• Constructivist Learning
• Effective and Highly Effective = evidence of learning experiences designed to facilitate students’ construction of knowledge & connections to prior knowledge.
• 21st Century Skills• Effective and Highly Effective = evidence of application
of 21st Century college & career-readiness skills and dispositions
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD6
Observing Practice• Observe the video • Collect evidence, especially evidence of Domain 3: Instruction// Standard 3: Instructional Practice
• Be prepared to share your evidence
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Checking Evidence• Use the self-check questions to review your
evidence collectionHave I recorded only facts?Is my evidence relevant to the criteria being
examined?Whenever possible, have I quantified words such
as few, some, and most?Have I used quotation marks when quoting a
teacher or student?Does my selection or documentation of evidence
indicate any personal or professional preferences?
Have I included any opinion (in the guise of fact)?Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Observing Practice: Sorting Evidence
• With a partner, sort your evidence so that it aligns with the appropriate criteria in your rubric for instruction
Observing Practice: Clarifying Questions
• With your partner, develop questions you have about the lesson you observed that must be answered before you rate the teacher’s performance.
• Be prepared to share one or two of your questions.
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Question Review• Review the questions you and your partner
created• Be sure to frame your questions to ensure
that they are designed to promote a climate of professional inquiry
• Consider the following:• How does the question make you feel?• How might the teacher respond to the
question?• Revise your questions as necessary.
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
Leveling Teacher Performance
Click icon to add picture
The Evidence Cycle
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
COLLECTDATA
(Evidence)
SORT TOALIGN
WITH YOURFRAMEWORK
Interpret:Clarify
Conclusions
Impact on learning…Support needed…
NO!
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
• Unsatisfactory / Ineffective – Teaching shows evidence of not understanding the concepts underlying the component - may represent practice that is harmful - requires intervention
• Basic / Developing– Teaching shows evidence of knowledge and skills related to teaching - but inconsistent performance
Levels of Performance
Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD
• Proficient / Effective- Teaching shows evidence of thorough knowledge of all aspects of the profession. Students are engaged in learning. This is successful, accomplished, professional, and effective teaching.
• Distinguished / Highly Effective– Classroom functions as a community of learners with student assumption of responsibility for learning.
Levels of Performance
Debrief and Closure
• Next steps – • Future sessions at BOCES• How are you sharing this information
with teachers?• Got It/Want It/Questions• Please remember to complete the
workshop evaluationThank you for your
participation!Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-
ASCD