SEPTA Customer Service Program · PDF fileSEPTA Customer Service Program Report ... This project will continue to ... Conducted initial Internal Procurement Customer Satisfaction Survey

  • Upload
    vudan

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • SEPTA

    Customer Service Program

    Report

    January 2015

    SEPTA is committed to consistently deliver a positive customer experience!

    We are driven by our customers and fueled by their expectations.

  • Table of Contents

    Page #

    Introduction from AGM Kim Scott Heinle 2

    Internal Customer Service Initiatives & Progress

    Complaint & Commendation Metrics 3

    Customer Service Call Center Metrics 4

    Social Media Metrics & Performance 5

    Service Quality Overview 6 - 7

    BASCSC Progress Report 8

    SEPTA Customer Connect (SCC) Update 9

    CS&A and SEPTA Key 10 - 11

    Rebuilding for the Future Highlights 12

    Other Divisional Customer Service Initiatives 13

    Looking Ahead to Fiscal Year 2016 14 - 15

  • Introduction

    Kim Scott Heinle, AGM

    What is expected by a customer is predicated on past experience. Excelling at service means

    having the capacity to meet and exceed customer expectations on a regular basis. As we achieve

    success, it sets the bar higher. It raises our customers expectations about what we are capable of

    doing.

    SEPTA is committed to consistently deliver a positive Customer Experience! We are driven

    by our customers and fueled by their expectations.

    Sound familiar? It should. Its our Customer Service Vision statement.

    Being Customer-Focused has been part of our agenda since 2008 when Joe Casey became the

    General Manager. It remains true today. We need to continually define our work priorities around the

    4Cs of Customer Service, and make sure that our efforts are aligned with customer needs and

    expectations.

    Every New Year ushers in anticipation and excitement. Looking forward, 2015 will have a host of

    important events that will require a total team effort. First and foremost will be the transforming effect

    of the SEPTA KEY (no longer New Payment Technologies). This project will continue to consume

    our time and attention until it finally bursts onto the scene sometime in the second half of the year.

    Stay tuned!!

    But we also have another Winter Season to manage, the Flower Show and a very hectic

    construction season, and in the fall, a visit by the Pope and about two million of his faithful.

    This report takes a look back to where we have been, and looks forward to where we are heading.

    Lets sustain the tasks that are doing well and focus on improving the items where there iswell,

    room for a little improvement.

    Kim Scott Heinle

    Assistant General Manager

    Customer Service & Advocacy

    2

  • Complaint & Commendation

    Metrics

    A key performance indicator for the Customer Service Call Center is the percentage of Calls Resolved at

    First Contact. During the last six months of 2014, we achieved a landmark 91% of contacts resolved at

    first contact, up 7% from the comparable time period in 2013.

    In addition, for four of the last six months SEPTAs Commendation to Complaint Ratio performed at

    levels exceeding our 5 year goal as stated in the 2015-2019 Strategic Business Plan.

    3

    2,9

    94

    2,8

    39

    3,8

    97

    4,0

    06

    3,1

    30

    3,0

    09

    88% 91% 92% 88% 91% 92%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Complaints Resolved 1st Contact

    Straight line

    represents 2013

    average

    Straight line

    represents 2013

    average

    Complaints & Commendations 1

    68

    20

    6

    18

    1 24

    1

    19

    4

    22

    1

    6%

    7%

    5%

    6% 6% 7%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Commendations Commend/Complain Ratio

    Straight line

    represents

    5 year goal

    Straight line

    represents 2013

    average

  • Call volumes were relatively steady during the last six months of 2014 for both the CS and CS/CCT Call

    Centers. The percentage of dropped calls declined to historic lows, with the CS Call Center experiencing

    an improvement of 54% from 2013s average.

    In addition, the CS/CCT Call Center also achieved a 44% reduction in dropped calls from the comparable

    period in 2013.

    Customer Service Call

    Center Metrics

    4

    12

    1,7

    91

    11

    8,8

    81

    12

    6,3

    11

    12

    2,5

    54

    11

    6,4

    98

    11

    9,8

    34

    9%

    5%

    7%

    4% 4% 3%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    CS: Calls Answered % DroppedStraight line

    represents 2013

    average Straight line

    represents 2013

    average

    5,1

    97

    4,5

    38

    5,0

    37

    5,4

    75

    4,4

    70

    4,5

    80

    9%

    4%

    7%

    8%

    12%

    6%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    CS/CCT: Calls Answered % Dropped

    Straight line

    represents

    5 year goal

    Straight line

    represents 2013

    average

    Customer Service Contact Center Call Volume

  • @SEPTA_SOCIAL experienced steady but modest growth July through December. This moderate

    growth is attributed to the decreased ridership level during the summer months. A slight increase in

    engagement occurred during the back to school period. Additionally contributing to the lowered growth

    rate is the fact that technology savvy customers are increasingly using the thriving official SEPTA Apps,

    in turn mitigating customers' reliance on contacting @SEPTA_SOCIAL for real-time transit information.

    It has also been speculated that there may have been a decline in the novelty of a primarily customer

    service SEPTA Twitter account over time, leading to a follower plateau. This theory prompted CS

    Social Media staff to explore and employ strategies to gain followers and increase engagement. In late

    2014, these strategies have included increased customer follow up and spontaneous recognition, along

    with small contests and giving out prizes.

    CS Social Media staff expects to play a role in the advent of the SEPTA Key roll out and through

    sustained implementation via a social presence; subsequently leading to greater staffing challenges.

    10,3

    46

    10

    ,56

    3

    10,7

    88

    11

    ,24

    9

    11

    ,49

    7

    11

    ,65

    4

    2% 2% 2%

    4%

    2%

    1%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Facebook Likes Likes Growth Rate

    Social Media Metrics &

    Performance

    5

    2,4

    11

    2,4

    55

    3,2

    70

    2,9

    45

    3,6

    32

    2,9

    23

    3054

    2995

    3124

    2869

    3619

    3586

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Mentions Sent Tweets

    @SEPTA_SOCIAL Followers, Likes & Activity

    6,7

    82

    7,0

    18

    7,1

    78

    7,5

    18

    7,7

    77

    7,9

    90

    2% 3%

    2%

    5% 3% 3%

    Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    SEPTA_SOCIAL Followers Growth Rate

  • Service Quality Overview (1 of 2)

    6

    One of the ways that Customer Service helps the disabled community is through our Service Quality

    team performing audits of stop announcements on vehicles. The evaluation of stop announcements is

    critical to SEPTAs compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Service Quality increased

    their number of evaluations performed overall by 13% in the last six months of 2014. In addition,

    SEPTAs performance in these evaluations has consistently exceeded the important 90% compliance

    threshold. These stop announcement appraisals are graded across modes on a pass-fail basis.

    Service Quality also evaluates 4 C (Cleanliness, Convenience, Communication, Courtesy) performance

    across all service modes. Elements comprising the 4 Cs are also graded on a pass-fail basis for vehicles

    and services. The below chart illustrates 4 C performance by Surface, Rail and Subway/El services from

    July through December of 2014.

    Surface scores for Communication were impacted by a lack of schedules available on vehicles observed

    and lagged other modes mostly due to this one criteria.

    1,487 1,720

    739 874

    77 61

    94% 95%

    98% 96% 97%

    92%

    Jan - Jun 2014 Jul - Dec 2014

    # of Surface Evaluations

    # of Rail Evaluations

    # of Sub/El Evaulations

    Surface Compliance

    Rail Compliance

    Sub/El Compliance

    Stop Announcement Evaluations

    Vehicle and Service 4 C Compliance Rates 2014

    92% 96% 94%

    73%

    98% 98% 89% 92% 95% 96%

    98% 95%

    Cleanliness Convenience Courtesy Communication

    Surface Rail Subway/El

  • Service Quality Overview (2 of 2)

    7

    In 2014, Service Quality staff began to evaluate stations with a little more depth. While elements

    comprising the 4 Cs are graded on a pass-fail basis for vehicles and services, station quality scores are

    now rated across a 4 point scale- 1. Unacceptable, 2. Poor, 3. Good and 4. Excellent.

    As in previous intervals, scores across all modes for vehicles, service and stations are well above

    industry standards and are considered excellent in most areas. That said, some key areas (schedules

    and cleanliness on Surface) can be improved.

    Service Quality has shared their observations and findings with appropriate Operations staff with data