Upload
taariq
View
35
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Self-Propelled Motions of Solids in a Fluid: Mathematical Analysis, Simulation and Control. Marius TUCSNAK Institut Elie Cartan de Nancy et INRIA Lorraine, projet CORIDA Collaborations with : Jorge SAN MARTIN (Santiago) Jean-François SCHEID (IECN) Takeo TAKAHASHI (IECN). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Self-Propelled Motions of Solids in a Fluid: Mathematical Analysis, Simulation and Control
Marius TUCSNAKInstitut Elie Cartan de Nancy et
INRIA Lorraine, projet CORIDA
Collaborations with :Jorge SAN MARTIN (Santiago) Jean-François SCHEID (IECN)Takeo TAKAHASHI (IECN)
2
Motivation: understanding locomotion of aquatic organisms,in particular to design swimming-robots
3
Motion of solids in a fluid
• Incompressible Navier-Stokes (Euler, Stokes) equations for the fluid
• ODE’s or PDE’s system for the motion of the solids
• Continuity of the velocity field at the interface • Homogenous Dirichlet boundary conditions on
the exterior boundary
4
Plan of the talk
• The model and the mathematical challenge
• An existence and uniqueness theorem
• Numerical method and simulations
• Self-propelling at low Reynolds number
5
The model and the mathematical challenge
6
7
Kinematics of the creature (I)
S*(T)
8
Kinematics of the creature (II)
9
The governing equations
0, ( ), 0 ,div 0, ( ), 0 ,
tu u u u p x F t t [ ,T]u x F t t [ ,T]
( )
( )
, ( ), [0, ],
, [0, ],
d , [0, ], d
S t
S t
w x S t t T
d t T
x
h x
h d t Tt
Mh
u
n
J n
h
0 0 1 0(0) ,( , '(0) , 0) ( (0,) ) i ih h hu u x hx
10
Existence theorems
Theorem (J. San Martin, J. –F. Scheid, T. Takahashi, M.T., ARMA (2008)).If the given deformation is smooth enough than the system admits an unique strong solution. If no contact occurs in finite time then this solution is global.
The Leray type mathematical theory has been initiated around year 2000. Early mathematical ref. for rigid-fluid interaction from a mathematical view-point : • D. Serre ( 1987) • K. H. Hoffmann and V. Starovoitov ( 2000) • B. Desjardins and M. Esteban ( 1999,2000) • C. Conca, J. San Martin and M. Tucsnak (2001)• J. San Martin, V. Starovoitov and M. Tucsnak (2002)
Control theoretic challenge: the input of the system is the geometry of the domain.
11
Numerical Method and Simulations
12
References
• Carling, Williams and G.~Bowtell, (1998)• Liu and Kawachi (1999)• Leroyer and M.Visonneau, (2005)• J. San Martin, J.-F. Scheid and M. Tucsnak (SINUM 2005, ARMA 2008)
.
13
Two bilinear forms
14
Global weak formulation(J. San Martin, J.F –Scheid, T. Takahashi and M.T.
in SINUM (2005) )
15
Semi-discretization with respect to time
Choice of characteristics
16
1717
Finite element spaces
• Fixed mesh• Rigidity matrix is (partially) re-calculated at each time step
18
Convergence of solutions
18
19
Straight-line swimming
20
Turning
21
Meeting
22
Can they really touch?
The answer is no for rigid balls (San Martin, Starovoitov and Tucsnak (2002),Hesla (2006), Hillairet (2006) , but unknown in general.
2323
Mickey’s Reconstruction
2424
Kiss and go effect
25
Perspectives
26
• Coupling of the existing model to elastodynamics type models for the fish
• Control problems
• Infirming or confirming « Gray’s paradox »
• Giving a rigorous proof of the existence of self-propelled motions
27
A Control Theoretic Approach to the Swimming of Cilia Micro-Organisms
28
The model :One rigid ball in the whole space
0, ( ), 0 ,div 0, ( ), 0 ,
tu u u u p x F t t [ ,T]u x F t t [ ,T]
( )
( )
, ( ), [0, ],
, [0, ],
d , [0, ], d
( )
R
B t
B t
V x B t t T
d t T
d
h x hu
n
t T
Mh
J x ht
n
( ).R RS
3( )) (\F t B tR
29
Change of coordinates : ( )y x h t
( ) 0, y , 0 ,
div 0, y , 0 ,
tu u u u h t u p F t [ ,T]
u F t [ ,T]
, y , [0, ],d, , d [0, ], ) d(d
R
BB
V S t T
t Tt
u
n x
h
M n
x
h J
( )R RS
3 , ( ) \0 FB B B
30
0, y , 0 ,div 0, y , 0 ,
u p F t [ ,T]u F t [ ,T]
( ( ))
, y , [0, ],
, , [0, ], 0 , , ) 0 , , )
,
( d ( dB B
B t Th xu
n x
u
l u l u
h l
t
R
n T
( ),RS
u
0 0 1 0(0) ,( , '(0) , 0) ( (0,) ) i ih h hu u y hy
A simplified finite dimensional model
61
( )( , ) ( )ii iu y t v t y
The control is:
with given « shape » functions.i
The case of small deformations
31
32
A controllability resultBy « freezing » the deformation (Blake’s « layer model »), we obtain a simplified model which can be written as a dynamical system
9+ in SO(3) .Z F BuZ R•Proposition. (J. San Martin, T. Takahashi and M.T., QAM (2008)) •Generically (with respect to the shape functions), the above system •is controllable in any time. With “standard” choices of the shape functions•the controllabilty fails with less than 6 controls.
Remark. For less symmetric shapes less than 6 controls suffice(Sigalotti and Vivalda, 2007)
Some perspectives
• Optimal control problems, in particular obtaining the motion of cilia by solving an optimization problems.
• Proving the existence of self-propelled motions for arbitrary Reynolds numbers
• Control at higher Reynolds numbers.
33
34
The case of small deformations
34