Self-Cycling Fermentation: Bioprocessing for the -omics era Self-Cycling Fermentation: Bioprocessing

Self-Cycling Fermentation: Bioprocessing for the -omics era

Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Engineering

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Zachary J. Storms And

Dominic Sauvageau

BioPacific Rim Conference December 9, 2014

Microbial Cells as Factories

Zack Storms

Introduction

212/9/2014

The -omics Era: Expanding our understanding of microbial cells

Zack Storms

Introduction

312/9/2014

Genomics:

Gene function

(DNA)

Transcriptomics:

Gene expression (RNA)

Metabolomics:

Biochemical Reactions

How can we tailor large-scale bioprocessing to complement the knowledge we are gaining through –omics?

Biomass Production of E. coli during Self-Cycling Fermentation

Self-Cycling Fermentation

Zack Storms

Features of SCF

• Cyclical Semi-continuous Reactor

• Contents halved upon depletion of limiting nutrient – Replenished with fresh media

• Cycle period = cell doubling time

• Maintains exponential growth – Reproducible, stable

• Induces cell synchrony

Storms et al. (2012) Self-Cycling Operation Increases Productivity of Recombinant Protein in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 109: 2262-2270

412/9/2014

Cell Synchrony

Zack Storms

Asynchronous cell growth Ideal synchronized cell growth

Cell division occurs throughout entire cycle

Cell division occurs at infinitely small time interval in cycle

5

Features of SCF

12/9/2014

Growth of E. coli during a SCF Cycle

Zack Storms

• Cell division occurs in middle of cycle

• Synchrony Index ≈ 0.6-0.7

• Growth of culture behaves like individual cell

• Cell metabolism slows down – Doubling time ~150 minutes

Cell Density in synchronized cycle

Sauvageau D, Storms ZJ, Cooper DG (2010) Synchronized Populations of Escherichia coli Using Simplified Self-Cycling Fermentation. J Biotechnol. 149: 67-73.

6

Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation

Features of SCF

How can we use –omics to take advantage of these properties in large scale fermentation?

12/9/2014

Studies on synchronized cells with Bacteriophages

Zack Storms

• How does cell division cycle effect cell productivity?

• Bacteriophage infections at different points in cell division cycle

• Parameters measured – Burst size: phages/cell

– Lysis time: phage incubation period

– Intracellular RNA and DNA

Storms ZJ, Brown T, Cooper DG, Sauvageau D, Leask RL (2014) Impact of the cell life-cycle on bacteriophage T4 infection FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 353: 63-68.

7

Increasing productivity using SCF

Cell Growth and

DNA Replication

Cell Division

12/9/2014

Studies on synchronized cells with Bacteriophages

Zack Storms

• How does cell division cycle effect cell productivity?

• Burst size largest immediately preceding cell division

• Lysis time shortest immediately preceding cell division

Storms ZJ, Brown T, Cooper DG, Sauvageau D, Leask RL (2014) Impact of the cell life-cycle on bacteriophage T4 infection FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 353: 63-68.

8

Increasing productivity using SCF

Results from cells infected by phage T4 at different points in their cell division cycle

Cell Division

12/9/2014

Studies on synchronized cells with Bacteriophages

Zack Storms

• How does cell division cycle effect cell productivity?

• Burst size largest immediately preceding cell division

• Lysis time shortest immediately preceding cell division

• Productivity highest immediately preceding cell division

9

Increasing productivity using SCF

Phage productivity of cells infected by phage T4 at different points in their cell division cycle

Cell Division

12/9/2014

Storms ZJ, Brown T, Cooper DG, Sauvageau D, Leask RL (2014) Impact of the cell life-cycle on bacteriophage T4 infection FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 353: 63-68.

Studies on synchronized cells with Bacteriophages

Zack Storms

Storms ZJ, Brown T, Cooper DG, Sauvageau D, Leask RL (2014) Impact of the cell life-cycle on bacteriophage T4 infection FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 353: 63-68.

10

Increasing productivity using SCF

12/9/2014

• Why does cell productivity change with cell age?

• Intracellular resources – RNA – Protein Synthesizing System – Transcriptomics

• Burst size positively correlated to total cellular RNA

• Lysis time negatively correlated to total cellular RNA

• Productivity positively correlated with cellular RNA

Zack Storms

• Synchronized host: – Maintains same level of

phage production

– Lower cell concentration

– The number of phages per cell (burst size) is larger for a synchronized culture

Sauvageau D and Cooper DG. (2010) Two-stage, self cycling process for the production of bacteriophages Microbial Cell Factories, 9:81

11

Increasing productivity using SCF

Self-Cycling Fermentation

Bacteriophage Production

Implications for large scale production processes: bacteriophage production

Infected E. coli cultures

12/9/2014

Implications for large scale production processes: recombinant protein production

• β-galactosidase production using recombinant bacteriophage – Induce production at different time

points in SCF cycle

Zack Storms 12

Storms et al. (2012) Self-Cycling Operation Increases Productivity of Recombinant Protein in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 109: 2262-2270

Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation

Increasing productivity using SCF

12/9/2014

0.0E+00

1.0E+04

2.0E+04

3.0E+04

4.0E+04

5.0E+04

6.0E+04

7.0E+04

0 50 100 150 200 250

S p

e c

if ic

I n

te g

ra te

d P

ro d

u c

ti v it

y

(U /L

/h /O

D )

Induction Time (minutes) (Cell Age)

Unsynchronized Culture

Implications for large scale production processes: recombinant protein production

• β-galactosidase production using recombinant bacteriophage – Induce production at different time

points in SCF cycle

• Productivity of synchronized cultures

– Maximum in productivity 50% larger than in non-synchronized culture

– Maximum occurs 45 minutes earlier

Zack Storms 13

Storms et al. (2012) Self-Cycling Operation Increases Productivity of Recombinant Protein in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 109: 2262-2270

Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation

Increasing productivity using SCF

12/9/2014

0.0E+00

1.0E+04

2.0E+04

3.0E+04

4.0E+04

5.0E+04

6.0E+04

7.0E+04

0 50 100 150 200 250

S p

e c

if ic

I n

te g

ra te

d P

ro d

u c

ti v it

y

(U /L

/h /O

D )

Induction Time (minutes) (Cell Age)

Unsynchronized Culture

Synchronized Culture

Implications for large scale production processes: recombinant protein production

• β-galactosidase production using recombinant bacteriophage – Induce production at different time

points in SCF cycle

• Productivity of synchronized cultures

– Maximum in productivity 50% larger than in non-synchronized culture

– Maximum occurs 45 minutes earlier

– Two distinct maxima observed

Zack Storms 14

Storms et al. (2012) Self-Cycling Operation Increases Productivity of Recombinant Protein in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 109: 2262-2270

Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation

Increasing productivity using SCF

12/9/2014

0.0E+00

1.0E+04

2.0E+04

3.0E+04

4.0E+04

5.0E+04

6.0E+04

7.0E+04

0 50 100 150 200 250

S p

e c

if ic

I n

te g

ra te

d P

ro d

u c

ti v it

y

(U /L

/h /O

D )

Induction Time (minutes) (Cell Age)

Synchronized Culture

Implications for large scale production processes: recombinant protein production

• β-galactosidase production using recombinant bacteriophage

• Productivity of synchronized cultures

– Maximum in productivity 50% larger than in non-synchronized culture

– Maximum occurs 45 minutes earlier

– Two distinct maxima observed • Before and after cell division

Zack Storms 15

Storms et al. (2012) Self-Cycling Operation Increases Productivity of Recombinant Protein in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 109: 2262-2270

Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation

Increasing productivity using SCF

12/9/2014