Upload
dinhdung
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Gas Well Deliquification WorkshopSheraton Hotel, Denver, Colorado
February 23 - 26, 2009
Selection and Application of Chemical Foamers for Offshore, North Sea
Johannes Visser - Britannia Operator Limited
Martin J. Willis* - Nalco Limited
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
2
Summary• Chemical foamer, Sci-Foam EC7007A, has been
successfully applied offshore North Sea in a condensate loaded well
• Performance has demonstrated clear benefits to well production;– Gas rates, liquids production and flowing time
• Product selection was a result of the robust Nalco 5 step lift process;– Extensive laboratory testing– Well specific modeling– Liaising with the operators to fully understand the issues and
concerns
• Utilising surfactant technology developed specifically for addressing liquid loading
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
3
Contents
• Background
• Assessing Well Suitability
• Product Selection & Recommendation
• Field Trials
• The Future
• Summary
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
4
Background• Britannia Gas Condensate Wells
– Located in UK sector of the North Sea• Block UK 16/26
– Packed completions fitted with SSVs
– Depth circa. 14,000ft
– Numerous wells showing signs of loading • >10 wells were submitted • Some already on intermittent production
– Previous attempts to use artificial lift deemed unsuccessful
– Approach to Nalco for a “Best In Class” foamer
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
5
Rate / Mscf/d A B C D E F GWell
Tubing regim
e Water critical rate 3,208 2,208 2,276 1,866 3,186 3,175 3,383Water + Condensate critical rate 2,636 1,826 1,889 1,287 2,635 2,617 2,781Water + Foam critical rate 2,218 1,512 1,565 1,072 2,189 2,184 2,347Production rate* 11,400 6,000 5,100 5,200 6,000 5,000 9,600% above Critical 255 172 124 179 88 57 184Tubing re
gime
Casing re
gime Water critical rate 5,375 5,234 5,557 4,555 5,183 10,130 10,652
Water + Condensate critical rate 4,416 4,328 4,611 3,770 4,286 8,352 8,758Water + Foam critical rate 3,716 3,585 3,821 2,618 3,561 6,968 7,389Production rate* 11,400 6,000 5,100 5,200 6,000 5,000 9,600% above Critical 112 15 -8 14 16 -51 -10Cas
ing regim
e
* Production rates are recorded from low pressure system, not standard conditions
Assessing Well Suitability
• Nalco’s managed foamer program
• Gathered well data to run the model
• Output inferred loading in the casing region
.
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
6
Product Selection (1 of 2)• Products available
• Key parameter was foamer testing
Water / g 5BOL Condensate / g 95N2 Flowrate / LPM 2Temperature / °C 24
Unloading conditions
Commercial Product Name
Lo Temp Stability
Hi Temp Stability
Flash Point
CEFAS Registered
EC7005A -10°C 140°C >65°C Green Gold
EC7007A -10°C 140°C >65°C Green Gold
EC7008A -15°C 130°C >65°C Red, Sub-list Gold
To be tested if green products unsuccessful
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
7
Product Selection (2 of 2)
• Also completed additional testing;
– Viscosity profiles• Across wide temperature
range viscosity remained low
– Defoamer compatibility• Product identified to work at
levels <10% of foamer treat rate
– Chemical compatibility• Static tests showed
compatibility with majority of other system chemicals
• Only incompatibility was with an oil based product
– Material compatibility• Compatible with a range of
metals, elastomers and packing materials
– Emulsification tendency• No significant tendency
– Partitioning study• Demonstrated the foamer
will favour the water phase
– Core flood study• Various tests were
conducted reporting no impact on gas flow
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
8
Product Recommendation
Selecting the right product is key to prevent topside upsets
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
9
– Excellent foaming performance evident– Meets other product requirements– Sub-free and gold HQ banding to meet “green” North Sea target
Product Recommendation – Sci-Foam EC7007A
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00
Time (min)
Upl
oad
Wei
ght (
g)
Blank
EC7007A5000ppm
EC7007A10000ppm
EC7007A15000ppm
EC7005A5000ppm
EC7005A10000ppm
EC7005A15000ppm
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
10
Trial Proposal
• Topside squirt trial– Ensure no impact on separation performance or oil in
water levels• OiW regulated at 30 mg/l for overboard discharge in the
North Sea
• Downhole batch treatment
• Continuous application
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
11
Topside Squirt Test• Applied volume of
foamer and anti-foam across the test separator in live well fluids
– Foamer volumes where between 5-50 l/hour
– Defoamer at 0.1 l/hour
• Results show no negative impact on OiW and maintained standard overboard discharge
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
23/0
8/20
08, 1
3:20
, bas
elin
e
23/0
8/20
08, 1
7:00
, bas
elin
e
24/0
8/20
08, 0
6:00
, bas
elin
e
24/0
8/20
08, 0
9:00
, bas
elin
e
24/0
8/20
08, 1
2:25
, 0.1
/ 5
L pe
r hr
24/0
8/20
08, 1
4:00
, 0.1
/ 10
L pe
r hr
24/0
8/20
08, 1
5:40
, 0.1
/ 15
L pe
r hr
24/0
8/20
08, 1
7:15
, 0 /
15L
per h
r
24/0
8/20
08, 1
8:00
, 0.1
/ 20
L pe
r hr
24/0
8/20
08, 2
0:00
, 0.1
/ 20
L pe
r hr
24/0
8/20
08, 2
0:45
, 0.1
/ 20
L pe
r hr
25/0
8/20
08, 0
6:00
, bas
elin
e
25/0
8/20
08, 0
8:30
, 0.1
/ 25
L pe
r hr
25/0
8/20
08, 0
8:55
, 0.1
/ 25
L pe
r hr
25/0
8/20
08, 1
0:20
, 0.1
/ 30
L pe
r hr
25/0
8/20
08, 1
2:10
, 0 /
30L
per h
r
25/0
8/20
08, 1
3:05
, 0 /
30L
per h
r
25/0
8/20
08, 1
4:30
, 0.1
/ 35
L pe
r hr
25/0
8/20
08, 1
4:55
, 0.1
/ 35
L pe
r hr
25/0
8/20
08, 1
6:30
, 0.1
/ 40
L pe
r hr
25/0
8/20
08, 1
8:40
, 0.1
/ 50
L pe
r hr
Oil
in w
ater
con
tent
(mg/
l)
Oil in water content at Degasser and MP Separator Outlets
DegasserMP
Separator
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
12
Downhole Batch Treatment (1 of 2)• 320 litres / 84 gals (~30,000ppm of calculated liquid volume) of
foamer was pumped down the production tubing of well G
• Well shut-in for 20 hours and allowed to build up to a wellhead pressure of 56 bar / 812 psi
• Well flowed back into HP separator– Only initial surge observed, well did not kick
• Shut-in again for 1.5 hour until the wellhead pressure reached 56 bar / 812 psi
• Well flowed into MP separator– significant kick observed
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
13
Downhole Batch Treatment (2 of 2)C
umul
ativ
e co
nden
sate
/ B
PD
Gas
rate
/ m
msc
f/d
Oct 08 Chemical clean up
Jul 08 Clean up
Oct 08 Gas rate
Jul 08 Gas rate
Variable Previous flow back
Trial results % Gain
Condensate within 30mins / bbls 5 40 700Gas rate after 30mins / mmscfd 5 6.5 30
Condensate after 12 hours / bbls 50 81 62Well uptime / days 6-8 63 >685
North Sea Field Trial - DH Batch
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
14
The Future
• Britannia is considering additional batch treatments – Condensate dominant wells– Water loaded wells
• Britannia is currently reviewing potential for continuous foamer application– Capillary string material and performance compatibility
completed• Passed all the material compatibilities• Showed product stability at 200°C, 7000psi for ~4 hours
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
15
Summary• Chemical foamer, Sci-Foam EC7007A, has been
successfully applied offshore North Sea in a condensate loaded well
• Performance has demonstrated clear benefits to well production;– Gas rates, liquids production and flowing time
• Product selection was a result of the robust Nalco 5 step lift process;– Extensive laboratory testing– Well specific modeling– Liaising with the operators to fully understand the issues and
concerns
• Utilising surfactant technology developed specifically for addressing liquid loading
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
16
Acknowledgements
• The authors wish to thank;– Britannia Operator Limited and their Co-Venturers– Nalco Company
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
17
CopyrightRights to this presentation are owned by the company(ies) and/or author(s) listed on the title page. By submitting this presentation to the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop, they grant to the Workshop, the Artificial Lift Research and Development Council (ALRDC), and the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course (SWPSC), rights to:
– Display the presentation at the Workshop.– Place it on the www.alrdc.com web site, with access to the site to be
as directed by the Workshop Steering Committee.– Place it on a CD for distribution and/or sale as directed by the
Workshop Steering Committee.Other uses of this presentation are prohibited without the expressed written permission of the company(ies) and/or author(s) who own it and the Workshop Steering Committee.
Feb. 23 - 26, 2009 2009 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Denver, Colorado
18
DisclaimerThe Artificial Lift Research and Development Council and its officers and trustees, and the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Steering Committee members, and their supporting organizations and companies (here-in-after referred to as the Sponsoring Organizations), and the author(s) of this Technical Presentation or Continuing Education Training Course and their company(ies), provide this presentation and/or training material at the Gas Well Deliquification Workshop "as is" without any warranty of any kind, express or implied, as to the accuracy of the information or the products or services referred to by any presenter (in so far as such warranties may be excluded under any relevant law) and these members and their companies will not be liable for unlawful actions and any losses or damage that may result from use of any presentation as a consequence of any inaccuracies in, or any omission from, the information which therein may be contained.The views, opinions, and conclusions expressed in these presentations and/or training materials are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Sponsoring Organizations. The author is solely responsible for the content of the materials.The Sponsoring Organizations cannot and do not warrant the accuracy of these documents beyond the source documents, although we do make every attempt to work from authoritative sources. The Sponsoring Organizations provide these presentations and/or training materials as a service. The Sponsoring Organizations make no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the presentations and/or training materials, or any part thereof, including any warrantees of title, non-infringement of copyright or patent rights of others, merchantability, or fitness or suitability for any purpose.