Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    1/33

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    2/33

    especiall% after hes trapped his listener with the 2!estion' ;+h% are %o! la!ghing

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    3/33

    C!t dont %o! feel o!t of place among so man% scientists< So man% historians<

    SB*#S

    /o, beca!se # am attracted b% people whose interests are not in m% own area.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Do %o! think theres an advantage)as # think avaf% wo!ld probabl% have tho!ght)to

     being in dialog!e with historians< #n other words, do %o! feel that histor% has something

    partic!lar to sa% to the poet<

    SB*#S

    #f %o! remember, avaf% was proud  of having a sense of histor%. He !sed to sa%' ;# am a

    man of histor%=)something like that, # dont remember the e3act 2!otation. # am not that wa%

     b!t still, # feel the press!re of histor%. #n another wa%, perhaps' more m%thological, more

    abstract, or more concrete . . . # dont know.

    #/(*?#+* 

    How abo!t the relation of the 0reek poet to his partic!lar historical tradition< -o! once said

    that there is no ancient 0reece in 0reece. +hat did %o! mean b% that e3actl%<

    SB*#S

    # meant 0reece is a contin!o!s process. #n nglish the e3pression ;ancient 0reece= incl!des

    the meaning of ;finished,= whereas for !s 0reece goes on living, for better or for worse it

    is in life, has not e3pired %et. (hat is a fact. Ane can make the same arg!ment when one

    disc!sses the pron!nciation of ancient 0reek. -o!r scholars in $merica or in ngland or in

    Brance ma% be 2!ite right in adopting the rasmic pron!nciation' for them 0reek is a dead

    lang!age b!t for !s it is another stor%. (he fact is, %o! consider that ancient 0reek has

    terminated its f!nction at a certain point, and this enables %o! to prono!nce it)with m% regrets

    )in an arbitrar% wa%.

    #/(*?#+* 

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    4/33

    (hen %o! obvio!sl% see the 0reek tradition in lang!age, as well as in other things, as a

    contin!o!s process. (hat is not the belief of some classical and C%7antine scholars in this

    co!ntr%)and, # s!ppose, elsewhere.

    SB*#S

     -o! know wh% that happens< Ceca!se the s!bect, the histor%, of 0reece is so large that each

    scholar limits himself to a certain period or branch, and nothing e3ists o!tside of it. Bor

    e3ample, 0ibbon considered that a tho!sand %ears of life were a decline. How can a people be in

    decline for a tho!sand %ears< $fter all, between the Homeric poems and the birth of hrist eight

    h!ndred %ears elapsed)or something like that)and then pres!mabl% there were a tho!sand

     %ears of decline.

    #/(*?#+* 

    An the 2!estion of the 0reek poets relation to his tradition, it has alwa%s seemed to me that

    the 0reek poet has an advantage over his $nglo"Sa3on co!nterpart who makes !se of 0reek

    m%tholog% and sometimes even of 0reek landscape. # remember %ears ago when # was writing a

    thesis on what # tho!ght were nglish infl!ences in the poetr% of avaf% and Seferis, # asked %o!

    abo!t certain images that crop !p in %o!r landscape, for e3ample, the s%mbolic meaning of the

    stat!es that appear in %o!r work. -o! t!rned to me and said' ;C!t those are real stat!es. (he%

    e3isted in a landscape # had seen.= +hat # think %o! were sa%ing is that %o! alwa%s start with the

    fact of a living, act!al setting and move from there to an% !niversal meaning that might be

    contained in it.

    SB*#S

     $n ill!stration of that from someone who is a specialist in classical stat!es came the other

    da% from an nglish scholar who was lect!ring abo!t the stat!ar% of the &arthenon. # went !p to

    congrat!late him after his lect!re, and he said to me, as # remember' ;C!t %o! have a line which

    e3presses something of what # meant when %o! sa% the stat!es are not the r!ins)we are the

    r!ins.= # mean # was astonished that a scholar of his caliber was !sing a line from me to

    ill!strate a point.

    #/(*?#+* 

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    5/33

    (he imager% that a poet gets from his childhood is something weve disc!ssed before. -o!

    once disting!ished %o!rself from the average nglishman b% s!ggesting that donke%s probabl%

    did for %o! what footballs and cars might do for them. # remember %o! also talked abo!t the sea

    and the sailors of %o!r native village near Sm%rna.

    SB*#S

     -o! know, the strange thing abo!t imager% is that a great deal of it is s!bconscio!s, and

    sometimes it appears in a poem, and nobod% knows wherefrom this emerged. C!t it is rooted, #

    am certain, in the poets s!bconscio!s life, often of his childhood, and thats wh% # think it is

    decisive for a poet' the childhood that he has lived.

    # think there are two different things f!nctioning' conscio!s and s!bconscio!s memor%. #

    think the wa% of poetr% is to draw from the s!bconscio!s. #t is not the wa% %o! write %o!r

    memoirs, lets sa%, or the wa% %o! tr% to remember %o!r past, %o!r earl% life. # remember man%

    things from m% childhood which did  impress me. Bor instance, when # was a child # discovered

    somewhere in a corner of a sort of b!ngalow we had in m% grandmothers garden)at the place

     where we !sed to spend o!r s!mmers)# discovered a compass from a ship which, as # learned

    afterwards, belonged to m% grandfather. $nd that strange instr!ment)# think # destro%ed it in

    the end b% e3amining and re"e3amining it, taking it apart and p!tting it back together and then

    taking it apart again)became something m%thical for me. Ar again, when a!t!mn approached,

     when there wo!ld be a rather strong wind, and the fishing barges wo!ld have to sail thro!gh

    ro!gh weather, we wo!ld alwa%s be glad when the% were at last anchored, and m% mother wo!ld

    sa% to someone among the fishermen whod gone o!t' ;$h, bravo, %o!ve come thro!gh ro!gh

     weather= and he wo!ld answer' ;adam, %o! know, we alwa%s sail with haron at o!r side.=

    (hats moving to me. &erhaps when # wrote abo!t Ul%sses in that earl% poem %o!ve commented

    on E;Upon a Boreign ?erse=F)perhaps # had in mind somebod% like that fisherman. (hose

    ;certain old sailors from m% childhood= who wo!ld recite the Erotokritos. #n an% case, # think it

    is alwa%s a bit dangero!s to make !nconscio!s images conscio!s, to bring them o!t into the

    light, beca!se, %o! know, the% dr% o!t immediatel%.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Have %o! felt an% b!rden from having spent so man% %ears writing for a tin% a!dience)an

    a!dience so small in the earl% %ears of %o!r career that %o! had to p!blish %o!r work at %o!r own

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    6/33

    e3pense and iss!ed something !nder three h!ndred copies of each vol!me< (hat is a sit!ation

    2!ite !nfamiliar to an established $merican poet.

    SB*#S

    #ll give %o! an e3ample. +hen # p!blished m% first vol!me,  Strophe ETheTurning Point F, #

    iss!ed 1G copies. (hat was in 19I1. $nd # remember that in 19I9 there were still copies

    available at the bookseller)copies that # withdrew from circ!lation so that # co!ld bring o!t a

    new edition of the vol!me in 19J. C!t # m!st sa% that soon after that things began to change a

     bit. +hen # left for g%pt after the collapse of 0reece in the war against 0erman%, # left behind

    me three editions of m% work) Log Book I, Mythistorema, and Book of Exerises, besides the

    earlier vol!mes !istern and Strophe)left them there all brand new, witho!t having sold a single

    cop% before # sailed for rete and airo with the 0reek government in e3ile, as %o! know. D!ringm% absence ever%thing was sold o!t. +hen # came back, no copies remained. (he foreign

    occ!pation)enem% occ!pation)had given the 0reek p!blic the opport!nit% of concentration

    and reading. $nd # reckoned that when # ret!rned at the end of the occ!pation # was m!ch

     better known in 0reece than before.

    #/(*?#+* 

    #ts a ver% strange phenomenon, the revival of interest in poetr% d!ring the period of the

    occ!pation in 0reece. #ve heard abo!t this from other poets' 0atsos and l%tis, for e3ample.

    &oetr% became an activit% that bro!ght together the $thenian intellect!als for readings and

    disc!ssion, so that in a wa% it became the richest period for poetr% in this cent!r% after the

    period of the thirties.

    SB*#S

    l%tis p!blished his book d!ring the occ!pation, and 0atsos his' # mean the

    famo!s "morgos came o!t d!ring the occ!pationK

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat happened after the occ!pation< +h% was there silence for so long among the leading

    poets

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    7/33

    SB*#S

    #t wasnt silence. (imes had changed, and hori7ons had widened, and ever%bod% tried to see

    more of life o!tside the co!ntr% the% were tr%ing to find new modes of e3pression.

    #/(*?#+* 

    # wonder if %o! have felt an%thing new and interesting thro!gh reading to large p!blic

    a!diences in this co!ntr%. (he evidence of friends of mine who have no knowledge at all of

    0reek is that the% have capt!red, from %o!r reading in 0reek, a different sense of the poetr%s

    rh%thm from what the% get o!t of m% reading in nglish.

    SB*#S

    (hat is ver% important. C!t # can sa% something more abo!t this e3perience of reading in

     $merica. (he other da% another poet reacted b% sending me a poem abo!t m% reading. (hat is a

    new kind of response. C!t still, the important thing is to see reactions, not to be appla!ded or

    not appla!ded.

    #/(*?#+* 

     $fter %o!r reading at *!tgers this fall, someone in the a!dience asked %o! what %o! tho!ght

    of the nglish translations of %o!r poetr%, and %o! went on to make genero!s gest!res towards

     %o!r nglish translators, b!t then %o! added' ;Af co!rse the best translation of m% poetr% is in

    hinese, a lang!age which # dont !nderstand at all.=

    SB*#S

    #t isnt diffic!lt to elaborate on that beca!se, %o! know, # feel in lang!ages that # know,

    perhaps beca!se # know them too well 4not nglish, b!t in Brench, for e3ample, which # know

    reall% well5 that there are other possibilities in the translation. Bor hinese there are no otherpossibilities. C!t translating)#m changing the 2!estion a little bit)is interesting alwa%s

     beca!se it is a means of controlling %o!r own lang!age. /ow of co!rse the nglish lang!age is a

    more stable lang!age than o!rs we have to create o!rs, so to speak, all the time we are writing.

    #/(*?#+* 

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    8/33

    &o!nd said that translation is a means for a writer to sharpen contin!all% his awareness of

    his own lang!age, and he advised %o!ng poets to translate whenever the% co!ld.

    SB*#S

    &rovided %o! dont overdo it, # think it is alwa%s !sef!l.

    #/(*?#+* 

     -o! are a poet who writes in a lang!age which few people know o!tside 0reece. # wonder if

     %o! feel an% resentment of the fact that %o! are known in the world of poetr% o!tside %o!r own

    co!ntr% largel% thro!gh translation.

    SB*#S

    (here are compensations. Bor e3ample, abo!t a %ear ago, # received a letter from an

     $merican sa%ing to me' ;+ell, # have learned modern 0reek in order to read Seferis.= (hats a

    great compliment, # think. #t is m!ch more personal than the case of a man who learns a foreign

    lang!age at school, isnt it< #ve heard other people sa%' ;+ell, %o! know, we learned o!r 0reek

    from %o!r poems.= $ great reward. $nd then # sho!ld add, perhaps, this sit!ation of not having a

     ver% large a!dience has something good in it, too. # mean, that it ed!cates %o! in a certain wa%'

    not to consider that great a!diences are the most important reward on this earth. # consider that

    even if # have three people who read me, # mean reall% read me, it is eno!gh. (hat reminds me of 

    a conversation # had once !pon a time d!ring the onl% glimpse # ever had of Henri icha!3. #t

     was when he had a stopover in $thens, coming from g%pt, # think. He came ashore while his

    ship was in &irae!s !st in order to have a look at the $cropolis. $nd he told me on that

    occasion' ;-o! know, m% dear, a man who has onl% one reader is not a writer. $ man who has

    two readers is not a writer, either. C!t a man who has three readers=)and he prono!nced ;three

    readers= as tho!gh the% were three million);that man is rea##y a writer.=

    #/(*?#+* 

     -o! said earlier there is a problem in 0reek of establishing a lang!age. (hats something

     which most $merican readers nat!rall% dont !nderstand. +e have a lang!age. A!r problem is

    alwa%s to stretch the lang!age which we have so that it somehow shows a new vitalit%. +hen %o!

    talk abo!t establishing or creating a lang!age, %o! mean something 2!ite different.

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    9/33

    SB*#S

     +eve had the calamit% of academic intervention. ark %o!, # mean from both the left and

    the right. #n the beginning we had the intervention of professors who wanted to transform o!r

    living lang!age into something abstract in order to reach some sort of ;idea= of a p!re lang!age.

    An the other side, we had the fight fordemotiki, as we call the pop!lar spoken lang!age. C!t this

    tradition)the professorial tradition)was so strong that there was a sort of academic mind

     which fo!ght activel% for both the p!ristic and the vernac!lar lang!age. (he best wa% to progress

    is b% forgetting all that academic intervention. Bor e3ample, # admire ver% m!ch the retan

    *enaissance. #n that period %o! find a whole poem)ten tho!sand lines, an enormo!s poem)

     where there is no strain at all, no effort at all the lang!age f!nctions 2!ite nat!rall%, witho!t

    an% flagrant tendenc% to be learned.

    #/(*?#+* 

    #ts interesting that %o! take an effortless poem for a model beca!se # remember that, in

    another conte3t, %o! described st%le as the diffic!lt% one enco!nters in e3pressing himself.

    SB*#S

    # said that in lect!ring abo!t akri%annis, who, as %o! know, never learned how to write or

    read !ntil the age of thirt%"five. +hen %o! see his man!script, it is like a wall)a wall b!ilt !p o!tof stones, one placed on top of the other. #t is ver% strange. Bor e3ample, he never !ses

    p!nct!ation at all. /o paragraphs. /othing. #t goes on like that. $nd %o! see that each word is

    added to another word like a stone on top of another stone. # mean, in an% case, that when %o!

    reall% feel something, %o! face the diffic!lt% of e3pressing it. $nd that, after all, forms %o!r st%le.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat are the diffic!lties %o!ve enco!ntered in establishing %o!r own st%le<

    SB*#S

    (hats another stor%. #n m% %o!th # worked ver% m!ch over the 0reek lang!age. 0lossaries,

    old te3ts, medieval te3ts, and things of that kind. C!t the diffic!lt% wasnt onl% in st!d%ing them

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    10/33

    the diffic!lt% was how to forget them and be nat!ral. # had the blessing, perhaps, of being

    nat!ral, # dont know. (hats for others to sa% . . .

    #/(*?#+* 

    # know %o! alwa%s considered it the first order of b!siness for a poet to tr% for econom% in

    st%le. (his seems to be in contrast to the dominant mode of %o!r predecessors)at least the

    mode of &alamas and Sikelianos.

    SB*#S

    (hats perhaps a local characteristic. # felt at the time of m% earl% efforts that in 0reece the%

     were too rhetorical, and # reacted against it. (hat was m% feeling. $nd # reacted against it in

    man% wa%s. Bor e3ample, in the !se of words, of adectives)especiall% compo!nd adectives,

     which # avoided. (o avoid certain things is deliberate with me, %o! know. % interest in

    e3pression was not so m!ch in the color of the lang!age, which 0reek has plent% of, b!t in

    precision above all and in order to be precise, %o! have to be spare in the !se of %o!r material.

     -o! remember that ?aler% said l%ricism is, after all, the development of an e3clamation, of an

    ;$h.= Bor me ;$h= is 2!ite eno!gh. # never tr% to elaborate on the e3clamation.

    #/(*?#+* 

    @et me p!rs!e the matter of st%le as process of !sing lang!age sparingl%. Do %o! agree that

    in %o!r own work there is a development, a f!rther econom% of means, between  Strophe and

    ever%thing that followed it<

    SB*#S

    Af co!rse. #t is not so m!ch a st%listic development as a sort of evol!tion. ver%thing

    evolves. # mean, one has to evolve)one has to see new things. Ane has to see other aspects and

    e3press these other aspects. ertainl% there is an evol!tion, b!t # dont see it as a ;development=

    in inverted commas. #f # had %ears more in front of me, # wo!ld perhaps write in another wa%,

    even in another st%le. # might again !se the strict line or rh%med verse, perhaps. #n poetr% %o!

    change the base of things from time to time in order to have a fresh e3pression. (he main thing

     %o! are looking for in poetr% is to avoid worn"o!t e3pressions. (hats the great problem.

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    11/33

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat abo!t the problem of developing a prose st%le< -o! are one of the ver% few poets in

    0reece who has had almost as strong an impact on the lang!age of prose criticism as %o!ve had

    on the lang!age of poetr%. Developing a live %et caref!l prose st%le m!st have been part of %o!r

    str!ggle from the beginning.

    SB*#S

     -es, b!t, %o! know, m% str!ggle was alwa%s for precision. (hat is at the base of it. $nd of

    co!rse in prose it appears more obvio!s)# mean the matter of econom%.

    #/(*?#+* 

    (his tape machine seems to have stopped recording. Sa% something and lets see if its still

     working properl%.

    SB*#S

     +allace Stevens was in an ins!rance compan%.

    #/(*?#+* 

    @ets hope it will go on with !s for a while. Ane of %o!r remarks which has interested me is

    abo!t the 2!estion of the relation between poetr% and p!blic service # think %o! said that the

    important thing was for the poet not to have a ob which was directl% connected with that of

     being a poet.

    SB*#S

    # didnt sa% the ;important= thing. # dont know, reall%, beca!se # cant speak for other

    people b!t for me at least, # s!ppose that it is a help not to be in a ob where # have to write as #

     write in m% notebooks or poetr% books. Bor e3ample, # am not a professor or a teacher or even a

    newspaperman. # prefer to have another occ!pation.

    #/(*?#+* 

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    12/33

     +as there an%thing in %o!r professional career)that is, the e3perience %o! had as a

    diplomat)which ma% have infl!enced in some wa% the imager% of %o!r poetr% or affected the

    partic!lar themes %o! chose to e3press<

    SB*#S

    # dont believe that an% themes or an% imager% were created b% m% ob, tho!gh # might

    mention)how did %o! translate it

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    13/33

    sho!ld be elaborated as feeling. # dont consider that $esch%l!s was making a propaganda pla%

     b% p!tting the s!ffering &ersians on stage, or desperate Ler3es, or the ghost of Dari!s, and so

    forth. An the contrar%, there was h!man compassion in it. Bor his enemies. /ot that hes not of

    co!rse glad that the 0reeks won the battle of Salamis. C!t even then he showed that Ler3es

    defeat was a sort of divine retrib!tion' a p!nishment for the h!bris that Ler3es committed in

    flagellating the sea. Since his h!bris was to flagellate the sea, he was p!nished e3actl% $y the sea

    in the battle of Salamis.

    #/(*?#+* 

    #s it possible to compare poetr% across national lines< Ar do we alwa%s have to make

    2!alitative comparisons strictl% within a single tradition<

    SB*#S

    # feel a sort of rel!ctance abo!t comparing poets. #t is ver% diffic!lt)even within the same

    tradition. (r% to compare Dante and $lfred, @ord (enn%son, for e3ample' +hat that wo!ld lead

    to, # dont know. Ar, in the Brench tradition, how can %o! compare *acine and ?ictor H!go< -o!

    have to go ver% deep, to the bottom of the tradition, in order to find some sort of common

    gro!nd where the comparison can fairl% take place. An the other hand, for e3ample, # m%self

    !sed -eats in m% Stockholm acceptance speech beca!se # had been reading, !st a few months

     before m% trip to Stockholm, ;(he Co!nt% of Sweden,= where he reco!nts the whole affair of his

    election to the /obel &ri7e' his trip to Stockholm, the ceremon%, and ever%thing. $nd there # felt

    a sort of relation with him as a h!man being)not as a poet b!t as a h!man being beca!se -eats

     belonged to a small co!ntr% with a great folklore tradition, a co!ntr% which, after all, had

    political t!rmoil. C% the wa%, theres another e3ample of a p!blic poet who doesnt write

    propaganda. He writes, for e3ample, a poem abo!t an #rish airman which isnt at all

    propaganda. ;(hose # fight # do not hate)= etc. Ar he writes ;(he Second oming.= (hat, too, is

    not propaganda' ;(he center cannot hold,= etc., which after all starts somewhere in #rish

    political life b!t it goes deeper, and thats the whole point, # think.

    #/(*?#+* 

     -o!ve mentioned at %o!r readings, in talking abo!t ;(he >ing of $sine,= the fact that it had

    taken %o! two %ears to find a wa% of writing abo!t that partic!lar e3perience, and then, at some

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    14/33

    point, after having given %o!r notes for that poem to a friend, %o! completed the final draft in

    one long evening. liot has implied that %o! finished the poem 4between ten &.. and three in

    the morning5 e3actl% beca!se %o! didnt have %o!r notes before %o!.

    SB*#S

    # had no notes. $nd he ma% have been right. # dont know. #n m% home in $thens, # have all

    m% papers and m% books. $nd # wonder if thats a helpf!l thing or not, if its not better to have

     !st a blank writing desk witho!t an% papers or an% books at all, where %o! can sit at reg!lar

    ho!rs ever% da%.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Do %o! normall% make notes on the e3perience of a poem before %o! write it<

    SB*#S

    Ah, there are man% wa%s. Sometimes # do. Sometimes # do not. (here are things which %o!

    have to remember, and # have to record these somewhere, so of co!rse # make notes. Bor

    e3ample, there is a poem where # have !sed the chronographer akhairas, where it was

    impossible to avoid referring to that stor% abo!t the demon of fornication.

    #/(*?#+* 

    # didnt mean notes once the poem has been composed in %o!r mind, b!t notes on the

    e3perience which, in effect, becomes the poem.

    SB*#S

    /o, # dont do that. +hen # sa% notes, # mean there are those on the material, notes which

    are needed beca!se the% are descriptive. $nd there are notes that are ideas, poetical ideas. Bor

    e3ample, poetical e3pressions, poetical !tterances, that is the kind of notes # mean. #f # were to

     write a poem abo!t %o!)# might make a note that ;ike has ceased to smoke for man% %ears.= #

    mean if the things so!nd well in 0reek to m% ear, # co!ld write it. (hats all)things which are

    indifferent to other people. (hese # call poetical notes. Sometimes # disregard them altogether,

    and sometimes # go back to them. Sometimes, when the% are 2!ite forgotten, b% having a

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    15/33

    glimpse at them, # sa%' ;Ah, that poem was rather interesting,= altho!gh the% dont sa% an%thing

    at all to the ordinar% person. Still, the% take me back to a certain atmosphere which, in the

    meantime, has been working, elaborating, a form in m% mind.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Do %o! keep these notes or do %o! destro% them<

    SB*#S

    Ah, # destro% a lot. Some months ago in $thens)there was somebod%, a sort of Hellenist,

     who was interested in photographing notes. $nd # had the impression that # had kept m% notes

    on The !istern. # looked for them in all m% files, and it appeared to me then that # had destro%ed

    them. (he onl% thing that # fo!nd was the ;/otes for a +eek= which have been p!blished 2!ite

    recentl%)that is, the two missing poems from that gro!p.

    #/(*?#+* 

    #m sorr% abo!t that, in a wa%, beca!se # think The !istern is a poem that all of !s have

    fo!nd obsc!re in places, and the notes might have helped)might have helped me, an%wa%.

    SB*#S

    Dont complain abo!t it. (he% might have made the poem m!ch more obsc!re, %o! know.

    Bor e3ample, the general idea abo!t m% evol!tion in poetr% is' ;$h, %o! see, Seferis started with

    reg!lar lines, rh%mes, strict versification, and then he moved to free verse.= +hen # see m%

    notes, # see that the main poem of Strophe, the ;rotikos @ogos,= appears to be in ver% strict

     versification b!t m% notes show me that this poem was also written in free verse. # have fo!nd

    some of the first drafts.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +o!ld %o! ever consider p!blishing them<

    SB*#S

    C% 0od, no.

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    16/33

    #/(*?#+* 

    Do %o! think thats the reason liot was so caref!l abo!t not rediscovering the lost parts

    of The %aste Land, which have now been rediscovered<

    SB*#S

     +hen he told me the stor% abo!t the writing of The %aste Land, he seemed 2!ite desperate

    abo!t the man!scripts being lost. An the other hand, he also told me how !sef!l)he stressed

    that point)how usefu#  the intervention of &o!nd had reall% been.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Do %o! approve of p!blishing discarded things<

    SB*#S

    # dont know it depends. #t needs a great deal of tact. /ot b% the poet himself b!t b% his

    editors. #f the% p!blish them, the% tend to stress that the% are all"important discoveries, and #

    think this is bad. Averpla%ing it. (he editors and the philologists are alwa%s overdoing things, #

    think.

    #/(*?#+* 

    # know from a section of %o!r diar% which m% wife and # translated that %o!r relationship

     with liot was an important one in %o!r life in vario!s wa%s. # wonder if an% other literar%

    fig!res who are known in the +est have also been important to %o!. #m thinking partic!larl% of

    Henr% iller and @awrence D!rrell and ma%be others # dont know abo!t. #m thinking also of

     %o!r own compatriots' (heotokas and >atsimbalis, for e3ample.

    SB*#S

    D!rrell was m!ch %o!nger than me, %o! know. He was a ver% interesting %o!ng man when #

    met him. He was in his mid"twenties. # met him with Henr% iller. (he% came to $thens to see

    the oloss!s of aro!ssi, >atsimbalis. #t was on the da%)if m% memor% is correct)of the

    declaration of war.

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    17/33

    #/(*?#+* 

    C!t of co!rse >atsimbalis wasnt the oloss!s at that point.

    SB*#S

    /o, b!t iller was threatening to make him something ver% colossal.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +ell, he did.

    SB*#S

    #t was nice to meet them the% were, lets sa%, the first)or if not e3actl% the first, then the

    second or third)readers with an !nderstanding of what # was doing. Bor e3ample, one of them,

    iller or @arr%, told me after reading m% poems' ;-o! know what # like abo!t %o! is that %o!

    t!rn things inside o!t. $nd # mean that in the good  sense.= (hat was a ver% nice compliment for

    me at that time.

    #/(*?#+* 

    How did the% come to know %o!r poetr%<

    SB*#S

    How. Hm. (here were then in nglish onl% the translations of >atsimbalis. an!script

    translations, # mean.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hen the% came to $thens, wh% did the% go directl% to >atsimbalis< +h% was he the man whom the% approached< +as he well known as a literar% fig!re o!tside 0reece<

    SB*#S

    # dont know. #t was a matter of common friends, perhaps. He became a bigger literar%

    fig!re after The !o#ossus of Maroussi . $t that time he was more in contact than # was with the

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    18/33

    nglish and $merican literar% circles. (here was a sort of international bohemia, # might sa%, b%

    then in $thens. # mean on the eve of the war. # m!st add that >atsimbalis has that wonderf!l

    2!alit% of being witho!t evil intention in his heart. He might critici7e somebod%, b!t in a good"

    hearted wa%. $nd he believed that o!r co!ntr%, o!r little co!ntr%, was able to do something. He

    had that sort of belief.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat abo!t Henr% iller< How did %o! respond to him<

    SB*#S

    # like iller beca!se he is a ver% good"hearted man, and # think)e3c!se me for sa%ing so,

     b!t this is not a criticism' #t is great praise to sa% abo!t a writer that he is a good man)iller

    has a great deal of generosit% in him. Bor e3ample, when the moment came for him to go back to

     $merica 4he was advised to do so b% the $merican cons!l as an $merican national, he had to go

     back home beca!se the war was coming near5, he said to me one da%' ;% dear 0eorge, %o!ve

     been so kind to me, and # want to give %o! something.= $nd he prod!ced a diar% which he had

     been keeping d!ring his sta% in 0reece. # said' ;@ook here, Henr%. C!t after all, # know that %o!

    are going to write a book, and %o! cant write the book)# mean %o! might need %o!r notes.= He

    said' ;/o. $ll those things are here,= pointing to his head. # offered to make a t%pescript cop% for

    him to give him. ;/o,= he said, ;a gift m!st be whole.= +ell, thats a splendid wa% of behaving, #

    think. $nd # shall never forget that. (he diar% was a sort of first draft of the !o#ossus. C!t with

    more personal e3plosions. $nd more okes, of co!rse.

    #/(*?#+* 

    (here are 2!ite a few okes in the book, too.

    SB*#S

    (he trip to H%dra is splendid and the channel of &oros. *emember< % feeling abo!t iller

    is this' Af co!rse its a great thing to have an !nderstanding of the ancient a!thors b!t the first

    man # admired for not having an% classical preparation on going to 0reece is iller. (here is

    s!ch a freshness in him.

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    19/33

    #/(*?#+* 

    (he freshness of being read% to take it all in for the first time, %o! mean<

    SB*#S

    # s!ppose # was the first man to give him a te3t of $esch%l!s, when he decided to go to

    %cenae. C!t of co!rse he doesnt see an%thing from $esch%l!s he sees, in the plain of

     $rgos, redskins while he hears a a77 tr!mpeter. (hat is spontaneo!s behavior. $nd # admire it.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Ma77 tr!mpeter<

    SB*#S

    (he a77 tr!mpeter was inspired, # s!ppose, b% @o!is $rmstrong. Ceca!se he had heard

     $rmstrong on a small gramophone)a 2!ite elementar% gramophone)that # had then in m%

    home in $thens. # m%self had discovered a77 eight or ten %ears earlier . . .

    #/(*?#+* 

    Cefore illers arrival in 0reece. So %o! ta!ght him abo!t a77<

    SB*#S

    # was thirt%"two or thirt%"three at that time. $nd # became a a77 addict. # said to m%self,

    after all, %o! have discovered at the same time the importance of Cach)the great Cach)and  the

    importance of a77. # remember once # said to itropo!los' ;Bor me, m% dear maestro, a77 is

    one of the few wa%s left for !s to e3press feeling witho!t embarrassment.= (hat was in IG. /o,

    IJ.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +as there an% other writer abroad or in 0reece with whom %o! had a partic!larl% close

    relationship

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    20/33

    SB*#S

    #ts depends on what period %o! are referring to. Bor e3ample, # had ver% close relations with

    Sikelianos once !pon a time. # met him first in 199, tho!gh it did not become a close

    relationship !ntil after his illness and m% ret!rn to 0reece in 19JJ. D!ring his illness, Sikelianos

     was reall% remarkable, when he had all those crises in his health. +hile # was serving abroad, #

     wo!ld take advantage of m% trips to $thens to go and see him. Ane time # heard that he had !st

     been thro!gh a sort of cerebral hemorrhage. # fo!nd him at the theater wearing dark glasses)a

    premiNre at the /ational (heatre. # said' ;Ah $ngelo, # am so glad %o! are here, beca!se # had

    heard that %o! were not so well.= ;% dear,= he said, ;it is s!ch a splendid thing to have a little

    r!b% on the top of %o!r brain.= He meant the hemorrhage. # said to him' ;#t is a splendid thing

    that %o! can talk abo!t it that wa%. # am so glad.= He said' ;0eorge, look here. # shall tell %o! a

    stor% d!ring the ne3t intermission.= # approached him d!ring the ne3t intermission. He said'

    ;Have %o! read &oam$o# 

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    21/33

    Did %o! know &alamas< +hat kind of man was he<

    SB*#S

     -o! know, it is strange the memories # have kept of people. Bor e3ample, other peopleadmire Sikelianos for their own special reasons m%self, # was attracted b% those tragic and

    splendid moments of Sikelianoss last %ears. /ow &alamas' Ane of m% last memories of him was

     when # went to tell him good"b%e beca!se # was leaving shortl%. D!ring o!r conversation he

    referred to vario!s cra7% people mentioned in his poetr% and added' ;-o! know, we have man%

    mad people in m% famil%. # wanted once !pon a time to write a book called (o 0enos ton

    @o3on.= How can we translate that into nglish< ;(he breed of . . .=

    #/(*?#+* 

    Af madmen.

    SB*#S

    /ot 2!ite of madmen. Af ;obli2!e= men.

    #/(*?#+* 

    '$#i(ue men<

    SB*#S

    #m tr%ing to get the precise translation of the word.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Unbalanced men, perhaps.

    SB*#S

    # said to him' ;r. &alamas, it is a pit% %o! didn)t  write s!ch a book.= Ceca!se # tho!ght it

     wo!ld be a good book. He had an interesting sense of h!mor.

    #/(*?#+* 

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    22/33

     +hat do %o! consider &alamass most significant contrib!tion to 0reek literat!re<

    SB*#S

     +ell, # said it in *okimes, b!t # wo!ld repeat' his ver% important contrib!tion to the 0reeklang!age. # mean compared to his, avaf%s e3pression seems rather faint, altho!gh at certain

    moments more real.

    #/(*?#+* 

    C!t the min!te %o! sa% ;altho!gh more real= . . .

    SB*#S

     $gain, what # appreciate ver% m!ch in avaf% is his having started with terrificall% !nreal

    poems, and then, b% insistence and work, he fo!nd at last his own personal voice. He wrote ver%

     bad poems !p to his thirt%"fo!rth %ear. (he fail!re of those poems cannot be translated or

    comm!nicated to a foreign reader beca!se the lang!age of the translation is alwa%s bo!nd to

    improve them. (here is no possibilit% of translating that sort of thing faithf!ll%.

     -o! know, what # admire)let me p!t it m% own wa%)what # admire abo!t avaf% was this'

    He was a man who starts at a certain age with all signs showing that hes !nable to prod!ce

    an%thing of importance. $nd then, b% ref!sing and ref!sing things which are offered him, in the

    end he finds, he sees, as the% sa% he becomes certain that hes fo!nd his own e3pression. #ts a

    splendid e3ample of a man who, thro!gh his ref!sals, finds his wa%.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat did he ref!se precisel%<

    SB*#S

    3pressions, and the eas% things, verbosit%)that sort of thing. (ake his poem on ancient

    traged%, for e3ample. #t is ver% bad. #t is something !nbelievable. C% p!tting aside things like

    that, avaf% improves his e3pression !p to the end of his life, even !p to the last poem he wrote

    on the o!tskirts of $ntioch' the happenings between the hristians and M!lian. $nd # admire

    him for going on to the end like that. Hes a great e3ample. He had the co!rage, !p to the end of

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    23/33

    his life, not to admit certain things, to reect them. $nd thats wh% # have do!bts abo!t all these

    people who are tr%ing to p!t into circ!lation all the reected writings of avaf%, !nless one is

     ver% caref!l in reading him. -o! know, that needs a great deal of discernment.

    #/(*?#+* 

    (o t!rn now to the other well"known writer of the older generation, what abo!t

    >a7ant7akis< #n the U.S., avaf% is the poet whos respected b% those who are themselves poets)

     $!den, for instance, and man% of the important %o!nger $merican poets most of them know

    avaf%, and most of them have a s%mpathetic attit!de towards him. C!t among st!dents and

    among those who are !st beginning to learn abo!t literat!re, >a7ant7akis is b% far the most

    pop!lar 0reek writer, both as poet and as novelist. #ncreasingl% m% ob is to tr% to disc!ss

    >a7ant7akiss work)whether poetr% or fiction)witho!t diminishing him.

    SB*#S

    # dont wonder. (he thing is that one m!st have a possibilit% of being in contact with a

     writer, and that # cannot do in the case of >a7ant7akis)a terrible thing for me, %o! know. # m!st

    give %o! a warning as far as >a7ant7akis is concerned. An the one hand, there is his poetr%)

     what is called poetr%)and thats the 'dyssey se2!el, of co!rse, and his pla%s in verse and on

    the other hand, there is his prose' the novels. /ow, as far as the novels are concerned, # am not

    competent to !dge. # dont know how to speak abo!t the novels. # have not read all of them. #

    hear from people whom # tr!st that the% are ver% good, and the% ma% well $e ver% good. C!t

    the 'dyssey se2!el is another matter. (here, altho!gh %o! have interesting passages, #m afraid

    there is no poetr% in them. # sa% interesting passages)passages that are informative abo!t the

    man >a7ant7akis b!t # dont believe thats poetr%, at least not the poetr% # believe in.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat abo!t as ;idea,= 2!ite aside from poetic considerations< $s statement of a

    philosophical or religio!s position.

    SB*#S

    # dont know. # have no idea abo!t philosophical positions and worldviews. -o! know,

     whenever worldviews begin interfering with writing)# dont know. # prefer worldviews in the

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    24/33

    sort of dr%, rep!lsive, and 4# dont know how to p!t it5 prosaic wa%. # dont like people who tr% to

    e3press worldviews in writing poetr%. # remember once # had a reading in (hessalonike, and a

    philosopher stood !p and asked' ;C!t what, after all, r. Seferis, is %o!r worldview

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    25/33

    Ceardless an.= #t is a te3t written in the form of a mock ass that parodies the ass in a

    rather shocking wa%. #t am!ses me especiall% beca!se # dont see eno!gh light comic te3ts in o!r

    literat!re. ither people refrained from writing s!ch te3ts, or s!ch te3ts were eliminated b%

    somber"minded academics.

    #/(*?#+* 

    (hats an interesting remark. -o!ve said on another occasion that one thing which %o! find

    that the $nglo"Sa3on tradition has and no other tradition has is that element of nonsense)an

    element which is fairl% contin!o!s in o!r literat!re and which seems alwa%s to have e3isted in

    some form.

    SB*#S

    (he $nglo"Sa3on tradition is certainl% different from o!rs in that respect and # believe that

    no continental co!ntr% can claim the same kind of nonsense that dward @ear and @ewis arroll

    offer.

    #/(*?#+* 

     -o!ve spent three periods of service in ngland, spread over the best part of %o!r literar%

    career. Did %o! find it an especiall% congenial climate for work<

    SB*#S

    /ot reall%. $ ver% good place for me for writing was when # was in $lbania beca!se # was

    2!ite !nknown there, and ver% isolated at the same time # was near 0reece, # mean, from the

    lang!age point of view, and # co!ld !se m% free time to advantage. (here were no e3ha!sting

    social f!nctions.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat abo!t %o!r ac2!aintance with nglish men of letters d!ring %o!r earl% %ears in

    ngland< -o! met liot, of co!rse.

    SB*#S

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    26/33

    /o, # had a letter of introd!ction to liot, and # rang his office, b!t the secretar% informed

    me that liot was in the United States. #t was the time when he was harles liot /orton

    &rofessor at Harvard. # never met liot nor an% other writer in the beginning. Birst of all, # was

    rather sh% as a person then, it was a period when # was groping to find m% own f!rther

    e3pression. #n contrast, when # came to ngland after +orld +ar ##, m% period in the iddle

    ast had created a great man% friends among the nglish, and when # came back to ngland as

    o!nselor at the mbass%, # had no diffic!lt% at all beca!se b% then # was 2!ite well known in

    ngland. #t was !st after the p!blication of m% first translation into nglish, The +ing of "sine

    and 'ther Poems, in 19J8.

    #/(*?#+* 

    D!ring the period of %o!r first official visit to ngland, # wonder whether %o! had an%contact with nglish or $merican literat!re that %o! fo!nd partic!larl% e3citing along with

    liots work.

    SB*#S

    # think a ver% instr!ctive man for me, as # fo!nd o!t afterwards, was +. C. -eats. C!t #m

    talking abo!t -eatss earl% period. $fter all, %o! see, # had endeavored to e3ploit folklore m!ch

    as -eats did.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat abo!t $merican literat!re< Did %o! have an% favorite $merican a!thors in %o!r

    formative %ears<

    SB*#S

    #t is an odd thing for !s)# s!ppose that happens to ever%bod% abroad)# mean, one gets into

    literat!re and art b% chance. Bor e3ample, # dont remember on what occasion # came to know

     $rchibald ac@eish. $nd # translated him, as a matter of fact. # think # am the first man to have

    translated him in 0reece. (hen there was arianne oore. # had translated arianne oore

     before the war also. ;(he onke%s,= ;(o a Snail.=

    #/(*?#+* 

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    27/33

     -o! sa% %o! enco!ntered them b% accident. +hat was the accident<

    SB*#S

    Ah, # dont know. Some review where # saw the poems, # dont remember which one. $ndagain, 7ra &o!nd. # had alread% translated three !antos before the war.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hen # bro!ght !p $merican literat!re, # was reall% thinking abo!t the older $merican

    poets' +alt +hitman and mil% Dickinson, for e3ample.

    SB*#S

    # knew +alt +hitman. Ceca!se # started with Brench literat!re, and +alt +hitman was

    translated into Brench earl% eno!gh to be available to me. $nd then Henr% iller had an

    admiration for +hitman. He gave me man% hints abo!t him. (hat was 2!ite near the o!tbreak

    of the war, of co!rse. C!t # keep reading +hitman, as, in m% %o!th, # was reading dgar $llan

    &oe.

    #/(*?#+* 

    /ow that %o!re abo!t to go back to 0reece, do %o! have an%thing that %o! can sa% abo!t

    this partic!lar visit to the United States)which is %o!r third visit, if #m not mistaken)an%thing

    abo!t %o!r impressions of this co!ntr%<

    SB*#S

    % third visit to $merica has been the most important of all, this visit it has been more

    s!bstantial than the others. # dont believe that visiting /ew -ork helps %o! to !nderstand

     $merica. !rio!sl% eno!gh, # am now in the middle of a wood in a remote place, &rinceton, %et #

    have been able to see and !nderstand more of $merica from this remote place than if # were in a

    great center.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Af co!rse &rincetonians dont think &rinceton is all that remote.

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    28/33

    SB*#S

     +ell, # mean for others who are tr%ing, when the% are traveling, to see cosmopolitan centers,

    it might look remote. $nd after all, we travelers do not attend co!rses at the !niversit%.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hat have %o! seen in partic!lar d!ring this visit that has impressed %o!<

    SB*#S

    # dont want to mention things which impress me, %o! know. /obod% knows what impresses

    him on the spot. # mean it takes time to be elaborated somehow b% memor%.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Did %o! get some work done<

    SB*#S

     -es, # think # did. # cant sa%. # dont know how to speak abo!t work done. # have the

    impression that one can speak abo!t work done onl% when the work is finished. # am not

    inclined to speak abo!t m% work d!ring the period of elaboration. C!t in an% case, there is aninner feeling that %o! have not lost %o!r time. +hich is something. # mean, # want to be honest

     with %o!' # cannot mention an%thing reall% done. (he onl% thing # can mention to %o!)and #m

    not going to mention the s!bstance of it)is that # wrote a poem of two lines.

    #/(*?#+* 

     -o! !st received a vol!me of !gene carth%s poems. # fo!nd that rather moving' to

    discover that he had in fact written a vol!me of poems, and apparentl% d!ring his campaign last

     %ear.

    SB*#S

     -es, wh% not< # mean # can ver% well !nderstand that. #f there was a period of e!phoria,

    there is no reason wh% it sho!ldnt happen in poetr% at the same time that it happens in a

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    29/33

    chapter of politics. Ane of m% poems, ;(hr!sh,= was written after a terribl% active period of m%

    life)# mean, politicall% active, beca!se # was principal private secretar% to the *egent of 0reece

     !st before going to &oros. Af co!rse poems do not appear like an er!ption b% a volcano the%

    need preparation. $nd # think back on ;(hr!sh,= # can well mark notes, lines, which # had

    started writing d!ring the previo!s %ear, that most active %ear. /evertheless, # remember da%s

     when the ob was killing, beca!se # was not a politician, # was !st a servant, a p!blic servant,

    and # remember da%s when # started going to m% office at something like eight oclock in the

    morning and ret!rned back home the ne3t da% at five oclock in the morning witho!t having had

    an% meal or an% sleep. # mention that, of co!rse, not in order to move %o! b!t in order to show

     %o! that, after all, time was pressing then. C!t # was also writing. Af co!rse, there are other

    things which infl!enced m% work at that time, and among other things # might mention the fact

    that # ret!rned to m% co!ntr% after a great period of longing, at the end of the war.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Do %o! feel that, in addition to the lines %o! wrote, the poem was gestating in some

    significant wa% d!ring this ver% active period, so that when %o! went to &oros it co!ld come o!t

    as the coherent work it is in a relativel% short period< $ month of vacation, wasnt it<

    SB*#S

    (wo months. (he first long holida% # ever had d!ring m% career)the longest one.

    #/(*?#+* 

     $nd %o! were able to write the poem)and it is a long poem)in effect d!ring one sitting' the

    long sitting of that two"month vacation<

    SB*#S

    /o. -o!ll find the stor% of m% writing that poem in the diar% of this period, the period of J6

    on &oros. # !sed to go for a swim)no, first # wo!ld c!t wood in the garden 4which was a h!ge

    garden5, then go to the sea, and then work !p to night, !p to darkness, which started at seven

    oclock. $nd it is strange, %o! know, how)e3c!se me for talking like this)# noticed how one is

    cleansed progressivel% b% s!ch a life. Bor e3ample, # noticed that cleansing in m% dreams, as #

    mentioned in this diar% which has been recentl% p!blished.

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    30/33

    #/(*?#+* 

    # have onl% one more reall% general topic to bring !p. # wonder if %o! feel, as the res!lt of

     %o!r rather !ni2!e position in 0reek letters now)# s!ppose an% poet has a !ni2!e position in

    his co!ntr% once hes won the /obel &ri7e)if %o! feel that this in an% wa% has affected %o!r

    sense of a p!blic role as a man of letters as distinct from %o!r private role as a poet)an%

    responsibilit% %o! ma% feel towards %o!nger poets, for instance, towards the c!lt!ral life aro!nd

     %o!, or an% position %o! ma% sense %o! have to maintain in relation to %o!r co!ntr%.

    SB*#S

    # sho!ld from the beginning tell %o! 2!ite bl!ntl%)if # can sa% it in nglish)that the /obel

    &ri7e is an accident, no more than an accident. #ts not an appointment. $nd # have no feeling

    that # have been appointed to an% sort of f!nction. #t is !st an accident which one has to tr% and

    forget as soon as possible. Atherwise, if %o! are overda77led b% that sort of thing, %o! get lost

    and fo!nder. $t the time # won the pri7e, there was a sort of)how can # p!t it in nglish

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    31/33

    SB*#S

     +ell, %es, 0od bless them, b!t #m sorr% to sa% that # never felt # was the spokesman for

    an%thing or an%bod%. (here are no credentials which appoint an%bod% to be a spokesman for

    something. /ow others consider that a sort of f!nction which m!st be performed b!t # think

    that is, after all, wh% # have written so little. #ve never felt the obligation # have to consider onl%

    that # am not dried !p as a poet and to write. # mean that has been m% feeling from the ver%

     beginning. # remember when # p!blished m% first book, there were lots of people who said' ;r.

    Seferis, %o! m!st now tr% to show !s that %o! can do more.= # answered them' ;0entlemen, %o!

    m!st consider that ever% poem p!blished b% me is the last one. # never have an% feeling abo!t its

    contin!ation.= % last poem. $nd if # write another one, its a great blessing. /ow how m!ch #

    have worked in order to prod!ce the ne3t poem, or how m!ch # have not worked, is another

    matter)a private matter. Athers think that the% are the voices of the co!ntr%. $ll right. 0od

     bless them. $nd sometimes the%ve been ver% good in that f!nction.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Mo%ce felt that wa% a bit. #m thinking of the famo!s remark b% Stephen Dedal!s at the end

    of " Portrait of the "rtist as a Young Man, ;to forge in the smith% of m% so!l the !ncreated

    conscience of m% race.=

    SB*#S

    # can give %o! another e3ample. #n m% %o!th there was an enormo!s amo!nt of disc!ssion

    abo!t the problem of knowing, or tr%ing to define, what is 0reek and what is not 0reek)

    praising one thing as 0reek and condemning something else as !n"0reek' tr%ing, in short, to

    establish ;the real= 0reek tradition. So # wrote, ;0reekness is the s!m of the a!thentic works

     which are going to be prod!ced b% 0reeks.= +e cannot sa% that we have some works creating the

    conscience of 0reece. +e see a line, b!t s!rro!nded b% large margins of darkness. #t isnt simple.

    # dont know what m% voice is. #f others, for the time being, consider that it is theirconscience, som!ch the better. #ts !p to them to decide. #ts not !p to me to impose beca!se %o! cannot be a

    sort of dictator in these matters.

    #/(*?#+* 

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    32/33

    Some wo!ld think %o!rs the health% attit!de, b!t there are other people who feel that a

    /obel &ri7e winner, especiall% when he is the onl% one the co!ntr% has ever had, ought  to be a

    spokesman and a p!blic conscience.

    SB*#S

    #t might be so, b!t, after all, one takes the attit!de which is imposed on him b% his nat!re, or

     whatever %o! call it. $t the same time, # have never forced m%self to write an%thing which #

    didnt think necessar%. +hen # sa% ;necessar%,= # mean which # had  to e3press or be smothered.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +ell, #ve r!n o!t of 2!estions. Since %o! dont have an% grand advice for the %o!nger

    generation, #ve nothing more to ask %o!.

    SB*#S

    # hae advice.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Ah %o! do-  0ood.

    SB*#S

    # have the following advice to give to the %o!nger 0reek generation' to tr% to e3ercise

    themselves as m!ch as the% can in the modern 0reek lang!age. $nd not to write it !pside down.

    # have to tell them that in order to write, one m!st believe in what one does, not seeming to

     believe that one is believing something. (he% m!st remember that the onl% ob in which one

    cannot lie is poetr%. -o! cant lie in poetr%. #f %o! are a liar, %o!ll alwa%s be discovered. &erhaps

    now, perhaps in five %ears, in ten %ears, b!t %o! are going to be discovered event!all% if %o! are

    l%ing.

    #/(*?#+* 

     +hen %o! speak of l%ing, %o!re speaking first of all abo!t l%ing against %o!r emotional . . .

  • 8/17/2019 Seferis Interviewed by Edmond Keeley

    33/33

    SB*#S

    # dont know what # mean. &erhaps it is an emotional thing. #n the realit% of ones tho!ghts.

    # dont know. # mean, there is a special so!nd abo!t the solid, the so!nd thing. -o! knock

    against it, and it renders a sort of so!nd which proves that it is gen!ine.

    #/(*?#+* 

    Do %o! think ever% writer alwa%s knows himself whether the so!nd he hears is gen!ine or

    not<

    SB*#S

    /o. #t is diffic!lt to sa%. C!t he m!st somehow have an instinct)a g!iding instinct)which

    sa%s to him' ;% dear bo%, m% dear chap, be caref!l %o! are going to fall. -o! are e3aggerating

    at this moment.= $nd then, when he hears that, he sho!ld not take a dr!g in order to sa% to

    himself' ;+h%, %o! are all right, m% dear.= -o! are not all right, m% dear, at all.

     

    O &arenthetical dates indicate p!blication in translation.