Upload
vuongthu
View
225
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan
Five Year Multi Annual Plan 2013Common problems - Shared solutionsDecember 2012
SEETO Regional ParticipantsAlbania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Kosovo*
1
Five Year Multi‐Annual Plan 2013Common problems – Shared solutionsDecember 2012
SEETO COMPREHENSIVE NETWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN
2
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
FOREWORD
3
Angelina Zivkovic,Steering Committee Chairlady
The endorsement of the SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013 represents another building block in the regional transport cooperation in the South East Europe. Evidently shorter, sharper and streamlined in the presentation of the transport data analysis, project fiches and policy information, the MAP 2013 is our strongest tool for regional transport planning and consequently, for attracting transport investments.
Following the revision of the TEN-T Guidelines, we continued to work devotedly together to confirm that is not just by case that the SEETO Comprehensive Network is included into the TEN-T Comprehensive Network maps. The new Methodology for rating SEETO priority projects is the uppermost result achieved in that process, on the basis of which the latest SEETO priority project list has advanced into a genuinely credible and reliable reference when the regional infrastructure is concerned.
I take the opportunity of this occasion to express our gratitude to the European Commission and IFIs, which have supported and contributed towards the introduction of the new rating system. In that respect, the SEETO network intends to put even stronger efforts to increase the quality of the project fiches and proposals.
If one looks at the reforms made by the region in implementing the transport policy measures, a modest, but steady progress can be noted. More importantly, we are able to realise that investing in soft measures and enabling transfer of best practices through SEETO, has brought benefits to all. However, a lot needs to be done more, in order to catch up with the EU standards and level of services in the transport area, to improve the operations and to make the market more efficient. Therefore, we are committed to meeting the objectives of the SEETO Strategic Work Programme’s Project Tasks. Investing more today, will narrow the gaps of tomorrow.
Finally, I expect that the update of the Regional Transport Study (REBIS) in 2013 should give us the basis for further investments in removal of physical and non-physical barriers.
In the period of stringent economic measures, we must be smart in gaining more with investing less. That is possible only with effective coordination and intensified cooperation that extends beyond the borders of the region. As Croatia is entering the EU as of next year, we remain with the ultimate challenge and perspective - to fully integrate and become part of the common European transport system.
4
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
5
SEETO Regional Cooperation plays a vital role in the process of transport system development in the South East Europe focusing not only on infrastructure development but on horizontal measures as an integrated part of the system as well. Development of the SEETO Comprehensive Network up to the TEN-T standards and further integration of the South East European Transport System in the European remains a prevailing goal of the cooperation. Thus, the SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013 is made based on the requirements stated in the MoU as well as on the main needs addressed by the Regional Participants, the European Commission and the Financial Institutions that jointly participate in the SEETO Cooperation.
The focus of MAP 2013 is put on the analyses of the overall transport system reflecting to date achievements of the SEETO Cooperation together with the evaluation and presentation of main priority projects on the SEETO Comprehensive Network. As stated in the first chapter, it provides strong basis for further determination on the SEETO Comprehensive Network development at regional level, approaching the standards established at European level.
The MAP 2013 second chapter provides a detailed analysis of the SEETO Comprehensive Network developments that occurred in the previous year. Each transport mode is elaborated separately throughout main aspects occurred in regulatory regimes, new infrastructure developments and traffic trends. Analyses of the current state of the SEETO Comprehensive Network together with identification of less developed segments which require additional focus are presented.
The third chapter presents an overall assessment of investment trends in the South East European region in the 2007-2011 period showing positive trends in mentioned period reaching €10.8 billion implemented and ongoing/finance secured investments. In the 2001-2011 period, 66% of investments in completed projects and 67% in finance secured/ongoing projects were financed from budgets and IFI loans. However, bearing in mind current financial crisis and limited potential to increase taxes to service more debt, the same sources of funding for the Network development might not be available in the same volume in the forthcoming period. Accordingly, the importance of focusing on those key investment projects that can deliver the most value in terms of their potential to ensure socio-economic development and greater integration into the EU transport network is becoming even more important. The main regional infrastructure priorities, evaluated based on the `SEETO Priority Projects Rating Methodology`, are presented in the fourth chapter of the document. The MAP 2013 priority projects list reflects the highest priorities for the future investments in the SEETO Comprehensive Network and provides objective and consistent view on the quality of the projects nominated. High maturity of regional priorities is detected based on the fact that 72% of total required investments (€8.2 billion) are foreseen for implementation in priority projects eligible for funding.
Horizontal measures analysed in correlation with proposed SEETO strategic projects are addressed in the final chapter of the document together with proposals for overall improvement of the transport system in the South East Europe.
6
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
TABLE OF CONTENT1. Introduction
2. Assessment of the SEETO Comprehensive Network
2.1 SEETO Comprehensive Road Network .................................................................................................................................................................... 10
2.2 SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12
2.3 SEETO Comprehensive Network Airports .............................................................................................................................................................. 15
2.4 SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway Network ............................................................................................................................................. 17
2.5 SEETO Comprehensive Network Seaports ............................................................................................................................................................. 18
3. SEETO Comprehensive Network investments
3.1 Assessment of completed and finance secured/ongoing projects investments .................................................................................... 19
3.2 Assessment of completed and finance secured/ongoing priority projects .............................................................................................. 20
3.3. Investment needs on the SEETO Comprehensive Network ........................................................................................................................... 21
4. MAP 2013 Priority Projects
4.1 Priority projects for implementation ....................................................................................................................................................................... 23
4.2 Priority projects for preparation ................................................................................................................................................................................ 26
4.3 Presentation of road network projects by corridor/route ................................................................................................................................ 28
4.3.1 Road Corridor Vc ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
4.3.2 Road Corridor VIII .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30
4.3.3 Road Corridor X ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 31
4.3.4 Road Route 1 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33
4.3.5 Road Route 2a .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34
4.3.6 Road Route 2b .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35
4.3.7 Road Route 2c .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
4.3.8 Road Route 3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37
4.3.9 Road Route 4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38
4.3.10 Road Route 6a ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 39
4.3.11 Road Route 7 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40
4.4 Presentation of rail network projects by corridor/route ................................................................................................................................... 41
4.4.1 Rail Corridor Vb ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 41
4.4.2 Rail Corridor VIII ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
4.4.3 Rail Corridor X ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43
4.4.4 Rail Corridor Xb ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 45
4.4.5 Rail Corridor Xd ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 46
4.4.6 Rail Route 4 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 47
4.4.7 Rail Route 10 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 49
4.5 Airports ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50
4.6 Inland waterways and river ports ............................................................................................................................................................................. 52
4.7 Seaports ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53
5. Transport policy outlook
5.1 Overview of the progress in the SEETO transport horizontal measures with regional added value ............................................... 55
5.1.1 Railway reform ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55
5.1.2 Border-crossing facilitation ................................................................................................................................................................................. 55
7
5.1.3 Road safety auditing .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 56
5.2 Regional Transport Study ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 56
5.3 Regional transport policy monitoring mechanism ............................................................................................................................................ 56
5.3.1 Institutional and Regulatory framework monitoring ................................................................................................................................. 56
5.3.2 Model of trans-national policy cooperation along the main transport axes .................................................................................. 57
Annex 1 - SEETO Comprehensive Network description ................................................................................................................................................ 58
Annex 2 - Fiches for Priority projects for implementation ........................................................................................................................................... 62
Annex 3 - List of completed and finance secured/ongoing priority projects (on CD)
Annex 4 - SEETO Comprehensive Road Network (on CD)
Annex 5 - SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network (on CD)
Annex 6 - SEETO Comprehensive Network Airports (on CD)
Annex 7 - SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway Network (on CD)
Annex 8 - SEETO Comprehensive Network Seaports (on CD)
List of Tables
Table 2- 1: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network length by Regional Participant ............................................................................................. 11
Table 2- 2: Condition of the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network (2006, 2009 and 2011) ............................................................................ 12
Table 2- 3: SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network length by Regional Participants............................................................................................... 13
Table 2- 4: The SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network condition (2005-2011) ........................................................................................................ 14
Table 2- 5: SEETO Comprehensive Network airport concessions .............................................................................................................................. 16
Table 3- 1: Status of priority projects by MAP priority lists (2007-2011) .................................................................................................................. 20
Table 4- 1: Rating of priority projects for implementation ........................................................................................................................................... 24
Table 4- 2: Priority projects for preparation ....................................................................................................................................................................... 26
Table 4- 3: Priority projects on the Road Corridor Vc from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ...................................................................... 28
Table 4- 4: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Corridor Vc .................................................................................. 28
Table 4- 5: Priority projects on the Road Corridor VIII from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ..................................................................... 30
Table 4- 6: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Corridor VIII ................................................................................ 30
Table 4- 7: Priority projects on the Road Corridor X from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ........................................................................ 31
Table 4- 8: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Corridor X ................................................................................... 31
Table 4- 9: Priority projects on the Road Route 1 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ............................................................................. 33
Table 4- 10: Completed and ongoing projects on the Road Route 1 ....................................................................................................................... 33
Table 4- 11: Priority projects on the Road Route 2a from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ........................................................................ 34
Table 4- 12: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 2a .................................................................................... 34
Table 4- 13: Priority projects on the Road Route 2b from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ........................................................................ 35
Table 4- 14: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 2b ................................................................................... 35
Table 4- 15: Priority projects on the Road Route 2c from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ........................................................................ 36
Table 4- 16: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 2c .................................................................................... 36
Table 4- 17: Priority projects on the Road Route 3 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list........................................................................... 37
Table 4- 18: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 3 ...................................................................................... 37
Table 4- 19: Priority projects on the Road Route 4 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list........................................................................... 38
Table 4- 20: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 4 ...................................................................................... 38
Table 4- 21: Priority projects on the Road Route 6a from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ........................................................................ 39
Table 4- 22: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 6a .................................................................................... 39
Table 4- 23: Priority projects on the Road Route 7 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list........................................................................... 40
Table 4- 24: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 7 ...................................................................................... 40
Table 4- 25: Priority projects on the Corridor Vb from the MAP 2013 priority projects list .............................................................................. 41
Table 4- 26: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Corridor Vb .......................................................................................... 41
8
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Table 4- 27: Priority projects on the Corridor VIII from the MAP 2013 priority projects list .............................................................................. 42
Table 4- 28: Priority projects on the Corridor X from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ................................................................................. 43
Table 4- 29: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Corridor X ............................................................................................ 43
Table 4- 30: Priority projects on the Corridor Xb from the MAP 2013 priority projects list .............................................................................. 45
Table 4- 31: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Corridor Xb ......................................................................................... 45
Table 4- 32: Priority projects on the Corridor Xd from the MAP 2013 priority projects list .............................................................................. 46
Table 4- 33: Priority projects on the Route 4 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ...................................................................................... 47
Table 4- 34: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Rail Route 4 ......................................................................................... 47
Table 4- 35: Priority projects on the Route 10 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ................................................................................... 49
Table 4- 36: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Rail Route 10....................................................................................... 49
Table 4- 37: Priority projects on the airports from the MAP 2013 priority projects list ...................................................................................... 50
Table 4- 38: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on airports ......................................................................................................... 50
Table 4- 39: Priority projects on the inland waterways and river ports from the MAP 2013 priority projects list .................................... 52
Table 4- 40: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on inland waterways and river ports ....................................................... 52
Table 4- 41: Priority projects on the seaports from the MAP 2013 priority projects list .................................................................................... 53
Table 4- 42: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on seaports ....................................................................................................... 53
List of Figures
Figure 2- 1: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network ......................................................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 2-2: SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network ............................................................................................................................................................. 14
Figure 3- 1: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects investments per source of funding........................................................... 19
Figure 3- 2: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects investments per transport mode (2007-2011) ..................................... 20
Figure 3-3: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network - Investment requirements .................................................................................................... 21
Figure 3- 4: SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network - Investment requirements ...................................................................................................... 22
Figure 4-1: Road priority projects eligible for funding................................................................................................................................................... 23
Figure 4- 2: Rail projects eligible for funding .................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Figure 4- 3: Overview of all projects on the Road Corridor Vc .................................................................................................................................... 28
Figure 4- 4: Overview of all projects on the Road Corridor VIII ................................................................................................................................... 30
Figure 4- 5: Overview of all projects on the Road Corridor X ...................................................................................................................................... 31
Figure 4- 6: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 1 ........................................................................................................................................... 33
Figure 4- 7: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 2a ......................................................................................................................................... 34
Figure 4- 8: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 2b......................................................................................................................................... 35
Figure 4- 9: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 2c ......................................................................................................................................... 36
Figure 4- 10: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 3 ......................................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 4- 11: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 4 ......................................................................................................................................... 38
Figure 4- 12: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 6a ...................................................................................................................................... 39
Figure 4- 13 : Overview of all projects on the Road Route 7 ........................................................................................................................................ 40
Figure 4- 14: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor Vb .................................................................................................................................... 41
Figure 4- 15: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor VIII .................................................................................................................................... 42
Figure 4- 16: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor X ....................................................................................................................................... 43
Figure 4- 17: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor Xb .................................................................................................................................... 45
Figure 4- 18: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor Xd .................................................................................................................................... 46
Figure 4- 19: Overview of all projects on the Rail Route 4 ............................................................................................................................................ 47
Figure 4- 20: Overview of all projects on the Rail Route 10 ......................................................................................................................................... 49
Figure 4- 21: Overview of all projects on airports ............................................................................................................................................................ 50
Figure 4- 22: Overview of all projects on the inland waterways and river ports .................................................................................................. 52
Figure 4- 23: Overview of all projects on seaports .......................................................................................................................................................... 53
9
AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic
AMM Annual Meeting of Ministers
BCA Border Crossing Agreement
BCP Border Crossing Points
CEFTA Central European Free Trade Agreement
CAA Civil Aviation Authority
DAHAR Danube Inland Harbor Development
DG MOVE Directorate General for Mobility and Transport
EBRD European Bank of Reconstruction and Development
EC European Commission
ECAA European Common Aviation Area
EDI Electronic Data Interchange
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EIB European Investment Bank
ERTMS European Rail Traffic Management System
ETCS European Train Control System
EU European Union
FAB Functional Airspace Block
GIS Geographical Information System
GDP Gross Domestic Product
HCM Highway Capacity Manual
HGV Heavy Goods Vehicle
IDB Islamic Development Bank
IRI International Roughness Index
IFC International Finance Corporation
IFI International Financial Institution
ILS Instrument Landing System
IM Infrastructure Manager
IPA Instrument for Pre-accession assistance
IPF Infrastructure Project Facility
ITS Intelligent transportation system
IWW Inland waterway
KfW Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau
MAP Multi Annual Plan
MoU Memorandum of Understanding
NAPA North Adriatic Port Association
NEWADA Network of Danube Waterway Administrations)
NIPAC National IPA (Instrument for Pre-Accession) Coordinator
NC National Coordinator(s)
NRSS National Road Safety Strategy
NS Network Statement
OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
OSS One Stop Shop
PMoU The Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control
RB Regulatory Body
REBIS Regional Balkan Infrastructure Study
RIS River Information Services
RSA/RSI Road Safety Auditing/Road Safety Inspection
SC Steering Committee
SEE South East Europe
SEETO South East Europe Transport Observatory
SEETIS South East Europe Transport Information System
TEN-T Trans-European Transport Network
TAV Tepe Akfen Ventures
TAIEX Technical Assistance and Information Exchange
TIA Tirana International Airport
UIC International Union of Railways
UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
VTMIS Vessel Traffic Monitoring Information System
WANDA Waste management for inland Navigation on the Danube
WATERMODE Transnational Network for the Promotion of the Wa-ter-ground Multimodal Transport
WB World Bank
WBIF Western Balkan Investment Framework
WG Working Group
ZAIC Zagreb Airport International Company
ABBREVIATIONS
10
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
1. INTRODUCTION
Seven Regional Participants and the European Commission signed the Memorandum of Understanding1 (MoU) for the Development of the Core Regional Transport Network in 2004. The main objective of the MoU is to stimulate development of the regional high level transport network (SEETO Comprehensive Network) fostering the most efficient and environmentally friendly transport modes, and to promote and enhance common transport policies to facilitate infrastructure development. The South East Europe Transport Observatory (SEETO) has been established in 2005 to facilitate the implementation of the MoU. The Multi Annual Plan (MAP) which is the main regional transport planning document is used as one of the instruments by the SEETO in supporting the infrastructural development in the South East Europe.
Development of transport infrastructure in the Western Balkans is fundamental for regional development and furthermore, it encourages regional interconnection and integration into the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T). This is an explicit point of attention of the Regional Participants which would enable them to strengthen their economic and social cohesion as well as to reduce disparities in levels of transport infrastructure development in the Western Balkans region.
Therefore, the main purpose of the MAP is to give an overview of the SEETO Comprehensive Network as well as to provide guidelines for future transport development of the region. Correspondingly, the main goal of the MAP is to depict the SEETO Comprehensive Network together with key regional priority projects as well as to encourage further reforms in the transport sector. The purpose of such presentation is to promote and stimulate regional transport development in a most effective and efficient way.
A recent paper prepared for the stakeholders within the Western Balkan Investment Framework (WBIF)2 concluded that the growth prospects for the Western Balkans regions have significantly deteriorated over the last three years, while public debt which is comparably low in the Western Balkans in comparison to EU countries has increased rapidly in the last few years. Accordingly, the importance of strategic transport planning by identifying main regional priorities became even more important considering worsening economic situation in the Europe and Western Balkans region. Taking previously said into account, a `SEETO Priority Projects Rating Methodology` document was adopted in July 2012 in order to provide Regional Participants and potential external financiers with an objective and consistent view on the quality of the projects nominated as relevant for the implementation of the SEETO Comprehensive Network.
In order to provide necessary analyses and information on transport activities, the SEETO developed a data management system - South East Europe Information System (SEETIS) 3. The SEETIS 3 is an internet based GIS application which provides access and tools to geographical and textual information held by the SEETO. The application allows remote users to use the benefits of the SEETO Information System. It is embedded in the SEETO web site and acts as a portal for remote users and public to submit and obtain information about the SEETO Comprehensive Network, infrastructure condition, traffic performances and investment projects.
2. ASSESSMENT OF THE SEETO COMPREHENSIVE NETWORKImprovements of the SEETO Comprehensive Network in the year 2011 are presented in the following chapter. Each transport mode is elaborated separately throughout the following topics: a) regulatory changes; b) new infrastructure developments and traffic trends; for roads and railways c) maintenance; d) border crossing.
2.1 SEETO Comprehensive Road NetworkRegulatory changesCategorisation of roads in the Western Balkans region was the main topic regarding road infrastructure legislation development in last years as the application of a road hierarchy provides basis for competency in road planning and designing as well as responsibilities for road operation, funding, maintenance and liability. As a result, new laws on road categorisation together with accompanying decrees were adopted in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia and Kosovo*. In Albania, categorisation of roads was included in the newly adopted ’Strategy of the development of road transport‘ and in Montenegro study for the re-categorisation of local and regional roads has been finished and will serve as a basis for future legislative acts.
Improvement of road safety was another topic of great importance to the Regional Participants as the road safety indicators are still high in the Western Balkans region comparing to the best performing EU countries3. The first step towards the improvements marked the adoption of road safety laws, establishment of road safety management institutions and basis for road safety strategy and action plans development in majority of Regional Participants. The purpose of road safety management bodies is to analyse, monitor and improve the road traffic safety system through preventive and promotional activities and establish cooperation with international and national institutions.
1www.seetoint.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/11/16_memorandum-of-understanding-on-the-development-of-the-south-east-europe-core-regional-transport-network.pdf* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and ICJ Advisory opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence. 2Outlook for Macro-Economic Development in the Western Balkans and Implications for the WBIF, IFI Coordination Office, May 2012 3More information can be found in Chapter 5 and Annex 4 (available on CD)
11
Table 2- 1: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network length by Regional Participant
Regional Participant Total km
Albania 729
Bosnia and Herzegovina 870
Croatia 1,606
the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
708
Montenegro 640
Serbia 1,622
Kosovo 354
Total 6,529Source: SEETIS III
Figure 2- 1: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network
Infrastructure and traffic development of the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network
When comparing to 2010, difference in the SEETO Comprehensive road network length in 2011 could be noticed (6,554 km in 2010) due to the minor alignment modification (Route 7 in Albania, Corridor VIII in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Route 1 in Montenegro).
Development of the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network infrastructure in 2011 was marked by the large construction works on Corridor X, Corridor VIII and Route 7 and additional smaller scale works on other corridors and routes (all projects are presented by corridor/route in Chapter 4 and Annex 2).
Positive output of high investments in the road network is perceivable in 36% increase of roads in motorway or dual carriageway standards from 2006 to 2011. In 2011, 244 km of motorways were opened for traffic upon the completion of road network projects, what makes 4% of the total SEETO Comprehensive Road Network.
Level of Service (LoS) D to F was recorded on 703km (11% of the network) which indicates 26% decrease of congested sections on the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network comparing to the previous year (2010) primarily as a result of newly constructed motorway sections.
12
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
The Highway Capacity Manual describes the LOS levels as follows:Level of Service A: Free flow,Level of Service B: Stable flow,Level of Service C: Stable flow,Level of Service D: Unstable flow,Level of Service E: Operating conditions are at or near thecapacity level,Level of Service F: Forced or breakdown flow, formation ofqueues.
Foreseen finalisation of Belgrade By-pass construction (Serbia) in 2012/2013 marks one step forward in bottleneck mitigation on the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network. The project is expected to facilitate the most congested part of the Network (LoS F), with the highest traffic recorded in 2011 (127,842 AADT) as well as to remove all transit traffic from the city centre.
Table 2- 2: Condition of the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network (2006, 2009 and 2011)
SEETO Class. 2006 (%) 2009 (%) 2011 (%)
Very Good 26 21 20
Good 20 37 40
Medium 39 35 33
Poor 6 3 5
Very Poor 9 4 2Source: SEETIS III
Road maintenance
In order to modernise road maintenance practices, the project Road infrastructure and safety financed by the World Bank (`WB`) is ongoing in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska)4, while in Albania introduction of performance-based contract and improvement of road safety is foreseen to be developed as a part of planned WB financed project. Total Regional Participants expenditures in SEETO Comprehensive Road Network maintenance amounted €131.855 million in 2011. However, the amount invested in the SEETO Comprehensive road network maintenance among Regional Participants differs significantly from €1.7 million in Albania to €65.3 million in Croatia
Border-crossings on the SEETO Road Comprehensive Network
Unlike the standard performance indicators for network conditions, traffic flows etc. on the basis of which the SEETO Comprehensive Network is being assessed annually, there is a lack of data (and unified methodology) for determining the waiting times on border-crossing points along the SEETO Comprehensive Network, which surely represent one of the most important indicators for the performance of the entire SEETO Comprehensive Road Network. The SEETO is striving year by year to invigorate the data collection related to border-crossings, in order to be able to better identify the bottlenecks on the entire Network and to monitor the improvements.
In addition to 14 external BCPs with EU member States, there are 38 in ternal BCPs along the SEETO Road Comprehensive Network.
From the data available6, the biggest delays on road border crossings in 2011 occurred at the BCPs Kapshtice and Kakvije between Albania and Greece on the Corridor VIII and Route 2c, accordingly, where the average entry delay for trucks was 80 minutes, followed by the BCP Morine (Route 7) and BCP Gradina (Route 5) with average of 60 minutes recorded waiting time delays.
Compared to the previous year, no changes can be reported in the waiting time for all previously mentioned BCPs, while for a relatively unchanged traffic flow for heavy good vehicles, the situation has aggravated at the BCP Batrovci (Corridor X) and Horgos (Corridor Xb), which recorded delays of respectively 27 and 39 minutes in 2010, but 55 and 57 minutes in 2011, accordingly.
Despite the general trend of shortening the waiting times at borders in the South East Europe compared to the last decade, further reducing of excessive delays and cutting the cumbersome procedures, in particular for freight transport, is still an issue that urges for attention, as it can be concluded from the data presented. More details about the further plans of SEETO in this area can be found in Chapter 5 and the SEETO Report on Border-crossing facilitation7.
2.2 SEETO Comprehensive Rail NetworkRegulatory changes
Following the EU initiative to create integrated railway area and concomitant reforming process, South East Europe Regional Participants embarked on this tendency in order to make railways more competitive, primarily by improving railway transport services8.
In regard to the Addendum and aiming to determine exact status of the implemented reforms as well as to enable opening of the rail market in SEE, the SEETO prepared South East Europe Rail Reform Progress Report9 which provides an overview of the current state of play and guidelines for future actions.
Regional Participants were active in preparation of the new railway laws which would enable open market and increase competitiveness of railways. To this end, Albania, Montenegro and Serbia prepared new draft laws on railways which are expected to be adopted by the end of 2012. Kosovo adopted the new law on railways in 2011 that further regulates restructuring of the railway sector, focusing on rail interoperability and safety system improvement as well as non-discriminatory access to operators. In parallel, Montenegro and Serbia prepared new laws on railway safety to ensure development and improvement of safety and interoperability, encircling rail transport policy.
Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro have previously separated their integrated railway companies while in 2011 the process continued in
4Source - Western Balkans Investment Framework 5Data missing from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro6Data is missing from Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia7The Report is available on www.seetoint.org8Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding on the Development of the South East Europe Core Regional Transport Network for a South East European Railway Transport Area9The Report is available on www.seetoint.org
13
Kosovo by separation of integrated rail company into two companies (infrastructure manager - INFRAKOS and train operations - TRAINKOS) and in Serbia with transformation of integrated company ’Serbian Railways‘ into a joint stock company, comprised of one coordinating company and four daughter companies (passenger, freight, infrastructure manager and asset management).
Regarding the institutional setup of the rail authorities necessary for regulating an open rail market, most of the Regional Participants have established regulatory bodies (except Albania). Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia and Kosovo incorporated safety, licensing and regulatory function into one authority while Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia have established completely separate bodies.
Croatia’s new Safety Authority which will implement procedures related to safety certificates of railway undertakings began with operations in May 2011. This Authority is responsible for the approval of safety management systems, vehicle authorisation, train driver licenses and registers, the inventory of national safety rules and their reporting to the NOTIFID databank of the European Railway Agency10.
Further on, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia focused on the establishment of the Committee for rail accident and incident investigation (Accident Investigation Body). In order to further fortify the role of the Montenegrin Railway Directorate, Technical Assistance for the elaboration of five year strategic programme has been secured through IPA.
Even though the progress in the implementation of the Addendum is evident, especially in the legislative field and the institutional setup, complete operational establishment is still lagging behind.
Infrastructure and traffic development of the SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network
The SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network length differs in comparison to the MAP 2012 (4,807km) due to the update of the data on the alignment.
Table 2- 3: SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network length by Regional ParticipantsRegional Participant Total kmAlbania 392Bosnia and Herzegovina 652Croatia 1,422the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 531Montenegro 184Serbia 1,445Kosovo 151Total 4,777
Source: SEETIS 2 (2011)
The SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network improvement in 2011 was characterised by rehabilitation and overhaul works on the Corridor X and Vc and several smaller scale works on other sections. Reconstruction of section Vinkovci-Tovarnik (33.9 km) in Croatia, financed from ISPA, presents one of the flagship projects of enhancing infrastructure parameters along the Corridor X. Alongside condition improvement, projected speed has been upgraded to 160km/h and ERTMS equipment have been initially introduced on Croatian railways.
On the Serbian side, reconstruction and modernisation of section Batajnica-Golubinci (24 km) was completed as the first part of a larger EIB programme `Reconstruction and upgrading of Corridor X in Serbia`. Final output of the project was to increase speed parameters up to 160 km/h and construction of the double track, setting the double track traffic on the entire railway line between Belgrade and Sid (Croatian border).
The completed projects have contributed to the infrastructure condition improvement, where 19% increase of sections in Very Good to Medium condition11 in comparison to 2005 level was recorded.
On the Corridor Vc in Bosnia and Herzegovina, overhaul and signalisation instalment on section Konjic-Capljina was completed, improving safety and environmental standards. Introduced upgrade will enable more efficient transport of the freight (94.2 % of total traffic in 200912) from Port of Ploce, the largest entry point of goods for Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Development of interoperable, environmentally friendly rail network is a focal point of the EU infrastructure policy. To this purpose, harmonisation of electrification system (to 25 kV/50Hz) on Corridor Vb (Croatia) is currently being conducted. Upon completion of the project, the whole SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network will have one electrification standard (25 kV/50Hz).
Considering that the SEETO Comprehensive rail network is electrified in its largest part (52%), future integration of railways into transport system and improving competitiveness of railways is a priority. It will positively influence on reduction of road congestions actualising more balanced modal share.
The SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network freight and passenger traffic volume followed the same pattern, experiencing steady decline (passenger 19%, freight 2%) in 2011 from 201013. The Corridor X, with 42% of freight and 67% of passenger traffic volume in 2011, was the main artery for transportation and mobility in the region.
Bottlenecks on the SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network were recorded mostly on the Corridor X in the wider area of capitals (Croatia and Serbia), on 60 km of double track sections and 195 km single track sections. Currently under preparation is the project documentation for upgrading Croatian Corridor`s X section Dugo Selo-Novska from one to two tracks (financed by IPA). Project addresses one of the bottlenecks and will facilitate traffic on one of the most frequent parts of the SEETO Comprehensive Network.
10South East Europe Rail Reform Progress Report, SEETO, 201211Missing links have not been taken into calculation12Railway Reform in South East Europe and Turkey, World Bank , 201113Additional information can be found in Annex 5 (available on CD)
14
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
After a long period of under investing in the rail infrastructure, current ongoing and planned projects indicate that the revitalisation of the main rail lines has commenced. However, stronger commitment of the Regional Participants is necessary in order to increase attractiveness of railway transport and to achieve more balanced modal share.
Table 2- 4: The SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network condition (2005-2011)
SEETO Class. 2005 (%) 2011 (%)
Very Good 0 1
Good 9 20
Medium 53 61
Poor 30 11
Very Poor 1 3
No information 7 4
Total 100 100
Source: SEETIS 2 (2011)
Rail Maintenance
Total maintenance expenditures in the SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network were approximately €97 million (2011)14. The largest part (54%) was placed in infrastructural maintenance and other part was divided on maintenance of signalling and telecommunication systems and electrification systems.
Segmentation of the SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network maintenance expenditures by Regional Participants indicates large differences, where Croatia (67.7 M€) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.3 M€) allocate the most in maintenance expenditure.
Border-crossings on the SEETO Rail Comprehensive Network
As already mentioned in the road border crossing section, main issue of calculating waiting times at the border-crossing points along the SEETO Comprehensive Network is a lack of data and unified methodology. Nevertheless the SEETO strives to stimulate data collection related to border-crossings and to provide sustainable data regarding the current status.According to the received data15, the biggest delay on rail border crossing points in 2011 was on BCP Dimitrovgrad
Figure 2-2: SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network
14Data missing for Montenegro 15Data is missing from Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro
15
(Corridor Xc), where the average entry delay for freight trains was 300 minutes. It is followed by the BCP Vrsac (Route 4) with average entry delay of 120 minutes for freight trains and BCP Hani i Hotit (Route 2).
The greatest changes were recorded on the BCPs with the largest delays in 2010 (BCP Dimitrovgrad) where the delay for freight trains was reduced from 603 to 300 minutes (50%) in 2011. However, the situation aggravated at the BCP Vrsac, from 103 to 120 minutes.
Several Regional Participants signed border crossing agreements (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Kosovo; Montenegro – Serbia; Serbia – Bulgaria) on the establishing one joint border station, while current negotiations are ongoing between Montenegro and Albania. Implementation of the agreements would significantly reduce the border waiting times, but the implementation has not yet started and is expected in the forthcoming years.
Excessive waiting times and cumbersome procedures present one of the largest impediments to transport in the region. Due to the large number of BCPs in relatively small area, railways in the Western Balkan are losing market to other rail lines (EU) and to other modes as well. Hence, regional cooperation and reduction of waiting times are of the largest significance for establishing free undisturbed transport flow and for the future prosperity of railways.
2.3 SEETO Comprehensive Network Airports
Regulatory changes
Establishment of air transport organisational and institutional regulations in the Western Balkans is carried out by the implementation of European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) agreement. Even though deadline for ECAA Agreements First Phase implementation was the year 2010, only Croatia fully completed the process in 2011, while the other Regional Participants are still in the implementation phase with significant progresses recorded in the last year16.
In the recent years, all Regional Participants established Civil Aviation Authority together with other centres responsible for air transport safety, while in Serbia in 2011, the Centre for Investigation of Accidents and Serious Incidents as a separate and independent institution was established. Inspection oversight functions and activities from the Ministry of Infrastructure to the Civil Aviation Directorate were transferred. On the other hand, full functionality of Albanian Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has been approved in 2011 by evocating Albanian Airlines license together with one Belle Air`s aircraft in order to prevent its appearance on EU banned carriers list. Aiming towards mentioned situation resolvement, Albanian CAA contracted an external expert to assist in the issue on the establishment of adequate safety oversight and improve the performance of air transport in Albania.
As for airport privatisations in the Western Balkans, Croatia has adopted amendments to the Air Law related to concessions (2011) in order to establish a legal basis for Zagreb Airport concession contract signing (2012). A 30 years concession contract was signed with ZAIC17 consortium which foresees €236 million investments for the design and construction of the new terminal and €88 million for operation of all airport infrastructures for the entire period of the concession.
Prevailing problem regarding the air transport in the Western Balkans is the development of the route network as well as lack of intraregional connectivity. Different approaches in resolving are used, such as adoption of Decree on granting financial support to domestic and foreign airlines in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in 2012 where procedure for granting financial support to the domestic and foreign airlines is finished, and Agreement for Financial support was signed between the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (trough the Ministry of Transport and communications) and Wizz Air Hungary.
In 2012, the agreement on bilateral cooperation in the field of air traffic management between Serbia and Montenegro has been signed. The cooperation agreement presents postulate for further cooperation between the Regional Participants Aviation Authorities that should strengthen their position towards the Single European Sky agreement on the Functional Airspace Blocks (FAB) implementation. The second agreement relates to the signing of Memorandum of Understanding between United Arab Emirates (UEA) and Albania which enables a number of designated airlines the right to fly between signatories.
It can be concluded that the air transport in the Western Balkans is evolving from year to year by application of EU legislation. However, the problem of intraregional connectivity prevails, where majority of destinations from and to the SEETO Comprehensive Network airports are in the Western Europe and only 10% of all air transport operations in the region are made within the SEETO Comprehensive network. Underdeveloped connections between the SEE capitals and major cities represent a barrier for fast and convenient travel within the region. New air links within the SEE region could considerably improve mobility and accelerate economic integration and cooperation processes. In that respect, this new mobility potential should be further considered and analysed to determine whether a new optimised air transport network could be established.
Infrastructure and traffic development of the SEETO Comprehensive Network Airports
Infrastructure projects on the expansion and reconstruction of airport terminal buildings marked previous year’s development of the SEETO Comprehensive Network Airports even though their maximum capacities still meet current demand.
16European Commission – Enlargement – Enlargement strategy and Progress reports 201117ZAIC – Zagreb Airport International Company - France’s Aéroports de Paris Management (a subsidiary of Aéroports de Paris), Bouygues Bâtiment International (a subsidiary of Bouygues Construction) and Viadukt (a Croatian construction company)
16
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Airport Belgrade and Zagreb that recorded the highest passenger and cargo traffic in 2011 operate with the capacity utilisation at respectively 62% and 84%. Nevertheless, reconstruction of the airport of Belgrade that recorded the highest passenger traffic in 2011 (3.1 million passengers) began at the end of 2011, while the airport of Zagreb was given under concession (2012) for the construction and operation as mentioned in the previous subchapter18.
In the year 2011 the total number of passengers carried in the SEETO Comprehensive Network airports increased by 17% comparing to 2010, reaching to 14.8 million passengers.
Beside Zagreb airport construction, Croatian airports Split and Dubrovnik have prepared projects for the reconstruction and development in the forthcoming period, as well. Difficulties in securing finances for Dubrovnik and Split airports reconstruction are evident due to the high seasonal variations (peaks) in a number of flights and passengers that undermine possibilities for further infrastructure investments.
Private sector investments under the concession agreements in airport sector are highly represented as an alternative possibility for securing necessary funding in the process of the SEETO Comprehensive Network airports development.
Successful implementation of project through a public private partnership portfolio may be seen in the airport Tirana example, where EBRD granted a loan (2008) to a concessionaire Tirana International Airport (TIA) for the second phase construction. Indisputable positive outputs of first applied concession agreement on the SEETO Comprehensive Network airports are reflected in doubling of passenger traffic on Tirana Airport in 2011 from 2006.
Additional reason for Tirana`s airport significant increase can be found in visa liberalisation with the EU countries, entered into force on December 2010 and completion of Air Traffic Control modernisation project.
In the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia successful completion of Airport of Skopje and Ohrid construction and reconstruction were completed in 2011 as a part of concession agreement signed in 2008 with Turkish company Tepe Akfen Ventures (TAV). Airport Skopje currently operates on a largest apron terminal area (40,000 m2) area in the region and has highest maximum capacity of 4.2 million passengers in the region. Positive outputs of the project implementation are perceivable in 13.3% passenger air traffic volume increase in 2011 from 2010.
Construction and rehabilitation of airports Skopje and Ohrid that were given under concession to Turkish company Tepe Akfen Ventures (TAV) in 2008 were completed in 2011.
On the other hand, private sector investments seem unlikely to be made in the airports such as airport Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Rijeka, Osijek (Croatia) and Nis (Serbia) that have very low traffic volumes (less than 100 000 passengers). Additional focus should be placed towards its development in a view of applying different mechanisms for the attraction of airlines or reorienting airport development strategies towards general aviation.
From foregoing information it can be concluded that even though capacity of the SEETO Comprehensive Network airports meet current demand, plans for their further infrastructure and operational development are in place. Upon the finalisation of previously stated projects and further opening of the air transport market in the SEE, the SEETO Comprehensive Network airports might find their possibility to increase their operation volumes and at the same time facilitate existing congestion problems on major European airports.
Table 2- 5: SEETO Comprehensive Network airport concessions
Airport Concessionaire Agreement signed (year)
Concession duration
Investments as foreseen in the concession agreement
Tirana TIA - Hochtief Airport GmbH, Deutsche Investitions und Entwicklungsgesells-chaft (DEG) and the Albanian-American Enterprise Fund (AAEF).
2004 20 years €21 million concession fees to the Government; €82 million in construction - COMPLETED
Ohrid TAV - Tepe Akfen Ventures 2008 20 years €100 million in construction - All construction works for airport Skopje and Ohrid are COMPLETED
Skopje
Zagreb ZAIC - France’s Aéroports de Paris Man-agement, Bouygues Bâtiment Interna-tional and Viadukt
2012 30 years €236 million design and construction of the new terminal €88 million for operation – AGREEMENT SIGNED
Pristina Turkish-French Consortium ‘Limak & Airports de Lyon”
2010 20 years €100 million in construction - ONGOING
Source: SEETO
18Additional information can be found in Annex 6 (available on CD)
17
2.4 SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway Network
Regulatory changes
Considering the inland waterway sector, the Regional Participants are further developing and aligning their legislation with the EU acquis. In Croatia the bylaws for the River Information Services have been changed and updated while in Serbia, the application of RIS, based on the Law on Navigation and Ports on Inland Waterways, which will improve navigation and transport on the SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway Network, will be mandatory from 2013.
Furthermore, Serbia has established Agency for Management of the Ports, in order to secure better management and plan future development of the state-owned river ports. After the official endorsement of the European Union Strategy for Danube Region by the European Council on 24 June 2011, implementation of the Strategy has started. Regional Participants, albeit not the EU members, are actively taking part in the implementation and contributing to the harmonised development of the Danube region connectivity. As a first step, priority projects for 1st priority area (Mobility) were proposed in 2012.
Alongside infrastructure development and transposition of the EU legislation, several transnational projects have been conducted with the aim of cross border cooperation enhancement. NEWADA19 (Network of Danube Waterway Administrations) aspired at increasing the efficiency of the Danube by intensifying the cooperation between Waterway Administrations. Project WANDA20 related to protection of the Danube and its ecosystem from pollution, aimed to establish cross-border coordinated ship waste management system along the Danube. Furthermore, WATERMODE21 project (Transnational Network for the promotion of the Water-Ground Multimodal Transport) intended to promote the coordination between the actors dealing with logistics for a better management of the multi-modal logistics cooperation, especially exploiting the ground/water connections.
Infrastructure and traffic development of the SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway Network
On the SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway Network, activities were focused on the instalment of the River Information Services on the river Danube in Croatia and Serbia, where 15 Automatic Identification Base Stations were put into operation. Implementation of RIS on Danube in Serbia was extended on the River Sava, where three Automatic Identification Base stations are planned to be installed. Development of control centre for River Information Services (RIS) in Sisak (Croatia) is ongoing, while full introduction of RIS on River Sava is planned by the beginning of 2015.
Introduction of RIS on the SEETO Comprehensive Network inland waterways is expected to significantly improve navigability and contribute to increase in currently marginal transport flows on the River Danube and the River Sava.
Due to the heavy winter, navigation on the Danube was completely stopped in one period, resulting in decrease (by 14%) of freight traffic flows in Serbia. Several measures are being conducted with the objective of increasing reliability of IWW transport. Removal of UXO is ongoing on the Danube in Serbia in order to protect the environment and ensure safe navigation conditions in those parts of Corridor VII. The action is a part of an EU-funded project.
Additionally, from IPA 2010, funding was secured for preparation of tender and project documentation for regulation and dredging works on the Danube in Serbia, with the main goal of critical section removal and enhancing navigability and ensuring stable transport flows.
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia have concluded agreements on the improvement of Sava River waterway navigation and technical maintenance. The project of restoration and development of the waterway and navigation on the Sava River waterway entered the final phase of planning, which will result in final design of the waterway and other technical documentation necessary for the execution of works22.
River ports of the SEETO Comprehensive Network have substantial capacity but the equipment and infrastructure in most of the ports require reinvestment, which affects the utilisation of inland waterway ports as multimodal connecting points and logistical centres.
In 2011, the Port of Novi Sad had the highest freight traffic23 on the SEETO Comprehensive Network (608 Kt of loaded and unloaded units) with the decline of 4% in comparison to 2010. The port of Novi Sad is included in the DAHAR24 project, which aims on integration of waterway cargo transport into the logistic network and development of logistical and multi-modal capacities of their ports and port areas.
The SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway Network is predominantly used for the freight transport, while passenger transport is largely limited to tourist and leisure activities along the River Danube. The largest passenger frequency was recorded in the Port of Belgrade, as the one of the largest touristic city centres along the Danube accounting 445 passenger vessels and 57,817 passengers.
The port of Brcko25 (River Sava) experienced the sharpest freight traffic decline (77%) in 2011. Due to the low water levels navigation was entirely halted from July to December. Low water levels influence reliability on the River Sava and on some parts of the Danube present a large obstacle to stable transport flows. Hence, rapid rehabilitation of the Sava and Danube waterway and ensuring sustainable transport flows are of utmost importance, in order to establish effective inland waterway network.
19www.newada.eu/20www.wandaproject.eu/21www.watermode.eu/22Official bulletin of the ISRBC, International Sava River Basin Commission, 2012
23Additional information can be found in Annex 7 (available on CD)24www.dahar.eu/25Data missing for Croatian ports: Slavonski Brod, Osijek, Vukovar
18
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
2.5 SEETO Comprehensive Network SeaportsRegulatory changes
Significant progress in terms of maritime sector development is evident in all three Regional Participants (Albania, Croatia and Montenegro) where the SEETO Comprehensive network seaports are situated. Albania’s Parliamentary Committee approved amendments to Maritime Code that will bring Albanian maritime legislation closer to the EU standards and reflect changes that have occurred over the years in the respective sector. Speaking in operational terms, the code expanded the right to provide cabotage services to the EU flag-carriers and abolished the requirement that ships’ captains must be Albanian nationals.
As Croatia has fully implemented the majority of EU legislation regarding maritime transport, it made another step forward marked completion of Vessel Traffic Monitoring Information System (VTMIS) physical implementation. Similar actions were taken in Montenegro through ongoing EU funded project `Establishment of VTMIS and improvement of authority’s response to marine pollution incident`.
The Rijeka Gateway Project began in 2003 aiming to increase market competitiveness and efficiency of the Port of Rijeka and its traffic route. The project comprises additional component of private capital introduction into port operations done in coordination with the World Bank. Accordingly, renewal of contract on Brajdica Container and Ro-Ro Terminal concession, which has been signed with the Container Terminal of the Port of Rijeka (Adriatic Gate j.s.c.) for the period of 30 years in 2009, came into force in November 2011.
Based on significant progress in the EU laws implementation, the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (PMoU) Committee agreed that Montenegro can be granted cooperating member status in the framework of the PMoU. Montenegrin Government placed their attention towards improvements in the fields of pollution from vessels and handling of waste, with the adoption of a new Law on protection of the sea from pollution by vessels in 2011.
Infrastructure and traffic development of the SEETO Comprehensive Network Seaports
On majority seaports certain infrastructure works took place during the last year out of which the most significant ones regarding cargo transport occurred on the ports of Durres, Rijeka and Ploce. It is interesting to observe that on almost all SEETO Comprehensive Network seaports decrease in freight traffic volumes (total drop of 11%) and increase in passenger traffic volumes (total increase of 7%) are recorded26.
The port terminal building in Durres was upgraded during the last year (rehabilitation of port building, construction of ferry terminal) and in the forthcoming period extending of the wharfs is planned. It will bring additional possibilities for future development in traffic volumes of the second largest SEETO Comprehensive Network seaport.
Among SEETO Comprehensive Network ports, the port of Rijeka is the largest (9.39 million tonnes) and accordingly due to its great importance for the Western Balkans, European and world maritime traffic its development is the Croatians Government priority. Its importance is also confirmed by inclusion in the North Adriatic Port Association (NAPA). The Adriatic Gate (port of Rijeka) has developed partnerships with all leading global ship owners so that the Port is now connected by regular direct ship lines with the biggest ports in Asia and by daily ship feeder lines it is included in the Mediterranean container system. Port infrastructure is currently being improved and expanded, notwithstanding that ports freight capacity utilisation is at 28%. In spite mentioned improvements in international trade relations and the certain progress done in the ports infrastructure development, a constant yearly decrease around 9% in cargo traffic volumes since the year 2007 is evident due to the global economic crisis.
The same pattern can be observed on the port of Ploce that recorded highest freight traffic drop (44%) from 2010, in spite of the highest investments in seaport sector implemented in its development (€269 million). Reason for such a high drop can be found in reduction of bulk cargo traffic due to difficulties in the operations of major customers in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Italy.
Certain encouragement of the Western Balkans market development potentiated from the Regional Participants or private sector, such as opening a new manufactures and intensification of production in the Regional Participants could significantly increase the SEETO Comprehensive Network seaports turnover.
Guided by the mentioned fact, the Port of Bar, which is planned to be given under the concession, established cooperation with railways of Montenegro and Fiat for the transfer of automobiles which will certainly improve ports traffic performance in the forthcoming period. In order to establish solid ground for mentioned operations, port invested €5.5 million in capacity expansion of transhipment equipment while expected procurement and instalment of all equipment will be completed by the end of 2012.
26Additional information can be found in Annex 8 (available on CD)
19
3. SEETO COMPREHENSIVE NETWORK INVESTMENTS Since the establishment of the SEETO Comprehensive Network significant investments were directed into its development, thereby setting the foundations for regional integration and economic development. Total investments in completed and finance secured/ongoing27 priority and non-priority projects28 on the SEETO Comprehensive Network amounted €10.8 billion in 2007-2011 period.
3.1 Assessment of completed and finance secured/ongoing projects investmentsInvestments in completed projects amount €6.7 billion (63% of total investments) while investments in finance secured/ongoing projects are significantly lower (€3.9 billion) as the financing agreements for its implementation were concluded in a more recent period (2007-2011) when the influence of economic crisis was largely present.
The reduction of the total investments in finance secured/ongoing projects has led to decrease of investments from each source of funding, out of which the highest decrease was recorded in budget investments. On the other hand, the share of IFI loans has grown significantly reaching almost 50% of all investments in finance secured/ongoing projects. Despite increase in its share, it should be also noted that the IFI loans in the Western Balkans are still highly underused as large amount of funding is secured but still not implemented in the projects29.
Large funds were recorded from `Other sources` which are consisted of banks (KfW30 and IDB31), OPEC fund and other bilateral loans. The most important reason for such a high share of `Other sources`, especially in completed projects, could be found in their large presence on the Western Balkans market in 2002-2007 period and their favourable lending conditions in that period of time.
In the observed period, the general trend of very low EU grants utilisation is noticeable in all Regional Participants in accordance to their accessible funds. However, the share of EU funds in finance secured/ongoing projects is significantly higher (7%) than in completed investments (2%) which show positive upwards trend. Lack of absorption capacities is identified stumbling block within the process that precludes full exploitations of the available funds.
Regional Participants should forehand start with the building of adequate absorption capacities in order to achieve greater utilisation of available EU funds in a timely manner, especially taking into account opening additional EU funds to some Regional Participants in the future.
Trend of high investments in the road infrastructure in the Western Balkans (82% of total investments) continued in the 2007-2011 period with noticeable outputs in the road network improvements apparent in 50% decrease of sections in `poor` and `very poor` condition from 2006 to 2010.
Very low investments in environmentally friendly transport modes, namely railways and inland waterways, are persistent in both completed and finance secured/ongoing projects. Accordingly, it is apparent that infrastructure development in the region should be more driven by the national and EU transport development strategies in which environmentally friendly transport modes play a leading role.
27Completed project – implementation of the project completed; Ongoing project – finances secured for project implementation, regardless of whether the implementation of the project has began. Investments in both type of projects refers to rehabilitation, upgrade and construction of transport infrastructure while maintenance is not included.28Priority projects – projects on the SEETO Comprehensive Network that were listed on the SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan (MAP) priority project list Non-priority projects – projects on the SEETO Comprehensive Network that were never listed on MAP priority project list292 billion of total allocated funds (all sectors) in Serbia are still not implemented, source European Investment Bank (EIB)30KfW - Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau31IDB – Islamic Development Bank
Figure 3- 1: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects investments per source of funding (2007-2011)
Completed project investments per source of funding
2% 23%7%
43%
25%
IFI loans Budget Other Concessions EU Funds
8%7%
Finance secured/Ongoing project investments per source of funding
18%
19%
48%
IFI loans Budget Other Concessions EU Funds
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
20
3.2 Assessment of completed and finance secured/ongoing priority projects
Implementation of priority projects on the SEETO Comprehensive Network is of utmost importance for efficient and effective transport system establishment, stimulating regional development in all aspects. Since the establishment of the SEETO Comprehensive Network, 82 projects in total were presented on MAP priority project lists, while the majority were present on more than one list. Since 2007, 29 priority projects have secured finances for its implementation in amount of €4.6 billion which
makes 44% of total completed and allocated funds (€10.8 billion) on the SEETO Comprehensive Network (detailed list of priority projects presented in Annex 3 on CD). Out of other 53 projects, 7 were dropped out of list (postponed) while 46 projects still require financing for its implementation (as presented in table 3-1).
Total of €1.5 billion was invested in 11 priority projects that were completed, while 18 priority projects have secured the financing (€3.1 billion) but due to their larger scale are still in the process of implementation. The implementation of mentioned priority projects will bring the SEETO Comprehensive Network on a higher operational level as well as improve economic efficiency of the South East European and European transport system34.
Figure 3- 2: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects investments per transport mode (2007-2011)
Table 3- 1: Status of priority projects per MAP priority lists (2007-2011)MAP Priority List
Completed Projects
Finance secured/ ongoing Projects
Postponed Projects32
Planed Projects33
All Priority Projects
Investments Projects Investments Projects Investments Projects Investments Projects Investments ProjectsM € % No % M € % No % M € % No % M € % No % M € % No %
MAP 2007-2011
463 28 5 15 438 27 3 9 23 1 1 3 708 43 24 73 1,632 100 33 100
MAP 2008-2012
995 33 2 6 0 - 0 0 84 3 1 3 1,898 64 33 92 2,977 100 36 100
MAP 2009-2013
20 0 1 2 1,476 31 5 12 650 14 2 5 2,599 55 34 81 4,745 100 42 100
MAP 2010-2014
31 1 2 5 773 22 5 14 207 6 2 5 2,515 71 28 76 3,526 100 37 100
MAP 2011-2015
27 1 1 3 400 11 4 13 4 0 1 3 3,176 88 26 81 3,607 100 32 100
MAP 2012-2016
0 - 0 0 9 0 1 2 0 - 0 0 8,394 100 46 98 8,403 100 47 100
Source: SEETIS III
32Postponed project - priority project that were dropped out of MAP priority project list33Planned project - priority project that was presented on the list as requires financing for the implementation 34More information can be found in the SEETO Comprehensive Network Investment report available on the SEETO web page-www.seetoint.org
4% 0% 3%
Completed project investments per transport mode
Road Rail IWWAirport Seaport
11%
82%
5%
4%0%
Finance secured/Ongoing projects investmentsper transport mode
Road Rail IWWAirport Seaport
9%
82%
2135SEETO project data base (SEETIS III) and IFI projects information36Investment need estimation was prepared with the technical assistance from the IFI Coordination Office, funded by the EC
3.3. Investment needs on the SEETO Comprehensive NetworkHigh priority investment areas of the SEETO Comprehensive Network will be elaborated in this subchapter based on an analysis of the current transport systems weaknesses. The analysis of investment needs has been done on the basis of road and rail network condition and level of service (bottlenecks) on the SEETO Comprehensive Road and Rail Network.
Calculation of the investment requirements was done separately for road and rail sections. Two main factors: a) network condition (very poor and poor sections) and b) bottleneck sections (LoS D, E, F for road and UIC capacity bottlenecks for rail) were considered as a basis for calculation.
After identification of the investment requirement sections35 rough figures for the rehabilitation, upgrade and new construction were determined based on which immediate investment needs were estimated36. Missing sections of the SEETO Comprehensive Network were not taken into consideration.
Very poor and poor road network sections exist on 499 km of network (8% of the network) where rehabilitation is urgently needed with total investment requirements amounting approximately €400 million. On the other hand, capacity limitations causing bottlenecks are evident on 703 km (11% of the network) where upgrade of the road network is needed in the amount of approximately €1.406 billion. Even though investment requirements for rehabilitation of road network are significantly lower, both types of network improvement are highly needed.
Analysis of the most deteriorated road sections showed that 18% (1,202 km) of the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network requires immediate rehabilitation or upgrade. Total investment requirements for rehabilitation and upgrade of the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network are estimated at more than €1.804 billion.
On two sections, Route 4 (Pozega-Uzice) and Corridor VIII (Fier-Vlore), both limitation factors (bottleneck and poor/very poor condition) are apparent. Hence, according to the used analysis and described parameters (bottleneck and condition) these sections require urgent intervention.
Figure 3-3: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network - Investment requirements
22
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Figure 3- 4: SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network - Investment requirements
From 1,202 km investment requirement sections, 240km (4% of the SEETO comprehensive road network) is foreseen to be upgraded through implementation of MAP 2013 priority projects, which implementation would lead to 20% decrease of bottlenecks and less developed sections on the SEETO comprehensive road network (figure 3-3).
As for the SEETO Comprehensive rail network, to improve 690 km of rail sections in very poor and poor condition approximately €625 million is needed. Whereas approximately €1.1 billion is required for the removal of rail bottlenecks on single and double track sections (255km). According to the used parameters, three rail sections on
Corridor X (Zapresic-Zagreb, Zagreb-Dugo Selo, Dugo Selo-Novska), require immediate attention due to their current condition and high traffic volumes (bottleneck sections). Total investment requirement of the SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network are estimated around 1.7 €billion.
This year’s MAP Priority List foresees construction and rehabilitation of 118.4 km of total 945 km estimated investment requirement sections on the SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network, as presented on the Figure 3-4. Implementation of the MAP 2013 rail projects would to contribute to 13% decrease of bottleneck and less developed segments (poor and very poor sections).
23
Figure 4-1: Road priority projects
4. MAP 2013 PRIORITY PROJECTSThe following chapter distinguishes two types of priority projects which are presented on two separate lists:
i) Priority projects eligible for funding – mature projects for which a comprehensive evaluation is available based on a completed feasibility study and, if available, additional full set of project documentation, in accordance with EU procedures for Programming and Procurement Rules.
ii) Priority projects for preparation – projects which require full project preparation and project evaluation to determine their feasibility. These projects are not ready for implementation but funding is required to carry out the necessary preparatory work.
SEETO priority projects rating methodology37 was adopted by the SEETO Steering Committee in July 2012 in order to provide Regional Participants and potential external financiers with an objective and consistent view on the quality of the projects nominated as relevant for the implementation of the SEETO Comprehensive Network.
37Document can be found at SEETO webpage - www.seetoint.org
Accordingly, the objective of the project rating is to present the strengths and weaknesses of the individual investment projects according to the agreed criteria.
The rating mechanism is applied on 22 submitted priority projects eligible for funding that do have Feasibility Study completed and are mature enough to start with the implementation process. Additionally, 20 priority projects that require preparatory activities are not rated but are included in the MAP 2013 in a separate list indicating that resources for project preparation are required.
High maturity of regional priorities is detected based on the fact that 72% of total required investments (€8.2 billion) are foreseen for implementation in priority projects eligible for funding.
Average score of all rated priority projects is 72%. By observing evaluation results by transport modes it can be seen that environmentally friendly transport modes projects - railways and inland waterways - have significantly higher average score (both 88%) than road projects (65%) which clearly shows their utmost importance in the SEE region. Investment cost enlisted in the priority projects list illustrates the amount of non secured funds needed for implementation of the project.
4.1 Priority projects eligible for funding
24
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Table 4- 1: Rating of priority projects eligible for funding
Corridor/ Route/ Node
Regional Participant
Project name Total cost
40% 40% 10% 10% Total
Road projects Scoring
Corridor Vc BIH Completion of motorway section Vukosavlje-Karuse
356 40 12 10 5 84%
BIH Completion of motorway section Karuse-Banlozi
889 40 12 10 5 84%
BIH Mostar bypass construction 36 40 12 10 5 84%
Coridor VIII ALB Upgrading of Qukes- Qafe Plloce road 100 40 12 -10 5 59%
Coridor X SER Completion of Belgrade by pass, Sector 6: Strazevica-Bubanj Potok
97 40 16 5 5 83%
Route 1 CRO Road connection to interchange Vucevica on Route 1 motorway
148 40 20 2.5 5 84%
Route 2a CRO Expressway: Hungary Border- Virovitica- Okucani- Bosnia and Herzegovina border BIH
55 12 40 2.5 5 60%
Route 2b BIH Upgrade of Brod na Drini (Foca) - Hum (Scepan Polje)
62 0 40 10 5 55%
Route 2c ALB Construction of Central East Corridor and Central South Corridor (Berat to Teplene)
210 20 12 5 5 53%
ALB New construction of By-pass of Rrogozhina
6 0 12 -10 5 9%
Route 4 MON Road Route 4, section Podgorica- Matesevo
502 0 20 10 5 44%
SER Construction of motorway Belgrade-South Adriatic, section Belgrade- Pozega
768 20 16 5 5 58%
Route 6 KOS Construction of Route 6, Section: Pristina- Hani i Elezit
378 40 40 10 2.5 93%
Route 7 KOS Construction section Pristina- Merdare 750 12 40 10 2.5 65%
Coridor X MAC Rehabilitation of road section Brezica- Miladinovci and Veles- Bezica
16 Rehabilitation project Detail Design completed
Rail projects Scoring
Corridor Vb CRO Railway reconstruction of section Dugo Selo- Krizevci
198 40 20 0 10 90%
Corridor VIII
MAC Construction of the railway section Kumanovo- Beljakovice- Kriva Palanka
591 40 40 7.5 5 95%
MAC Construction of new railway section Kicevo- border with Albania
470 20 40 7.5 10 79%
Route 10 KOS Railway Route 10 from central station Fushe Kosove/Kosovo Polje up to the Border Station with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Hani i Elezit/Djeneral Jankovic)
140 40 34 0 10 86%
Econ
omic
crite
riaRe
gion
al cr
iteria
Regu
lato
ry/
Tehn
ical
crite
riaEn
viro
men
tal
crite
ria
25
Figure 4- 2: Rail priority projects
Table 4- 1: Rating of priority projects eligible for funding
Corridor/ Route/ Node
Regional Participant
Project name Total cost
40% 40% 10% 10% Total
Road projects Scoring
Corridor Vc BIH Completion of motorway section Vukosavlje-Karuse
356 40 12 10 5 84%
BIH Completion of motorway section Karuse-Banlozi
889 40 12 10 5 84%
BIH Mostar bypass construction 36 40 12 10 5 84%
Coridor VIII ALB Upgrading of Qukes- Qafe Plloce road 100 40 12 -10 5 59%
Coridor X SER Completion of Belgrade by pass, Sector 6: Strazevica-Bubanj Potok
97 40 16 5 5 83%
Route 1 CRO Road connection to interchange Vucevica on Route 1 motorway
148 40 20 2.5 5 84%
Route 2a CRO Expressway: Hungary Border- Virovitica- Okucani- Bosnia and Herzegovina border BIH
55 12 40 2.5 5 60%
Route 2b BIH Upgrade of Brod na Drini (Foca) - Hum (Scepan Polje)
62 0 40 10 5 55%
Route 2c ALB Construction of Central East Corridor and Central South Corridor (Berat to Teplene)
210 20 12 5 5 53%
ALB New construction of By-pass of Rrogozhina
6 0 12 -10 5 9%
Route 4 MON Road Route 4, section Podgorica- Matesevo
502 0 20 10 5 44%
SER Construction of motorway Belgrade-South Adriatic, section Belgrade- Pozega
768 20 16 5 5 58%
Route 6 KOS Construction of Route 6, Section: Pristina- Hani i Elezit
378 40 40 10 2.5 93%
Route 7 KOS Construction section Pristina- Merdare 750 12 40 10 2.5 65%
Coridor X MAC Rehabilitation of road section Brezica- Miladinovci and Veles- Bezica
16 Rehabilitation project Detail Design completed
Rail projects Scoring
Corridor Vb CRO Railway reconstruction of section Dugo Selo- Krizevci
198 40 20 0 10 90%
Corridor VIII
MAC Construction of the railway section Kumanovo- Beljakovice- Kriva Palanka
591 40 40 7.5 5 95%
MAC Construction of new railway section Kicevo- border with Albania
470 20 40 7.5 10 79%
Route 10 KOS Railway Route 10 from central station Fushe Kosove/Kosovo Polje up to the Border Station with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (Hani i Elezit/Djeneral Jankovic)
140 40 34 0 10 86%
Corridor/ Route/ Node
Regional Participant
Project name Total cost
40% 40% 10% 10% Total
IWW projects Scoring
River Sava BIH Recostruction and modernization of River Port of Brcko
7 40 16 NA -5 64%
River Sava BIH Rehabilitation and improvment of the Sava river waterway
21 40 30 NA 10 100%
River Sava CRO Rehabilitation and improvment of the Sava river waterway
55 40 22 NA 10 90%
River Sava SER Rehabilitation and improvment of Sava river from Belgrade to Bosnia and Herzegovina border
30 40 30 NA 10 100%
Source: SEETO Ec
onom
ic cr
iteria
Regi
onal
crite
riaRe
gula
tory
/ Te
hnic
al cr
iteria
Envi
rom
enta
l
crite
ria
Continuation of table 4- 1: Rating of priority projects eligible for funding
26
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Table 4- 2: Priority projects for preparationCorridor/Route/Node
Regional Participant
Name of the project Length (km)
Foreseen source of funding (M€)
Total estimated cost for project implementation (M€)
Road projectsCorridor VIII ALB Construction of Elbasan By-pass 13 45
ALB Construction of Tirana By-pass 17 Budget (6.5 M€)IFI loans (32.5M€)EU funds (1 M€)
40
Corridor X MAC Rehabilitation of the road section Gradsko-Negotino
18 EU funds(4 M€) 4
Route 1 MON Road rehabilitation and widening on the section Debeli brijeg-Petrovac-Bar
8
Route 3 BIH Completion of By-pass East Sarajevo on a sections Mesici-Praca-Pale-Sarajevo Airport
87 391
Total estimated cost for project implementation (M€) 488Railway projectsCorridor X CRO Upgrade and reconstruction of railway
line Dugo Selo-Novska83.4 255
MAC Rehabilitation of Railway sections Kumanovo-Deljadrovce, Dracevo-Veles
49 175
SER Modernisation of the Nis-Presevo railway line
148 265
SER Reconstruction, modernisation and construction of the second track on the section Stalac-Djunis of the railway line Beograd-Nis
19 106
Corridor Xb SER Reconstruction and Modernisation of the railway line Belgrade-Novi Sad-Subotica-border with Hungary
148 665
Corridor Xd MAC Renewal with Reconstruction of the Railway Section Bitola-Kremenica,
16 Budget (8.6M€)EU funds (0.4M€)
9
Route 4 MON Rehabilitation of railway line Vrbnica-Bar (Kos-Trebjesica-Lutovo-Bratonozici-Bioce-Podgorica)
14
Total estimated cost for project implementation (M€) 1,489Airport projectsDubrovnik CRO Construction and modernisation of
Dubrovnik AirportIFI (22.1M€)EU funds(124.9M€)
147
Nis SER Technical and navigation modernisation of Airport Nis
10
Total estimated cost for project implementation (M€) 157IWW projectsRiver Sava - Port of Slavonski Brod
CRO Dangerous Goods Terminal Construc-tion in the area of Slavonski Brod Inland Port
Budget (0.9M€)EU funds (3.02M€)
4
River Danube- Port of Vukovar
CRO Reconstruction of Port of Vukovar-New Port East-phase 1
Budget (9.3M€)EU funds (14.9M€)
24
River Danube SER Training and dredging works on select-ed locations along the Danube River
Budget (2M€)EU funds (10M€)
12
Total estimated cost for project implementation (M€) 40
4.2 Priority projects for preparation
27
Corridor/Route/Node
Regional Participant
Name of the project Length (km)
Foreseen source of funding (M€)
Total estimated cost for project implementation (M€)
Seaport projectsPort of Zadar CRO Construction of new container terminal
- Port of ZadarBudget (6.3 M€)IFI loans (35.7M€)
42
Port of Rijeka CRO Constructions of container Terminal Krk 300Port of Sibenik CRO Connection coast Dobrika-Rogac in the
port of Sibenik4
Port of Split CRO Reconstruction of the rail tracks and switches in the North Port of Split
EU funds (3 M€) 3
Total estimated cost for project implementation (M€) 349
Continuation of table 4- 2: Priority projects for preparation
28
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.3 Presentation of road network projects by corridor/route4.3.1 Road Corridor Vc
Figure 4- 3: Overview of all projects on the Road Corridor Vc
Regional Participants:Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia
Total completed investments until 2011:€892 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: €421.2 million
Percentage of motorways or four lane roads: 13%
Traffic flows:6,254 AADT
Table 4- 3: Priority projects on the Road Corridor Vc from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 BIH Mostar By-pass construction Eligible for funding 84% 13.19 36.00
2 BIH Completion of motorway section Vukosavlje-Karuse
Eligible for funding 84% 13.19 356.00
3 BIH Completion of motorway section Karuse-Banlozi
Eligible for funding 84% 13.19 889.00
Total cost 1,281.00
Table 4- 4: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Corridor Vc
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
4 BIH Dobrinje-Visoko Completed 7.6 New construction
15.00
5 BIH Josanica-Podlugovi-Visoko-Kakanj*Completed
45 New construction
195.00
6 BIH Seslije-Samac*Completed
13 Rehabilitation 17.00
7 BIH Maglaj-Zepce-Zenica Completed Rehabilitation 0.66
8 BIH Jablanica-Potoci and Dracevo- bor-der BIH/CRO
Completed 24.04 Rehabilitation 2.10
9 BIH Nemila–Zenica-Lasva Completed 20.89 Rehabilitation 2.70
10 BIH Jablanica– Jablanica Completed 19.2 Rehabilitation 1.40
11 BIH Zepce-Nemila and Bradina-Ostrozac Completed 44.8 Rehabilitation 5.80
12 BIH Kakanj-Drivusa* Ongoing 17 New construction
135.00
29
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
13 BIH Bijaca-Zvirovici* Ongoing 10 New construction
215.00
14 BIH Tarcin-Suhodol* Ongoing 5 New construction
15 BIH Josanica-Butila, Lot 1* Ongoing 35 New construction
16 BIH Zenica By-pass* Ongoing New construction
17 CRO Osijek-Sredanci Completed 56 New construction
487.40
18 CRO Interchange Ploce-Ploce PortCompleted
8 New construction
165.00
19 CRO Interstate Bridge across the Sava River at Svilaj
Agreement signed
21.00
20 CRO Beli Manastir-Osijek-Sredanci - Svilaj Works ongo-ing
25.20
Total cost 1,288.26*Priority project
Continuation of table 4- 4: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Corridor Vc
30
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.3.2 Road Corridor VIII
Figure 4- 4: Overview of all projects on the Road Corridor VIII
Regional Participants:Albania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Total completed investments until 2011:€303 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: €377 million
Percentage of motorwaysor four lane roads: 33%
Traffic flows: 8,533 AADT AADT
Table 4- 5: Priority projects on the Road Corridor VIII from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 ALB Upgrading of Qukes - Qafe Plloce road Eligible for funding 59% 17.4 100.00
2 ALB New construction of By-pass of Rrogozhina
Eligible for funding 9% 6.40
3 ALB Construction of Elbasan By-pass For preparation 45.00
4 ALB Construction of Tirana By-pass For preparation 40.00
Total cost 191.40
Table 4- 6: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Corridor VIII
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (Sec-tion)
Project status Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
5 MAC Skopje By-pass Completed 27 New construction 120.36
6 ALB Lushnje-Fier-Vlore Completed 65 New construction 125.50
7 ALB Elbasan-Librazhd Completed 25 New construction 20.80
8 ALB Qafe Thane-Pogradec Completed 24 Rehabilitation 16.00
9 ALB Q.Plloce-Korce Completed 29 New construction 20.00
10 ALB Levan-Vlore Works ongoing 24
11 ALB Tirana-Elbasan Works ongoing 32 New construction 300.00
12 ALB Fier and Vlore by-passes Agreement signed
58.95
13 ALB Qafe Thane-Pogradec (up-grading) *
Works ongoing 32 New construction 17.90
Total cost 679.50*Priority project
31
4.3.3 Road Corridor X
Figure 4- 5: Overview of all projects on the Road Corridor X
Regional Participants:Croatia, Serbia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Total completed investments until 2011:€625.3 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: €1.1 billion
Percentage of motorways or four lane roads: 85% Traffic flows:14,040 AADT
Table 4- 7: Priority projects on the Road Corridor X from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 SER Completion of Belgrade By-pass, (Strazevica-Bubanj Potok)
Eligible for funding
83% 14.4 96.50
2 MAC Rehabilitation of road section Veles-Bezica and Brezica-Miladinovci
REHABILITATION PROJECT -Eligi-ble for funding
16.00
3 MAC Rehabilitation of sections Gradsko-Negotino For preparation 4.00
Total cost 116.50
Table 4- 8: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Corridor X
No Regional Participant
Section Project status Total length
Type of works
Total cost (M€)
4 MAC Negotino-Demir Kapija Completed 6.5 New construction
11.94
5 MAC Demir Kapija-Gevgelija Completed 17.3 Bridges 15.91
6 MAC Katlanovo-Veles Completed 23.63 Bridges 16.70
7 MAC Tabanovce-Kumanovo Completed 7.5 New construction
11.70
8 MAC Demir Kapija-Smokvica* Finance secured 28.2 Upgrading 265.00
9 MAC Katlanovo-Veles Works on-going 27.6 Rehabilitation na
10 MAC Miladinovci-Skopje Finance secured Rehabilitation of bridges
na
11 SER Belgrade By-pass, Sectors 1-4* Completed 25 New construction
218.00
12 SER Batrovci-Batajnica Completed 105 Upgrade 33.70
13 SER Pozarevac-Pecenjevce Completed 201 Rehabilitation 20.52
14 SER Belgrade-Nis Completed Rehabilitation 20.48
32
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
No Regional Participant
Section Project status Total length
Type of works
Total cost (M€)
15 SER Leskovac-Bujanovac* Completed 21.8 New construction
92.80
16 SER Pecenjevce-Grdelica-Predejane -Dzep-Presevo*
Completed 116.1 Rehabilitation 35.80
17 SER Gazela bridge Reconstruction Completed Rehabilitation 33.00
18 SER Belgrade By-pass (Batajnica inter-change) under construction
Works ongoing 60.00
19 SER Belgrade By-pass-Dovanovci inter-change and Surcin-Bubanj Potok rehabilitation
Works ongoing 80.00
20 SER Belgrade By-pass-Orlovaca inter-change-tunnels Strazevica and bridges
Works ongoing 40.00
21 SER Grabovnica-Levosoje * Works ongoing 89.9 New construction
596.70
22 SER Bujanovac-Presevo* Works ongoing 21.00 na
23 SER Belgrade By-pass, Sectors 5-6: Orlovaca-Bubanj Potok*
Finance secured 120.00
24 CRO Zupanja-Lipovac Completed 30 New construction
114.82
Total cost 1,787.00 *Priority project
Continuation of table 4- 8: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Corridor X
33
4.3.4 Road Route 1
Figure 4- 6: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 1
Regional Participants:Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro
Total completed investments until 2011:€1.1 billion
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: -
Percentage of motorwaysor four lane roads: 58%
Traffic flows:7,833 AADT
Table 4- 9: Priority projects on the Road Route 1 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 CRO Road connection to interchange Vucevica on Route 1 motorway
Eligible for funding 84% 18.63 148.16
2 MON Road rehabilitation and widening on the section Debeli brijeg-Petrovac-Bar
For preparation 8.00
Total cost 156.16
Table 4- 10: Completed and ongoing projects on the Road Route 1
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
3 MON Pcinja bridge Completed 0.2 Upgrade 0.86
4 MON Jaz-Zuta Greda Completed 0.5 Upgrade 0.50
5 MON Budva-Petrovac Completed 1.34 Upgrade 3.75
6 MON Kufin and Becici-Rafailovici-Kamenovo Completed 8.3 Upgrade 10.97
7 MON Sutomore-Bar Completed 1.35 Upgrade 2.00
8 MON Jok Megdan-junction Meljine Completed 1.4 Upgrade 2.60
9 MON Lepetani Completed 0.55 Upgrade 1.10
10 MON Kamenari Completed 0.6 Upgrade 3.20
11 MON Debeli Brijeg-Herceg Novi– Kotor Completed 1.02 Rehabilitation 0.66
12 MON Reconstruction of intersection Tivat-Radovići and section Budva - Kotor -Lepetani-Petrovac
Completed 4.902 Upgrade/Rehabilitation
1.60
13 MON Tivat-Radanovići-Budva-Kotor-Krtolska Completed New construction 1.00
14 CRO Ostarije-Split Completed 326 Rehabilitation 323.69
15 CRO Ravca-Vrgorac Completed 9.8 New construction 124.80
16 CRO Split-Ploce Completed 77 New construction 616.41
17 BIH Passage through Neum Completed 12.27 Upgrade 0.28
Total cost 1,093.00
34
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.3.5 Road Route 2a
Figure 4- 7: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 2a
Regional Participants:Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia
Total completed investments until 2011:€169.3 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: -
Percentage of motorwaysor four lane roads: 20%
Traffic flows:4,189 AADT
Table 4- 11: Priority projects on the Road Route 2a from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 CRO Expressway construction of Okucani -border BiH
Eligible for funding 60% 9.2 55.00
Total cost 55.00
Table 4- 12: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 2a
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length Type of works Total cost
2 BIH By-pass Banja Luka Completed 1.2 Rehabilitation 1.34
3 BIH D. Vakuf-Travnik-Lasva Completed Rehabilitation 1.43
4 BIH Turbe-Travnik-Dolac Completed 8.48 Rehabilitation 0.69
5 BIH Podmilacje –Jajce- Donji Vakuf and D.Vakuf-Turbe-Travnik
Completed Rehabilitation 1.85
6 BIH Gradiska-Mahovljani-Banja Luka Completed 53 New construction
164.00
Total cost 169.31
35
4.3.6 Road Route 2b
Figure 4- 8: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 2b
Regional Participants:Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro
Total completed investments until 2011:€ 49.4 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: € 32.2 million
Percentage of motorways
or four lane roads: 0
Traffic flows:3,927 AADT
Table 4- 13: Priority projects on the Road Route 2b from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 BIH Upgrade of Brod na Drini (Foca)-Hum (Scepan Polje)
Eligible for funding 47% 8.45 62.00
Total cost 62.00
Table 4- 14: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Road Route 2b
No Regional Participant
Section Project status Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
2 MON Podgorica-Bozaj Completed 4.6 Upgrade 0.86
3 MON Scepan Polje bridge Completed 0.1 Rehabilitation 0.36
4 MON Modernisation of route 2b Completed 24 Upgrade 3.46
5 MON Border crossings Debeli Brijeg and Scepan Polje
Completed 1 Rehabilitation 0.40
6 MON Niksic By-pass Completed 5 7.36
7 MON Niksic- Podgorica Completed 4.4 Upgrade 9.64
8 MON Crossroad Danilovgrad Completed New construction 3.48
9 MON Lanslide Goransko Completed 0.03 Rehabilitation 0.14
10 ALB Fushe Kruje-Vore Completed 13 Rehabilitation 11.00
11 ALB Buna bridge Completed 0.5 New construction 9.36
12 ALB Hani Hotit-Shkoder* Works ongoing
39 Upgrading 32.20
13 BIH Dobrinja-Bogatic Completed 17.6 0.73
14 BIH Dobrinja-Bogatic Completed 44.1 Rehabilitation 1.20
15 BIH Trnovo-Dobro Polje Completed 45.3 1.41
Total cost 81.60*Priority project
36
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.3.7 Road Route 2c
Figure 4- 9: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 2c
Regional Participants:Albania
Total completed investments until 2011:€ 19.5 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: € 44 million
Percentage of motorwaysor four lane roads: 25%
Traffic flows: 3,217 AADT
Table 4- 15: Priority projects on the Road Route 2c from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 ALB Construction of Central East Corridor and Central South Corridor (Berat to Tepelene)
Eligible for funding 53% 10.67 210.00
Total cost 210.00
Table 4- 16: Completed and finance secured/ ongoing projects on the Road Route 2c
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost
2 ALB Tepelene-Gjirokaster Completed 23 Rehabilitation 19.50
3 ALB Tepelene and Gjirokaster By-pass* Finance secured
23.50 New construction
44.00
Total cost 63.50 *Priority project
37
4.3.8 Road Route 3
Figure 4- 10: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 3
Regional Participants:Bosnia and Herzegovina
Total completed investments until 2011:€ 1.3 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: -
Percentage of motorwaysor four lane roads: 0
Traffic flows:2,115 AADT
Table 4- 17: Priority projects on the Road Route 3 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 BIH Completion of By-pass East Sarajevo,(Mesici-Praca-Pale-Sarajevo Airport)
For preparation 391.00
Total cost 391.00
Table 4- 18: Completed and finance secured/ ongoing projects on the Road Route 3
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length Type of works
Total cost (M€)
2 BIH Reconstruction of tunnel Celjigovici
Completed 0.58 Rehabilitation 1.30
Total cost 1.30
38
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.3.9 Road Route 4
Figure 4- 11: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 4
Regional Participants:Montenegro, Serbia
Total completed investments until 2011:€ 285.2 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: € 308 million
Percentage of motorwaysor four lane roads: 7%
Traffic flows:5,825 AADT
Table 4- 19: Priority projects on the Road Route 4 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 MON Road Route 4, section Podgorica-Matesevo
Eligible for funding 44% 4.5 501.60
2 SER Construction of motorway section Belgrade-Pozega
Eligible for funding 58% 10.79 786.00
Total cost 1,287.60
Table 4- 20: Completed and finance secured/ ongoing projects on the Road Route 4
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
3 MON Eastern mini by-pass Podgorica* Completed 6.5 New construction 20.00
4 MON Podgorica airport junction and Gol-ubovci By-pass
Completed 12.8 Upgrade 73.54
5 MON Rehabilitation of sections on Route 4 Completed 48.4 Rehabilitation 136.35
6 SER Vladimirovac – Vrsac Completed 36 Rehabilitation 10.14
7 SER Pancevo-Vliadimirci Completed 24 Rehabilitation 5.20
8 SER Beograd –Pancevo Completed 11 Rehabilitation 2.80
9 SER Stopanja –Nevade Completed 11.85 Rehabilitation 3.30
10 SER Borova Glava - Kokin Brod- Kolovrat- Gostun Montenegro border
Completed 88 Rehabilitation 33.87
11 SER Ljig-Preljina* Works ongoing
40.36 New construction 308.00
Total cost 593.20*Priority project
39
4.3.10 Road Route 6a
Figure 4- 12: Overview of all projects on the Road Route 6a
Regional Participants:The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Kosovo, Serbia
Total completed investments until 2011: €157.44 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: -
Percentage of motorwaysor four lane roads: 5%
Traffic flows:5,074 AADT
Table 4- 21: Priority projects on the Road Route 6a from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 KOS Construction of Route 6a, Section: Pristina-Hani i Elezit/Djeneral Jankovic
Eligible for funding 93% 12 378.00
Total cost 378.00
Table 4- 22: Completed and finance secured/ ongoing projects on the Road Route 6a
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
2 MON Ibar 2 bridge Completed 0.2 Upgrade 0.90
3 MON Rozaje-Spiljani Completed 0.3 Upgrade 0.50
4 MON Rozaje-Spiljane Completed 26 Rehabilitation 3.76
5 MON Rozaje By-pass I phase Completed 3.41 Upgrade 7.50
6 MON Bac 1, Bac 2 and Ibar 3 bridges Completed 0.4 Upgrade 2.16
7 MON Berane- Completed 3.11 New construction 7.36
8 MON Bridge Bijela crkva 2 Completed 0.06 Rehabilitation 0.42
9 MON Bridge Ajkunici Completed 0.09 Rehabilitation 0.64
10 SER Spiljani-Ribaric Completed Rehabilitation 13.50
11 KOS Pristina-Lipljan Completed 8.6 12.70
12 KOS Pristina-Shkabaj Completed 3.3 11.60
13 KOS Bridges on the existing road section Kaqanik/Kacanik-Hani I Elezi/Djeneral Jankovic
Completed 7.40
14 KOS Pristina-Peje/Pec-Montenegro Completed 8 Upgrade 78.00
15 KOS Pristina-Mitrovice Completed 3 Upgrade 11.00
Total cost 157.44
40
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.3.11 Road Route 7
Figure 4- 13 : Overview of all projects on the Road Route 7
Regional Participants:Montenegro, Serbia
Total completed investments until 2011:€ 1,313 billion
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: € 330 million
Percentage of motorwaysor four lane roads: 44%
Traffic flows:3,821 AADT
Table 4- 23: Priority projects on the Road Route 7 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 KOS Construction of Route 7, Pristina-Merdare
Eligible for funding 65% 8.25 750.00
Total cost 750.00
Table 4- 24: Completed and finance secured/ ongoing projects on Road Route 7
No Regional Participant
Project Section/Name of the Project Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost
2 SER Doljevac-Zitoradja-Prokuplje Completed 13 Rehabilitation 5.50
3 ALB Milot-Rreshen* Completed 26 New construction
30.00
4 ALB Rreshen-Kalimash* Completed 61 New construction
825.00
5 ALB Kalimash-Morine* Completed 5 New construction
122.70
6 KOS Motorway Morine-Suha reka* Completed 38 New construction
330.00
7 KOS Construction of motorway (Suha Reka-Pristina)*
Ongoing 43.3 330.00
Total cost 1,643.20*Priority project
41
4.4 Presentation of rail network projects by corridor/route4.4.1 Rail Corridor Vb
Figure 4- 14: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor Vb
Regional Participants: Total completed investments until 2011: -
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: € 31 million
Percentage of double track sections and traction: -electrified
Traffic flows:177 million pkm717 million tkm
Table 4- 25: Priority projects on the Corridor Vb from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 CRO Upgrade and construction of second track on railway line section Dugo Selo-Krizevci
Eligible for funding 90% 10.91 198.03
Total cost 198.03
Table 4- 26: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Corridor Vb
No Regional Participant
Section Status Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
2 CRO Krizevci-Koprivnica Works ongoing Rehabilitation 31.00
Total cost 31.00
42
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.4.2 Rail Corridor VIII
Figure 4- 15: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor VIII
Regional Participants:Albania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Total completed investments until 2011: -Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: -Percentage of double track sections and traction: -dieselTraffic flows:34 million pkm81 million tkm
Table 4- 27: Priority projects on the Corridor VIII from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 MAC Construction of new railway section Kicevo – border with Albania
Eligible for funding 79% 6.67 470.00
2 MAC Constuction of the railway section Kumanovo-Beljakovce-Kriva Palanka
Eligible for funding 95% 11.84 591.00
Total cost 1,061.00
43
4.4.3 Rail Corridor X
Figure 4- 16: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor X
Regional Participants: Total completed investments until 2011:€ 203.1 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: € 107.6 million
Percentage of double track sections and traction: 28%electrified
Traffic flows:1,352 million pkm3,093 million tkm
Table 4- 28: Priority projects on the Corridor X from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 CRO Upgrade and reconstruction of railway line Dugo Selo-Novska
For preparation 255.00
2 MAC Rehabilitation sections Kumanovo-Deljadrovce, and Dracevo-Veles
For preparation 175.00
3 SER Modernisation and construction of the second track on the section Stalac-Djunis
For preparation 105.55
4 SER Modernisation of the Nis-Presevo railway line For preparation 265.00
Total cost 800.55
Table 4- 29: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Corridor X
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost(M€)
5 CRO Rail track overhaul on Vinkovci-Tovarnik section
Completed 33.9 Rehabilitation/ Upgrade
75.76
6 CRO Equipment for maintenance, modernisation and construction
Completed Rehabilitation /New construction
19.57
7 CRO Remote rail control traffic system Savski Marof-Zagreb-Tovarnik*
Completed 23.43
8 CRO Okucani to Novska railway rehabilitation*
Works ongo-ing
19.50 Rehabilitation 40.10
9 CRO Zagreb Main Station Signalling and Interlocking System*
Works ongo-ing
_ Rehabilitation 11.64
10 MAC Station-Tabanovci Completed 0.617 New construction 0.79
11 MAC Station Skopje Jug and Madzari Skopje Jug section
Completed 2.3 Upgrade 0.69
44
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost(M€)
12 MAC Station Kadina Reka Completed 0.5 Rehabilitation 0.88
13 MAC Gradsko-Sivec Completed 2.5 Rehabilitation 0.20
14 MAC Pcinja-Rajko Zinzifov-Veles Completed 4.5 Rehabilitation 0.52
15 MAC Crossrail A- Ilinden Completed 4.2 Rehabilitation 0.46
16 MAC Negotino -Dubrovo-Demir Kapija Completed 9.6 Rehabilitation 1.89
17 MAC Klisura-Gevgelija Completed 37 Upgrade 0.78
18 MAC Telecomanding regulation of traffic on section Tabanovci -Gevgelija and optic-fiber cable, including common control system center Trubarevo
Completed 215 Rehabilitation 1.13
19 MAC Rail signalling and telecommunica-tions*
Finances allocated
215 Upgrading 6.00
20 MAC Tabanovce-Kumanovo and Miravci-Smokvica *
Finance secured
Rehabilitation
21 MAC Negotino-Nogaevci* Finance secured
Rehabilitation
22 SER Kusadak - Velika Plana Completed 22.9 Rehabilitation 16.40
23 SER Nova Pazova - Stara Pazova Completed 8 Rehabilitation 3.00
24 SER Batajnica - Golubinci Completed 24 Rehabilitation 30.00
25 SER Jovac – Cuprija Completed 10.5 Rehabilitation 27.60
26 SER Gilje - Cuprija- Paracin Finance secured
10.5 Upgrade /New construction
41.00
27 SER Gilje - Cuprija- Paracin, bridge over Velika Morava
Finance secured
New construction 8.88
Total cost 310.72 *Priority project
Continuation of table 4- 29: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Corridor X
45
4.4.4 Rail Corridor Xb
Figure 4- 17: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor Xb
Regional Participants: Total completed investments until 2011:€13.4 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: Percentage of double track sections and traction: -99% electrified
Traffic flows:71 million pkm648 million tkm
Table 4- 30: Priority projects on the Corridor Xb from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 SER Reconstruction and Modernisation of the railway line Belgrade-Novi Sad-Subotica- border with Hungary
For preparation 665.00
Total cost 665.00
Table 4- 31: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Corridor Xb
No Regional Participant
Section Status Total length Type of works Total cost (M€)
2 SER Cortanovci-Petrovaradin Completed 15 Rehabilitation 13.40
Total cost 13.40
46
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.4.5 Rail Corridor Xd
Figure 4- 18: Overview of all projects on the Rail Corridor Xd
Regional Participants: Total completed investments until 2011:
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011:
Percentage of double track sections and traction: -diesel
Traffic flows:62 million pkm1.3 million tkm
Table 4- 32: Priority projects on the Corridor Xd from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 MAC Rehabilitation of sections Bitola-Kremenica
For preparation 9.00
Total cost 9.00
47
4.4.6 Rail Route 4
Figure 4- 19: Overview of all projects on the Rail Route 4
Regional Participants: Total completed investments until 2011: €99.17 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: €40.95 million
Percentage of double track sections and traction: 4% 31% electrified
Traffic flows:111 million pkm698 million tkm
Table 4- 33: Priority projects on the Route 4 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 MON Rehabilitation of the rail line Vrbnica-Bar (Kos-Trebjesica-Lutovo-Bratonozici-Bioce-Podgorica)
For preparation 14.00
Total cost 14.00
Table 4- 34: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Rail Route 4
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
2 MON Trebesnica-Lutovo-Bratonozic Completed 0.3 Rehabilitation 2.24
3 MON Mojkovac and siding Trebaljevo Completed 12.0 Rehabilitation 3.60
4 MON „Mojkovac“ Completed 3.5 tunnels 3.52
5 MON Vrbnica-Bijelo polje and 3 track in station Bijelo Polje
Completed 12.5 Rehabilitation 2.60
6 MON Bridges at line Vrbnica-Bar Completed 1.8 2.00
7 MON Station Bar Completed Rehabilitation 0.60
8 MON station Bijelo Polje and siding Krusevo Completed 2.4 New construc-tion
0.90
9 MON landslide at Podgorica-Bar, section Virpazar-Sutomore and Sutomore-Bar
Completed 1.0 Rehabilitation 5.00
10 MON Trebaljevo-Kolasin, Kos and Trebesica Completed 2.1 Tunnels 5.86
11 MON Sanation of slope at 6 locations and bulding 3 protective planes
Completed 0.5 6.86
12 MON Trebesica and siding Bratonozic Completed 0.5 Rehabilitation 1.80
48
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
13 MON Bijelo Polje-Krusevo-Mijatovo kolo Completed 18.5 Rehabilitation 15.60
14 MON Railway line Trebaljevo-Kolasin Completed 10.3 Rehabilitation 5.00
15 MON Railway line Bijelo polje-Krusevo-Mijatovo kolo
Completed 17.6 Rehabilitation 14.00
16 MON Sanation of 4 slopes and three protection galleries on section Trebesica-Lutovo
Completed Rehabilitation 3.30
17 MON Superstructure works of the railway line Vrbnica-Bar section Kolasin-Podgorica-Bar
Completed 114.5 New construc-tion
0.99
18 SER Belgrade - Bar section Resnik - Vreoci – Valjevo
Completed 41.0 Rehabilitation 18.50
19 MON Sanation of tunnel no.175 section Trebaljevo-Kos and no.185 section Kos-Trebesica
Completed Rehabilitation 1.09
20 MON Sanation of tunnel no.171 and no. 173 Completed Rehabilitation 1.77
21 MON Sanation of two slopes (Lutovski potok anf Bratonozici)
Completed Rehabilitation 1.78
22 MON Sanation of tunnel Ostrovica (no.182) Completed Rehabilitation 2.16
23 MON Rehabilitation of Vrbnica-Podgorica-Bar railway line*
Works ongoing
159.0 14.1
24 MON Rehabilitation of Kolasin-Trebaljevo section in progress
Works ongoing
11.4 5.00
25 MON Rehabilitation of line Kolasin-Kos with run-ning line in st. Kos and secondary station tracks
In preparation
12.1 Rehabilitation 5.00
26 MON Reconstruction of tunnels no. 187,190,193,205,206
In preparation
1.9 Reconstruction 4.00
27 MON Hydrotechnical works on the culverts and bridges
In preparation
0.1 Works 0.50
28 MON Regulation of streams in the area of rein-forced - concrete bridges and culverts repair
In preparation
Works 0.35
29 MON Electrification of tracks VI I VII in st. Bijelo Polje
Completed tender
Rehabilitation
Total cost 128.12
Continuation of table 4- 34: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Rail Route 4
49
4.4.7 Rail Route 10
Figure 4- 20: Overview of all projects on the Rail Route 10
Regional Participants: Total completed investments until 2011: €6.22 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: -Percentage of double track sections and traction: -dieselTraffic flows:53 million pkm109 million tkm
Table 4- 35: Priority projects on the Route 10 from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 KOS Reconstruction of section - central sta-tion Fushe Kosove/Kosovo Polje up to the Border Station Hani i Elezit/Djeneral Jankovic
Eligible for funding 86% 9.17 141.85
Total cost 141.85
Table 4- 36: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on the Rail Route 10
No Regional Participant
Section Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
2 KOS Centralised Traffic Control System - CTC Completed 0.96
3 KOS Level Crossings Completed 0.62
4 KOS Centralized Traffic Control System, Active Transmission System, 4 railway crossing and fibre optic cables
Completed Rehabilitation 1.76
5 KOS Interface Interlocking, axel counters and rails type S49
Completed 1.38
6 KOS Supply with track materials, signalling and telecomm. and CTC Interlocking
Completed Rehabilitation 1.50
Total cost 6.22
50
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.5 Airports
Figure 4- 21: Overview of all projects on airports
Regional Participants:All
Total completed investments until 2011:€ 318.8 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: € 125 million
Table 4- 37: Priority projects on the airports from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 CRO Construction of airport Dubrovnik For preparation 147.00
2 SER Technical and navigation modernisation of Airport Nis
For preparation 10.00
Total cost 157.00
Table 4- 38: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on airports
No Regional Participant
Node Name of the Project Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
3 MON Podgorica Passenger terminal at Podgorica Completed New construction
26.00
4 MON Podgorica Podgorica Airports Completed Upgrade 11.36
5 MON Podgorica Podgorica Airport Completed Upgrade 26.02
6 MON Tivat Tivat Airport Completed Upgrade 10.00
7 MON Tivat Apron extension at Tivat Airport Completed Upgrade 5.40
8 CRO Zagreb Zagreb Airport Completed New construction
22.17
9 CRO Dubrovnik Dubrovnik Airport Completed New construction
29.60
10 CRO Split Split Completed New construction
12.00
11 CRO Zadar Zadar Completed Upgrade 1.17
12 CRO Zagreb Concession for Zagreb Airport to ZAIC consortium to build a new passenger terminal at Zagreb Airport
Agreement signed
51
No Regional Participant
Node Name of the Project Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
13 MAC Skopje Modernising Skopje Airport Completed New construction
110.00
14 MAC Ohrid Modernising Ohrid Airport Completed Rehabilitation 10.00
15 SER Belgrade Belgrade Airport Completed Rehabilitation 6.80
16 SER Belgrade Belgrade Airport * Completed Upgrade 26.80
17 SER Belgrade Belgrade Completed 4 Rehabilitation 0.23
18 BIH Sarajevo Sarajevo Airport Completed Upgrade 2.27
19 BIH Banja Luka Banja Luka Airport Completed 2.5 Upgrade 3.50
20 BIH Sarajevo Expansion of the passanger termi-nal, construction of a new rapid runway and aircraft parking apron expansion
Finances alocated
25.00
21 KOS Pristina Pristina Airport* Completed Rehabilitation 15.50
22 KOS Airport Rehabilitation of Pristina Airport Ongoing 100
Total cost 443.82*Priority project
Continuation of table 4- 38: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on airports
52
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
4.6 Inland waterways and river ports
Figure 4- 22: Overview of all projects on the inland waterways and river ports
Regional Participants: All
Total completed investments until 2011: € 23.74 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: -
Table 4- 39: Priority projects on the inland waterways and river ports from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 BIH Reconstruction and modernisation of River Port of Brcko
Eligible for funding 64% 12 6.50
2 BIH Rehabilitation and improvement of the Sava river waterway
Eligible for funding 100% 20.2 22.60
3 CRO Rehabilitation and Improvement of the Sava river Waterway
Eligible for funding 90% 19 55.00
4 CRO Dangerous Goods Terminal Construc-tion in the area of Slavonski Brod Inland Port
For preparation 4.00
5 CRO Reconstruction of Port of Vukovar - New Port East - phase 1
For preparation 24.17
6 SER Rehabilitation and improvement of Sava River
Eligible for funding 100% 6 30.00
7 SER Training and dredging works on select-ed locations along the Danube River
For preparation 12.00
Total cost 154.27
Table 4- 40: Completed and finance secured/ongoing projects on inland waterways and river ports
No Regional Participant
Section Project Status Total length
Type of works
Total cost (M€)
8 CRO Danube river Completed Upgrade 5.75
9 CRO Sava river Completed Upgrade 6.99
10 SER Danube river RIS Completed Upgrade 11.00
Total cost 23.74
53
4.7 Seaports
Figure 4- 23: Overview of all projects on seaports
Regional Participants:All
Total completed investments until 2011:€ 192.4 million
Total finance secured/ongoing investments until 2011: € 356.8 million
Table 4- 41: Priority projects on the seaports from the MAP 2013 priority projects list
No Regional Participant
Name of the project (section) Priority project type
Rating Points
EIRR Total cost (M€)
1 CRO Construction of new container terminal - Port of Zadar
For preparation 9.8 42.00
2 CRO Container Terminal KRK (Rijeka Seaport) For preparation 300.00
3 CRO Connection coast Dobrika-Rogac in the port of Sibenik
For preparation 4.20
4 CRO Reconstruction of the rail tracks and switches in the North Port of Split
For preparation 3.00
Total cost 349.20
Table 4- 42: Completed and finance secured/ ongoing projects on seaports
No Regional Participant
Node Name of the Project Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
5 CRO Rijeka Rijeka port Completed New construction
15.31
6 CRO Split Split port Completed New construction
11.79
7 CRO Ploce Ploce port Completed Rehabilitation 43.00
8 CRO Dubrovnik Docking shore Completed Rehabilitation 31.00
9 CRO Dubrovnik Construction and development of berths 10-16
Completed Rehabilitation 26.5
10 CRO Split Split port Completed 3.78
11 CRO Ploce Ploce port Completed 0.9 New construction
0.96
54
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
No Regional Participant
Node Name of the Project Project status
Total length
Type of works Total cost (M€)
12 CRO Ploce New container terminal of 60,000 container units capacity
Completed New construction
33.60
13 CRO Dubrovnik International passenger termi-nal*
Completed New construction
26.50
14 CRO Sibenik Maritime passenger terminal expansion of the pier up to 260 metres length
Works ongoing
12.00
15 CRO Rijeka Construction of 330 meters dock, annual capacity increase of the container turnover to 600,000 TEU
Finances allocated
New construction
70.00
16 CRO Ploce Container terminal and bulk cargo terminal
Works ongoing
New construction
50.00
17 CRO Seaport Transport and Trade Integration (TTI), Port Ploce*
Works ongoing
Rehabilitation 141.00
18 ALB Durres Durres passenger terminal and rehabilitation of berth 7 and 8 are in process
Works ongoing
New construction
20.00
19 ALB Durres Berth 10 in eastern part under construction
Works ongoing
8.50
20 ALB Vlora Ro-Ro ships berth and berth of cargo operation
Works ongoing
15.30
21 ALB Durres Rehabilitation of Port of Durres/ Ferry Terminal Building and Yard in Port of Durres*
Concession Contract signed
Rehabilitation 40.00
Total cost 549.24*Priority project
Continuation of table 4- 42: Completed and finance secured/ ongoing projects on seaports
55
5. TRANSPORT POLICY OUTLOOK
The evolving political context in which Croatia is basically fully integrated with the TEN-T network and EU Common Transport Market and Policy, while Montenegro has opened accession negotiations, gives even a greater impulse for the entire region to further enhance the regional transport planning, to address the outstanding issues in the complex reform process in many transport sectors and, by that, to reach satisfactory level of regional and EU integration in the field of transport.
5.1 Overview of the progress in the SEETO transport horizontal measures with regional added valueDuring 2011-2012, the SEETO focused on a few targeted areas of interventions which were identified in the SEETO Strategic Work Programme 2012-201438 as the SEETO Project Tasks for which continuous efforts and external support is needed. The objectives of these horizontal measures, the undertaken steps in relatively short period and the possible steps forward, are outlined as it follows.
5.1.1 Railway reform
With a purpose to map the progress achieved in implementation of the railway reform process regarding the Addendum to the MoU for creation of a South East European Railway Transport Area, the SEETO has prepared an analytical Report on South East Europe Railway Reform Progress 39 , released in July 2012. It intends to assist SEETO Regional Participants in further planning of the reforms and to seek support for the following particular priority measures proposed and elaborated within the Report, in consultations with the SEETO Railway Working Group, under the auspices of which, those measures are expected to be further addressed:
• Transparent and non-discriminatory access to rail terminal and terminal service, in particular in sea and inland ports and challenges of (private) sidings
• Concessioning of rail infrastructure maintenance and management
• Calculation of railway infrastructure track access charge with special accent on direct costs
• Performance scheme, framework contracts and authorised applicants
• Train driver licensing and certification, examiners and training facilities
• Cross acceptance of rolling stock
These endorsed regional railway priorities are concomitant to the major institutional and regulatory measures envisaged by the Addendum. The implementation of the latter should be underpinned at national level if the creation of the integrated railway area and common railway market in the region is not to remain only a far-fetched goal, but a reality for the businesses and passengers.
5.1.2 Border-crossing facilitation
Assuming the complexity and the cross-cutting nature of this area of intervention, the SEETO engaged in establishing cooperation with the CEFTA Secretariat and current IFC Trade Logistic Project in order to identify the possible priorities and measures in this field.
Following the general recommendations from the EC supported Workshop on border-crossing facilitation held in March 2012 in Podgorica, the SEETO produced a Report on border crossing facilitation40, endorsed in July 2012, which gives an extensive overview of the current projects, systems, and initiatives designed to address the existing non-physical transport barriers in the Western Balkans region, as well as the possible role that SEETO, by interfacing with relevant organisations, can play in transport and trade facilitation.
Apart from the knowledge-experience-best practise transferring through joint technical meetings of relevant stakeholders in the region, the Report comes up with other recommendations, too, which can broadly be described as follows:
• identification of genuine cross border priority investment projects on the SEETO Comprehensive Network that will have impact on improving the services on the BC points and quality of infrastructure, on reducing the border crossing waiting times and ease the trade for particular products in the supply chain,
• monitoring and advising on the implementation of the transport acquis related to the access to market of the transport hauliers, liberalisation of services, improving the operations, etc.
• stimulating the dialogue with the transport operators, forwarding and logistic companies and trade unions,
• developing a set of technical, policy and political actions, tailored to a specific transport axis, whereby all measures to be undertaken for reducing travel times and transport costs are going to be identified and pinpointed accompanied with appropriate physical and non-physical investment plan (see more in Chapter 5.3.2).
In the past years, the SEETO observed a positive trend of harmonisation of the segmented national transport policies and steady efforts towards coordinated regional transport policy. With the EU Common Transport policy seen as a major driving force for integration of the Western Balkans transport market and contributor to the future economic growth of the region, the SEETO platform plays a crucial role in bridging the gaps between the Regional Participants’ transport strategies coordinated at regional level and the EU Common Transport Policy, the integration to which, remains their ultimate goal.
38 The Strategic Work Programme 2012-2014 is available on www.seetoint.org39 The Report is available on www.seetoint.org 40 The Report is available on www.seetoint.org
56
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
5.1.3 Road safety auditing
The SEETO Secretariat continued to exercise expert and technical support to the Road Safety working group by elaborating a detailed questionnaire to the Regional Participants on the Implementation of Directive EC 2008/96 on road infrastructure safety management, on the basis of which a Road Safety Audit Implementation Report is being prepared41, assessing the particular needs for road safety training programmes.
The SEETO is currently negotiating with possible partner institutions which can develop training curricula in road safety auditing and afterwards, deliver regional trainings for auditors’ trainers.
5.2 Regional Transport StudyThe MAP 2012 proposed conducting a Regional Transport Study, highlighting it as an important milestone for supporting and maintaining a coherent regional transport policy. In the course of the year 2012, the SEETO Secretariat made a significant contribution in preparation of the WBIF application for Regional Transport Study (update of REBIS) to be carried out by the World Bank, which was supported by NIPAC offices from the Regional Participants, and subsequently approved by the WBIF Steering Committee for financing in June 2012.
This confirms the value and benefits of sound policy planning at regional level done through the MAP, as well as the ownership of the SEETO Regional Participants over the Study and regional transport planning process in general.
The Study is expected to deliver the following outcomes:
• Review the existing forecasting model developed under the 2003 REBIS which was based on population and GDP growth assumptions, with some correction factors, including trade flows; upgrade the traffic forecasts and scenarios, in order to assess existing and projected transport needs on the SEETO Comprehensive Network
• Determine the priority routes/corridors within the SEETO Comprehensive Network, as a sort of predecessor of the future SEETO Core Network
• Analysis of identified main routes/corridors - based on the priority corridors within the SEETO Comprehensive Network emerging from the strategy update, identify both physical and non-physical bottlenecks in these corridors
• Develop a Priority Action Plan - identifying priorities in the SEETO Comprehensive network for removal of both physical and non-physical barriers
The results from the Regional Transport Study update, should give an impetus for new or revised approach in the national transport strategies which should eventually lead to more accurately defined and well harmonised regional strategic objectives in the area of transport.
5.3 Regional transport policy monitoring mechanism
5.3.1 Institutional and Regulatory framework monitoring
In the course of designing and implementing the SEETO soft measures in the previous years, it had become clear that harmonisation at regional level of the implementation of the acquis communautiare in transport field is vital to ensure regional coherence, generate potential synergies, as well as to give right signals to the international community and investors. Not only this is directly linked to the European integration process of the SEE Partners, but is also a condition for improving transport operations, increasing quality of transport services and overall enhancing of efficiency performance of the transport system as a whole.
The role of SEETO in this process is fully understood by the relevant structures and since the scope and extent of the acquis is large and quite substantial, creating a mechanism for monitoring of compliance and implementation of EU transport acquis, will certainly provide a common ground for better quality assessment of the institutional and regulatory framework, as well as for identifying and instigating future measures and activities for harmonisation, restructuring and reforming the sector. This mechanism will pave the way for early implementation of the Transport Community Treaty.
The core elements of the monitoring mechanism in broad sense will be:
• creation of a matrix of most pertinent principles and provisions from the EU transport policy and EU Regulations and Directives, notably the ones enclosed in the Annexes of the draft Transport Community Treaty,
• information sharing and reporting on the actions undertaken by the respective transport authorities in the Regional Participants for the specific heading from the matrix, through submission of relevant legal acts with tables of concordance as well as other relevant information related to strengthening of the institutional capacities, track records and implementation of bilateral or international agreements (SEETO has already started gathering different strategic and legislative documents in the efforts to create a comprehensive library),
• regional data base supported by information software which will feed the monitoring mechanism by recording and updating the progress made in implementation and enforcement of the transport legislation and standards, on the basis of designed questionnaires,
• advising the Regional Participants with regard to the compliance of specific acts with the general EU policy or legislation in that particular field, using the networking potential with the relevant services of the EC and different national, regional and international institutions
41 The Report is available on www.seetoint.org
57
• participation/observation to different EC - Regional Participants dialogue forums, under the Stabilisation and Association Agreements, accession negotiations and specific peer/assessment missions
• identification of gaps emerging from the lack or delayed transposition and enforcement of legislation, aiming to develop action plan and soft measures to address them in certain sub-sectors, using also the SEETO Working Groups, EC supported regional workshops and TAIEX regional trainings.
The monitoring mechanism is expected to be beneficial both for the Regional Participants and the European Commission, as it will assist the EC to measure the real progress of the region in alignment with the EU Transport policy and to target its assistance in the areas that need further interventions, as well as it will provide a competition ground among the Regional Participants in efforts to harmonise their national policies, thereby ensuring effective coordination of the regional transport policy.
Ensuring regional harmonisation of regulatory framework is extremely important for creating common market conditions and homogenous rules among the Regional Participants which will have significant impact to the transport operations and quality of services. For instance, in the road sector, if different rules are applicable regarding the EU requirements for good reputation, professional competence and financial standing to be satisfied by operators wishing to engage in road transport42 , it can produce certain inconsistencies and moreover, these heterogeneous rules do not allow for a level playing field and lead to a higher propensity of transport carriers which poorly comply with road safety and social rules.
The institutional and regulatory monitoring has been performed to a certain extent in the railway sector and in the area of road safety auditing. Nevertheless, the new SEETO mechanism aims to include all transport sectors, excluding the air transport where different competent structures are already in place.
It is worthy to extent the scope of the monitoring mechanism for the SEE partners also over the main EU policy and strategy documents, such as the 2011 White Paper for Transport43 and sector specific EU/regional strategies44. Given the aim of the Regional Participants to integrate into the EU common transport area, the monitoring mechanism will stimulate them in formulation of steps and more sustainable actions whose objectives would be directed toward more efficient, cleaner, safer and more reliable transport system. This will undoubtedly bring these ambitious goals of the EU common transport policy down to a technical level.
5.3.2 Model of trans-national policy cooperation along the main transport axes
Following the conclusions of the Ministerial Conference held on May 22nd, 2012 in Athens within the SEETAC -South East Europe Transport Axis- Project (to which SEETO is a Project Partner), according to which EU institutions are encouraged to consider the extension of the EU Core Network and the possibility to extend the
mandate of the Ten-T Coordinators through a Corridor approach to the Western Balkans, an innovative cross-border and transnational model should be introduced in managing transport axis crossing the region of Western Balkans.
On the basis of the Ministerial conclusions45 and the SEE Spatial Planning and Transport Operative Strategy(SPaTO)45 , as well as the expected results from the Regional Transport Study update and the border-crossing facilitation initiative to be developed through the established cooperation with CEFTA, both described in Chapter 5.1, the SEETO can develop the model of cross-border policy cooperation, whereby all measures to be undertaken for reducing travel times and transport costs are going to be pinpointed with accompanying investment plan for removal of physical and non-physical barriers on a particular transnational transport axis (corridor/route) selected from the SEETO Comprehensive Network that could go beyond the Western Balkans region.
This sort of ’flagship‘ project should address in holistic manner all bottlenecks and bilateral issues that hamper the smooth traffic flows across the border, not neglecting the ongoing implementation of Integrated Border Management and CEFTA Agreement, try to deliver some innovative solutions and to propose financial means for accomplishing the concrete objectives. It will use the transnational approach exercised in the SEETAC due to the large number of countries and actors involved in axis management. Having on board all stakeholders, they should potentially include a facilitator/European coordinator, who will drive politically the project closer to the national and international authorities to obtain their support and commitment along the implementation phase. Certainly, a multimodal corridor should be launched as a pilot project (e.g. Corridor X) which can bring impetus for further replication on the other axes too, if successful.
Since removal of bottlenecks and facilitation of transport along a corridor in general, is an extremely complex process that goes well beyond the mere transport sector, the project might focus at, although not limit to: interoperability, advanced information exchange systems and compliance with the procedures prescribed by the EU and international conventions for transport, as well as bilateral agreements. In addition, it should look at strengthening the surveillance and inspection functions of the state inspectorates of the Regional Participants, control bodies, licensing authorities and implementing border agencies along the corridor, given their capacity to equally apply and enforce homogeneous rules is crucial for an integrated market. Failure to do so, hinders the competition, increases the mistrust of the end-users vis-à-vis the operators and in general, hampers the possibility of the transport users and the economy to reap the full benefits of a seamless and uninterrupted multimodal transport.
It is expected that the project will have large added value to the infrastructure investments and in addition it will put high political weight to the process of regional transport planning. The involvement of the EU Member States authorities will also add to this exercise in terms of technical cooperation, transfer of know-how in management of corridor-approach projects according to the best practices from TEN-T Core Network projects and moreover, it will strengthen the political cooperation and build trust in the wider region.
42Council Directive 96/26/EC of 29.04. 1996 on admission to the occupation of road haulage operator and road passenger operator and mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications intended to facilitate for these operators the right to freedom of establishment in national and international transport operations, amended by Directive 98/76/EC43White Paper, Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area- Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system, Brussels, 28.03.2011 COM (2011) 144 final44The sector specific EU documents include, though are not limited to the following:• Greening Transport package- a strategy to introduce more efficient and greener road tolls for lorries and reducing noise pollution from rail freight• Keep Freight Moving- a strategy to promote freight transport logistics, deploy ERTMS along international freight-oriented “corridors and to modernise European ports• EU Maritime Strategy 2018- key areas for developing Motorways of the Sea• NAIADES Action Programme – a policy to promote inland waterway transport in Europe• Action Plan for deployment of ITS in Europe – programme for ITS deployment projects in road transport aiming to establish interconnections and interoperability45Available on www.seetac.eu
58
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Annex 1 - SEETO Comprehensive Network DescriptionSEETO Comprehensive Road NetworkCorridor V B (274 km): Slovenian border/ Rupa (Croatia) – Zagreb (Croatia) – Gorican (Croatia) /(Hungarian border)Corridor V C (541 km): Hungarian border/ Dubosevica (Croatia) – Osijek (Croatia) – Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) – Ploce (Croatia)Corridor VIII (657 km): Tirane/ Durres/ Vlore (Albania) – Skopje (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) – Deve Bair (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) / (Bulgarian border)Corridor X (1,031 km): Slovenian border / Bregana (Croatia) – Zagreb (Croatia) – Belgrade (Serbia) – Skopje (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) – Bogorodica (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) / (Greek border)Corridor X A (63 km): Slovenian border/ Donji Macelj (Croatia) – Zagreb (Croatia)Corridor X B (185 km): Hungarian border/ Horgos (Serbia) —Novi Belgrade (Serbia) Corridor X C (110 km): Nis (Serbia) —Gradina (Serbia )/(Bulgarian border) Corridor X D (117 km): Veles (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) —Medzitlija (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)/ (Greek border) Route 1 (712km): Bosiljevo 2 (Croatia) – Split (Croatia) – Ploce (Croatia) – Neum (Bosnia and Herzegovina) – Dubrovnik (Croatia) – Bar (Montenegro)Route 2 A (239 km): Okucani (Croatia) – Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina) – Lasva (Bosnia and Herzegovina)Route 2 B (395 km): Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) – Podgorica (Montenegro) – Vore (Albania)Route 2 C (125 km): Fier (Albania) —Kakavija (Albania)/(Greek border)Route 3 (185 km): Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) —Uzice (Serbia)Route 4 (601 km): Vatin (Romanian border) – Belgrade (Serbia) – Podgorica (Montenegro) – Bar (Montenegro)Route 5 (213 km): Cacak (Serbia) – Krusevac (Serbia) – Paracin (Serbia) – Vrska Cuka (Serbia)/ (Bulgarian border)Route 6 A (259 km): Ribarevina (Montenegro) – Ribarice (Serbia) – Pristina (Kosovo) – Skopje (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)Route 6 B (205 km): Pristina (Kosovo) –Peje/Pec (Kosovo) – Skopje (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)Route 7 (314 km): Lezhe (Albania) – Pristina (Kosovo)– Doljevac (Serbia)Route 8 (78 km): Podmolje (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) – Bitola (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)Route 9 (43 km): Vukovar (Croatia) –Zupanja (Croatia)Route 10 (183 km): Pula (Croatia) – Rijeka (Croatia) – Zuta Lokva (Croatia)
Figure A1- 1: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network
59
SEETO Comprehensive Rail NetworkCorridor V B (338 km): Slovenian border/ Sapjane (Croatia) – Zagreb (Croatia) – Botovo (Croatia)/ (Hungarian border)
Corridor V C (554 km): Hungarian border/ Beli Manastir (Croatia) – Osijek (Croatia) – Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) – Ploce (Croatia)
Corridor VIII (426 km): Tirana/ Durres/ Vlore (Albania) – Lin/Pogradec (Albania)-Kicevo (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) – Skopje – Kumanovo (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) – Beljakovci (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)/ Bulgarian border
Corridor X (1,177 km): Slovenian border/ Savski Marof (Croatia) – Zagreb (Croatia) – Belgrade (Serbia) – Skopje (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) – Gevgelija (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) / (Greek border)
Corridor X B (151 km): Hungarian border / Kelebija (Serbia) – Stara Pazova (Serbia)
Corridor X C (104 km): Nis (Serbia) – Dimitrovgrad (Serbia) / (Bulgarian border)
Corridor X D (145 km): Veles (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) – Kremenica (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) / (Greek border)
Route 1 (442 km): Ostarije (Croatia) — Split (Croatia)
Route 2 (144 km): Podgorica (Montenegro) — Vlore (Albania)
Route 4 (580 km): Vrsac (Romanian border) — Belgrade (Serbia) — Bar (Montenegro)
Route 9 A (224 km): Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina) – Doboj (Bosnia and Herzegovina) – Tuzla (Bosnia and Herzegovina) – Brcko (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
Route 9 B (18 km): Vinkovci (Croatia) – Vukovar (Croatia)
Route 10 (256 km): Kraljevo (Serbia) — Pristina (Kosovo) — Gorce Petrov (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)
Route 11 (138 km): Pozega (Serbia) — Stalac (Serbia).
Route 12 (51 km): Slovenian border/ Cakovec (Croatia) – Kotoriba (Croatia) /(Hungarian border)
Route 13 (28 km): Hungarian border / Horgos (Serbia) – Subotica (Serbia)
Figure A1- 2: SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network
60
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
SEETO Comprehensive Network AirportsRegional Participant Airport
Albania Tirane (TIA/LATI)
Bosnia and Herzegovina Banja Luka (BNX/LQBK)
Bosnia and Herzegovina Sarajevo (SJJ/LQSA)
Croatia Zagreb (ZAG/LDZA)
Croatia Split (SPU/LDSP)
Croatia Dubrovnik (DBV/LDDU)
Croatia Pula (PUY/LDPL)
Croatia Rijeka (RJK/LDRI)
Croatia Zadar (ZAD/LDZD)
Croatia Osijek (OSI/LDOS)
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Skopje (SKP/LWSK)
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Ohrid (LWOH/OHD)
Montenegro Podgorica (TGD/LYPG)
Montenegro Tivat (LYTV/TIV)
Serbia Belgrade (BEG/LYBE)
Serbia Nis (INI/LYNI)
Kosovo Pristina (PRN/LYPR))
SEETO Comprehensive Network SeaportsRegional Participant Seaport
Albania Durres
Albania Vlore
Croatia Rijeka
Croatia Split
Croatia Ploce
Croatia Dubrovnik
Croatia Sibenik
Croatia Zadar
Croatia Pula
Montenegro Bar
SEETO Comprehensive Network IWW portsRegional Participant IWW Port
Bosnia and Herzegovina Brcko
Bosnia and Herzegovina Samac
Croatia Sisak
Croatia Slavonski Brod
Croatia Vukovar
Croatia Osijek
Serbia Belgrade
Serbia Novi Sad
61
SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway NetworkCorridor VII Danube Inland Waterway Length (km)
Croatia/Serbia Batina/Bezdan – Ilok/Backa Palanka 137.5
Serbia Backa Palanka – Ram/Nera river 220.5
Serbia /Romania Ram/ Nera river – Timok river/Pristol 230.0
Total: 588.0
Sava River Inland Waterway Length (km)
Croatia/Serbia/ Bosnia and Herzegovina Belgrade – Sisak 593
Total: 593
Tisa River Inland Waterway Length (km)
Serbia Hungarian border – Danube river 164
Total: 164
Drava River Inland Waterway Length (km)
Croatia Osijek (Nemetin) – Ajmas 14
Total: 14
Figure A1- 3: SEETO Comprehensive Network Airports, Seaports, IWW and IWW Ports
62
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Ann
ex 2
- Fi
ches
for P
riorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
Road
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ngRo
ad C
orrid
or V
c Pr
iorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Com
plet
ion
of m
otor
way
on
Road
Cor
rido
r Vc,
Sec
tion
Vuko
savl
je-K
arus
e (5
0 km
)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
Vc
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 35
6
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Bosn
ia a
nd H
erze
govi
na
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyM
otor
way
in th
e Co
rrid
or V
c - F
easib
ility
Stu
dy
Prep
ared
by
IPSA
Inst
itute
, Sar
ajev
oCi
vil E
ngin
eerin
g In
stitu
te o
f Cro
atia
, Zag
reb
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt a
nd C
omm
unic
atio
ns, B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Savi
ngs i
n ve
hicl
es o
pera
tion
cost
s; sa
ving
s in
trav
el ti
me
of p
asse
nger
s; sa
ving
s in
acci
dent
s cos
ts, a
nd S
avin
gs in
infra
stru
c-tu
re m
aint
enan
ce c
osts
.
Ass
umed
val
ues o
f tim
e fo
r th
e di
ffere
nt u
ser g
roup
sBu
sines
s rel
ated
trip
s: 5,
58€/
h (1
0,91
BAM
/h)
Non
-bus
ines
s rel
ated
trip
s: 0,
981€
/h (1
,92
BAM
/h)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r5,
8%-3
,2%
(yea
r200
4-20
42) n
etw
ork
with
inve
stm
ents
5,7%
-3,1
% (y
ear2
004-
2042
) with
out i
nves
tmen
ts
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
Proj
ect a
ims a
t enh
anci
ng th
e ec
onom
ic a
nd so
cial
dev
elop
men
t of B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na th
roug
h sa
tisfy
ing
the
incr
easin
g de
man
d fo
r loc
al tr
ansp
ort,
and
the
prom
otio
n of
regi
onal
trad
e w
ith N
orth
Eas
t Eur
ope.
EI
RR 1
3.19
%N
PV 1
.626
.789
.366
,00€
(disc
ount
rate
8%
)N
PV
787.
924.
335,
00€
(disc
ount
rate
10%
)N
PV
236.
533.
742,
00€
(disc
ount
rate
12%
)Fo
reca
sted
pax
vol
ume
•Yea
r 204
7: 2
6.00
0 ve
hicl
es p
er y
ear
Fore
cast
ed c
argo
vol
ume
•Yea
r 204
7: 1
1.00
0 tr
ucks
per
yea
r D
istan
ce sa
ving
s: 25
kmTi
me
savi
ngs:
120
min
Ope
ratin
g co
st sa
ving
s: 4
mill
ion
€ Ac
cide
nt c
ost s
avin
gs:
11.2
81 €
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Expe
cted
ben
efits
incl
ude
savi
ngs i
n tra
vel t
ime
and
in v
ehic
le o
pera
tion
cost
s for
all
type
s of v
ehic
les;
bette
r roa
d sa
fety
and
de-
crea
sed
envi
ronm
enta
l im
pact
s. D
ispla
cem
ent o
f tra
ffic
from
the
dens
e po
pula
ted
urba
n zo
nes a
long
the
exist
ing
mai
n ro
ad M
17/M
5.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4
Act
ion
DD
DD
DD
DD
Act
ion
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
63
Ann
ex 2
- Fi
ches
for P
riorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
Road
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ngRo
ad C
orrid
or V
c Pr
iorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Com
plet
ion
of m
otor
way
on
Road
Cor
rido
r Vc,
Sec
tion
Vuko
savl
je-K
arus
e (5
0 km
)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
Vc
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 35
6
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Bosn
ia a
nd H
erze
govi
na
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyM
otor
way
in th
e Co
rrid
or V
c - F
easib
ility
Stu
dy
Prep
ared
by
IPSA
Inst
itute
, Sar
ajev
oCi
vil E
ngin
eerin
g In
stitu
te o
f Cro
atia
, Zag
reb
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt a
nd C
omm
unic
atio
ns, B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Savi
ngs i
n ve
hicl
es o
pera
tion
cost
s; sa
ving
s in
trav
el ti
me
of p
asse
nger
s; sa
ving
s in
acci
dent
s cos
ts, a
nd S
avin
gs in
infra
stru
c-tu
re m
aint
enan
ce c
osts
.
Ass
umed
val
ues o
f tim
e fo
r th
e di
ffere
nt u
ser g
roup
sBu
sines
s rel
ated
trip
s: 5,
58€/
h (1
0,91
BAM
/h)
Non
-bus
ines
s rel
ated
trip
s: 0,
981€
/h (1
,92
BAM
/h)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r5,
8%-3
,2%
(yea
r200
4-20
42) n
etw
ork
with
inve
stm
ents
5,7%
-3,1
% (y
ear2
004-
2042
) with
out i
nves
tmen
ts
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
Proj
ect a
ims a
t enh
anci
ng th
e ec
onom
ic a
nd so
cial
dev
elop
men
t of B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na th
roug
h sa
tisfy
ing
the
incr
easin
g de
man
d fo
r loc
al tr
ansp
ort,
and
the
prom
otio
n of
regi
onal
trad
e w
ith N
orth
Eas
t Eur
ope.
EI
RR 1
3.19
%N
PV 1
.626
.789
.366
,00€
(disc
ount
rate
8%
)N
PV
787.
924.
335,
00€
(disc
ount
rate
10%
)N
PV
236.
533.
742,
00€
(disc
ount
rate
12%
)Fo
reca
sted
pax
vol
ume
•Yea
r 204
7: 2
6.00
0 ve
hicl
es p
er y
ear
Fore
cast
ed c
argo
vol
ume
•Yea
r 204
7: 1
1.00
0 tr
ucks
per
yea
r D
istan
ce sa
ving
s: 25
kmTi
me
savi
ngs:
120
min
Ope
ratin
g co
st sa
ving
s: 4
mill
ion
€ Ac
cide
nt c
ost s
avin
gs:
11.2
81 €
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Expe
cted
ben
efits
incl
ude
savi
ngs i
n tra
vel t
ime
and
in v
ehic
le o
pera
tion
cost
s for
all
type
s of v
ehic
les;
bette
r roa
d sa
fety
and
de-
crea
sed
envi
ronm
enta
l im
pact
s. D
ispla
cem
ent o
f tra
ffic
from
the
dens
e po
pula
ted
urba
n zo
nes a
long
the
exist
ing
mai
n ro
ad M
17/M
5.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4
Act
ion
DD
DD
DD
DD
Act
ion
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Com
plet
ion
of m
otor
way
on
Road
Cor
rido
r Vc,
Sec
tion
Karu
se-B
anlo
zi (5
0 km
)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
Vc
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 88
9
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Bosn
ia a
nd H
erze
govi
na
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyM
otor
way
in th
e Co
rrid
or V
c - F
easib
ility
Stu
dy
Prep
ared
by
IPSA
Inst
itute
, Sar
ajev
oCi
vil E
ngin
eerin
g In
stitu
te o
f Cro
atia
, Zag
reb
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt a
nd C
omm
unic
atio
ns, B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Savi
ngs i
n ve
hicl
es o
pera
tion
cost
s; sa
ving
s in
trav
el ti
me
of p
asse
nger
s; sa
ving
s in
acci
dent
s cos
ts, a
ndSa
ving
s in
infra
stru
ctur
e m
aint
enan
ce c
osts
.
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Busin
ess r
elat
ed tr
ips:
5,58
€/h
(10,
91 B
AM/h
)N
on-b
usin
ess r
elat
ed tr
ips:
0,98
1€/h
(1,9
2 BA
M/h
)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r5,
8%-3
,2%
(yea
r200
4-20
42) n
etw
ork
with
inve
stm
ents
5,7%
-3,1
% (y
ear2
004-
2042
) with
out i
nves
tmen
ts
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
Proj
ect a
ims a
t enh
anci
ng th
e ec
onom
ic a
nd so
cial
dev
elop
men
t of B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na th
roug
h sa
tisfy
ing
the
incr
easin
g de
man
d fo
r loc
al tr
ansp
ort,
and
the
prom
otio
n of
regi
onal
trad
e w
ith N
orth
Eas
t Eur
ope.
EI
RR 1
3.19
%N
PV 1
.626
.789
.366
,00€
(disc
ount
rate
8%
)N
PV
787.
924.
335,
00€
(disc
ount
rate
10%
)N
PV
236.
533.
742,
00€
(disc
ount
rate
12%
)
Fore
cast
ed p
ax v
olum
e •Y
ear 2
047:
26.
000
vehi
cles
per
yea
r Fo
reca
sted
car
go v
olum
e•Y
ear 2
047:
11.
000
truc
ks p
er y
ear
Dist
ance
savi
ngs:
25km
Tim
e sa
ving
s: 12
0 m
inO
pera
ting
cost
savi
ngs:
4 m
illio
n €
Acci
dent
cos
t sav
ings
: 11
.281
€
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Expe
cted
ben
efits
incl
ude
savi
ngs i
n tr
avel
tim
e an
d in
veh
icle
ope
ratio
n co
sts f
or a
ll ty
pes o
f veh
icle
s; be
tter
road
safe
ty a
nd d
e-cr
ease
d en
viro
nmen
tal i
mpa
cts.
Disp
lace
men
t of t
raffi
c fro
m th
e de
nse
popu
late
d ur
ban
zone
s alo
ng th
e ex
istin
g m
ain
road
M17
/M
5.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nD
DD
DD
DD
DA
ctio
nI
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
IFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
64
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Com
plet
ion
of m
otor
way
on
Road
Cor
rido
r Vc,
Mos
tar B
y-pa
ss (1
3 km
)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
Vc
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 36
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Bosn
ia a
nd H
erze
govi
na
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyM
otor
way
in th
e Co
rrid
or V
c-Fe
asib
ility
Stu
dy
Prep
ared
by
IPSA
Inst
itute
, Sar
ajev
oCi
vil E
ngin
eerin
g In
stitu
te o
f Cro
atia
, Zag
reb
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt a
nd C
omm
unic
atio
ns, B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
con
sid-
ered
Savi
ngs i
n ve
hicl
es o
pera
tion
cost
s; sa
ving
s in
trav
el ti
me
of p
asse
nger
s; sa
ving
s in
acci
dent
s cos
ts, a
ndSa
ving
s in
infra
stru
ctur
e m
aint
enan
ce c
osts
.
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for t
he d
if-fe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Busin
ess r
elat
ed tr
ips:
5,58
€/h
(10,
91 B
AM/h
)N
on-b
usin
ess r
elat
ed tr
ips:
0,98
1€/h
(1,9
2 BA
M/h
)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
per
yea
r5,
8%-3
,2%
(yea
r200
4-20
42) n
etw
ork
with
inve
stm
ents
5,7%
-3,1
% (y
ear2
004-
2042
) with
out i
nves
tmen
ts
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Mos
tar B
y-pa
ss p
roje
ct o
bjec
tives
are
elim
inat
ion
of b
ottle
neck
in u
rban
are
a M
osta
r, re
duct
ion
of tr
avel
tim
e an
d di
stan
ce fo
r peo
-pl
e an
d co
mm
oditi
es, r
educ
tion
of g
ener
alise
d tr
ansp
ort c
osts
for p
eopl
e an
d co
mm
oditi
es.
EIRR
13.
19%
NPV
1.6
26.7
89.3
66,0
0€ (d
iscou
nt ra
te 8
%)
NPV
78
7.92
4.33
5,00
€ (d
iscou
nt ra
te 1
0%)
NPV
23
6.53
3.74
2,00
€ (d
iscou
nt ra
te 1
2%)
Fore
cast
ed p
ax v
olum
e •Y
ear 2
047:
26.
000
vehi
cles
per
yea
r Fo
reca
sted
car
go v
olum
e•Y
ear 2
047:
11.
000
truck
s per
yea
r D
istan
ce sa
ving
s: 25
kmTi
me
savi
ngs:
120
min
Ope
ratin
g co
st sa
ving
s: 4
milli
on €
Ac
cide
nt c
ost s
avin
gs: 1
1.28
1 €
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Expe
cted
ben
efits
incl
ude
savi
ngs i
n tr
avel
tim
e an
d in
veh
icle
ope
ratio
n co
sts f
or a
ll ty
pes o
f veh
icle
s; be
tter
road
safe
ty a
nd d
e-cr
ease
d en
viro
nmen
tal i
mpa
cts.
Disp
lace
men
t of t
raffi
c fro
m th
e de
nse
popu
late
d ur
ban
zone
s alo
ng th
e ex
istin
g m
ain
road
M17
/M
5.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nD
DD
DD
DD
DA
ctio
nI
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
IFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
65
Road
Cor
ridor
VIII
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ng
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Upg
radi
ng o
f Quk
es -
Qaf
e Pl
loce
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
VIII
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 10
0
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Alb
ania
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy o
f Upg
radi
ng Q
ukes
- Q
afe
Pllo
ce ro
ad
Prep
ared
by
Min
istry
of T
rans
port
/ARA
Supe
rvis
ed b
y
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Redu
ces t
he d
istan
ce fr
om th
e ro
ad a
xis p
assin
g th
roug
h th
e bo
rder
cro
ssin
g po
int o
f Kap
shtic
a.
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for t
he d
iffer
ent u
ser
grou
ps
Wor
king
tim
e va
lue=
1.52
Eur
o/ho
ur; N
ot w
orki
ng ti
me
valu
e=0.
508E
uro/
hour
(AN
TP 2
)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Impr
ove
the
mov
emen
t of v
ehic
les a
nd th
e ro
ad sa
fety
on
this
sect
ion.
Lin
k Al
bani
a w
ith G
reec
e th
roug
h th
e bo
rder
cro
ssin
g po
int
of K
apsh
tica.
EI
RR: 1
7.4
NPV
/cos
t=7.
4 (A
NTP
2)
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Tim
e Sa
ving
, Ope
ratio
n Co
st S
avin
g, V
OC
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nA
ctio
nFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
66
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Road
Cor
ridor
X P
riorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Com
plet
ion
of B
elgr
ade
By-p
ass,
Sec
tor 6
: Str
azev
ica-
Buba
nj P
otok
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
X (r
oad)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 96
.5
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Serb
ia
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy fo
r Bel
grad
e Ci
ty R
oad
By-p
ass
Prep
ared
by
Serb
ian
Road
Dire
ctor
ate
appo
inte
d Sc
ott W
ilson
and
its s
ub-c
onsu
ltant
s, th
e H
ighw
ay In
stitu
te a
nd th
e Tr
ansp
orta
tion
Inst
itute
. The
stud
y, w
hich
incl
udes
eng
inee
ring,
env
ironm
enta
l and
eco
nom
ic st
udie
s, is
finan
ced
by th
e Eu
rope
an A
genc
y fo
r Rec
onst
ruct
ion
(EAR
).
Supe
rvis
ed b
yEu
rope
an A
genc
y fo
r Rec
onst
ruct
ion
(EAR
), M
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Bene
fits a
re la
rgel
y a
resu
lt of
trav
el ti
me
savi
ngs.
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
An e
cono
mic
eva
luat
ion
mod
el b
ased
on
norm
al c
ost b
enefi
t tec
hniq
ues w
as se
t up
usin
g hi
ghly
stru
ctur
ed sp
read
shee
ts.
The
proc
edur
es u
sed
are
cons
isten
t with
gui
delin
es se
t out
in re
leva
nt E
U d
ocum
enta
tion
incl
udin
g TI
NA.
The
eva
luat
ion
prod
uces
key
eco
nom
ic in
dica
tors
incl
udin
g ec
onom
ic in
tern
al ra
te o
f ret
urn
(EIR
R), n
et p
rese
nt v
alue
(NPV
) and
ben
efit
cost
ratio
(B/C
). It
also
inco
rpor
ates
a se
ries o
f sen
sitiv
ity te
sts.
Each
pro
ject
scen
ario
test
ed w
as b
ased
on
traffi
c vo
lum
es
outp
ut fr
om th
e tr
affic
mod
el fo
r the
yea
rs 2
003,
201
0, 2
015
and
2021
for t
he si
tuat
ions
with
out t
he p
roje
ct a
nd w
ith th
e pr
ojec
t. Be
nefit
cat
egor
ies i
nclu
ded
vehi
cle
oper
atin
g co
st (V
OC)
savi
ngs,
valu
e of
tim
e (V
OT)
savi
ngs a
nd a
ccid
ent c
ost
savi
ngs.
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
rTr
affic
fore
cast
s for
car
s, lig
ht g
oods
veh
icle
s and
hea
vy g
oods
veh
icle
s wer
e ba
sed
on fo
reca
sts o
f gro
wth
in G
DP
per
capi
ta, p
opul
atio
n an
d em
ploy
men
t, al
l diff
eren
tiate
d by
regi
on, a
nd a
ssum
ptio
ns re
latin
g to
ela
stic
ity o
f tra
nspo
rt d
eman
d,
truc
k fle
et st
ruct
ure
and
inte
rnat
iona
l tra
nsit
traffi
c. T
wo
scen
ario
s wer
e de
velo
ped,
one
refe
rred
to a
s an
’opt
imist
ic‘sc
enar
io
and
the
othe
r as a
’pes
simist
ic‘sc
enar
io. R
esul
ting
over
all t
raffi
c gr
owth
was
6.0
per
cent
per
yea
r in
the
optim
istic
scen
ario
an
d 4.
5 pe
rcen
t per
yea
r in
the
pess
imist
ic sc
enar
io.
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Traffi
c on
the
Corr
idor
X p
asse
s rig
ht th
roug
h th
e ce
ntre
of B
elgr
ade
and
it cr
eate
s pro
blem
s with
con
gest
ions
and
env
ironm
enta
l an
d ro
ad sa
fety
pro
blem
s. EI
RR: 1
4.4
OCK
: 10%
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
E K-
and
acc
iden
t cos
t sav
ings
.xp
ecte
d be
nefit
s are
sign
ifica
ntly
redu
ced
vehi
cle
trav
el ti
me
(inte
rnat
iona
l and
cro
ss B
elgr
ade
jour
neys
), be
tter
leve
l of s
ervi
ce
and
less
con
gest
ions
in B
elgr
ade
city
cen
tre.
It w
ill h
ave
a gr
eat s
ocia
l and
eco
nom
ic im
pact
on
the
wid
er B
elgr
ade
area
thro
ugh
impr
oved
acc
essib
ility
and
con
sider
ably
impr
ove
the
elem
ents
of r
oad
safe
ty. T
he b
y-pa
ss p
asse
s thr
ough
env
ironm
enta
lly se
nsi-
tive
area
whi
ch w
ell l
eads
to b
ette
r env
ironm
enta
l pro
tect
ion.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Dec
reas
ing
the
traffi
c ja
ms i
n th
e co
untr
y of
the
Belg
rade
, les
s em
issio
n in
the
air,
soil,
surfa
ce a
nd g
roun
d w
ither
, dec
reas
ing
noise
le
vels
in th
e ci
ty a
rea.
67
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
14Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4
Act
ion
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
68
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Road
Rou
te 1
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ng
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Road
con
nect
ion
to in
terc
hang
e Vu
cevi
ca o
n m
otor
way
A1
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 1
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 14
8.16
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Croa
tia
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
stud
y of
bui
ldin
g th
e Sp
lit a
gglo
mer
atio
n-ro
ad c
onec
tion
of D
8 to
inte
rcha
nge
Vuce
vica
on
mot
orw
ay A
1
Prep
ared
by
Inst
itut I
GH
d.d
., Zag
reb
Supe
rvis
ed b
yH
rvat
ske
cest
e (C
roat
ian
Road
s) d
.o.o
., Zag
reb
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Redu
ctio
n of
trav
el ti
me
Redu
ctio
n of
veh
icle
ope
ratin
g co
sts (
VOCs
)Re
sidua
l val
ue o
f inf
rast
ruct
ure
Savi
ngs o
n ye
arly
mai
nten
ance
and
low
er o
pera
ting
cost
s Re
duct
ion
of c
onge
stio
n on
the
exist
ing
road
net
wor
k
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Busin
ess t
rave
ller -
5,9
9 €/
hour
N
on b
usin
ess t
rave
ller -
1,8
4 €/
hour
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
rAs
sum
ed tr
affic
grow
th w
ill b
e 40
% in
nex
t 10
year
s afte
r com
plet
ion
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
prop
osed
Lin
k Ro
ad w
ill h
ave
thre
e fu
nctio
ns: c
onne
ctio
n be
twee
n th
e M
otor
way
A1
and
the
Hig
hway
D8
(futu
re E
xpre
ssw
ay)
to p
rovi
de fo
r a d
irect
link
with
the
Split
agg
lom
erat
ion;
shor
tcut
the
exist
ing
Link
Roa
d D
1 to
from
Dug
opol
je v
ia K
lis to
Spl
it of
ab
out 1
2 km
; dire
ct a
cces
s to
the
futu
re R
egio
nal W
aste
Man
agem
ent C
entr
e.
EIRR
: 18.
63%
NPV
: (5%
app
lied
disc
ount
rate
)=25
4,39
M€
Pass
enge
r Tra
ffic
Dem
and:
201
98 A
ADT
Carg
o Tr
affic
Dem
and
: 200
0 to
ns
Fore
cast
ed G
row
th o
f Pas
seng
er Tr
affic:
4.6%
Fore
cast
ed G
row
th o
f Car
go Tr
affic:
4.5%
Dist
ance
savi
ngs:
12km
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Rem
ovin
g tr
affic
from
urb
an a
reas
; hig
h le
vel o
f tra
ffic
serv
ice;
incr
ease
d sa
fety
of t
raffi
c flo
w.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4
Act
ion
F SF S
F S
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
69
Road
Rou
te 2
a Pr
iorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Expr
essw
ay :
Hun
gary
Bor
der-
Viro
vitic
a-O
kuca
ni-B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na b
orde
rSe
ctio
n: O
kuca
ni-b
orde
r BiH
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 2a
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 55
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Croa
tiaFE
ASI
BILI
TY
STU
DY
Title
of s
tudy
Feas
ibili
ty st
udy
of b
uild
ing
the
Expr
essw
ay: H
unga
ry B
orde
r-Viro
vitic
a-O
kuca
ni-B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na b
orde
r, Se
ctio
n:
Oku
cani
-bor
der B
iHPr
epar
ed b
yIn
stitu
te IG
H d
.d., Z
agre
bSu
perv
ised
by
Hrv
atsk
e ce
ste,
d.o.
o., Z
agre
bW
hich
ben
efits
hav
e be
en
cons
ider
edRe
duct
ion
of tr
avel
tim
e Lo
wer
ope
ratin
g co
sts
Redu
cing
the
acci
dent
s risk
Re
duct
ion
of c
onge
stio
n on
the
exist
ing
road
net
wor
kA
ssum
ed v
alue
s of
tim
e fo
r th
e di
ffere
nt u
ser g
roup
sBu
sines
s tra
vele
r - 6
,13
€/ho
ur
Non
bus
ines
s tra
velle
r - 1
,84
€/ho
ur
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
per
ye
arAs
sum
ed tr
affic
grow
th fo
r per
iod
2013
-201
4 am
ount
s 6%
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Cons
truc
tion
of th
e E
netw
ork
– Co
rrid
or V
c w
hich
will
faci
litat
e co
nnec
tion
to th
e Co
rrid
or X
. To
con
nect
cen
tral
and
eas
tern
par
t of t
he R
egio
nal P
artic
ipan
t with
the
road
net
wor
k an
d to
ena
ble
regi
onal
dev
elop
men
t by
impr
oved
acc
essib
ility
, to
incr
ease
the
road
safe
ty a
nd m
obili
ty.
Faci
litat
es c
onne
ctio
n to
the
neig
hbou
ring
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na
EIRR
: 9.2
0%N
PV:
(5%
app
lied
disc
ount
rate
)=44
,94
M€
Pass
enge
r Tra
ffic
Dem
and:
15.
000
AAD
TCa
rgo
Traffi
c D
eman
d : 1
3.26
0 to
ns
Fore
cast
ed G
row
th o
f Pas
seng
er Tr
affic:
5%Fo
reca
sted
Gro
wth
of C
argo
Traffi
c: 8%
Dist
ance
savi
ngs:
9km
Tim
e sa
ving
s: 2h
Proj
ect b
enefi
tsTh
e pr
ojec
t/ro
ad w
ill a
djus
t the
qua
lity
of re
gion
al tr
affic
to in
tern
atio
nal s
tand
ards
. Add
ition
al b
enefi
ts a
re v
isibl
e in
: rem
ovin
g tr
affic
from
urb
an a
reas
; hi
gh le
vel o
f tra
ffic
serv
ice;
incr
ease
d sa
fety
of t
raffi
c flo
w; m
ore
effec
tive
conn
ectio
n be
twee
n Cr
oatia
and
Bo
snia
and
Her
zego
vina
in tr
affic
and
econ
omic
sens
e.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
16Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4
Act
ion
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
70
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Road
Rou
te 2
b Pr
iorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Cons
truc
tion
of B
rod
na D
rini
(Foc
a) -
Hum
(Sce
pan
Polje
) (23
.35
km)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 2b
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 62
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Bosn
ia a
nd H
erze
govi
na
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyIm
prov
emen
t of t
he F
oca-
Hum
mai
n ro
ad-F
easib
ility
Stu
dy
Prep
ared
by
WYG
Inte
rnat
iona
l Ltd
, UK
Gro
up o
f Sub
con
sulta
nts -
IPSA
Inst
itute
, Sar
ajev
o, B
&H; P
roje
kt, a
.d.B
anja
Luk
a, B
&H; T
rans
port
atio
n En
gine
erin
g Fa
culty
, BU
, Se
rbia
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt a
nd C
omm
unic
atio
ns, B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
busin
ess r
elat
ed tr
ips:
for P
A 3,
78€/
h (7
,4 B
AM/h
), fo
r BU
S 3,
4€/h
(6,6
BAM
/h)
non-
busin
ess r
elat
ed tr
ips:
for P
A 1,
13€/
h (2
,2 B
AM/h
), fo
r BU
S 1,
01€/
h (2
,0 B
AM/h
)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r3.
6%-2
.4%
(ye
ar20
10-2
035)
for c
omm
erci
al v
ehic
les
3.9%
-1.2
% (
year
2010
-203
5) fo
r pas
seng
er c
ars
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
road
from
Bro
d na
Drin
i (Fo
ca) t
o H
um a
nd in
to M
onte
negr
o (S
cepa
n Po
lje-P
luzi
ne) p
rovi
des a
dire
ct c
onne
ctio
n be
twee
n Bo
snia
and
Her
zego
vina
and
Mon
tene
gro
and
is th
e sh
orte
st ro
ute
from
Alb
ania
via
Mon
tene
gro
and
Bosn
ia a
nd H
erze
govi
na to
Ce
ntra
l Eur
ope
via
Corr
idor
Vc.
The
mai
n tr
affic
prob
lem
s on
exist
ing
road
, due
to e
xist
ing
traffi
c flo
ws a
re: b
ottle
neck
s, lo
w ro
ad
safe
ty le
vel,
low
ave
rage
veh
icle
spee
ds, w
ith lo
wer
than
spee
d lim
its d
ue to
poo
r roa
d el
emen
ts a
nd c
ondi
tions
, inc
reas
ed V
ehic
le
Ope
ratin
g Co
st (V
OC)
and
trav
el ti
me
cost
for t
he p
asse
nger
s and
goo
ds d
ue to
ver
y lo
w sp
eeds
, env
ironm
enta
l end
ange
rmen
t ca
used
by
incr
ease
d po
llutio
n, e
spec
ially
em
issio
ns a
nd n
oise
.In
crea
se o
f the
loca
l eco
nom
y co
mpe
titiv
enes
s with
in th
e ro
ad g
ravi
ty a
rea
and
indi
rect
impa
ct o
n ge
nera
tion
of n
ew p
roje
cts a
nd
inve
stm
ents
in th
e ec
onom
y of
the
regi
on a
re fo
rese
en a
nd d
istan
ce fo
r peo
ple
and
com
mod
ities
, red
uctio
n of
gen
eral
ised
tran
s-po
rt c
osts
for p
eopl
e an
d co
mm
oditi
es.
EIRR
8.4
6% (s
cena
rio I –
opt
imist
ic)
EIRR
7.9
0% (s
cena
rio II
– m
ediu
m)
EIRR
7.5
1% (s
cena
rio III
– p
essim
istic
)
ENPV
scen
ario
I
10.4
69.3
74,0
0€
(d
iscou
nt ra
te 6
%)
1.
644.
835,
00€
(d
iscou
nt ra
te 8
%)
ENPV
scen
ario
II
7.9
33.3
53,0
0€
(d
iscou
nt ra
te 6
%)
-3
62.9
75,0
0€
(d
iscou
nt ra
te 8
%)
ENPV
scen
ario
III
6.28
7.58
5,00
€
(
disc
ount
rate
6%
)
-1.7
21.9
74,0
0€
(di
scou
nt ra
te 8
%)
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Mai
n be
nefit
s will
be
repr
esen
ted
thro
ugh
redu
ced
vehi
cle
oper
atin
g co
sts a
nd ti
me
savi
ngs o
n ne
w ro
ad, i
mpr
oved
safe
ty a
nd
high
er e
nviro
nmen
tal c
once
rns.
In a
dditi
on, r
educ
tion
of tr
avel
tim
e an
d di
stan
ce a
s wel
l as r
educ
tion
of g
ener
alise
d tr
ansp
ort
cost
s are
exp
ecte
d.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Dur
ing
the
expl
oita
tion
of th
e ro
ad, w
ith re
gard
to th
e m
oder
nisa
tion
of v
ehic
les i
n th
e fu
ture
and
sign
ifica
nt re
stric
tions
on
the
exha
ust g
ases
qua
lity,
redu
ctio
n of
pol
luta
nts i
n fu
nctio
n of
traffi
c vo
lum
es in
crea
se is
to b
e ex
pect
ed.
M
ain
nega
tive
envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts a
re e
xpec
ted
durin
g co
nstr
uctio
n. M
achi
ne w
orks
(noi
se, v
ibra
tions
, etc
.) an
d oc
cupa
tion
of
cert
ain
land
are
as w
ill c
erta
inly
but
not
sign
ifica
ntly
hav
e a
nega
tive
envi
ronm
enta
l im
pact
on
the
plan
ts a
nd w
ildlif
e al
ong
the
alig
nmen
t.Th
e Pr
elim
inar
y En
viro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t doc
umen
t sug
gest
ed a
ir pr
otec
tion,
wat
er p
rote
ctio
n, so
il pr
otec
tion,
noi
se a
nd
prot
ectio
n m
easu
res,
was
te m
anag
emen
t, an
d hu
man
hea
lth p
rote
ctin
g m
easu
res a
s wel
l as fl
ora
and
faun
a m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s.
71
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18
Qua
rter
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
Act
ion
F SF S
F SF S
F SFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
72
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Road
Rou
te 2
c Pr
iorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Cons
truc
tion
of C
entr
al E
ast C
orri
dor a
nd C
entr
al S
outh
Cor
rido
r (Be
rat t
o Te
pele
ne) (
44km
)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 2c
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 21
0
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Alb
ania
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyPr
e-Fe
asib
ility
stud
y fo
r the
Cen
tral
-Sou
th C
orrid
or
Prep
ared
by
Scot
Wils
on K
Pat
rick,
UK
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Tim
e Sa
ving
, Ope
ratio
n Co
st S
avin
g, M
aint
enan
ce c
ost s
avin
g, V
OC,
Mod
erat
e po
sitiv
e en
viro
nmen
tal e
ffect
s
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for t
he d
iffer
ent u
ser
grou
ps
Wor
king
tim
e va
lue=
1.52
Eur
o/ho
ur; N
ot w
orki
ng ti
me
valu
e=0.
508
Euro
/hou
r (AN
TP 2
)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r7%
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
tota
l len
gth
of th
e Ce
ntra
l Sou
th C
orrid
or is
abo
ut 1
80 k
m, o
ut o
f whi
ch a
bout
10
% re
late
s to
the
exist
ing
road
s req
uirin
g no
im
prov
emen
ts so
no
new
eco
logi
cal r
isks w
ill o
ccur
. U
pgra
ding
is p
lann
ed o
n 15
% o
f the
sect
ion
and
on 7
5% n
ew c
onst
ruct
ion
will
take
pla
ce.
EIRR
= 1
0.67
%
NPV
=13
8.04
(ml E
uro)
Fore
cast
ed T
raffi
c G
row
th R
ate:
7%
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Tim
e Sa
ving
, Ope
ratio
n Co
st S
avin
g, M
aint
enan
ce c
ost s
avin
g, V
OC.
Soc
ial e
cono
mic
dev
elop
men
ts o
f zon
es n
ear t
he ro
ad. S
hort
-in
g th
e tr
avel
dist
ance
from
Tira
na to
Sou
th o
f Alb
ania
.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Cultu
ral l
ands
cape
are
as a
re a
ffect
ed m
ost (
50%
), ec
olog
ical
risk
s ass
esse
d as
low
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SA
ctio
nFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
73
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
New
con
stru
ctio
n of
By-
pass
of R
rogo
zhin
a (4
.5km
)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
VIII
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 6.
4
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Alb
ania
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy fo
r By-
pass
of R
rogo
zhin
a
Prep
ared
by
MPW
T/AR
A
Supe
rvis
ed b
yAl
bani
an G
over
nmen
t
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Link
s the
Cor
ridor
VIII
and
Nor
th-S
outh
Cor
ridor
road
segm
ents
, red
uce
the
trav
el ti
me
and
dist
ance
s to
and
from
por
t of
Dur
res,
road
safe
ty g
row
th.
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for t
he d
iffer
ent u
ser
grou
ps
Wor
king
tim
e va
lue=
1.52
Eur
o/ho
ur; N
ot w
orki
ng ti
me
valu
e=0.
508
Euro
/hou
r (AN
TP 2
)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Rrog
ozhi
na b
ypas
s is t
arge
ting
traffi
c fa
cilit
atio
n in
Rro
gozh
ina
tow
n w
hile
in th
e fu
ture
it is
exp
ecte
d to
be
one
of th
e m
ost i
m-
port
ant k
nots
of F
ushe
-Kru
je-R
rogo
zhin
ë hi
ghw
ay, a
ver
y im
port
ant a
rter
y fo
r the
circ
ulat
ion
with
in th
e co
untr
y as
wel
l as r
egio
nal
conn
ectiv
ity.
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Impl
emen
tatio
n of
pro
ject
is c
onsid
ered
hig
hly
impo
rtan
t not
onl
y in
term
s of t
raffi
c, b
ut a
lso fo
r the
impr
ovem
ent o
f env
ironm
ent
and
road
safe
ty.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4
Act
ion
Act
ion
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
74
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Road
Rou
te 4
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ng
PRO
JECT
FIC
HE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Road
Rou
te 4
con
stru
ctio
n - S
ectio
n Po
dgor
ica-
Mat
esev
o
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 4
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 50
1.6
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Mon
tene
gro
FEA
SIBI
LITY
STU
DY
Title
of s
tudy
SEET
O R
oad
Rout
e 4
Inve
stm
ent P
lan
Prep
ared
by
URS
Env
ironm
enta
l and
Infra
stru
ctur
e U
K Li
mite
d (fo
rmer
SCO
TT –
WIL
SON
) (CO
NSO
RTIU
M: S
YTAS
S.A
. (G
reec
e), T
TA S
.A. (
Gre
ece)
and
OM
IKRO
N K
APPA
Con
sulti
ng S
.A. (
Gre
ece)
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt a
nd M
ariti
me
Affai
rs a
nd M
inist
ry o
f Fin
ance
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
con
sid-
ered
Follo
win
g pr
imar
y ec
onom
ic b
enefi
ts a
re c
onsid
ered
: sav
ings
in ro
ad v
ehic
le o
pera
ting
and
mai
nten
ance
co
sts;
valu
e of
tim
e sa
ving
s of p
asse
nger
s; va
lue
of to
ne /
hour
savi
ngs o
f fre
ight
; sav
ings
in ro
ad a
ccid
ent
cost
s; va
lue
of b
enefi
ts to
gen
erat
ed tr
affic.
In a
dditi
on, s
ome
seco
ndar
y ec
onom
ic b
enefi
ts a
re c
onsid
ered
. Th
e ex
tern
al c
osts
con
sider
ed in
clud
e: n
oise
cos
ts; p
ollu
tion
cost
s; cl
imat
e ch
ange
cos
ts
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for t
he d
if-fe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Vehi
cle
type
O
ccup
ancy
/load
ing
EU
R
E
UR
/ veh
icle
Car
2.1
4 pe
rson
s
1.
55 /
pers
on
3.3
3LC
V
3
.6 to
nnes
0.02
662
/ ton
ne
0.
096
HCV
12.
5 to
nnes
0
.026
62 /
tonn
e
0.3
33
VOTs
for f
utur
e ye
ars w
ere
incr
ease
d by
app
lyin
g th
e VO
T el
astic
ity to
fore
cast
gro
wth
in G
DP/
capi
ta.
Assu
med
gro
wth
in G
DP
with
an
elas
ticity
of 0
.7 a
pplie
d, is
show
n in
the
follo
win
g ta
ble.
VOT
grow
th fa
ctor
s 201
2 - 2
050
(per
cent
per
yea
r)Ye
ar
G
DP/
capi
ta
VO
T20
12 –
202
0
2.
0%
1
.4%
2021
- 20
35
2
.5%
1.7
5%20
36 -
2050
2.5
%
1
.75%
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
per
yea
r
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
EIRR
: 4.5
%N
PV:
4.5
(in E
UR
mill
ion)
Disc
ount
ed b
enefi
ts p
er k
m -
158,
61 (i
n EU
R m
illio
n)
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Key
gene
rato
rs o
f int
erna
tiona
l tra
ffic
in M
onte
negr
o ar
e Al
bani
a an
d Se
rbia
with
Alb
ania
dom
inat
ing
for c
ars.
For H
GVs
how
ever
, Se
rbia
is a
mai
n ge
nera
tor w
ith 4
0% o
f int
erna
tiona
l HG
V tr
affic
bein
g fro
m/t
o Se
rbia
. Whi
lst th
is re
pres
ents
a la
rge
perc
enta
ge o
f th
e H
GV
dem
and,
it in
fact
repr
esen
ts le
ss th
an 0
.6%
of t
he o
vera
ll in
ter-m
unic
ipal
mov
emen
ts fo
r all
vehi
cles
and
onl
y fe
w tr
ips i
n ab
solu
te te
rms (
369
trip
s). E
ven
thou
gh th
ese
HG
Vs w
ould
hig
hly
profi
t fro
m th
e im
prov
emen
ts to
the
SEET
O R
oute
4 C
orrid
or, t
he
‘eco
nom
ic b
enefi
ts’ li
nked
to th
ese
will
be
min
or w
ithin
the
wid
er e
cono
mic
con
text
.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Obj
ects
on
the
sect
ion
have
bee
n de
scrib
ed in
det
ail,
as w
ell a
s noi
se le
vels
and
emiss
ions
to a
ir du
ring
cons
truc
tion
wor
ks o
f br
idge
s, vi
aduc
ts a
nd tu
nnel
s. Al
l sub
-var
iant
s of t
he p
roje
ct h
ave
been
des
crib
ed in
det
ail a
s wel
l. Er
osio
n, la
ndsli
de a
nd se
ismol
-og
y ar
e al
so in
clud
ed in
the
Stud
y.
75
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nA
ctio
n
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
76
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Cons
truc
tion
of M
otor
way
sec
tion
Belg
rade
-Poz
ega
(133
.5 k
m)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 4
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 78
6
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Serb
ia
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy n
ew c
onst
rictio
n Be
lgra
de-S
outh
Adr
iatic
, Sec
tion
Belg
rade
-Poz
ega
Prep
ared
by
Hig
hway
Inst
itute
from
Bel
grad
e, 2
007,
Fin
ance
d fro
m P
E Ro
ads o
f Ser
bia
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Tra
nspo
rt
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
proj
ect a
ims a
t im
prov
ing
the
leve
l of s
ervi
ce a
nd tr
affic
safe
ty b
y up
grad
ing
the
exist
ing
road
to m
otor
way
stan
dard
and
co
nstr
uctio
n of
new
hig
hway
sect
ion
with
all
serv
ice
faci
litie
s. It
mea
ns th
at th
e ne
w ro
ute
will
take
ove
r the
role
of t
he a
dequ
ate
cate
goris
atio
n of
the
Euro
pean
net
wor
k. M
inist
ry o
f Inf
rast
ruct
ure
star
ted
with
fina
ncin
g ot
her R
oad
Rout
e 4
sect
ions
- U
b-La
jko-
vac
leng
th 1
2,5k
km, b
udge
t inv
estm
ent o
f 64
mil
Euro
s (w
ill b
e fin
ished
od
the
end
of th
e 20
12) a
nd th
e se
ctio
n Li
g-Pr
eljin
a le
ngth
40
,36k
m b
y in
vest
men
t cos
t of 3
08 m
il Eu
ros (
Aze
rbed
zan
Gov
ernm
ent c
ontr
act).
EIRR
: 10.
89O
CK: 8
%EN
PV/E
URO
: 279
.822
.384
,00
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Expe
cted
ben
efits
are
redu
ced
VOC,
trav
el ti
mes
and
acc
iden
t cos
t.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Envi
ronm
enta
l iss
ues r
evie
wed
in th
e re
port
are
: geo
logy
and
soils
, sur
face
and
gro
undw
ater
, air
qual
ity, n
oise
, flor
a an
d fa
una,
la
ndsc
ape
and
visu
al im
pact
, cul
tura
l her
itage
, pop
ulat
ion
and
econ
omy.
Env
ironm
enta
lly se
nsiti
ve a
reas
(gro
undw
ater
pro
tec-
tion
zone
; sur
face
dra
inag
e; re
siden
tial a
reas
; arc
haeo
logi
cal s
ites;
agric
ultu
ral l
and,
shru
b- a
nd w
oodl
and)
alo
ng th
e ro
ute
have
be
en id
entifi
ed. N
o bi
odiv
ersit
y ar
eas p
rote
cted
und
er n
atio
nal o
r int
erna
tiona
l leg
islat
ion
have
bee
n id
entifi
ed. T
he u
se o
f nat
ural
re
sour
ces –
wat
er re
sour
ces,
agric
ultu
ral l
and
and
fore
sts –
has
bee
n re
view
ed.
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
14Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4
Act
ion
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
Act
ion
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I AFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
77
Road
Rou
te 6
a Pr
iorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Cons
truc
tion
of m
otor
way
, Sec
tion
Pris
tina-
Han
i I E
lezi
t/D
jene
ral J
anko
vic
(56k
m)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 6a
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 37
8
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Koso
vo
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy a
nd E
nviro
nmen
tal A
sses
smen
t for
Tw
o M
ain
Road
Axe
s in
Koso
vo
Prep
ared
by
COW
I
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Inf
rast
ruct
ure
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r4
%
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
Rout
e 6a
con
nect
s the
Rou
te 4
and
the
Rout
e 7
with
the
Corr
idor
VIII
and
has
a v
ital r
ole
in e
cono
mic
and
soci
al d
evel
opm
ent
of K
osov
o. T
he o
bjec
tive
is to
bui
ld fu
ll m
otor
way
pro
file
from
Pris
tina
to b
orde
r with
the
form
er Y
ugos
lav
Repu
blic
of M
aced
onia
, im
prov
ing
the
leve
l of s
ervi
ce a
nd tr
affic
safe
ty a
s wel
l as e
nhan
cing
con
nect
ivity
of t
his r
egio
n.EI
RR:
12 %
NPV
: 10
2.58
Impo
rtan
ce o
f Int
erna
tiona
l Dem
and
- Pa
ssen
ger T
raffi
c: 2
0%Pa
ssen
ger T
raffi
c: 4
0%
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
The
bene
fits o
f the
pro
ject
will
resu
lt in
redu
ced
jour
ney
times
and
del
ays,
and
impr
oved
road
surfa
ce c
ondi
tions
whi
ch w
ill re
sult
in v
ehic
le o
pera
ting
cost
savi
ngs,
acci
dent
cos
t sav
ings
and
trav
el ti
me
cost
savi
ngs.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
14Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4
Act
ion
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
DD
DD
DD
DD
Act
ion
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
78
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Road
Rou
te 7
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ng
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Cons
truc
tion
of s
ectio
n Pr
istin
a-M
erda
re
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 7
(roa
d)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 75
0
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Koso
vo
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy a
nd E
nviro
nmen
tal A
sses
smen
t for
Tw
o M
ain
Road
Axe
s in
Koso
vo
Prep
ared
by
COW
I
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ry o
f Inf
rast
ruct
ure
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r4
%
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
Hig
hway
Mer
dare
- Pr
istin
a –
Kuke
s - D
urre
s (Ro
ute
- 7),
crea
tes t
he sh
orte
st c
onne
ctio
n be
twee
n Ko
sovo
and
Alb
ania
with
the
Euro
pean
net
wor
k of
inte
rnat
iona
l roa
ds. I
t is o
f a g
reat
eco
nom
ical
impo
rtan
ce if
look
ed a
t fro
m th
e as
pect
of t
he tr
ansp
orta
tion
of g
oods
and
pas
seng
ers w
ithin
SEE
Cou
ntrie
s as w
ell a
s the
ir sh
orte
st li
nk w
ith E
urop
ean
and
Med
iterr
anea
n co
untr
ies.
The
proj
ect s
uppo
rts t
he a
ctiv
atio
n of
nat
ural
and
hum
an re
sour
ces a
nd h
elps
surp
assin
g po
litic
al a
nd c
ivili
zatio
n pr
oble
ms,
offer
-in
g th
e ec
onom
ical
, pol
itica
l and
cul
tura
l coo
pera
tion
amon
gst R
egio
nal P
artic
ipan
ts.
EIRR
: 8.
25 %
NPV
: 33
9.85
Impo
rtan
ce o
f Int
erna
tiona
l Dem
and
- Pa
ssen
ger T
raffi
c: 2
0%Pa
ssen
ger T
raffi
c: 4
0%Pr
ojec
t ben
efits
The
mai
n ar
gum
ent o
r rea
soni
ng b
ehin
d Ro
ute
– 7
was
bas
ed e
xact
ly o
n ad
vant
ages
, suc
h as
: red
uctio
n of
trav
el ti
me
and
expe
n-di
ture
s as w
ell a
s mor
e se
cure
trav
el. T
his c
hang
e ca
used
the
disc
ontin
uatio
n of
the
trac
k of
Rou
te –
7, h
avin
g its
impa
ct o
n th
e eff
ectiv
e fu
nctio
n of
the
netw
ork
whe
n fu
lly c
ompl
eted
.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
14Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SD
DD
DD
DD
D
Act
ion
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
79
Road
Cor
ridor
X P
riorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
Reha
bilit
atio
n pr
ojec
t
PRO
JECT
FIC
HE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Reha
bilit
atio
n of
Roa
d se
ctio
ns o
n Ro
ad C
orri
dor X
, se
ctio
ns B
rezi
ca-M
iladi
novc
i and
Vel
es-B
rezi
ca
(57.
5 km
)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
X (r
oad)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 16
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
the
form
er Y
ugos
lav
Repu
blic
of M
aced
onia
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Corr
idor
X is
the
mos
t im
port
ant e
lem
ent o
f the
cor
e tr
ansp
ort n
etw
ork,
link
ing
from
Gre
ece
to A
ustr
ia. W
ithin
the
natio
nal t
er-
ritor
y, th
e re
leva
nt p
art o
f the
Cor
ridor
X is
in c
onco
rdan
ce w
ith N
atio
nal r
oad
M-1
(int
erna
tiona
l mar
k E-
75),
whi
ch c
ross
es th
e te
rrito
ry in
dire
ctio
n N
orth
-Sou
th. T
he st
rate
gica
l im
port
ance
of t
he C
orrid
or is
in th
e fa
ct th
at w
ill c
ontr
ibut
e fo
r a fa
ster
and
safe
r co
mm
on c
omm
unic
atio
n an
d tr
ansp
ort o
f pas
seng
ers a
nd g
oods
that
lead
s to
econ
omic
secu
rity
and
stab
ility
.
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
With
the
reha
bilit
atio
n of
the
prev
ious
ly m
entio
ned
sect
ions
the
capa
city
and
the
over
all e
ffica
cy o
f the
mot
orw
ay E
-75
nort
h-so
uth
will
be
impr
oved
, as w
ell a
s red
uctio
n of
the
noise
and
the
pollu
tion,
bet
ter c
ondi
tions
for t
he tr
ansit
tran
spor
t, su
ppor
t an
d st
imul
atio
n of
the
econ
omic
dev
elop
men
t. T
hese
sect
ions
hav
e th
e hi
ghes
t tra
ffic
on th
e Co
rrid
or X
in te
rrito
ry o
f the
form
er
Yugo
slav
Repu
blic
of M
aced
onia
and
thei
r im
port
ance
and
ben
efits
in sh
ort p
erio
d is
muc
h va
luab
le.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nD
DD
DFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
80
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Rail
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ngRa
il Co
rrid
or V
b Pr
iorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Upg
rade
and
con
stru
ctio
n of
sec
ond
trac
k on
railw
ay li
ne s
ectio
n D
ugo
Selo
-Kri
zevc
i (38
km
)Co
rrid
or/ R
oute
:Co
rrid
or V
b (r
ail)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 19
8.03
Fo
rese
en: 2
9.7
mil
€ N
atio
nal B
udge
t; 1
68.3
3 m
il €
Cohe
sion
Fun
dRe
gion
al P
artic
ipan
tCr
oatia
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy fo
r Dug
o Se
lo-K
rizev
ci ra
ilway
sect
ion
Prep
ared
by
Carlo
s Her
nand
ez U
rtia
ga; K
runo
slav
Peric
; Val
entin
a Sm
it-N
ovos
elec
Supe
rvis
ed b
yCo
nsor
tium
SAF
EGE-
PM-E
PTIS
A-RA
MBO
LL-R
AZBO
RW
hich
ben
efits
hav
e be
en
cons
ider
edSa
ving
s on
year
ly m
aint
enan
ce; R
even
ue fr
om a
dditi
onal
pas
seng
er a
nd fr
eigh
t tra
ffic;
The
resid
ual v
alue
of t
he in
vest
men
t; St
reng
then
the
Regi
onal
pat
icip
ants
infra
stru
ctur
al b
ase;
Red
uce
the
deve
lopm
ent i
mba
lanc
es, i
n pa
rtic
ular
pro
mot
ing
the
pros
pect
s for
sust
aina
ble
deve
lopm
ent o
f reg
ions
lagg
ing
behi
nd a
nd o
f bor
der a
reas
; ben
efits
from
the
trav
el ti
me
redu
c-tio
n as
a re
sult
of im
prov
ed ra
il se
rvic
e. O
pera
ting
bene
fits w
ere
also
gen
erat
ed b
y th
e tr
ansf
er o
f pas
seng
ers f
rom
car
to th
e ra
il tr
ansp
ort m
ode
as a
resu
lt of
low
er u
nit o
pera
ting
cost
of r
ail c
ompa
red
to c
ar tr
avel
.A
ssum
ed v
alue
s of
tim
e fo
r th
e di
ffere
nt u
ser g
roup
s€8
.09
per h
our;
€0.8
0eur
o/ho
ur/t
onne
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
per
ye
ar3.
61%
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
To e
limin
ate
the
obst
acle
s to
the
inte
rope
rabi
lity
of th
e ra
il sy
stem
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e D
irect
ive
2008
/57/
EC a
nd to
impr
ove
its
tech
nica
l sta
ndar
ds to
mee
t tho
se o
f a T
EN ra
ilway
cor
ridor
in li
ne w
ith E
U re
quire
men
t.To
brin
g th
e lin
e up
to th
e te
chni
cal s
tand
ards
est
ablis
hed
unde
r AG
C an
d AG
TC a
gree
men
ts a
nd o
pera
ting
para
met
ers a
llow
ing
for a
pas
seng
er tr
ain
spee
d up
to 1
60 k
m/h
, fre
ight
trai
ns u
p to
120
km/h
and
the
min
imum
sidi
ng le
ngth
to 7
50 m
.To
mod
erni
se si
gnal
ling
and
tele
com
mun
icat
ion
syst
ems i
n or
der t
o en
able
inst
alla
tion
of E
TCS
and
cent
ralis
ed tr
affic
cont
rol
equi
pmen
t and
to fa
cilit
ate
the
inte
grat
ion
of th
e Cr
oatia
n ra
ilway
net
wor
k w
ith in
tern
atio
nal a
nd E
U st
anda
rds.
To p
rovi
de b
ette
r acc
ess t
o ra
il se
rvic
es fo
r the
loca
l pop
ulat
ion.
EIRR
: 10.
91%
Inte
rnat
iona
l Pas
seng
er T
raffi
c D
eman
d: 9
%In
tern
atio
nal C
argo
Tra
ffic
Dem
and:
80%
Fore
cast
ed T
raffi
c G
row
th ra
te:
3.61
% (n
ext 5
yea
rs)
Tim
e sa
ving
s: 0.
13h
Proj
ect b
enefi
tsSa
ving
s on
year
ly m
aint
enan
ce in
com
paris
on w
ith th
e sit
uatio
n ’w
ithou
t pro
ject
‘; Rev
enue
from
add
ition
al p
asse
nger
and
frei
ght
traffi
c. T
he re
sidua
l val
ue o
f the
inve
stm
ent.
Stre
ngth
en th
e co
untr
y’s in
frast
ruct
ural
bas
e. R
educ
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t im
bala
nces
, in
par
ticul
ar p
rom
otin
g th
e pr
ospe
cts f
or su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t of r
egio
ns la
ggin
g be
hind
and
of b
orde
r are
as; d
ecen
tral
ise,
reor
gani
se te
rrito
rially
and
stre
ngth
en lo
cal a
utho
ritie
s. Th
e ec
onom
ic a
naly
sis sh
ows t
he b
enefi
ts fr
om th
e tr
avel
tim
e re
duct
ion
as
a re
sult
of im
prov
ed ra
il se
rvic
e. O
pera
ting
bene
fits w
ere
also
gen
erat
ed b
y th
e tr
ansf
er o
f pas
seng
ers f
rom
car
to th
e ra
il tr
ansp
ort
mod
e as
a re
sult
of lo
wer
uni
t ope
ratin
g co
st o
f rai
l com
pare
d to
car
trav
el. A
dditi
onal
ben
efits
wer
e ge
nera
ted
thro
ugh
redu
c-tio
n of
ext
erna
litie
s due
to lo
wer
uni
t cos
t of r
ail t
rans
port
com
pare
d to
car
tran
spor
t. Fr
eigh
t tra
nspo
rt a
lso e
xper
ienc
ed b
enefi
ts
thro
ugh
impr
oved
rail
serv
ice
and
trav
el ti
me
redu
ctio
n.En
viro
nmen
tal e
ffect
sTh
e ad
vant
ages
of r
ail t
rans
port
are
ass
ocia
ted
with
low
er e
miss
ion
leve
ls w
hen
com
pare
d to
oth
er m
odes
of t
rans
port
, the
ad-
vant
age
of ra
ilway
s is a
low
con
sum
ptio
n of
spac
e an
d ra
il tr
ansp
ort c
reat
es le
ss n
oise
than
road
or a
ir tr
affic.
For
the
sam
e fre
ight
vo
lum
es a
nd sa
me
pass
enge
r flow
s rai
l pro
duce
s 25
to 5
0% le
ss n
oise
. Rai
lway
s hav
e th
e sm
alle
st e
miss
ion
of h
arm
ful g
ases
; co
nsum
ptio
n of
ene
rgy
per t
rans
port
uni
t is s
mal
lest
on
railw
ays a
nd in
wat
er tr
ansp
ort.
Railw
ays o
ccup
y ca
thre
e tim
es le
ss la
nd
surfa
ce c
ompa
red
to ro
ads,
safe
ty o
f tra
nspo
rt is
gre
ater
, the
impa
ct o
f noi
se is
smal
ler,
etc.
Maj
or p
roje
ct a
pplic
atio
n fo
r the
Dug
o Se
lo-K
rizev
ci ra
ilway
sect
ion
Upg
rade
and
Con
stru
ctio
n of
Sec
ond
Trac
k w
as su
bmitt
ed to
EC
DG
Reg
io in
Feb
ruar
y, 20
11.
81
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
0520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SA
ctio
nD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DA
ctio
nI
II
II
II
II
II
IFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
82
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Rail
Corr
idor
VIII
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ng
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Cons
truc
tion
of n
ew ra
ilway
line
Kum
anov
o-Be
ljako
vce-
Kriv
a Pa
lank
a
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
VIII
(rai
l)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 59
1
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
The
form
er Y
ugos
lav
Repu
blic
of M
aced
onia
FEAS
IBIL
ITY
STU
DY
Title
of s
tudy
Feas
ibili
ty S
tudy
for C
orrid
or V
III E
aste
rn S
ectio
n an
d ES
IA
Prep
ared
by
Eptis
a in
ass
ocia
tion
with
DB
Mob
ility
Net
wor
ks L
ogist
ics
Supe
rvise
d by
Facu
lty fo
r Civ
il En
gine
erin
g - S
kopj
e, th
e fo
rmer
Yug
osla
v Re
publ
ic o
f Mac
edon
ia
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Trav
el ti
me
savi
ngs d
ue to
shift
from
road
to ra
il, Re
venu
e of
infra
stru
ctur
e ow
ner f
rom
ope
ratio
n of
the
proj
ect l
ine
be-
twee
n Ku
man
ovo
and
BG b
orde
r (Tr
ack
Acce
ss C
harg
es),
gove
rnm
ent’s
surp
lus a
nd lo
sses
, ben
efits
from
add
ition
al e
mpl
oy-
men
t dur
ing
the
railw
ay c
onst
ruct
ion
perio
d, b
enefi
ts fr
om a
dditi
onal
em
ploy
men
t due
to ra
ilway
ope
ratio
ns a
long
the
new
line
, ext
erna
litie
s
Assu
med
val
ues o
f tim
e fo
r th
e di
ffere
nt u
ser g
roup
sBu
sines
s EU
R 9.
50 p
er h
our,
Non
-bus
ines
s EU
R 3.
51 p
er h
our.
Assu
med
traffi
c gr
owth
per
ye
arAn
nual
Gro
wth
Rat
e in
the
next
five
yea
rs p
erio
d is
57.1
4% (y
ears
201
5-20
19)
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
The
proj
ect i
s foc
used
on
reha
bilit
atio
n of
railw
ay se
ctio
ns a
long
the
Corr
idor
VIII
: Ku
man
ovo-
Belja
kovc
e-Kr
iva
Pala
nka.
Con
stru
c-tio
n on
this
sect
ion
bega
n in
the
end
of 9
0’s b
ut w
as a
band
oned
due
to la
ck o
f fina
ncia
l res
ourc
es.
EIRR
: 11,
84 %
NPV
: 383
(in
EUR
milli
on)
Inte
rnat
iona
l Pas
seng
er Tr
affic
Dem
and:
56.
5% (2
019)
Inte
rnat
iona
l Car
go Tr
affic
Dem
and
: 86%
(201
9)
Fore
cast
ed G
row
th ra
te:
57.1
4% (2
015-
2019
)
Cut o
pera
tion
and
mai
nten
ance
cos
t: 73
7 82
6 Eu
ros
Tim
e sa
ving
s: •S
kopj
e - K
uman
ovo
- Bej
lako
vce:
Year
201
5 - 1
1,93
5 ho
urs
•Sko
pje
-Kum
anov
o - B
G b
orde
r:
Year
201
9 - 5
2,43
6 ho
urs
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
The
new
railw
ay li
ne w
ill g
ener
ate
bene
fits f
or th
e us
ers (
cons
umer
’s su
rplu
s) in
pas
seng
er a
nd fr
eigh
t tra
ffic.
Use
r ben
efits
cou
ld b
e ge
nera
ted
in p
artic
ular
in te
rms o
f: sa
ving
s of u
ser c
osts
for m
odal
shift
ers i
n pa
ssen
ger t
raffi
c (ro
ad‐r
ail);
sa
ving
s of u
ser c
osts
for t
he sh
ift o
f fre
ight
tran
spor
t fro
m ro
ad to
rail;
savi
ngs o
f use
r cos
ts fo
r the
tran
sfer
of f
reig
ht tr
affic
from
ot
her r
ailw
ay ro
utes
to th
e pr
ojec
t lin
e du
e to
the
shor
teni
ng o
f tra
nspo
rt d
istan
ces;
savi
ngs o
f tra
vel t
ime
for p
asse
nger
s;sav
ings
of
tran
spor
t tim
e fo
r fre
ight
tran
spor
tatio
n.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Pote
ntia
l pos
itive
effe
cts o
f the
pro
ject
s fro
m th
e po
int o
f vie
w o
f env
ironm
enta
l im
pact
s, ev
en th
ough
ther
e w
ill b
e a
few
resid
ual
impa
cts w
hich
will
hav
e a
mod
erat
e ad
vers
e sig
nific
ance
dur
ing
the
cons
truc
tion
phas
e (d
estr
uctio
n of
top
soil
and
impa
irmen
t of
noise
qua
lity)
and
the
oper
atio
nal p
hase
(im
pairm
ent o
f lan
dsca
pe q
ualit
y, ha
bita
t fra
gmen
tatio
n an
d de
crea
se o
f ani
mal
pop
ula-
tions
), it
is co
nclu
ded
that
if th
e m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s tha
t hav
e be
en p
ropo
sed
in th
is ES
IA a
re im
plem
ente
d, th
e sig
nific
ance
of
the
over
all r
esid
ual i
mpa
ct o
f Pro
ject
Rai
lway
Cor
ridor
VIII
‐Eas
tern
Sec
tion
shou
ld b
e of
a sl
ight
adv
erse
nat
ure,
with
no
maj
or d
am-
ages
cau
sed
to th
e en
viro
nmen
tal r
esou
rces
pre
sent
alo
ng th
e ra
ilway
cor
ridor
83
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SA
ctio
nE I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I AI
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
IFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
84
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Cons
truc
tion
of n
ew ra
ilway
sec
tion
Kice
vo-b
orde
r with
Alb
ania
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Corr
idor
VIII
(rai
l)To
tal c
ost (
mill
ion
Euro
s):
470
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
The
form
er Y
ugos
lav
Repu
blic
of M
aced
onia
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyTe
chni
cal d
ocum
enta
tion
on st
udy
leve
l and
Pre
limin
ary
desig
n of
Rai
lway
line
for C
orrid
or V
III –
Kic
evo
– bo
r-de
r, Re
publ
ic o
f Alb
ania
Prep
ared
by
EURO
TRAN
SPRO
JEC
T LT
D S
ofia
1202
, 108
’Tza
r Sam
uil‘
str.
Supe
rvis
ed b
yFa
culty
for C
ivil
Engi
neer
ing
- Sko
pje,
the
form
er Y
ugos
lav
Repu
blic
of M
aced
onia
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
con
side
red
Bene
fits f
rom
tim
e sa
ving
s, Be
nefit
s fro
m re
duct
ion
of v
ehic
le o
pera
tion
cost
s, Be
nefit
s of r
educ
ed tr
affic
ac-
cide
nts,
Exte
rnal
ben
efits
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for t
he d
iffer
ent
user
gro
ups
Valu
e of
tim
e fo
r the
bas
e ye
ar in
the
form
er Y
ugos
lav
Repu
blic
of M
aced
onia
Valu
e of
tim
e fo
r bus
ines
s trip
s - lu
e of
tim
e fo
r bus
ines
s trip
sMac
edon
ia7.
34 (€
/pas
seng
er/h
our)
Valu
e of
tim
e fo
r oth
er tr
ips p
urpo
ses -
2.6
2 (€
/pas
seng
er/h
our)
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
per
yea
rAn
nual
Gro
wth
Rat
e in
the
next
five
yea
rs p
erio
d is
8.80
% fr
om y
ear 2
015-
2020
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Cons
truc
tion
of n
ew ra
ilway
sect
ion
Kice
vo –
bor
der w
ith A
lban
ia w
ith to
tal l
engt
h of
62.
6 km
. The
Pro
ject
is fu
lly in
com
plia
nce
and
cohe
renc
e w
ith N
atio
nal P
olic
y, re
flect
ed in
the
Nat
iona
l Tra
nspo
rt S
trat
egy
2007
-201
7 an
d w
ith th
e re
com
men
datio
ns o
f the
St
udy
’Inve
stm
ent O
ptio
ns in
the
Tran
spor
t Sec
tor‘
prep
ared
by
Loui
s Ber
ger i
n 20
02 (M
A971
0) fi
nanc
ed b
y PH
ARE
prog
ram
me.
EIRR
6.6
7 %
ENPV
7 5
98 1
86 €
Pass
enge
r Tra
ffic
Dem
and:
15.
000
AAD
TCa
rgo
Traffi
c D
eman
d : 1
3.26
0 to
ns
Fore
cast
ed G
row
th ra
te: 8
.8%
(nex
t 5 y
ears
)
Cut o
pera
tion
and
mai
nten
ance
cos
t: 73
7 82
6 Eu
ros
Tim
e sa
ving
s: 5
4861
hou
rs (
year
201
6)
Proj
ect b
enefi
tsIm
prov
ing
the
rail
infra
stru
ctur
e al
ong
the
East
-Wes
t Eur
ope
core
regi
onal
Net
wor
k by
est
ablis
hing
an
oper
atio
nal c
ontin
uity
of
Rail
Corr
idor
VIII
. The
com
plet
ion
of R
ail C
orrid
or V
III b
etw
een
the
form
er Y
ugos
lav
Repu
blic
of M
aced
onia
and
Alb
ania
will
ope
n ne
w o
ppor
tuni
ties f
or e
cono
mic
and
soci
al d
evel
opm
ent o
f the
regi
on.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
From
env
ironm
enta
l poi
nt o
f vie
w, t
he li
near
pro
ject
- co
nstr
uctio
n of
railw
ay li
ne K
icev
o-Li
n (b
orde
r with
the
Repu
blic
of A
lban
ia)
does
not
pos
e an
y pa
rtic
ular
thre
at to
env
ironm
ent a
nd n
atur
e an
d th
e ro
ute
is ac
cept
able
in it
s ent
irety
. If t
he p
ropo
sed
mea
sure
s fo
r pos
sible
env
ironm
enta
l im
pact
s red
uctio
n an
d m
itiga
tion
are
adop
ted,
it w
ill b
e su
stai
nabl
e in
long
-run
, bot
h fro
m fi
nanc
ial
and
envi
ronm
enta
l and
qua
lity
of li
ving
poi
nts o
f vie
w.
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SA
ctio
nE I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
II
II
II
II
II
II
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
85
Rail
Rout
e 10
Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ng
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Reha
bilit
atio
n of
Rai
l Rou
te 1
0 (F
ushe
Kos
ove/
Koso
vo P
olje
‐Han
i i E
lezi
t/ D
jene
ral J
anko
vic)
Corr
idor
/ Rou
te:
Rout
e 10
(rai
l)
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 14
1.85
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Koso
vo
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dySt
udy
for R
ehab
ilita
tion
of R
ail R
oute
10
(Les
hak‐
Fush
e Ko
sove
/Kos
ovo
Polje
‐Han
i i E
lezi
t/ D
jene
ral J
anko
vic)
(64
km)
Prep
ared
by
COW
I-IPF
Con
sort
ium
Supe
rvis
ed b
yKo
sovo
Rai
lway
s JSC
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Dev
elop
ing
this
proj
ect,
Koso
vo w
ill h
ave
an in
tero
pera
ble
railw
ay in
frast
ruct
ure
thro
ugh
whi
ch d
omes
tic a
nd re
gion
al ra
ilway
op
erat
ors w
ill o
pera
te.
EIRR
: 9.
17 %
Fore
cast
ed tr
affic
grow
th ra
te: 2
0%
Impo
rtan
ce o
f Int
erna
tiona
l Dem
and
- Pa
ssen
ger T
raffi
c: 5
0%Fr
eigh
t Tra
ffic:
90%
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
This
will
hel
p de
velo
pmen
t of t
he K
osov
o an
d re
gion
al e
cono
my
prov
idin
g to
all
inte
rest
ed p
artie
s saf
e, c
orre
ct a
nd n
ondi
scre
tion-
ary
serv
ices
.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
14Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SD
DD
D
Act
ion
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
II
II
II
II
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
86
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Inla
nd W
ater
way
Prio
rity
proj
ect e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
Rive
rpor
t Prio
rity
proj
ects
elig
ible
for f
undi
ng
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Reco
nstr
uctio
n an
d m
oder
nisa
tion
of R
iver
Por
t of B
rcko
Rive
r por
t:Br
cko
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 6.
5
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Bosn
ia a
nd H
erze
govi
na
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyRe
form
ing
of th
e m
anag
emen
t of t
he p
ort o
f Brc
ko
Prep
ared
by
MTB
S (M
ariti
me
and
Tarn
spor
t Bus
ines
s Sol
utio
ns),
The
Net
herla
nds
Supe
rvis
ed b
yAs
sem
bly
of B
rcko
Dist
rict o
f Bos
nia
and
Her
zego
vina
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Impr
ovem
ent o
f por
t effi
cien
cy a
nd o
pera
tiona
l per
form
ance
, enh
ance
men
t of t
he e
cono
mic
func
tion
of th
e po
rt, m
aint
ain
the
open
acc
ess f
unct
iona
lity
of th
e po
rt, d
edic
ated
to th
e m
ulti-
clie
nt p
urpo
se.
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
rEs
timat
ed p
ort t
hrou
ghpu
t gro
wth
: 150
,000
tons
for t
he 5
yea
rs p
erio
d
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
In o
rder
to im
prov
e ov
eral
l con
ditio
n of
Por
t of B
rcko
reha
bilit
atio
n of
por
t fac
ilitie
s, ha
ndlin
g eq
uipm
ent,
impr
ovem
ent o
f rai
lway
co
nnec
tion
and
stor
age
capa
citie
s are
requ
ired.
EI
RR: 1
2%
NPV
(KM
) in
2010
: 2,9
56,4
95Pr
ojec
t ben
efits
Port
Brc
ko c
ould
pla
y a
capi
tal r
ole
in p
rovi
ding
inte
rcon
nect
ivity
with
the
land
bas
ed tr
ansp
ort m
odes
(roa
d, ra
il) a
nd is
an
esse
n-tia
l tra
nsit
poin
t for
car
go tr
affic
flow
s to
and
from
the
heav
y in
dust
ries i
n Bo
snia
and
Her
zego
vina
. With
exp
ecte
d in
crea
se in
car
go
volu
me
afte
r Por
t of B
rcko
reha
bilit
atio
n, th
e Pr
ojec
t will
hav
e a
signi
fican
t pos
itive
influ
ence
on
regi
onal
eco
nom
ic g
row
th.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
No
envi
ronm
enta
l im
pact
ass
essm
ent h
as b
een
carr
ied
out.
It is
plan
ned
to c
arry
out
an
EIA
in th
e fu
ture
.
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
87
Rive
r Sav
a Pr
iorit
y pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r fun
ding
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Reha
bilit
atio
n an
d im
prov
emen
t of t
he S
ava
Rive
r wat
erw
ay
Inla
nd w
ater
way
:Sa
va
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 22
.6
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Bosn
ia a
nd H
erze
govi
na
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
stud
y an
d pr
ojec
t doc
umen
tatio
n fo
r the
reha
bilit
atio
n an
d de
velo
pmen
t of t
rans
port
and
nav
igat
ion
on th
e Sa
va ri
ver w
ater
way
Prep
ared
by
Paci
fic C
onsu
ltant
s Int
erna
tiona
l, Ja
pan
Supe
rvis
ed b
yIn
tern
atio
nal S
ava
Rive
r Bas
in C
omm
issio
n
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Dev
elop
men
t of t
he S
ava
Rive
r wat
erw
ay a
nd o
rgan
isatio
n of
an
appr
opria
te e
cono
mic
and
org
anisa
tiona
l fra
mew
ork
for
rest
orin
g tr
ade
and
navi
gatio
n (c
argo
and
pas
seng
ers)
on
the
Sava
Riv
er.
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
rIn
ave
rage
1 m
illio
n to
nnes
for t
he 5
yea
r-per
iod
for t
he w
hole
stre
tch
of th
e Sa
va R
iver
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
At th
is m
omen
t the
Sav
a Ri
ver d
oes n
ot m
eet t
he re
quire
d na
viga
tion
para
met
ers,
set b
y th
e Sa
va C
omm
issio
n, fo
r int
erna
tiona
l w
ater
way
Cla
ss IV
and
Cla
ss V
a, w
hich
wou
ld e
nsur
e m
inim
um d
epth
of 2
.5 m
for 3
00 d
ays p
er y
ear (
inte
rnat
iona
l wat
erw
ay c
lass
IV
), an
d m
inim
um d
epth
km
586
(Sisa
k). F
easib
ility
Stu
dy sh
owed
that
the
Sava
Riv
er o
ffers
val
uabl
e de
velo
pmen
t and
com
mer
-ci
alisa
tion
oppo
rtun
ities
.
Gro
win
g ex
pect
atio
ns re
gard
ing
the
pote
ntia
l of S
ava
Rive
r mot
ivat
es p
ublic
aut
horit
ies t
o re
habi
litat
e th
e riv
er, a
com
mitm
ent
mad
e ex
plic
it w
ith th
e ‘L
ette
r of I
nten
t con
cern
ing
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Sav
a Ri
ver B
asin
Com
miss
ion
Initi
ativ
e‘, k
now
n as
the
’Sav
a In
i-tia
tive‘,
sign
ed in
Sar
ajev
o on
29
Nov
embe
r 200
1 by
the
Min
ister
s of F
orei
gn A
ffairs
of R
epub
lic o
f Cro
atia
, the
Rep
ublic
of S
love
nia,
th
e Fe
dera
l Rep
ublic
of Y
ugos
lavi
a, a
nd b
y th
e M
inist
er fo
r Civ
il Aff
airs
and
Com
mun
icat
ions
of t
he R
epub
lic o
f Bos
nia
and
Her
ze-
govi
na. T
he fo
ur ri
paria
n co
untr
ies n
ext s
igne
d in
Kra
njsk
a G
ora
(Slo
veni
a) o
n 3
Dec
embe
r 200
2 th
e ’F
ram
ewor
k Ag
reem
ent o
n th
e Sa
va R
iver
Bas
in‘ (
FASR
B), b
y w
hich
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Sav
a Ri
ver B
asin
Com
miss
ion
(Sav
a Co
mm
issio
n) w
as fo
rmal
ly e
stab
lishe
d. T
he
FASR
B en
tere
d in
to fo
rce
on 2
9 D
ecem
ber 2
004
and
the
Cons
titut
iona
l Ses
sion
of th
e Sa
va C
omm
issio
n w
as h
eld
on 2
7-29
June
20
05 in
Zag
reb.
EIRR
(for
the
Va C
lass
of w
ater
way
, me-
dium
vol
ume
scen
ario
): 20
,2%
NPV
(for
the
Va C
lass
of w
ater
way
, me-
dium
vol
ume
scen
ario
): 15
7,9
mill
ion
Euro
s at 6
% d
iscou
nt ra
te
Prop
ortio
n of
inte
rnat
iona
l tra
ffic
≥10
%
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
The
mai
n be
nefit
will
be
upgr
ade
of S
ava
Rive
r Wat
erw
ay to
a m
inim
um n
avig
abili
ty C
lass
IV a
nd c
lass
Va,
by
ensu
ring
a m
inim
um
dept
h of
2.5
m. F
urth
erm
ore,
the
proj
ect i
nclu
des i
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
Riv
er In
form
atio
n Se
rvic
e-RI
S on
ove
rall
leng
th o
f Sav
a Ri
ver.
This
will
impr
ove
conn
ectiv
ity a
nd c
omm
unic
atio
n sy
stem
for t
he n
avig
atio
n, th
us im
prov
ing
safe
ty o
f inl
and
wat
erw
ays,
vess
els.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
An e
nviro
nmen
tal i
mpa
ct a
sses
smen
t has
bee
n ca
rrie
d ou
t for
the
sect
ion
Sisa
k-Ra
cino
vci a
nd is
in p
repa
ratio
n ph
ase
for B
rcko
-Be
lgra
de se
ctio
n. T
he F
easib
ility
stud
y ha
s ant
icip
ated
som
e en
viro
nmen
tal i
mpa
cts t
hat w
ill b
e fu
rthe
r ela
bora
ted
in th
e En
viro
n-m
enta
l and
Soc
ial I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t Stu
dy.
88
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F S
Act
ion
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
Act
ion
DD
DD
DI
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
IFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
89
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Reha
bilit
atio
n an
d im
prov
emen
t of t
he S
ava
Rive
r Wat
erw
ay (3
60 k
m)
Inla
nd w
ater
way
:Sa
va
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 55
Fo
rese
en: 1
3,75
Mil.
€ N
atio
nal b
udge
t; 41
,25
Mil.
€ E
U fu
nd
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Croa
tia
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy a
nd P
roje
ct D
ocum
enta
tion
for t
he R
ehab
ilita
tion
and
Dev
elop
men
t of T
rans
port
and
Nav
igat
ion
on th
e Sa
va R
iver
Wat
erw
ay
Prep
ared
by
Paci
fic C
onsu
ltant
s In
tern
atio
nal
Supe
rvis
ed b
yIn
tern
atio
nal S
ava
Rive
r Com
miss
ion
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Impr
ove
publ
ic a
nd p
rivat
e in
vest
men
ts in
to tr
ansp
ort o
n th
e Sa
va R
iver
, in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith a
dequ
ate
econ
omic
and
fina
n-ci
al a
naly
sis;
Obt
ain
an in
tegr
ated
app
roac
h co
nsid
erin
g w
ater
man
agem
ent,
ener
gy p
rodu
ctio
n, fl
ood
cont
rol a
nd e
nviro
nmen
tal
aspe
cts i
n th
e Sa
va R
iver
bas
in.
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
To re
habi
litat
e th
e Cr
oatia
’s pa
rt o
f Cor
ridor
VII
in o
rder
to a
chie
ve th
e re
quire
men
ts o
f the
inte
rnat
iona
l cla
ssifi
catio
n, c
ateg
ory
IV.
This
proj
ect w
ill c
over
the
area
of S
ava
Rive
r fro
m B
rcko
(rkm
234
) to
Sisa
k (rk
m 5
94).
Gro
win
g ex
pect
atio
ns re
gard
ing
the
pote
ntia
l of
Sav
a Ri
ver m
otiv
ates
pub
lic a
utho
ritie
s to
reha
bilit
ate
the
river
, a c
omm
itmen
t mad
e ex
plic
it w
ith th
e ‘L
ette
r of I
nten
t con
cern
-in
g th
e In
tern
atio
nal S
ava
Rive
r Bas
in C
omm
issio
n In
itiat
ive‘,
kno
wn
as th
e ’S
ava
Initi
ativ
e‘, si
gned
in S
araj
evo
on 2
9 N
ovem
ber 2
001
by th
e M
inist
ers o
f For
eign
Affa
irs o
f Rep
ublic
of C
roat
ia, t
he R
epub
lic o
f Slo
veni
a, th
e Fe
dera
l Rep
ublic
of Y
ugos
lavi
a, a
nd b
y th
e M
inist
er fo
r Civ
il Aff
airs
and
Com
mun
icat
ions
of t
he R
epub
lic o
f Bos
nia
and
Her
zego
vina
. The
four
ripa
rian
coun
trie
s nex
t sig
ned
in
Kran
jska
Gor
a (S
love
nia)
on
3 D
ecem
ber 2
002
the
’Fra
mew
ork
Agre
emen
t on
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
‘ (FA
SRB)
, by
whi
ch th
e In
tern
a-tio
nal S
ava
Rive
r Bas
in C
omm
issio
n (S
ava
Com
miss
ion)
was
form
ally
est
ablis
hed.
The
FAS
RB e
nter
ed in
to fo
rce
on 2
9 D
ecem
ber
2004
and
the
Cons
titut
iona
l Ses
sion
of th
e Sa
va C
omm
issio
n w
as h
eld
on 2
7-29
June
200
5 in
Zag
reb.
Rega
rdin
g th
e na
viga
tion
regi
me,
the
FASR
B st
ipul
ated
that
nav
igat
ion
on th
e Sa
va R
iver
is fr
ee fo
r tra
de v
esse
ls of
all
Stat
es a
nd
iden
tical
to th
e re
gula
tion
for t
he D
anub
e Ri
ver.
Trad
e ve
ssel
s hav
e a
right
to fr
ee e
ntra
nce
into
por
ts o
n th
e pa
rt o
f the
Sav
a Ri
ver
wat
erw
ay fr
om S
isak
to it
s est
uary
into
the
Dan
ube
Rive
r as w
ell a
s on
all n
avig
able
par
ts o
f the
Sav
a Ri
ver t
ribut
arie
s, an
d th
is fo
r pu
rpos
e of
load
ing,
disc
harg
ing,
supp
ly, a
nd si
mila
r act
ions
. Sig
nato
ry p
artie
s of t
he A
gree
men
t agr
eed
to u
nder
take
ther
efor
e al
l ne
cess
ary
mea
sure
s for
mai
nten
ance
of t
he w
ater
way
s in
thei
r ter
ritor
y to
gua
rant
ee a
nav
igab
le st
ate-
of-c
ondi
tion
as w
ell a
s to
unde
rtak
e m
easu
res o
n im
prov
emen
t of t
he n
avig
atio
n co
nditi
ons,
and
will
not
pre
vent
or c
ause
any
obs
tacl
es to
nav
igat
ion.
The
Pa
rtie
s also
agr
eed
to re
gula
te b
y a
sepa
rate
Pro
toco
l on
the
Regi
me
of N
avig
atio
n al
l iss
ues r
egar
ding
nav
igat
ion,
such
as i
nstit
u-tio
nal a
rran
gem
ents
(rul
es o
f nav
igat
ion,
tech
nica
l rul
es fo
r ves
sels,
mar
king
of n
avig
able
wat
erw
ays e
tc.)
and
expe
nses
rela
ting
to
the
mai
nten
ance
of t
he n
avig
able
wat
erw
ays a
nd th
e re
gim
e of
nav
igat
ion.
EIRR
hig
h vo
lum
e sc
enar
io: 2
6%
EIRR
med
ium
vol
ume
scen
ario
: 19%
EIRR
low
vol
ume
scen
ario
: 9%
90
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
Popu
latio
n in
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
is a
ppro
xim
ated
to 8
,176
,000
, whi
ch re
pres
ents
46%
of t
he to
tal p
opul
atio
n of
all
coun
trie
s (ex
-cl
udin
g AL
B an
d M
ON
). Pa
rtic
ular
ly, t
he p
opul
atio
n of
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
in C
RO 5
0%, i
n BI
H is
75%
of t
he to
tal p
opul
atio
n in
that
Re
gion
al P
artic
ipan
t. Ec
onom
ic a
ctiv
ities
dev
elop
ed in
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
, gen
erat
e m
ore
than
2,3
79,0
00 e
mpl
oyed
peo
ple.
Tha
t is
29%
of a
ll in
habi
tant
s in
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
and
45%
of a
ll em
ploy
ed p
eopl
e in
the
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ants
. As
for e
mpl
oym
ent,
the
indu
stry
and
oth
er a
ctiv
ities
sect
or (c
onst
ruct
ion,
who
lesa
le a
nd re
tail
trad
e, h
otel
s and
rest
aura
nts,
tran
spor
t, st
orag
e an
d co
mm
unic
atio
n, fi
nanc
ial i
nter
med
iatio
n, re
al e
stat
e, re
ntin
g an
d bu
sines
s act
iviti
es) r
emai
n th
e gr
eate
st
prod
ucer
s of j
obs.
31%
of a
ll em
ploy
ed p
eopl
e in
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
wor
k in
the
othe
r act
iviti
es se
ctor
, 27%
wor
k in
the
indu
stry
se
ctor
, 29%
wor
k in
the
publ
ic se
ctor
, 12%
wor
k in
the
agric
ultu
re a
nd 1
% w
ork
in th
e en
ergy
sect
or.
Shar
e of
the
gros
s dom
estic
pro
duct
(GD
P) in
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
reac
hes a
ver
y sig
nific
ant 5
3% o
f the
GD
P of
all
Regi
onal
Par
tici-
pant
s.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
As a
resu
lt, a
sign
ifica
nt m
odal
shift
effe
cts a
re e
xpec
ted
afte
r the
reha
bilit
atio
n/up
grad
e of
rive
r Sav
a. T
rans
port
s will
shift
from
road
to in
land
nav
igat
ion
in o
rder
to p
rofit
fro
m lo
wer
tran
spor
t cos
ts.
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
1620
1720
18Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SE I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I AA
ctio
nD
DD
DD
DD
DFS
= F
easib
ility
stud
y
EIA
= E
nviro
nmen
tal I
mpa
ct A
sses
smen
t D
= D
esig
n/Te
nder
pre
para
tion
C
= C
ontr
actin
g
I = Im
plem
enta
tion
R
= R
evie
w/E
valu
ate
91
PRO
JECT
FI
CHE
Proj
ect n
ame
(leng
th):
Reha
bilit
atio
n an
d im
prov
emen
t of S
ava
Rive
r fro
m B
elgr
ade
to B
osni
a an
d H
erze
govi
na b
orde
r (23
4km
)
Inla
nd w
ater
way
:Sa
va
Tota
l cos
t (m
illio
n Eu
ros)
: 30
Regi
onal
Par
ticip
ant
Serb
ia
FEA
SIBI
LITY
ST
UD
YTi
tle o
f stu
dyFe
asib
ility
Stu
dy a
nd P
roje
ct D
ocum
enta
tion
for t
he R
ehab
ilita
tion
and
Dev
elop
men
t of T
rans
port
and
Nav
igat
ion
on th
e Sa
va R
iver
Wat
erw
ay
Prep
ared
by
Inte
rnat
iona
l Sav
a Ri
ver B
asin
Com
miss
ion
– Fr
amew
ork
Agre
emen
t on
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
(200
4)
Supe
rvis
ed b
yM
inist
ries r
espo
nsib
le fo
r tra
nspo
rt in
ripa
rian
stat
es, S
teer
ing
Com
mitt
ee
Whi
ch b
enefi
ts h
ave
been
co
nsid
ered
Prov
ide
guid
elin
es fo
r Sav
a Co
mm
issio
n fo
r the
shor
t-te
rm, m
id-t
erm
, and
long
-ter
m p
olic
y fo
r the
dev
elop
men
t of t
he
Sava
Riv
er;
Impr
ovem
ent a
nd d
evel
opm
ent o
f tra
nspo
rt a
nd n
avig
atio
n on
the
Sava
rive
r wat
erw
ay (R
iver
bed
dred
ging
to p
rovi
de n
ec-
essa
ry d
ept,
reha
bilit
atio
n of
the
exist
ing
river
bank
con
stru
ctio
ns a
nd b
uild
ing
in n
ew ri
verb
ank
cons
truc
tions
, new
ban
k pr
otec
tions
, riv
erba
nd im
prov
emen
t.
Ass
umed
val
ues
of ti
me
for
the
diffe
rent
use
r gro
ups
Ass
umed
traffi
c gr
owth
pe
r yea
r
Ove
rall
proj
ect o
bjec
tive
Obj
ectiv
ely
veri
fiabl
e in
dica
tors
Mai
n ob
ject
ives
of t
he p
roje
ct a
re e
limin
atio
n of
nav
igat
ion
bott
lene
cks o
n cr
itica
l sec
tions
of t
he S
ava
Rive
r in
the
Repu
blic
of
Ser
bia.
It w
ill b
e do
ne b
y riv
er tr
aini
ng w
orks
and
dre
dgin
g ac
tiviti
es w
hich
will
pro
vide
nec
essa
ry d
ept,
reha
bilit
atio
n of
the
exist
ing
river
bank
con
stru
ctio
ns a
nd b
uild
ing
in n
ew ri
verb
ank
cons
truc
tions
, new
ban
k pr
otec
tions
, riv
erba
nd im
prov
emen
t, et
c.
Gro
win
g ex
pect
atio
ns re
gard
ing
the
pote
ntia
l of S
ava
Rive
r mot
ivat
es p
ublic
aut
horit
ies t
o re
habi
litat
e th
e riv
er, a
com
mitm
ent
mad
e ex
plic
it w
ith th
e ‘L
ette
r of I
nten
t con
cern
ing
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Sav
a Ri
ver B
asin
Com
miss
ion
Initi
ativ
e‘, k
now
n as
the
’Sav
a In
itiat
ive‘,
sign
ed in
Sar
ajev
o on
29
Nov
embe
r 200
1 by
the
Min
ister
s of F
orei
gn A
ffairs
of R
epub
lic o
f Cro
atia
, the
Rep
ublic
of
Slov
enia
, the
Fed
eral
Rep
ublic
of Y
ugos
lavi
a, a
nd b
y th
e M
inist
er fo
r Civ
il Aff
airs
and
Com
mun
icat
ions
of t
he R
epub
lic o
f Bos
nia
and
Her
zego
vina
. The
four
ripa
rian
coun
trie
s nex
t sig
ned
in K
ranj
ska
Gor
a (S
love
nia)
on
3 D
ecem
ber 2
002
the
’Fra
mew
ork
Agre
emen
t on
the
Sava
Riv
er B
asin
‘ (FA
SRB)
, by
whi
ch th
e In
tern
atio
nal S
ava
Rive
r Bas
in C
omm
issio
n (S
ava
Com
miss
ion)
was
fo
rmal
ly e
stab
lishe
d. T
he F
ASRB
ent
ered
into
forc
e on
29
Dec
embe
r 200
4 an
d th
e Co
nstit
utio
nal S
essio
n of
the
Sava
Com
miss
ion
was
hel
d on
27-
29 Ju
ne 2
005
in Z
agre
b.
EIRR
: 20%
Proj
ect b
enefi
ts
The
over
all r
esul
t will
be
upgr
ade
of S
ava
Rive
r Wat
erw
ay to
a m
inim
um n
avig
abili
ty C
lass
IV. T
he n
et p
rese
nt v
alue
of e
xter
nal
cost
s sav
ings
will
be
82.4
mill
ion
Euro
s for
the
high
vol
ume
scen
ario
, 54.
5 m
illio
n Eu
ros f
or th
e m
ediu
m v
olum
e sc
enar
io a
nd 2
9.4
mill
ion
Euro
s for
the
low
vol
ume
scen
ario
. The
inve
stm
ent w
ill p
rovi
de p
ositi
ve c
ash
flow
from
yea
r 201
9 an
d re
sult
in a
tota
l Net
Pr
esen
t Val
ue o
f 157
.9 m
illio
n Eu
ros o
ver t
he 2
0 ye
ar a
ppra
isal p
erio
d.
Envi
ronm
enta
l effe
cts
92
Tabl
e: P
lann
ed p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
char
tYe
ar20
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
1420
1520
16Q
uart
er1
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
41
23
4A
ctio
nF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SF S
F SD
DD
DD
DD
D
Act
ion
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
E I A
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
FS =
Fea
sibili
ty st
udy
E
IA =
Env
ironm
enta
l Im
pact
Ass
essm
ent
D =
Des
ign/
Tend
er p
repa
ratio
n
C =
Con
trac
ting
I =
Impl
emen
tatio
n
R =
Rev
iew
/Eva
luat
e
93
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Annex 3 - List of completed and finance secured/ongoing priority projectsMAP Transport
modeCorridor/ Route/Node
Regional participant
Name of the project Status Total cost M€
2007-2011 Road Corridor Vc BIH Completion of motorway, Section Kakanj-Vlakovo (Sarajevo by-pass)
Finished 195
2007-2011 Road Corridor X MAC Upgrading of road section Demir Kapija-Udovo-Smokvice
Ongoing 265
2007-2011 Road Corridor X SER Completion of Belgrade By-pass, Sector 1-3: Dobanovci-Ostruznica;
Finished 157
2007-2011 Road Corridor X SER Completion of Belgrade By-pass, Sector 4: Ostružnica-Orlovaca
Finished 61
2007-2011 Road Route 2b ALB Upgrading Hani Hotit-Shkoder road Ongoing 322007-2011 Rail Corridor X CRO Remote rail control traffic system Savski
Marof-Zagreb-TovarnikFinished 23
2007-2011 Seaport Ploce CRO Transport and Trade Integration (TTI), Port Ploce
Ongoing 141
2007-2011 Seaport Dubrovnik CRO Port of Dubrovnik: Construction of international passenger terminal
Finished 27
2008-2012 Road Corridor Vc BIH Reconstruction of Seslije-Samac section Finished 172008-2012 Road Route 7 ALB Upgrading Milot-Morine road Finished 9782009-2013 Road Corridor Vc BIH Completion of motorway on Vc Ongoing 6892009-2013 Road Corridor VIII ALB Construction of Rogozhine By-pass on
Corridor VIIIOngoing 8
2009-2013 Road Corridor VIII ALB Upgrading of Qafe Thane-Pogradec road Ongoing 182009-2013 Road Corridor X SER Completion of motorway Leskovac-Presevo Ongoing 721
2009-2013 Road Route 4 MNG Eastern mini by-pass Podgorica Finished 202009-2013 Seaport Durres ALB Rehabilitation of Port of Durres/ Ferry
Terminal Building and Yard in Port of DurresOngoing 40
2010-2014 Road Route 2c ALB Construction of Tepelene and Gjirokaster By-pass
Ongoing 44
2010-2014 Road Route 7 KOS Kosovo - Section of Route 7 Branch Morina-Merdare
Ongoing 660
2010-2014 Rail Corridor X CRO Okucani to Novska railway rehabilitation Ongoing 402010-2014 Rail Corridor X CRO Zagreb Main Station Signalling and
Interlocking SystemOngoing 12
2010-2014 Rail Corridor X MAC Rehabilitation of the rail line Tabanovci - Gevgelija (Corridor X) Sections: Veles-Zgropolci and Zgropolci-Demir Kapija
Ongoing 18
2010-2014 Airport Split CRO Split Airport: New aircraft platform i.e. apron
Finished 15
2010-2014 Airport Pristina KOS Rehabilitation of Pristina Airport Finished 162011-2015 Road Corridor X SER Completion of Belgrade By-pass, Sectors
5-6: Orlovaca-Bubanj PotokOngoing 120
2011-2015 Road Corridor X SER Completion of motorway Nis – border with Republic of Bulgaria
Ongoing 260
2011-2015 Rail Corridor X MAC Upgrading rail signalling and telecommunications along Corridor X
Ongoing 6
2011-2015 Rail Route 4 MNG Rehabilitation of Vrbnica–Podgorica-Bar railway line
Ongoing 14
2011-2015 Airport Belgrade SER Functional improvements of airside at Belgrade airport
Finished 27
2012-2016 Rail Corridor Xd MAC Railway rehabilitation, Section Bitola-Kremenica
Ongoing 9
94
Annex 4 - SEETO Comprehensive Road NetworkTable 4a: Traffic flows in the SEETO Comprehensive Road Network in 2011
Traffic range vehicle/day Total
Km %
< 999 141 2.16
1000 - 1999 183 2.8
2000 - 4999 2060.4 31.55
5000 - 9999 2281.7 34.94
10000 - 15000 1112.6 17.04
> 15000 752 11.51
Total: 6530.7 100
Table 4b: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network traffic indicators 2010 and 2011
Corridor or Route
2010 2011 Length
HGV traffic (%) AADT average HGV traffic (%) AADT average
Corridor Vb 27.64 15033.7 28.15 15725.0 274
Corridor Vc 43.79 3740.5 56.38 6254.1 541
Corridor VIII 79.56 8281.5 90.36 8533.5 657
Corridor X 158.71 13602.3 160.27 14040.1 1030
Corridor Xa 6.11 11498.0 5.95 11415.2 63
Corridor Xb 31.78 9390.0 28.65 10039.3 185
Corridor Xc 32.6 4393.0 23.88 5139.9 110
Corridor Xd 9.27 3697.0 9.84 3518.8 117
Route 1 48.17 8746.2 44.72 7832.9 713
Route 10 15.19 7004.7 16.71 6622.0 183
Route 2a 10.71 3506.6 24.04 4189.5 239
Route 2b 36.25 4379.4 29.59 3927.3 395
Route 2c 37.15 3231.5 37.99 3217.6 125
Route 3 5.16 548.1 6.69 2114.8 185
Route 4 103.69 8088.2 57.76 5825.5 601
Route 5 43.87 5417.0 26.8 5460.2 211
Route 6a 20.25 8613.2 17.82 5074.3 259
Route 6b 16.62 8069.7 10.64 7882.4 205
Route 7 27.52 3672.4 26.16 3820.8 314
Route 8 3.52 3523.1 3.81 3584.9 78
Route 9b 3.9 7204.5 4.18 7036.8 43
95
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Table 4c: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network Poor and Very Poor sections (2011)
SEETO Comprehensive Network element Length (km) Very poor (km) Poor (km)
Corridor Vc 9 9
Corridor VIII 39 39
Route 2b 47 47 46
Route 2c 71 71
Route 3 85 85
Route 4 22 22
Route 6a 49 49
Route 6b 70 33 37
Route 7 61 61
Table 4d: SEETO Comprehensive Road Network bottlenecks (2011)
SEETO_Code Level of service Length (km)
Corridor Vb D 4
Corridor Vc F 51
Corridor Vc D 21
Corridor VIII F 39
Corridor X F 46
Corridor X E 7
Corridor X D 28
Route 1 F 8
Route 1 D 78.5
Route 2a F 33
Route 2b D 42
R2b.13 F 54
R4.06 F 44
R4.07 E 25
R4.09 D 53
R4.10 F 37
R5.07 D 31
R5.08 F 5.5
R6a F 35
R6b.01 F 12
R7.09 D 25
R7.11 F 17
R8.01 D 7
96
Annex 5 - SEETO Comprehensive Rail NetworkTable 5a: The SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network passenger traffic (2009-2011)
Corridor or Route Passenger traffic volume (mil pkm) Index 2011/2010
2009 2010 2011
Corridor Vb 262.153 245.636 176.859 0.72
Corridor Vc 118.2 117.72 53.002 0.45
Corridor VIII 41.528 33.683 34.067 1.01
Corridor X 1689.822 1555.683 1352.455 0.87
Corridor Xb 86.11 81.954 71.123 0.87
Corridor Xc 1.305 1.374 1.315 0.96
Corridor Xd 35.514 60.966 61.92 1.02
Route 1 75.26 70.518 38.599 0.55
Route 10 60.908 61.134 53.117 0.87
Route 11 2.729 6.198 5.517 0.89
Route 12 20.966 19.645 14.144 0.72
Route 13 - - 0.855 -
Route 2 18.342 9.02 10.958 1.22
Route 4 191.254 213.335 111.383 0.52
Route 9a 20.09 14.371 37.521 2.61
Route 9b 0.678 0.635 0.457 0.72
Total: 2624.859 2491.872 2023.292 0.81
Table 5b: The SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network freight traffic (2009-2011)
Corridor or Route Freight traffic volume (million tkm) Index 2011/2010
2009 2010 2011
Corridor Vb 1003.512 657.222 717.723 1.09
Corridor Vc 1197.162 1155.88 886.697 0.77
Corridor VIII 21.54 34.309 81.032 2.36
Corridor X 3038.898 2933.731 3092.79 1.05
Corridor Xb 497.809 583.92 648.289 1.11
Corridor Xc 212.475 218.383 264.114 1.21
Corridor Xd 2.335 1.156 1.332 1.15
Route 1 493.139 414.36 290.777 0.70
Route 10 136.36 208.01 109.475 0.52
Route 11 47.603 52.492 50.793 0.97
Route 12 27.402 29.836 24.549 0.82
Route 2 29.094 43.59 31.794 0.73
Route 4 485.605 687.107 697.986 1.01
Route 9a 411.554 421.325 410.194 0.97
Route 9b 4.29 2.532 3.49 1.38
Total: 7608.778 7443.853 7311.04 0.98
97
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Table 5c: List of the SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network bottlenecks in 2011(single track)
Description Start node End node Length (km)
Number of tracks
Passenger trains (number)
Freight trains (number)
Total trains (number)
Corridor X Dugo Selo Novska 84 1 46 21 67
Corridor X Stara Pazova Novi Beograd 30 1 42 23 65
Corridor X Beograd Novi Beograd 5 1 42 23 65
Corridor X Beograd Resnik 76 1 42 23 65
Table 5d: List of the SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network bottlenecks in 2011(double tracks)
Description Start node End node Length (km)
Number of tracks
Passenger trains (number)
Freight trains (number)
Total trains (number)
Corridor X Savski Marof Zapresic 12 2 136 72 208
Corridor X Zapresic Zagreb 15 2 136 27 163
Corridor X Zagreb Dugo Selo 33 2 171 37 208
Table 5e: SEETO Comprehensive Rail Network maintenance expenditures (2011)
Regional Participant Total cost (M€)
Infrastructure cost (M€)
Signalling and telecommunication system (M€)
Electrification system(M€)
Cost per kilometre (€)
Albania 2.57 2.52 0.05 0 5397.37
Bosnia and Herzegovina 21.34 14.24 2.1 5 32730.06
Croatia 67.7 31.9 16.5 19.3 47609
the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
4.8 3.4 0.5 0.9 7717.04
Serbia 0.04 0.02 0.01 0 24.68
Kosovo 0.8 0.46 0.34 - 5311.61
Total: 97.25 52.54 19.5 25.2 -*Data missing for Montenegro
98
Annex 6 - SEETO Comprehensive Network AirportsTable 6a: SEETO Comprehensive Network Airports infrastructure data (2011)SEETO CN Airport
IATA level Number of runways
Main runway length (m)
Number of passenger terminals
Passenger terminal area (m2)
Apron area (m2)
Tirana Level 2 1 2750 1 - -Banja Luka Level 1 1 2400 1 500 21600Sarajevo Level 2 1 2600 1 778 700Dubrovnik Level 1 1 3300 1 24138 126000Osijek Level 1 1 2500 1 1500 27000Pula Level 1 1 2946 1 12500 64200Rijeka Level 1 1 2500 1 1000 33600Split Level 2 1 2550 1 10800 88000Zadar Level 1 2 2500 2 7000 46000Zagreb Level 1 1 3252 1 15000 168000Ohrid Level 1 1 2548 1 3000 38700Skopje Level 2 1 2950 1 40000 74000Podgorica Level 1 1 2500 1 5500 33220Tivat Level 2 1 2500 1 4050 46212Belgrade Level 1 1 3400 2 40000 163349Nis Level 1 1 2500 1 2000 27500Pristina Level 2 1 2501 2 6390 51220
Table 6b: SEETO Comprehensive Network airports performance data (2009 - 2011)
Airport Passengers Cargo (t) Passengers Cargo (t) Passengers Cargo (t)
2009 2010 2011
Tirana 1253682 1687 1536840 1944 1817073 2290
Banja Luka 25000 - 4798 - 8367 -
Sarajevo 533900 - 563266 1620 599978 1607
Dubrovnik 1122355 516 1270062 406 1350000 420
Osijek 20438 188 20827 - 22104 -
Pula 318838 13 332399 9 358320 9
Rijeka 113567 - 61855 - 84713 -
Split 1115099 750 1219737 600 1300381 600
Zadar 215839 33 260030 14 284980 19
Zagreb 2062242 11231 2071561 9386 2319098 9450
Ohrid 36652 8 44392 1 74345 4472
Skopje 599519 2414 681080 2379 759928 2610
Podgorica 450508 1460 651608 2138 611651 1052
Tivat 532148 23 541836 22 647184 22
Belgrade 2384077 6690 2698730 7427 3124633 8025
Nis 17159 390 23654 1555 25130 705
Pristina 1191978 1564 1305532 1383 1422302 1168
Total: 11993001 26967 13288207 28884 14810187 32449
99
SEETO Comprehensive Network Development Plan 2013
Annex 7 - SEETO Comprehensive Inland Waterway NetworkTable 7a: SEETO Comprehensive Network river ports cargo volume (2011)
Regional Participant River port River Total turnover (t) Passengers
Bosnia and Herzegovina Brcko Sava 36177 150
Bosnia and Herzegovina Samac Sava 151000 0
Croatia Sisak Sava 83000 1877
Serbia Beograd Danube 261185 57817
Serbia Novi Sad Danube 608400 11429
Total: 1139762 71273 *Data missing for ports Slavonski Brod, Vukovar, Osijek.
100
Annex 8 - SEETO Comprehensive Network SeaportsTable 8a: Seaports infrastructure data (2011)
Seaport Min draught (m)
Max draught (m)
Apron area (ha)
Condition Container terminal
Ro-Ro facilities
Transshipment center
Durres 7 12 1467000 Good Yes Yes Yes
Vlore 4 8 53025 Medium No No No
Pula 5 7 6890000 Medium Yes Yes Yes
Zadar 3 12 1470793 Medium Yes Yes Yes
Sibenik 5 10 171000 Good No Yes Yes
Rijeka 6 28 2000000 Good Yes Yes Yes
Split 4 11 130000 Good --- --- ---
Dubrovnik 4 11 130000 Good No Yes No
Ploce 2 10 81679 Good Yes Yes Yes
Bar 5 14 2000000 Good Yes No No
Table 8b: SEETO Comprehensive Network seaports traffic performance data (2009 - 2011)
Seaport Freight (million tons) Passengers (thousands)
2009 2010 2011 2009 2010 2011
Durres 2.37 3.41 3.48 876.03 834.04 853.75
Vlore 0.62 0.41 0.26 175.17 165.23 190.23
Pula 0.43 0.71 0.57 33.14 39.06 56
Zadar 0.47 0.61 0.33 2408.57 2435.93 2410.69
Sibenik 0.45 0.64 0 0.33 0.32 0.31
Rijeka 11.24 10.18 9.39 203.95 186.76 178.96
Split 2.47 2.99 2.55 3955.85 4109.88 4085.53
Dubrovnik 0 0 0 1082 1136.53 1660.54
Ploce 2.87 4.53 2.55 142.56 164.1 188
Bar 1.44 - 1.65 73.44 - 60.14
Total: 22.36 23.48 20.78 8951.04 9071.85 9684.15