Sediment Transport Studies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Sediment Transport Studies

    1/2

    Computational Modeling of Sediment Transport Processes

    Task Committee of Computational Modeling of SedimentTransport Processes

    Introduction

    With the rapid development of mathematical methodologies and

    the advances of computational facilities, sophisticated simulation

    tools using highly efficient and user-friendly computers have be-

    come easily accessible to engineers and scientists. Computational

    models to study river morphodynamic processes require the simu-

    lation of flow hydrodynamics, mass transport, deposition and ero-

    sion of sediment, and the advance and retreat of banks. The gov-

    erning equations solved in the models are the Reynolds-averaged

    momentum equations and the continuity equation for the hydro-

    dynamic flow field, the advection equation for mass transport, and

    Exners equation, together with empirical sediment transport for-mulas for bed change. Numerical techniques vary from the simple

    1D finite-difference method to the complex 2D and 3D finite-

    element or finite-volume schemes. Computational models have

    advantages over traditional physical models by being reusable,

    cost-effective, user-friendly with built-in pre- and post-

    processors, and easily applicable to various proposed design sce-

    narios. However, their accuracy is largely limited by mathemati-

    cal formulation, computational programming, numerical schemes,

    and our knowledge of flow and sediment transport. Therefore,

    validation and verification of sediment transport models are es-

    sential for engineers to choose appropriate models for the desired

    accuracy of engineering applications. The ASCE Task Committee

    TC

    on Computational Modeling of Sediment Transport Pro-

    cesses solicits the aid of engineers and scientists in assembling

    laboratory and field data sets suitable for the verification and vali-

    dation of sediment transport models. The Task Committee also

    plans to conduct a state-of-the-art review of sediment transport

    models by evaluating governing equations, numerical schemes,

    specific techniques of computing sediment transport, treatments

    of the bed material mixing layer, and methods in calculating bank

    advance/retreat. The focus of this TC is on the numerical schemes

    and algorithms for modeling sediment transport with 1D and

    depth-averaged 2D models.

    Research Summary

    Laboratory experiments have been conducted in various flumesettings to study sediment transport mechanics. These experi-

    ments are categorized as follows:

    1. Experiments in straight channels with nonerodible banks to

    study the fundamental mechanics of sediment transport such

    as sediment transport rate, bed forms, the resistance of mo-

    bile bed, sorting of nonuniform sediments, and deposition/

    erosion of sediments, etc.

    2. Experiments in curved or meandering channels with noner-

    odible banks to study flow hydrodynamics as well as the

    initiation and evolution of point or alternative bars and

    pools.

    3. Experiments in sand basins with initially straight or curved

    channels of mobile bed and banks to study the migration of

    meandering channels resulting from bank erosion.4. Experiments involving local scour associated with hydraulic

    structures to study the complex hydrodynamic flow field

    around hydraulic structures such as spur dikes, abutments,

    bendway weirs, and bridge piers, etc.

    5. Experiments in nondistorted or distorted scaled physical

    models to study sediment transport and bed degradation and

    aggradation in natural rivers, reservoirs, coastal areas or es-

    tuaries, etc., which are primarily designed for practical engi-

    neering projects.

    Sediment transport models should be verified for being ca-

    pable of replicating the results of laboratory experiments in

    straight, curved, or meandering channels with erodible or noner-

    odible banks. The measurements of flow and sediment transportin scaled physical models were obtained in a well-controlled labo-

    ratory environment and have better accuracy for model verifica-

    tions than data from the field prototype. The data sets mentioned

    previously are extremely valuable for testing the accuracy and

    feasibility of the developed sediment transport models, and any

    contributions of the original data sets will be highly appreciated.

    Computational modeling of sediment transport processes

    should include the modeling of bed load and suspended load, the

    interaction between bed and suspended sediments, the change of

    bed elevation, the update of surface and subsurface material gra-

    dation, and the advance/retreat of banks. The transport rate of bed

    load and suspended load often was calculated by empirical sedi-

    ment transport relations based on laboratory flume experiments ofequilibrium sediment transport. Nonequilibrium sediment model-

    ing of both suspended- and bed-load transport is often needed in

    sediment transport simulation of degrading or aggrading chan-

    nels. The interaction between suspended sediment and bed-load

    sediment requires the division of the bed material layer into mul-

    tiple strata. Bed elevation change was obtained traditionally by

    solving the sediment continuity equation. The gradations of bed

    surface and subsurface material were calculated by treating sedi-

    ment as a mixture and using fractional bed load and suspended-

    load transport equations. The simulation of bank retreat/advance

    can be accomplished by using a separate bank erosion model to

    account for basal erosion and bank failure. However, methods

    such as the quantification of the adaptation length or recoveringcoefficient for nonequilibrium sediment transport methods and the

    division of the mixing layer, etc., remain as debatable questions

    among sediment modelers. Whether or not computational models

    can achieve the accuracy equivalent to scaled physical models,

    whether or not only a complex 3D model is feasible to simulate

    river morphodynamic processes, and what accuracy we can ex-

    pect from computational sediment transport models, etc., are chal-

    lenging questions for both model developers and users. However,

    this committee will start with a focus on collecting data sets for

    sediment model verification and prepare a state-of-the-art review

    of 2D sediment transport models. Literature review will be based

    FORUM

    JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING ASCE / JULY 2004 / 597

    J. Hydraul. Eng. 2004.130:597-598.

  • 7/30/2019 Sediment Transport Studies

    2/2

    on publicly available documentation e.g., user manuals and tech-nical manuals of available commercial models and other models

    published in papers.

    Committee Activity

    The Task Committee first met during the 2003 Water Resources

    Conference in Philadelphia on June 21, 2003. To enable state-of-

    the-art research, the immediate tasks of this TC are to sponsor two

    sessions at the 2004 ASCE-EWRI Conference in Salt Lake Cityand a panel discussion at the 2005 ASCE-EWRI Conference. The

    first session will be devoted to Data sets for Verification and

    Validation of Sediment Transport Models. This session will

    gather papers of laboratory and field experimental data sets of

    sediment transport processes. Laboratory experiments conducted

    in recirculating straight flumes, sine-generated meandering chan-

    nels, and scaled physical models will be welcome. Field measure-

    ments on natural alluvial channels, river meandering reaches, res-

    ervoirs, and around river-training structures are also expected.

    Other data sets that reflect the effect of bank erosion to sediment

    transport processes will be included. These data sets will poten-

    tially be used as the data sets for verifications and validations of

    sediment transport models. The second session will examine

    Numerical Modeling of Sediment Transport Processes. Thissession will consist of papers presenting sediment transport mod-

    els developed in academic institutions, federal agencies, and the

    private sector. Applications of commercially available sediment

    transport models for solving engineering problems are sought.

    This session aims to foster exchanges of information and experi-

    ence regarding recent advances in modeling sediment transport

    and its applications to engineering projects. The title of the pro-

    posed panel discussion is The Future of Sediment Transport

    Models and will combine invited papers with a short discussion.

    The invited papers will synthesize the state-of-the-art in simulat-

    ing sedimentation processes in watersheds, alluvial channels, and

    modified natural channels. Panelists representing academic insti-

    tutions, federal R&D agencies, and private entities will be invited

    by the TC and approved by the Computational Hydraulics Tech-

    nical Committee of the Hydraulics and Waterway Council.

    The objective of this forum is to call for your participation in

    the technical activities of this TC, to obtain submissions of papers

    to sessions and panel discussions, and to get your recommenda-

    tions. We would also highly appreciate your efforts if you would

    like to contribute experimental, field, or other pertinent data sets

    to share with colleagues.

    We hope to receive your critiques and recommendations. You

    may send your comments to [email protected]; they will be for-

    warded to all committee members. If you would like to reach an

    individual committee member, our contact information is as fol-

    lows:

    Brian D. Barkdoll, PhD, P.E., Associate Professor, Environ-

    mental and Water Resources Engineering, Michigan Technologi-

    cal Univ., Houghton, Mich. E-mail: [email protected]

    Jennifer G. Duan, PhD, P.E., Chair of TC, Assistant Research

    Professor, Desert Research Institute, Univ. and Community Col-

    lege System of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nev. E-mail: [email protected]

    Shou-shan Fan, PhD, Adjunct Research Professor, Dept. of

    Civil Engineering, Clarkson Univ., Potsdam, N.Y. E-mail:

    [email protected]

    Cassie C. Klumpp, P.E., Hydraulic Engineer, Sedimentation

    and River Hydraulics Group D8540, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation,

    Denver Service Center, Denver. E-mail: [email protected]

    Bill McAnnally, PhD, P.E., Research Professor, Dept. of Civil

    and Environmental Engineering, Mississippi State Univ., Miss.

    E-mail: [email protected]

    Thanos Papanicolaou, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil

    and Environmental Engineering, the Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City,

    Iowa. E-mail: [email protected]

    Steve Scott, PhD, P.E., Research Hydraulic Engineer, Coastal

    and Hydraulics Laboratory, Waterways Experiment Station,

    Engineering Research and Development Center, U.S. Army

    Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Miss. E-mail: Steve.H.Scott@

    erdc.usace.army.mil

    Sam S. Y. Wang, PhD, P.E., Director and Professor, National

    Center for Computational Hydrosciences and Engineering, the

    Univ. of Mississippi, Miss. E-mail: [email protected]

    Weiming Wu, PhD, Vice Chair of TC, Assistant Research

    Professor, National Center for Computational Hydrosciences and

    Engineering, the Univ. of Mississippi, Miss. E-mail:[email protected]

    Xinya Ying, PhD, Research Scientist, National Center for

    Computational Hydrosciences and Engineering, the Univ. of Mis-

    sissippi, Miss. E-mail: [email protected]

    598 / JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING ASCE / JULY 2004

    J. Hydraul. Eng. 2004.130:597-598.