Embed Size (px)


  • "SECTORAL ANALISES AND SECTORAL POLICY" INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCEAuthor(s): . VgsSource: Acta Oeconomica, Vol. 12, No. 3/4 (1974), pp. 391-398Published by: Akadmiai KiadStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40728303 .Accessed: 10/06/2014 03:51

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.


    Akadmiai Kiad is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Acta Oeconomica.


    This content downloaded from on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 03:51:42 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions


  • Acta Oeconomica Vol. 12 (3-4), pp. 391-398 (1974)


    B. VGS


    The organizers of the conference had the following three aims: - to give a survey of the problems and actual knowledge of sectoral analyses, - to gather comprehensive information about actions taken on basis of sec-

    toral analyses on both the micro- and the macro-levels, - to provide a forum for the representatives of different countries to exchange

    their experience. The lively interest aroused is shown by the fact that about half of the partici-

    pants (35 persons) came from foreign - 6 socialist and 12 non-socialist - countries. After the opening address of State Secretary /. Hetnyi, First Vice Pres-

    ident of the National Planning Office, 22 papers were discussed. Five further papers were distributed, but not discussed, since their authors were not present. Half of the

    papers were submitted by representatives of socialist countries, with four Hungarian specialists among them. Beside plenary meetings discussing the papers also group discussions were included in the programme. Owing to their informal nature, they provided good opportunities for direct discussion of questions related to the subject. The findings of the conference were summarized at the closing session by

    Roman, Director of the Research Institute for Industrial Economics of the Hun-

    garian Academy of Sciences. In his opening address I. Hetnyi spoke about the differences in the con-

    ceptual interpretation of the "sector", as well as about the limitations of this term and the necessity of its use. He emphasized separately the requirements which demand to draw the limits of sectors as a practical task. In this context he briefly outlined the tasks and system of Hungarian economic control and planning, the direction and

    perspectives of Hungarian economic development, and, in addition, how the central

    development programmes and the support of the progressive sectors are connected to all that.

    The papers and the relevant discussions gave account of the problems of the two far-reaching subjects mentioned in the title and of the related international ex-


    * The conference was held in Budapest between 19th - 22nd April 1974, organized jointly by the European Association of National Productivity Centres, and the Research Institute for Industrial Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (the Hungarian member of the Association.)

    Acta Oeconomica 12, 1974

    This content downloaded from on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 03:51:42 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions


  • 392 REVIEWS

    Sectoral analyses

    In the course of the conference four main types of sectoral analyses were at the centre of interest: examination of the economic structure by sectors, comparison of the efficiency of sectors, analysis of the development and perspectives of sectors, and the examination of the inner structure of sectors.

    All of the papers were reflective of the idea that sectoral analyses were needed not only for the foundation of the development of individual sectors. Namely, a sec- tor shouldn't be analysed in itself separated from other spheres of the economy, not considering at least the sectors directly connected to it. At the same time, the demand was expressly formulated that the analyses must provide such information as will help decision-making in the given sector.

    According to their conception the papers are to be divided into two different groups. The two differed in whether it was the potentials for increasing national-level productivity, or those for increasing enterprise profitability that must be explored for guaranteeing an adequate economic growth and for the formulation of a corre- sponding sectoral policy. The real problem out of which this difference of concep- tions arises consists in that the growing profitability of an enterprise or of a group of enterprises does not necessarily guarantee the growth of productivity on the national level.

    Everybody agreed, however, that the most important questions of sectoral analyses are the weak structural points of sectors and branches, the factors influenc- ing the structure of sectors and their effects, and the future development of the sec- tors (enterprises, group of enterprises).

    Mikls Simrs (Economic Research Institute) paper, reporting on the analysis of relative sectoral efficiency illustrates clearly the differences between the two conceptions mentioned above. A method already tested in practice was pre- sented. It is suitable, first of all, for analysing the sectors relative to each other. In this study economic efficiency is considered as a measure for ranking the sectors. The tool of measurement is a complex efficiency indicator, which evaluates each sector on the basis of net income relative to capital and wages-inputs.

    Computations based on this indicator demonstrated remarkable differences between the competitive industrial branches covered by the analysis. The results have shown that the efficiency ranking of industrial branches is fundamentally de- termined by the net income produced. In the course of the research computations were made - beside home market prices - with prices received on markets of socialist and capitalist countries. These have shown that on the basis of domestic prices there is a smaller dispersion of sectoral efficiency between industrial branches.

    Several papers were read about the applicability and problems of mathemati- cal methods in sectoral examinations. D. M. Kazakevitch (Soviet Union) gave a summary survey of the mathematical and methodological experiences gained in his country in the theoretical and practical work connected with the simulation and Op-

    tera Oeconomica 12, 1974

    This content downloaded from on Tue, 10 Jun 2014 03:51:42 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions


  • REVIEWS 393

    timization of the development of productive sectors. D. van Vynsberghe (Belgium) gave account of the theoretical and methodological problems arising in the course of linking sectoral with regional points of view in input-output analyses. For illustration he used the results of actual investigations that had covered the Brabant province in Belgium.

    A.S. Nekrasov (Soviet Union) summarized the problems of the optimal planning of the power economy by relying on the experience of such work in his country. He stressed especially that the extreme diversity of this branch and the high complexity of its internal and external relations necessitate a system approach and the application of a model system that makes use of the tools supplied by economic mathematics. Solving the problem answers had to be sought to two interrelated problems: how to find the optimum proportions in the development of the power economy branches, and how to provide for a fast raising of the level of fuel- and energy exploitation.

    The model is built on a division of the general planning tasks of a given period into a hierarchic system of tasks, differentiated according to regions and sectoral characteristics. The model system consists of three subsystems: models of the na- tional economy, of the sectors, and of the regions. The author pointed out that the system as a whole must be in harmony with the actual structure of the power economy, as well as with the total and partial power balances.

    A similar view was expressed in the paper about the prognostic models of the long-range development of the machine building industry and about the experience of the application of these models, that may be generalized. This paper was submit- ted by a Czechoslovak group of authors: M. Mares, A. Hrbek, B. Valova and K. Stransky. An analysis in a similar field was the subject of l Harne9 s (Denmark) study, presenting the structural analysis of a trade association uniting machine building and metal-working enterprises and the rationalisation measures taken as a result.

    Good examples for the analyses of the inner structure, development and perspective of sectors, as well as for the differences in the purposes of analyses are provided by the papers of B. Lindvig (Norway), D. Ibielski (GFR), and the joint authors E. Ilijev-A. V. Kuntchev (Bulgaria).

    In his introduction, B. Lindvig summarized briefly the sectoral investigations carried