Upload
joanna-rose
View
231
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SECONDARY DATA ANALYSISSECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS BOLIVIA BOLIVIA
VERONA VERONA 200 20011
SDA 2000 SDA 2001
ModelV=R-CC (Cuban
Methodology)Inexistent
MethodologyQuantitative and
Qualitative
QuantitativePCA-Clustering
Variables Used
SDA 2000
Drought
Frost
Flooding
Agricultural Potential
Forest Potential
Income
Physical Access
Number of persons per
room
Illiteracy
Development index, relative
to gender
Proportion of the population that seeks medical
attention at health centers
Gap of unsatisfied basic needs between
indigenous and Spanish speaking
families
0,2500,2700,2900,3100,3300,3500,3700,390
Ciudad
Riesgo
RISK OF UNEMPLOYMENT AND
INFORMAL ACTIVITIES FOR CITIES
Variables Used
SDA 2001
Outcome Indicators
• Poverty Index (% of the population)• Income US$ PPA• Human Development Index• Unsatisfied Basic Needs (% of population)• Development index, relative to gender (gap between men and women)
Independent Indicators• Proportion of the population with access to drinkable water• Number of doctors by population• Proportion of the population that seeks medical attention at traditional doctors• Proportion of the population that seeks medical attention at health centers• Accumulation of persons in • Population with shortage inadequate or improvised• Shortage of Services• Shortage of Sanitation Services• Shortage of Energy• Shortage of Education• Shortage of Access to Health Facilities• School attendance (measured in years)
• Number of Primary Schools• Number of pupils at primary schools• Expenditures of municipalities in maternal care• Gap of unsatisfied basic needs between Indigenous and Spanish speaking families• Total consultations per capita• Number of health posts• Number of basic support hospitals• Number of support hospitals• Number of service schools (pre-primary)• Number of pre-primary registered pupils• Number of service schools (secondary)• Number of secondary registered pupils
• Number of service schools (superior)• Number of superior registered pupils• Number of service schools (alternative)• Number of alternative registered pupils• Total Investment in Agriculture 1994• Total Investment in Health 1994• Total Investment in Education 1994• Total Investment in basic reparation 1994• Total Investment in Agriculture 1995• Total Investment in Health 1995• Total Investment in Education 1995• Total Investment in basic reparation 1995• Total Investment in Agriculture 1996• Total Investment in Health 1996
• Total Investment in Education 1996• Total Investment in basic reparation 1996• Total Investment in Agriculture 1997• Total Investment in Health 1997• Total Investment in Education 1997• Total Investment in basic reparation 1997• Total number of policlinics• Access to fluvial drainage 1994• Access to disposition of solid waste 1994• Number of industrial establishments• Number of financial establishments• Expenditures of municipios in gender related activities• Estimated number of organizations
Descriptive Indicators
• Average altitude• Average yearly rainfall• Degree of urbanization• Population density• Urban NBI (population with unsatisfied basic needs)• Rural NBI• Population with satisfied basic needs (%)• Population living at the threshold of poverty (%)• Population living in moderated poverty (%)• Indigent population (%)• Marginal population (%)
SDA 2000 SDA 2001
Advantages
Easy to:UnderstandEstablish the difference between a poverty map and traditional studies on food security
Technically accepted.
Problems
Technically “questionable”Quality of the Information
Hard to understand for the government autoritiesNot easy to establish the differences between poverty map and othersInformation/ Qual/MVal
SDA 2000 SDA 2001
Process Broad and continuing participation of partners.Results broadly disseminated
Without participation
Advantages Results:Technically ValidatedAccepted and used (EBRP)
We can easily continue changing the results
Impact WFP positioned as expert in Food Security.
WFP positioned as expert in Food Security
Problems Appropriation of results.Institutionalisation
RESULTS VAM 2000 AND SAF 2001RESULTS VAM 2000 AND SAF 2001
ResultsResults
General: Same
Detail: Some differences
Why?Why?High correlations in the variables used
in the SDA 2001.
Weighting by population in the SDA 2001
Combination of the both SDACombination of the both SDA