22
SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005 Patrick Cannon, 24 Old Buildings [email protected]

SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

  • Upload
    lula

  • View
    35

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005. Patrick Cannon, 24 Old Buildings [email protected]. Special Situations. Partnerships and land Unit trusts – unwinding issues Lease anti-avoidance Disclosure – Langham v Veltema in SDLT. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial

property

London10 March 2005

Patrick Cannon, 24 Old [email protected]

Page 2: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Special Situations

• Partnerships and land• Unit trusts – unwinding issues• Lease anti-avoidance• Disclosure – Langham v Veltema in

SDLT

Page 3: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Property Owning Partnerships The New Rules

• Transparency principle• Contrast with Stamp Duty• Contrast with Capital Gains Tax • SDLT chargeable on:

- The transfer of land into a partnership by a partner.- The acquisition of an interest in a partnership.- The transfer of land out of a partnership to a partner.

Page 4: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Contribution to a PartnershipBefore the transfer

Partnership

Prop 1

Value £1m

Prop 2

Value £1m

50% 50%

A B

Page 5: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Contribution to a PartnershipC joins the partnership. C transfers Property 3 worth £1m to the partnership as a partnership contribution and becomes entitled to 33.4% of the partnership profits

Partnership

SDLT is charged on £1M x 66.6%, being the total of the other partners' shares after the transfer

A B C

33.3% 33.3%33.4%

Prop 1

£1m

Prop 2

£1m

Prop 3

£1m

Page 6: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

The Partnership Formula

(RCP x MV) = (RCP x AC)

Where:RCP = relevant chargeable proportionMV = market valueAC = actual consideration

Page 7: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

The RCP

In the RCP x MV calculation, RCP = (100 – SLP)%

In the RCP x AC calculation, RCP = SLP %

SLP = ‘sum of the lower proportions’

= the aggregate of the partnership interest, after the transfer, of the transferor and any partner who is connected with the transferor.

Page 8: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Connected Parties and Actual Consideration

In a simple case involving no connected parties eg slide 5, SLP would be 33.4%, the partnership share acquired by C.

If B was C’s spouse, SLP is 66.7% so the SDLT charge is on 33.3% of market value.

If the property is worth £2m and C receives £1m from the partnership in addition to the partnership share (and still assume that B is C’s spouse) the computation is

(33.3% x £2m) + (66.7% x £1m)

= £666,000 + £667,000 = £1,333,000 x 4% = £53,320

Page 9: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Transfer of Partnership InterestWhere a partnership owns an interest in UK

land and:• An existing partner transfers all or part of their partnership interest to a new or existing partner for money or money's worth, or

• A person becomes a partner and an existing partner reduces their partnership share (or retires from the partnership) and withdraws money or money's worth from the partnership.

Page 10: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Transfer of partnership interest

Before the transfer

Partnership

A B

50% 50%

Prop 1

Value £2m

Prop2

Value £1m

Non-property

asset value £1m

Page 11: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Transfer of partnership interest

C buys B's 50% share in the partnership for £2m

Partnership

SDLT is charged on £1.5m, being 50% x £3m. £3m is the market value of the real property. The charge would be on the £1.5m market value of C's acquired share in the properties even if C did not pay market value to B, provided some consideration is given in money or money's worth.

A B C

50% 50%

£2m

Prop 1

Value £2m

Prop 2

Value £1m

Non-property

asset value

£1m

Sale

Page 12: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Transfer of land out of a partnershipBefore the transfer

Partnership

A B C

33.3% 33.3% 33.4%

Prop 1

Value

£5m

Prop 2

Value

£3m

Prop 3

Value

£2m

Page 13: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Transfer of land out of a partnershipC retires and Property 3 is transferred to him. Property 3 is worth

£2m, 20% of the value of the partnership real property.

Partnership

SDLT on RCP which is 100 – 33.4% = 66.7% of M.V.

Note: 33.4% deducted only if Property 3 was acquired pre 20 October 2003 or stamp duty or SDLT was paid on partnership's acquisition of Property 3.

A B C

33.316.7+50.0%

33.316.7+50.0%

33.433.4- 0%_ Transfer of Property 3

Prop 1 Prop 2

Page 14: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

What ‘Transfers’ are Taxed?

• No consideration = No SDLT• Partnership debt as consideration?• Where there is an actual transfer of an

interest in a partnership – actual consideration

• Where there is an incoming and a retiring or reducing partner – withdrawal of money

• Avoid withdrawal – dilution/high debt solution• No ‘arrangement’ - retirement/withdrawal ok

Page 15: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

The Para 14 ‘Problem’

• ‘Purchaser’ is the person acquiring an increased partnership share

• Partnership share = income sharing proportion

• So is a mere change in profit shares a taxable ‘transfer’?

• Transfer of ‘an interest in a partnership’ is required

• Revenue’s view of ‘consideration’

Page 16: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Partnership v Unit Trust

• Unit trust - a company (except for ‘connected company’ mv

charge); units are ‘shares’ - no ‘look through’ - exemption for ‘seeding’• Partnership - not a unit trust - ‘look through’ - no ‘seeding’ exemption• Contribution of partnership to unit trust?

Page 17: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Unit Trust Unwinding

Vendor Purchaser

Property

Units

Sale of units

Unit TrusteesJersey Distribution of

Property

Page 18: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Unit Trust Unwinding

• Is there a market value charge where unit holder is a company?

• S 53 FA 2003• S 101(7) FA 2003: not a ‘company’• S 839 ICTA 1988 : ut is a ‘company’• If ut is a ‘company’ then it is

connected but s 54 FA 2003 case 3 exemption for company distributions applies

Page 19: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Unit Trust Unwinding

• Capital Allowances• Not s 198(2) CAA 2001• ‘Connected’ for s 839 ICTA• S 266/267 CAA 2001 – deemed sale

on succession for no balancing allowance/balancing charge

• Watch earlier s 198(2) election on original contribution

Page 20: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Leases: FA 2004 Changes

• Any variation other than to a lease = acquisition of a chargeable interest

• Variation of a lease = acquisition only where:

(a) Variation takes effect as grant of new lease; (b) Variation reduces rent – acquisition by

lessee; or(c) Variation reduces term – acquisition by

lessor. • Variations involving break clauses etc ? Para

2(b) Sch 17A FA 2003

Page 21: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Leases to Nominees

• Grant of lease to nominee – disregarded for SDLT

• First non-exempt assignment = deemed grant of a lease by assignor on same terms as assignee holds lease

• Aimed at taxing rent – what about premium?

• Effect of deeming provisions in tax?• Marshall v Kerr, R v Dimsey

Page 22: SDLT – Current Problem Areas in Commercial property London 10 March 2005

Disclosure in SDLT

• Langham v Veltema [2004] EWCA Civ 193

• Inland Revenue Guidance 23/12/04• SDLT implications ?