Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SDC Methodology Update
Meeting Agenda• Recap• Public Comment• Revisit issues from Meeting #1
• Plans on the project list• Lake Oswego-Milwaukie Bridge Connection to Trolley Trail
• History of SDC Collection in the District• FCS Group Presentation
• Issue Paper #1: Area-Specific System Development Charges• District Growth Forecasts
• Discussion of SDC Methodologies• Next Steps
RecapCapital Improvement Plan Process
NCPRD Board of Directors
Milwaukie City Council / City of Milwaukie
Partner Organizations
Neighborhood District Associations (NDAs) & Community Planning
Organizations (CPOs)
Community Groups
RecapSteering Committee Work
Partner Organizations
Neighborhood District Associations (NDAs) & Community Planning
Organizations (CPOs)
Community Groups
Share the plan with the community!
Milwaukie City Council/City of Milwaukie
Public CommentRelated to the District’s SDC Methodologyor Capital Improvement Plan
All District Sites
Issues from Meeting #1
Plans on the Projects List
• Goal: Add plans as appendices to District Master Plan as they are completed• Planning as part of CIP is an accepted practice• Can use SDCs on any portion of a capital project, which includes planning
Lake Oswego-Milwaukie Connection
Steering Committee Question:How are line items 29 and 30 different?
Staff Recommendation:• No. 29, revise Project Description: “Trail Systems may include
the Philips Creek Trail and/or a multi-use trail which would connect to a new Willamette River Pedestrian Bridge.”
• No. 30, revise Project Name: “Willamette River Pedestrian Bridge”
• No. 30, revise Project Description: New Willamette River Pedestrian Bridge from Lake Oswego to the Oak Grove/Milwaukie area.
History of SDCsAt NCPRD
History of SDC Collection at NCPRD1994 Methodology
• Uniform methodology:No zones
• Overlay component:Establishing a higher SDC rate within East Sunnyside Village
Note: Overlay not shown on map.
Labels Refer to District “Neighborhood Areas”
History of SDC Collection at NCPRD2007 Methodology Update
• Uniform component:Plus a districtwide rate
• Area-Specific methodology:Three distinct SDC zones
• Overlay component:Establishing a higher SDC rate within East Sunnyside Village
History of SDC Collection at NCPRD2014 Ordinance Amendment
• Area-Specific methodology:Three distinct SDC zones
• Overlay component:Establishing a higher SDC rate within East Sunnyside Village
Issue Paper #1 and Growth ProjectionsFCS Group Presentation
SDC Steering Committee Meeting #2January 17, 2018
North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District
Page 19FCS GROUP
Agenda
Uniform vs. Area-Specific SDCs (Issue Paper 1)– The three options– Advantages and disadvantages
A Zone-Specific Approach– Map– Preliminary growth forecasts by zone
Decision Tree Next Steps
Page 20FCS GROUP
Uniform vs. Area-Specific SDCs
Uniform SDCs Area-specific SDCs
1. Overlays2. Zones
See details in Issue Paper 1.
“The decision of whether or how to implement area-specific SDCs is ultimately a policy choice rather than a technical choice. While area-specific SDCs can enhance perceived or actual equity, they do not make an SDC methodology more technically sound or legally defensible.”
Page 21FCS GROUP
Advantages and DisadvantagesAdvantages Disadvantages
Uniform • Administrative ease
• Most flexibility in spending
• Potential inequity
Area-Specific with Overlays
• Equitableisolation of high-cost area(s)
• Less flexibility with overlay revenues
Area-Specific with Zones
• Equity• Continuity with
current practice
• Recordkeeping• Least flexibility in
spending
Page 22FCS GROUP
Zone-Specific SDCs
Page 23FCS GROUP
Preliminary Growth Forecasts
Source: North Clackamas PRD comprehensive planand Metroscope Gamma TAZ Forecast
2018 20352018-2035
ChangeDistrict-WidePopulation 104,662 120,721 16,059Employees 80,947 103,971 23,024Zone 1Population 43,146 49,282 6,136Employees 44,757 57,217 12,460Zone 2Population 33,301 36,529 3,228Employees 8,170 10,647 2,477Zone 3Population 28,215 34,910 6,695Employees 28,020 36,107 8,086
Page 24FCS GROUP
Decision Tree
Page 25FCS GROUP
Next Steps
Tonight Provide feedback on uniform vs. area-specific SDCs. February 7 Review of project costs with Steve Duh March 14 Review of draft SDCs
John GhilarducciPrincipal
425.867.1802 ext. 225
Contact FCS GROUP:425.867.1802
www.fcsgroup.com
Doug GabbardProject Manager
503.252.3001
Next StepsNovember/December
•Meeting No. 1•Overview of Changes to the District•Review CIP Projects List
January
•Meeting No. 2•Finalize CIP Projects List (Recap)•Consider SDC Methodology (Zones, Overlays, etc.)
February
•Meeting No. 3•Review project costs for projects on the CIP Projects List
March
•Meeting No. 4•Review final CIP projects list, estimated project costs, growth projections, rate calculations and draft of SDC Ordinance
•Finalize recommendations to be made to the Board of Directors
April/May
•NCPRD Board of Directors Meeting•Present Recommendations to the NCPRD Board of Directors
Com
munity E
ngagement
Next Time
