56
Screening For Quality One mill’s experience Gary Parobeck Acrowood [email protected]

Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Gary Parobeck Acrowood

[email protected]

Page 2: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Appvion Roaring Spring, PA

From length screening to thickness screening.

It was a long haul but worth the trip.

Page 3: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Where is Roaring Spring PA

Page 4: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience
Page 5: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience
Page 6: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Mill Information

End product - carbonless and security papers.

Five Batch Digesters

Hardwood chips – 80% manufactured on site. 20% saw mill and chip mill supply.

Page 7: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

The Screening System Before

Page 8: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience
Page 9: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience
Page 10: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Getting There

Testing – Testing – Testing

First investigations in 1999

Chips were sent to various suppliers for screening and overs treatment testing

The end product was sent on for independent cook trials

Close review by mill personnel

Page 11: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Testing

Page 12: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Testing

Page 13: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Results

Thickness screening offered the greatest savings and shortest payback

Cracking was shown to provide the mill the best result for their cooking process

A compromised was reached based on available funds and space

Page 14: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

New Thickness Screens

Model 1730 Screw Conveyor

Model 1230 Side Fed Screw

Model 55144 DiamondRoll Thickness Screen

Model 35108 DiamondRoll Fines Screen

Note – the new system was designed to send the overs through a sizer and then recirculate this product back over the screening system.

Page 15: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Side View

Page 16: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience
Page 17: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Installation Photos – During Demo

Page 18: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Installation Photos

Bucket elevator at left feeds the screw conveyor which in turn feeds the infeed screw distributor.

Page 19: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Installation Photos

Page 20: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Installation Photos

#1 and #2 Accepts Chutes below DTS

DFS #2 Accepts bypass - above DFS fines and accepts - below

Page 21: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Installation Photos

Page 22: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Screen Performance

Design Capacity 100 green tons per hour

Performance Guarantee:

Infeed Chip Quality Chip Quality after Screening ≤10% Overthick (+8mm T) ≤2.0% Overthick (+8mm T) >10% and ≤15% Overthick ≤2.5% Overthick >15% Overthick ≤3.0% Overthick

≤1.5% Fines (-3mm RH) ≤0.5% Fines (-3mm RH) >1.5% and ≤2.5% Fines ≤0.6% Fines >2.5% Fines ≤0.8% Fines

Fines removed by DiamondRoll screen ≤0.5% Accepts loss (+2mm thickness)

Page 23: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Mill Classification

Page 24: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

To the Digester – Old System

Over 1 ½” RH – 3 %

Over 8mm T: 11%

1 1/8” RH: 7%

7/8” RH:17%

5/8” RH: 27%

3/8” RH: 27%

Pins (3/16 RH): 7% Dust: 1%

Page 25: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Average Overs 6mm 4mm 2mm P&F Accepts

Summer '12 17.63 28.37 39.14 13.74 1.11 81.26

Page 26: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

To the Digester New System

Their new stack was 10mm, 8mm, 6mm, 4mm, 2mm and a 3mm RH

After screen with out the sizer product they saw 96.9% Accepts

Page 27: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

What did this mean to the mill

Yield improvement

liquor savings of 12,000 gallons per day.

Overall improvement in Digester operation

Cleaner, Safer Working Environment.

Page 28: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

The Perfect Storm

Page 29: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

The Perfect Storm

The Sizer product is returned to the infeed for re-screening

A fraction of the returned material contained chunks that were just over 8mm thick and as such were rejected as an over.

These pieces were small enough to also pass the Sizer grate again.

Page 30: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

The Perfect Storm

As a result overthick built up to a level which over-ran the sizer capacity

The mill could bypass the Sizer and could continue to run

This of course meant no overs removal and everything but the fines went to the Digester

Page 31: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

What to do?

Open up the DiamondRoll Thickness Screen to allow the larger pieces to pass

Or – Install a smaller grate in the Sizer thus reducing the size of the product.

Page 32: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Consequences

If the screen is opened up a higher percentage of overthick will make it to the Digester.

If the Sizer is closed down fines and pins will go up, ultimately greater fiber loss

Page 33: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Action Taken – Step One

The mill has resolved this issue (for now) by revising the screen IRO:

First half (infeed) 7.5mm IRO

Second half – 9.5mm IRO

Last two shafts – 13mm IRO.(Gate)

Page 34: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

IRO Change

The IRO is changed by shims between the bearing housings.

Page 35: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

IRO Change

Page 36: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Discharge end gate

Page 37: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Results

Accepts to the Digester dropped from 94% to 90% due to allowing more overthick.

But it did solve the problem of the overs build up and Sizer plugging

Page 38: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Action Taken Step Two

They worked with the Sizer Manufacturer to make grate changes

They were able to close the DiamondRoll thickness screen back down to a 7.5 MM IRO – All but the last two that Remain at a 13MM IRO

Automated gate at the discharge end of the thickness screen

Page 39: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Overview

They are happy with the system and it has shown great savings.

Currently accepts to the digester are back in 94% range.

Their target is to bring the accepts to the Digester up to 96% or better. They have calculated that for every 1% at the digester they save $000,000 per year.

Page 40: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Questions ?

Page 41: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Slicers & Crackers

Page 42: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Chip Slicers

Page 43: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Chip Slicer Basics

Gravity Feed

Bottom Discharge

Slices Chips to Thickness

Two Co-Rotating Elements: Anvil Rotor and Knife Ring

Typically 95% Reduction Efficiency

Must be protected from contaminants

Page 44: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

The anvils push the chips into the knives, while centrifugal force holds them flat against the knife ring

Chip Slicer Function

123 rpm

369 rpm

Page 45: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Chip Slicer Drive

Single 150 HP, 1200 rpm motor

Belt drive to the gear train

Simple gear box design

Shear Pin Coupling

Page 46: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Wear Parts

There are six main wear part components: Anvils

Knives

Counter knives

Knife carriers

Wear plates

Gauge plates

Knife

Anvil

Knife Carrier

Wear Plate

Counter Knife

Gauge Plate

Page 47: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Gear Assembly

Page 48: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Chip Quality

95% Reduction Efficiency

10-15% Fines and Pin chip production

The thickness control is adjustable

Chip distribution into the slicer is adjustable

Summer & winter chip quality is essentially the same

Page 49: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Chip Slicer Efficiency - Evaluation on Southern Pine

Model 1511i Chip Slicer Configured for 10mm Thickness Control

Sample +10mm T +8mm T +6mm T +4mm T +2mm T +3mm RH Pan

Infeed 66.5% 16.6% 12.9% 3.8% 0.2% -- --

Infeed 69.4% 17.3% 10.7% 2.6% <0.1% -- --

Slicer Product 0.4% 31.7% 29.7% 22.9% 12.9% 1.9% 0.5%

Slicer Product 0.9% 36.1% 29.8% 20.7% 10.1% 1.8% 0.5%

Results*: 99.0% >10mm Overthick Reduction Efficiency 1.9% Pin Chip Generation (<2mm T, >3mm RH) 0.5% Fines Generation (<3mm RH)

Chip Quality

* Results based on the average of both Infeed and Slicer Product Samples

Page 50: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Chip Crackers

Page 51: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Reducers And Drivelines

Two reducers drive the rolls

Large universal joint drivelines connect the rolls and reducers

Swing arms support the rolls

Page 52: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Chip Cracker

• Overthick chips are compressed by two diamond tipped rolls which gently crack the chips

• Cracking allows proper liquor penetration in pulping

• Can adjust performance by changing pressure and/or gap between rolls

Page 53: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Cracker Rolls and Segments

• Square central box

• Machined attachment surfaces

• Integrated register lip that locates individual segments and transfers cracking forces from the segment to the central shaft

Page 54: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Cracker Performance

High overthick treatment efficiency –+95% fissuring effectiveness at 8mm chip thickness control.

Low pins and fines production

Typically <2.5% combined pins and fines (pins <7mm, >3mm RH, fines <3mm RH)

Page 55: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Cracker Pulping Response

More effective overthick treatment results in better pulping response

“Hardwood – Cracked overthick chips produced (3.4 to 3.8%) more absolute wood to pulp yield than rechipped overthick chips. Knots were (85% to 89%) less and Shives (22% to 26%) less with Cracked overthick chips compared to Rechipped overthick chips.” Econotech study in 2006

Page 56: Screening For Quality One mill’s experience

Cracker Pulping Response

More effective overthick treatment results in better pulping response

“Softwood – Cracked overthick chips produced (2.5 to 2.6%) more absolute wood to pulp yield than rechipped overthick chips. Knots were (71% to 86%) less and Shives (6% to 37%) less with Cracked overthick chips compared to Rechipped overthick chips.” Econotech study in 2006