Upload
vokhanh
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
October 23rd | 5:30 – 8:00 pm
2 Mainpro+ Credits
SCOPE = Seamless CareImproved Access to Specialist Directory, MSK
Support, Mental Health & Addictions Resources, and Pharmacy Consultation
Agenda
2
5:30 – 5:45 Dinner and Networking
5:45 – 5:55Welcome and Introductions
Dr. Pauline Pariser – Clinical Lead, Mid-West Sub-Region
5:55 – 6:25MSK - Rapid Access Clinic (RAC) Low Back Pain
Miriam Vanmeurs, Shama Umar – Toronto Central LHIN
6:25 – 6:55Pharmacy Consultation
Lisa McCarthy, Andrea Calvert, Kate Walsh – Toronto Central LHIN
6:55 – 7:15 Break-Out Session
7:15 – 7:30Specialist Directory
Jane Williams, Cynthia Djaja Putra – UHN Digital
7:30 – 7:50Mental Health & Addictions Resources
Hannah Matthews – Canadian Mental Health Association
7:50– 8:00Closing Remarks
Dr. Pauline Pariser
Proof of Concept Model
@
Patient logs into
application, inputs
symptoms
Available physician can connect with patient
through a variety of modalities, provides diagnosis
and treatment; patient EMR updated with
encounter.
Physicians to respond within 2 business days.
Physician may provide follow-up in-person
care or order laboratory tests
Patient can view notes and
instructions
Same Day or
Next Day
1
2
3
Secure Video,
Messaging &
Voice/audio
Key Principles
6
Principles
Sustainability Within our publicly funded system
Quality Care Support continuity of primary care and importance of the patient-provider relationship
Discourages patients seeking outside use (walk-in clinics, Emergency) for primary care needs
Accessibility Patient centred care; supports “Patients First”
More convenient and timely access to same day/next day care
Measurable Evaluate the need and demand for the service
Can be evaluated against metrics and indicators to show efficacy and safety
Regional Regional coverage model
Strengthen professional relationships, trust and mentorship
Aligns with LHIN and sub-region Primary Care planning
Proof of concept – status update*
7 *September 17, 2018
4 LHINs are currently using eVisit Primary Care
Central West LHIN – Live Sept 2017 Waterloo Wellington LHIN – Live
Mar 2018
Central East LHIN – Live Jul 2018 Mississauga Halton LHIN – Live Aug
2018
43 providers enrolled
(Target 40 providers)
40 providers enrolled
(Target 75 providers)
13 providers enrolled
(Target 40 providers)
26 providers enrolled
(Target 40 providers)
1,887 patients invited 9,625 patients invited 510 patients invited 450 patients invited
894 eVisits completed 1,502 eVisits completed 20 eVisits completed 21 eVisits completed
Remuneration
8
Participation Clinical visit
$1800 for participation in pilots meeting the following criteria:
o Participation in clinical/program model development
o Enrol 200+ patients per participating physician
o Adopting and adjusting workflows as new models are
trialled and adjusted
o Pre- and post- demonstration survey
o Pre- and post- demonstration interview
o Data collection requirements
Billing codes:
o Phone/messaging – minor assessment - $15
o Phone/messaging – intermediate assessment – $21.70
o Video – minor assessment –$21.70 (A001 equivalent)
o Video – intermediate assessment –$33.70 (A007 equivalent)
Secure video is a two-way synchronous visit so it is billable at the same
rate as an in-person visit Intermediate
Secure messaging, voice and phone, is an asynchronous visit and there
are new fee codes for the pilot only
FHN/FHO physician visits (with
their own rostered patients)
BSM (i.e., FHT)
physician visits (with their own
rostered patients)
FHN/FHO/BSM physician visits with
patients not directly rostered to the
physician
FHG physician visits CCM/FFS physician
visits
Other
Shadow billing rate (15%) Shadow billing rate (15%) Full rate (100%) Full rate (100%) Full rate (100%) TBD based on individual
contract
Timelines and Targets
Minimum 40 physicians to participate
o Enrolled by November 2018
Each physician to invite minimum 200 patients
o Invited by December 2018
Physicians and patients will be onboarded until end of March 2019
o MOH LTC will then receive and review 3rd party evaluation report from WCH
9
What impact is eVisit having on you?
“Benefit: some of patients who I normally see in office for f/u or managed by phone I can now do more efficiently by
eVisit, this is a big benefit.”
“Decrease back and forth with staff! Huge Increase in efficiency. Patients are happier to interact with doc not with
an admin. My admins are happier too “
“Ability to do it at my own time. I don’t feel like I am always connected. If I have time, I can quickly answer a question
during lunch. Having a text come in that I have a new visit is great, as I can check it and know if I need to respond or if it
can wait.” “I have so many examples. I think my
postpartum depression and my
support to her is a good one.
It also is good for follow up instead of
bringing patients back for their
results.”
“For patients it makes them feel that their needs
were addressed without the need to come down
to see me.”
What impact is eVisit having on your
patients?
“Instead of Coming in they have the ability
to get questions answered quickly and an
avenue to get to me. Nobody has abused it
thus far. Only had to f/u up with two
patients after an eVisit by phone as it was a
complex question and it was easier to talk
to them.”
“Patient say they Like the ability to reach
out to ask simple questions or have their
f/u appointment done this way. “
“Patient has two kids, both kids have
taken a pictures and tract over time. Had
a mole took a picture every week and it
was fine. This was great, as the patients
didn’t have to come into the office”
“I have 2 patients tell me
how much they love this. It is
more our generation, busy
and cannot come in and
their needs are minimal”
What Providers are saying about EAPC eVisit
Musculoskeletal Project: Toronto Central LHIN
• Evidence shows that the need to address access to care for patients with Musculoskeletal (MSK)
conditions is growing. Wait time data shows that patients with MSK conditions spend the most time
waiting to access health care services, such as MRI, even though they may not be the best options for
them.
• Rapid Access Clinics (RACs) for MSK conditions will allow patients to receive appropriate care sooner,
reducing unnecessary wait times and making the best use of existing resources.
• Specialists receive more appropriate referrals which allow for more predictable practice and improved
wait list management. Also, Ontario’s health system will become more sustainable, with improved access
to appropriate and high quality care.
12
Musculoskeletal Project: Evidence for Action
Prevalence:
• 1 in 3 adults are affected by MSK diseases (e.g. arthritis, repetitive strain injuries), which will only grow as the
population ages
Surgical Utilization:
• MSK surgeries account for 15% and represent the lowest % completed within target, of surgical procedures in
Ontario
Opioid Dependency:
• Timely access to appropriate MSK services reduces the incidence of unnecessary opioid prescriptions. Any opioid
prescription carries with it a risk of opioid dependence
Utilization:
• 3.1M Ontarians made 8M outpatient visits associated with MSK in 2013/14 (5.6M were primary care visits, 560K
ED visits)
• At least 37% of MRIs in the province are ordered for MSK conditions
Clinical Appropriateness:
• Evidence for sustained reductions in inappropriate utilization (e.g.. Low back pain pilot in three sites saw
$500K/year in costs avoided in reducing imaging)
• Aging population will continue to require procedures that are clinically appropriate
13
The Transition from ISAEC to RAC LBP
• The Inter-professional Spine Assessment and Education Clinics (ISAEC) program was a pilot that has been in
place in the Toronto Central LHIN at University Health Network (UHN) since 2012.
• ISAEC Success Rates:
• 12 days is the average wait time for initial assessment
• Less than 6 weeks wait time to surgical assessment
• More than 96% of patients referred for consultation with a surgeon were surgically appropriate
• Less than 4% of ISAEC patients have gone on for specialist intervention
• Greater than 30% decrease in MRI utilization within the ISAEC network
• Less than 7% of patients have gone on to imaging or specialist intervention
• The ISAEC program is being expanded across the Toronto Central LHIN and will be referred to as Rapid
Access Clinics for Low Back Pain (RAC LBP) moving forward.
• Three additional hospitals that undertake spine surgery will receive referrals as part of the RAC LBP program:
1. Providence, St. Joseph’s and St. Michael’s Healthcare (St. Michael’s Hospital site)
2. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
3. Michael Garron Hospital14
Benefits of the Model
Patients:
• Timely access to comprehensive assessment and
consultation (within 4 weeks)
• Individualized evidence-informed self-management
plans
• Follow ups for patients identified to be at higher
risk for persistent or recurrent low back pain
• Streamlined access to specialists when indicated
• Maintains Primary Care Provider and patient choice
of surgeon
Primary Care:
• One point of contact for referrals through
centralized intake
• Shared-care model with consistent patient
messaging and enhanced communication between
providers (inter-professional model)
• Primary Care Provider education and support in
low back pain assessment and management
• Patient- and Primary Care Provider-centered
resources
• Initial assessment conducted by specially trained
Advanced Practice Providers who execute the
standardized model of care
16
Advanced Practice Providers (APPs)
• Skilled clinicians (Physiotherapists or Chiropractors) are the first and primary point of contact for consultation
and assessment of patients referred into RACs for LBP, and are responsible for delivering rapid patient
assessment and education for a specific population of low back pain patients, from their respective practice
location.
• They provide a defined program of care to the patient with an emphasis on education, self-management and
health promotion strategies.
• APPs will be connected to a Site Surgeon Sponsor (physician specialist) and Practice Leader (PL), based on
their location, who will provide clinical guidance and advanced LBP education
• APP practice locations can include: Community Health Centres; Family Health Teams; and other Health
Clinics within the Toronto Central LHIN
17
Primary Care Providers (PCPs)
• PCPs who will be able to refer patients to RAC LBP are physicians and nurse practitioners.
• PCPs will refer their patients, who meet specific referral criteria and cannot be managed through primary
care, to the MSK Central Intake so they can be matched to an Advanced Practice Provider (APP) close to
home.
• This shared-care management model, emphasizes the benefits of on-going communication between PCPs
and APPs. Therefore, PCPs will be kept informed of the recommended course of treatment for
management and chronicity of LBP for each of their patients out of the LBP RACs.
• PCPs must be enrolled to the RAC LBP program in order to refer patients. This entails the completion of
a short online on-boarding and registration module.
• This module has been created to familiarize PCPs with both the ISAEC model of care, inclusion and
exclusion criteria, and the referral process. It will support education on MSK clinical pathways,
including initial assessment and management and includes information about red and yellow flags as
well as low back assessment. The module only takes approximately 15 minutes to complete.
18
Primary Care Providers (PCPs)
• Once PCPs have completed the module they are enrolled into the program and will receive a RAC LBP
referral form.
• PCPs will receive communications once the RAC LBPs are ready to accept referrals in their sub-
region so they can enroll into the program. This will include a link to the online module. In addition,
they will also receive materials to support referral of their patients into the program.
• PCPs can expect to begin referring their patients into the RAC LBP in early 2019. This will likely begin
with the West and Mid-West sub-regions.
• PCPs who are interested in enrolling into the program are encouraged to join a waitlist via the ISAEC
website. Once the program is available in their sub-region these PCPs will be contacted directly with
enrollment details. To be added to the waitlist visit: http://www.isaec.org/how-do-i-obtain-referring-
privileges.html
19
Contact Information
• Toronto Central LHIN Lead for LBP Pathway
• Shama Umar, Senior Consultant, Performance Management: [email protected]
• Visit the ISAEC website for additional program information and resources for both patients
and providers at www.isaec.org.
20
Disclosures
• Presenters: • Andrea Calvert, Lisa McCarthy, Kate Walsh
• Relationships with commercial interests:
• Grants/Research Support: N/A
• Speakers Bureau/Honoraria: Lisa McCarthy has received travel expenses for speaking on behalf of deprescribing.org
• Consulting Fees: N/A
• Other: N/A
Extent of the Problem
• In 2016, ~2/3 Canadian adults aged > 65 yrstook 5 or more prescription medications
• 26.5% took 10 or more
• More drugs if: aged > 85 yrs, live in low-income or rural/remote neighbourhoods
• Each additional medication for an Ontario senior increases risk of hospitalization by 2-3% after controlling for health status and other confounders
Canadian Institute of Health Information 2018
Allin et al. Health Services Res 2017;52(4)
Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing
• Women > men
• In 2013:• $419 million spent ($75 per Senior)
• $1.4 billion in extra health system costs
• In 2016: • 49.4% of Canadian seniors had at least
one claim for a potentially risk drug (on the Beers list)
Morgan et al. CMAJ Open 2016
Canadian Institute of Health Information 2018
Rational Prescribing
• WHO Definition:• The situation in which patients receive medications
appropriate to their clinical needs, in doses that meet their own individual requirements for a sufficient length of time, with the lowest cost to them and their community
• Traditionally, emphasis has been on how to initiate therapy, less focus on when to stop or back off
De Vries TP et al. Guide to good prescribing. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1994
Deprescribing
The planned process of reducing or
stopping medications that may no
longer be of benefit or may be causing
harm.
The goal is to reduce medication
burden while improving quality of life.
Acknowledgement:
www.deprescribing.org
Deprescribing
Is part of good prescribing - backing off
when doses are too high, or stopping
medications that are no longer needed.
By necessity, deprescribing (and [by
extension] rational prescribing) involves
EVERYONE (people, caregivers, health
care providers, policy makers etc.)
Acknowledgement:
www.deprescribing.org
SCOPE Pharmacy Services - Principles
1. Compliments, not duplicates, services offered by community pharmacists.
2. Prioritizes the primary care provider-person-community pharmacist relationship.
Potential Differences From Existing Community Pharmacy Services
• Liaise about but do not provide dispensing services• Compliments MedsCheck, Pharmaceutical Opinion programs and other services offered
• Time for a “deeper dive”• Pharmacists with advanced practice credentials and experience
• Links to other system resources e.g., advanced adherence support, supplies
• Offering home visits
Comprehensive Medication Review
• GOAL: Right medication(s) with the right(s) dose at the right time(s)
• For each medication, pharmacists aim to ensure:
• a known and valid indication
• maximized efficacy
• safety
• optimized adherence
• Written recommendations to PCP and patient with discussion of implementation plan
Focused Assessments
• Patient-specific inquiries about a particular drug or disease state
• Examples:• Suspected adverse drug reactions
• Management of drug interactions
• Deprescribing and personalized tapering protocols
• Adherence reviews
• Medication-related causes of symptoms e.g., syncope, falls
• Pharmacogenomics
• Antibiotic recommendations
• Pain management
• Drug use in pregnancy and lactation
Medication Information
• Different from focused assessment in that usually not patient-specific
• Requires review of current evidence • Examples:
• Recommend a particular agent or administration schedule
• How does the new direct oral anticoagulant/antihyperglycemic/new agent compare to others in its class?
• Evaluate the risk of a theoretical drug interaction
• Quantify the incidence of an adverse drug reaction
• 89 year old female living alone
• Multiple comorbidities including CAD, newly diagnosed diabetes, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis
• Polypharmacy w/ many OTCs and supplements
• Rarely leaves the house due to pain and poor mobility
• Patient had concerns about her dependence on sleep aids, multiple medications
• Referral to assist with deprescribingCase 1
Photo by Bruno Aguirre on Unsplash
Interventions
• Developed oxazepam taper schedule, routine phone check-ins and follow up visits for monitoring and support
• Regular progress updates sent to primary care provider
• Worked with primary care provider to stop/ reduce several supplements
Patient outcomes
• Oxazepam stopped after 5 month taper, now starting acetaminophen-oxycocet taper
• Patient reports she is a new person: motivated, increased energy and mental clarity
• Reduced pill burdenCase 1
• 76 year old female living alone
• Multiple comorbidities including hemodialysis 3x/wk, carpal tunnel syndrome, osteoarthritis, insomnia
• Medications blister packed, regimen is QID
• Personal support worker (PSW) 14hr/wk
• Referral for medication adherence concerns (tablets on the floor, ‘stashes’ of loose tablets in containers, blister packs not finished)
Case 2
Photo by Jorge Fernández on Unsplash
Interventions
• Identified cause of adherence issues
• Trialed medication reminder device
• Worked with dialysis unit to reduce pill burden, provide updates on prn pain medication usage
• Worked with community pharmacy to pick up unused medication, simplify medication regimen in blister pack
• Joint home visit with PSW supervisor to develop care plan to assist client with blister pack
Patient outcomes
• Reduced pill burden
• Significantly improved medication adherence
• Maintained a level of independence with medication administrationCase 2
1. What medication-related issues would you like addressed so that you have time to more efficiently manage your patients?
2. Based on the potential service offerings we described…• Are there any that are more or less
appealing to you? Why?
3. With a patient in mind…• What information, resources, or
processes would you need to experience a seamless referral for SCOPE Pharmacy services?
Breakout Session
RAC for Low Back Pain
1. Do you anticipate any push back from patients
when recommending that they be referred to this
program vs. directly for imaging/surgical consult? If
so, what would you need to support that
discussion?
2. What are the most important facts about the RAC
LBP program that should be highlighted when
informing and engaging primary care? Was there
any information that was lacking from this
presentation that you would have found more
helpful?
3. What would you find helpful to support a discussion
on RAC LBP with your colleagues? (e.g. one-pager, a
pamphlet, link to a website, FAQs, etc.)
43
1. What medication-related issues would you like
addressed so that you have time to more
efficiently manage your patients?
2. Based on the potential service offerings we
described, are there any that are more or less
appealing to you? Why?
3. With a patient in mind, what information,
resources, or processes would you need to
experience a seamless referral for SCOPE
Pharmacy services?
Pharmacy Consultation
Breakout Session
Project Background
• The Specialists and Community Services Directory was created as a centralized and sustainable online directory to support PCPs in finding regularly updated and complete information on specialists and community services in the Toronto Central LHIN.
• The Directory went live on June 29, 2018, and is accessible by an early adopter group of 25 primary care providers and existing OTNHub members.
• Data Sources:
Data Provider Type of Data
eHealth Ontario’s Provincial Provider Registry (PPR)Specialists Data
Hospital data exports (CMaRS extracts)
Thehealthline.ca Information Network Community Services Data
What have we done since going live?1. Evaluate the Directory based on Early Adopters’ feedback and use outcomes to inform next steps2. Continue to enhance the Directory based on user feedback (e.g. data quality, usability)
45
7%
86%
7%
Neutral
Somewhat Useful or Very Useful
Somewhat Not Useful
Yes No
Recommend Directory to Colleagues
72%
7%
21%
Satisfied
Somewhat dissatisfied
Neutral
Overall Directory Satisfaction
Evaluation Outcome
To assess usability and readiness of the Directory for broader use
Goal
Survey Completion Rate
87% 80%
Usefulness of Information in the Directory
46
Early Feedback from Early Adopters
“It works well. Great job!”
“This is exciting!”
“The directory is intuitive and the community service section is good.”
“I think this is a great start. It will become more and more useful as extra providers are added”
“This is a great start; data accuracy will be key.”
“I think that word will spread as this is a very useful too that is much needed.”
“I like the layout, and navigation is straightforward.”
“Finally a team got it right and best piece of software I’ve seen delivered.”
# Early Adopters Feedback Category
1 Expand specialists and community services data beyond Toronto Central LHIN
Data Quality
2 Provide more accurate wait times information for all specialists
3 Obtain more fulsome contact information
4 Reduce duplication of specialties under guided search (e.g. hematology vs. haematology, pediatric vs paediatric, etc.)
5 Enable a more streamlined login and access (e.g. too many clicks to login)
Usability
6 Allow user to filter based on proximity/distance to an address for specialist search
7 Improve sorting of specialist profiles (e.g. alphabetically, wait times, etc.)
8 Default the type of service offered in guided search to “Office Referrals”
9 Integrate with other systems (e.g. EMR, referral system)
10 Enable directory to view location in Google Maps in a separate tab
11 Improve clarity of typeface (e.g. use more contrasting color)
Table below captures improvements or enhancements suggested by early adopters during evaluation.
Feedback on Improvements
48
1. Would you use the Directory in your daily practice?
2. Would you recommend the use of the Directory to your colleagues in its current state, knowing that it will continue to improve in terms of usability and data quality?
Discussion
50
Focus on improving quality of data in the Directory and preparing for the public view
Strategize on communicating the Directory to broader PCP group
Next Steps
51
Big White Wall and BounceBack: Free psychotherapy services for adults and youth with mild to moderate depression and anxiety
Hannah MatthewsCanadian Mental Health AssociationOctober 2018
Funded by the Government of Ontario
Meet Sarah
• 30-year-old new mom• Has difficulty coping with motherhood• Reports sadness, low energy, anxiety, sleeping
problems to primary care provider at checkup• Is diagnosed with mild to moderate
depression• Is prescribed cognitive behavioural therapy
(CBT) without medication• Incurs long wait time to access in-person
counselling
Sound familiar?
These two self-help psychotherapy services are available now
Big White Wall (adults and youth 16+), an online peer support and self-management tool, coordinated by the Ontario Telemedicine Network (OTN) *Service available in English only
BounceBack® (adults and youth 15+), a telephone coaching program, managed by the Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA) Ontario and CMHA York and South Simcoe
Client considerations forself-help psychotherapy services
• Client’s age• Level of depression or anxiety (must be in the
mild to moderate range)• Therapeutic treatment options• Client’s motivation level• Client’s profile
BounceBack:Background
• Developed by Dr. Chris Williams, a psychiatrist at the University of Glasgow in Scotland
• First adopted by CMHA British Columbia in 2008. Since then, more than 40,000 clients have been referred
• Two years ago, CMHA York and South Simcoe piloted the program in Ontario, with funding from the Central LHIN
• In October 2017, as part of the Government of Ontario’s investment in psychotherapy services, BounceBack was launched across Ontario
Developed by Dr. Chris Williams, psychiatrist, expert in cognitive behavioural therapy,Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Glasgow.
BounceBack:The approach
BounceBack:Offers two types of help
BounceBack telephone coaching and workbooks (referral required)
BounceBack Today online videos (no referral required)
1
2
BounceBack:Telephone coaching & workbooks
Telephone coaching using skill-building workbooks:
• Referral is primarily by family doctor, nurse practitioner, or psychiatrist
• Clients can also self-refer• Clients are called within 5 business days of referral being
submitted• Coaches conduct 3-6 sessions with clients using workbooks
chosen collaboratively and based on clients’ current needs• Popular workbooks: Being assertive; Changing extreme and
unhelpful thinking; Overcoming sleep problems• Coaching is available in more than 15 languages
BounceBack:Telephone coaching & workbooks
• Coaches are not counsellors, but trained in educational and motivational coaching
• Coaches assist clients with skill development, provide motivation, and monitor progress
• Coaches are overseen by clinical psychologists• Coaches assess and monitor clients for risk of harming themselves or
others on every call• Primary care providers are clinically responsible for client care and are
kept informed of client progress
Initial Contact(within 5 business days of referral)
Session 1 Assessme
nt(within 2 weeks of
initial contact)
Close case, post-program scores, letters sent to participant and referrer (30 min)
Session 2(2-3 weeks
from S1)
Sessions3-6
(2-3 weeks between sessions)
Completion Session
(2-3 weeks from final session)
Booster Session
(within 6 months of completio
n)
Further support, reinforce skills (15-30 min)
Coaching, send next workbook(s) (15-20 min)
Coaching, send next workbook(s) (15-20 min)
Eligibility assessment & pre-program scores + send initial package including introductory workbooks or short format booklets & a short letter to referrer (45 min)
Establish contact & confirm contact details (If unreachable, letters sent to referrer and client)
BounceBack:Client journey
BounceBack:Online videos
BounceBack Today online video series:
• Offers practical tips on managing mood, sleeping better, building confidence, increasing activity, problem solving, healthy living
• Available in English, French, Mandarin, Cantonese, Punjabi, Arabic, and Farsi
Watch videos at:bouncebackvideo.ca(access code: bbtodayon)
BounceBack:Evidence-based benefits
Pilot program in CMHA York and South Simcoe with 461 clients who completed the program from August 2015 to December 2017 showed coaching-program effectiveness:
Depression and anxiety
decreased by almost 40%
11.610.6
7.2 6.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Pre-BounceBack Post-BounceBack
Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ-9; depressive mood)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder(GAD-7; assessment scale)
BounceBack:Benefits
Satisfaction survey conducted by CMHA York and South Simcoe with119 clients who completed BounceBack showed:
would recommend BounceBack to a friend or family member
92%found the CBT workbooks easy to read and helpful
94%liked receiving the service by telephone
95%
Referral form can be accessed or submitted online at: bouncebackontario.ca
Suitable for clients:• 15 years or older• With mild to moderate depression (PHQ-9) score
between 0-21 (with or without anxiety)• Not at risk to harm self or others• Not significantly misusing alcohol or drugs• With no personality disorder and no psychosis or manic
episodes within the past 6 months• With sufficient concentration and motivation to
engage in the program
For telephone coaching + workbooks (referral required)For online videos (referral not required)
BounceBack:How to refer
BounceBack:Who to contact
For more information on BounceBack or to access the referral form or resource materials:Visit: bouncebackontario.ca
Questions about telephone coaching or referral form:Contact BounceBack team at: 1 (866) 345-0224
Questions related to marketing opportunities:[email protected]
Big White Wall: Origins
• Developed in the UK in 2007 by Psychiatrist Dr. Jenn Hyatt• Since 2007 has been offered in UK, USA, New Zealand and Canada (Ontario)• Over 60,000 members since 2007• Supported by multiple clinical trials, peer review journals and user survey results• Numerous awards including finalist in innovation mental health and best European
Union eHealth solution 2014
Big White Wall: Meaning
• “Big” recognizes the infinite nature of human
emotion;
• “White” conveys the blank canvas that the site
provides members to express themselves;
• “Wall” symbolizes shelter and support, as well as the
barriers we sometimes need to break through to
improve emotional health.
Big White Wall: What is it?
Self–register and Interact with a supportive
community where everyone’s voice counts
Freely express your thoughts and feelings with
unique creative outlets
Learn from smart programs and useful resources
that help you understand and feel more confident
Feel secure in an anonymous space where your
identity is completely private
Paid for by the Government of Ontario and
moderated 24/7 by mental health
professionals who ensure that members are
safe. Also supported by clinical analytics
Big White Wall is a 24/7 anonymous online
mental health service for mild to moderate
anxiety, depression and other related conditions
Big White Wall: Proven Effectiveness
Study conducted by Big White Wall revealed:
of clients saw improvement in at least one aspect of their well-being
70% 1 in 2clients reported sharing an issue for the first time
35%of clients experienced mental health-related absence from work; 51% of those clients reported that using Big White Wall reduced their time away from work
Big White Wall: Proven effectiveness
Clinical research study led by Women’s College Institute for Health Sciences and Virtual Care (WIHV) included participants from Lakeridge Health, the Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, and Women’s College Hospital revealed in some users who were consistent in using the solution:
A decrease in levels of reported depression and anxiety
An increase in perceived mental health recovery, which includes self-rated ability to self-manage
Client Consideration for Suitability
• 16 years and older with mild to moderate depression and anxiety
• low risk of suicidal ideations or self-harm
• Basic level of literacy and comprehension
• Access to a phone or computer with Internet
• Support clinicians/counsellors as an adjunct to face-to-face individual therapy
• Use as a bridge for wait times
• Clients looking for after-hours mental health support
• Newly Diagnosed Clients seeking support from a non-judgmental anonymous community
How to Refer
• Low staff intensity - provide leaflets & wallet cards to clients. Posters also available
• Clients self-register by visiting www.bigwhitewall.ca (enter email, user name and password)
• Any questions clients can email [email protected].
• Staff are not expected to deal with any questions related to sign up and use of BWW
Big White Wall: Who to contact
For more information on Big White Wall or to request resource materials:Email: [email protected]
Questions related to presenter opportunities:Contact Harriet Ekperigin at [email protected]