SCIA Engineer Downloads - Data stored in this version can ...€¦ · The partially exported IFC file can be opened and imported again in Scia Engineer. There it will give a message:

Data stored in this version can be opened in version 15.1.100 (Release 15.1) and higher.

Ticket number(s)

Bug Description Solution

NNLL-9WAAMS

POD: Internal forces diagram on sections is not continuous. Please explain what is the reason for not continuous diagram of internal forces on section SE5 on attached project. Deformations seem OK, but internal forces a bit weird. Is it beacuse of the different slope of the neighbouring slabs? See attached pdf files that describe the problem too.

KIK: There is problem in modification of slabs with variable thickness. This problem is defined in new bug "OKIA-9WHFYB". Solution for user is the following : In her previous bug "JPO15-1019VDJTH" I prepare her corrected esa model. So she can use it , don't touch to geometry and only change loads.

IBES-9VKAQ3 Print-picture - templates listbox is empty Solved in Deve_04. Will be in next Patch

ISCS-9VTDQA When you want to print a picture, the names of the templates are not visible (see print screen). Tested in 15.0.115

Solved in Deve_04

NNLL-9W2KPS

client cannot export to IFC. (tested in 15.0.120 and in v15.1.13) File with problem is in attachment. If you chose 'File -> Export -> IFC 2x3', then it can export a first part of the file, after which is crashes.... The partially exported IFC file can be opened and imported again in Scia Engineer. There it will give a message: "1D member (S73) being modified contains some internal components which will become incorrect. The modification can not be performed." How can we export this model to a IFC file?

Export is already fixed in Deve 23, i.e. it will be in R 15.1. Solution for user - export of structure without reinforcement

HBAI-9VMK6U

Print picture dialogue - missing texts Solved in Deve_04

NNLL-9VZHCU

Empty klist of drawing templates Solved in 15.1

NNLL-9VGC8Z Maximum unity check is not based on any partial check in the detailed output. Please review steel code check of member B23 on attached project (soppalchi-FG2-03.esa) in version 14.0 and 15.0. Although the maximal unity check in detailed output is 0,90 in both cases, new version show graphically and numerically that the member does not satisfy and the UC is 1,05.

14/04 PVT: Fixed in DEVE 11 build 15.111.32Shear buckling was not limiting in this case due to low slenderness however the check was still executed in the background.Duplicate

Ticket number(s)


Could you explain why? issue, see bug CSC15-1069VJFMH17/04 PVT: Verified in R15.0 build 15.0.106

NNLL-9WBE8W

Crash in Scia Engineer The problem is (as in the second bug from this user) caused by drawing of dimension line. We will improve the source code to be more robust. If the problem persists user can try to delete line grid and create it again.

NNLL-9Y8LHE Two pictures attached. If we go in autodesign on marked button to chose a new css the buckling-curves are selected and not chosen.

15/07 PVT: Hi Cornelius, this has already been fixed, please check the latest R15.1

NNLL-9X4KRL Crash of SEn when exporting the model to IFC, including 1D reinforcement. If you untick 1D reinforcement, export is successfull. See attached crash reports from user's and my PC. Tested in 15.0.1019

already fixed in R15.1 (could be tested on 15.1.55 and newer)

NNLL-9VJJ55 Issue (both in 15.0.100 & 15.1.13) In Scia Engineer, use right mouse button --> Print Image. Problem = you can not see the templates. But they are there, since you can select them. See the images for clarification.

Solved in 15.1

NNLL-9W8CMM

Mistake in section RRO 80x40x4mm in SCIA 2014 Libraries Me and my colleagues find out that there is a mistaken section in the Library family RRO ( German rectangular sections). It is a hollow section RRO 80/40/4mm. The error is in the wrong self-weight calculation and the percentage of error is exactly 10 times higher load!!! We checked other sections from the same library but for luck the checked sections are ok! The question is does any other profile section has the same huge error. Please give us a response to these questions sooner because we are doing thousands of square

07/05 PVT: Duplicate bug: GVA15-1299W8G83Fixed in R15.1.47

Ticket number(s)


meters steel structures and if the mistake is real than it is done a serious mistake!!! I am sending screen shots of the wrong section and another with the proper weight dimensions. In addition I made a user section from the "geometric section" the weight is what it should be. RRO 80/40/4mm RRO 80/40/3.6mm Geometric hollow section 80/40/4mm It was tested: 14.0.1043, 15.0.120, 15.1.13

NNLL-9VTFS5 If I do reinforcement design on 2D members with activity I see different extreme in a scale of modelling window and in the Report preview. The reason is that preview show extreme of all members not only active ones. I have to switch selection to "current" and select all active members so that the graphical scale corresponds to table output. Is this required feature or a bug? User thinks the latter. Tested in 15.0.115, pictures attached, project D1_3_hotline (rep) activity.esa saved on \\ftp-prague\ftp_f\Programator\TUM\.

Problem solved in 15.1

NNLL-9WF9US

Crash during closing of Scia Engineer Most probably solved in Deve_10. Fix will eb available most probably in R15.2

JBES-9Y7FXT 1. Open project in attachment 2. Calculate and select N3. 3. Select the result as shown in the image "Preview new version of Scia Engine..." and check the preview (you must use the old preview, since the new preview does not show anything at all in the 15.0 and 15.1.84) --> The preview is completely different from what it should be (see image "Preview old version Scia Engineer... ")

Duplicite bug. Solved in R15.1

JPOL-9UPEVU When I press F1 button while the focus is in Property window, webhelp is open twice. One page refers to Property window and the second one to home page of the web help. For example: http://help.nemetschek-scia.com/15.0/cs/#RB/Basics/Property_window.htm

Approved in 15.1.56

Ticket number(s)


http://help.nemetschek-scia.com/15.0/cs/ Never mind what exactly is the content of Property window. It does not happen if the focus is in the main tree. Teste in 15.0.35

JPOL-9WVBKX

Translation issues - only English appears: 1. Not translated values in the Property window of new concrete check (please see attached picture). Please correct "unity_check" and "detailed" strings. 2. The same applies to new composite checks. Another picture attached. Please translate also "table" type of output. 2. Not translated modules names in Protection setup for composites - see picture as well. Please translate the one for EN at least. 4. All new checks captions are in English only - Check capacity-response, Check capacity-interaction diagram, Check shear+torsion (ULS), Check Stress limitation, Check crack width (SLS), Check Detailing provisions, Composite Beam - Construction stage, Composite Beam - Final stage. Also design output starts with English title: Overall Design (ULS), Slenderness(Design), Internal forces (Design). This remains problematic since the first patch of SEn 15 and even the third patch did not corrected this! Tested in 15.0.1019

All issues are known and handled in other DevTrack documents

NNLL-9VVCL8 Capacity check and combinator strategy Setting Brute force (slow), very strange name for users, gives worse checks than strain strategy. Is it OK?

Duplicate problem see bug JPO15-1219VZBSN

CSCT-9WBGBD

Attached a picture. The description of the print-templates are empty (only yellow) in direct-print. Already solved, Will be available as a hotfix of 15.0

EHOU-9TVKPJ For line load on edge the option System doesn't change anything. It's always according to GCS. See image in attachment. Is this a bug or am I misunderstanding how this kind of load works?

fixed in R15.1 (tested on 15.1.56)

JPOL-9W2GWX

Issues with solver. Please see attached picture with error message saying that file NEPR1464.DLL was not found. The

It is fixed in setup 15.0.120. It is caused by incorrect installation of vcredist_x86.exe

Ticket number(s)


file exists in Program Files, as user stated. This problem was reported by two users today. There is a workaround to rename solver64.exe and use 32bit solver instead. However, could you find the source of problem here?

NNLL-9WQJW7

Question: Scia Engineer crashes during closing of the program Can you have a look at the attached crash reports? Scia Engineer crashed by the user while he was closing Scia Engineer, meaning that the filel were not saved.

Problem solved. Fix will be available in R15.1

CSCT-9XYCSH Attached project with document (fire-resistance). If we use the cut in the beam we get 58% check and see 104% stability in documentation. With no cut used -> no stability-check. What´s correct?

30/06 PVT: Hi Cornelius, I believe this is a duplicate issue related to the LTB Check using DIN NA.This was already fixed based on a previous ticket. See the PDF export in attachment, I get 1,04 in both runs.

NNLL-9WVG7U

Series of crash reports from a user with Tryout licence. He says the problems comse when he tries to print out, wihtout regards to particular project. Please investigate attached error reports and give the prospect some hint how to proceed with evaluation of his tryout version.

First crash report does not provide understandable information. Remaining crash reports shows that the problem was initiated in Windows accessibility. Try to disable it or disable the Touchpad. problem is already solved in R_15.1.53

JPOL-9WGCCD

Autodesign of timber cssdoes not calcualte css characteristics completely. If you open attached project, go to Timber service and run autodesign for css "VAZNICE NAD SLOUPY" which is originally 240x120 mm, you can see that for some widths (130, 140, 150 mm) the unity check is 999 (see picture). The reason is that (if you take a look into css library afterwards) some important css characteristics are zero, even though FEM method is ticked, and therefore there is zero Mcr. If you update the css everything works fine. Could you ensure that also css characteristics calculated by autodesign gives all necessary values? Tested in 15.0.120

27/05 PVT: Solved in DEVE 11 build 15.111.48 and verified in R15.1.58This issue was caused by incorrect cross-section values in the 2D FEM cache. The cache within this project contained zero values. Clearing the cache solves the issue.A test was now added to ignore the cache in case zero values are found.

NNLL-9VSB44 Question: attached project keeps crashing Not sure if you are the responsible on, if not, please forward this ticket.

It was some specific problem of generated free loads. It is fixed in 15.1.55

Ticket number(s)


The project attached keeps crashing randomly on the users machine. I was able to reproduce some crashes on my machine. One while deleting some elements, one while closing the composite menu (both crash reports are attached). Deleting the temp folder and exporting the project to a new esa file is no solution. Can you have a look at the reports to see why this file keeps crashing?

DPIS-9TEKDR Issue: wrong results for subregions See simple test project attached. This is a concrete wall with a steel subregion in it. By looking at the results for the material steel, there are no results. By looking at the results for the concrete mateial, the results for the complete wall are shown (also for the steel subregion). So it seems that changing the material for a subregion only has an influence for the stiffness calculation of the stucture? Can this be changed in the future?


NNLL-9VYHPZ Crash when using disconnect Regular crash of Scia15 I am trying to unjoin/disconnect all nodes and crashes. Please do respond in a sort time cause I have to meet tommorows deadline.


HBAI-9WAJZP Client doesn't see his pictures in his picture gallery Solved. there was missing cache with picture names. the source code was improved to generate names in case the cache is missing.Solved in 15.2

YFRN-9UHCSA

Attached is a model which is giving an error message in the linear calculation: "Incorrect load direction! Member No. B14"., I have noticed that a thermal load is defined on this member, which is the cause of this error. But why do we receive this error?

thermal load is disabled for Grid XY since R15.1 (tested on 15.1.56)

NWEB- Shear due to torsion check according to BS code seems to be failed but the result is "pass". Please 08/06 PVT: Solved in DEVE 26 WLE build

Ticket number(s)


9NFANG see steel code ULS check on beam 4 for class "All ULS". Shear due to torsion has got 0,7 MPa applied but 0,21 MPa is the capacity. However, the utilisation is 0,00. See attached picture too. How is the utilisation calculated? And how is the shear due to torsion value calculated? Tested in 14.0.1043

13.026.32 and verified in R15.1 build 15.1.70An issue was fixed in a unit conversion on the output for the shear due to torsion capacity. This capacity is 207 MPa instead of 0,207 MPa. This is also the reason why the unity check is almost zero.

JBES-9HYKC3 Issue/Question: The user can't make dimension lines anymore with the current set of licenses. But before version 2013, he could do that with this set of licenses (see modules below, key 551467) => question = what license is necessaire now? Maybe esa.07

ESADT.01-Steel overview drawings, ESA.00.500-Base modeller limited to 500 beams, ESA.00.200-Base modeller limited to 200 beams, ESA.06-Productivity toolbox, It is and has always been in esa.66 / no change done. Maybe sth else has changed?

NWEB-9MCCZZ

generating loads on load panels In the attached project, there are many load panels, for which the loads will not be generated. Only a few will be generated, and thus the loads in total on the construction are not correct. Check e.g. the load panels LP386 and LP387. Why can't the loads on this panels be generated? I have tried to change the properties of the load panels (max angle for transfer, selection type, ....), nothing seems to help. Tested this in Scia Engineer 14.0.1039 for load case LC6.

Fixed in R15.1 (tested on 15.1.79), Disconnect all, remove ionternal edges, run check structure data, connect again. Then all load is properly generated, or at least I did not found any panel which is loaded and does not generate load

NWEB-9MT5TE

2DLCS: load panel LCS type Issue: Open project in attachment. In one of my models I’ve set the load panel LCS type to be ‘perpendicular to vector’. The load distribution arrow rotates to the intended direction, but when the loads are generated the line loads appear on the wrong set of beams –


Ticket number(s)


as if the load distribution were set to be in the orthogonal direction – see screen snapshot in word document. This seems to happen when I use any LCS type other than ‘standard’ – the same thing happens for ‘congruent with vector’ etc. It works correctly when LCS type is set to standard.

LSKI-9LPBLS Using CDD calculation deformation on beam is not the same as for the slab Total deflection on beam is only 2mm when it is 39.5mm on the slab at the same location. How to explain it ?

DLO:solution : go to project data, activate nonlinearity -> close project data. Delete all non linear combination -> project data disable nonlinearity -> cleaner. after all steps it works

NNLL-9WQE6V

Error when deployng SCIA Engineer silent install provisioned with Microsoft SCCM The problem is that wrong paths are created in the registry when installing under SYSTEM account. This will be fixed in new setup of 15.1 (15.1.59 or later). As a workaround, delete registry keys HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\SCIA and HKEY_USERS\.DEFAULT\Software\SCIA to prevent recreating wrong registry entries during startup.

NNLL-9UYKCG

Steel: Different UC values between Brief/Detailed when using LTBII 13/04 PVT: Solved in DEVE 11 build 15.111.30The difference in results was caused by an issue in the mapping of combinations to the FriLo BTII solver.24/04 PVT: verified in R15.1.27

JPOL-9UAEL6 Deformations on slab S65 seems to be so that supports in two nodes are not taken into account. If you take a look at deformation of S65, it seems that supports (either by columns B64 and B65 or nodal supprots Sn66, Sn67) are not taken into account. However, everything seem to be correctly connected. If you delete subregions R12 and R15 is looks OK.

Solved in 15.2

Ticket number(s)


Tested in 15.0.35

RCCA-9W8QWU

Issue: Missing connection Question: The client created a model in the Scia Engineer 14 where the connections are OK (Picture 1) So, he saved the model in version 15 and, now, when he tries to do the connection, scia delete 4 connections (Picture 2 and 3) and mesh gets discontinuous (Picture 4). I looked for some problem in the model (in attachment) but I found nothing. Why is it happening?


NNLL-9UKDEN

User complains that mobile load template UIC 71 has got wrong definition, compared to Eurocode. The distance between the edge linear load and the neighbouring point load is 1,2m but should be 0,8m. We know that this is editable but only with esas.36 module (which is not available for this particular user) because otherwise there is only one tab of parameters for mobile load in a library and this distance can be changed in the second tab of parameters only.

Solved in rev95970 in deve09

NNLL-9UJ9UA CDD results of project in attachment do not seem ok. Description with images is in word file. The deformations do not make sense at all. Look at CDD results for beam B89 for example. And CDD deformations can also not be shown for all plates.

DLO:: go to project data, activate nonlinearity -> close project data. Delete all non linear combination -> project data disable nonlinearity -> cleaner. after all steps it works

NNLL-9VQ74L Bug in Scia Engineer 2015 There is a little bug in SCIA Engineer 2015 we discovered today. The bug is in the “Member properties” -> “Table edit geometry” sub-menu. When we want to copy and paste one of our coordinate numbers with the “Ctrl+C” shortcut, the “COPY MEMBER” shortcut command is activated in background. Please see attached screenshot.


Ticket number(s)


NNLL-9UKFDU

Tested in SEN 15.0.50 Please look at the file 2DFEM_PVT.esa in attachment. Cross-section poteau8 was calculated in a 2D environment using 2D FEM Cross-section poteau9 was calculated in a 3D environment using 2D FEM => As the screenshots show, the values are the same but they have been switched between 2D and 3D. When I calculate 3D without 2D FEM I get roughly the same results. => The 3D values for 2D FEM are correct. => It seems for both 2D and 3D environments, FEMco always calculates according to the principal axis however in 2D and incorrect axis switch occurs.

17/03 PVT: Solved in DEVE 11 build 15.111.03 and verified in P build 15.198.12In this specific case, since the user inputted the cross-section in a 2D environment, there is no rotation of the principal axis.The 2D FEM analysis however always calculates according to the principal axis system. Due to the discrepancy between the systems the results of 2D FEM got switched.This issue itself has been fixed i.e. this kind of switch will not happen anymore in a 2D environment, however it's important to note that the user should model such sections in a 3D environment (since for example buckling will occur around the weak principal axis and not the LCS axis).

NNLL-9VVGK4

Steel EC-EN: 999 check for NUM section in Tension + Bending The check for S11 for Class RC1 gives 999. The cross-section concerns a numerical section. The Detailed output does not show the 999 value so this result is unexpected. I noticed two issues: 1) The combined bending and tension stability check shows Wel,z,com = 0 mm^3 This will be caused by the NUM setcion which doesn't have fibres. For a NUM section this should be taken as Wel,z of the cross-section. 2) The Summary output shows "Compression + Moment" has a check of 999 This is unexpected, I would expect "Tension + Moment" there.

07/05 PVT: Fixed in DEVE 11 build 15.111.45 and verified in R15.1.47The issue was caused by the usage of a Numerical cross-section in the combined Tension & Bending stability check.This check requires Wel,z,com at the compressed fibre, however a NUM section has no fibres. This has been corrected and for NUM sections Wel,z is now used.

JTRK-9VCSXJ Wrong topology on element S14 Please identify the problem why mesh cannot be generated on S14 (as the error message at the beginning of analysis says). Because when I delete all other elements and keep S14 only, mesh can be generated and structure (if correctly supported) calculated. Tested in 15.0.60

It is a problem of intersections which is fixed in R15(tested on 15.0.97). Please remove all intersections and internal edges (I recommend to remove also solver temporary files with Cleaner) and connect again, then the mesh can be generated.

CSCT-9U9JXB The surface of S9 jumps from top to buttom because of an intersection ES31. Why? fixed in R15.1 (tested on 15.1.56)

Ticket number(s)


GVAN-9W2DET

1) Client wants to do a check of crack width in concrete 15 for non linear combinations, but you will get an error message about the Scia Design Forms in the preview window. So it is not possible to do checks for nonlinear combinations in the new concrete? 2) When doing than the check of crack width for linear combinations (for example Class RC4), you will get a weird result (see print screen controle_scheurwijdte). The max moments are not in this place? Also, when I compare it for the same class in the old concrete, you will get a very different result.

Fixed in R15.1.51

NNLL-9W77W8

input of end plate in a connection -> there is an error-message when inputting negative values for left and right (thus making an endplate which has a lesser width than your profile).

Fixed and tested with 15.111.52 & 15.1.58..

NNLL-9W3FDM

Error message "Enter a number" appears 6 times when asking for the results. Also Sj,ini and Sj show -1,#INDe+00 as value. When reducing the diameter and putting 2 anchor rows under the hanch, then this error dissappear and we see values for Sj,ini and Sj. What is wrong here ?

Fixed and verified with 15.111.45 & 15.1.47.

NNLL-9W3E6X

The check for shear and torsion in the new concrete menu is very unclear. The check cannot be performed because an equilibrium of forces cannot be found, but it gives zero for almost all internal checks. You can find the image, brief, standard and detailled output in the pdf in attachment. Project is also in attachment.

Fixed in R 15.1. (build 15.1.51)

NNLL-9VJGK6 Attached project and two checks from 14.1 and 15.0 I think the main difference is the critical section position. Why? So we don´t understand the jump to 118%.

17/04 PVT: Fixed in DEVE 11 build 15.111.3520/04 PVT: Fixed also in R15.0 build 15.0.116

JPOL-9TNJMF Internal forces on integration strips are zero, except the ned section. Could you please open attached project and check why internal forces on integration strips (preciselly CM49 and CM50) are zero (except the end sections, see attached picture). Internal forces on slabs are nonzero, as well as internal force on section identical to the integration strip. Therefore I see no reason for such a weird results on integration strip. Note that this project was created and can be calcualted in 2013.1 only. The same problems with results appear in 14.0 and 14.1 but the analysis here is not successfull (due

Problem solved in15.1

Ticket number(s)


to wrong topology of 2D macro). By the way - if you take the project, go to results, and try to dislay internal forces on strip CM50 for combination STR_6.10A_01 and switch between N, V and M, it takes about 40-45 seconds to refresh the screen BUT about 2,5 minutes to refresh Report preview!! Tested in 14.1.85

JPOL-9TWEY3 Please test attached project in R15 version. It tooks enormous time to deal with calculation preparation. If you start with linear analysis, SEn gives you a message about problematic load panels (loads cannot be generated on LP27,...., see picture attached) after about 9 minutes! Whether you decide to continue with calculation or not (there no possibility to make a choice, other than killing the program in task manager) SEn proceeds and after about 17 minutes you receive another error message (about masses generated from loads). Again, you cannot choose other posibility than continue with analysis. And after about 38 minutes (from start) you get a message about singular matrix and calculation is aborted. So you loose more than half an hour without any possibility to escape and without any result. Although is it "only" time consuming I put here high priority due to the fact that such a problem makes our software almost useless for user. Could you find any reason or speed up the process?

Fixed in R15.1 (tested on 15.1.88). The first message says that LP85 has incorrect geometry - it is necessary to fix (remove the panel). Then only one message about masses which could not be generated is shown. It takes still lot of time but it would be fixed if Scia Engineer is 64bit application.

NNLL-9WVJXY

1D Reinforcement 15.0 - empty output for user created NAD The user created his National Annex for Italy. If I run the reinforcement calculation with standard annex, then I get the full output, but if I load the user defined National Annex, then the full output of 1D reinforcement is empty. The reinforcement will be calculated, but the output not. There is a simple example with only one column.

DLO: Fixed in R 15.1(15.1.63)

NNLL-9UBFSC Missing Reinforcement and Stress Fixed verified in R 15.1.72

JKÜZ-9U8HT6 Attached project, pdf and rtf export. The orientation of rtf-export jumps to the right and gives scale-problems if there is no free space around. Problem only with rotated pictures.

Solved in Deve_04

NNLL-9WDBSM

Steel: Stability Check not accounted for in overal UC For beam B19 we get check of 37%, but we see in report or preview a stability-check of 42%. Why

27/05 PVT: Solved in R15.1.47The maximal stability check is now correctly listed. This was

Ticket number(s)


it´s listed?. caused by the fact that the 'Rolled & equivalent welded' case in LTB was set for a cross-section which can only be checked by the 'General' case (rectangle).

NWEB-9PPDSJ

solver crash / inexplicable singularity Issue: See simplified model in attachment. It crashes on non-linear calculation. But (non-linear) stability calculation indicates that stability should not be a problem. It's the same project as send by Gino & Stephane, but simplified (1 non-lin. combination). Can you check the reason for the instability in the non-linear calculation? It should not be instable, since stability calculation gives no problems.

There was a bug in nonlinear stability - those high numbers for critical load coefficient didn't make sence. It is fixed in the last version we sent on friday (24.4.). So the problem is still the same (critical load coefficient smaller than 1). And a solution is still the same - increasing the cross sections of some beams due to too big axial force, which is just a bit above the critical force. In the last simplified example it is the cross section "Afstandhouder vervangen" - increase it to 22mm, then the nonlinear calculation runs just fine.; Petra

NNLL-9U2J4N This makes it hard for the user to apply changes because every time he wants to apply a change he has to wait some minutes. See the description in attachment with also the test-file.

The regeneration in this case necessary abnd must be performed. The question was useless in this case and therefore we have now hiden it. (fixed in 15.2)

NNLL-9UYA8M

Bug: specification for variable load case is not filled in automatically. Please see the video attached. This video is created by one of our users. If you create a load case and change the type from "self weigt" to "standard". And next you create a new load case, variable one, the specification is empty. So far I can reproduce the problem in Scia Engineer 14, Scia Engineer 14.1 and Scia Engineer 15. However if I follow the same steps in Scia Engineer 2013.1, than this problem does not occur. Si in previous version, the specification was filled in autotically. Is there a reason that this is no longer the case since Scia Engineer 14? Next because of this "empty specification", the user can only insert a line "snow" load in this load


Ticket number(s)


case (see the user video). This problem I cannot reproduce. How can this be solved?

NNLL-9VM935

The regular crash of file in attachments during opening It was tested: Scia Engineer 14.0.1058 and 15.0.115 The first crash of file was using load panel according to user.

opeing od project is fixed in R15.1 (tested on 15.1.56)POL:Beams B1 and B254 are corrupt. Program is modified so that it does not crash on such corrupt data. Project with corrected data saved with 15.0 version is attached. The reason of corrupt data is unclear at this time.

NNLL-9VU6Q8

The problem with connections The description in attachments

Fixed and verified with 12.012.685 & 15.298.10.

NNLL-9SLKA6 Issue different Moment My results: A client has a model imported via IFC and gets dips in his My-momentdiagram of his roof rafters for instance in beam B38. Beam B83 & B86 are manually inputted in the model and these give correct My-momentdiagrams. What is causing these differences (dips) ? I assume the wall which is made in steel of 30cm (very high stiffnes) can have an influence but why doesn't this affect beam B83 & B86 (manually inputted, not from IFC). The users wants a momentdiagram as in beam B83 & B86 (=no moment transmission between rafter and wall). Could this be a bug in the IFC-import?

Fixed in R15.1 (tested on 15.1.33); before calculation please remove all mesh and solver temporary files (where the wrong results are saved)

NNLL-9VUKCH

Crash of SEn when selecting plane section. There is a regular crash of SEn if you open attached project and click on inputted plane section. Please see also attached crash reports and find the problem.

Solved in 15.1.55

NNLL-9U3EYN See crash report in attachment of the customer. When he tries to use the 3D wind generator on Scia Engineer 14.0.1058, it will crash. I do not have this problem.

We have tried to reproduce the issue by installing SCIA Engineer 14.0.1058, but there was no luck.From the XML file, it appears that, different versions of “Wind load Engine Dll (1.10.58 and 1.10.61 - Please refer to the attachment)” has been used in the system.As a workaround, if the user uninstall “WLE” and reinstalling it, could solve the problem.Please let us know, whether

Ticket number(s)


the workaround solves the issue.

NNLL-9VZCMG

Bug: In Scia Engineer 15.0.120 you cannot see the page-format when you want to print a picture directly from the model (see printscreen in attachment). There is a workaound for this at the moment (see attachment).

Solved in Deve_04

JPOL-9EZBHU Label of snow loads doesn't correspond to actual value and properties of other loads. Especially for snow - free plane load and point load in node display value 1000 times higher (although the calculation takes correct value displayed in properties), surface load on plane is correct, linear load displays 3 decimal digits instead of 2. See attached picture. Proof of the problem can be seen on attached project from the user as well (and the picture as well).

Fixed for input load. The generated one will be solved later

NNLL-9UYD28 It is necessary to run batch analysis with Linear and Nonlinear calculation at once Problem solved in 15.1.55

RCCA-9S3MQZ

GUI not trasnleted There is some problem with the translation of the member data for Steel and Concrete menu for Brazilian code (see pictures in attchment) They are not translated to Portuguese. I am using the version 14.1.93

Language setting is now sent to SDF dialogs.

RCCA-9W8SKR

bill of material by attributes Question: I was preparing a demo for a scaffolding prospect and I noticed the following issue: When I ask the bill of material by attributes in the Engineering Report, I have no table (picture 1). But if I ask it in the old document, I have the table (picture 2). So, for some reason, this table is not appearing in the Engineering Report. The model is in attachment.

Solved in 15.2

Ticket number(s)


NNLL-9VYBFC Scia 15 crashes when the project is exported to IFC crash fixed in R15.1 (tested on 15.1.56)

GVAN-9W8G7M

value for A is 10x too big for RRO 80x40x4 06/05 PVT: The area for the RRO 80x40x4 has been corrected in DEVE 11 and verified in R15.1.4707/05 PVT: Solved in DEVE 11 build 15.111.45

HBAI-9U4BW3

Bug: When a general cross-section is linked with negative value parameters: These negative values cannot be edited in the cross-section library (see print screen in attachment). The user receives the following error "Error, negative value". There is a workaround by editing the parameters in the cross-section editor. But it should also work in the cross-section dialog because these parameters can be edited for positive values.

07/05 PVT: Fixed in DEVE 11 build 15.111.45 and verified in R15.1.47When defining a parameter, please activate the 'Use range' setting and specify a minimum and maximum value. This minimum can be negative and will from then on allow the input of negative values from within the Cross-section Manager.

ISCS-9TUCAY New concrete: Preview of internal forces -> "from" FEM analysis instead of "form". Typo corrected in DEVE 06

ISCS-9TUMFJ New concrete: In the concrete design, "heigth" must be written as "height". Whole block with Input data is removed from actual form in DEVE06, necessary input data are in the header of calculation and they were duplicated.

ISCS-9VEGFJ .CLS files cannot be opened in Scia Design Forms 15 when using Windows Explorer or using the function in Scia Engineer "Open in the Script Editor". See error in attachment. Problem is solved when changing name of path in opening .CLS extensions.

MAL: Fixed in new 15.0.100 setup13/04 PVT: Note: The remaining issue related to the Program Files path is specified in bug ID PVTO-9VFJZD

ISCS-9VRKZA In attachment you can find some pdf's exported from New Concrete in Scia Engineer 15 with some corrections/improvements of Dutch translation.

Typos were corrected by DennisStiffness - corrected together with JBUK-9VRF85 and EHO15-1139VRH6KSlenderness - only typos - corrected by DennisInternal forces - corrected together with JBUK-9VREQ4Design - corrected together with JSTK-9VNHW8,

JBES-9VJFVK issue: In the setup for Scia Engineer 15.1, the word indicated in the red box, should be 'Locatie' in Fixed in 15.0.120

Ticket number(s)


Dutch.

JBES-9Y7FTE New preview does not show results. 1. Open project in attachment. 2. Select the middle node (N3) 3. Ask the results as shown in the image --> preview keeps being empty But if I would go to the old preview, then I would get a graph! (tested in 15.1.84 & 15.0.1019)

Missing graphs were inserted in TLX file. Solved in 15.1

EHOU-9VRBZT

Not translated text in the French preview in Concrete 15 See document in attachment.

Untranslated strings was set on translation

RMAA-9VRH7F

Open project Run linear calculation Try to display 3D stresss for LC1 --> crash

Solved in R_15.1

NNLL-9VEKNH

It takes a very long time (roughly 30 minutes) to generate the mesh for the model in attachment., I found that the problem is due to the elastic mesh., When you would deselect it, the model runs in a normal behaviour., What is happening and is there a way to improve it?


NNLL-9W9AVZ

Automatic reinforcement design according to BS code gives only error. Please see attached project and explain why can't we use AMRD for the one and only column. Standard reinforcement design (for LC2) gives As,req=517mm2. But AMRD does not work under any circumstances. Allthe time we receive E823 - see attached picture.

Solved in 15.1.61, See my remarks in doc

JPOL-9J3BXU Installation of Scia Engineer 14 doesn't set paths to pictures and drawings templates correctly. I have installed R14.0.32 on my computer and noticed that paths to templates in Setup-Options-Templates are empty (see attached picture). Due to this fact also templates for graphical output are missing (see another picture). This issue has been recorded after installation of Scia Egnineer 2013 as well. Why does this happen? Remedy is quite easy - click on the button with three dots next to the path setting in Setup-Options, but because many users doesn't know I'm afraid there will be many support call again.

RMA implemented solution with missing paths to pictures and drawings templates, no problem in 15.1.56 (version of approval)

JPOL-9S9HLF "Check value" in value combo box under command "crack check" in Concrete tree is not translated solution approved in SEn 15.0

Ticket number(s)


to CZ. I have noticed this many versions ago but always hoped it is a temporary missing translation. Now I decided to report this. Please see attached picture that proves it. Tested in 14.0.1043 and 14.1.85

JPOL-9UYCPF Extra question mark in a dialogue before CDD analysis is run. Please see attached picture and delete the end question mark which is not necessary, I guess. Tested in 15.0.60

Approved in version 15.1.56

JPOL-9UYDQ8 Wrong Czech translation of a profile shape in Profiled sheeting library. In my opinion, "otevřít skrz" is rather exact translation of "open through", but not comprehensive type of profile shape. See attached pictures. By the way - shouldn't also the English expression be in a form of "through" instead of "trough"? Tested in 15.0.60 and 14.1.85

on the contrary - it should be ""otevřený žlabA typical drawback of texts for translation without any context

JPOL-9VLDXR Why is the function "select all" not available in some situations? The error message as you can see on attached pictures appears on different computers with different projects. What is the cause of this? Under which circumastances is this command not available? Tested in 15.0.100

fixed in R15.1

JPOL-9VSAT9 Czech version of concrete design defaults for IBC code contains errors. Please see attached pictures. Tested in 15.0.100

Approved in 15.1.56

JPOL-9VSGK5 Typho in detailed steel code check Please see attached picture and correct the tiny typho "tuto metody" and the double "podle". Tested in 15.0.100

Approved in 15.0.1019

JPOL-9W2JQT Composite check does not give any output for combination containing climatic load case. In attached project there are a few load cases assigned to load group with specification "wind" or "snow". Although these load cases are empty and internal forces for combinations including these load cases are displayed correctly, composite beam check (both construction and final stage) are not displayed. The result is empty sheet of paper containing just the header. If I remove these load cases from combination and leave only the first three load cases, results are shown.

Fixed and tested with 13.010.267 & verified with 15.298.10.

Ticket number(s)


Tested in 15.0.115

JPOL-9WVBBD

Not translated (English only) messages at the end of linear analysis. Please translate them (onle completely, one only partly). Messages attached as screen-shots below. Tested in 15.0.1019

new texts added just before the Setup was made. Now already translated (to Czech). Will be available in the next Setup (build)

JBES-9UQCFH Issue installation 14.0.1058: Several clients from same company have problems described in attachment. The Scia Engineer 14 cab file is missing appears during websetup (and also during full setup!) - C:/Program Files (x86)/Scia is added to the exceptions of the anti-virus - the folder from where the setup is run, is also added to the exceptions of the anti-virus.

ZenSupp.dll is now signed (since 15.0.120), so it shouldn't be reported by antivirus now

NNLL-9R8DRS Issue: Scia Concrete Section with the Dutch annex NEN EN1992-1-1 Frequent load combinations should be used for cracking checks in NEN EN 1992-1-1 (2011) instead of quasi permanent load combinations (acc. old NEN EN 1992-1-1 2007). See table 7.1N in attachment.

DLO: Fixed in 15.1 (15.1.72)

NNLL-9VSJZ8 In the printscreen in attachment, you can see that ZenSupp.dll is being flagged as dangerous by the user's anti-virus. I'm reporting this as issue, since it's happening with a 4th different customer today. Can we make sure that ZenSupp.dll is no longer found as threat by protection software? (Removing ZenSupp.dll will make Scia Engineer 15 useless, the solution is to just place a new ZenSupp.dll file)

ZenSupp.dll is now signed (since 15.0.120), so it should not be reported by antivirus

JKÜZ-9VTAQY Attached as you want the mystic sentence below the Npl,Rd sentence. WARNING: NEd > 0.05 * Npl,Rd,Beam! @{SteelConnection.strIDS_WARNING_WEAK_NRD_NOTCALC}

english string available now in german language (15.111.43), translation is correct in 15.1.78.

RCCA-9VKK3Y Issue: wrong LTB length and no table for steel slenderness Question: The length of the LTB is going wrong to the calculation from SDF. Apparently, we have some problem with the integration. The steel slenderness table is not appearing.

14/04 PVT: Hi Rodrigo,@ 1-4: The DataCache only contains the buckling lengths, not the LTB parameters.As can be seen in the CLS file (see screenshot), the LTB length is currently taken as the weak axis system length.In the ongoing Open

Ticket number(s)


1 - the following simple structure was modeled in Scia Engineer (picture 1) 2 - With no changes in LTB length, we have a unity check of 1,36 for LTB (picture 2) 3 - Changing the buckling data (picture 3), we have the same Lb and the same result for LTB (picture 4), that is not OK. 4 - Deleting the buckling data and changing the buckling and relative lengths (picture 5), we have again the same Lb and the same result for LTB (picture 6), that is not OK. 5 - Asking the steel slenderness (picture 7), we can see the value of 0,5 m for l LTB and when the preview is clicked, we have no table. The model and the pictures are in attachment and the version 15.0.100 of Scia Engineer was used.

Check development, the full buckling data, including the LTB length will be added to the DataCache.@ 5: Fixed in DEVE 11 build 15.111.45 and verified in R15.1.47: The Steel slenderness table is now visible and can be inserted into the Engineering Report.

NNLL-9UPFF3 CSS & AutoDesign: Empty buckling curves when using 'Change' 19/03 PVT: Solved in DEVE 11 build 15.111.07 and verified in P build 15.198.12. When using the 'Change' button the buckling curve is no longer set to manual by default.

Documents

SCIA Engineer Downloads - Data stored in this version can ...€¦ · The partially exported IFC file can be opened and imported again in Scia Engineer. There it will give a message: