16
School Questionnaire National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008

School Questionnaire

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

School Questionnaire. National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008. Content of the presentation. Field trial participation Field trial results Draft questionnaire for the MS. FT participation. Schools in survey 718 Schools with quest. data 682 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: School Questionnaire

School Questionnaire

National Research Coordinators Meeting Windsor, June 2008

Page 2: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Content of the presentation

• Field trial participation• Field trial results• Draft questionnaire for the MS

Page 3: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

FT participation

• Schools in survey 718

• Schools with quest. data 682

• NA 36

[DPC data]

Page 4: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

FT participation

• 26 countries > 85%

• 2 countries 85-80%

• 3 countries < 80%

[FT Analysis Report Part II, Table 25]

Page 5: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Principal characteristics

• Gender– Overall percentage: males 65%.– Gender distribution varies across

countries (male principals from 25% to 100%)

[T 29]

• Age– Two first categories collapsed

[T 28]

Page 6: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Scale reliability

• Pooled sample

• School autonomy (Q4)– Two dimensions confirmed (EFA)– SCAUTMAN1 α .81 – SCAUTEDU α .79– Increased reliability: item a dropped – Item j to be reworded

Page 7: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Scale reliability

• Participation in school governance (Q5)

– Only one dimension (EFA)

– SCTPART α .85

– Increased reliability: item e dropped

Page 8: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Scale reliability

• Student opportunity for participation in community STOPACT (Q6) α .82– To report single items for descriptive

purposes

• Parents participation - (Q8) α .73 – To report selected single items

instead of scale scores

Page 9: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Scale reliability

• Importance given to student opinion CSTUDIMP (Q10)

α .82 – To be deleted: not appropriate to

target grade students (also in TcQ)

• Student respect for school’s rules CSTURULE (Q11)

α .86– Minor changes in wording

Page 10: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Scale reliability

• Sense of belonging to the school (Q12)– Three-dimensional structure confirmed

(EFA)– TCBELONG α .85 – STBELONG α .84 – NTBELONG α .88

Page 11: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Scale reliability

• Issues of social tension – local area COMSOCT (Q14)

α .89

- changes in wording

- two items added (from Q15)

• Issues of social tension – inside the school SCHPROB (Q15)

α .81

[to be added to the TcQ]

Page 12: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Other questions

• Students’ participation in school elections (Q 7)– High percentages of missing answers– However important – keep in– Minor changes in wording

• Resources available in the local area (Q13)– Items to be reported as single items– Minor changes in wording

Page 13: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

• Implementation of CCE at school (Q16) [T 30]– Overlapping between answers– Consistency with NCS

• Aims of CCE (Q17) [T 31]– Different patterns across countries– Proposal: same as in TcQ (ex Q23-24)

• Responsibility for CCE (Q18) [T 32]– Differences across and within

countries

Page 14: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Proposed ScQ for the MS

• Same sections

• Same number of questions (22 instead of 23)

• Minor changes based on FT results

• Changes in wording according to NRCs comments (NAFs)

• Additional explanatory notes included

Page 15: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Proposed ScQ for the MS

• Some additional changes– Q5 and Q6 (MS draft): order of the

categories to be reversed

Page 16: School Questionnaire

NRCMeetingWindsor

June 2008

Questions or comments?