SCHOOL OF AYURVED - D. Y. Patil University · 2019. 6. 10. · dr. d. y. patil university school of ayurved nerul, navi-mumbai. feedback results 2013-18

Dr. D. Y. PATIL UNIVERSITY

SCHOOL OF AYURVEDNERUL, NAVI-MUMBAI.

FEEDBACK RESULTS

2013-18

There is an increasing trend in the overall feedback on the institute from 2014-2018that indicates progress in overall performance of the institute.

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

OVERALL FEDBACK ON INSTITUTE PERCENTAGE

OVERALL FEDBACK ON INSTITUTEPERCENTAGE

Note : * Others include (Patients, Parents, Visitors and Peers)**Employees include (Teaching and Non-Teaching Faculty)

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Other's view

Emplyee's view

Student's view

From the graph it is clear that there is a continuous progress in all the above attributes of teachers

SR. NO.

ATTRIBUTES FOR EVALUATION

1 KNOWLEDGE BASE

2 COMMUNICATION SKILLS

3 SINCERITY

4 INTEREST GENERATED IN SUBJECT

5ADVICING ABILITY FOR FUTURE

PROGRESS

6ABILITY TO INTEGRATE CONTENT WITH

ALLIED COURSES

7 ACCESSIBILITY OF TEACHER

8 ABILITY TO EVALUATE STUDENTS

9 PROVISION OF TIME FOR FEEDBACK

10 COMPLETION OF SYLLABUS

11 PRACTICAL APPROACH

12 SIMPLIFICATION OF CONCEPTS

13 ENCOURAGEMENT TO STUDENTS

82.5

83

83.5

84

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Students feedback on teachers

students feedback onteachers PERCENTAGE

It is clear that the institute is making constant efforts for the betterment of student’s welfare.

SR. NO.

ATTRIBUTES FOR EVALUATION

1 APPROACH TOWARDS COURSE

2 HELP BY CLERICAL STAFF

3 HELPFULNESS OF TEACHERS

4 TEACHER PARENT RELATIONSHIP

5 CALENDAR OF EVENTS PREPARATION

6 GUIDANCE FROM TEACHERS

7SATISFACTION WITH TEACHING

METHODS

8 OVERALL REPORTING OF STUDENTS

9 USEFULNESS OF COURSE TAUGHT

10 POSITIVE CHANGES TOWARDS GOALS

82.5

83

83.5

84

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

87

87.5

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

STUDENT'S ALUMINI PERCENTAGE

STUDENT'S ALUMINIPERCENTAGE

SR. NO. ATTRIBUTES FOR EVALUATION

1 ACADEMIC CONTENT

2 INTERACTION WITH FACULTY

3 INTERACTION WITH ADMINISTRATION

4 LIBRARY FACILITIES

5 PROVISION OF TEACHING AID

6 INTERNET FACILITIES

7 HELPFUL FEEDBACK

8 ENCOURAGEMENT FOR RESEARCH

9 PROVISION FOR SEMINARS, CME ETC

10 PROVISION FOR IMPROVEMENT

11 PROVISION FOR TOURS/CAMPS/VISITS

12 RESPONSE TO SUGGESTIONS

13 FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS

14 INTEREST GENERATION BY MGMT.

15 APPRECIATION OF GOOD WORK

Teacher’s feedback are taken into serious considerations forthe improvement of the institute as they play an important roleas a mediator between institute and students as well ascommunity. Above graph shows overall progress in teacher’sfeedback on institute.

83.5

84

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

87

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

TEACHING EMPLOYEE'S FEEDBACK ON INSTITUTE

TEACHING EMPLOYEE'SOVERALL FEEDBACK ONINSTITUTE PERCENTAGE

SR. NO.ATTRIBUTES FOR

EVALUATION

1 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES

2 EQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF WORK

3 JOB SATISFACTION

4 ACCESSIBILITY WITH MGMT.

5 RESPONSE TO YOUR SUGGESTIONS

6 INVOLVEMENT IN COLLEGE EVENTS

7 HYGIENIC FACILITIES

8 CO-OPERATION BY OTHER STAFF


10 FACILITY OF TRAINING PROGRAMS

There is an overall improvement in the facilities provided to the non teaching employees by the institute

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

NON TEACHING FEEDBACK PERCENTAGE

NON TEACHING FEEDBACKPERCENTAGE


EVALUATION

1 APPROACH TOWARDS COURSE

2 HELP BY CLERICAL STAFF

3 HELPFULNESS OF TEACHERS

4 TEACHER PARENT RELATIONSHIP

5CALENDAR OF EVENTS

PREPARATION


7 SATISFACTION WITH METHODS

8 OVERALL REPORTING OF STUDENTS

9 USEFULNESS OF COURSE TAUGHT

10 POSITIVE CHANGES IN WARD

There is a continuous growth in the level of satisfaction of parents on institute.

81.5

82

82.5

83

83.5

84

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

PARENTS FEEDBACK ON INSTITUTE

PARENTS FEEDBACK ONINSTITUTE PERCENTAGE


EVALUATION

1 HOSPITAL FACILITIES

2 HOSPITAL SERVICES


4 TEACHING AIDS PROVIDED

5 OVERALL ADMINISTRATION

6 BENEFITS FROM CAMPS

7 BEHAVIOUR OF CLERICAL STAFF

8 BEHAVIOUR OF HELPING STAFF

9 SATISFACTION

10 ABILITY TO CLARIFY DOUBTS BY STAFF

11 AVAILABILITY OF INTERNET


13 OVERALL ACADEMIC GRADATION

14 PROVISION OF RESEARCH

Above graph shows gradual improvement in the facilities provided by the hospital to the community.

77

77.5

78

78.5

79

79.5

80

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

VISITOR'S FEEDBACK ON HOSPITAL

VISITOR'S FEEDBACK ONHOSPITAL PERCENTAGE


EVALUATION

1 AVAILABILITY OF SPACE

2 OVERALL ADMINISTRATION

3 SATISFACTION



6 ABILITY TO CLARIFY DOUBTS BY STAFF

7 CLEANLINESS OF CAMPUS

Above graph shows gradual improvement in the facilities provided by the institute

79

79.5

80

80.5

81

81.5

82

82.5

83

83.5

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

VISITORS FEEDBACK ON COLLEGE

VISITORS FEEDBACK ONCOLLEGE PERCENTAGE


EVALUATION

1 HOSPITAL FACILITIES

2 DOCTOR PATIENT RELATIONSHIP

3 PROMPTNESS OF NURSING STAFF

4 HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION

5 SANITATION/HYGENIC PROVISIONS

6 PRIOR INFORMATION ON DISEASE



Above graph shows gradual improvement in the facilities provided by the hospital to the community.

82.5

83

83.5

84

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

PATIENTS FEEDBACK ON HOSPITAL

PATIENTS FEEDBCAK ONHOSPITAL PERCENTAGE


1 BASIC UNDERSTANDING OF SUBJECT

2EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING METHODS

3 SINCERITY

4 INTEREST GENERATED

5 ADVICING ABILITY

6 ABILITY TO INTEGRATE

7 ABILITY TO EVALUATE STUDENTS

8 PROVISION OF FEEDBACK

9 PRACTICAL APPROACH

10 SIMPLIFICATION OF CONCEPTS

11 ENCOURAGEMENT TO STUDENTS

There is a continuous growth in the level of satisfaction of academic peers on teachers.

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

87

87.5

88

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

ACADEMIC PEER'S FEEBACK ON TEACHERS

ACADEMIC PEER'S FEEBACKON TEACHERS PERCENTAGE


EVALUATION 1 ACADEMIC CONTENT

2 INTERACTION WITH FACULTY

3 INTERACTION WITH ADMINISTRATION


5 PROVISION OF TEACHING AID

6 INTERNET FACILITIES

7 HELPFUL FEEDBACK

8 ENCOURAGEMENT FOR RESEARCH

9 PROVISION FOR SEMINARS, CME ETC

10 PROVISION FOR IMPROVEMENT

11 PROVISION FOR TOURS/CAMPS/VISITS

12 RESPONSE TO SUGGESTIONS

13 FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS

14 INTEREST GENERATION BY MGMT.


There is a continuous growth in the level of satisfaction of academic peers on institute.13

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

ACADEMIC PEER'S FEEDBACK ON INSTITUTE

ACADEMIC PEER'S FEEDBACKON INSTITUTE PERCENTAGE

82.5

83

83.5

84

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

Student's Feedback about Syllabus & Curriculum

PERCENTAGE


1Learning value in terms of skill/concepts/

knowledge of current syllabus

2 Syllabus & curricular activities

3 Applicability to real life situations

4

Emphasis of fundamentals in curricular

content

5 Extent of coverage of syllabus for an year

6 Coverage of Modern / Advanced Topics

7 Relevance/learning value of

Projects/Journals/field visit/assignment etc.

8 Overall Ratings

9 Infrastructure facilities

The study shows that students are satisfied about syllabus and curriculum.

83.5

84

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

87

Teacher's Feedback About Syllabus & Curriculum

PERCENTAGE






4


content




Projects/Journals/field visit/assignment

etc.

8 Overall Ratings


Teachers are satisfied with syllabus contained and curriculum of the institute.

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

Employer's Feedback About Syllabus & Curriculum

PERCENTAGE






4


content





8 Overall Ratings


The study shows that employers are satisfied about syllabus and curriculum.

82.5

83

83.5

84

84.5

85

85.5

86

86.5

87

87.5

Feedback of Alumni About Syllabus & Curriculum

PERCENTAGE






4


content





8 Overall Ratings


The study shows that alumni are satisfied about syllabus and curriculum.

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

Feedback of Professionals About Syllabus & Curriculum

PERCENTAGE






4


content





8 Overall Ratings


The study shows that professionals are satisfied about syllabus and curriculum.

The overall feedback result

The overall feedback is very important to provide necessary improvement in all

the given attributes of institute

Student feedback results are shown to all the teachers so that they could understand their

weak points and take efforts to make betterment in their teaching methods.

• Various academic peers review on institute and facilities was good, the community who are getting benefits from the hospital are satisfied but still lacuna in some facilities which is inform to the head of the institution ,& advised fruitful solutions for the problems.

• The students alumni feedback is also important ,to give inspiration to the students ,who were newly registered for the course.

Documents

SCHOOL OF AYURVED - D. Y. Patil University · 2019. 6. 10. · dr. d. y. patil university school of ayurved nerul, navi-mumbai. feedback results 2013-18