Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
H O U S T O N I N D E P E N D E N T S C H O O L D I S T R I C T
S C H O O L I M P R O V E M E N T P L A N 2 0 1 7 - 2 0 1 8
Campus Name: Sam Houston Math, Science and Technology Center
Campus Number: 310
Principal Name: Alan Summers
School Support Officer Name: Stephen Linkous
Chief School Officer Name: Julia Dimmitt
Area School Office: North
2 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
MISSION STATEMENT
Houston Math, Science, and Technology Center is committed to maintaining a data-informed, student-driven culture by focusing on academic and social excellence.
SCHOOL PROFILE
SIP Part 1: Background, Data Analysis and Needs Assessment Sam Houston Math, Science and Technology Center (SHMSTC) is a comprehensive high school with a rich history. The school has been known by several names since 1878:
1878 to 1881 - Houston Academy
1881 to 1886 - Clopper Institute
1886 to 1895 - Houston Normal School
1895 to 1926 - Houston High School
1926 to 1955 - Central High School
1955 to 2008 - Sam Houston High School
2008 to present - Sam Houston Math, Science, and Technology Center Formerly located at Austin, Capitol, Caroline, and Rusk in Downtown Houston, the school known as Sam Houston High moved to its current location in 1955 on the north side of Houston within twenty minutes of the central business district and the Houston medical Center to serve the following neighborhoods: Melrose Park, Hardy Acres, Hardy Heights, Assumption Heights, Roos Acres, Virginia Acres, Sunnyland Farms, Oakwood, and Northline Terrace. Sam Houston MSTC currently serves over 2,700 students in grades nine through twelve. The student body is diverse and includes: Hispanic 90.5%, African American 7.5%, White 1.5% and Asian at 0.2%. Key student groups include 12% special education; 8% gifted and talented; 22% limited English proficient; 90.2% economically disadvantaged; and 84.6% at‐risk. The student mobility rate is 24.6% and the average daily attendance was 93.45% for the 2016‐2017 school year, up .16% from 2015-16. The school is committed to doing whatever it takes to create a safe and nurturing learning environment that promotes academic and social excellence for all students. Students will excel in a supportive and data-driven culture and acquire the college and career readiness skills necessary to be successful post-graduation. Sam Houston MSTC has several strong partnerships that foster a college bound culture and student commitment for success. Houston Community College has committed to service our students through their Dual Credit program. This program allows our students to receive college credit for courses that correlate with the Houston Independent School District’s high school courses. Sam Houston offers: English, US History, Economics, Business Information Management, and Cosmetology. Sam Houston MSTC continues to develop its Advanced Placement course offerings with eighteen courses offered for the 2017-2018 school year. The school partners with UT Outreach and Advise Texas as they
SIP Part 1: Background, Data Analysis and Needs Assessment
3 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
provide student tutors, computer maintenance assistance, scholarships for Sam Houston seniors, and a variety of other means of support.
The Go Center is a resource center to guide students through the post ‐secondary education process, including college scholarship, FAFSA application, and college entrance applications. In addition, Sam Houston MSTC offers six career and technical pathways: Architecture and Construction, Business Management and Administration, Cosmetology, Information Technology, and Transportation, Distribution, and Logistics, and Machining. Through these programs, students earn certifications and/or licenses preparing them for work in these fields. Distinguished Alumni of Sam Houston include:
Melvin Baker: NFL Player
Jeff Hunt: Chief Executive Officer of GCI Group
Olga Gallegos: former Houston ISD Board Member
Jack Valenti: former President of the Motion Picture Association of America
Marcus A. Peña: Tax Assessor-Collector of Austin County
Lyndon B. Johnson: 36th president of the United States taught public speaking in 1930
SHARED DECISION MAKING Organizational Structure
The Campus Intervention Team (CIT) is based on the Shared Decision-Making model (SDM) designed to establish, monitor, and evaluate goals for budgeting, staffing, curriculum, planning, school organization, staffing patterns, and staff development. This model is aligned to state legislation and HISD board policy. A Professional Service Provider (PSP), and a School Support Officer or Lead Principal is a member of the Campus Intervention Team for schools under state Improvement Required sanctions or federal sanctions as a Focus or Priority campus. Teacher Development Specialists and other district level personnel can serve as members of the CIT according to the campus needs. The intention of the SDMC is to pull together our community in a constructive, organized, and unified body to enhance the education of all students. The CIT is responsible for development, implementation, and monitoring of the School Improvement Plan, monitoring of student performance, and determination of student interventions and support service.
The SDMC component of the CIT is the shared decision-making body. Professional staff representatives are elected by the faculty. Principal determines number of classroom teachers; then, assigns half that number to school-based staff. This complies with 2/3 - 1/3 rule for professional staff. In addition, the committee must have one non-instructional staff, one business member, at least two parents and at least two community members. Parents are elected by the PTO, PTA or PACS membership.
The Council meets monthly and as needed to discuss issues brought forth by the administration, staff, parents, or community. It is supported by standing committees that address budgeting, staffing, curriculum, planning, school organization, staffing patterns, and staff development. Standing committees meet as needed. Parents are encouraged to serve on standing committees.
The SDMC functions under the direction of the Principal. Members of the SDMC attend SDMC meetings for the term of his/her office, monitor the implementation of the School Improvement Plan, address issues presented by the principal, present issues for discussion and recommend resolutions to the SDMC, create ad hoc committees by consensus of the SDMC, chair standing committees and ad hoc committees, submit minutes to the principal
4 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
for committee meetings, and report the recommendations to the SDMC. The SDMC is responsible for approving all professional development plans for the school.
The Principal coordinates the process of shared decision making, facilitates communication for all stakeholders, considers issues and recommendations from the community, SDMC, and standing committees, and makes decisions based on those recommendations.
Shared Decision Making Process
Consensus is the ultimate goal of the SDMC. Agreement by all participants is not always possible or necessary for consensus. Consensus is a collective process that provides a forum for full dialogue on appropriate/applicable responses to issues.
Members of the committees discuss and make recommendations to the SDMC. The SDMC reviews recommendations and reaches consensus. Sufficient consensus is defined as a willingness to settle an issue in favor of the majority. All points of view will be considered and general agreement must be reached before decisions will be implemented. If general agreement is not reached, further study of the issue will occur and alternatives will be presented until agreement is reached. After all alternatives have been explored, a deadlock can be broken by a majority vote. As issues come up for discussion, the chairperson is responsible for ensuring that all present have a legitimate opportunity to state their case. The principal retains the authority to exercise a veto over decisions made by the SDMC.
Method of Communications
Members of the school community may submit non-personnel issues for consideration through the shared decision-making process. Written issues or concerns are submitted to any SDMC member or placed in the SDMC box located in the main office. A school community member may attend a meeting of any committee to discuss or present an issue. All meetings are on the monthly calendar. The SDMC delivers issues to appropriate standing committees for action. Communications from all committees is transmitted to faculty, staff, and parents.
All SDMC information must be included on the campus website. A list of meeting dates, committee members, agendas and minutes for each meeting must be able to be accessed. The home page of each campus website must include a link to the SDMC page for easy access.
Membership Composition of the SDMC
Number of Classroom Teachers 3 Number of Parents (at least 2) 2
Number of School-based Staff (Half the number of classroom teachers)
1 Number of Community Members (at least 2)
2
Number of Non-Instructional Staff 2 Number of Business Members 1
(Modify or insert additional lines as needed)
Name of SDMC Member Position (Add Date Term expires)
Nicholas Bell Classroom Teacher
Kevin Black Classroom Teacher
Akiesha White Classroom Teacher
Nicole Harris Classroom Teacher
Crystal Curry Classroom Teacher
Jesse Washington Classroom Teacher
Rachel Rawlings Classroom Teacher
Kayley Green Classroom Teacher
5 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Hugo Monjica Business Member
Jesus Solis School-Based Staff
Michael Hines School-Based Staff
Jaime Moretti School-Based Staff
Yesenia Bonilla Non-Instructional Staff
Irene Rivera Community Member
Jackie Bastard Community Member
Maria Hernandez Parent
Maribel Alvarez Parent
Alan Summers Principal – School Based Staff
Olga Menchaca Non-Instructional Staff
Christina Pieknik School-based Staff
Other Campus Intervention Team members (non-SDMC):
For campuses designated for Improvement Required, Focus or Priority for 2017-2018:
Name Position
Stephen Linkous School Support Officer (SSO)
Click here to enter text. Professional Service Provider (PSP)
Jessica Chevalier Teacher Development Specialist (TDS)
Click here to enter text. Other district personnel – position: Click here to
enter text. Click here to enter text. Other district personnel – position: Click here to
enter text. Click here to enter text. Other: Click here to enter text.
6 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Narrative of Data Analysis and Root Causes (causal factors – include % of economically disadvantaged data)
An analysis of SHMSTC’s data from the 2016-2017 school year shows that many of our students require remediation in the core content areas. Our STAAR passing rates for the 2016-2017 school year are as follows: Reading – 39%, Math – 63%, Science – 66% and Social Studies – 89%. The following subgroups performed below the 60% threshold: African American – 43% passing, Hispanic – 56.2% passing, Special Education – 27% passing, ELL – 41% passing, and Economically Disadvantaged – 55.3% passing. We have identified the root cause of low passing rates to be literacy. In the 2016-2017 school year, over 50% of students entering the 9th grade were 2 or more grade levels behind in reading. When analyzing the data, we found a direct correlation between students’ Lexile levels (as evaluated on the SRI) and their STAAR performance. Over 80% of our 9th grade students are reading at a basic, or below basic level. Our students reading at “below basic”, and many of our students reading at the “basic” level were not successful on their English I and II STAAR tests. Additionally, we found a correlation with regards to success on the English STAAR tests and the other STAAR tests. A further correlation was found between reading level and success on STAAR tests because students who were not successful on ELA were more likely to have not passed the other STAAR tests. In sum, in addition to building upon the structures that we have put in place as a campus, we plan to focus on building literacy in all students through implementation of the best practices included in Literacy Empowered.
Narrative of Identified Needs – Include Special Education Needs
As noted above, literacy is the most pressing issue for our campus at this time. However, when looking into specific student groups, additional needs are evident. ELL (up 4%) and Special Education (down 5%) were our two lowest performing subgroups when looking at overall student achievement. We know that many of these students have lower reading levels due to learning disabilities or language acquisition. Being cognizant of this, additional support needs to be put in place for these students. Such supports are outlined in their respective Goal Areas. Following the in-depth data analysis, needs assessment and development of the campus SIP, the campus must indicate on this table that any unmet or barely met accountability standards have been addressed:
Performance Index
Met? Y/N
Unmet or barely met Subject(s) / Measure(s)?
Student Group(s) Below Standard?
Needs addressed in the following SIP Goal(s):
Texas Accountability System
I. Student Achievement
No Reading = 39% Math = 63% Science = 66% Social Studies = 89%
The following subgroups performed below the Target of 60% overall passing. The passing % for these subgroups (by content) are listed below: African American – 29% (R), 51% (M), 58% (Sc) Hispanic – 40% (R) Special Ed. – 16% (R), 30% (M), 34% (Sc), 57% (SS) Econ. Dis. – 39% (R), ELL – 23% (R), 58% (M), 57% (Sc)
Specific goals have been developed for literacy development, Special Education and ELL students which will increase rigor and cultivate an academic culture focused on reading, writing, and discourse.
II. Student Progress
Yes Met Sped and ELL improved from 36% and 34% met
Continued specific goals for these student groups.
7 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Performance Index
Met? Y/N
Unmet or barely met Subject(s) / Measure(s)?
Student Group(s) Below Standard?
Needs addressed in the following SIP Goal(s):
or exceeded progress in 2016, respectively, to 42% and 42% in 2017.
III. Closing Gaps Yes Met Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.
IV. Postsecondary Readiness
Yes Met Click here to enter text. Increase numbers of students enrolled in dual credit programs by 100%.
Federal System Safeguards
Reading Performance
No Overall 39% We did not meet the target of 60% overall students, nor did we meet the target for any subgroup.
Goals to increase rigor and data driven instruction in all classes will positively impact all student groups; Use of district reading screener BOY, MOY, and EOY data to use Lexiles campus-wide to improve reading levels; implementation of Literacy Empowered Strategies for reading, writing, and discourse.
Reading Participation
Yes Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.
Reading Alt #2 n/a Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.
Math Performance
Yes Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.
Math Participation
Yes Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.
Math Alt #2 n/a Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text.
4 Year Graduation
No We did not meet this
target. For the class of
2016 we were at 85%.
This is an improvement
from 80% in 2015.
All subgroups were
below the Texas
standard of 89%
(except Asian and
American Indian
in the class of 2015
which only had 3
students.
Monitoring student progress by credit checks by grade level assistant principals and registrar;
attendance monitoring by dropout
prevention specialists; utilizing
counselors to provide students who are
at-risk of dropping out with resources to
assist them.
5 Year Graduation
No We did not meet this target. We were at 87.7% for the 5-year extended graduation rate for the class of 2016. This is an improvement form 83% in 2014.
All students groups were below the Texas standard of 90% except American Indian and Asian which only had 3 students.
Use of Grad Lab Courses; use of a dedicated graduation counselor; use of tutorials for students who have not met the STAAR standard; trailer courses for seniors.
STAFF DEVELOPMENT PLANS – INCLUDE BELOW
8 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Restorative Justice Leadership is receiving training on best restorative justice practices and a professional development plan will be implemented throughout the year that introduces teachers to these practices and revisits them throughout the year. Staff development in restorative justice is intended to help teachers and staff create a constructive learning environment in which students’ incidents of misconduct are reduced and positive relationships are created. Trainings will be based on information gathered from several sources, including the Center for Safe and Secure Schools and The Center for Justice and Reconciliation. Targeted strategies such as Community Building Circle will foster belonging over exclusion and meaningful accountability over punishment. New Teachers In addition to the District’s New Teacher Orientation, teachers new to SHMSTC will receive on-going support throughout the school year. There will be monthly “New Teacher Academy” meetings for all teachers new to Sam Houston MSTC, led by our Campus Induction Coach and the district’s Literacy Empowered team. During these meetings, teachers will have the opportunity to discuss any school systems/procedures that they may have questions about, while receiving training on high-impact instructional strategies. In addition to these monthly meetings, all beginning teachers will be assigned a campus mentor. Campus mentors will be required to meet with their mentee(s) a certain number of hours per month.
Professional Learning Communities Teachers will meet weekly with their Professional Learning Community (PLC) to plan, disaggregate data, share best practices and engage in ATLAS protocols. PLC’s will ultimately seek to develop student learning activities that are personally meaningful to students, that develop a sufficiently high interest level such that students persist in the face of difficulty, and that students will find to be something of worth through the accomplishment of the task. The PLCs will be led by an instructional specialist, teacher leaders, and/or an administrator with background in the given content area. As PLC’s develop throughout the year, team leads and department chairs will have the ability to facilitate the PLCs, thus increasing the impact of teacher leaders on our campus. Depending on the purpose of the PLC, outputs of PLC’s may also include but not be limited to rigorous, aligned lessons; content-specific strategies that teachers can immediately implement; and individualized student intervention plans. CHAMPS Training Implementation of CHAMPS program through pre-service training and ongoing professional development that will develop an instructional structure that fosters student motivation and responsibility while informing teachers of how to give students strategies that will directly impact their success in the classroom.
SCHOOL WAIVERS FROM BOARD POLICY/GUIDELINES
9 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Our campus has approved waivers from HISD Board Policy and/or Guidelines, as outlined below, for the 2017-2018 school year.
Yes ☒ No ☐
#1-High Schools – Credits and Curriculum Waiver of Local Board Policy EIA (LOCAL) and EIC (LOCAL) The purpose of this waiver is to offer a pass/fail grade option to high achieving junior and senior AP/Dual Credit/Dual Enrollment/Honors students to encourage them to pursue their interests in extracurricular or multiyear programs, including their interests in physical fitness, sports, and Physical Education (PE) related courses, without having their GPA negatively affected. It is recommended by the HISD Curriculum Department that this waiver be approved, contingent upon a numerical grade being assigned to a student's first PE course: any additional PE courses can be offered with a pass/fail grading option. The support for the calculation of GPA will not be available from the District. Students must carry a full load of AP coursework. All other eligibility requirements will be determined by the school. The specific objective is to increase the number of students taking Advanced Placement/Dual Credit/Dual Enrollment/Honors courses and is identified in the school’s SIP. The success of this waiver will be determined by the number of students that request the pass/fail option and participate in extracurricular activities as compared to the year before.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Rationale for Waiver
Metrics of Success
#2-All Schools - HISD Early Dismissal Days Waiver of Local Board Policy EB(LOCAL) and Board Approved 2017-2018 Academic Calendar This waiver allows a school to be exempt from the district early dismissal calendar days of September 21st, October 20th, November 10th, January 26th and February 23rd of the 2017-2018 school year. Students can attend school for a full-day instead of releasing early those days. Schools will be responsible for the additional cost of transportation that is incurred by this waiver as well as the responsibility of notifications to parents of the altered schedule change that is brought about by this waiver.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Rationale for Waiver
Metrics of Success
10 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
#3-Alternative Schools - PTA/PTO on Campuses with Specialty Instructional Settings Waiver of Local Board Policy GE (LOCAL) and GE1 (REGULATION) This is a request to waive the requirement for a PTA/PTO program at these unique, highly transitional alternative campuses in HISD. Students attending these campuses are assigned on an individual basis, and many times only assigned for a short duration. Since each child’s program is individualized and confidential, individual parent meetings are utilized to discuss student services that meet the needs of every single student. When possible, parents are required to participate in meetings and/or parent conferences to give consent to services rendered. Many times phone conferences are conducted in lieu of parent attendance to accommodate a particular student status. The impact of this waiver will be measured by the number of individual parent meetings held and its relation to individual student success with the ongoing and self-paced instructional services offered at the campus under the supervision of trained teacher/mentors.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Rationale for Waiver
Metrics of Success
#4-All Schools – Nine (9) Week Grading Cycle – Grading Cycle Waiver of Local board Policy EIA (LOCAL) The purpose of this waiver is to use a nine week grading cycle. This will provide teachers with additional instructional time with students before grading periods. Student achievement will be positively impacted by providing students more time to improve their grades following the distribution of progress reports. The nine week cycle will align and provide for consistent communication with parents. This does not waive required UIL three week progress reporting. With a 9 week grading cycle, students have extended time to progress and have a longer opportunity to develop and demonstrate mastery on TEKS.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Rationale for Waiver
Metrics of Success
#5-High Schools - Modified Schedule/State Assessment Days (State General Waiver) This Waiver allows the district or charter school to modify the schedule of classes for high school students
11 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
(Grades 9-12) only who are not being tested to report to and attend the school after the state assessment testing period has ended, therefore, reducing the interruptions during the testing period. Al students must be scheduled for at least 240 minutes of instruction. The time students test can be included as instructional time. If this is a renewal, a statement of compliance is required.
Yes ☒ No ☐
Rationale for Waiver
Metrics of Success
#6-High Schools - Foreign Exchange Student Waiver of TEC §25.001(E) The purpose of this waiver is to limit the number to 5 or more per high school must be submitted as a general waiver application. Districts and charter schools may request a waiver to limit the number of foreign exchange students admitted into the district under Texas Education Code §25.001(e). The approval of this waiver is not retroactive and takes effect on the date that the agency approves the application. The districts and charter schools are required to enroll foreign exchange student who arrive in the district or who have requested enrollment in the district prior to the waiver approval date.
Yes ☒ No ☒
Rationale for Waiver
Metrics of Success
#7-High Schools – Credits and Curriculum Waiver (School Guidelines, Section VIII)
12 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
The purpose of this waiver is to allow students to earn the one-half health credit through the designated disciplines of either physical education (PE) or Biology I by embedding health TEKS and aligning them with the designated discipline. The designated discipline teacher must be certified in Health. TEKS integration must be documented and the course syllabus must be submitted to and approved by Curriculum through the Student Health Advisory Committee (SHAC).
Yes ☐ No ☐
Rationale for Waiver
Metrics of Success
13 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
The SIP requires SMART Goals (which should include a summative evaluation, which outlines the factors used to measure the objective at year-end and to determine if it was attained) and measurable objectives based on the Needs Assessment. Campuses must address any unmet accountability index and any unmet System Safeguard. Based on the Data Analysis and Needs Assessment, the following Goals must be addressed. Faced with a priority need, the goal is the changed outcome the campus is planning to accomplish. All goal areas specific to your campus grade levels must be addressed. Goal Area I: Increase Student Achievement (HISD Goal 1)
1. Reading/Language Arts 2. Mathematics 3. Accountability and Federal System Safeguards 4. Index 4 Goals
a. Dropout Prevention / Graduation Rate Improvement (MS,HS) b. Ninth Grade Promotion (HS) c. Advanced Course / Dual Credit Enrollment (HS) d. AP/IB Exams Participation and Scores (HS) e. PSAT/SAT/ACT Participation and Scores (HS) f. College Readiness (ES,MS,HS)
5. Attendance
Goal Area II: Improve Safety, Public Support, and Confidence (HISD Goals 3, 5) a. Bullying Prevention b. Child Abuse & Sexual Abuse Prevention c. Coordinated Health Program (Elementary, Middle, and K-8 Campuses Required) d. Dating Violence Awareness e. Discipline Management – Safe Environments
a. DAEP Referrals b. Special Education In-school Suspension c. Special Education Out-of-School Suspension
f. Drug, Tobacco, Alcohol Prevention g. Suicide Prevention h. Parent and Community Involvement
Goal Area III: Special Population Goals & Strategies – include funding sources in the Resource Column for Special Populations
a. Gifted & Talented Program b. Special Education Program
a. STAAR/EOC Participation b. Representation
i. Overall ii. African-American
iii. Hispanic iv. ELL
c. Placement in Instructional Setting 40/41 c. Economically Disadvantaged
a. STAAR/EOC Participation d. English Language Learners
a. STAAR/EOC Participation b. TELPAS Reading and Composite Scores
e. Dyslexia Program
SIP Part 2: Goals & Objectives
14 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 1: Student Achievement: Reading/Language Arts
Priority Need: Improve STAAR English I & II Scores; Improve Students’ Lexiles
Critical Success Factor(s): 80% of students will meet Lexile Growth Scores, which will impact students’ achievement on the English STAAR tests
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
60% overall passing in English I; 65% overall passing in English II
Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
By the end of the 2017-18 academic year, students will have critically consumed a variety of texts as evidenced by multiple course notebook entries per week.
Team members will determine how students will critically consume high volumes of texts, inclusive of narrative material, images, graphs, and charts. Cognitive strategies will focus on teaching, modeling, supporting, and monitoring reading.
Department chairs, instructional specialists, content teachers; assistant principal(s) working with ELA department.
Literacy Empowered training; campus instructional specialist, district literacy specialist; SRW teacher; classroom libraries, Achieve 3000, Newsela; Houston Public Library digital access
Teachers will receive Literacy Empowered training by July 31, 2017. Ongoing literacy training opportunities and PLC meetings will focus on developing effective reading instruction. Monthly progress checks should show to what extent students are becoming proficient readers. A midyear checkpoint should show that every student is using a strategy that consistently aids reading comprehension.
After the first month (October 12th) and at the midyear checkpoint (December 12th) the department PLC will assess through On Track data reports and student reading logs whether they are meeting their goals. Teachers will bring evidence of the work and assistant principals & instructional specialists may share the successes they have observed. Adjustments may be made at these times to ensure success. Students will be assessed using the districtwide screener three times a year (BOY, MOY, and EOY).
15 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
By the end of the 2017-18 academic year, teachers will have impacted student writing proficiency by modeling effective writing for a variety of authentic purposes (formal writing, informal writing, revising) as measured by student writing content.
Department chairs and their teams establish what writing looks like in their content; teachers plan for modeling writing opportunities (teachers will model writing each class period as opposed to reusing the written model); modeled writing and modeled revision is performed in classrooms; student portfolios archive and exhibit work.
Department chairs, instructional specialists, content teachers; assistant principal(s) working with ELA department.
Writing to Learn Strategies; master course lesson; campus literary specialist; district ELA specialist
Teachers receive Writing to Learn Strategies as part of Literacy Empowered by July 31st, 2017. By October 4, 2017 department PLC’s will determine the level of student engagement in utilizing writing skills in order to support campus literacy. A midyear checkpoint should show every student has produced multiple exemplars of purposeful formal and informal writing samples.
After the first month (October 12th) and midyear checkpoint (December 12th) when data is collected and shared in PLC’s it will be obvious whether the campus is on track to meet to goal of teacher modeled writing with the result of effective student writing samples as the outcome. If there are indications that the campus is behind at these times, PLC teams and instructional leaders will discuss the barriers and make adjustments to ensure success.
Small Group Instruction will be implemented weekly in all ELA classes.
Students will be grouped based on their data so that teachers can implement a Station Rotation model in their classrooms
ELA & ESL Instructional Specialists; ELA teachers
Student data reports from On Track, Renaissance 360, and Achieve 3000; PD focus on planning for stations; campus Reading Lab; training from district personnel bi-monthly in the fall semester.
ELA teachers will be trained on stations during teacher in-service; by the end of September, ELA teachers will have current data on their students and will use this data to group students for stations; ELA teachers will have time during at least 1 PLC per month to plan for stations
Students who need
remediation on specific
objectives will receive
small group instruction
on these objectives
beginning October 9th
and on-going
throughout the school
year when the station
rotation model is
utilized; teachers will
disaggregate data after
each common
assessment to identify
students who need
remediation.
16 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Cultivate a school wide culture of dialogic classrooms vs. monologic classrooms by decreasing the amount of teacher talk to 20% of class time as evidenced by lesson plans, observations, student engagement, and content area data points.
Department chairs and content teams work to determine strategies and plan lessons that that allow for discourse opportunities in the classroom, including pre-written open-ended questions written into lesson plans.
Department chairs, instructional specialists, content teachers; assistant principal(s) working with content area teams.
Strategic Reading and Writing instructional block model; content from “Academic Conversations”, district ELA/Literacy TDS; Literacy Empowered training materials such as scaffolded conversational models and structured conversation strategies.
Teachers are trained in structured conversation strategies as part of Literacy Empowered by July 31st, 2017. The first two weeks of school teachers discuss, define, model, and establish foundations that allow their classes to have academic conversations all year. Ongoing PLC meetings will collaboratively work to incorporate more structured conversation opportunities and celebrate goal-meeting. First month and midyear date is collected to determine whether the campus is on track to meet its goal.
Meeting agendas, notes, walkthrough and observation documents, and student and teacher data will show teachers are facilitating conversations through open-ended questions and that show all students are participating in discourse by justifying their contributions with evidence and/or reasoning. Dialogic Classroom data to be reviewed by instructional specialists by December 6th and instructional modifications to be made based on this data.
17 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 1: Student Achievement: Math
18 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Measurable Objective
Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed.,
Bilingual/ESL, Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
Overall passing on Algebra STAAR will be at 60% or higher
Khan Academy (KA) will be implemented school wide with the math department. The data will be tracked and action plans for teachers and individual student intervention plans will be developed; KA will help differentiate instruction for all students
Math Instructional Specialist; Algebra 1 Team Lead
KA Training; Student computers to access the screener; Professional development and in class support from Deans and IS to help teacher implementation and to ensure fidelity
The screeners will be given at the beginning, middle, and end of year; Teachers will plan to integrate KA weekly and review data in PLCs to modify upcoming lessons
Provide professional development and in class support from Assistant Principals and IS team to help teacher implementation; Monthly data checks and conversations to emphasize the importance of dedicating portions of classroom time to KA and discussing how to use KA data to drive instruction.
Re-Tester passing will be at 40% or Higher
Create a universal monitoring system for Math retesters; Target retesters for Saturday tutorials
Math Instructional Specialist; Math teachers who are teaching retesters
Our Math Instructional specialist will create a universal monitoring system for retesters and teachers of retesters will be trained on this system; Assessments will be created for retesters to gather current data
Within the first 4 weeks of school, a monitoring system will be created and teachers will be introduced to this at the first department meeting; retester assessments will begin in September; Students will be invited to 12 Saturday tutorial sessions, based on their specific needs.
All students will be informed of their testing status and the tutorial dates by October 3rd, 75% of Math retesters will attend at least 6 sessions before the December retest; Math teachers will
19 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
on these students so teachers can intervene appropriately; Retesters will be invited to objective-driven tutorials based on their performance on retesters assessments
begin tracking progress of retesters after the first common assessment the week of October 9th.
Advanced performance will be at 35% or higher
Strategically schedule students with high 8th-grade math scores into PreAP classes; Provide professional development on rigor, differentiation, planning, etc. for GT students. In class support in PreAP courses; Attempt to set up collaboration with PreAP 8th grade teachers of feeder middle schools to establish vertical alignment; All classrooms will have extension/enrichment opportunities; Tutorial sessions will be offered for high-performing students
Math Instructional Specialist; Algebra 1 Team Lead; Math Department Chairs; Math Administrators.
The Math team will enlist the support of district personnel for additional PreAP resources.
Ensure students are scheduled appropriately by completing schedule audits by the end of the second week of school; Within the first 3 weeks of school, all teachers will have planned extension activities that are available to students; by the second district early release day, the Math Administrators will have contacted the feeder middle schools to establish a meeting time to discuss vertical alignment and plan vertically aligned strategies that are related rigor; On-going evaluation in PLCs of the rigor of lessons/activities/assessments.
Extension activities will be observed being used in classrooms for students who finish assigned work early; Math Department Chair will create a system to identify students who are within 5-7 students away from “advanced” performance on common assessments and Snapshots and develop a tutorial plan for these students beginning the second six weeks (October 9th); Teachers will engage in rigor protocols in PLCs to evaluate the rigor of their lesson activities; By the end of the spring semester, we will have collaborated with feeder middle schools at least two times to ensure
20 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
vertical alignment and rigor; Algebra 1 teachers will attend at least 6 hours of professional development related to rigor (including time spent in PLCs focused on rigor).
21 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 1: Student Achievement: Performance Index - Student Achievement /Student Progress/Closing Gaps/Postsecondary Readiness
(mandatory, if not met)
Priority Need: Increase Student Achievement
Critical Success Factor(s): PLCs and Tutorials will be objective and data driven; Differentiated instruction will address the needs of all students (which will be reflected in all indices)
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
Student Achievement for all subgroups will increase
Measureable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
PLC’s will be normed
across all content areas
and each PLC will have
a strategic schedule with
a mind on the student as
a whole (i.e., data
DDI/Student Work
review, Modeling Best
Practices; Lesson
Planning, Restorative
Justice)
Instructional Specialist
team will create PLC
agendas that are
responsive to campus
needs
Data PLCs will have an
output of a
reteach/intervention
plan. These PLCs will
also have a focus on
retester remediation.
Planning PLCs will
analyze upcoming
TEKS and backwards
plan instruction from the
upcoming assessments.
These PLCs will also
have a focus on retester
remediation.
Practice PLCs will have
teachers engage in
lesson tuning protocols
and receive feedback for
lesson revision from
their colleagues
Instructional Specialists;
Associate Principal
ATLAS protocols, PLC
Type/Output document,
released assessment
items, district planning
guides, restorative
justice materials, scope
and sequence for each
content area, blueprints
for district assessments
Weekly throughout the
2017-2018 school year
PLC evaluation rubric
will be used to ensure
the PLC outcomes are
directly linked to
student achievement;
Instructional Specialists
will meet weekly and
reflect upon the
outcomes of the prior
week’s PLCs and
revising upcoming
agendas accordingly
22 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Learning PLCs will focus on new strategies to implement and an output will be integrating the new learnings into upcoming lessons
80% of Retesting
students and 75% of
students not mastering
EOC objectives will
attend at least 4 tutorial
sessions
Students will receive
personalized invitations
to attend objective-
driven tutorials
Tutorial sessions will teach the objective in a new way and will be highly engaging and will end with an assessment of student mastery
Instructional Specialists,
Teachers, At-Risk
Program Managers,
Assistant Principals
Current student data
broken down by
objective; Tutorial
invitation template;
resources for teachers to
plan objective-driven
lessons (such as released
assessment items)
Saturday tutorials will
be held weekly
beginning 9/16/17.
Student tutorial
attendance will be
tracked starting October
4th, 2017; Student
performance data will
be correlated with
tutorial attendance at the
end of each 6 weeks.
Teachers will
differentiate instruction
based on student needs
Training will be
provided to all staff
members on
differentiation
techniques for special
education and ELL
students
Teachers will have opportunities in PLCs to discuss strategies and plan for differentiated instruction
Instructional Specialists,
Assistant Principals
over Special
Populations
Chancery and A4E,
ELL content strategies,
Examples of SPED
Modifications and
Accommodations, use
of computer-based
programs such as
Achieve 3000 and
NewsELA that
differentiate for student
need
Training will be
provided during teacher
in service and once
during the first 6 weeks;
PLCs will be on-going
throughout the school
year
Differentiated
instruction for groups of
students will be
reflected in weekly
lesson plans; PLC
minutes will reflect time
spent on discussing and
planning for strategies
related to differentiated
instruction
60% of students will
meet the STAAR post-
secondary readiness
standard
Training will be
provided on rigor, and
teachers will review the
rigor of their lessons
through tuning protocols
in PLCs.
Extension activities will be readily available in all classes to extend students’ thinking and
Instructional Specialists
Rigor Readiness
Protocol; Lesson Tuning
& other ATLAS
protocols; Webb’s DoK
Matrix; Bloom’s
Taxonomy;
Walkthrough form for I-
4; Resources for PLCs
to create extension
activities
Protocols that evaluate
the rigor and higher-
order thinking skills
embedded into lessons
will begin by the end of
the first 6 weeks; The
evaluation of lesson
rigor will be on-going;
Once per 6 weeks,
teachers will receive
PLC minutes will reflect
the use of the Rigor
Readiness protocol (or
other protocols that are
used to evaluate lesson
rigor); Appraisers will
complete I-4
walkthrough feedback
forms once per 6 weeks
23 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
allow them to use critical thinking skills as they engage in challenging activities as an extension of the curriculum.
feedback on I-4 (higher-
order thinking) as
related to the TADS
rubric.
24 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 1: Student Achievement: Federal System Safeguards – (mandatory, if not met)
Priority Need: Improve Reading and Math Performance (as outlined above under student achievement); Increase Graduation Rate
Critical Success Factor(s): Assistant Principals and academic counselors will track students’ credits and create academic plans for students who are off
cohort to graduate in order to get them back on track; Dropout prevention specialists and counseling department with work with
students who are at-risk of dropping out and provide them with resources to help them stay in school; tutorial sessions targeted at
students needing STAAR to graduate. Goal and Summative Evaluation:
90% graduation rate.
25 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
Individualized student
scheduling/academic
plan based on credits
needed for graduation.
Assistant Principals and
academic counselors
will utilize graduation
plan checklists in order
to identify credits
needed for graduation
and place students who
have failed required
courses in appropriate
credit recovery sections,
zero period, or grad lab
courses in order to
quickly regain credit.
Assistant principals and
academic counselors
will meet with students
who are at risk of not
being promoted to
ensure they are
scheduled appropriately
for the summer and
upcoming school year
One assistant principal
with the assistance of a
dedicated academic
graduation counselor
will oversee the students
Assistant Principals,
Academic Counselors,
Principal, Counselors,
Registrar
Degree Plans, Student
transcripts, student
schedules
Graduation
plans/schedule audits
will be completed by
September 14th, 2018
for the fall semester, by
January 16th for the
Spring semester, and by
May 28th for the end of
the school year audit
The number of students
off cohort will decrease
each semester; four-year
and five-year graduation
rate will increase.
Checks for cohort on-
track status take place
by October 19, January
9, and March 27.
26 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
for the graduating class
of 2018 who are off
cohort and are not
currently classified as
seniors.
Support for students at-
risk of dropping out
Dropout prevention
team will work with
students to monitor
attendance and conduct
home visits when
necessary.
Counseling team will oversee aligning resources to students needs and run counseling sessions for our students who would benefit from support in specific areas (such as groups for teen parents).
Counselors, Drop-out
prevention team
Attendance reports;
A4E data that lists risk
factors for our highly at-
risk students
Attendance will be
monitored continually –
after 3 absences and no
contact with the
student/family, a home
visit will be conducted.
Highly at-risk students will be placed in contact with counselors
Seniors’ absences will
be monitored, as there is
often a correlation
between their
attendance and their
grades; Overall, there
will be an increase in
Senior attendance from
2017’s 93.7% to 95% in
2018.
STAAR
Tutorials/Interventions
for Seniors
Seniors (and all
students) who need
STAAR to graduate will
be invited to Saturday
tutorials based on the
tests that they need to
pass.
If their schedule allows,
seniors will be
scheduled into a
STAAR review class.
Instructional specialists will conduct pull-outs with seniors who need
Associate Principal, 12th
Grade Assistant
Principals, Instructional
Specialists
STAAR Data (in order
to strategically invite
students to tutorials);
curriculum for Saturday
tutorials to ensure they
are objective-driven and
aligned to STAAR
Tutorials will begin
9/16/17 and all retesters
for all grade levels will
be invited as to
intervene early for those
students who need to
retest. Students will be
invited to weekly
STAAR tutorials.
Tutorial attendance will
increase weekly;
STAAR retesters
numbers will decrease
by over 50% by the end
of the school year; the
number of Senior
STAAR retesters will
decrease; the # of
seniors not graduating
because of STAAR will
decrease by at least 15
students; tracking of
students’ progress in
reading and math for
those students who
27 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
to pass STAAR in order
to graduate.
Tutorials, as they will be
open to all students, will
also impact meeting the
target of 60% in Math
and Reading.
attend tutorials to
evaluate the effectiveness of
tutorials.
28 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 1: Student Achievement: Attendance
Priority Need: Check Attendance Daily
Critical Success Factor(s): Daily Average attendance over 95% Goal and Summative Evaluation:
To have 95% attendance for the 2017-2018 school year
Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
Improve attendance monitoring.
Check GradeSpeed daily for student attendance; make daily phone calls to parents whose students are absent; complete home visits when students have chronic absences; mail out warning letter with copy of student
attendance.
At-Risk Program Managers; Grade Level Clerks, grade level Deans, counselors.
Utilizing the HISD truancy website to get letters and attendance contracts; Reports from GradeSpeed and Chancery.
On-Going
Comparison of attendance from the past school years; Checkpoints every 6 weeks to monitory YTD Attendance.
Identify and address students with 3 or more
consecutive absences.
Utilize attendance contracts with students who have excessive, absences; ensure teachers are trained on submitting attendance referrals, set up conferences with parents/guardians.
At-Risk Program Managers; Grade Level Clerks, grade level Deans, counselors.
Utilizing the HISD truancy website to get letters and attendance contracts; Reports from GradeSpeed and Chancery; Attendance referrals.
On-Going
Comparison of attendance from the past school years; Checkpoints every 6 weeks (end of each cycle) to monitory YTD Attendance.
29 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Goal Area 2: Improve Safety, Public Support, and Confidence:
Student Discipline: Reducing Disproportionality in Out of School Suspension as it relates to race or sex
Priority Need: Increase in-school consequences (as opposed to out of school consequences) to ensure that students have a higher percentage of
instructional time and continuity in the curriculum.
Critical Success Factor(s): The Sam Houston Alternative Center (SHAC) in-house disciplinary alternative education center; restorative justice practices;
PBIS implementation, school culture surveys.
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
Reduce out-of-school suspensions by 30%. Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member
Responsible Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
Off campus DAEP placement will be reduced by 20%
Effectively run an alternative disciplinary setting on campus that focuses on helping students maintain and/or improve academically and provides social skills training to improve self-esteem, communication and problem-solving skills in order to have a positive influence on behavior during their placement.
SHAC administrator and teachers; counseling team, assistant principals, instructional specialists.
Dedicated SHAC teacher; special education assistance team, peer tutors, digital tools
Open for class on August 28th, 2017 and operate throughout the school year. Students will receive 20-, 30-, 04 45 day placements depending on the nature of the behavior.
Successful entry, monitoring, and exiting of students in The SHAC. Improved academic performance based on grade reports and tests scores. Lessened discipline reports on these students after being exited from The SHAC.
Discipline referrals will decrease by 20%.
Implement restorative justice practices that move the focus of discipline from punishment to learning and from the individual to the community.
PBIS team; assistant principals
Restorative justice trainings; CHAMPS trainings, PBIS resources
On-going Implementation updates will be held during early release dates; student and staff culture survey at designated times throughout the school year;
30 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
ultimately, the implementation of PBIS will have a positive impact on student behavior and will reduce behavioral infractions, which will in turn result in less out of school suspensions. Surveys will be
conducted at the end
of each semester
(December 11 and
April 27).
31 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 2: Improve Safety, Public Support, and Confidence: Safety
Priority Need: Improve the feeling of safety throughout the common areas of the school.
Critical Success Factor(s): PBIS (Positive Behavior Intervention Systems) Data
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
Improve PBIS Data so that more than 70% of students feel safe in all areas of the building
Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
Common Areas and Passing Periods: 70% of students feel as though the common hallways are safe. Also, 80% of teachers are interacting positively with students while at their door.
PBIS Tardy Sweeps and Positive Interactions: Teachers, Administrative Assistants, and Administrators will receive training on how to implement positive ways to interact with students. Also, personnel will receive training on how to implement tardy sweeps to help clear out the hallway
Administrators PBIS Team Administrative Assistants Positive Sweep Team Classroom Teachers
PBIS Survey: Survey will used to acquire data on how students feel about the school PBIS Training Materials: Materials will be used to help train teachers. Student Resources: Learning materials and videos will be created to help model to students what the proper way to act in the hallway.
Training will be given in the beginning of the year. Feedback will be received during the course of the Fall Semester. This feedback will be used to finalize Hallway Policy sheet and Tardy Program in the Spring
Feedback will be received by the Administrators and Positive Sweep team on a monthly basis. In February and May we will receive survey data from the students and staff on the safety levels of different areas of the building.
Restrooms: 70% of students feel as though the restrooms are safe environments
After tardy sweeps staff will monitor bathrooms and make sure the facilities are using the facility properly. Also, when the duty teacher leaves they will check the restroom again
Administrators Duty Teachers Positive Sweep Team
Training Materials: When teacher training takes place to model what duty looks like, materials and training will also be provided to show what a bathroom sweep looks like and what to do
Training will be provided in the beginning of the school year to model what Teacher Duty looks. Administrator Audits of hotspots will take place will take place throughout the Fall and
Feedback will be received by the Administrators and Positive Sweep team on a monthly basis. In February and May we will receive survey data from the students and staff on the safety levels
32 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Student Resources: Learning materials and videos will be created to help model to students the proper way to act in the bathroom. A4E: Tracking of discipline and the locations of certain discipline hotspots is paramount in improving safety on campus
resources will be redirected to areas of high concern. In the Spring we will finalize our plan and obtain feedback on the system.
of different areas of the building.
Discipline Intervention: Top 3% of struggling students will receive further conversations and supports for behavior.
Based upon data that is received from tardy tracker and PEIMS (Constant Level 2 and 3) information off of A4E we will ascertain and start implementing behavior interventions to specific students
Administrators Attendance Office
Tardy Tracker and A4E Data: Data needs accumulated to ascertain what students need to be worked with Consequence / Support Ladder: Consequences and supports need to be normalized to keep support staff on the same page Positive Reinforcement Ladder: Students need to be reinforced with positivity. Creating rewards for improvement are imperative for student success.
In mid-September we will accruing data on high tardy offenders. Administrator conversations need to start to take place with these students. In early October we will compile information from A4E and relate that with the tardy data to ascertain which students we will focus on. Interventions will occur by support staff and in January we will reconvene on these students to see if improvement has occurred with these students.
Mid-September: Tardy conversations will occur with high offenders Early October: Tardy data and PEIMs data will be combined to ascertain student group to be worked with. Mid-January: Data will be accumulated for student discipline target group and we will celebrate success and improve upon areas of weakness.
33 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 2: Improve Safety, Public Support, and Confidence: Parent and Community Involvement
Priority Need: To have more support from businesses in the community.
Critical Success Factor(s): To rebuild community involvement with PTO, and community leaders.
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
To build a more expansive network with community resources/agencies.
Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
To increase
communication between
the school and the
community and build a
stronger relationship
between the school and
community
Utilize organizations to
provide services at Sam
Houston; continue
building a stronger PTO
at Sam Houston in order
to engage more parents
in school activities;
Utilize the constable to
be more accessible to
the community when
possible.
Host events with Harris
County Precinct 1.
Open the track and
fields so that they can be
used by families in the
community for health,
wellness and recreation.
Have student organizations engage in outreach with local
PTO; Counselors;
Parent Liaison; Deputy
Marenco; Campus
Administrators.
Parent Center; Vips;
campus calendar.
On-going throughout
the 2017-2018 School
year.
Middle of the year
checkpoint (December
4) with feeder pattern
schools to evaluate the
benefits of the programs
being implemented
within the community;
End of year survey as
well as qualitative
information from
parents and community
members related to the
impact that these
programs have had on
the community
throughout the school
year.
34 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
businesses in order provide them with information about campus events, activity calendars, and to extend
goodwill and encourage
involvement with the
campus.
Establish a tutoring/mentorship program with our senior students and feeder middle and elementary schools to help instill in our students the importance of giving back to the community
35 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 2: Improve Safety, Public Support, and Confidence: Coordinated Health Program (ES, MS and K-8 Campuses)
Priority Need: n/a
Critical Success Factor(s): n/a
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
n/a
Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
36 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 3: Special Populations: ELL
Priority Need: Improve both STAAR and TELPAS ELL student performance
Critical Success Factor(s): On-going Sheltered Instruction training campus-wide; PLCs and Professional Development that continually discuss ELL student needs, data, strategies, classroom rigor, and ELPS.
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
STAAR ELA I- 40%; STAAR ELA II- 35%; Algebra I- 40%; Biology- 55%; US History- 70%. TELPAS – 60% Increase One Level or meet Advanced High Composite
37 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Measurable Objective
Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed.,
Bilingual/ESL, Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
Increase ELL
Professional Development
attendance and ELL
strategy usage of
teachers in STAAR
related courses (ELA I,
ELA II, Algebra,
Biology, and US
History).
Sheltered Instruction
and ELL Strategies
Professional
Development (QTEL)
conducted in core
content PLCs, After-
Schools, and during
Early Release for ELA
I, ELA II, Algebra I,
Biology, and US
History teachers . In-
class support at a
minimum of once a
semester for STAAR
tested courses.
Core teachers will collaborate with ELL Instructional Specialists on how to successfully implement Sheltered Instruction strategies.
ELL Instructional Specialists (G. Gonzalez & J. Moretti) and ELL Assistant Principal (A. Torres)
Sheltered Instruction
HISD Professional
Development and
Professional
Development (QTEL)
created by and
delivered by SHMSTC
ELL Specialists and
Asst. Principal.
ELPS and ELL Strategy
training conducted
during in-service first
2 weeks for teachers;
1 PLC or 1 After
School Session offered
each month starting
in September and
ending in April
(excluding December)
for ELA I, ELA II,
Biology, Algebra, and
US History teachers.
Teachers will sign in
for training. ELL
Specialists or ELL Asst.
Principal will observe
each classroom (ELA I,
ELA II, Algebra,
Biology, and US
History) at a minimum
of once a semester to
observe Sheltered
Instruction strategies
Provide professional development and in class support from ELL Instructional Specialists and Asst. Principal to help teacher with ELL strategies implementation and provide feedback/conversations/coaching. Although ongoing, dates for feedback after ELL support are November 1, March 12, and June 4).
38 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
being utilized and
offer feedback.
Teachers will complete QTEL training for Sheltered Instruction by April 2018.
Schedule all ELL students in appropriately proficiency leveled ELA courses and Newcomers in Sheltered core courses for English, math, science, and social studies.
Strategically schedule all YE and YX (Parent Permission) ELL students in appropriate level determined by the LPAC and previous TELPAS scores in ELA courses. Strategically schedule all Newcomers in appropriate Sheltered Instruction ELL World Geography, World History, Algebra, Algebra II, Biology, Reading, and Environmental Systems. Provide Professional Development on differentiation and strategies for these specific courses. Provide teachers with the HISD ELL Supplemental Manual (strategies and activities content
ELL Instructional
Specialists (G.
Gonzalez & J.
Moretti) and ELL
Assistant Principal (A.
Torres) will verify
student schedules.
Grade level AP’s will schedule students.
Master Schedule collaboration and Scheduling in Chancery by Asst. Principal. ELL Supplemental Manuals and Professional Development provided by ELL Instructional Specialists and Asst. Principal.
Ensure students are
scheduled
appropriately by
completing schedule
audits by the end of
the second week of
school;
Within the first 4 weeks of school, all teachers will have been provided the ELL Supplemental Manual. And attended at least one ELL professional development. On-going evaluation of student schedules with new enrollment.
Sheltered Instruction teachers will acknowledge receipt of the ELL Supplemental Manual by October 20 and attend at least 6 hours of professional development related to ELLs during the school year. Teachers “Class Status Rosters” will be ran each semester or more to ensure all students in the courses are identified as ELLs.
39 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
specific) for the sheltered courses.
Overall ELL passing on
STAAR for ELA I will
be 40%, ELA II 35%,
Algebra 40%, Biology
55%, and US History
70% or higher.
TELPAS – 60%
Increase One Level or
meet Advanced High
Composite
Develop awareness of
ELL teacher’s
awareness of past
STAAR and TELPAS
data on retesters;
Target retesters for
after-school and
Saturday tutorials.
Provide professional
development for
teachers on how to
locate STAAR and
TELPAS data on their
students.
ELA Sheltered ELL
Teachers will inform
students and have
them use a tracking
chart/diagram “Goal
Chart” for their past
TELPAS results in
order for students to
set a goal to achieve
one level or more
higher in the domains
of listening, Speaking,
Reading, Writing, and
the Composite.
ELL Instructional Specialist G. Gonzalez & J. Moretti) and ELL Assistant Principal (A. Torres)
The ELL IS’s and ELL
Asst. Principal will
provide professional
development and
continued support for
teacher’s on
identifying the ELL
student STAAR and
TELPAS data.
ELL IS’s will work with teachers to create a list, assignment, and advertisement for after-school and Saturday tutorials for the STAAR test subjects. ELLs will be invited to objective-driven tutorials based on their performance and needs for STAAR assessments.
Within the first month
of teachers reporting
to the campus, a
professional
development for
locating ELLs in their
class, their past STAAR
and TELPAS data will
be delivered.
By October 2nd, the
after-school and
Saturday tutorial list,
assignment, and
advertisement will be
implemented by the
ELL IS’s.
By October 2nd, ELA
ELL Sheltered
Instruction teachers
will inform and help
students to chart their
results and Goals.
All students will be informed of
their testing status and the
tutorial dates by October 2nd.
Advertisements and sign in-sheets
will be utilized.
Students in ELA ELL Sheltered
Instruction classes will have
created a TELPAS “Goal Chart” by
October 2nd.
Sign-in sheets for Professional
Development ELL STAAR/TELPAS
data will be obtained.
40 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 3: Special Populations: Special Education
Priority Need: Improve STAAR performance in English I, English II, Algebra I, Biology and US History
Critical Success Factor(s): On-going professional development in instructional practices , PLCs
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
25% or higher increase in Level 2 and 3 performance on STAAR and STAAR On-Line
Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
Increase literacy by the implementation of Achieve 3000 in the classroom and Kurzweil in classrooms and on campus based assessment
Achieve 300 and Kurzweil Professional Development conducted in core content PLCs, After-School, and during Early Release for ELA I, ELA II, Algebra I, Biology, and US History teachers; Ongoing monitoring of usage.
Special Ed Instructional Specialist (Robin Nuber) and Special Ed Instructional Specialist (Beth Stengler); Special Education Co-Teachers; all teachers with students requiring testing accommodations
Achieve 30000 Kurzweil HISD Special Education Dept. Professional Development; Professional Development delivered by SPED Instructional Specialist and Asst. Principal; Monitoring by Special Ed Co-teachers.
Achieve 300 and Kurzweil training conducted during in-service first 2 weeks for teachers; 1 PLC offered each month starting September thru November. Open Labs for teachers during conference periods by request. Teachers will sign in for training. SPED Specialist or SPED Asst. Principal will observe each classroom (ELA I, ELA II, Algebra, Biology, and US History) at a minimum of once a semester during the administration of common assessments/district assessments to observe
Provide ongoing support and feedback to help teachers to consistently incorporate Achieve 3000 and Kurzweil into lesson planning; 100% of students will have Achieve 3000 and Kurzweil downloaded on to their computers by the end of the first 6 weeks; 100% of STAAR A students will have used Achieve 3000 and Kurzweil by the end of the Fall semester.
41 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
usage of Achieve 3000 and Kurzweil and offer feedback. Co-Teachers will monitor usage of Achieve 3000 and Kurzweil in assigned classrooms.
Decrease SPED failure rate in core content classes.
Maximize alignment of case management support with Co-teacher support to monitor student performance. Ongoing monitoring of grades, communication with parents, collaboration between general and special ed teachers. Conduct classroom observations to observe implementation of accommodations and interventions provided to students.
Special Ed Instructional Specialist (Robin Nuber) and Special Ed Instructional Specialist (Beth Stengler); Special Education Case Managers
Special Education Failure Plan, Common planning and conference periods for general and special education teachers; ongoing collaboration between teachers. Professional development in instructional strategies to increase student performance. Students at-risk for failing will be assigned tutorials.
Within first 3 weeks of school teachers will receive accommodations for SPED students. Students will be provided with a list of their individual accommodations. Case Managers will obtain student grades every 2nd and 5th week of grading cycles. Students failing will meet with Asst. Principal and Case Manager to develop an intervention plan. Students will check in with case manager weekly, beginning September 6. Tutorial logs will be collected monthly by SPED IS. Provide feedback to teachers on classroom observations.
SPED Students at risk for failing at the time of progress reports will have an intervention plan in place; Teachers will receive ongoing support on intervention strategies; Sped failures will be reviewed at the end of each 6 weeks-the following 6 weeks, we will look for a decrease in failures from the previous 6 weeks; consecutive 6 weeks failures will decrease by at least 10 individual students per consecutive 6-weeks when compared to the 2016-2017 school year.
42 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Overall SPED passing on STAAR for ELA I will be 25%, ELA II 30%, Algebra 25%, Biology 40%, and US History 60% or higher.
Develop awareness of past STAAR data on retesters; Target retesters for after-school and Saturday tutorials. Provide professional development for teachers on how to locate STAAR and data on their students. Co- Teachers will collaborate with teachers to track students’ performance on benchmarks and common assessments to determine where support is needed.
Special Ed Instructional Specialist (Robin Nuber) and Special Ed Instructional Specialist (Beth Stengler); Special Education Co-Teachers.
The SPED IS and SPED Asst. Principal will provide professional development and continued support for teachers on identifying the SPED student STAAR data.
SPED IS will work with Co-teachers to create a list, assignment, and advertisement for after-school and Saturday tutorials for the STAAR test subjects. SPED students will be invited to objective-driven tutorials based on their performance and needs for STAAR assessments.
Special education students will be scheduled in appropriate classes with co-teacher and/ or in-class support. By October 1st, the after-school and Saturday tutorial list, assignment, and advertisement will be implemented by the SPED IS. By October 1st, SPED co-teacher pairs will inform and help students to chart their results and Goals.
All students will be informed of their testing status and the tutorial dates by October 1st. Advertisements and sign in-sheets will be utilized. Case Managers will identify re-testers by October 4th. Co-teachers will monitor student progress on STAAR objectives each 6 weeks.
43 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
GOAL AREA 3: Special Populations: Advanced Academics/GT
Priority Need: Increase dual credit enrollment and number of students earning concurrent college and high school credit; improve AP test scores.
Critical Success Factor(s): Dual credit enrollment; On-going data analysis of dual credit-tested standards across the program to prepare students for course success; on-going data analysis of AP-tested standards across the AP program to prepare students for the AP Exams.
Goal and Summative Evaluation:
Students will have a 95% or higher passing rate in dual credit courses; GT students enrolled in AP classes will achieve a 3 or higher on the AP test; Overall AP test scores will increase by 20% of students receiving 3’s or higher.
44 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Measurable Objective Strategy Title of Staff Member Responsible
Resources – include funding sources (i.e.
GT, Title 1, State Comp. Ed., Bilingual/ESL,
Special Ed., CTE, etc.)
Timeline Milestones/ Formative Evaluation
Increase student enrollment in dual credit courses by 100%
Recruit potential students through data tracking and face-to-face interviews; conduct parent-student forums to disseminate program information, requirements, and expectations.
Assistant principal over advanced academics.
HCC student support services (library, computer labs, tutoring)
Students are enrolled in HCC dual credit courses by August 11th, 2017; ongoing communications between Sam Houston dual credit teachers and HCC teachers and liaisons.
Completed dual credit scheduling by August 25th, 2017 indicating 100% dual credit enrollment increase, progress report checks every six weeks, report card reviews every six weeks.
GT students achieve a 3 of higher on AP tests; All AP test scores will increase over the next 3 years of growth with a 20% increase of students scoring a 3 or over the next 3 years. Last year’s data showed that 13% of
AP released tests will be
given at the beginning,
middle, and end of year
to track progress; AP
released tests for each
content area will be
used to track the growth
of GT students; Use
Inference strategies and
document analysis to
increase rigor in class;
Use student data to open
Assistant principal over advanced academics and AP team.
Rice University advanced placement summer trainings; released AP Exams and AP questions; NMSI trainings for Math, Science and ELA teachers; 9 Saturday Tutorial sessions for AP Students/Teachers
AP released tests will be
given at Beginning,
middle, and end of year;
Teachers will monitor
data and collaborate
during Monthly AP
PLCs to modify
upcoming lessons;
Teachers will focus on
higher level thinking
skills using Webb’s
depth of knowledge
matrix.
After 2 grading cycles,
AP teachers will have
data checks to discuss
which students are not
on track to meet the goal
of a 3; individual plans
will be developed for
students; for GT
students who are
struggling, GT growth
plans will be put in
place.
45 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
students achieved a 3 or better.
new potential AP
classes.
who are a part of the NMSI program.
46 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
SIP Part 3: Special Funding Goals
Goal Area: Title I, Part A – 10 Required Components of Schoolwide Planning 1. Comprehensive Needs Assessment All data were reviewed for all students and student groups to identify
areas of strength and areas of need in terms of student achievement, staff development, and parent
involvement in relation to the state academic content standards and the state student academic achievement
standards.
• Briefly summarize your campus’ needs as identified in your Comprehensive Needs
Assessment. After reviewing both qualitative and quantitative data, we have identified specific needs in the areas of
Special Education and ELL. Our data shows that these student groups perform lower than other student
groups and that more support structures need to be put in places so that we can monitor these students and
create intervention plans for them, when necessary.
• Indicate the programs and resources that are being purchased out of Title I funds.
i. Partial funding of the campus reading lab.
2. Schoolwide Reform Strategies List at least four (4) campus-specific, schoolwide reform strategies that
will provide opportunities for all students to meet the advanced and proficient levels of student
achievement. Strategies are based on evidence-based research to increase achievement for each sub-group
on state tests.
• Use of Kurzweil for special education students
• Adjusted PLC framework based on campus needs will include data review, intervention needs, best
practices, teacher modeling, and meaningful planning time.
• Use of restorative justice practices through on-going professional development opportunities and
adjusted during PLC’s and individual conferences.
• On-going professional development that focuses on high-impact instructional strategies, especially
those to be used with Special Education and ELL students.
• Houston MSTC New Teacher Academy that is supported by district literacy team.
3. Instruction by Effective Teachers State the campus’ strategies to ensure that 100 percent of your teachers
and paraprofessionals are effective teachers.
• Due to a campus need to improve literacy as demonstrated in STAAR ELA data, all contents will
participate in implementing the best practices and strategies of Literacy Empowered. This on-
going professional development will be reflected in PLC work and campus professional
development days. New teachers will be further supported in this initiative by the district literacy
team. Sam Houston has campus-based instructional specialists that serve as primary teacher
coaches for the teaching staff.
• Appraisers will closely align classroom observation feedback to teachers with the instructional
practice and professional expectations rubric provided by the district. In addition to celebrating
classroom successes, feedback will be based around providing a statement of the expectation, and
explanation of the impact on student learning, and action steps and/or strategies to implement.
• Implementation of CHAMPS program through pre-service training and ongoing professional
development that will develop an instructional structure that fosters student motivation and
responsibility while informing teachers of how to give students strategies that will directly impact
their success in the classroom.
4. High-Quality and Ongoing Professional Development Explain the process to provide high-quality and
ongoing professional development for teachers, paraprofessionals and other staff members. Professional
47 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
development must include the goals and objectives of the schoolwide plan, and receive the sustained, high-
quality professional development required to implement them.
• Process of high-quality professional development: Professional Development will be aligned
to campus needs (as identified in our comprehensive needs assessment) and will also be provided
to teachers who are implementing a specific program or curriculum to ensure that they are
supported in order to be able to implement the program with fidelity.
• Process of ongoing professional development:
Staff is surveyed to identify areas in which staff development is needed; Staff members are able
to participate in professional development aligned to their content area and their IPDP; Staff
members participate in professional development during designated district early release days;
Instructional Specialists, Administrators, and Lead Teachers will collaborate in order to create,
plan, develop and deliver professional development that is aligned to observed campus needs,
needs as indicated by the staff, and aligned to areas identified in our campus needs assessment.
5. Strategies to Attract and Retain Effective Teachers to High-Need Schools Describe strategies used to
retain and attract effective teachers.
• Strategies to retain Effective teachers:
i. Survey teachers and solicit their feedback when making decisions
ii. Provide leadership and growth opportunities through teacher leader opportunities and
professional development.
iii. Consider how best to utilize effective teachers when determining teaching schedules.
• Strategies to attract Effective teachers:
i. Build stronger links between the school and the community through activities such as the
community tour during pre-service week.
ii. Use staff members as ambassadors at teacher recruitment events.
iii. During interview processes, ask teachers about their own views in order to create autonomy
and the social relevance of teaching, correct any misconceptions about the teaching
profession, the school or the district as necessary, and emphasize that promotional
programs in education are a future option.
6. Strategies to Increase Parental Involvement Identify at least four (4) strategies specific to your campus
to increase parental involvement activities.
• Facilitate a series of parent-student class meetings at the beginning of the year to introduce parents
to their students’ administrative and support teams as well as to familiarize them with school
policies and procedures.
• Utilize the parent center to host workshops on various educational topics such as House Bill 5,
STAAR testing, etc.
• Hold monthly meetings (Coffee with the Principal) to update parents on school events and allow a
forum for parents to discuss concerns
• Encourage the development of parent support groups for extracurricular activities such as athletics,
dance groups, or ROTC off-campus events.
7. Ensure Smooth Transition for Students (SECONDARY) Identify transition activities for students as
they enter each level (intermediate, middle, high school) and as students exit special programs (e.g.
Bilingual, ESL & Special Education).
• Transition activities: We work with feeder schools to encourage incoming 9th graders students to
join programs and activities (i.e., freshman football camp, band camp, etc…). The 9th grade
admin team holds a parent/student event to help ensure a smoother transition to high school.
ELL students will be scheduled into ESL classes for core contents at the freshman level
to help improve language acquisition.
48 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
8. Measures to Include Teachers in Decisions Regarding the Use of Academic Assessments In addition
to state performance data, describe measures to include teachers in making decisions about academic
assessments in order to provide information on, and to improve, the achievement of individual students and
the overall instructional program.
• Describe measures:
Teachers collaborate in order to create their own campus-based assessments. Prior to district
assessments, teachers review the blueprints of the assessments to ensure their instruction is
aligned to ensure the objectives on the upcoming assessment have been taught. Teachers
will be invited to work with the district to write and/or revise district assessments.
9. Effective, Timely Additional Assistance Address activities to identify and ensure effective, timely
assistance for all students not meeting state standards.
• Process to identify students:
When STAAR data is released, the instructional leadership team disaggregates the data in
multiple ways to identify areas of need. Through PLCs, teachers are informed of their students
who did not meet state standards. In addition to receiving a comprehensive list of students not
meeting state standards, they are informed of how to access historical student testing information
via A4E and Chancery.
• Activities to ensure effective and timely assistance:
Once students have been identified, students will be scheduled into STAAR review classes prior
to the start of school. Since our current capacity does not allow for all students to be scheduled
into a STAAR review class, other interventions are put in place to ensure all retesters receive
appropriate interventions. Instructional specialists will work with their teachers to ensure teachers
provide remediation on the skills that students did not master. Both retesting students and
students who are testing for the first time will be assessed throughout the year on STAAR skills
and will be targeted for weekly objective-driven tutorials. All teachers will create individualized
student intervention plans for students who do not master state standards. Data will be regularly
analyzed to ensure student intervention plans are current, and that reteach plans are developed.
10. Coordination and Integration of Federal, State and Local Services Programs State the strategies to
coordinate programs/services/funds under ESSA to upgrade the entire educational program and increase
student achievement while ensuring that the intent and purpose of each program has been met.
• Strategies to increase program effectiveness:
We will carefully review student performance data to determine out needs prior to expending any
funds. Funding will be used to provide instructional support that advances academic achievement
through interventions, tutorials, and professional development. We will monitor and adjust our
programs and services to make sure they are proving effective and efficient in meeting our goals.
Our Business Manager will request rationale related to our state goals. Our Title I Coordinator,
Associate Principal, and Principal will monitor the effectiveness of programs and services.
49 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Positions Funded Out of Title I Funds
(Please indicate the quantity of each position selected for the school year.)
1 Parent Engagement Rep
Tutor, Academic (Hourly)
Tutor, Associate (Hourly)
Tutor, Sr. Academic
Counselor (must have rationale that shows
duties are supplemental to the regular
school program)
Social Worker (must have rationale that
shows duties are supplemental to the
regular school program)
Psychologist (must have rationale that
shows duties are supplemental to the
regular school program)
1 Coach, Graduation HS
Teacher, Intervention (Hourly)
All grade levels - [General]
Teacher, Intervention (Hourly)
All grade levels – [Math]
Teacher, Intervention (Hourly)
All grade levels – [Reading]
Teacher, Intervention (Hourly)
All grade levels – [Science]
4 Teacher, Intervention [General]
All grade levels (Cannot be primary teacher of
record)
Teacher, Intervention [Math]
All grade levels (Cannot be primary teacher of
record)
Teacher, Intervention [Reading]
All grade levels (Cannot be primary teacher of
record)
Teacher, Intervention [Science]
All grade levels (Cannot be primary teacher of
record)
4 *Teacher, Class-Size Reduction [General]
All secondary grade levels
*Teacher, Class-Size Reduction [Bilingual]
All elementary grade levels
*Teacher, Class-Size Reduction [ESL]
All elementary grade levels
*Teacher, Class-Size Reduction [All core content
areas]
All secondary grade levels
50 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Indicate “Yes” or “No” below if your campus’ Title I funds will be utilized to fund the following items:
Item Yes or No
1. In-State Travel
2. Out-of-State Travel
3. Professional Development
4. Field Lessons
5. Contracted Services
6. Tutoring
7. Materials and Supplies
Capital Outlay Requested (Y/N)?
If yes, please list the items below. Please note, all capital outlay requests must receive approval from TEA
prior to purchase.
51 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
Goal Area: Mandated Health Services
1. Immunization Monitoring Person Responsible for monitoring immunization requirements, data entry, and state reporting requirements: Person Responsible for monitoring immunization requirements, data entry, and state reporting requirements: Joy Babb, RN (School Nurse) & Leticia Villarreal (Data Entry) If your campus does not have a certified school nurse or screener, please explain how you will complete this on or before October 30, 2015 (include an estimate of number of students that must be screened): n/a
2. Vision Screening at Grades: PK, K, 1, 3, 5, 7 Person Responsible for screening, data entry, completing referral forms, and submitting state report: n/a If your campus does not have a certified school nurse or screener, please explain how you will complete this on or before December 4, 2015 (include an estimate of number of students that must be screened): n/a
3. Hearing Screening at Grades: PK, K, 1, 3, 5, 7 Person Responsible for screening, data entry, completing referral forms, and submitting state report: n/a If your campus does not have a certified school nurse or screener, please explain how you will complete this on or before December 4, 2015 (include an estimate of number of students that must be screened): n/a
4. Type 2 Diabetes Screening at Grades: 1, 3, 5, 7 Person Responsible for screening, data entry, completing referral forms, and submitting state report: If your campus does not have a certified school nurse or screener, please n/a explain how you will complete this on or before December 4, 2015 (include an estimate of number of students that must be screened): n/a
5. Spinal Screening at Grades: 6, 9 Person Responsible for screening, data entry, completing referral forms, and submitting state report: Joy Babb, RN If your campus does not have a certified school nurse or screener, please explain how you will complete this on or before February 1, 2016 (include an estimate of number of students that must be screened): n/a.
52 9/29/2017 1:12 PM
6. Medication Administration Person Responsible for administering medication including, but not limited to emergency care of students with diabetes, seizures, and life threatening anaphylaxis: Joy Babb, RN; and teachers are trained if they are taking students on a field trip and notify one of us that one of their students going on the field has a medical condition warranting scheduled or possible emergency medication during the field trip. If your campus does not have a certified school nurse, please explain your rationale for not providing this service and how you will meet this ongoing student support need for the school year of 2015-2016: n/a
7. AED (Automated External Defibrillators) Monthly Maintenance Check Person certified in CPR/AED who is responsible for conducting monthly maintenance check for all AEDs and submitting report to Health and Medical Services annually. Click here to enter text. If your campus does not have an individual certified in CPR/AED who is conducting this monthly, please explain your rationale and how you will meet this requirement for the 2017 – 2018 school year. (Include the number of AEDs on campus: Click here to enter text.
School Improvement Plan SharePoint Site Uploads
The following documents are uploaded to the School Improvement Plan SharePoint Site separately:
1. The School Improvement Plan– only upload one time, after your SSO has approved it Please use the following naming convention: School name, SIP 2017-2018
2. The Executive Summary - This summary is submitted to the HISD Board of Education as part of the public hearing, at which time the Board votes on approval of the SIP. Please use the following naming convention: School name, Executive Summary 2017-2018
The Executive Summary gives a brief description of the school’s culture and ongoing developments by
condensing the more detailed reports in the SIP. The following information must also be included:
▪ The title, school name, principal's name, and administrative District; ▪ A brief description of the school, students, and community; ▪ A description of the areas in need of improvement (based on analysis of data in the needs
assessment) that will be addressed in the SIP; ▪ A list of all measurable objectives, which should match those presented in Part 2 of the SIP; and ▪ A brief description of the major initiatives or strategies that will be implemented.
3. The completed Signature Page – including SSO and Chief’s signatures Please use the following naming convention: School name, Signature Page 2017-2018
53 9/29/2017 1:12 PM