Scholar Handbook - cwu. 2 . Preface “Cogita tute ... Your mentor and the McNair Scholars Program will

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Text of Scholar Handbook - cwu. 2 . Preface “Cogita tute ... Your mentor and the McNair Scholars...

  • The McNair Scholars Program is funded by a grant from the U.S. Congress through the U.S. Dept. of Education

    Scholar Handbook

  • 2

    Preface

    “Cogita tute, think for yourself,” Michael Shermer quips in Why People Believe Weird Things (1997). Think for yourself, but develop critical thinking skills for evaluating that thinking. How do you develop those skills? Your mentor and the McNair Scholars Program will strive to be good external examples of critical analysis, and then you can work on internalizing what you find useful. Like the medieval philosopher, William of Ockham, you must shave away what is unnecessary, until the simplest and adequate explanation remains. This idea or approach, known as Ockham’s Razor, can be used for your personal intellectual development, and should certainly be used in your research. Remember that the easiest person to deceive is often you.

    1. The McNair Scholars Program

    Brief biography of Ronald E. McNair

    Born on October 21, 1950, in Lake City, South Carolina, McNair was the son of Carl C. McNair, Sr., and Pearl M. McNair. He achieved early success in the segregated public schools he attended, as both a student and an athlete. Valedictorian of his high school class, he attended North Carolina A&T State University where, in 1971, he received a B.S. degree in physics. He went on to study physics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he specialized in quantum electronics and laser technology, completing his Ph.D. in 1977. As a student, he performed some of the earliest work on chemical HF/DF and high-pressure CO lasers, publishing groundbreaking scientific papers on the subject.

    McNair was also a physical fitness advocate and pursued athletic training from an early age. He was a leader in track and football at his high school. He also became a black belt in karate, and while in graduate school began offering karate classes at St. Paul's AME Church in Cambridge, Massachusetts. He also participated in several karate tournaments, taking more than

  • 3

    30 trophies in these competitions. In addition, Ronald was an accomplished saxophone player, a testament to his well-rounded development.

    While involved in these activities, McNair met and married Cheryl B. Moore of Brooklyn, New York, and they later had two children. After completing his Ph.D. he began working as a physicist at the Optical Physics Department of Hughes Research Laboratories in Malibu, California, and conducted research on electro-optic laser modulation for satellite-to- satellite space communications.

    This research led McNair into close contact with the space program for the first time, and when the opportunity presented itself, he applied for astronaut training. In January 1978, NASA selected him to enter the astronaut cadre, one of the first three Black Americans selected. McNair became the second Black American in space between February 3 and 11, 1984, by flying on the Challenger shuttle mission, STS-41-B.

    On January 28th, 1986, Ronald McNair began his second shuttle mission. Seventy three seconds after its takeoff, the world watched in horror as the shuttle exploded. From this great tragedy came a tremendous legacy and the creation of the Ronald E McNair Post- Baccalaureate Program. “Before you can make a dream come true, you must first have one.” Ronald McNair demonstrated that obstacles can be overcome, and that if we can dream it, we can achieve it. It is this spirit of hope and achievement that characterizes the McNair Scholars Program. Program History

    The development of a program for preparing first-generation college students was already in place before the Challenger disaster. The Department of Education wanted to level the playing field, so to speak, for populations underrepresented in graduate education. A call for grant proposals went out and in 1986, 14 original grants were awarded. Now 187 institutions in the US and Puerto Rico have McNair programs. The McNair program at CWU has provided support and mentoring since it began in 1991.

    Program Goals

    The McNair Scholars Program is designed to prepare participants for doctoral studies through involvement in mentored research and other scholarly activities. The participants are selected from highly qualified university undergraduates who are first-generation and low- income, or ethnic minorities underrepresented in higher education. A major reason for assisting McNair scholars to prepare for and gain their PhDs, is so that they can go on to become faculty members, role models and mentors for other students from underrepresented groups. As a result, these students will be more likely to graduate from a university, and, universities will better reflect the ethnic and social diversity of the American population.

    The McNair Scholars Program is funded by the Department of Education, and funding is contingent on successful implementation of these goals. The Central Washington University McNair Scholars Program also receives support from the Office of Graduate Studies. 2. The Mentor Relationship

    The mentoring relationship and the research growing out of it are at the heart of the McNair program. Throughout the mentor/mentee relationship there will be obstacles, milestones and turning points, setbacks and unexpected delights. This relationship can often be described through the use of a metaphor of a “journey.”

    There are several reasons why it is useful to view the mentoring process as a journey. First, a journey is an active pursuit, not scripted. Second, a journey is a personal construct.

  • 4

    The scholar has a role in the direction of the journey, its pace, and its practical implications. The mentor provides the map and subsequent direction, but the scholar must interpret the map and change it when necessary. In this sense, the mentor is a facilitator of the journey, not a leader. Third, the mentor and the scholar have personal and thus different journey paths that cross for the learning experience. It is important to differentiate, or at least recognize, the difference between those paths very early in the relationship. If the scholar just departs on the same journey as the mentor, the learning will be formulaic, and the process will be one of cloning, not of facilitation.

    This section of the manual will look at the mentor and scholar relationship and how it can be fostered. It is informed from several sources that are listed in the Reference section.

    Summer Internships/Exprience are a major part of your McNair experience. In addition to actively undertaking research on a particular topic, you will also have the opportunity to develop a mentor/protégé relationship with a faculty member. We encourage your mentor to (adapted from Adams and Adams, 1993):

    1. Meet with you regularly to discuss your progress and any possible problems. 2. Direct the research project, especially initially when you will need advice about relevant

    publications and appropriate methods to consider. 3. Help you to meet your goals by developing your research skills in ways that are

    discipline specific (computer database searches, field/laboratory methods, data analysis, problem-solving techniques, writing, etc.) and providing guidance and feedback on drafts.

    4. Hold you to a high standard of work, to help you to learn and develop as a professional. 5. Introduce you to people and opportunities that will further your career goals and build

    networks. 6. Share relevant aspects of their career and some of the resulting lessons/advice. Your role as protégé is equally important, and involves a large number of responsibilities. As

    a protégé, you should (adapted from Adams and Adams, 1993): 1. Demonstrate that you are willing and ready to be mentored. 2. Demonstrate your desire to learn, and a willingness to work hard. 3. Initiate regular meetings to discuss your work and present a ‘progress report’ (what you

    have done, where you have encountered difficulties, what you need, etc.). 4. Respect your mentor’s time and knowledge. Be prepared for classes and meetings so that

    the time you have together will be productive for both of you. Take good notes. 5. Focus on tasks outlined by your mentor, and listen carefully to instructions and

    constructive criticism, so that you do each job well (“look, listen and learn”). 6. Respect privileges that you might be given (access to phones, copy machines, computers,

    etc.). 7. Develop a plan and stick to it. If that becomes impossible, then revise the timeline with

    more realistic dates by which to accomplish your goals. 8. Take time to observe others, accept advice, build your reputation and respect as you

    develop your skills, rather than trying to show that you know-it-all now (which is certainly not the case).

    9. Ask questions, but only when you and your mentor have time to discuss the answers.

    While most mentors benefit greatly from the mentoring relationship, it is likely that you (the student protégé) have the most to gain from the experience. As a result, it is very important that you respect your mentor for devoting extra time and energy to you and your research. The

  • 5

    relationship that you build could last throughout your career, and you may find yourself asking previous mentors for advice, letters of recommendation for jobs, promotions, etc. Students who have mentors tend to advance faster in their careers, because of the extra training, preparation and encouragemen