12
Schenker, Inc. Environmental and Supply Chain Considerations in Planning Large Scale Construction Projects 10 June 2008

Schenker, Inc. Environmental and Supply Chain Considerations in Planning Large Scale Construction Projects 10 June 2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Schenker, Inc.

Environmental and Supply Chain Considerations in Planning Large Scale

Construction Projects

10 June 2008

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 2

Structure of Today’s presentation

Drivers

Resistors

Supply Chain

Costs

Project Complexity

Fixed Schedule

Marine Rail Heavy Truck Air

Modal Environmental Impact

Geography

Technology

Drivers

Resistors

Supply Chain

CostsSupply Chain

Costs

Project ComplexityProject Complexity

Fixed ScheduleFixed Schedule

Marine Rail Heavy Truck Air

Modal Environmental Impact

Marine Rail Heavy Truck Air

Modal Environmental Impact

GeographyGeography

TechnologyTechnology

What’s driving the change agenda?

1. Improve logistics planning early in the project management cycle to reflect effect of environmental issues on mode choice decisions.

2. Increase use of the Athabaska Northern Railway Ltd. (CN Rail) line – use domestic containers operating in a closed loop between Edmonton and construction sites in Fort McMurray area.

3. Adapt carrier selection criteria to include environmental considerations on fuel management and GHG emission controls.

Watch use of bio-fuels (“good”and “bad”sources)

4. Go paperless – electronic invoices and EFT

5. Select terminal/warehouse operators considering their “green”programs. Facility design Energy management Water management Waste management

What can we do now?

“Competition”

“Conventional” “Proprietary!”

“Public Policy”

No. of Years of Project ActivityLearning curve, develop support infrastructure

No. of ProjectsUnderway in RegionCompetition for infrastructure

Few

Many

1-2 5-50

CONTEXT MAP

What’s the business context?

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 3

What’s driving the change agenda?

Drivers

Considerations Project Complexity

Fixed ScheduleGeography

Technology

Supply Chain

CostsMarine Rail Truck Air

Modal Energy and GHG Impact

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 4

But Large Scale Construction Projects Have a Life of Their Own

Time Definite economic value of coming on stream on schedule supply constraints – mix of long-lead items (ETO), JIT/off-the-shelf, opportunity cost of failing to meet schedule, which affects technology decisions (tried & true vs new, leading edge)

Processing Technology selection impacts construction strategy - whether constructed on site or

modularized off-site affects sourcing decisions, which affects transportation decisions

Geographic Specific – ie. Where resources are infrastructure access to site governs modal choice both for

finished/processed goods and inbound equipment and materials E.g. upgraders located in Fort McMurray area or in Edmonton area

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 5

And Companies Have to Consider the Business Context

“Competition”

“Conventional” “Proprietary!”

“Public Policy”

No. of Years of Project ActivityLearning curve, develop support infrastructure

No. of ProjectsUnderway in RegionCompetition for infrastructure

Few

Many

1-2 5-50

CONTEXT MAP

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 6

Then recognize that our transport mode choices affect the environment

Source: Energy Use Data Handbook, 1990-2005, Transportation Tables 8 and 9.

Relative Standing in Energy and GHG Emissions by Mode

1.0 1.5

7.5

16.1

1.01.6

7.6

15.3

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

16.0

18.0

Air Heavy Trucks Rail Marine

Tim

es (

x) b

ette

r th

an A

ir

Energy Efficiency

Improvement in GHG Emmissions

“Better”

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 7

For the most part – projects are concerned with modal combinations

Road

Ocean-Rail-RoadVia west coast ports

Ocean-Rail-Road via Gulf Coast

Ocean-Rail-RoadVia east coast ports/St Lawrence Seaway

Air-Road

Rail-Road

Sourcing decisions:- AsiaPac- Europe and Baltic States- The Americas

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 8

But it Does Boil Down to the Last Mile – Rail vs Road?

What strategies to employ?Consolidate loadsIncrease vehicle weights & dimensionsTwin Highway 63Pre-position inventory in advance of constructionMake better use of rail access

ANYLWRCNRCPR

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 9

And, Road Infrastructure Needs Upgrading

Alberta Government will invest $530 million on road infrastructure in support of oil sands development Hwy 63

Twin Hwy 63 from Suncor Access north of Fort McMurray to Fort Mackay

Twin Hwy 63 from Fort McMurray south to junction with Hwy 881

Add 25 km of passing lanes between junction of Hwy 881 and Hwy 55 Build four interchanges within Fort McMurray on Hwy 63 Complete paving of Hwy 881 Build a commercial vehicle staging area on Hwy 881 near Conklin. Lac Laloche Road from Saskatchewan to Anzac AB

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 10

We need to remember what costs we are talking about….

$ Cost

Volume/Shipment Size

Transportation

Warehousing & Handling

Air Truck Rail Marine Pipeline

Total Logistics Cost

Add in Environmental Costs

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 11

Consider alternatives - direct delivery vs a staged delivery….

$ Cost

Volume/Shipment SizeAir Truck Rail

Add in Environmental Costs

Cost = either truck or rail+handling

Vs portfolio of direct and staged deliveries

The Integrated Logistics Group Slide 12

What can we do now?

1. Improve logistics planning early in the project management cycle to reflect effect of environmental issues on mode choice and direct delivery vs staged deliveries decisions.

2. Increase use of the Athabaska Northern Railway Ltd. (CN Rail) line – use domestic containers operating in a closed loop between Edmonton and construction sites in Fort McMurray area.

3. Adapt carrier selection criteria to include environmental considerations on fuel management and GHG emission controls.

Watch use of bio-fuels (“good” and “bad” sources)

4. Go paperless – electronic invoices and EFT

5. Select terminal/warehouse operators considering their “green” programs. Facility design Energy management Water management Waste management