Upload
gaige-forde
View
222
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SC SERVTRANS INVEST SASC SERVTRANS INVEST SAZILELE FEROVIARE - BUCURESTI, 17-18 October 2006ZILELE FEROVIARE - BUCURESTI, 17-18 October 2006
The Priv
ate Freight
The Priv
ate Freight
Railways O
perato
rs
Railways O
perato
rs
Starting with 2000 the Railway Operators with private capital had been established. In the present, on the Romanian railway good transport market acts a number of 27 operators, from which: 22 –for goods, 2 – for passengers and 1 – for goods and passengers.
Because the OTF (Private Operators with private capital) appeared, the structure of the transport system is presenting, as follows:
Constructions, Tourism and Transport Ministry
SNTFM-CFR MARFA SA
SNTFC-CFR CALATORI SA
CNCF-CFR SA
OTF with private capital ….
SERVTRANS INVEST SA ……
Legislation + rules
AFERState InspectionsThe Traffic Circulation ControlTransport Registry Certificates and diplomasAuthorizations and degrees for transport personnel
GRAPHIC OF CERTIFICATED RAILWAYS OPERATORS
0 0 0 0
42 1
4 5
10
6
1210
23
27
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
RAILWAYTRANSPORTLICENSES
SAFETYCERTIFICATES
These 27 private companies were transported in 2005 - 22% from the total of the transported goods on the Romanian Rail Ways.
Goods transported on the Romanian Rail Ways- % -
Transported goods by OTF
22 %14.682 mil.
transported tons
Transported goods by CFR Marfa SA
78 %52.057 mil.
transported tons
GRAPHIC OF TRANSPORTED GOODS IN THE PERIOD 2000 - 2005
71461
0
72578
847
70654
2610
71411
2714
63579
10245
52057
14682
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
SNTFM CFR MARFA
OTF - Railway TransportOperators
The structure of the transported goods on The structure of the transported goods on Rail WaysRail Ways
1. Coal - 41%
2. Petrol products - 13%
3. Carrier products - 5%
4. Common metals and common metal articles - 10%
5. Concrete - 3%
6. Ore - 4%
7. Agriculture products - 4%
8. Chemical products - 4%
9. Other product groups -16% 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
123456789
Current No.
Companies %
1 GFR 33.70
2 Servtrans 22.73
3 Rompetrol 12.12
4 Unifertrans 11.63
5 Classfer 11.24
6 Other 8.58
TOTAL 100.00
33,70%
22,73%12,12%
11,63%
11,24%8,58%
GFR
Servtrans
Rompetrol
Unifertrans
Classfer
Altii
Private Transport Operators at the end Private Transport Operators at the end of 2005of 2005
THE PLUSTHE PLUS
o The structure of Romanian Railway Systems is in accordance with E.U. recommendations.
o The being and licensing procedures of the private companies are accesible and AFER has a very important role, concretized in objectivity and to promote
E.U.-C.E. Directives, in the last 4 years .o CFR SA managed all system, right behavior face off all transport operators,
and has assured equal and free access to infrastructure’s facilities .o We appreciate the open position of SNTFC to requests of private operators,
that means a right behavior on the market, allow many cooperation with private operators, i.e. free depot access, revisions. We consider that was a positive role in free market .
The MinusThe Minus
o Monopoly position of CFR Marfa demonstrates uncooperative position and to limit the access at its facilities which have to be used by the other operators .
o There are ’’ UNWRITTEN ‘’ agreements which obstruct the access of private operators at international transports trough Hungary and Bulgaria.
o The conditioning of clients to work exclusivity with national freight operator .o Discriminatory treatment of railway system than to road transport:
- double taxes, TUI ( access railway taxes) and charging fuel ;- Romania is one of the few European states where the railway system pays ‘’ road taxes ‘’, used for road transport development ;- missing of coherent system of payment for road transport similar with railway system, which, in fact, take on the goods from railway transport in advantage of road transport .
o Different vision regarding the investments in the two mode transports :- The State expenses in road transport are understanding like necessary and assumed by itself ;- in railway transports the same expenses for infrastructure development are perceptible like subventions for covering ‘’ black wholes ‘’ ;
Consequences Consequences
o The Infrastructure is in continuous degradations, closing routes, speed limitation, less capacity which are very difficult managed by CFR SA.That is going to a bad transport for clients, which many times choose the road transport.
Ex. - CET Govora, CET Turceni , CET Turnu Severin, CET Bacau - Salt Industry, Cement Industry which take on 10 million tones/ year ;o We ask Ministry of Transport to involve more than, by ‘’Regulator Body ‘’ in
railway transport market and to correlate all system for transport development in Europe.
Main words are following :‘’ Railway transports in front of road transports ‘’!!!‘’ One Euro input in roads, one Euro input in railway’’ !!!
THANK YOUTHANK [email protected]@servtrans-invest.com