SB Goal: Improved Student Achievement: Accreditation

School Board Work SessionDivision of Academic Affairs

Division of Accountability & Information October 3, 2018

Comparison of AccreditationOld vs. New

2

Current System Single

Measure

New System Multiple

Measures

SOL Results

• SOL Achievement• Graduation Completion Index (GCI)

• SOL Achievement & Progress• Student Group Performance• Chronic Absenteeism• Graduation & Dropout Rate• College, Career & Civic Readiness

10/3/2018

VDOE Philosophy of Accountability

1. Provide comprehensive picture of school quality

2. Drive continuous improvement for all schools

3. Build on strengths and address gaps and unintended outcomes in current system.

10/3/2018 3

School Quality Indicators

• Achievement of All Students Combined Rate for English: Reading and Writing

Combined Rate for Math (Elementary/Middle)

Pass Rate for Math (High)

Pass Rate for Science

• Achievement Gaps English: Reading and Writing Gap Group Combined Rate

Math Gap Group Combined Rate

• Student Engagement Graduation and Completion Index

Dropout Rate

Chronic Absenteeism

College, Career, Civic Readiness

10

/3/2

01

8

4

Application of Indicator Performance to Actions

Accredited• Schools with all quality indicators in the Level 1 (Green) or Level 2 (Yellow).

Accredited with Conditions• Schools with one or more quality indicators in the Level 3 (Red) range.

Accreditation Denied• Schools that fail to implement required corrective actions to address any

Level 3 (Red) school quality indicators– The Board shall deny accreditation for any school that continues to

demonstrate Level Three (Red) performance levels in any school quality indicator due to a failure to implement actions prescribed in a corrective action plan.

New

10/3/2018 5

Percent of Fully Accredited Schools

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

SY 2018-19

SY 2017-18

SY 2016-17

SY 2015-16

SY 2013-14

61%

61%

51%

39%

29%

6Note: Results include paired elementary schools.

10/3/2018

(Based on Data 2012-13)

(Based on Data 2014-15)

(Based on Data 2015-16)

(Based on Data 2016-17)

(Based on Data 2017-18)

School Accreditation Summary

Accreditation Status2014-15 (Based on

2013-14 Data)

2015-16 (Based on

2014-15 Data)

2016-17 (Based on

2015-16 Data)

2017-18 (Based on

2016-17 Data)

2018-19 (Based on

2017-18 Data)

Accredited 13/45 17/44 23/45 27/44 27/44

Accredited with Conditions 17

Accreditation Denied 6 6 15 11

Partially Accredited: Approaching Benchmark Pass Rates

2 1

Partially Accredited: Improving School Pass Rates

4

Partially Accredited: WarnedSchool Pass Rates

25 10 2

Conditionally Accredited, Partially Accredited-Reconstituted

1 5 4 6

Note: Paired Elementary Schools are included in the totals. 710/3/2018

Achievement Summary

IndicatorSchools at Level One

Schools at Level Two

Schools at Level Three

Too Small

English 30 3 11 N/A

Mathematics 30 4 10 N/A

Science 30 1 13 N/A

Academic

IndicatorSchools at Level One

Schools at Level Two

Schools at Level Three

Too Small

English 17 14 13 N/A

Mathematics 13 19 12 N/A

IndicatorSchools at Level One

Schools at Level Two

Schools at Level Three

Too Small

Chronic Absenteeism 30 8 6 N/A

Dropout (HS Only) 2 2 1 N/A

Graduation & Completion 3 2 N/A

Gap

Student Engagement

10/3/2018

New

AccreditationElementary & Secondary Schools

9

2018-2019 Accreditation Results: Elementary Schools

Note: New Rating structure (Level 1, Level 2, Level 3)English: Combines English: Reading (grades 3, 4, 5); Mathematics: Combines Math (Grades 3, 4, 5);Science: Grades 5‘*’ – Level based on a 3 Year Average‘**’ – Elementary Paired School (1st Year 2014-15)Percent passing based on Current Year

9-17-2018 EnglishEnglish

GapMath

Math Gap

ScienceChronic

Absenteeism

School / Data Year

Academy for Discovery @ Lakewood (3-8) 90 L1 84 L1 90 0.7%

Bay View 80 L2 87 L2 86 9.1%

Calcott 93 L1 91 L1 97 7.2%

Camp Allen 82 L2 82 L1 82 9.1%

Southside STEM Academy @Campostella (K-7) 53 L3 41 L3 29 2.8%

Chesterfield 58 L3 57 L3 39 13.1%

Coleman Pl 69 L2 61* L3 53 6.2%

Crossroads (Pk-8) 80 L1 79 L1 80 5.8%

Fairlawn ** 80 L2 73 L2 66* 8.1%

Ghent (K-8) 83 L1 88 L1 78 1.6%

Granby 79 L2 66* L3 76 8.9%

1010/3/2018

2018-2019 Accreditation Results: Elementary Schools

Note: New Rating structure (Level 1, Level 2, Level 3)English: Combines English: Reading (grades 3, 4, 5); Mathematics: Combines Math (Grades 3, 4, 5);Science: Grades 5‘*’ – Level based on a 3 Year Average‘**’ – Elementary Paired School (1st Year 2014-15)Percent passing based on Current Year

9-17-2018 EnglishEnglish

GapMath

Math Gap

ScienceChronic

Absenteeism

School / Data Year

Ingleside 78 L2 73 L2 57* 8.0%

Jacox 48 L3 37 L3 27 20.3%

Larchmont 95 L1 93 L1 87 1.8%

Larrymore 89 L1 86 L2 86 12.0%

Lindenwood 66 L3 44 L3 39 23.3%

Little Creek 79 L2 71 L2 67* 18.6%

Monroe 41 L3 41 L3 25 30.4%

Norview 77 L1 78 L2 79 8.0%

Ocean View 81 L1 80 L2 65* 13.9%

Oceanair 79 L2 78 L2 75 13.7%

Poplar Halls ** 80 L2 73 L2 66* 10.8%

1110/3/2018

2018-2019 Accreditation Results: Elementary Schools

Note:New Rating structure (Level 1, Level 2, Level 3)

English: Combines English: Reading (grades 3, 4, 5); Mathematics: Combines Math (Grades 3, 4, 5);Science: Grades 5‘*’ – Level based on a 3 Year Average‘**’ – Elementary Paired School (1st Year 2014-15)Percent passing based on Current Year

9-17-2018 EnglishEnglish

GapMath

Math Gap

ScienceChronic

Absenteeism

School / Data Year

P.B. Young, Sr. ** 65 L3 62 L2 53 12.0%

Richard Bowling 65 L3 57 L3 50 12.4%

Sewells Point 86 L2 90 L1 96 10.5%

Sherwood Forest 72* L2 70 L2 66 11.7%

St. Helena 57 L3 54 L3 51 9.2%

Suburban Park 84 L1 79 L1 77 12.3%

Tanners Creek 84 L1 72 L2 64 13.9%

Tarrallton 89 L1 89 L1 89 7.2%

Taylor 86 L2 92 L1 84 3.1%

Tidewater Park ** 65 L3 62 L2 53 8.0%

Willard 79 L1 80 L1 66* 10.3%

10/3/2018 12

2018-2019 Accreditation Results: Elementary Schools

Note: New Rating structure (Level 1, Level 2, Level 3)English: Combines English: Reading (grades 3, 4, 5); Mathematics: Combines Math (Grades 3, 4, 5);Science: Grades 5‘*’ – Level based on a 3 Year Average‘**’ – Elementary Paired School (1st Year 2014-15)Percent passing based on Current Year

9-17-2018 EnglishEnglish

GapMath

Math Gap

ScienceChronic

Absenteeism

School / Data Year

Azalea 71 L3 72 L2 70 17.7%

Blair 73 L3 79 L2 77 23.5%

Lake Taylor 63 L3 66 L3 56 28.5%

Northside 78 L2 85 L1 81 19.4%

Norview 76 L2 85 L1 79 20.1%

Ruffner 53 L3 65* L3 42 29.5%

1310/3/2018

2018-2019 Accreditation Results: High Schools

9-17-2018 EnglishEnglish

GapMath

Math Gap

ScienceChronic Absent-eeism

Dropout Rate

Graduation &

Completion Index

School / Data 2017-18

B. T. Washington

82 L1 48 L3 70 33.8% 11.2%* 88%

Granby 90 L1 67* L2 74 20.1% 8.7%** 90%

Lake Taylor 89 L1 55** L2 70 33.2% 7.5%* 90%

Maury 92 L1 75 L2 80 25.5% 9%* 86%

Norview 87 L1 67* L2 74 22.3% 11.9% 87%

14

Note: English: Combines English: Reading (grade 11) and English: Writing (grade 11)Mathematics: Combines Algebra I, Geometry and Algebra IIHistory: Combines World History 1, World History II, VA & US History and World GeographyScience: Combines Earth Science, Biology and Chemistry

‘*’ = Level based on 3 year average‘**’ = Level based on reduction in failure rate (R10)

10/3/2018

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

10/3/2018 15

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)Federal Accountability Indicators

16

2018-19 (Based on 2017-18 Data)

Comprehensive Support and ImprovementESSA requires identification of at least the lowest 5% of Title I schools based on performance for all students, and all high schools with a federal four-year cohort graduation rate below 67%, for comprehensive support and improvement.

Targeted Support and ImprovementSchools identified for targeted support and improvement due to low-performing subgroups (reporting groups) may also be identified for comprehensive support if they fail to improve over

Source: VDOE Website - Transition to ESSAThe new Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA) eliminates many No Child Left Behind Act-era requirements and provides greater flexibility ... ESSA designates 2016-2017 as a transition year …… and 2017-2018 school year as the implementation year….. Schools are identified for support every three years beginning with 2018-19 school year (2017-18 assessment year).10/3/2018

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)Federal Accountability Indicators

17

Indicators2018-19

(Based on 2017-18 Data)

Academic Indicators Pass Rates – SOL Reading and Math, VAAP

Growth in Reading and Mathematics

High school graduation rate (FGI)

Progress in English Learners (ACCESS for ELLs)

Indicators of School Quality or Student Success

Chronic Absenteeism

School Accreditation Rating

Federal Accountability IndicatorsUnder ESSA, school are identified for support and improvement based on multiple performance indicators.

Source: VDOE10/3/2018

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)Federal Accountability Indicators

18

SchoolsSY2017-18 NCLB-AMO

SY2018-19 ESSA School Improvement

SY2018-19 ESSA School Improvement to be determined.

10/3/2018

19

SB Goal: Improved Student Achievement: Accreditation

School Board Work SessionDivision of Academic Affairs

Division of Accountability & Information October 3, 2018

10/3/2018