Upload
david-radovanovic
View
626
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Saugerties Police Consolidation - Town of Saugerties Study of Service Configuration Options for the Village and Town Police Department was prepared by Fairweather Consulting of New Paltz, New york. The purpose of which is to to develop recommendations for restructuring the Police Departments in the Village and Town in order to…1. Maintain or improve the quality of services, and2. Reduce the cost of public safety services
Citation preview
Saugerties Public Safety Saugerties Public Safety S i C fi tiS i C fi tiSaugerties Public Safety Saugerties Public Safety S i C fi tiS i C fi tiService Configuration:Service Configuration:
A St d f S i C fi ti O ti A St d f S i C fi ti O ti
Service Configuration:Service Configuration:
A St d f S i C fi ti O ti A St d f S i C fi ti O ti
Town of Saugerties
A Study of Service Configuration Options A Study of Service Configuration Options for the Village and Town Police for the Village and Town Police DepartmentsDepartments
A Study of Service Configuration Options A Study of Service Configuration Options for the Village and Town Police for the Village and Town Police DepartmentsDepartments
Police Department
Village of Saugerties Police Department
Presentation of Final ReportVillage Board Meeting
FFAAIIRRWWEEAATTHHEERR CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG
Prepared by
Village Board MeetingMonday, August 17th, 2009
This document was prepared with funds provided by the New York State Department of State under the Local Government Efficiency Incentive Grant Program.
AgendaAgendaAgendaAgendaAgendaAgendaAgendaAgenda
Overview of the Public Safety Reconfiguration Study
The Study ProcessThe Study Process
Results of the Fiscal Impact Analysis
Other Non-Fiscal Impacts
Implementation of the Recommended Scenario
Next Stepsp
Final Report 2August 17th, 2009
Introduction to the Public Safety Introduction to the Public Safety Introduction to the Public Safety Introduction to the Public Safety
Study Objective
Reconfiguration StudyReconfiguration StudyReconfiguration StudyReconfiguration Study
Study Objective Develop recommendations for restructuring the Police Departments in the Village and Town in order to…
1. Maintain or improve the quality of services, and1. Maintain or improve the quality of services, and
2. Reduce the cost of public safety services
Key GoalsKey GoalsNo tax increases for Village residents or Town residents outside of the VillageNo loss of service; service improvements wherever possibleA more efficient department structure and operations, including:
1. A single chief and chain of command
2. Reduced need for administrative personnel
3. Simplicity and standardization
Final Report 3August 17th, 2009
A Full Range of Reconfiguration Options A Full Range of Reconfiguration Options A Full Range of Reconfiguration Options A Full Range of Reconfiguration Options Was ConsideredWas ConsideredWas ConsideredWas Considered
Mutual Aid Contract Law Consolidated/
Mergedmal
:ow
Rew
ard
ForH
igh Risk, Functional
Agreements EnforcementMerged
Departments
Info
rmLo
w R
isk,
Lo
rmal:
High Rew
ard
Consolidation
d
Other options fell short of the envisioned goal for the study…
So, the committee focused on consolidation.
Final Report 4August 17th, 2009
The Study Process Helped Identify the The Study Process Helped Identify the The Study Process Helped Identify the The Study Process Helped Identify the Best Reconfiguration OptionsBest Reconfiguration OptionsBest Reconfiguration OptionsBest Reconfiguration Options
Task 5: Select Preferred Alternatives & Prepare
Final Report
Task 1: Identify Reconfiguration
Goals & Objectives
Task 6: Develop Implementation Plan
Task 2: Collect Department
Data
Task 3: Identify Legal/Contractual
Constraints
Task 4a: Identify Configuration Options
Task 4b: Evaluate Fiscal and Non-Fiscal Impacts of Configuration Options
Work Plan
The Committee and Fairweather Consulting identified and evaluated eight potential reconfiguration scenarios before settling on a preferred scenario.
Final Report 5August 17th, 2009
For Each Scenario, Fiscal and NonFor Each Scenario, Fiscal and Non--Fiscal Fiscal For Each Scenario, Fiscal and NonFor Each Scenario, Fiscal and Non--Fiscal Fiscal Impacts Were WeighedImpacts Were WeighedImpacts Were WeighedImpacts Were Weighed
Fiscal Impacts Non-fiscal Impacts
Increases/decreases to Impacts on existing/retained
Salary increases to achieve standardized compensation
Increases/decreases to
equipment and contractual costs
Impact on levels of service provided to each community
Disposition of assets
personnel (benefits, seniority, etc.)
O ti t f i l t ti
Increases/decreases to costs of benefits
Personnel reductions and elimination of vacant positions
P f i l d l t
Disposition of assets owned/used by each Dept.
Oversight and governance of new department
One-time costs of implementation
Increases/decreases to insurance costs
Grants and other new
Professional development opportunities within new department
Public perceptions about restructuring
Final Report 6August 17th, 2009
revenues
How Are Police Services Paid in How Are Police Services Paid in How Are Police Services Paid in How Are Police Services Paid in Saugerties?Saugerties?Saugerties?Saugerties?
Village General Budget Townwide General Budget (Fund A) Town Outside General Budget (Fund B)g g$2,000,000
Village Police
53%Other
Services
47%
g ( )$2,600,000
g ( )$2,000,000
Other Services
94% Town Police (Dispatch)
6%
$0.16M
Other Services
12%
$0.24MTown Police
88%
Village Town Town Tax
Police$1.1M
Services$0.9M
Services$2.4M
$ $ Police$1.7M
$2 0M $2 6MTotal Amt to be Raised by Taxes $2 6M $2 0MVillage
Tax BillTown
Tax Bill (Village)
Town Tax Bill
(Outside)
$2.0M$259M =$7.68 $2.6M
$1.58B=$1.63
Town
Raised by Taxes= Tax RateTotal Assessed
Value of Property
=$1.63 +$2.6M$1.58B
$2.0M$1.32B =$1.49
Village Resident
Town Outside Resident
Total Effective Tax Rate = $9 32 Total Effective Tax Rate = $3 12
Final Report 7August 17th, 2009
Total Effective Tax Rate = $9.32 Total Effective Tax Rate = $3.12
How Are Police Services Paid in How Are Police Services Paid in How Are Police Services Paid in How Are Police Services Paid in Saugerties?Saugerties?Saugerties?Saugerties?
Village General Budget Townwide General Budget (Fund A) Town Outside General Budget (Fund B)
Village Police
Other Services
53%47%
g g$2,000,000
g ( )$2,600,000
g ( )$2,000,000
Other Services
94% Town Police (Dispatch)
6%
$0.16M
Other Services
12%
$0.24MTown Police
88%
$2 6M $2 0MVillage Town Town Tax
PoliceServices$1.1M$0.9M
Services$2.4M
$ $ Police$1.7M
$2 0M $2 6MTotal Amt to be Raised by Taxes
If we adjust these…It affects these…
=$1.63 +$2.6M$1.58B
$2.0M$1.32B =$1.49
Village Tax Bill
Town Tax Bill (Village)
Town Tax Bill
(Outside)
$2.0M$259M =$7.68 $2.6M
$1.58B=$1.63
Town
Raised by Taxes= Tax RateTotal Assessed
Value of Property
Village Resident
Town Outside Resident
Total Effective Tax Rate = $9 32 Total Effective Tax Rate = $3 12
Which affects these…
Final Report 8August 17th, 2009
Total Effective Tax Rate = $9.32 Total Effective Tax Rate = $3.12
Leading Scenario: Merge Village Police Leading Scenario: Merge Village Police Leading Scenario: Merge Village Police Leading Scenario: Merge Village Police Department into Town Police DepartmentDepartment into Town Police DepartmentDepartment into Town Police DepartmentDepartment into Town Police Department
Level of Service:At least 4 officers on patrol throughout the Town and Village at all timesA minimum of 2 officers would be assigned to patrol the Village at all times, with additional coverage as neededadditional coverage as neededA foot patrol will be provided during peak periods, and Town police will continue to support Village events (Garlic Fest, HITS, Car Show, etc.)
Personnel:Personnel:18-member patrol force (13-14 FT officers, 4 sergeants, and 0-1 lieutenant)One chief of police2 detectives2 detectives1 School Resource Officer
Governance:Chief reports to the Town Supervisor and the Village Mayorp p g y
Final Report 9August 17th, 2009
Year 1 & 2 Year 1 & 2 –– Savings for Village No Impact Savings for Village No Impact Year 1 & 2 Year 1 & 2 –– Savings for Village No Impact Savings for Village No Impact To Town Outside TaxpayersTo Town Outside TaxpayersTo Town Outside TaxpayersTo Town Outside Taxpayers
Village General Budget Townwide General Budget (Fund A) Town Outside General Budget (Fund B)g g$1,100,000
Other Services
84%
g ( )$4,860,000
g ( )$63,000
Other Services
50%Other
Services
100%Police Services
16%
$0.18M Town Police
50%
Village Town Town Tax
Services$0.9M
Services$2.4M
Services$63,000
$1 1M $4 9M $4 9M $63KTotal Amt to be Raised by Taxes
$ Police$2.4M
Village Tax Bill
Town Tax Bill (Village)
Town Tax Bill
(Outside)
$1.1M$259M =$4.28 $4.9M
$1.58B=$3.07 =$3.07 +$4.9M$1.58B
$63K$1.32B
Town
Raised by Taxes= Tax RateTotal Assessed
Value of Property
=$0.05
Village Resident
Town Outside Resident
Total Effective Tax Rate = $7.35 Total Effective Tax Rate = $3.12
Final Report 10August 17th, 2009
UNCHANGED21% SAVINGS
Year 3 Year 3 –– Village Sees Greater Savings, Village Sees Greater Savings, Town Outside Remains Unchanged if CostTown Outside Remains Unchanged if Cost--Year 3 Year 3 –– Village Sees Greater Savings, Village Sees Greater Savings, Town Outside Remains Unchanged if CostTown Outside Remains Unchanged if Cost--Town Outside Remains Unchanged if CostTown Outside Remains Unchanged if Cost--Saving Measures Are ImplementedSaving Measures Are ImplementedTown Outside Remains Unchanged if CostTown Outside Remains Unchanged if Cost--Saving Measures Are ImplementedSaving Measures Are Implemented
Village General Budget Townwide General Budget (Fund A) Town Outside General Budget (Fund B)g g$930,000
Other Services
100%
g ( )$4,640,000
g ( )$240,000
Other Services
52%Other
Services
100%Town Police
48%Combination of cost-saving measures & new revenues
Village Town Town Tax
Services$0.93M
Services$2.4M
Services$240,000
$0 9M $4 6MTotal Amt to be Raised by Taxes
Police$2.2M
reduce police expense by $214,000 or 8.8%
$4 6M $240KVillage Tax Bill
Town Tax Bill (Village)
Town Tax Bill
(Outside)
$0.9M$259M =$3.59 $4.6M
$1.58B=$2.94
Town
Raised by Taxes= Tax RateTotal Assessed
Value of Property
=$2.94 +$4.6M$1.58B
$240K$1.32B =$0.18
Village Resident
Town Outside Resident
Total Effective Tax Rate = $6.53 Total Effective Tax Rate = $3.12
Final Report 11August 17th, 2009
UNCHANGED30% SAVINGS
Year 3 Year 3 –– If CostIf Cost--Savings Are Not Realized, Savings Are Not Realized, Village Sees Less Savings & Town Outside Village Sees Less Savings & Town Outside Year 3 Year 3 –– If CostIf Cost--Savings Are Not Realized, Savings Are Not Realized, Village Sees Less Savings & Town Outside Village Sees Less Savings & Town Outside Village Sees Less Savings & Town Outside Village Sees Less Savings & Town Outside Sees Slight Tax IncreaseSees Slight Tax IncreaseVillage Sees Less Savings & Town Outside Village Sees Less Savings & Town Outside Sees Slight Tax IncreaseSees Slight Tax Increase
Village General Budget Townwide General Budget (Fund A) Town Outside General Budget (Fund B)g g$930,000
Other Services
100%
g ( )$4,860,000
g ( )$240,000
Other Services
50%Other
Services
100%Town Police
50%
Village Town Town Tax
Services$0.93M
Services$2.4M
Services$240,000
$0 9M $4 6MTotal Amt to be Raised by Taxes
Police$2.4M
$4 9M $240KVillage Tax Bill
Town Tax Bill (Village)
Town Tax Bill
(Outside)
$0.9M$259M =$3.59 $4.6M
$1.58B=$3.07
Town
Raised by Taxes= Tax RateTotal Assessed
Value of Property
=$3.07 +$4.9M$1.58B
$240K$1.32B =$0.18
Village Resident
Town Outside Resident
Total Effective Tax Rate = $6.66 Total Effective Tax Rate = $3.26
Final Report 12August 17th, 2009
4% INCREASE28% SAVINGS
Explanation of Changes to Town and Explanation of Changes to Town and Explanation of Changes to Town and Explanation of Changes to Town and Village Tax RatesVillage Tax RatesVillage Tax RatesVillage Tax Rates
Village Taxpayer Town Outside Taxpayer
8.00
10.00Village Taxpayer
$9.32 21% Savings
28% Savings
30% Savings 0.05 0.18 0.18
4.00Town Outside Taxpayer
$3 12 $3 12
No Change
$3.26
4% Increase
$3 12
No Change
7.68 4.28 3.59 3.594.00
6.00$7.35
$6.66 $6.53
3.07 3.07 2.94
1.49
2.00
$3.12 $3.12 $3.26 $3.12
1.633.07 3.07 2.94
0.00
2.00 1.63
0.00Before Merger
Years 1 & 2 Year 3 (Worst Case)
Year 3 (Best Case)
Fund A Rate Fund B RateVillage Rate
Before Merger
Years 1 & 2 Year 3 (Worst Case)
Year 3 (Best Case)
Fund A Rate Fund B RateVillage Rate
Final Report 13August 17th, 2009
A Variety of NonA Variety of Non--Fiscal Impacts Must Be Fiscal Impacts Must Be A Variety of NonA Variety of Non--Fiscal Impacts Must Be Fiscal Impacts Must Be Considered During ImplementationConsidered During ImplementationConsidered During ImplementationConsidered During Implementation
Positive Negative Mitigation
• All Village dept. staff would be brought over to the Town (except the Chief and either the
What will happen to staff not brought over to the
According to NYS Civil Service Law, any staff who involuntarily lose their job as a result of
Lieutenant or one FT officer).• Larger pool of police to draw from for
overtime and special events• Increased opportunities for advancement
Town?
How will seniority be
the merger will be added to a preferred list for future vacancies. For 4 years they will have the right to first refusal for any openings.
The two PBAs have agreed to meet to discuss within the force
• Village less reliant on State Police for investigations
• Ability to draw on best practices from each
How will seniority be determined, and what contractual benefits will be affected?
The two PBAs have agreed to meet to discuss issues related to the current Town contract. From a civil service perspective seniority will remain unchanged after the merger. The PBAs will determine the best method to h dl hift d ti biddi
y pdepartment to create the most effective police force
• Less confusion about jurisdiction for the public, dispatchers, and officers
How will time accrue toward retirement?
handle shift and vacation bidding.
PBAs will review this as part of the discussion about how the current Town contract must be modified to facilitate the merger
Final Report 14August 17th, 2009
• Village Police office freed up for other usesmodified to facilitate the merger.
Implementation of the Implementation of the Implementation of the Implementation of the
Step 1 – Village adopts resolution calling for a referendum on a law
Police Department MergerPolice Department MergerPolice Department MergerPolice Department Merger
p g p gabolishing the Village Police Department
Step 2 – Town and Village agree to terms of Police Merger
Step 3 – Village Board holds a public hearing to gather comments09/08 – SR. CITIZENS CENTERStep 4 – Village Board votes on the referendum
Step 5 – If approved by Board, residents vote on the referendum
/
09/21 – VILLAGE BOARD MEETINGStep 5 app o ed by oa d, es de ts ote o t e e e e du
Step 6 – Village and Town execute agreement, transfer function10/21 – REFERENDUM VOTE
12/31 – MERGER EXECUTED
Final Report 15August 17th, 2009
12/31 MERGER EXECUTED
Saugerties Public Safety Saugerties Public Safety S i C fi tiS i C fi tiSaugerties Public Safety Saugerties Public Safety S i C fi tiS i C fi tiService Configuration:Service Configuration:
A St d f S i C fi ti O ti A St d f S i C fi ti O ti
Service Configuration:Service Configuration:
A St d f S i C fi ti O ti A St d f S i C fi ti O ti
Town of Saugerties
A Study of Service Configuration Options A Study of Service Configuration Options for the Village and Town Police for the Village and Town Police DepartmentsDepartments
A Study of Service Configuration Options A Study of Service Configuration Options for the Village and Town Police for the Village and Town Police DepartmentsDepartments
Police Department
Village of Saugerties Police Department
Presentation of Final ReportVillage Board Meeting
FFAAIIRRWWEEAATTHHEERR CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG
Prepared by
Village Board MeetingMonday, August 17th, 2009
This document was prepared with funds provided by the New York State Department of State under the Local Government Efficiency Incentive Grant Program.