Upload
others
View
15
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AquacultureManagement and Development Plan
SAMOA
2013–2018
SAMOA
Aquaculture
Management and Development Plan
2013–2018
Secretariat of the Pacifi c Community Aquaculture Section
© Secretariat of the Pacifi c Community (SPC) 2012
All rights for commercial / for profi t reproduction or translation, in any form, reserved. SPC authorises the partial
reproduction or translation of this material for scientifi c, educational or research purposes, provided that SPC and the
source document are properly acknowledged. Permission to reproduce the document and/or translate in whole, in any
form, whether for commercial / for profi t or non-profi t purposes, must be requested in writing. Original SPC artwork
may not be altered or separately published without permission.
Original text: English
Secretariat of the Pacifi c Community Cataloguing-in-publication data
Samoa aquaculture management and development plan / Secretariat of the Pacifi c Community
Aquaculture Section
1. Aquaculture — management — Samoa.
2. Aquaculture – Economic aspects — Samoa.
3. Aquaculture – Law and legislation — Samoa.
I. Title. II. Secretariat of the Pacifi c Community.
639.8099614 AACR2
ISBN: 978-982-00-0598-3
Secretariat of the Pacifi c Community
BP D5, 98848 Noumea Cedex, New Caledonia
Tel: +687 26.20.00 Fax: +687 26.38.18
www.spc.int [email protected]
Prepared for publication at SPC headquarters, Noumea, New Caledonia, 2012
Printed at SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia, 2012
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–2018 i
CONTENTS
Foreword
1. Vision and goal for aquaculture in Samoa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
2. General introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
2.1. Current status of the aquaculture sector
2.2. Legal and policy framework
3. Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
4. Action plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
4.1. In English . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. In Samoan (Fuafuaga o Galuega Fa’atino) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. Species prioritisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
5.1. Priority commodities for aquaculture in Samoa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.2. High priority commodities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.3. Low priority commodities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Foreword
This Aquaculture Management and Development Plan sets out a clear guide for the future expansion of the
aquaculture sector in Samoa, and a comprehensive pathway for the Fisheries Division to ensure the long-term
sustainability of the activity. The involvement of fi sheries staff from various sections and broad, national, con-
sultation with many stakeholders will, I hope, foster a clear commitment toward the strategies, objectives and
actions of this fi ve-year management and development plan. The Fisheries Division, in partnership with com-
munities, farmers, and national and regional institutions, is now committed to promoting and developing the
aquaculture sector in a responsible and sustainable way, as an alternative to capture fi sheries, to help ensure
food and nutritional security and improve rural livelihoods. I am confi dent that this plan can drive the develop-
ment of aquaculture in Samoa and also assist the Ministry in achieving some of its Sector Plan long-term goals,
in particular in the fi sheries sector. I now present this Plan and commend it to the people of Samoa.
Soifua
Honourable Lemaea Ropati
Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–2018 1
1. Vision and goal for aquaculture in Samoa
1.1. Vision
Long-term benefi ts of socioeconomic growth for Samoa as a result of development of the aquaculture sector in
a sustainable and responsible way, as an income generating activity alternative to capture fi sheries.
1.2. Goal
The overall goal is to ensure food and nutritional security and improve rural and urban livelihoods through
sustainable and responsible development and management of the aquaculture sector in Samoa.
1.3. Main objective of Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan
The Plan’s main objective is to provide comprehensive guidance to the Fisheries Division and aquaculture
stakeholders on sustainable management and development of the aquaculture sector in the country by in-
creasing the number of species being farmed, identifying species with high commercial potential, providing
support to community development and management initiatives, enhancing the skills and knowledge of all
those involved in the sector, and researching and promoting ways to add value to existing products, in order to
improve the current status of the sector.
2. General introduction
2.1. Current status of the aquaculture sector
Samoa’s diverse aquatic fl ora and fauna resources are readily available from its surrounding coastal environ-
ment. Most form the basis of the country’s local subsistence, artisanal and commercial fi sheries. The inshore
fi shery resources, in particular, are vital as food and income for the rural fi shing communities. Although en-
terprise-led commercial aquaculture has not yet taken root in Samoa, aquaculture is widely recognised as a
viable means of increasing fi sheries production, as additional protein for the local population and as a means
of generating income.
The Strategy for Development of Samoa (SDS) recognises the potential role of aquaculture, and specifi es that
one of the activities is to ‘increase the harvestable stocks of fi sh and other marine resources’ by developing
‘fi sh farming to supplement natural stocks’. Aquaculture has already contributed to improvement of Samoa’s
resource status, through re-introduction and re-stocking of giant clam and trochus. These projects were initi-
ated by the South Pacifi c Aquaculture Development Project (SPADP) and the Fisheries Division, and continued
through an AusAID-funded Samoa Fisheries Project. The programme began with introductions of Tridacna sp.
and Hippopus hippopus from American Samoa and Fiji for grow-out in village lagoons in the Fisheries Extension
Programme. For freshwater aquaculture, the Fisheries Division is maintaining both chitrilada and genetically
improved farmed tilapia (GIFT) (Oreochromis niloticus) breeders at the public freshwater hatchery, and high
quality fi ngerlings are being supplied from this hatchery to many small-scale/land-based farmers. Tilapia cul-
ture in earthen ponds has been quite successful in Samoa for the past fi ve years, but the activity has also faced
major constraints and limitations as a result of lack of feeds, technology and skills, and limited access to mar-
kets. To conclude, real commercial aquaculture has yet to be developed in Samoa, despite previous attempts
to culture a range of species. High levels of inputs, specialised facilities and market development requirements
contribute to its slow progress. Nevertheless, aquaculture is still widely recognised as a viable means of increas-
ing fi sheries production, providing additional dietary resources, and generating income for local communities.
2.2. Legal and policy framework
• Fisheries Act.,1988.
One of the purposes of the Fisheries Act is ‘to promote the conservation, management and development
of the fisheries in Samoa’. The Act will guide and mandate fisheries, including aquaculture. It is worth not-
ing that a revised Fisheries Management Bill 2013, now with Cabinet, provides a more direct mandate for
the development of this Plan. Section 25 paragraph 2 states that the Fisheries Division may specify condi-
tions for the operation of aquaculture activities relating to conservation, management and sustainable use
of the aquatic environment.
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–20182
• Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Sector Plan 2012–2016.
One of the long-term objectives of the Sector Plan is to strengthen regulatory framework enforcement and
compliance capacities and public-private sector collaboration. The Fisheries Sector Plan specifi cally calls for the
development of an Aquaculture Management and Development Plan.
3. Strategies
Objective 1: To promote better aquaculture management practices
Rationale: Draft legislation on aquaculture, including regulations, permits and licensing, is required. Good
aquaculture practices at all levels of the production chain should be comprehensively developed and promot-
ed by the Fisheries Division. These practices should be made clear to all relevant key partners to ensure sound
management. Specifi c management and development plans for high priority commodities, e.g. tilapia, giant
clams, trochus and mullet, are also needed in order to provide clear guidance to all key stakeholders on the
streamlined development of the sector.
Objective 2: To improve marketability of aquaculture products in Samoa
Rationale: There is a real need to assess and better understand local and overseas markets and their potential
for aquaculture products in Samoa. Trade routes, freight charges and space, demand and supply, and access
requirements all need to be considered. Market access requirements must be complied with when export-
ing Samoan products overseas. Research on further value-adding products through post-harvest techniques,
processing and labelling of commodities, such as tilapia, should be encouraged. Once a market is established,
measures need to be in place to ensure that the supply chain is maintained. Research on the marketing of new
and existing products, and collaboration with the Ministry of Foreign Aff airs and Trade in seeking markets for
Samoa’s products should be encouraged.
Objective 3: To diversify the number of aquatic species that can be cultured in Samoa
Rationale: So far, there is only one freshwater public hatchery operational in Samoa to promote and develop
aquaculture for commercial and restocking purposes. In order to make possible a broader range of aquaculture
commodities that can be successfully produced in Samoa, this facility needs to be upgraded and a new marine
hatchery should be developed. Because the Toloa marine hatchery was closed, a proposal to re-establish the
facility should be submitted, identifying fi nancial support. Furthermore, production of microalgae is needed in
order to feed most high priority commodities such as giant clam, trochus and other potential species. Research
on potential local species of interest for capture-based aquaculture should be conducted.
Objective 4: To improve quality and availability of lower-cost feeds for aquaculture
Rationale: There is an urgent need to establish a proper feed storage unit and develop aff ordable (cost-effi cient)
aqua-feeds with available local raw materials for species such as tilapia. The cost of local production versus
imported products may cause problems. Small-scale feed processors would be ideal for small countries such as
Samoa to meet the required level of production. Training for Fisheries Division staff and private sector person-
nel in feed formulation for hatchery and grow-out is essential. As follow-on research from the feed ingredients
survey and analyses already conducted in Samoa, implementing on-farm trials should be promoted by the
Fisheries Division, to test and compare the performance of fi sh feed made from various local ingredients in a
real production system and identify the best.
Objective 5: To ensure access by farmers to the best possible genetic quality of seed stocks
Rationale: Proper broodstock management protocols and coherent selective breeding strategies for high prior-
ity species should be encouraged by the Fisheries Division. GIFT breeders and good quality giant clams brood-
stock should be maintained and be available to the private sector and other key stakeholders when required.
3
Objective 6: To promote private sector development
Rationale: ‘Pilot’ semi-commercial farms should be developed in order to demonstrate the feasibility of aqua-
culture activities in Samoa. These pilot farms should be established in partnership with the private sector to
promote best management practices and foster the industry. Practical training opportunities for all key part-
ners engaged in producing high priority commodities should be developed and promoted. Incentives for the
private sector should be encouraged to ensure confi dence in investing. Pilot farms will serve to assess the
viability of the culture of a selected species in partnership with the private sector. Agreements between the
investor and community should be arranged to ensure loyalty and consistency in supply. Funding schemes for
potential fi sh farmers to help them establish farms should be assessed (e.g. micro-credit schemes). A proposal
to the Government for duty free or reduced import tax for imported inputs (e.g. equipment, seed, feeds) for a
period to kick-start industry development should be evaluated.
Objective 7: To improve human resource capacities to manage and develop aquaculture
Rationale: The current structure of the Fisheries Division for aquaculture should be reviewed and expanded,
and include establishing a Principal Fisheries Offi cer for Aquaculture post. General technical expertise on aqua-
culture is limited in Samoa, even within the Aquaculture Section of the Fisheries Division. A training needs
analysis (TNA) is required, in order to identify skills and knowledge gaps and prioritise training needs for further
development. Short- and long-term training programmes should be promoted. Funding to implement such
programmes must be secured from either Government or specifi c donors.
Objective 8: To improve aquaculture networking
Rationale: Local, regional and international networking should be promoted and maintained, in the provision
of research, training and technical advice.
44
. Act
ion
pla
n
4.1
. In
En
gli
sh
Strategic objectives
Act
ion
sP
erf
orm
an
ce in
dic
ato
rsT
ime
fra
me
Pro
ject
s
1.
To p
rom
ote
be
tte
r a
qu
acu
ltu
re m
an
ag
em
en
t p
ract
ice
s (B
MP
s)
1.1
. S
pe
cify
te
rms
and
co
nd
itio
ns
for
com
me
rcia
l aq
uac
ult
ure
far
ms.
1.1
. Te
rms
and
co
nd
itio
ns
de
velo
pe
d.
Mid
20
13
1.
Pre
par
e t
erm
s a
nd
co
nd
itio
ns
for
com
me
rcia
l a
qu
acu
ltu
re f
arm
s.
2.
Pre
pa
re t
erm
s a
nd
co
nd
itio
ns
for
ha
tch
ery
e
sta
blis
hm
en
t a
nd
op
era
tio
n.
3.
Pre
pa
re im
po
rt r
isk
an
aly
sis
for
an
y p
rop
osa
ls
to in
tro
du
ce a
qu
ati
c sp
eci
es,
as
req
uir
ed
(IR
A
gu
ide
line
s).
4.
De
velo
p c
om
mo
dit
y p
lan
s fo
r th
e t
op
pri
ori
ty
aq
ua
tic
spe
cie
s.
1.2
. S
pe
cify
te
rms
and
co
nd
itio
ns
for
hat
che
ry
est
ablis
hm
en
t an
d o
pe
rati
on
.1
.2.
Term
s an
d c
on
dit
ion
s d
eve
lop
ed
.2
01
3
1.3
. P
rep
are
imp
ort
ris
k an
alys
is fo
r an
y p
rop
osa
ls
to in
tro
du
ce a
qu
atic
sp
eci
es.
1.3
. R
isk
anal
ysis
pre
par
ed
as
req
uir
ed
.O
ng
oin
g
1.4
. D
eve
lop
co
mm
od
ity
pla
ns
for
the
to
p p
rio
rity
aq
uat
ic s
pe
cie
s.1
.4.
Co
mm
od
ity
pla
ns
de
velo
pe
d fo
r fo
ur
spe
cie
s.2
01
5
1.5
. C
on
du
ct a
pe
rio
dic
al r
evi
ew
of
the
Aq
uac
ul-
ture
Man
age
me
nt
and
De
velo
pm
en
t P
lan
.1
.5.
Co
nsu
ltat
ion
he
ld a
nd
Aq
uac
ult
ure
Man
-
age
me
nt
and
De
velo
pm
en
t P
lan
re
vie
we
d.
Pro
gre
ss r
evi
ew
– a
fte
r tw
o y
ear
s
Pla
n r
evi
ew
– a
fte
r fi
ve y
ear
s
2.
To im
pro
ve
ma
rke
tab
ilit
y o
f a
qu
acu
ltu
re p
rod
uct
s in
Sa
mo
a
2.1
. A
sse
ss m
arke
t re
qu
ire
me
nt
for
loca
l an
d
exp
ort
mar
kets
.2
.1.
Mar
ket
req
uir
em
en
ts fo
r lo
cal a
nd
exp
ort
mar
kets
ide
nti
fi e
d.
Tila
pia
– e
nd
20
13
Se
a g
rap
e –
en
d 2
01
4
1.
Ass
ess
ma
rke
t re
qu
ire
me
nts
fo
r lo
cal a
nd
e
xpo
rt m
ark
ets
.
2.
Ass
ist
pro
du
cers
to
co
mp
ly w
ith
ma
rke
t re
qu
ire
me
nts
as
req
uir
ed
.
3.
Ass
ist
in p
rod
uct
de
velo
pm
en
t su
ch a
s v
alu
e
ad
din
g a
nd
pro
cess
ing
.
2.2
. A
ssis
t p
rod
uce
rs t
o c
om
ply
wit
h m
arke
t re
qu
ire
me
nts
as
req
uir
ed
.2
.2.
Re
leva
nt
mar
ket
req
uir
em
en
ts m
et
by
pro
du
cers
.
On
go
ing
2.3
. A
ssis
t in
pro
du
ct d
eve
lop
me
nt
such
as
valu
e
add
ing
an
d p
roce
ssin
g.
2.3
. A
ssis
tan
ce p
rovi
de
d fo
r p
rod
uct
de
velo
p-
me
nt.
On
go
ing
3.
To d
ive
rsif
y t
he
nu
mb
er
of
aq
ua
tic
spe
cie
s th
at
can
be
cu
ltu
red
in S
am
oa
3.1
. E
stab
lish
a m
ult
i-sp
eci
es
hat
che
ry.
3.1
. H
atch
ery
est
ablis
he
d.
20
13
1.
Est
ab
lish
a m
ult
i-sp
eci
es
ha
tch
ery
.
2.
Est
ab
lish
a m
icro
-alg
al l
ab
ora
tory
.
3.
Ass
ess
po
ten
tia
l fo
r ca
ptu
red
-ba
sed
a
qu
acu
ltu
re.
3.2
. E
stab
lish
a m
icro
-alg
al la
bo
rato
ry.
3.2
. A
lgal
lab
ora
tory
est
ablis
he
d.
20
13
3.3
. In
itia
te s
ee
d p
rod
uct
ion
for
aqu
acu
ltu
re a
nd
co
asta
l fi s
he
rie
s re
sto
ckin
g.
3.3
. S
ee
d p
rod
uct
ion
init
iate
d.
On
go
ing
fro
m 2
01
3
3.4
. A
sse
ss p
ote
nti
al fo
r ca
ptu
re-b
ase
d
aqu
acu
ltu
re.
3.4
. P
ote
nti
al a
sse
sse
d.
Fre
shw
ate
r p
raw
n –
mid
20
13
Oth
er
spe
cie
s –
en
d 2
01
4
4.
To im
pro
ve
qu
ali
ty a
nd
av
ail
ab
ilit
y o
f lo
we
r-co
st f
ee
ds
for
aq
ua
cult
ure
4.1
. E
stab
lish
a p
rop
er
fee
d s
tora
ge
un
it.
4.1
. S
tora
ge
un
it e
stab
lish
ed
.E
nd
20
13
1.
Est
ab
lish
a p
rop
er
fee
d s
tora
ge
un
it.
2.
Pro
du
ctio
n o
f a
qu
a-f
ee
ds
wit
h a
vaila
ble
raw
m
ate
ria
ls (
be
st f
ee
d id
en
tifi
ed
).
3.
Co
nd
uct
on
-fa
rm t
ria
ls o
f fe
ed
fo
rmu
late
d
fro
m r
esu
lts
of
the
fe
ed
ing
red
ien
t in
ven
tory
su
rve
y.
4.2
. E
xpe
rim
en
tal p
rod
uct
ion
of
aqu
a fe
ed
s w
ith
av
aila
ble
raw
mat
eri
als
(be
st fe
ed
ide
nti
fi e
d).
4.2
. Fe
ed
pro
du
ced
(be
st fe
ed
ide
nti
fi e
d).
On
go
ing
fro
m 2
01
3
4.3
. C
on
du
ct o
n-f
arm
tri
als
of f
ee
d fo
rmu
late
d fr
om
re
sult
s o
f th
e fe
ed
ing
red
ien
t in
ven
tory
su
rve
y.4
.3.
On
-far
m t
rial
s co
nd
uct
ed
.B
y 2
01
4
Sam
oa A
quac
ultu
re M
anag
emen
t and
Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n 20
13–2
018
Strategic objectives
5.
To e
nsu
re a
cce
ss b
y f
arm
ers
to
th
e b
est
po
ssib
le g
en
eti
c q
ua
lity
of
see
d s
tock
s
5.1
. M
ain
tain
th
e b
roo
d-s
tock
in c
ult
ure
.5
.1.
Bro
od
-sto
ck m
ain
tain
ed
in c
ult
ure
.O
ng
oin
g fo
r ti
lap
ia a
nd
gia
nt
clam
1.
Ma
inta
in t
he
bro
od
-sto
ck in
cu
ltu
re.
2.
Pre
pa
re a
nd
imp
lem
en
t th
e b
roo
d-s
tock
m
an
ag
em
en
t p
roto
col t
o m
ain
tain
ge
ne
tic
qu
alit
y.
3.
Ma
ke a
vaila
ble
qu
alit
y b
ree
de
rs f
or
aq
ua
cul-
ture
by
sta
keh
old
ers
.
5.2
. P
rep
are
an
d im
ple
me
nt
the
bro
od
-sto
ck
man
age
me
nt
pro
toco
l to
mai
nta
in g
en
eti
c q
ual
ity.
5.2
. B
roo
d-s
tock
pe
rfo
rman
ce m
ain
tain
ed
On
go
ing
for
tila
pia
fro
m 2
01
3
5.3
. M
ake
ava
ilab
le h
igh
qu
alit
y b
ree
de
rs fo
r
aqu
acu
ltu
re b
y st
ake
ho
lde
rs.
5.3
. H
igh
qu
alit
y b
ree
de
rs a
vaila
ble
as
req
uir
ed
.
Tila
pia
– O
ng
oin
g f
rom
no
w
Gia
nt
clam
– O
ng
oin
g f
rom
hat
che
ry e
stab
lish
ed
6.
To p
rom
ote
pri
va
te s
ect
or
de
ve
lop
me
nt
6.1
. E
stab
lish
pilo
t fa
rms.
6.1
. P
ilot
farm
s e
stab
lish
ed
Mid
20
13
1.
Est
ab
lish
pilo
t fa
rms.
2.
Pro
mo
te h
an
ds-
on
tra
inin
g o
pp
ort
un
itie
s fo
r to
p p
rio
rity
co
mm
od
itie
s.
3.
Re
vie
w p
ote
nti
al i
nce
nti
ves
to e
nco
ura
ge
in
vest
me
nt
in a
qu
acu
ltu
re.
6.2
. P
rom
ote
han
ds-
on
tra
inin
g o
pp
ort
un
itie
s fo
r
top
pri
ori
ty c
om
mo
dit
ies.
6.2
. H
and
s-o
n t
rain
ing
pro
mo
ted
.M
id 2
01
3
6.3
. R
evi
ew
po
ten
tial
ince
nti
ves
to e
nco
ura
ge
inve
stm
en
t in
aq
uac
ult
ure
.
6.3
. In
cen
tive
str
ate
gie
s id
en
tifi
ed
as
re-
qu
ire
d.
On
go
ing
7.
To im
pro
ve
hu
ma
n r
eso
urc
e c
ap
aci
tie
s to
ma
na
ge
an
d d
ev
elo
p a
qu
acu
ltu
re
7.1
. C
on
du
ct t
rain
ing
ne
ed
s an
alys
is fo
r aq
uac
ul-
ture
sta
ff .
7.1
. Tr
ain
ing
ne
ed
s id
en
tifi
ed
.2
01
31
. C
on
du
ct t
rain
ing
ne
ed
s a
na
lysi
s fo
r a
qu
acu
l-tu
re s
taff
.
2.
Co
nd
uct
tra
inin
g f
or
aq
ua
cult
ure
sta
ff b
ase
d
on
th
e n
ee
ds
an
aly
sis.
3.
Su
bm
it p
rop
osa
l fo
r P
rin
cip
al F
ish
eri
es
Offi
ce
r re
cru
itm
en
t.
4.
Faci
lita
te t
rain
ing
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
for
pri
va
te
sect
or,
ba
sed
on
de
ma
nd
.
7.2
. C
on
du
ct t
rain
ing
for
aqu
acu
ltu
re s
taff
bas
ed
on
th
e n
ee
ds
anal
ysis
.
7.2
. Tr
ain
ing
co
nd
uct
ed
.O
ng
oin
g
7.3
. S
ub
mit
pro
po
sal f
or
Pri
nci
pal
Fis
he
rie
s O
ffi c
er
Aq
uac
ult
ure
re
cru
itm
en
t.
7.3
. P
rin
cip
al F
ish
eri
es
Offi
ce
r A
qu
acu
ltu
re
recr
uit
ed
.
On
go
ing
7.4
. Fa
cilit
ate
tra
inin
g o
pp
ort
un
itie
s fo
r p
riva
te
sect
or,
bas
ed
on
de
man
d.
7.4
. Tr
ain
ing
for
pri
vate
se
cto
r p
rom
ote
d a
nd
con
du
cte
d.
On
go
ing
8.
To im
pro
ve
aq
ua
cult
ure
ne
two
rkin
g
8.1
. Fa
cilit
ate
nat
ion
al le
vel n
etw
ork
s su
ch a
s S
a-
mo
a A
qu
acu
ltu
re F
arm
ers
Ass
oci
atio
n (S
AFA
).
8.1
F
arm
ers
str
en
gth
en
ed
th
rou
gh
exc
han
ge
and
co
llab
ora
tio
n.
On
go
ing
1.
Faci
lita
te n
ati
on
al-
lev
el n
etw
ork
s su
ch a
s S
am
oa
Aq
ua
cult
ure
Fa
rme
rs A
sso
cia
tio
n (
SA
FA).
2.
Ma
inta
in r
eg
ion
al a
nd
inte
rna
tio
na
l ne
two
rks
to p
rov
ide
re
sea
rch
, tra
inin
g a
nd
te
chn
ica
l a
dv
ice
, fo
r e
xam
ple
wit
h S
PC
, US
P, S
PR
EP,
FA
O
an
d A
CIA
R.
8.2
. M
ain
tain
re
gio
nal
an
d in
tern
atio
nal
ne
two
rks
to p
rovi
de
re
sear
ch, t
rain
ing
an
d t
ech
nic
al a
dvi
ce,
wit
h, e
.g. t
he
Se
cre
tari
at o
f th
e P
acifi
c C
om
mu
nit
y
(SP
C),
th
e U
niv
ers
ity
of
the
So
uth
Pac
ifi c
(U
SP
), t
he
Se
cre
tari
at o
f th
e P
acifi
c R
eg
ion
al E
nvi
ron
me
nt
Pro
gra
mm
e (
SP
RE
P),
th
e U
nit
ed
Nat
ion
s Fo
od
an
d
Ag
ricu
ltu
re O
rgan
izat
ion
(FA
O)
and
th
e A
ust
ralia
n
Ce
ntr
e f
or
Inte
rnat
ion
al A
gri
cult
ura
l Re
sear
ch
(AC
IAR
), a
mo
ng
oth
ers
.
8.2
. Tr
ain
ing
op
po
rtu
nit
ies
and
te
chn
ical
advi
ce a
vaila
ble
to
th
e M
inis
try
of
Ag
ricu
ltu
re
and
Fis
he
rie
s b
y va
rio
us
stak
eh
old
ers
.
On
go
ing
64
.2.
In S
am
oa
n (
Fua
fua
ga
o G
alu
eg
a F
a’a
tin
o)
Fua
fua
ga
Alu
alu
Ma
ma
oFa
’am
ao
nig
aG
alu
eg
a F
a’a
tin
oM
ata
’itu
ina
o G
alu
eg
a
Fa’a
tin
o
Taim
i Fa
atu
lag
ain
a m
o
Ga
lue
ga
Fa’
ati
no
Po
lok
eti
1.
la u
na
ia le
pu
lea
ta
tau
ina
o le
fa
afa
ato
ag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
E t
atau
on
a m
anin
o le
lei a
iaig
a o
le f
a’af
a’at
oag
ain
a o
i’a m
a fi
go
ta i
toto
nu
o le
Tu
lafo
no
Au
tu m
a Tu
lafo
no
Faat
on
uto
nu
a le
Vae
ga
o F
aig
afai
va. I
a fa
’ati
no
lele
i gal
-
ue
ga
o f
a’at
oag
a i’a
ma
fi g
ota
i al
a ta
tau
ma
le p
uip
uig
a
o le
si’o
si’o
mag
a e
am
ata
mai
i le
Vae
ga
o F
aig
afai
va
ma
fa’a
lau
iloa
i an
a p
aag
a fa
i fa’
ato
aga.
Ia m
anin
o fo
i le
ta’ia
la m
o le
pu
ipu
iga
lele
i o le
si’o
si’o
mag
a m
ai f
a’at
oag
a
i’a m
a fi
go
ta i
toto
nu
o t
usi
ta’
iala
mo
le a
tia’
e o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
ina
ia u
sita
ia e
fai
fa’a
toag
a u
ma.
1.1
. Fa
usi
a ta
’iala
mo
le f
a’at
ino
ina
o f
a’at
oag
a i’a
m
a fi
go
ta f
a’ap
isin
isi.
Aia
iga
mo
fa’
ato
aga
fa’a
pis
inis
i.O
gat
oto
nu
o le
20
13
1.
Tap
en
a ai
aig
a m
o le
tai
ala
o
fa’a
toag
a fa
’ap
isin
isi.
2.
Tap
en
a ai
aig
a m
o le
tai
ala
o f
ale
fa
’afo
foa
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta
3.
Tap
en
ape
na
mo
su
esu
eg
a o
a’
afi a
ga
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta e
on
o f
a’au
lu
mai
i to
ton
u o
Sam
oa
mo
fa’
ato
aga.
4.
Fau
sia
ta’ia
la m
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta u
a fi
lifi l
ia m
o le
ati
na’
ein
a.
1.2
. Fa
usi
a ta
’iala
mo
le f
a’at
ino
ina
o f
ale
fa
’afo
foa
i’a m
a fi
go
ta.
Aia
iga
mo
fal
e f
a’af
ofo
a i’a
ma
fi g
ota
.2
01
3
1.3
. Fa
’ati
no
su
esu
eg
a m
o a
’afi
aga
o le
si
’osi
’om
aga
i i’a
ma
fi g
ota
e f
a’au
lufa
le m
ai i
toto
nu
o S
amo
a m
o le
fa’
afaa
toag
ain
a.
Mau
tu s
ue
sue
ga
o a
’afi
aga
o
le s
i’osi
’om
aga
i i’a
ma
fi g
ota
e
fa’a
ulu
mai
i to
ton
u o
Sam
oa.
Fa’a
auau
1.4
. Fa
usi
a le
tu
si t
a’ia
la m
o le
ati
na’
e o
me
aola
m
o le
fa’
afa’
ato
agai
na.
Tusi
ta’
iala
mo
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
fi
lifi l
ia.
20
15
1.5
. Fa
’ati
no
ina
le il
oilo
ina
o le
Tu
si T
aial
a m
o
le P
ule
ain
a ta
tau
ma
le A
tin
a’e
ina
o F
a’a-
fa’a
toag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
.
Iloilo
ga
o le
Tu
si T
aial
a.R
ipo
ti o
le il
oilo
ga-
pe
a m
aea
le 2
ta
usa
ga.
To
e il
oilo
ina
len
ei F
uaf
uag
a fa
’ata
’ati
a p
e a
mae
a le
5 t
ausa
ga.
2.
la f
a’a
lele
ia f
efa
’ata
ua
iga
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta f
a’a
faa
toa
ga
ina
i S
am
oa
ma
atu
nu
u i
fafo
E m
oo
mia
le s
ue
sue
ina
o m
ake
ti i
Sam
oa
ma
atu
nu
u i
fafo
ina
ia m
alam
alam
a i t
aim
i o f
em
alag
aig
a o
vaa
lele
ma
va’a
i le
sam
i, ta
u o
uta
ma
avan
oa
o u
ta fe
ave
a’i i
vaa
l-
ele
ma
vaa,
man
aog
a o
loo
iai m
o o
loa
fa’a
fa’a
toag
a m
a
aiai
ga
o m
ake
ti i
atu
nu
u i
fafo
. A f
a’am
autu
mai
se
mak
eti
mai
faf
o m
o i’
a, e
tat
au fo
’i o
na
iloilo
fa’
ato
aga
i Sam
oa
po
’o la
va le
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
mau
a au
a lo
na
fa’a
tau
ina
atu
.
2.1
. Fa
’ati
no
su
esu
eg
a m
o m
ake
ti i
Sam
oa
ma
atu
nu
’u i
fafo
.Ta
’iala
mo
mak
eti
i S
amo
a m
a fa
fo m
o le
au
fai
fa’a
toag
a.T
ilap
ia –
fa’
aiu
ga
20
13
Lim
u f
uaf
ua
– f
a’ai
ug
a 2
01
41
. S
ue
sue
aia
iga
o m
ake
ti m
o le
fe
fa’a
tau
aig
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
.
2.
Fa’a
mal
osi
a le
gal
ulu
e a
fai
faat
o-
aga
ia a
usi
a ai
aig
a a
mak
eti
.
3.
Au
iliili
le t
alaf
eau
ga
o o
loa
gao
sia
mai
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
mo
fe
fa’a
tau
aig
a.
2.2
. Fe
soas
oan
i i le
au
fai
fa’a
toag
a i l
e a
usi
ain
a o
ai
aig
a o
mak
eti
i fa
fo.
Ta’ia
la ia
maf
ai o
na
ausi
a e
le a
u
faif
aato
aga.
Fa’a
auau
2.3
. Fe
soas
oan
i i le
ati
na’
ein
a o
olo
a g
aosi
a m
ai
i’a m
a fi
go
ta.
Feso
aso
ani m
o le
ati
na’
e o
olo
a fa
osi
a m
ai i’
a m
a fi
go
ta.
Fa’a
auau
3.
la f
aa
tele
ina
le a
ofa
iga
ma
itu
aig
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
mo
le f
a’a
-fa’
ato
ag
ain
a
Talu
ai o
na
ole
leai
o s
e f
ale
e f
a’af
ofo
a ai
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
o le
sam
i i S
amo
a, u
a al
agat
atau
ai o
na
fau
sia
se f
ale
mo
len
ei
fa’a
mo
em
oe.
Ua
tata
u fo
’i o
na
toe
fa’
ale
leia
no
foag
a o
lo’o
fa’
afo
foa
ai m
eao
la v
ai o
lo’o
iai n
ei.
Ua
man
a’o
mia
fo’i
le f
ausi
a o
se
fal
e m
o le
fa’
aola
ina
ma
tau
sia
ai le
lim
u
aua
me
aai a
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
o le
a f
a’af
ofo
ain
a. Ia
fa’
atin
oin
a
saili
ilig
a m
o m
eao
la e
tal
afe
agai
e t
apu
’e m
ai i
o la
tou
si’o
si’o
mag
a m
o le
fa’
afa’
ato
agai
na.
3.1
. Fa
usi
ain
a o
le f
ale
fa’
afo
foa
mo
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
m
ai le
sam
i ma
vaim
agal
o.
Fa’a
tuin
a le
fal
e f
a’af
ofo
a i’a
ma
fi g
ota
.2
01
31
. Fa
usi
a fa
le f
a’af
ofo
a m
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta m
a le
fal
e f
a’af
ofo
a m
o le
lim
u.
2.
Fa’a
tin
o g
alu
eg
a fa
’afo
foa
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta.
3.
Su
esu
eg
a m
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta t
alaf
ea-
gai
ia f
a’at
ino
ina.
3.2
. Fa
usi
ain
a o
le f
ale
e f
a’ao
la m
a ta
usi
a ai
lim
u
mo
le f
afag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
fa’
afo
foa.
Fa’a
tuin
a le
fal
e e
fa’
afo
foa
ma
tau
sia
ai li
mu
.2
01
3
3.3
. Fa
’ati
no
ina
le f
a’af
ofo
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
mo
le
to
e f
a’at
ele
ina
o n
ei m
eao
la i
gat
aifa
le.
Fa’a
tin
o g
alu
eg
a fa
’afo
foa
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta.
Fa’a
auau
mai
le 2
01
3
3.4
. Fa
’ati
no
su
esu
eg
a i l
e t
alaf
eag
ai o
le
fa’a
fa’a
toag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
mai
i’a
tap
u’e
.S
ue
sue
ga
mo
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
ta
lafe
agai
ia f
a’at
ino
ina.
Ula
vai –
20
13
Isi m
eao
la –
fa’
aiu
ga
20
14
4.
la f
aa
lele
ia le
ga
osi
ain
a o
me
aa
i mo
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
fa
’a-f
a’a
toa
ga
ina
O le
tas
i o v
aeg
a ta
ua
tele
mo
le f
a’af
a’at
oag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
, o m
eaa
i au
a le
faf
agai
na
i fa’
ato
aga.
O f
a’at
oag
a
ne
i e a
ofi
a ai
tila
pia
, ula
vai m
a is
i. O
me
aai l
ele
i mo
me
aola
o s
e t
asi o
vae
ga
o lo
o m
o’o
mia
te
le le
fa’
ale
leia
e le
Vae
ga
o F
aig
afai
va. O
lea
e m
o’o
mia
ai l
e le
lei m
a
mau
tu o
se
fal
e, m
asin
i ma
me
afai
gal
ue
ga
mo
le g
aosi
a
ma
le t
eu
ina
mal
u o
me
aai.
4.1
. Fa
usi
ain
a o
le f
ale
e t
eu
ina
ai m
eaa
i mo
i’a.
Fau
sia
le f
ale
mo
le t
eu
mal
uin
a o
me
aai a
i’a.
Fa’a
iug
a o
le 2
01
31
. Fa
usi
a se
no
foag
a e
te
u m
alu
ai
me
aai a
i’a.
2.
Su
esu
eg
a o
le o
la o
i’a
mai
me
aai
gao
si i
toto
nu
o S
amo
a.
3.
Fa’a
tin
o f
a’at
a’it
a’ig
a o
me
aai g
ao-
sia
mo
fa’
ato
aga.
4.2
. Fa
’ata
’ita’
i le
gao
sia
o m
eaa
i a i’
a m
ai i
me
a o
lo
’o m
aua
io t
ato
u la
ufa
nu
a.G
aosi
a m
eaa
i a i’
a.Fa
’aau
au i
le 2
01
3
4.3
. Fa
’ati
no
se
fa’
ata’
ita’
iga
e s
ue
sue
ai l
e o
la o
i’a
mai
i m
eaa
i o lo
’o g
aosi
a i m
ea
o lo
’o m
aua
io
tato
u la
ufa
nu
a.
Fa’a
tin
o F
a’at
a’it
a’ig
a m
o
fa’a
toag
a.
I le
20
14
Sam
oa A
quac
ultu
re M
anag
emen
t and
Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n 20
13–2
018
5.
la f
a’a
tum
au
ina
le t
ula
ga
lele
i o le
i’a
mo
fa
ifa
’ato
ag
a
O le
lele
i o le
itu
aig
a i’a
(ge
ne
tic)
o s
e t
asi o
vae
ga
tau
a e
ao o
na
fa’a
tum
auin
a. O
le V
aeg
a o
Fai
gaf
aiva
o lo
’o ia
i le
tila
pia
lele
i (b
est
ge
ne
tic)
o lo
’o t
eu
ina
ai m
a fa
’aso
loso
lo
le f
a’af
ofo
ain
a au
a le
i’a
lele
i lo
na
itu
aig
a m
o f
aifa
’ato
aga.
5.1
. La
fa’
atu
mau
ina
le le
lei o
me
aola
e
fa’a
aog
ain
a i f
a’af
ofo
aga.
Ia m
alu
pu
ipu
ia m
eao
la e
fa
aao
gai
na
i faa
fofo
aga.
Fa’a
auau
mo
tila
pia
ma
fais
ua
1.
Mal
u p
uip
uia
me
aola
e f
aaao
gai
na
i f
a’af
ofo
aga.
2.
La f
a’at
ino
ina
ta’ia
la m
anin
o m
o le
va
aia
lele
i o n
ei m
eao
la.
3.
La f
a’at
um
auin
a le
mau
a o
me
aola
le
lei m
a ta
lafe
agai
mo
fa’
afo
foag
a p
e a
m
ana’
om
ia e
fai
fa’a
toag
a.
5.2
. La
fa’
atin
oin
a ta
’iala
man
ino
ma
lele
i mo
le
vaai
a o
ne
i me
aola
.Fa
’atu
mau
ina
lele
i tal
afe
agai
o
ne
i me
aola
mo
gal
ue
ga
fa
’afo
foa.
Fa’a
auau
mo
tila
pia
mai
le 2
01
3
5.3
. L
a fa
’atu
mau
ina
le m
aua
o m
ea
ola
lele
i mo
fa
’afo
foa
ga
pe
a m
ana
om
ia e
fai
fa’a
toa
ga
.M
auti
no
a le
iai o
me
aola
lele
i m
o f
a’af
ofo
aga
pe
a m
ana’
om
ia.
Fa’a
auau
mo
tila
pia
– F
a’aa
uau
mo
fa
isu
a p
e a
mae
a fa
usi
a le
fale
faaf
ofo
a
6.
la f
a’a
ma
losi
a le
au
faif
a’a
toa
ga
ma
pis
isi t
um
ao
ti e
fa’
a-f
a’a
toa
ga
ina
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
Ia a
tia’
e n
i fa’
ato
aga
fa’a
luai
loa
e f
a’ai
lo a
i e m
afai
on
a
fa’a
tin
o le
fa’
afa’
ato
agai
na
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta i
Sam
oa.
.
O le
tas
i le
ne
i o v
aeg
a e
tat
au o
na
aga’
i iai
le V
aeg
a o
Faig
afai
va in
a ia
fa’
atu
ina
itu
aig
a o
fa’
ato
aga
fa’a
pe
ne
i,
e f
a’at
ino
ai a
’oao
ga
a le
au
faif
a’at
oag
a, a
og
a m
a is
i e fi
a
mal
amal
ama
i le
fa’
atin
og
a o
len
ei a
tin
a’e.
6.1
. Fa
usi
a fa
’ato
aga
fa’a
lau
iloa
mo
le t
ilap
ia.
Fa’a
tuin
a fa
’ato
aga
fa’a
lau
iloa.
Og
ato
ton
u 2
01
31
. Fa
usi
a fa
’ato
aga
fa’a
lau
iloa.
2.
Fa’a
lau
iloa
avan
oa
mo
a’o
aog
a au
a
le f
a’at
ino
ga
o g
alu
eg
a m
o m
eao
la u
a
ave
iai l
e f
a’am
uam
ua
3.
Iloilo
fa’
aman
uia
ga
tala
feag
ai a
ua
le
un
aia
o le
fa’
apis
inis
iina
o n
ei a
tin
a’e
6.2
. Fa
’ati
no
a’o
aog
a i f
a’at
oag
a fa
’ala
uilo
a e
fa
’aso
ain
a ai
le t
om
ai il
e f
a’af
a’at
oag
ain
a o
tila
pia
.Fa
’aso
a le
to
mai
ile
au
faif
’aat
oag
a.O
gat
oto
nu
20
13
6.3
. Ilo
ilo v
aeg
a ta
lafe
agai
mo
le a
tin
a’e
ina
o le
fa
’afa
ato
agai
na
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta.
Fa’a
iloa
aual
a o
fa’
aman
uia
ga
o
man
aom
ia.
Fa’a
auau
7.
la f
a’a
lele
ia le
au
au
na
ga
a le
Va
eg
a o
Fa
iga
faiv
a i
le u
na
ia o
ga
lue
ga
ati
a’e
mo
le f
a’a
-fa’
ato
ag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
Ia il
oilo
ina
le f
a’at
ula
gan
a m
o le
au
fai
gal
eu
ga
ina
ia m
a-
fai o
na
fa’a
faig
alu
eg
a se
Ofi
sa T
a’it
a’i S
inia
mo
le V
aeg
a
e f
a’aF
a’at
oag
ain
a i’a
ma
fi g
ota
. O le
to
mai
fa’
apit
oa
i le
fa’a
tin
og
a o
gal
ue
ga
e p
atin
o il
e f
a’af
a’at
oag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
i to
ton
u o
Sam
oa
aem
aise
le O
fi sa
o F
aig
ava
e m
atu
a u
tiu
ti la
va. O
lo’o
man
a’o
mia
se
ua
iai l
e t
om
ai
e s
ailii
lia a
i itu
aig
a o
a’o
aog
a fa
’ap
ito
a e
tal
afe
agai
mo
ne
i to
mai
ma
agav
a’a
ese
ese
, ia
fa’a
mu
amu
a i n
ei
a’o
aog
a au
a lo
na
fa’a
lau
tele
ina.
O a
’oao
ga
fa’a
vait
aim
i
ma
a’o
aog
a m
o t
aim
i um
i ua
tata
u o
na
un
aia.
O le
fa’a
tup
ein
a o
ne
i itu
aig
a o
a’o
aog
a e
tat
au o
na
mai
oio
pe
mai
i le
mal
o p
o’o
se
feso
aso
ani m
ai f
afo
.
7.1
. Fa
’ati
no
a’o
aog
a m
o le
fa’
ale
leia
o le
au
faig
a-lu
eg
a al
e V
aeg
a e
Fa’
afa’
ato
agai
na
i’a m
a fi
go
ta.
Fa’a
iloa
itu
aig
a a’
oao
ga
o lo
o
man
a’o
mia
.2
01
31
. Fa
’ati
no
a’o
aog
a m
ana’
om
ia m
o le
au
faig
alu
eg
a.
2.
Fa’a
tin
o a
’oao
ga
man
a’o
mia
mo
le
aufa
igal
ue
ga
e f
ua
i man
a’o
ga.
3.
Fa’a
ulu
le t
alo
sag
a m
o le
fa
’afa
igal
ue
ga
o le
Ofi
sa T
a’it
a’i S
inia
.
4.
Feso
aso
ani i
a’o
aog
a m
o p
isin
isi
tum
aoti
pe
a m
ana’
om
ia.
7.2
. Fa
’ati
no
a’o
aog
a e
fu
a i l
e m
anao
ga
ua
fa’a
iloa
mai
i le
vae
ga
o lo
o i
lug
a.Fa
’ati
no
a’o
aog
aFa
’au
auin
a
7.3
. A
ve s
e t
alo
sag
a m
o le
fa’
afai
gal
ue
gai
na
o s
e
Ofi
sa T
a’it
a’i S
inia
o le
vae
ga
e f
a’af
a’at
oag
ain
a i’a
m
a fi
go
ta.
Fa’a
faig
alu
eg
a le
Ofi
sa T
a’
ita’
i S
inia
o le
vae
ga
ole
fa
’afa
’ato
agai
na
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta.
Fa’a
uau
ina
7.4
. Fa
i a’o
aog
a m
o f
a’al
apo
top
oto
ga
tum
aoti
.Fa
’ala
uilo
a m
a fa
’ati
no
ao
aog
a m
o f
a’al
apo
top
oto
ga
tum
aoti
.Fa
’au
auin
a
8.
la f
a’a
lele
ia f
eso
’ota
iga
mo
le f
a’a
fa’a
toa
ga
ina
o i’
a m
a fi
go
ta
Ia f
a’al
auilo
a m
a fa
’atu
mau
ina
ala
o fe
so’o
taig
a
fa’a
loto
ifal
e, f
a’ai
tula
gi a
em
aise
le f
a’av
a-o
-mal
o, i
ala
o s
ailii
liga,
a’o
aog
a m
a fa
utu
aga
fa’a
pit
oa
mo
le
fa’a
toag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
.
8.1
. Fa
’afa
igo
fi e
fe
so’o
taig
a m
a p
aag
a e
ao
fi a
ai le
So
saie
te a
le A
ufa
ifa’
ato
aga
mo
le
fa’a
fa’a
toag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
(S
AFA
).
Ia f
a’am
alo
sia
le a
ufa
ifa’
ato
aga
e a
la i
le f
efa
’aso
aa’i
ma
gal
ulu
e
fa’a
tasi
.
Fa’a
uau
ina
1.
Fa’a
faig
ofi
e fe
so’o
taig
a fa
’alo
toif
ale
(F
T) f
a’at
oag
ain
a o
i’a
ma
fi g
ota
(SA
FA).
2.
Fa’a
tum
auin
a fe
so’o
taig
a fa
’ait
ula
gi
fa’a
va-o
-mal
o a
ua
saili
ilig
a, a
’oao
ga
ma
fau
tuag
a fa
’ap
ito
a m
ai i
le S
PC
, U
SP,
SP
RE
P, F
AO
an
d A
CIA
R.
8.2
. Fa
’atu
mau
ina
le fe
so’o
taig
a fa
’alo
toif
ale
ma
le
Fa’
a-va
–o
-mal
o i
tula
ga
o s
ailii
liga,
a’o
aog
a m
a
fau
tuag
a fa
’ap
ito
a e
tau
ala
ma
i le
Se
cre
tari
at
of
the
Pac
ifi c
Co
mm
un
ity
(SP
C),
Un
ive
rsit
y o
f th
e S
ou
th P
acifi
c (U
SP
), S
ecr
eta
riat
of
the
Pac
ifi c
R
eg
ion
al E
nvr
ion
me
nt
Pro
gra
mm
e (S
PR
EP
),
Foo
d a
nd
Ag
ricu
ltu
re O
rgan
izat
ion
(FA
O),
ma
le
Au
stra
lian
Ce
ntr
e fo
r In
tern
atio
nal
Ag
ricu
ltu
ral
Re
sear
ch (A
CIA
R).
Ia a
van
oa
le m
atag
alu
eg
a m
o n
i a’o
aog
a m
a fa
utu
aga
fa’a
pit
oa
mo
an
a p
aag
a.
Fa’a
uau
ina
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–20188
5. Species prioritisation
5.1. Priority commodities for aquaculture in Samoa
Many species have already been the subject of experimental aquaculture trials or pilot projects in Samoa, and
more species are being added to the list. With limited staff resources and a limited operating budget, one ben-
efi t of this Aquaculture Management and Development Plan is to set priorities and focus development eff orts
on top priorities. To condense the long list of potential aquaculture commodities down to a short list of man-
ageable size, and to rank these, the feasibility of each potential commodity was assessed, including availability
of seeds, feeds, technical knowledge, required infrastructure, marketability, local versus exotic species, and use
in restocking/stock enhancement programmes. The potential economic, social, and environmental benefi ts of
each commodity were also assessed.
The Priority Matrix is presented in the table below:
BE
NE
FIT
S
HIG
H
Exo c seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii)
Marine ornamental fi sh + PCC
Mud crab
Local fresh water prawn
Giant Clams
Sea grapes (Caulerpa racemosa)
Tilapia
Mullet
Trochus
Malaysian fresh water prawn
ME
DIU
M
Lobster
Barramundi
Green snail
Milkfi sh
Seaweeds (local spp.)
Reef fi sh (grouper, red snapper...)
Sea urchins (local spp.)
Rabbi ish
Sea cucumber
LOW Fresh water eel
LOW MEDIUM HIGH
FEASIBILITY
The top six commodities that emerged from the national consultation were: giant clam, sea grapes (Caulerpa
racemosa), tilapia, mullet, trochus and Malaysian freshwater prawn, followed by local sea cucumber and lo-
cal freshwater prawns. Taking into account the limited human and fi nancial resources in Samoa to work on
all top priorities at once, the highest ranked commodities were further regrouped in order to identify the top
four commodities to be focused on during the next fi ve years, namely: 1) giant clam; 2) mullet; 3) tilapia and
4) Caulerpa.
9
5.2. High priority commodities
1. Giant clam (Hippopus spp. and Tridacna spp.)
These are fl agged as species that should continue being a priority for the Fisheries Division, both for aquacul-
ture and restocking activities. At present, spawning and larvae rearing techniques are known, and grow-out
husbandry practices have been developed. Restocking and stock enhancement programmes through com-
munity involvement have been relatively successful in several locations. Giant clams are a high value species,
prized on the marine aquarium market and considered a delicacy in Samoa. A new hatchery facility will be
established soon near Apia, in order to ensure a reliable supply of spat for culture and restocking. The establish-
ment of this clam hatchery will support the re-introduction of clams to villages with reserves established under
the Fisheries Division extension programme.
FEASIBILITY = 8 / BENEFITS = 9
Advantages Disadvantages
î high value;
î positive impact in rural communities;
î farming technology is available;
î high local and export demand;
î relevant for restocking and stock enhancement programmes;
î cultural and social importance; and
î indigenous species.
î lack of facilities; and
î lack of expertise in artifi cial breeding and spawning.
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–201810
2. Flat grey mullet (Mugil cephalus)
Mullet is considered a high value species in the Samoan local market, although it is seen as low value marine
fi nfi sh in the rest of the world. It has good potential as a euryhaline fi nfi sh species, and wild seed-stock can eas-
ily be found in certain locations. Fingerlings could also be produced by artifi cial breeding in the planned marine
hatchery. Breeding protocols are undemanding. Larvae rearing techniques and grow-out strategies have been
developed in other regions of the world, such as Southeast Asia and North Africa, with great success. These
technologies could easily be transferred to Samoa.
FEASIBILITY = 7 / BENEFITS = 8
Advantages Disadvantages
î high value in Samoa;
î indigenous species;
î low in food chain;
î broodstock are locally available; and
î grow-out strategies are well known.
î lack of technical knowledge for breeding in Samoa;
î lack of hatchery facilities; and
î no export market.
11
3. Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is viewed as the key freshwater species for developing a family or commu-
nity-based aquaculture industry in Samoa. It plays a relevant role in ensuring food and nutritional security in
rural and isolated communities, generates income from market sales, and is aff ordable and available locally
throughout the year. It needs no complicated techniques or skills and feeds low in the food chain. Several farm-
er networks already in place can ensure the long-term sustainability of the activity. Furthermore, the Fisheries
Division is currently maintaining and producing two lines of high quality GIFT and chitrilada tilapia fi ngerlings,
which are being distributed to farmers. To conclude, Nile tilapia has excellent potential, since propagation and
distribution are being carried out under several Samoan Fisheries Projects.
FEASIBILITY = 7 / BENEFITS = 8
Advantages Disadvantages
î easy to culture;
î easy to breed;
î moderate local demand;
î broodstock, facilities and capacities are available in Samoa; and
î strong, positive impact in rural communities.
î lack of feeds;
î lack of inbreeding control strategies at farm level;
î lack of marketability (demand/supply) knowledge; and
î lack of business plans at farm level.
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–201812
4. Sea grapes (Caulerpa racemosa); local name: limu fuafua
Caulerpa racemosa is a bright green alga that forms carpets in coral reef lagoons. C. racemosa is the species com-
monly harvested and sold fresh in Samoa. Its distinctive feature is its ‘bunch of grapes’ appearance. There is a
strong local market for fresh seaweed. Attempts to transport fresh C. racemosa have been unsuccessful due to rap-
id reduction in turgor once picked and hence lack of quality in transported product, although it can be exported
as a lower-value salted product. While there are plenty of sites ostensibly suitable for growth of C. racemosa, most
sea grapes species exhibit substantial temporal and spatial variability in growth rates. This inherent variability in
growth limits the use of this species in aquaculture and further research is needed. The best option with C. rac-
emosa seems to be to promote additional transplantation to support the local demand for edible seaweed. In the
past two years, several trials focused on sea grape culture have been implemented in various locations of Samoa,
with varying degrees of success. The aim of the Fisheries Division is to continue with these trials, improving and
adapting existing techniques in order to overcome most of the challenges presented by the species.
FEASIBILITY = 8 / BENEFITS = 8
Advantages Disadvantages
î local market;
î high value;
î easy to culture;
î no need for a hatchery;
î positive impact in rural communities;
î expertise is available in the country (trials ongoing);
î environmentally friendly;
î indigenous species;
î culturally important locally, and to Pacifi c Islanders in Australia and New Zealand;
î high potential for restocking; and
î staff already trained in farming techniques.
î highly vulnerable to predators (fi sh grazing); and
î extremely perishable with short shelf-life (unless salted).
13
5. Trochus (Trochus niloticus)
Breeding and larvae rearing techniques are well developed technically and are not technically demanding; tro-
chus larvae are lecithotrophic and do not need to be fed during the short larval phase. Hatchery procedures are
relatively simple and the future giant clam hatchery could also be used to rear trochus. Although the value of
the trochus fi sheries is not large, compared with the industrial fi sheries of the region, the impact of this species,
through either culture or restocking programmes, on rural communities, is quite substantial. Because it is one
of the few resources from which cash income in rural locations may be derived, it is worthy of special attention
by the Fisheries Division.
FEASIBILITY = 8 / BENEFITS = 8
Advantages Disadvantages
î high value for both shell and meat;
î very relevant for restocking programmes;
î local expertise/knowledge is available (project ongo-ing);
î low mortality during translocation; and
î easy to breed.
î motile shellfi sh;
î slow-growing; and
î cannot be grown intensively in enclosed spaces.
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–201814
6. Fresh water prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii)
There is strong local demand, and potential for import substitution, which can be met by farming prawns lo-
cally. The most effi cient freshwater prawn species for aquaculture is the giant river prawn Macrobrachium rosen-
bergii, which is not a local prawn, so would need to be introduced. This species was previously introduced to Sa-
moa from Tahiti during the late 1970s and early 1980s, but is not now present in Samoa. Local markets include
restaurants, hotels and supermarkets.
FEASIBILITY = 7 / BENEFITS = 7
Advantages Disadvantages
î local and export market;
î high value;
î positive impact in rural communities;
î hatchery and grow-out technology is available within the region; and
î very similar product to indigenous freshwater prawn ula vai.
î lack of expertise;
î lack of specifi c facilities;
î lack of aqua-feeds; and
î limited social and cultural relevance.
15
5.3. Low priority commodities
1. Local fresh water prawn (Machrobrachium lar); local name: ula vai
FEASIBILITY = 4 / BENEFITS = 7
Advantages Disadvantages
î local markets available;
î high value;
î traditional knowledge on spawning and fi shing grounds;
î small-scale capture-based culture is possible in some loca-tions; and
î low in food chain.
î lack of technical knowledge (cannot be reared in hatchery);
î needs special ponds with plastic-sheet fences (they climb out); and
î size of industry limited by availability of captured juveniles.
2. Sea cucumber (Local species): black teatfi sh (Holothuria whitmaei), white teatfi sh (Holothuria fuscogilva), curry
fi sh (Stichopus hermanni), pink fi sh (Holothuria edulis) and lollyfi sh (Holothuria atra)
FEASIBILITY = 7 / BENEFITS = 6
Advantages Disadvantages
î broodstock is locally available;
î quite signifi cant local market;
î positive impact in local communities;
î high export value (only some species); and
î breeding and grow-out technologies are know within the region.
î lack of facilities; and
î lack of experienced staff .
3. Green snail (Turbo marmoratus)
FEASIBILITY = 2 / BENEFITS = 4
Advantages Disadvantages
î easy to culture;
î overseas markets available for shell;
î technical knowledge available in the region (Tonga, SPC); and
î positive impact in local communities.
î exotic species (no broodstock available);
î limited technical knowledge locally;
î no hatchery; and
î low value.
4. Spiny lobster (Panulirus spp.)
FEASIBILITY = 3 / BENEFITS = 6
Advantages Disadvantages
î local market available;
î high value;
î wild stock are in danger;
î demand is higher than supply; and
î export market exists.
î lack of technical knowledge;
î low impact in rural communities;
î no aqua-feeds available; and
î no hatchery.
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–201816
5. Reef fi sh: groupers (Family Serranidae, Sub-family Epinephelinae, e.g. Epinephelus fuscoguttatus, Cromileptes
altivelis), red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), etc
FEASIBILITY = 6 / BENEFITS = 6
Advantages Disadvantages
î high value for export (Asian market);
î can create income and employment;
î popular in local market; and
î local species.
î limited staff capacity;
î limited facilities and resources; and
î lack of feeds.
6. Sea urchin (Class Echinoidea)
FEASIBILITY = 4 / BENEFITS = 4
Advantages Disadvantages
î consumed locally;
î indigenous species; and
î local knowledge is available.
î low value;
î lack of facilities; and
î lack of staff experience.
7. Local seaweeds (Corynocystis spp., Halymenia spp.)
FEASIBILITY = 3 / BENEFITS = 4
Advantages Disadvantages
î indigenous species. î lack of awareness; and
î lack of technical knowledge.
8. Rabbitfi sh (Siganus spp.)
FEASIBILITY = 4 / BENEFITS = 6
Advantages Disadvantages
î well-known fi sh that is locally consumed. î moderate value only;
î hard to breed;
î lack of expert knowledge; and
î can be fed with vegetables, but good feed conversion ratio (FCR) is found when fed on formulated pellet feeds.
9. Mud crab (Scylla serrata)
FEASIBILITY = 3 / BENEFITS = 8
Advantages Disadvantages
î high value;
î high market demand;
î broodstock is locally available; and
î can be fed on tuna waste.
î hard to breed and rear; and
î no artifi cial feed is available.
17
10. Sea cucumber (Holothuria scabra)
FEASIBILITY = 5 / BENEFITS = 5
Advantages Disadvantages
î export market;
î high value;
î knowledge available within the region; and
î positive impact in local communities.
î lack of expertise;
î lack of facilities;
î sandfi sh are not present in Samoa; and
î only a few species have hatchery technology available.
11. Barramundi (Lates calcarifer)
FEASIBILITY = 2 / BENEFITS = 4
Advantages Disadvantages
î overseas market;
î fi ngerlings available within the region (Australia);
î high value; and
î knowledge available within the region (Australia, Papua New Guinea).
î lack of expertise;
î lack of facilities (hatchery);
î lack of feeds;
î introduced species;
î unknown in Samoa; and
î low impact in rural communities.
12. Milkfi sh (Chanos chanos)
FEASIBILITY = 2 / BENEFITS = 6
Advantages Disadvantages
î local market (human consumption and bait);
î moderate value;
î easy to culture (no need for a hatchery);
î fry can be captured from the wild; and
î positive impact in rural communities.
î lack of expertise;
î lack of specifi c facilities;
î lack of feeds; and
î fry collection sites and seasonality are unknown.
13. Marine ornamental fi nfi sh (Chaetodon spp., Chelmon spp., Amphiprion spp.), cultured and capture-based farming
FEASIBILITY = 3 / BENEFITS = 7
Advantages Disadvantages
î export market;
î high value;
î local species (assessment of species of high value/interest already done);
î juveniles can be collected from the wild and cultured (to decrease fi sheries pressure) = Post-larvae capture and culture (PCC); and
î positive impact in rural communities.
î lack of expertise;
î lack of specifi c facilities;
î lack of feeds;
î fry collection sites and seasonality is unknown; and
î no market structure or exporter.
Samoa Aquaculture Management and Development Plan 2013–201818
14. Seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii)
FEASIBILITY = 3 / BENEFITS = 7
Advantages Disadvantages
î export market;
î low value, but world price has increased recently;
î easy to culture/no need for a hatchery; and
î positive impact in rural communities.
î lack of expertise;
î exotic species;
î highly aff ected by fi sh grazing (rabbitfi sh) and ice-ice disease; and
î no market structure.
15. Fresh water eel (Anguila spp.)
FEASIBILITY = 3 / BENEFITS = 2
Advantages Disadvantages
î high value; and
î positive impact in rural communities.
î lack of expertise;
î lack of facilities;
î lack of feeds;
î has no social/cultural relevance;
î no local demand; and
î no local interest in this species.
19
Bibliography
Anon. 2001. Fisheries Division Annual Report 2000/2001. Fisheries Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Forests, Fisheries and Meteorology. Apia, Samoa.
Bell, L.A.J. 1984. Aquaculture: A potential development for Western Samoa. Fisheries Division, Department of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries. Apia, Samoa.
Bell, L.A.J. and Ropeti, E. 1995. Western Samoa aquaculture profi le. FFA Report No. 95/18(b).
Bell, L.A.J., Ward, J. and Lakopo, M. 2003. Samoa marine biodiversity. Division of Environment. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. Apia, Samoa.
Johnston, B. 2004. Economic evaluation of aquaculture opportunities in Samoa. A joint Samoa Fisheries and AusAID Project.
Lober, M. 2002. Samoa aquaculture profi le – draft. Report prepared for the Food and Agriculture Organization Sub-Regional Offi ce for the Pacifi c Region (SAPA). Apia, Samoa.
Matsunaga, Y. c1995. Report on the visit to follow up tilapia farming in Solaua. Fisheries Division, Ministry of Agriculture, Forests, Fisheries and Meteorology. Apia, Western Samoa.
Mulipola, A. 2002. Marine resources of Samoa. Report prepared for Samoa’s National Report for the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Johannesburg, South Africa.
Popper, D.M. 1980. Baitfi sh culture project in Western Samoa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Rimmer, M., Bell, L., Lober, M. and Trevor, A. 2001. Evaluation of the potential for Aquaculture in Samoa. Project Milestone 40, September 2001. Samoa Fisheries Project Report.
TIPU 2000. Project profi le: Farming of milkfi sh. Trade, Commerce and Industry, Government of Samoa.
Uwate, K.R., Kunatuba, P., Raobati, B. and Tenakanai, C. 1984. et al, 1984. A review of aquaculture activities in the Pacifi c Islands region. PIDP, East-West Centre. Honolulu, Hawaii.
Winterstein, H. 1991b. Growth trials of Pacifi c oysters (Crassostrea gigas) in Western Samoa. Research Section, Fisheries Division. Department of Agriculture, Forests and Fisheries. Apia, Western Samoa.
Zann, L. 1991a. The inshore resources of Upolu, Western Samoa: Coastal inventory and fi sheries database. Field Report No. 5. FAO/UNDP project SAM/89/002.
Zann, L. 1991b. A review of aquaculture in Western Samoa. FAO/UNDP SAM/89/002. Field Report No. 4.
http://www.spc.int/aquaculture/site/home/index.asp
Notes
SECRETARIAT OF THE PACIFIC COMMUNITY
BP D5 • 98848 NOUMEA CEDEX • NEW CALEDONIA
Telephone: +687 26 20 00
Facsimile: +687 26 38 18
Email: [email protected]
http://www.spc.int/fame
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES
PO BOX 1874 • APIA • SAMOA
Telephone: +685 20 369
Facsimile: +685 24 292
Email: fi sh@fi sheries.gov.ws
http://www.maf.gov.ws