May 18, 2016

SAM and ESB UpdateSpring 2016

NYS 9-1-1 Coordinator’s Conference

May 18, 2016 2

Streets and

Address

Maintenance

(SAM) Program

May 18, 2016 3

SAM Address Points

6.2 million total points delivered

5.1 million primary addresses

1.1 million subaddresses

May 18, 2016 4

SAM Program

• SAM Project transitioned to SAM Program (1/2015)

• State funding committed for permanent program

• Priorities

• Finished post processing SAM Address Points

• Update NYS Streets based on Address Points

• Update NYS Streets based on DOT’s ARNOLD (CHIPS) Project

• Strategize maintenance with stakeholders

• Deploy and support GeoLynx

• Web based data maintenance tool

Where are we now?

May 18, 2016 5

SAM ProgramStage 2: Maintenance

Counties use NENA standards to:

• Review and locate addresses in Spatially Invalid

file and Exception Report

• Add new points

• Refine locations

• Map subaddresses

New York State:• Facilitates data maintenance discussions

• Provides data maintenance tools

• Provides data hosting/distribution services

May 18, 2016 6Stage 2Refine Locations

Map Subaddresses

14,976 address point edits made by counties

242,279 address point edits made by GPO

156,237 street edits made by GPO

March 2015: GeoLynx data maintenance go live

20 counties trained to date

1,732 Change Requests for streets made by counties

May 18, 2016 7

May 18, 2016 8

Accessing SAM Data SAM Program Page

Multiple Options

NYS GIS Clearinghouse

• Publically accessible

• Data updated 4x/year

• Address Point Map Service and

Geocoding Service updated 2x/month

• NYS Streets map service in development

GeoLynx Portal• Requires NY.Gov ID account

• Statewide files updated nightly

• County cuts of Address Points nightly

• County cuts of NYS Streets Sunday night

http://gis.ny.gov/streets

May 18, 2016 9

Involvement in National Addressing Programs

• National Emergency Number Association (NENA) Standards

• Civic Location Data Exchange Format

• Site/Structure Address Points

• GIS Data Model

• GIS Data Stewardship

• National States Geographic Information Council (NSGIC)

• Member of Board of Directors

• NSGIC’s liaison to NENA

• Address Committee

• NG9-1-1 Committee

• National Address Database (NAD)

• Census Geographic Support System Initiative (GSS-I)

• USPS County Project (future)

May 18, 2016 10

Emergency

Service

Boundaries

(ESB) Program

May 18, 2016 11

Emergency Service Boundaries (ESB)

• Streets, Address Points, Emergency Service Boundaries, and

PSAP Boundaries are required for NG9-1-1

• Pilot Project working with Albany County to create ESB for their

shared CAD project

• Uncovering issues, creating tools and procedures to create

NENA standard ESB for use in E911 and NG911

• Goal to create a statewide, consistent and standardized layer of ESB for NYS from existing and new data

Overview

May 18, 2016 12

Emergency Service Boundaries (ESB)

• Use the MSAG to create Emergency Service Zones (ESZ)

• Expand the address range to every theoretical address

• Odd – Even - Both

• Geocode the addresses

• Join to parcels

• Fill in the ROWs

• Dissolve the parcels to create ESZs

• Dissolve the ESZs to ESBs

Pilot Project Overview

May 18, 2016 13

MSAG geocoded to Address Points

May 18, 2016 14

Emergency Service Boundaries (ESB)

• Multi-county CAD: Albany, Rensselaer, Saratoga

• Multiple cities and towns within the counties

• All have been building their GIS in a silo

• Now their GIS data may not line up over county boundaries

• Municipal GIS data may not match county data

• Requires work to build and maintain multi county GIS data for

CAD

Pilot Project Issues

May 18, 2016 15

Emergency Service Boundaries (ESB)

• Now that we know the level of effort required to map ESBs in

one county, we need to know how many counties need ESBs

• Will send out a Survey in the near future – 5 or 6 questions

• Please complete so we know the level of effort that will be

required to create a statewide layer of ESBs for NG9-1-1

Pilot Project Survey

May 18, 2016 16

Emergency Service Boundaries (ESB)

• Prioritize counties based on survey results

• Estimate level of work and staff required

• Work with counties to create new ESB layers, or to incorporate

their existing layers

• Create one NENA standard layer of ESB for the State suitable

for NG9-1-1

• Get CAD vendors to accept NENA standard data so each

county does not have to modify the data

Next Steps

May 18, 2016 17

Questions??

Thank you!

SAM Program Web Page:http://gis.ny.gov/streets

ESB Program Web Page:http://gis.ny.gov/911

May 18, 2016 18

Update on

NENA Standards

NENA Chapter Meeting

May 18, 2016 19

NENA GIS Standards

• Civic Location Data Exchange Format (CLDXF) Standard• Breaks out addresses into smallest data elements

• Published 3/23/2014

• Site/Structure Address Point GIS Data for 9-1-1 Information Document• Where to place an address point and point placement methodologies

• Published 9/18/2015

• NG9-1-1 Data Management Requirements• Discrepancy Reports for errors discovered during data provisioning and performance reports for

processes within a NG9-1-1 system

• Published 3/10/2016

• NENA web site: www.nena.org

Published

May 18, 2016 20

NENA GIS Standards

• Detailed Functional and Interface Standards for the NENA i3 Solution• Describes how NG9-1-1 works after transition from E9-1-1• http://dev.nena.org/apps/group_public/document.php?document_id=8141&wg_abbrev=isc-ngae-i3arch

• In second Public Review with comments due 5/20/2016

• Provisioning and Maintenance of GIS data to ECRF/LVF Standard• Loading GIS data into regional, statewide & national databases for address validation and call routing

• Completed third Public Review 3/3/2016 with 47 comments received

• NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model Standard• Identifies the GIS data layers & defines attributes

• Completed Comment Review from first NENA All Committee Review

• Second All Committee Review expected early summer

• Public Review may occur by end of 2016

In Development

May 18, 2016 21

Upcoming Events

• NENA 2016 Conference & Expo• June 11-16 in Indianapolis, IN

• https://www.nena.org/?NENA2016

• NENA 9-1-1 Standards & Best Practices Conference• Formerly the NENA Development Conference

• October 9-12 in Columbus, OH

• http://www.nena.org/?sbp

National 911 Program’s “State of 9-1-1” Webinar Series

• Sign up at http://www.911.gov/webinars.html

NENA Conferences

May 18, 2016 22

NG9-1-1 NOW Coalition

• Formed by NENA, NASNA, and iCERT• Stated Goal:

“By the end of the year 2020, all 911 systems and centers in all 56 states and territories will have sufficiently funded, standards-based, end-to-end, IP-based 911 capabilities, and will have retired legacy 911 systems, without any degradation in service to the public.”

• GIS data preparedness implications:• Every PSAP must minimally have PSAP Boundaries, Emergency Service Boundaries and

Road Centerline GIS data layers, with an Address Point layer strongly recommended• Every ALI address must map to an Address Point (or minimally to a Street Centerline)• Every MSAG range must be within a Street Centerline range(s)• PSAP and ESB boundary layers must not have gaps or overlaps

• NSGIC Supports NG9-1-1 NOW Coalition

• Web site: www.ng911now.org

Accelerated Implementation of NG911

May 18, 2016 23

Federal Communications Commission

• Federal advisory committee to FCC• Recommended actions PSAPs can take to optimize their security, operations, and

funding as they implement NG911• Section 5.9.1.2 Operational Considerations, assumes PSAPs/9-1-1 Authorities:

• Have GIS data to a level of granularity that approximates the tabular MSAG• Have performed preliminary reconciliation between their GIS data and their MSAGs

• If PSAPs/9-1-1 Authorities have not yet done this work:• Preparatory work to transition to NG9-1-1 will be substantially elongated• Reconciliation work between their GIS and USPS address data should be undertaken

ASAP as this is one of the first steps in NG9-1-1 data transition

• https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-16-179A2.pdf

Task Force on Optimal PSAP Architecture Report