Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Salt Reduction Initiative
of the Pan American Forum for Action on NCDs
Report for the Third Meeting of the SaltSmart Consortium
28-29 October, 2014
WHO/PAHO Office, Brasilia, Brazil
2
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
I. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 3
II. Welcome and Agenda ..................................................................................................................... 4
III. Brazil Highlights .............................................................................................................................. 5
IV. Progress with Salt/Sodium Reduction Targets and Other Initiatives ............................................ 7
Dietary salt reduction in Barbados ..................................................................................................... 7
Proposal for a regulation to implement Chile’s "Law 20,606 on nutritional composition and
advertising of foods" and Chile’s voluntary sodium reduction strategy ........................................... 8
Costa Rica’s progress with targets and other initiatives ................................................................... 8
Consumers International – your rights, our mission ......................................................................... 9
Healthy Caribbean Coalition............................................................................................................... 9
American Heart Association Sodium Reduction Initiative .............................................................. 10
International Food and Beverage Alliance ...................................................................................... 10
V. Advancing Harmonization with Regional Targets ......................................................................... 12
The Concept Note on Target Harmonization ................................................................................... 12
Principles to Guide Target Harmonization – the Consensus Statement ......................................... 13
Proposed Regional Targets .............................................................................................................. 13
VI. Consortium Roles and Contributions in Target Dissemination, Maintenance and Monitoring .. 15
VII. Summary of Agreements and Actions to Advance Target Harmonization ................................. 18
VIII. Next Steps .................................................................................................................................. 19
APPENDIX 1: Concept Note on Target Harmonization ......................................................................... 20
APPENDIX 2: List of Participants at the Third Meeting of the SaltSmart Consortium ......................... 24
APPENDIX 3: Meeting Agenda .............................................................................................................. 27
1
Executive Summary
Consistent with the SaltSmart Consortium’s Strategic Plan 2013-18 that priorized harmonization of
salt/sodium reduction targets for the Region, the Concept Note on agreeing on harmonized regional
targets for salt/sodium concentration in key food categories in the Americas, was prepared as
preparatory part of 3rd
meeting. The Note proposed regional targets (maximum values) for nine key
food categories and a process for the Consortium to agree to, maintain and monitor the targets. The
Draft Consensus Statement was also prepared to outline a set of principles to guide the Consortium
members in their working together on the proposed process.
Using the Concept Note as the basis for discussion, at the Brasilia meeting, Consortium members
were able to achieve the following objectives to advance regional harmonization of targets:
� Consortium consensus on principles to guide how it can agree on, maintain and monitor
regional targets
� Consortium agreement on proposed regional targets for key food categories
� Consortium identification of roles and contributions of each sector represented in the
Consortium in adopting, disseminating and monitoring regional targets, and how to support
country capacity building to adopt regional targets or set unique national targets
The following are the actions agreed to by Consortium members to advance with target
harmonization:
Action on the Consensus Statement
� The Consortium accepted the principles in the Consensus Statement. A small working group
will adjust the Statement based on discussions and will circulate the new version as soon as
possible.
Action on Regional Targets
� The Consortium accepted the premise on which the regional targets are based and the
proposed values. The sub-group will add a category for condiments and sauces; identify
definitions for the food categories; and highlight the lower value from the range of existing
targets for each food category.
Action on Disseminating Regional Targets
� Each Consortium member will disseminate the regional targets through their channels.
PAFNCDs will circulate the regional targets with the Policy Statement to governments in the
2
Region, and will work with Consortium members to compile where the targets have been
disseminated.
Action on Monitoring Adherence to Regional Targets
� PAFNCDs will approach sub-regional food technology institutions and relevant WHO
collaborating centres to explore capacity and willingness to collect label data from industry
to serve a regional initiative. NGOs will approach the George Institute about extending the
training for its iPhone app. The food industry representatives agreed to supply label data to a
central database.
Action on Resource Mobilization
� A sub-group of the Consortium will prepare a funding proposal for nutrition label monitoring.
Participating will be Hubert Linders (CI), Adrianna Blanco (Costa Rica), Mary L’Abbé (Canada),
Maisha Hutton (Healthy Caribbean Coalition), Eduardo Nilson (MOH Brazil) and Maria Roza
Rabanal (IFBA Latin America). The basis for the proposal will be how by using a “food switch”
mobile application, the baseline salt/sodium concentrations for the key food categories can be
determined from food labels and how the values will be reassessed in two years.
With additional impetus from the American Heart Association, the Consortium also agreed to
advance further with social marketing:
Action on Social Marketing
A sub-group of the Consortium will prepare a proposal for the next full Consortium meeting that is
to articulate a way forward for social marketing. Participants will be Diana McGhie (AHA), Maisha
Hutton (HCC), Elizabeth Vargas (UNILEVER), Hasan Hutchinson (Health Canada), the PAHO/WHO
Collaborating Centre at the University of South Florida and the PAHO secretariat.
3
I. Background
The global target of 30% relative reduction in salt/sodium intake is a means by which the
populations of WHO Member States can reach the recommended intake level of <2000mg sodium
per day. For the Americas Region, WHO/PAHO encourages achievement of the recommended intake
by 2020.
As of December 2013, there were formal national initiatives to reduce the overconsumption of
salt/sodium in 11 countries in the Americas – Argentina, Barbados, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Columbia,
Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay and Uruguay – plus the National Salt Reduction Initiative
(NSRI) in the US, an entity outside the national government. Eight have targets and timelines for
reduced salt/sodium in specified food categories: Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the NSRI have
exclusively voluntary targets; Argentina, Chile and Ecuador have both voluntary and regulated
components to their approaches (the regulations require warning labels on packaged products that
exceed upper limits for critical nutrients including sodium); and Paraguay has regulated the salt
content of bread.
The SaltSmart Consortium in its Strategic Plan 2013-18 agreed to advance the harmonization of
targets and timelines for reducing salt/sodium content within common food groups; and to promote
and implement reformulations to reduce the salt/sodium content in a group of agreed-upon
products, leveraging existing national and industry efforts. The Consortium recognizes that
harmonization will leverage the multisectoral efforts directed at dietary salt reduction in the Region,
benefitting national strategies to improve the quality of the food supply and food industry product
processing: countries without targets can take advantage of the targets and timelines already in
place and the lessons learned; consumers across the Region will be in a better position to achieve
the recommended intake and the associated health gains; and food companies can migrate to
harmonized formulations for same-products supplied to markets in the Americas.
To proceed with regional target harmonization, a sub-group of the Consortium looked into five
countries in the Region where initiatives with target and timeline setting are the most advanced as
of the fall of 2014 – Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the NSRI. The experiences in these countries
supply the evidence that salt/sodium reduction targets are feasible and acceptable. Each of the
initiatives identified food categories specific to the roles of salt/sodium in formulations and
established targets with timelines to reduce the use of salt/sodium through negotiations between
public health authorities and food industries, assisted by independent food technology experts and
in some cases with inputs of consumers.
A key lesson taken from the most advanced countries is that targets that are maximum values
(upper limits) for salt/sodium concentrations in food products are the most straightforward concept
4
with which governments, consumers and the food industry can work. An important finding was that
a number of broad food categories that contribute substantive amounts of salt/sodium to the diet
are common to all the countries. The sub-group combined these two aspects into a Concept Note on
agreeing on harmonized regional targets for salt/sodium concentration in key food categories in the
Americas. The Note had proposed regional targets (maximum values) for nine key food categories
and a process for the Consortium to agree to, maintain and monitor the targets. The sub-group also
prepared a Consensus Statement to confirm a set of principles to guide the Consortium members in
their working together on the proposed process.
Using the Concept Note as the basis for discussion, with this meeting, the Consortium was to
achieve the following objectives to advance regional harmonization of targets:
� Consortium consensus on principles to guide how it can agree on, maintain and monitor
regional targets
� Consortium agreement on proposed regional targets for key food categories
� Consortium identification of roles and contributions of each sector represented in the
Consortium in adopting, disseminating and monitoring regional targets, and how to support
country capacity building to adopt regional targets or set unique national targets
The meeting also provided an opportunity for countries, civil society organizations and food industry
representatives to give updates on national target setting and other relevant initiatives, and to
respond to the proposal for regional targets.
II. Welcome and Agenda
Zohra Abaakouk, Coordinator for Social Determinants of Health, Health Risks, NCDs & Mental Health
in the PAHO office in Brazil, welcomed participants. She acknowledged the importance of the
Consortium’s work in mobilizing multiple sectors towards the common goal of dietary salt/sodium
reduction. She stressed its important contribution to the prevention and control of diet-related
noncommunicable diseases.
This report briefly outlines the presentations made during the meeting and summarizes the
discussions that followed. It concludes with actions that Consortium members agreed to to
advance with target harmonization and outlines next steps with another Consortium objective
– regional social marketing. Complete presentations are posted on the PAHO website at
http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10203&Itemid=40
323&lang=en
5
Patricia Jaime, Coordinator for Food and Nutrition in the Brazilian Ministry of Health greeted
participants on behalf of the Government of Brazil. Brazil has already demonstrated reductions in
salt/sodium content in selected food groups and reached the 2015 targets. The success underpins
Brazil’s new nutrition guidelines.
Branka Legetic welcomed participants on behalf of the WHO/PAHO and PAFNCDs and reviewed
progress with regional dietary salt reduction. In the first phase of the initiative, the Expert Group
supporting it produced several technical documents now compiled in Salt-Smart Americas – a guide
to country-level action
(http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=21554&Itemid).
Now in its second phase, the dietary salt reduction initiative in the Americas is focusing on
implementation. WHO/PAHO and the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) that now advises the initiative
are supporting three levels of countries: those most advanced that have multiple food categories
with targets and timelines; countries taking preliminary steps with single food categories, the most
common being bread; and countries that anticipate taking action.
In 2012, the SaltSmart Consortium was established on the PAFNCDs platform and produced a
Strategic Plan. At its first meeting, the Consortium priorized two of the Plan objectives: social
marketing and regional target harmonization, areas with existing capacity. At its subsequent
meeting, it explored a social marketing process.
This third meeting of the Consortium is strategic. It is a significant opportunity in that the targets
and timelines in five of the most advanced countries in the Region amount to a critical mass of
evidence of the salt content reductions that are technically feasible and acceptable to consumers.
Guided by the TAG, the Consortium using the PAFNCDs platform mechanisms is in the position to
agree to a set of regional targets for key food categories based on targets that already exist and to
disseminate them across the Region. To this end, during this meeting Consortium members will
consider a Concept Note on target harmonization and a Consensus Statement on a course of action.
III. Brazil Highlights
Brazil’s second edition of dietary guidelines (2014) – Patricia Jaime
The underpinning for Brazil’s latest dietary guidelines is that health is a basic human right
warranting support and protection, and by extension healthy diet is based on broader concepts of
food security and intersectoral health promotion. Unlike other national food guides, Brazil’s
guidelines are based on evidence that people are changing their eating patterns and as such, its key
messages emphasize behaviour:
� Make foods and freshly prepared dishes and meals the basis of the diet.
6
� Be sure oils, fats, sugar and salt are used in moderation in culinary preparations.
� Limit the intake of ready-to-consume products and avoid those that are ultra-processed.
Discussion
• How will Brazil change its approach to nutrition surveillance to correspond to the new
guidelines?
To date, monitoring food consumption has involved population and administrative surveys
and nutrition surveillance. There will be a change in surveillance processes to capture the
guideline’s emphasis on behaviours e.g. new indicators will be markers specific to the eating
patterns and consumption of ultra-processed foods.
Brazil NCD Action Plan 2011-2022 – Eduardo Nilson representing Deborah Malta
The Brazilian government is committed to an NCD Action Plan with an intersectoral approach,
having engaged approximately 20 government ministries in its elaboration plus NGOs, universities,
civil society and the private sector. The key risk factors being addressed are tobacco use, harmful
use of alcohol, unhealthy diets and physical inactivity, and action areas are prevention and health
promotion, integral care and surveillance, monitoring and evaluation.
Partnerships for health promotion are based on voluntary agreements between health authorities
and e.g. food industries to reduce dietary salt intake and the media on campaigns to prevent
smoking and encourage fish consumption. Brazil has also advanced with laws on tobacco and
alcohol control and anticipates the same approach regarding e.g. food marketing, tax incentives for
healthy foods and disincentives for unhealthy foods. Priorities with health care are access to free
medicines, prevention of cervical and breast cancer, urgent care and primary health care. The next
step is involving partners in monitoring and evaluation.
Brazil’s progress with food reformulation and monitoring of results – Eduardo Nilson
Monitoring whether biannual sodium reduction targets have been met has involved checking food
labels, conducting laboratory analysis of product samples and following the use of sodium-based
ingredients by food industries. Findings are that there have been reductions not only in the upper
limits of sodium content in food products but also in the average sodium levels of products. The
food companies that have signed agreements have influenced the whole market in that companies
that have not signed agreements have also reduced their sodium use. New targets are now needed
for some of the categories to achieve further reductions. There is continued monitoring of targets
for 2012 and 2013 and of population impacts through surveys.
7
Discussion
• How does Brazil deal with food companies that do not achieve the targets?
Given that Brazil’s targets are voluntary, in cases where a food company does not achieve
them, public health authorities will initiate communications to discuss obstacles and work with
the company on a plan to reach the national targets. An underlying incentive for food
companies to respect voluntary targets is the understanding that authorities are willing to
consider fiscal or legal measures to ensure that targets are met.
• What mechanisms and structures are supporting Brazil is its multisectoral approach?
Brazil’s culture of democratic engagement and public consultations is underpinning its
progress. Councils are one mechanism that brings together multiple sectors e.g. one convened
on malnutrition and hunger has evolved to deal with NCDs and micronutrients. There are also
interministerial chambers; the one for food and nutrition security is responsible for an
intersectoral strategy on obesity. A challenge with the multisectoral mechanisms is monitoring
the performance of non-health sectors towards a health objective. Indicators are evolving e.g.
adding teaching of health status as an indicator in education.
IV. Progress with Salt/Sodium Reduction Targets and Other Initiatives
Three countries presented updates, responding to three prompts:
� Have main sources of salt/sodium in the diet been identified in your country population?
� Have food groups for reformulation been selected?
� Is there a monitoring system for following changes in salt/sodium in food?
Dietary salt reduction in Barbados – Trevor Hassell
The final report for the Barbados Sodium Intake Survey is expected before the end of 2014. Its
principle aim was to determine a baseline mean intake of dietary sodium in adults using 24-hour
urine sampling. Its secondary aim is to identify the main sources of dietary sodium in the diet.
Regarding NCDs, civil society is involved in preparing national/regional status reports to inform a call
for action on NCDs in the Caribbean community. There is indication of possible funding support for
specific programmes for blood pressure control and population dietary salt reduction in seven
Caribbean countries.
8
Proposal for a regulation to implement Chile’s "Law 20,606 on nutritional composition and
advertising of foods" and Chile’s voluntary sodium reduction strategy – Luisa Kipreos
The public discussions on Chile’s new law are finalized. The law sets upper limits for sodium, sugars,
fats and calories per serving of selected liquid and solid food products, and requires front-of-pack
warnings when limits are exceeded. With Chileans experiencing transitions in lifestyles and
nutrition, the new law intends to assist consumers in understanding the nutrient and caloric profiles
of the food products they are purchasing and give food companies incentive to reformulate.
With bread, the basis for the now regulated sodium content was the reductions that bakeries
achieved voluntarily. For other key sources of sodium in the diet, in particular processed meats and
cheeses, the sectors are not well organized (compared to the bread sector) and responses to
voluntary targets have been weak. The new law is allowing 24 months for product reformulations
after which warning labels will be required if limits are exceeded.
Costa Rica’s progress with targets and other initiatives – Adrianna Blanco-Metzler
Costa Rica has used national household budget surveys to track the main sources of salt in the diet;
the next survey is expected in 2019-2020 and will include collection of 24-hour urine samples to
confirm sodium intake. The most recent survey has shown that a primary source of salt in the diet is
condiments that are added during home cooking. While health authorities made local producers of
condiments aware of the issue at preliminary meetings, a number of obstacles to reformulation
were identified: baseline data on sodium content are not consistently available as nutrition labeling
is not mandatory; there are no current targets to guide reformulations for condiments; and even if
targets were available, small and medium enterprises (SME) in the sector indicate that they lack the
capacity to reformulate.
Since 2012, Costa Rica has been part of an international project coordinated by the George Institute
in Australia that involves countries around the world collecting food label data for the most
common global-brand products and submitting them to a central database. These data represent a
baseline for sodium content (and other nutrients) for these products in each participating country
and allows comparison of products between countries. Data from more than 5000 labels have been
collected to date In Costa Rica. Subsequent data collection for the same products will capture
changes in the nutrient profiles.
9
Three civil society organizations presented updates, responding to three prompts:
� How is your organization supporting salt/sodium reduction activities in the region?
� What is the capacity and interest of your organization to support dissemination of regional
targets?
� Does your organization have the ability to support monitoring of regional target
implementation e.g. collect label data?
Consumers International – your rights, our mission – Hubert Linders
CI is promoting a framework convention on unhealthy food control similar to the FCTC, with the goal
of making healthy foods accessible to all consumers. Specific to dietary salt/sodium reduction, CI for
Latin America working with PAHO has set up ALASS (Acción Latino-Americana de Sal y Salud), the
regional counterpart of WASH that provides information for consumers and professionals in
Spanish. CI is working on strengthening and consolidating ALASS as a network. One feature is an
interactive map with countries in the Region showing advances in salt/sodium reduction through
legislation, voluntary agreements, industry efforts and civil society findings.
It is anticipated that CI members and other civil society groups will undertake the monitoring
activities proposed in the Concept Note on target harmonization. Needed are protocols, capacity
building and resources.
Healthy Caribbean Coalition – Maisha Hutton
HCC is supporting salt reduction activities in the Caribbean through: ongoing education e.g.
publishing a weekly newsletter, posting on HCC social media and other member websites; and
supporting the annual WASH activities, the Barbados Sodium Intake Survey and the PAFNCDs
SaltSmart Consortium since its inception. HCC will also be supporting the planned civil society salt
reduction initiative to involve seven Caribbean countries.
HCC has the interest and capacity to support dissemination of regional targets; as to supporting the
monitoring of uptake of regional targets by e.g. collecting label data, HCC has the interest but not
the capacity.
10
American Heart Association Sodium Reduction Initiative – Diana Vaca McGhie
AHA has three strategic priorities to reduce sodium intake at the population level: support federal
sodium targets; increase consumer demand; and coordinate scientific responses. Specific to its
consumer campaign, objectives are to increase awareness, inspire behaviour change and build an
audience of supporters. AHA is promoting “life’s simple 7” to achieve its 2020 Impact Goal – a 20%
improvement in health status relative to seven risk factors (one of which is healthy diet); and
improving cardiovascular health by 20% while reducing deaths from CVD and stroke by 20%. Sodium
intake of <1500mg/day is a feature in healthy diet. AHA’s overarching logo for the 2020 initiative is
“Life is Why”.
Food industry representatives responded to three prompts:
� On 15 September 2014, IFBA renewed its worldwide commitment to health and wellness. How
does the commitment apply to salt/sodium reduction in the Americas Region?
� What would be your organization’s contribution to encouraging other food companies and food
sectors to adopt regional targets?
� What would be the role of the food and beverage industry in supporting the monitoring process
for regional targets?
International Food and Beverage Alliance – Maria Roza Rabanal
IFBA members made their first collective commitment to the WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical
Activity and Health (2004) in 2008. Members enhanced their commitment to WHO in September
2014 in response to the 2011 UN Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting on the Prevention
and Control of NCDs and WHO’s Global Action Plan (2013-2020) for NCD prevention and control.
Specific to sodium, each IFBA member will be announcing an approach to sodium reduction if
applicable to the company’s portfolio. To date, one of Mondelez’s stated actions has been 10%
reduction in sodium in its current food portfolio.
Alliance of Food and Beverage Associations in Latin America (ALAIAB) – Strategy to Strengthen the
Food and Beverage Industry in Latin America – Diego Hekimian
ALAIAB is a relatively new entity; its board of directors was elected and organizing statutes
approved in May 2014. Association members are currently in 14 countries. Key objectives are to
expand membership and to strengthen the image and positioning of food and beverage industries
throughout the Region. The Alliance frames industry respect for voluntary agreements for sodium
reduction as consistent with one of its values – to contribute to society and governments. Examples
are the agreements made by COPAL in Argentina and ABIA in Brazil along with those made by
product-specific trade associations in both countries.
11
Discussion
• How will IFBA’s renewed worldwide commitment to health and wellness, declared in
September 2014, relate to salt/sodium reduction in the Region?
By the end of 2014, each IFBA member will make public its specific commitments to improving
the nutrient profiles of its food products. Commitments like these need to go beyond IFBA to
include small and medium enterprises in as many countries as possible.
• Monitoring the salt/sodium content of breads from small local bakeries is posing a challenge in
Brazil as none of the establishments label their products. How does Chile monitor small bakery
breads?
To fulfill the requirements of the new regulation, public health authorities have taken samples
from artisanal bakeries for analysis. Currently there is capacity for product analysis in the
Metropolitan area; the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Institute are working to set up
four other centres in the country to analyze samples.
• Why has Chile set a two-year window for the food industry to complete reformulations?
After two years the new law will be enforced. During the two years, public health authorities
will be encouraging food sectors as needed to reformulate.
• What is the extent of the controversy in Central and South America around the science
supporting dietary salt reduction?
In Brazil, the salt industries represented by the Salt Institute are fuelling the controversy. Brazil
is countering with data supplied by e.g. WASH.
In North America the food industry is resourcing a continuation of the controversy despite
having publicly agreed to voluntary salt/sodium reductions. Food companies must have an
internal consistency regarding the issue.
• How is the AHA working with CDC and the FDA?
AHA is promoting a more aggressive target for sodium intake (<1500mg Na/day) than the
other institutions. AHA’s added value is in its increasing support to consumers and elevating
the urgency of salt/sodium reduction policies needed at federal and state levels.
• What is the capacity of civil society for product monitoring?
Food formulations differ depending on the country. In very general terms, countries in the
“south” have less healthy foods than in the “north”. But no matter the region, civil society
organizations can undertake product monitoring e.g. the WASH initiative, by taking advantage
12
of available instruments and mechanisms e.g. the George Institute application. Nevertheless
they need resources; they have limited capacities.
V. Advancing Harmonization with Regional Targets
The Concept Note on target harmonization – Norm Campbell and Mary L’Abbé, WHO/PAHO TAG,
Consortium sub-group on target harmonization
The Concept Note outlines four steps for the Consortium to advance regional harmonization of
targets: confirm the role of regional targets, agree on target values, promote and disseminate them
and monitor progress. At this meeting the Consortium is in a position to take the first two steps –
agree on the role of regional targets, confirmed through a Consensus Statement, and agree on
proposed regional target values based on existing targets for common key food categories. For the
latter two steps – dissemination of regional targets and monitoring their adoption – the Consortium
will examine the options presented in the Concept Note and decide on how to take these two steps
forward.
This meeting is an opportunity to build on the initiatives in the Region that are the most advanced
with targets and timelines for salt/sodium reduction. Their approaches and experiences have
already been distilled in the Guide for Setting Targets and Timelines to Reduce the Salt Content of
Food, published by PAHO in 2013, directed at countries that intend to set unique national targets. In
broader terms, the Guide is to foster collaboration and harmonization of approaches, and support
expansion and consistency of targets.
The targets that have been agreed to in countries can be further disseminated. Referring to the
maximum target values that a number of countries have set for key food categories, this Consortium
can by consensus agree to regional harmonized targets – maximum values (upper limits) for specific
food categories to guide countries that to date have not established their own targets.
The starting points for this meeting are therefore a Concept Note on target harmonization – setting
regional targets; a Consensus Statement that sets out the principles by which the Consortium can
agree to, maintain and monitor regional targets; and a table of proposed regional harmonized
maximum targets adapted from Appendix 1 in the Guide (Targets and timelines for food categories
common in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the NSRI (updated in October 2014)).
In the table of proposed targets that the Consortium will consider, the food categories selected
were identified as major sources of salt/sodium in two or more countries, and maxima targets were
preferred from among the target types that the various countries have chosen. Fundamental to
13
basing harmonized regional targets on existing targets is that the latter have been set after
extensive consultations.
Discussion
• The regional targets proposed are maximum values. Four countries in the Region have
maximum values for multiple food categories (Argentina, Brazil, Canada and Chile). Where at
least two of the countries have a maximum value for a common food category, the highest
value was taken as the regional target.
• Regional targets, as upper limits, can only influence foods that are outliers at the high end,
whose salt/sodium content is higher than the regional target.
• Maximum values for food categories are more readily understood and accepted than averages
or sales-weighted-averages, and between countries, are most readily transferable for common
food categories. Regional maxima are a reasonable first step with target harmonization for the
Region.
• The extent of similarity or difference among products in a food category determines whether
sub-categories are needed. Definitions for the food categories will be clarified.
Principles to Guide Target Harmonization – the Consensus Statement – Branka Legetic
The Consensus Statement has both the principles to guide the Consortium in accepting harmonized
regional targets and a “call to action”. With harmonization in the Consortium’s Strategic Plan and
with a working version of proposed regional targets in hand, agreement on the principles in the
Consensus Statement will move this objective forward.
Proposed Regional Targets – Mary L’Abbé
The principles to guide the Consortium’s agreement to regional targets are consistent with the
principles that countries applied to determine their national targets:
– Countries priorized food categories that contributed significant amounts to salt/sodium
intakes. The proposed food categories for target harmonization are among the categories
selected by at least two of the four countries with maximum target values (upper limits). For
most of the food categories, the categories are broad and the targets have a relative
consistency in the Americas.
14
– Countries set their targets through extensive consultations, with advice that the targets
were technically feasible and that they respected the characteristics and roles of
salt/sodium for the food categories. Choosing the highest value from the range of maximum
targets to be a regional target for a food category is the least stringent approach to
harmonization.
- The timeline target year of 2016 is consistent with the proposed two-year approach for
review.
Discussion
• Other Regions are taking similar approaches. The EU community has 15 common food
categories with maximum values; countries are to choose five categories that are priorities in
national contexts. Across the EU, out of the 15 categories, five are most consistently selected.
For the Pacific Islands where targets do not exist, maximum values were determined from
external sources and will be re-visited over time.
• Regional targets can be useful to transnational food companies to guide the formulations of
same-food portfolios. They can potentially facilitate common market activities related to
standardizing food imports and exports. Within countries, because regional targets are
maximum values, compliance amongst SME should be easier than with other types of targets.
• For Paraguay, the regional targets will be useful as guides for national industries and if
accepted at MERCOSUR, will make imported products also compliant. Paraguay’s legislation on
salt/sodium content of bread has already taken effect; bread has been evaluated at 509mg
Na/100g, below the proposed regional target.
• Chile has demonstrated that for bread, 400 mg Na/100g – a substantially lower target value
than the proposed regional target – is also feasible. The lower values in the ranges for the food
categories are equally legitimate targets for the categories.
• Columbia is in the process of setting targets and timelines. The utility of the regional targets is
clear – there is no need for national targets to be above the highest maximum values already
set.
• Governments and food companies can use the existing targets as “reference values”. Each of
the food categories has a range of maximum targets. The national target for a food category
should be less than the highest value in the range but countries can be more ambitious.
Regional targets do not preclude countries from setting lower more stringent targets. The
lowest values in the ranges are in fact the current optimal targets that governments and food
industries should be aiming for.
15
• For the Caribbean, regional targets are practical, realistic and relevant, and coming from
WHO/PAHO, also legitimate. Small countries can be inspired to act when there is action and
good examples elsewhere. Agreement on regional targets is a test for the Consortium as they
will be useful for the Region.
• Regional targets are relevant in the context of MERCOSUR, specifically the working group on
food and nutrition security that is preparing its action plan. With the key broad food
categories having been defined with industry in a number of countries, all based on the role of
salt/sodium in formulations, they accommodate the differences in details within a category
that may be found in different countries. Selecting the current highest maximum value from
the range of maxima to be the regional target for a food category gives governments and the
food industry flexibility and confidence to adopt it or a lower target from the range as all the
values have been demonstrated as feasible.
• These initial regional values are a feasible option as national targets for countries that lack
data or capacity to establish unique national targets. This way the number of countries in the
Region active in reducing salt/sodium intake can grow. As countries gradually achieve their
respective maximum targets or the regional targets, the ranges of maximum values for food
categories will shift downwards and a new set of lower regional targets can be established.
Over time, the benefits of lower salt/sodium intake will be equitably distributed across the
Region.
• A key food category that needs to be addressed and assigned regional targets is condiments
and sauces. These are added during home cooking and are an important and increasing source
of salt/sodium in Costa Rica and generally in Central America.
VI. Consortium Roles and Contributions in Target Dissemination, Maintenance and
Monitoring
Discussion
• How best to reach countries without targets?
The Guide for Setting Targets and Timelines for Reducing the Salt Content of Food (2013) is the
primary resource for countries that intend to determine unique national targets. The regional
targets proposed now must nevertheless be disseminated as widely as possible as they are
relevant to countries with and without the data and capacity to set unique targets. Regional
values should be central in meetings with relevant food industry sectors.
16
Civil society can use its networks and community channels to raise awareness of the targets
e.g. ALASS accounts for 15 countries in the Region. Regional targets can be supplied first to the
associations in ALASS as the norms they are to respect and promote. These associations can
then disseminate them further, and the ALASS network itself is expected to grow.
Dissemination needs to also reach societies of health professionals.
The regional targets should be disseminated to the entities that endorsed the original Policy
Statement on salt/sodium reduction and otherwise, should be disseminated along with the
Policy Statement as broadly as possible. The PAFNCDs and the Consortium can encourage
them to use and/or disseminate them within their respective countries and networks.
The Latin American alliance of food and beverage associations (ALAIAB) is prepared to
participate in disseminating and monitoring the regional targets among its members.
• How best to monitor adherence to regional targets?
The ALAS website can be a platform for making public the reformulation pledges that food
companies make in countries.
In Brazil, the government, food industries and civil society are all collecting nutrient profile
data. Government laboratories examine label data and ANVISA the health surveillance agency
conducts chemical analyses. Government data are considered “official” as they are based on
label information and chemical analyses.
The issue at hand is the collection of data in countries that do not have the capacity to collect
label information or to chemically analyze food products. Nutrition labels may not be
mandatory and laboratory analyses require rigorous methodologies to be reliable.
Monitoring must be feasible and sustainable, and account for all the countries in the Region.
Baselines for salt/sodium concentrations for the key food categories must be determined now
and the concentrations reassessed every two years to check if regional targets are taking hold.
The food industry considers label data (+/- allowed margins of error) to be more reliable than
data from chemical analyses. Because of a lack of standardization in practices, different
laboratories have been found to produce different values for nutrient concentrations.
To enforce its law on maximum sodium concentrations per food category, Argentina has
designated specific laboratories to conduct analyses of samples for each food category, this
way addressing the issue of standardization.
17
The food industry can supply label data. Outstanding are selection of independent institution
(possibly one of WHO Collaborative centers) that would receive and process the data, the
mechanisms for supplying and receiving the data and extent of their analysis. Needed are
criteria to select an institution to collect label data – using a simple and flexible approach to
apply only to the key food categories with regional targets. The institution must be willing to
be a partner in piloting a process and have the capacity to scale up. Resources will need to be
mobilized.
To be explored is an opportunity to apply the George Institute iPhone method to more broadly
collect brand-label data. A regional initiative to collect data combined with the George
Institute project would significantly add value to label data collection on a global scale.
18
VII. Summary of Agreements and Actions to Advance Target Harmonization
Action on the Consensus Statement
The Consortium accepted the principles in the Consensus Statement. Small working group will
adjust the Statement based on discussions and will circulate the new version as soon as possible.
Action on Regional Targets
The Consortium accepted the premise on which the regional targets are based and the proposed
values. The working group will add a category for condiments and sauces; identify definitions for
the food categories; and highlight the lower value from the range of existing targets for each
food category. A new table of targets will be circulated.
Action on Disseminating Regional Targets
Each Consortium member will disseminate the regional targets through its channels. PAFNCDs
will circulate the regional targets with the Policy Statement to governments in the Region, and will
work with Consortium members to compile where the targets have been disseminated.
Action on Monitoring Adherence to Regional Targets
PAFNCDs will approach sub-regional food technology institutions and relevant WHO
collaborating centres to explore capacity and willingness to collect label data from industry to
serve a regional initiative. NGOs will approach the George Institute about extending the training
for its iPhone app. The food industry representatives agreed to supply label data to a central
database.
Action on Resource Mobilization
A sub-group of the Consortium will prepare a funding proposal for nutrition label monitoring.
Participating will be Hubert Linders (CI), Adrianna Blanco (Costa Rica), Mary L’Abbé (Canada),
Maisha Hutton (Healthy Caribbean Coalition), Eduardo Nilson (MOH Brazil) and Maria Roza Rabanal
(IFBA Latin America). The basis for the proposal will be how baseline salt/sodium concentrations
for the key food categories can be determined from food labels and how the values will be
reassessed in two years.
19
VIII. Next Steps
To Advance Further with Social Marketing – Diana McGhie, American Heart Association (AHA)
AHA has been testing messages on dietary sodium reduction aimed at consumers. The messages
may be adaptable to e.g. the English Caribbean working with the Healthy Caribbean Coalition. AHA’s
instruments and methods may also inform social marketing initiatives for Central and South
American countries. The WHO collaborating centre on social marketing at the University of South
Florida will be engaged.
Specific formative research will be necessary on which to base a social marketing process. Messages
need to be culturally appropriate and aligned to the knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of
consumers in defined markets. The Consortium will need to harness the marketing expertise of the
food industry.
Action on Social Marketing
A sub-group of the Consortium will prepare the proposal for the next meeting of the
Consortium to articulate a way forward for social marketing. Participants will be Diana
McGhie (AHA), Maisha Hutton (HCC), Elizabeth Vargas (UNILEVER), Hasan Hutchinson (Health
Canada), the PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre at the University of South Florida and the PAHO
secretariat.
20
APPENDIX 1: Concept Note on Target Harmonization
Concept Note – Agreeing on regional targets for the salt/sodium concentrations in
key food categories in the Americas
Definitions
Key food categories – the most common food categories selected for reformulation of salt/sodium
content that have been identified in at least two of the five initiatives in the Americas with the most
comprehensive reformulation schedules – Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the NSRI. Food
category definitions are taken from the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS)
of the Customs Tariff. Where HS codes do not apply, or if preferred, the category definitions
established by countries can be used.
Maximum value – the upper limit for salt/sodium concentration for a food category or product
accepted by public health authorities and food companies to be technologically feasible and
acceptable to consumers, yet sufficient to achieve a public health impact
Regional target for salt/sodium concentration – the highest value for salt/sodium concentration
per 100g of food product taken from the range of existing maximum values/upper limits per food
category set by countries in the Americas. Where the regional target for a food category has already
been met, the lower value in the range of existing maximum targets should become the
reformulation target.
Background
The first Consortium meeting was held in 2012 where members agreed to several main lines of
work. At a second meeting, members accepted a Five-year Strategic Plan (2013 to 2018). Of the five
objectives in the Plan, they chose to begin with two: social marketing and harmonization of targets.
A sub-group of members agreed to work on each of the objectives. Also during the second meeting,
members drafted a creative brief for a social marketing campaign.
With 12 countries in the Region having initiatives to reduce the overconsumption of salt, and
expecting the number to grow, given that salt intake reduction is among the WHO global indicators
key to reducing NCDs, it is timely for the Consortium to address target harmonization. The intention
is to support the harmonization of targets for food groups common to multiple countries, leveraging
on existing national targets in order to support the broader application of such targets throughout
the region. Achieving this objective will benefit both national public nutrition initiatives and the food
21
industry: countries that intend to set targets for reformulations, but may not have the resources to
do so individually, can take advantage of the investments made and lessons learned by others to
establish targets and timelines; and food companies can migrate to harmonized formulations for
same-products supplied to markets in the Region.
PAHO TAG has prepared a Guide to assist countries in setting their own targets.1 For countries that
lack the capacity to do so and to advance the Consortium’s objective on harmonization in the
Region, TAG has compiled the targets and timelines for nine food categories common in five
countries – Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the NSRI. In these countries, food categories for
reformulation and targets were agreed upon through negotiations between public health
authorities and the food industry, with assistance from independent food technology experts, and in
some cases inputs of consumers.2
What are most feasible to transfer from the five countries above to those that intend to have
reformulations are the targets that are maximum salt/sodium concentrations per 100g of food
product. Targets based on maxima are not only a straightforward concept for the food industry and
consumers, the process of deriving and re-deriving the targets and ongoing monitoring, given the
downward shift expected in maxima as reformulations proceed, is more feasible using maxima than
averages or sales-weighted averages.
The identification of key food categories and corresponding regional targets for them, however,
does not preclude countries from deriving sales weighted averages or averages as additional targets
for the salt/sodium content of foods nor from setting targets for other food categories or
establishing more stringent national targets, either voluntary or mandatory. Regional targets
nevertheless will support expansion and consistency of salt/sodium reduction efforts into a broader
number of countries, leveraging multisectoral efforts in this area.
The process below is proposed to advance the agreeing upon regional targets for key food
categories. For each step and its outcomes, there are roles and contributions for each of the sectors
represented in the Consortium – countries, the food industry, civil society, TAG and PAFNCDs.
1 Guide for setting targets and timelines to reduce the salt content of food, 2013,
http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=21493&Itemid=
2 Targets and timelines for food categories in common in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the
National Salt Reduction Initiative in the United States,
http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=25647+&Itemid=99
9999&lang=pt
22
Proposed process to agree upon, maintain and monitor regional targets
Codes of conduct on transparency, full disclosures and declarations of conflicts of interest will be
applied as needed.
Step Outcomes
Roles and contributions
1) Confirm the
role of regional
targets in target
harmonization in
the Region
Consortium consensus on principles to guide
agreement on and dissemination, maintenance
and monitoring of regional targets
All Consortium members agree to the Consensus Statement
2) Agree upon
regional targets
A harmonized maximum value for salt/sodium
concentration per key food category or food
product as mg Na per 100g for a given year
Plan for progressively lower regional targets for
the salt/sodium concentration of common staple
foods
All Consortium members:
• confirm the key food categories/ products
• confirm the maximum target per key food
category/product
• identify a schedule for revisiting the regional targets
• identify options for monitoring adherence to the
established targets
3) Promote and
disseminate
regional targets
Consortium members endorse the regional targets
as a means to advance harmonization and
participate in encouraging uptake by food
companies supplying key products in the Region,
particularly in markets without national targets
Civil society entities endorse the regional targets
and participate in their promotion and monitoring
PAFNCD circulates the regional targets
PAFNCD/PAHO/TAG support countries to build capacities
necessary to set regional targets
4) Demonstrate
and report on
progress towards
meeting the
targets
Publication of food industry pledges to the targets
Up-to-date food composition databases
Verified label data
MONITORING
Options for data collection
• industry voluntarily and regularly provides food
composition data on products in the key categories to
an independent institution
• industry voluntarily and regularly provides label data
on products in the key categories to an independent
institution
23
Public awareness of food company performance
• an independent institution collects product samples
and label data
• civil society entities collect label data
EVALUATION
Options for verification of label data
• an independent entity chemically analyzes a sub-set of
products for label accuracy
• civil society entities monitor accuracy of label data
REPORTING ON ADHERENCE TO TARGETS
• PAFNCD using results of data analyses reports
publically on adherence
• Civil society entities report publically on adherence
Assumptions
• composition data supplied and / or label data collected
• an independent entity conducts chemical and / or label analysis
• ongoing collection of maximum values per food categories / products
• as maxima adjust downwards, regional targets adjusted accordingly
• capacities and resources for the initiative maintained
24
APPENDIX 2: List of Participants at the Third Meeting of the SaltSmart Consortium
28-29 October 2014
WHO/PAHO Office in Brasilia, Brazil
Lorena Andrea Allemandi
Director
Area of Healthy Nutrition Policy
Inter-American Heart Foundation, Argentina
(FIC Argentina)
Scalabrini Ortiz 2470 4 H
1425 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires
Telephone: 54-11-4831-2238
Email: [email protected]
Norm Campbell MD FRCPC
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
University of Calgary
3280 Hospital Drive NW
Calgary Alberta
T2N 4Z6
Telephone: 403-210-7961
Email: [email protected]
Abraham Miranda,
Health Attache
Embassy of USA
Telephone: 55 61 3312 7697
Cellphone: 55 61 8224 8700
Email:[email protected]
Trevor Hassell
Chair, National Barbados NCD Committee
Cnr River Road & Spruce Street,
St. Michael, Barbados, BB11155
Telephone: 246 435 7486
Email: [email protected]
Diego Hekimian
Vice President
Department of Institutional Affairs COPAL
Alianza Latinoamericana de Asociaciones de la
Industria de Alimentos y Bebidas (ALAIAB)
Telephone: 54 5533 5000 int 5197
Email: [email protected]
Maisha Hutton
Executive Director
Healthy Caribbean Coalition
Email: [email protected]
Patricia Jaime
Coordinator of Food and Nutrition
Ministry of Health, Brazil
Email: [email protected]
Luisa Kipreos
Department of Eating and Nutrition
Chilean Ministry of Health
Telephone: 2 25740474 -2 25740493
Email: [email protected]
Mary R. L'Abbe
Earle W. McHenry Professor and
Chair, Department of Nutritional Sciences,
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
FitzGerald Building, 150 College St, Rm 315
Toronto, ON Canada M5S 3E2
Telephone: 416-978-7235
Cellphone: 416-605-1902
Email: [email protected]
Hubert Linders
Project Coordinator, fundraising officer
Consumers International
The Global Campaigning Voice for Consumers
Juan Antonio Ríos 58, 7th floor
Santiago, Chile
Telephone:56 2 2632 2084
Cellphone:56 2 9101 5522
Email: [email protected]
Diana Vaca Mcghie
Global Strategies & Programs
American Heart Association
25
1150 Connecticut Avenue, Suite 300
Washington D.C. 20036
Telephone: 202-785-7917
Cellphone: 202-230-9074
Email: [email protected]
Adriana Blanco-Metzler
Researcher, Instituto Costarricense de
investigación
y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud
INCIENSA
Tres Rios, San José, Costa Rica
Email: [email protected]
Claudia Patricia Moreno Barrera
Promoting an Prevention Department
Ministry of Health and Social Protection
Colombia
Telephone: 3305000 ext 1246
Email: [email protected]
Eduardo Augusto Fernandes Nilson
Vice coordinator of Food and Nutrition
Ministry of Health
Email: [email protected]
Susana Sanchez
Directora de Nutrición y Programas
Alimentarios
Instituto Nacional de Alimentación y Nutrición
Telephone: 595 21-294073
Cellphone: 595 981-249685
Email: [email protected]
Juliana Faria
R & D Manager
Grupo Bimbo
Rua Errico Verissimo, 342
Sau Paulo/05560-900
Brasil
Telephone: 55 11 21 77 9195
Email: [email protected]
Maria Rosa Rabanal
Scientific, Regulatory Affairs and Nutrition
Manager for Southern Cone and H&W LA
Mondelez
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Email: [email protected]
Elizabeth Vargas
Nutrition and Health Regional Leader - Latin
America
Unilever Brasil
Itaim Bibi | São Paulo | 04543-011
Av. Pres. Juscelino Kubitschek, 1309
Telephone: +55 11 3568 8321
Cellphone: +55 11 98927-7756
Email: [email protected]
ABIA Brazil representatives:
Daniella Cunha (Director of Institutional
Relationships)
Edmund Klotz (President)
Ignez Novaes de Goes (Technical Manager)
SECRETARIAT:
Branka Legetic
PAHO-WHO Regional Advisor & Unit Chief
Noncommunicable Diseases and Disabilities
Department of Noncommunicable Diseases and
Mental Health
Telephone: 202 974 3892
Cellphone: 202-316-6459
Email:[email protected]
Barbara Legowski
Temporary Advisor
17 Loch Isle Road
Ottawa, ON K2H 8G5, Canada
Telephone: 613 726 2625
Email: [email protected]
Silva, Dra. Ana Carolina Feldenheimer
Advisor in Nutrition issues
PAHO office Brazil
Email:[email protected]
Zohra Abaakouk
Coordinator
26
Social Determinants of Health, Health Risks,
NCDs & Mental Health
PAHO office Brazil
Email: [email protected]
27
APPENDIX 3: Meeting Agenda
SALTSMART CONSORTIUM
The Multi-stakeholders Committed to Reducing the Overconsumption of Dietary Salt in the Americas
28-29 October 2014, WHO/PAHO Office, Brasilia, Brazil
Acknowledging progress with dietary salt reduction in the Region
Advancing harmonization – agreeing on regional targets for the salt/sodium content
in key food categories
Background
As of December 2013, 11 countries in the Pan American Region have formal national initiatives to
reduce the overconsumption of salt – Argentina, Barbados, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Columbia, Costa Rica,
Ecuador, Mexico, Paraguay and Uruguay – plus in the United States, the National Salt Reduction
Initiative (NSRI) is an entity outside the national government. Eight have targets and timelines for
sodium in specified food categories: Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the NSRI have exclusively voluntary
targets; Argentina, Chile and Ecuador have both voluntary and regulated components to their
approaches (the regulations require warning labels on packaged products that exceed upper limits for
critical nutrients including sodium); and Paraguay has regulated the salt content of bread. Given that salt
intake reduction is among the WHO global targets key to reducing NCDs, national initiatives to reduce
the overconsumption of salt are expected to grow.
The SaltSmart Consortium in its Strategic Plan 2013-18 agreed to advance the harmonization of targets
and timelines for reducing salt/sodium content within common food groups; and to promote and
implement reformulation actions to reduce salt/sodium in a group of agreed-upon products, leveraging
existing national and industry efforts. A sub-group of Consortium members that agreed to work on this
objective is now proposing a process to this end. Harmonization will benefit both the food industry and
national public nutrition initiatives: food companies and particularly multinationals can migrate to
standard formulations for same-products supplied to markets in the Region; and countries that intend
to set targets for reformulations can take advantage of the investments made by others to establish
targets and timelines.
In five countries – Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile and the NSRI in the US – targets and timelines for
reformulation were derived through negotiations with the food industry and with assessments by
independent food technology experts, and in some cases consumers. The proposal to harmonize targets
is referring to the targets set in these five countries as they demonstrate that the scheduled
reformulations are feasible and acceptable.
28
This Meeting
With this meeting, the Consortium will agree on principles as well as propose maximum values for
regional targets and the process to disseminate them, and monitor adherence to them. The basis for
discussions is the Concept Note on agreeing on regional targets for salt/sodium concentration in key
food categories in the Americas.
The meeting is also an opportunity to highlight other advances in the Region addressing dietary salt
reduction.
Objectives for Day 1: Updates and highlights; introduction to harmonization – consensus on regional
targets
1. Updates and highlights from Brazil
2. Other country updates
3. Food industry and trade association updates; September 2014 IFBA commitments – impacts in the
Americas region
4. Civil society updates
5. Consortium consensus on basis for regional targets
Objectives for Day 2: Agreeing on regional targets; outlining a process to disseminate targets and
monitor adherence
1. Identification of roles and contributions of Consortium members in adopting, disseminating and
monitoring regional targets, and how to support country capacity building to adopt or set targets
2. Next steps
AGENDA
Tuesday 28 October
8:15-8:45 REGISTRATION
8:45-9:00
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS
Brazil MOH
PWR, WHO/PAHO representative to Brazil
9:00-9:15
AGENDA
• Review of objectives and agenda
• Introduction of participants
29
Branka Legetic, WHO/PAHO
9:15-10:00
10:00-10:15
BRAZIL HIGHLIGHTS
• New Food Guide
Patricia Jaime, Brazil MOH
• National plan addressing noncommunicable diseases
Deborah Malta, Brazil MOH
• Progress on food reformulations and monitoring of results
Eduardo Nilson, Brazil MOH
• Q&A
10:15-10:45 BREAK
10:45-11:15
11:15-11:45
11:45-12:15
12:15-12:45
PROGRESS ON TARGETS AND OTHER INITIATIVES
� Country panel – Barbados, Canada, Costa Rica
� Civil society panel – Consumers International, Healthy Caribbean Coalition,
American Heart Association
� Industry and trade associations panel September 2014 IFBA commitments –
Mondelez, ALAIAB, UNILEVER
� Q&A
12:45-2:00 LUNCH
2:00-2:40
2:40-3:10
ADVANCING HARMONIZATION WITH REGIONAL TARGETS
� Presenting the Concept
Norman Campbell, Co-chair TAG and Mary L’Abbé, TAG
• Discussion
Rosa Maria Rabanal, Mondelez, moderator
3:10-3:40 BREAK
30
3:40-3:50
3:50-4:30
CONSENSUS ON PRINCIPLES
� Presentation of the Consensus Statement
Branka Legetic, WHO/PAHO
� Discussion and agreement on the Consensus Statement
Diana Vaca McGhie, AHA, moderator
4:30 ADJOURN
Wednesday 29 October
8:30-8:45 WELCOME BACK
� Review of Day 1, objectives for Day 2
Branka Legetic, WHO/PAHO
8:45-9:15
9:15-10:30
PROPOSED REGIONAL TARGETS
� Presentation of regional targets for key food categories
Mary L’Abbé, TAG
� Break out groups
10:30-11:00 BREAK
11:00-12:30 � Plenary - groups report back
Adriana Blanco, Costa Rica, moderator
� Agreement on regional targets
12:30-2:00 LUNCH
2:00-2:15
ROLES AND CONTRIBUTIONS IN TARGET DISSEMINATION, MAINTENANCE AND
MONITORING
� Presentation of elements in dissemination and maintenance of regional targets
and monitoring of adherence to targets
Eduardo Nilson, Brazil MOH
� Break out groups