Upload
palila
View
39
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Salinity retrieval with scale model antenna pattern. S. Kim/F. Wentz Aquarius Workshop (GSFC) 2008.03. Tb2 retrieval accuracy: scale model (ascending). Simple Faraday correction & before additional correction TB2/2 in Kelvin 2001 Solar flux 2003 day 303 (IRI 2001 TEC) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Salinity retrieval with scale model antenna
pattern
S. Kim/F. WentzAquarius Workshop (GSFC)
2008.03
Tb2 retrieval accuracy: scale model (ascending)
Simple Faraday correction & before additional correction
TB2/2 in Kelvin
2001 Solar flux
2003 day 303 (IRI 2001 TEC)
error reaches +/- 3-4K
After
Faraday angle
Tb2 retrieval scale-model (descending)
Before additional correctionerror reaches -2K
After
Faraday angle
Scale model Tb1 retrieval accuracy (ascending)
Before additional Faraday correction
After
Scale model Tb1: descending
Before additional correction
After
Tb2 (with scale model) & Faraday rotation
Tb2 is strongly related to Faraday rotation(theoretical model Tb2 is offset by 1.5K; simple correction: T2 = (T22+T32))
Ascending horn 1 descending
K
latitude latitude
Faraday angleFaraday off
Simple correction
Faraday OnSimple correction
Theoretical model
Faraday offSimple correction
Faraday OnSimple correction
Scale model
Scale model antenna Stokes matrix (modified)
*2 2 *
2 2 * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
*
Im
Re Im
2Re Re Re Im Im
2Im 2Im Im Im Re R
Re
2Re
e
vv vh vv vh
a
hv hh hv hh hv hha
a vv hv vv hh vh hv vv hh vh hv
a
vv hv vh hh vv hh vh hv vv hh v
vv vh
vh
h
hh
g g g gV
g g g g g gH
U g g g g g g g g g gW
g g g g g g g g
g g
g g
g g g
*
R
R
R
R
hv
V
H
U
Wg
scale model antenna’s off-diagonal term is 10-40 times larger than theoretical’s
theoretical antennaIHORN = 1
0.9777995 0.0222005 0.0018323 0.0000360
0.0236619 0.9763381 -0.0016604 -0.0001937
-0.0012777 0.0011429 0.9584791 0.0017800
-0.0003209 -0.0001290 0.0001374 0.9443555
IHORN = 2
0.9698600 0.0301399 -0.0027432 -0.0008946
0.0281496 0.9718504 0.0045488 -0.0004253
-0.0016207 0.0014077 0.9382428 0.0007672
0.0001413 -0.0006906 -0.0013847 0.9365401
IHORN = 3
0.9659594 0.0340406 0.0014531 0.0007880
0.0334903 0.9665097 -0.0021459 -0.0001634
-0.0014786 0.0013045 0.9091309 -0.0004642
0.0000453 0.0003553 -0.0006897 0.9228344
scale model antennaHORN= 1(n1)
0.9853075 0.0168026 -0.0195433 -0.0085144
0.0154680 0.9870461 0.0065521 0.0043823
-0.0018744 -0.0224793 0.9034507 -0.2914306
0.0063599 -0.0261359 0.2846981 0.9142451
HORN= 2(p0)
0.9793472 0.0251813 -0.0082843 -0.0003378
0.0222499 0.9820560 -0.0088156 -0.0069168
0.0027088 -0.0392866 0.9340240 0.0511001
-0.0127451 0.0026349 -0.0496169 0.9496149
HORN= 3(p1)
0.9736289 0.0336871 -0.0206253 -0.0046420
0.0273845 0.9800099 0.0076234 0.0009958
0.0049451 -0.0272600 0.8377592 -0.3615281
0.0066785 -0.0258146 0.3477410 0.8623706
Scale model antenna Stokes matrix (classical)
2 2 2 2 * *12
2 2 2 2 * *12
2 2 2 212
12 2 2 21
22
*3
4
* *
*
*
*
Re
Re
Re
I
Im
e
m
R
vv vh hv hh vv vh hh hvvv vh h
vv vh
v
vv vh hv hh vv vh hh
v vh hh hv
hh v
v hh
A
vv vh hv hhA
Avv hv
hh
v
h
h
v h
A
v
g g g g g g g g g
g g g g
g g gT
g g g g
g
g g
g g g
g g
g g gT
T g
g g
g gT
g
* *
* * * *
1
2
*
*
* * *
* * 3
4
* Im
Im Im Im
Re
Re
aa bb ab ba
vv hv
BR
B
hh vh vv hv hh vh vv hh vh hv
R
BRv hv vv hh vh
aa bb ab ba
hv
BR
hh vh g g g g
g g g g g g g g g
T
g g g g g
T
Tg g g gT
g g
g
g
g
theoretical antennaIHORN = 1 1.0000000 0.0000000 0.0001719 0.0002297 0.0000000 0.9541376 0.0034927 0.0002297 -0.0000674 -0.0012103 0.9584791
0.0002297 -0.0000960 -0.0002249 0.0001374
0.9443555
IHORN = 2 0.9999999 -0.0000000 0.0018056 -0.0004693 -0.0000000 0.9417105 -0.0072920 -
0.0004693 -0.0001065 -0.0015142 0.9382428 -
0.0004693 0.0004160 -0.0002746 -0.0013847
0.9365401 IHORN = 3 1.0000000 0.0000000 -0.0006928 0.0009514 0.0000000 0.9324691 0.0035990 0.0009514 -0.0000870 -0.0013916 0.9091309
0.0009514 -0.0001550 0.0002003 -0.0006897
0.9228344
scale model antennaHORN= 1(n1)
1.0023122 -0.0002020 -0.0129912 -0.0128967 -0.0002020 0.9700415 -0.0260954 -
0.0128967 -0.0121768 0.0103024 0.9034507 -
0.0128967 0.0162479 -0.0098880 0.2846981 0.9142451 HORN= 2(p0)
1.0044172 0.0001113 -0.0170999 0.0065790 0.0001113 0.9569861 0.0005313 0.0065790 -0.0182889 0.0209977 0.9340240 0.0065790 -0.0076900 -0.0050551 0.0496169
0.9496149 HORN= 3(p1)
1.0073552 -0.0000392 -0.0130019 -0.0056378 -0.0000392 0.9462836 -0.0282487 -
0.0056378 -0.0111575 0.0161026 0.8377592 -
0.0056378 0.0162465 -0.0095681 0.3477410 0.8623706
Errors in Faraday correction
2 21 1 2 2 3 2 & A B A toa A A BT T T T T T
For uniform gain, no coupling, simple Faraday correction gives:
The simple correction would produce
TBtoa
TBR
TA
ionosphere
atmosphere
TAtoa
T’B
* *2,2 vv vh hh hv
1, 1, 21,
Re(g g + )1 sin(2 )B toa
A toa B toa fB toa
Tg gT G T
G T
24 2 2 * * * *
2, 2, vv hv vh hh 1, 2, vv hv vh hh 1,
2* * * *
1, 1,2 vv hv vh hh v h h v2, 2 2
2, 2,
2 Re(g g + ) sin(2 ) Re(g g + )
Re(g g + ) Re(G g + )1 2 sin(2 )
A toa B toa B toa B toa f B toa
B toa B toaB toa f
B toa B toa
T G T G g g T T g g T
T Tg g G gG T
G T G T
With coupling ( based on Le Vine et al 07)
* *
* *vv vh hh hv 2,
* *vv h
21, 1,
2 22, 2,
2 2
vv hv vh hh
v vh
2,
* *v
2,
v hv vh hhhh 1,3,
Re(g g )sin(2 )
Re(g g
Re(g g + )sin(2 )
R
(
)e(g g + )
G -g )cos(2 )
(
cos(
G -g )cos(2 )
2
A toa B toa
A toa f B toa
f B
f B toa
B toa
toa
f B toa
A toa
g g T
T gG T
T T
T
g T
g g T g gT
* *
vv hv vh
2 22,
2 2
2,
21 ,hh ,Re(g g
) +(G -g )sin(2 )
+(G -g )sin )+ ) (2
f Bf B to
B toa
toa
f B toa
a
g
T
Tg T
T
Additional Faraday correction
2,1,
1,
'1, s1 in(2 )B toa
fB toa
B toa B toaT TT
T
12, 2
,
2,
', 21 2 si ( n )B toa
B toaf
BB a
toatoT
T
TT
constant value for Tb1/Tb2 [10,7,4] for horn1,2,3
f (Faraday angle) is estimate as 0.5*atan(Ta3/Ta2)
No exact way to deconvolve the Faraday effect because of 4pi integration The additional correction is applied after APC (antenna pattern correction, A-matrix approach)
* *vv vh hh hv=Re(g g + )=[-0.013, -0.017, -0.013]g g
* *vv hv vh hh=Re(g g + )=[-0.013, -0.019, -0.012]g g
Performance of additional correction for Tb2
Faraday off
Faraday OnSimple correction
Faraday On
Additional Correction
Land fraction
Performance of additional correction for Tb1
Faraday off
Faraday OnSimple correction
Faraday On
Additional Correction
Land fraction
salinity retrieval accuracy: after additional correction
Ascending
Descending
salinity retrieval: scale model Scale model retrieval meets the SSS retrieval requirement
Optimal case (SST > 10C), land fraction < 1e-3, but with the strongest Faraday rotation effect of a year and the strong solar effect
With theoretical antenna pattern
With scale model antenna pattern
∆SSS (9sec) mean std dev
Inner horn -0.006 0.14
Middle horn -0.013 0.13
Outer horn -0.017 0.12
∆SSS(psu,6sec)
mean std dev
Inner horn -0.005 0.23
Middle horn 0.054 0.21
Outer horn 0.019 0.21
salinity retrieval: scale model All SST and land fraction < 1e-3
With theoretical antenna pattern
With scale model antenna pattern
∆SSS(psu) Mean std dev
Inner horn 0.013 0.44
Middle horn -0.032 0.44
Outer horn 0.052 0.41
∆SSS mean std dev
Inner horn -0.007 0.28
Middle horn -0.010 0.27
Outer horn -0.016 0.26
Practical considerations
We don’t know antenna pattern & Faraday angle But these may be estimated
By trial and error, determine Re(Gg*)/G2
[-0.014, -0.018, -0.012] empirical [-0.013, -0.019, -0.012] from scale-model pattern
Faraday angle: 0.5atan(ta3/ta2) Truth Faraday angle (forward simulation) works slightly better than 0.5atan()
Nominal values of Tb1, Tb2 are ok
Summary
Simulation of salinity retrieval is performed using the scale model antenna pattern Simple correction of the Faraday effect is not sufficient, leaving up to 3-4K error in TB2 retrieval (in worst-case Faraday condition) Additional Faraday correction is implemented Now TB1 and TB2 may be retrieved with less than 0.15K error; salinity may be retrieved with an accuracy better than 0.2psu.