Upload
vanessa-lucas
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S. Chelkowski Slide 1ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009
Overview
Introduction ET
Sagnac topology
Sagnac effect
Consequences for ET with Sagnac topology Static effects
Noise couplings Frequency noise
Seismic noise
Beam jitter noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 2
ET
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 3
ET
Triangular geometry Topology currently
undefined Michelson,Mach-
Zehnder, Sagnac, etc
Configuration currently undefined
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 4
Sagnac topology
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 5
Non-zero area Sagnac Near-zero area Sagnac
Sagnac interferometer and effect
Named after Georges Sagnac Correctly explained only with
General Relativity Rotational induced phase shift
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 6
Original experimental setup from 1913
Ref:[1] G. B. Malykin, "The Sagnac effect: correct and incorrect explanations", Physics-Uspekhi, Vol.43, (2000), 1229-1252
[2] G. E. Stedman, "Ring-laser tests of fundamental physics and geophysics", Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol.60, (1997), 615-688
Location dependency
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 7
Earth rotation
Detector location
Equator
Sagnac effect today
Lasergyroscopes are used for geodesic measurements to determine variations in the Earth rotation rate
Also used to do seismometry
Current sensitivity:
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 8
Images with courtesy Laser Gyro Group Wettzell, Germany
Sagnac effect in ET
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 9
Non-zero area Sagnac Near-zero area Sagnac
A A = B - C
B
C
Sagnac effect in ET
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 10
Analysis involves two effects1.Static effects due to Earth’s rotation
Much more sensitive than current Laser gyros
2.Noise couplings• Frequency noise• Seismic noise• Beam jitter noise
Static Sagnac effect
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 11
Location Strasbourg:
Arm length of 10km
Sim
ula
tion
para
mete
rs
No longer on dark fringe!33% of laser power lost in “dark” port
10km
A = B - C
B
C
Change arm length to 10068m to achieve dark port condition again!
Include Matlab figure which Shows the fringes?
Noise coupling analysis
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 12
Our aim is
@ 10Hz
Hild et al., (2008) arXiv:0810.0604v2
How does strain sensitivity translates into Sagnac phase shift?
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 13
Clockwise propagating beam:
Counter-clockwise propagating beam
10km
Noise couplings – Frequency noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 14
Non-zero area Sagnac
Noise couplings – Frequency noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 15
A = B - C
B
C
Near-zero area Sagnac
Noise couplings – Seismic noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 16
10km
Non-zero area Sagnac
Noise couplings – Seismic noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 17
A = B - C
B
C
Near-zero area Sagnac
Noise couplings – Beam jitter noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 18
Noise couplings – Beam jitter noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 19
10km
Non-zero area Sagnac
Noise couplings – Beam jitter noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 20
Noise couplings – Beam jitter noise
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 21
A = B - C
B
C
Near-zero area Sagnac
Conclusion
Two possible solutions for ET with Sagnac topology Non-zero area Sagnac Near Zero area Sagnac
Noise coupling analysis performed for both cases Near-zero area Sagnac performs better! Seismic noise and frequency noise coupling are fine Only beam alignment has stringent requirement
S. Chelkowski ET Meeting, Hannover 01/2009 Slide 22