122
I INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOMENT PROPOSAL UNDER RASHTREEYA UCHCHATARA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN SCHEME OF MHRD SUBMITTED TO KARNATAKA STATE HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL INSTITUTION OF PRINTING TECHNOLOGY BUILDING FIRST FLOOR, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560001 KARNATAKA SUBMITTED BY GOVT. FIRST GRADE COLLEGE BIDAR NAUBAD, BIDAR-585402 KARNATAKA I

RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

rusa

Citation preview

Page 1: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

I

INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOMENT PROPOSAL

UNDER

RASHTREEYA UCHCHATARA SHIKSHA ABHIYAN SCHEME OF MHRD

SUBMITTED TO

KARNATAKA STATE HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL

INSTITUTION OF PRINTING TECHNOLOGY BUILDINGFIRST FLOOR, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE-560001

KARNATAKA

SUBMITTED BY

GOVT. FIRST GRADE COLLEGE BIDARNAUBAD, BIDAR-585402

KARNATAKA

Phone Number: Mobile Number: E-Mail ID: 08482-232020 . +919538257654. [email protected]

Fax Number: Website URL: I

Page 2: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

08482- 232020

II

Page 3: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

I

Govt. of KarnatakaDepartment of Collegiate Education

GOVERNMENT FIRSTGRADE COLLEGE, BIDARNAUBAD, BIDAR-585402

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that all the information provided in

this Institutional Development Proposal (IDP) for RUSA

submitted to the Karnataka State Higher Educational

Council through the Department of Collegiate Education,

Karnataka is factually correct.

Principal

I

Page 4: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Sl. No Contents Page No.

II

Page 5: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

I Certificate III College Profile IIIII Institutional Vision IIIIV Institutional Mission IIIV Objective III

1 Institutional Basic Information 11.1 Institutional Identity 11.2 Academic Information 21.3 Faculty Status 31.4 Baseline Data 42 Institutional Development Proposal 5

2.1 Executive Summary of the IDP 52.2 Details of SWOT Analysis Carried Out 7

A Methodology Used 7B SWOT Analysis Summary 10C Strategic Plan Based on SWOT Analysis 14

2.3 Objective & Expected results based on SWOT Analysis 162.4 Action Plan For 17

A Improving Employability of Graduates 17B Increased Learning Outcomes of the students 19C Obtaining Autonomous Institution status within two Years 21

D

Achieving the targets of 60% of the eligible UG and PG programs accredited within two years of joining the project and 100% accreditation obtained applied for by the end of the Project of the eligible UG and PG Programs

22

E Implementation of academic and nonacademic reforms (details given in RUSA Document) 23

F Interaction with industry in order to promote 23G Enhancement of Research &Consultancy Activities 24

2.5 H

Provide an action plan for organizing a Finishing School and for improving the academic performance of SC/ST/OBC/ academically weak students through innovative methods, such as remedial and skill development classes for increasing the transition rate and pass rate with the objective of improving their employability

25

2.6 Action Plan for strengthening UG & PG Programmes 262.7 Training Need Analysis details for the Faculty members 272.8 Training Need Analysis for technical and other staffs 302.9 Relevance and Coherence of Institutional Development Proposal 312.10 Department / Faculty participation in the proposal preparation 322.11 Institutional Project Implementation Arrangements 332.12 Institutional Project Budget 35

III

Page 6: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.13 Targets against the deliverables 362.14 Project Targets for Institutional Development Proposal 38

2.15 Action Plan for Ensuring that the project activities would be sustained after the end of the project 39

ANNEXURE1 Building Plan 412 NAAC Certificate 443 Staff Details 464 Student Strength 555 Approval Copy 566 Initially Sanctioned Posts in the Year 1974 587 Inclusion of college under Section 12-B of UGC Act, 1956 598 Inclusion of college under 2(f) of UGC Act, 1956 609 Affiliation copies UG & PG 6110 Student opinion about college 6911 Student Appraisal of Teacher 7012 Edusat Attendance 7113 Facilities available in Department of Computer Science 7214 Facilities available in Department of Electronics 7315 Facilities available in Department of Chemistry 7416 Facilities available in Department of Zoology 7517 Facilities available in Department of Botany 7518 List of Ph.D. holders 7619 List of Teachers who are pursuing Ph.D. 76

IV

Page 7: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

College Profile

Govt. First Grade College, BIDAR is a College set-up by the Department of Collegiate Education,

Govt. of Karnataka, in the year 1974, to uplift the backward students of Bidar district by providing

them the facilities for higher education.

Bidar is a historical city which was once ruled by the kings of Mouryas Shatavahanas, Rastra kutas,

Chalukyas and the dynasties like Bahamanis, Barred Shahis, Moghals and the Nizams of Hyderabad.

'Madarsa' built by the Prime Minister of Bahamani Mohammed Shah Gawan in 1472 used to attract

students from abroad.

In 1974, the College was started with Arts Faculty. The Commerce and Science Faculties were

added in 1982 and 1992 respectively.

The College is affiliated to Gulbarga University, Karnataka and is recognized by the UGC under 2(f)

and 12(B). As the College has been granted permanent affiliation from 2003-04.

The College is running Undergraduate Programmes in the Faculties of Arts, Commerce and

Science. In the Faculty of Arts, it has 10 Departments (Kannada, Hindi, English, Urdu, Arabic,

History, Political Science, Economics, Sociology and Education) and in the Faculty of Science, it

has 7 Departments (Physics, Electronics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Chemistry, Botany and

Zoology).

The College is also running Three Postgraduate Programmes in Arts Faculties ( Kannada, History

and Economics), Two Postgraduate Programs in Science Faculties ( Computer Science &

Chemistry) and One Postgraduate Programme in Commerce Faculty.

It has on its roll 763 students in UG Programme and 180 students in PG Programme.

The College has a teaching Faculty of 75 (28 permanent and 47 part-time teachers) and a non-

teaching staff of 12. The Faculty is recruited by the State Government.

The Support Services available in the College are: Central Library, Sports facilities and Hostel run

by the Dept. of Social Welfare and Backward Classes.

V

Page 8: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Institutional Vision

Pursuit excellence in higher education to make our students focus on the development of

physical, Intellectual, Scientific, and social potential to foster global competencies  to inculcate the

qualities of human values and to be non-violent and have secular thoughts to build a tolerance

society and build strong nation.

Institutional Mission

To impart quality education to meet the needs of the present emerging society

To strengthen the inner potential of the students through spiritual values

To maintain a cordial relationship with the employees, alumni and the society

To create awareness of gender equity and social justice

To equip students with relevant knowledge, competence and creativity to face global

challenges.

To facilitate optimum use of human and natural resources for sustainable development.

To empower students through inclusive growth

VALUES: Activities of the College will be Impartial, Transparent, Ethical, and ensuring Equity and

Excellence.

Objectives:

The general objectives are aligned with the institutional vision and mission. The proposal pursues a

strategic planning for institutional development, keeping the design of results of SWOT analysis in

view. The comprehensive objective of the institute which completed its 40th year since inception is “to

develop the college from emergent stage to a hub of excellence with societal commitment and

international visibility”. As such, the general objectives are arrived at from various perspectives.

1. Improve Employability and Learning Outcomes of Students

2. Enhance Industry- Institute and Society-Institute Interactions

3. Augment R&D and Consultancy Services

4. Empower and Motivate Employees for Improved Performance

5. Expand Teaching-Learning Facilities

6. Implement Institutional Reforms

VI

Page 9: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1. INSTITUTIONAL BASIC INFORMATION

1.1 Institutional Identity:

Name of the Institution : Govt. First Grade College, Bidar, Dist: Bidar.

Is the Institution approved by regulatory body? : Yes

Furnish approval no : ORDER NO. ED 20 UGC 74 Bangalore Dated 27th August 1974

Type of Institution : Government Funded ,

Status of Institution : Affiliated to Gulbarga University, Gulbarga.

Name of Head of Institution and Project Nodal Officers:

Head and NodalOfficer

Name PhoneNumber

MobileNumber

FaxNumber

E-mailAddress

Head of the Institution Shivaraj M. Devappa08482-232020

9538257654 08482-232020 [email protected]

RUSA Institutionalcoordinator Ravindrakumar

08482-232020

9972684489 08482-232020 [email protected]

Nodal Officers for:

Academic Activities Dhanraj Biradar08482-232020

9448715811 08482-232020 [email protected]

Civil Works includingEnvironment Management

Gadde Dileep08482-232020

9740307943 08482-232020 [email protected]

Procurement Alka D. Solankar08482-232020

9480357960 08482-232020 [email protected]

Financial aspects Savale Tukaram08482-232020

9449171583 08482-232020 [email protected]

Equity Assurance PlanImplementation

Dr. Girija. G. Mangalgatti

08482-232020

9739475850 08482-232020 [email protected]

1

Page 10: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1.2 Academic Information:

UG/PG/PhD programs offered in Academic year 2012-13

Sl. No.Title of

programsLevel

(UG/PG/PhD)Duration (years)

Year of starting

Sanctioned annual Intake

Total student strength

1 B.A. UG 03 1974 720 3182 B.Com UG 03 1984 180 2043 BBM UG 03 2006 90 594 B. Sc UG 03 1992 360 1845 MA History PG 02 2006 60 626 MA Kannada PG 02 2012 30 277 MA Economics PG 02 2012 30 248 M.Com PG 02 2012 30 319 M.Sc Comp. Sc PG 02 2012 30 1810 M.Sc

ChemistryPG 02 2012 15 18

Whether Institution is Accredited? Yes Grade: B (Score 70.2) When: 2004

Accreditation Status of UG programs:Title of UG

programs being offered

Whether eligible for accreditation or not?

Whether accredited as on 31st March

2013

Whether “Applied for” as on 31st March

2013B.A. Yes No NoB.Com Yes No NoBBM Yes No NoB.Sc Yes No No

Accreditation Status of PG programs:

Title of PG programs being

offered

Whether eligible for accreditation or not?

Whether accredited as on 31st March

2012

Whether “Applied for” as on 31st March

2012MA History Yes No NoMA Kannada Yes No NoMA Economics Yes No NoM.Com Yes No NoM.Sc Comp. Sc Yes No NoM.Sc Chemistry Yes No No

2

Page 11: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1.3 Faculty Status (Regular/On-Contract Faculty as on March 31st 2013

Facu

lty R

ank

No.

of S

anct

ione

d R

egul

ar P

osts

Present Status: Number in Position by Highest Qualification

Tot

al N

umbe

r of

re

gula

r fa

culty

Tot

al V

acan

cies

Tot

al N

umbe

r of

co

ntra

ct fa

culty

in

posi

tion

Doctoral Degree Masters Degree Bachelor Degree

Eng

inee

ring

D

isci

plin

es

Oth

er

Dis

cipl

ines

Eng

inee

ring

D

isci

plin

es

Oth

er

Dis

cipl

ines

Eng

inee

ring

D

isci

plin

es

Oth

er

Dis

cipl

ines

R C R C R C R C R C R C1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 12 14 15=(3+5

+7+9+11+13)

16=(2-15)

17=(4+6+8+10+12+14)

Prof 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Asso.Prof

0 0 40

00

100 0 0 0 0

14 0

Asst.Prof.

0 0 30

00

110 0 0 0 0

14 0

Total 28 0 0 7 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 48

Prof= Professor, Asso. Prof=Associate Professor, Asst Prof=Assistant Professor R= Regular, C=Contract

3

Page 12: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1.4 Baseline Data (all data given for the following parameters to All Disciplines)

S. No.

Parameters 2012-13

1 Total strength of students in all programs and all year of study in the year

9442 Total women students in all programs and all year of study in the year 3933 Total SC students in all programs and all year of study in the year 3234 Total ST students in all programs and all year of study in the year 645 Total OBC students in all programs and all year of study in the year 5336 No. of Fully functional P-4 and above level Computers available for

students in the year27

7 Total No. of Text books and reference books available in Library for U.G. and P.G. students in the yea

40200

Student Teacher Ratio 19:18 % of U.G. Students placed through Campus interviews in the year 09 % of P.G. Students placed through Campus interviews in the year 010 % of high quality Under Graduates (>75 % Marks) passed out in the

year43

11 % of high quality Graduates (>75 % Marks) passed out in the year 112 Number of Research Publications in Indian refereed Journals in the

Year0

13 Number of Research Publications in International refereed Journals in the Year

014 Number of patents obtained in the year 015 Number of patents filed in the year 016 Number of sponsored research projects completed in the year 217 The Transition rate of students in percentage from 1st Year to 2nd year in

the year for : %

18 IRG from students fee and other charges in the year (Rs. In lakh) Rs 7.5219 IRG from externally funded R&D projects, consultancies in the year Rs 0.5520 Total IRG in the year (Rs. In lakh) Rs 8.0721 Total annual recurring expenditure of the institution in the year 2008-

09(Rs. In lakh)328.28

4

Page 13: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL (IDP)

2.1 Executive Summary of the IDP.

Bidar is a small district place on the extreme north part of the Karnataka State. Agriculture is the

main occupation of Bidar people. A good percentage of Bidar people eke out their livelihood from

agriculture. For the poor and backward people of Bidar and surrounding villages, higher education is a

dream. The lower and middle classes could not send their children to receive the higher education.

Keeping this view in mind, the Government of Karnataka established our college is in the year 1974.

Now it has ground and first floor building with 14 big classrooms, one staffroom, one office, one library

consisting of 42000 books, one ladies staff room four toilet rooms separate for ladies and six well

laboratories and one Principal chamber. We have a faculty comprising 41 teaching staff including 15

Associate professors,15 Assistant Professors, 05 Associate. Professor (Re-Deployed), 1 Assistant

Professor (Re-Deployed) and 40 Guest Lecturers (Temporary) 1 Librarian and 1 Physical director. Our

office has 12 Non-Teaching Staff (3 Ministerial Staff, 1 Typist, 4 Attender and 4 Peon). Our college is

in the District Centre which is the boon for the rural and backward class students. The college has an

enrollment of 789 students pursuing under graduate courses offered and 300 students pursuing post

graduate courses . We are expecting the strength more than 1500 in next academic year. We have UG

Courses namely; BA/B.Com/BBM/B.Sc. along with post graduate in History, Kannada, Economics,

Commerce, Chemistry and Computer Science. We have 42 acres campus with built up area of 16000 sq.

ft. Our students’ result is quite satisfactory and our staff is striving very hard in order to improve the

quality. And our college is accredited by NAAC with B grade in the year 2004. In order to fulfill our

Department of Collegiate Education dream, the college has taken several new educational initiatives in

the recent past. Nevertheless, our prime focus continues to drive us towards achieving increased

standard of higher education and broaden research and extension activities and outreach programme. It

is imperative, therefore, to be both creative and innovative in our approach to lead the college towards

an eminent center of learning through research intensive education.

We share our experience with others and we learn a lot from them too. This has facilitated our effort to

improve institutional governance, networking and services to community and economy. Also, we do

analyze the educational policies and programmes laid down by State and Central Governments from

time to time. Our participation in RUSA is, therefore, relevant for pursuing the policy of achieving the

desired good.

5

Page 14: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

A comprehensive write up in the prescribed format outlining overall plans and programmes may be seen

in the main body of the report.

A comprehensive faculty development programme to encourage innovative teaching practices,

outcome based tertiary education, time relevant courses, self propelled growth in research and

development through participation and contributions in International/ National Conferences,

Seminars, Symposiums, Workshops, and initiation of academic exchange programs at under

graduate and post graduate levels. The allocated fund is Rs.25 Lacs, 30 Lacs and 45 Lacs, in

successive years of the project span.

Expansion and modernization of existing infrastructure for UG and PG work (viz. Laboratories,

Library, Networking, Smart classrooms) and creation of a centralized computing and

instrumentation facility with sophisticated equipment relevant to growth of different

specializations and centralized digital library facility. The allocated amounts are Rs.75 Lacs in

the first session, 75 Lacs each in next two years and 50 Lacs in the pre-final year of the project.

For Updation of Learning Resources (Rs.20 Lacs), for procurement of furniture (2.00 crore)

establishment/ up-gradation of Central and Departmental Computer Centers(20 lacs),

Modernization/improvements of supporting departments (40 lacs), for Modernization and

strengthening of libraries and increasing access to knowledge resources (1crore), for

Refurbishment (Minor Civil Works) (1crore) is estimated.

Providing Teaching and Research Assistantships to increase enrolment in existing and new UG

and PG programmes Rs.20 lacs is demanded. Provision of resources for research support 10 lacs,

Technical assistance for procurement and academic Activities 20 lacs, Institutional management

capacity enhancement Rs.10 lacs is expected.

For Academic support, Rs.20 lacs is expected for Creation of new departments/courses, 10 lacs

for Enhanced Interaction with Industry

We need Administrative Block which is estimated Rs.25 lacs. The number of ladies enrolment is

increasing every year. But most of them are coming from remote village areas. Some of them

discontinued their education. So, it is necessary to built a Ladies Hostel which is estimated Rs

2.5 crore. It increases enrollment ratio also.

This proposal for assistance under RUSA, has been prepared, based on a SWOT analysis and Training

Need Analysis conducted in the institution. In linkage with the findings of SWOT analysis, the strategic

plan was prepared with the general objective ”to accelerate the institute from emergent stage to a

6

Page 15: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

hub of brilliance with international acceptance”. In order to achieve this, Government First Grade

College, Bidar has given emphasis for the following

Improve Employability and Learning Outcomes of Students

Enhance Industry- Institute and Society-Institute Interactions

Augment R&D and Consultancy Services

Empower and Motivate Employees for Improved Performance

Expand Teaching-Learning Facilities

Implement Institutional Reforms

Specific objectives under each general objective have been set based on TOWS matrix strategies as

identified in SWOT analysis. Based on TNA and the development plan, a detailed training plan also was

prepared. The major training programmes planned can be broadly classified as follows:

Trade skill training intended for lab staff.

Training mainly for teachers in subject areas and for support staff on the basis of job requirement.

Life skill training for all staff to improve soft skills.

Managerial Training for administrators and senior faculty members/heads of department.

The IDP also involves schemes for ensuring equity and also societal intervention and support. Detailed

action plan to achieve each of the objectives have been arrived at by the involvement of all staff of the

institution.

Detailed action plan has been prepared for implementing the proposed activities. The project will

be implemented through the Institutional RUSA Unit. The Institutional RUSA Executive Committee

under the guidance of RUSA Members will be responsible for the implementation and monitoring.

Various committees (Academic, Procurement, Civil works, Finance and Equity assurance) have been

formed and each committee is headed by a nodal officer. Plans have been chalked out for performance

auditing as well as financial auditing.

The major deliverables are increased number of Post graduates, increased transition rate,

increased high quality graduates, increased industry-institute interaction, Increased IRG, and more

research projects, increased academic output in the form of publications, books and IPRs and improved

international visibility for the institution. It is expected that, implementation of this project will support

and scale-up the ongoing efforts of Government of India, to improve the quality Education

7

Page 16: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.2. Provide the details of SWOT analysis carried out (in terms of methodology used, analysis and

information and data as collected and inferences derived with respect to strengths, weaknesses,

opportunities and threats).

A) Methodology Used

Teamwork and Stakeholder Participation

A core team of facilitators were constituted; the team comprised identified key stakeholders of our

college. The team met several times and had consultations in participatory mode. Core committee and

sub committees were constituted. Both the committees have interactive sessions with diverse groups like

financial departments, support departments, administrative sections, library and other central facilities,

and others. This helped to bring out information, determine the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities

and Threats, and prioritize the actions.

Core Committee Formation

A core team of Heads of departments (Science, Arts and Commerce) and College Advisory Committee

was constituted with Principal as Head of the Institution. The team met several times and had

consultations/brain storming sessions in participatory mode. Core committee and sub-committees were

constituted which had diverse groups from science, Arts and commerce departments, establishment

section, library staff, alumni and students. This helped to work-out and determine the institutional

strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats and accordingly action plan was drafted as per the

priorities.

8

Page 17: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Core Committee members:

HOD Department of Kannada.

HOD Department of Hindi.

HOD Department of English.

HOD Department of Urdu.

HOD Department of Arabic.

HOD Department of History.

HOD Department of Political Science.

HOD Department of Sociology.

HOD Department of Economics.

HOD Department of Education.

HOD Department of Commerce and Management.

HOD Department of Physics.

HOD Department of Mathematics.

HOD Department of Computer Science.

HOD Department of Chemistry.

HOD Department of Electronics.

HOD Department of Botany.

HOD Department of Zoology.

Department of Library.

Department of Sports.

9

Page 18: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Analytic Framework

The initials draft copy of IDP-RUSA Scheme was circulated to all departments. The inputs on

strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats were obtained from all the departments and in the light

of those inputs Institutional Development Proposal (IDP) is prepared.

Steps in preparation of SWOT Analysis Report

10

Preparation of Institutional SWOT

Analysis

Prioritizing Common Goals and Special issues

Preparation of Departmental SWOT

analysis

Brain Storming / Interactive Sessions held

Formation of Core & sub-Committee/ Distribution of SWOT Analysis Draft

Principal as Head of the Institution

Page 19: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

The key features on and off the lines in SWOT are:

Brain storming session with all staff. SWOT feedback from the students in oral

SWOT Features / Statistics:

The number of Open sessions (Brain storming) varied from department to department. Nearly all faculty members participated in the SWOT process in all the departments.

Though the sessions were organized for two-hours, in most of the cases the events were marathon.

The core committee meeting dates regarding departmental SWOT are 9th, 10th and 11th of December 2013

The views and feedback of the stakeholders, especially students and guardian’s view were recorded.

Everybody was encouraged to express their candid views. Participation with equity during SWOT Analysis has been practiced with high esteem.

B) SWOT Analysis SummaryStrengths:S1 Our College has a sprawling 42 acres campus, built up area of 16000 sq.ft.S2 We have a good library with more than 42000 number of booksS3 The campus is equipped with 7 Acres of Playground.S4 Active Cell of NSS cadre to serve the society.S4 Collective leadership, responsibility and team-work with feedback oriented performance appraisal.S5 Nurturing attitude of the department resulting all the faculty members enhanced their academic

qualification.S6 Strong Teaching-Learning Process. More emphasis on learning in the teaching learning process with

teachers as facilitators.S7 EDUSAT established to share web lectures.S8 Village students are taking more admissions in our college esp., poor, women and downtrodden. It is a boon

for them as it is the government college and free from donations.

S9 All teachers are highly committed, competent, qualified.S10 Nine Teachers are having Ph.D., Others are having M.Phlil/SLET/NET degree holders. Teachers are

encouraged to pursue Research. Some of them are doing Ph.D. They are regular contributor of research publications (nationally/ internationally), books.

S11 Strong Placement Cell facilitates Campus recruitment to most of the students. A few are placed by direct appointment immediately prior to and after completion of the degree course.

S12 Adopting latest methodology for nurturing weaker students such as remedial classes.S13 The admissions are given to all Courses without any discrimination. Students have

freedom to opt the subjects of their choice. The Arts, Science, Commerce and Management faculty has a good strength.

S14 The meritorious students get endowment prizes and scholarships given by the well- wishers.S15 The best maintenance of the campus, student discipline, value-based educational activities; dynamic,

service-oriented and committed staff and high record of results in examinations has made the institution lovable among the parents for seeking admission to their children.

S16 Successful participation of the college in extra-curricular activities like cultural programmes, sports and N.S.S. has boosted up the image of the college.

S17 The student and teacher appraisal has helped us to improve more and more in providing quality education.Table 2.2

Weaknesses:

11

Page 20: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Catchment area of the college constitutes a sizable chunk of economically low income group which acts

as an impediment/key hurdle in registering their names for enrolment in college. Although college tries its

best within its financial resources to attract such students by way of providing free admissions to female

students and financial assistance/scholarships/post-metric scholarship by approaching state social welfare

and BCM department. The human resource component (teaching faculty) is vulnerable to pre-mature and un-

timely transfers by the administrative department which badly tells upon academics and smooth functioning

of various departments.

Most of the teaching departments especially Urdu and Arabic are without permanent staff members.

Such departments are manned by coordinators & teachers on academic contract basis. Non-availability of

adequate non-teaching staff is another impediment. Number of smart-class rooms needs to be increased

along with modernization of existing laboratories. More latest laptops and desktop computers be made

available.

W1 Our college is in a socially and educationally backward area.W2 In our college, we cannot afford to give a wider choice for the students to select the

optional subjects. Every academic year, we have to apply for affiliation afresh.W3 We need more number and spacious class rooms.W4 We need a more spacious library, along with infrastructure to meet the requirements of the

students and teachers.W5 There is a shortage of teaching and non-teaching faculty.W6 Technical trainings are needed for the non-teaching facultyW7 Smart class rooms are needed along with modernization of existing laboratories. Providing

additional power back up.W8 Targeted IRG in compliance with sustainable planning of the reforms need to be framedW9 Need based planning and development of research facility is required.W10

We need well equipped library building as we have good number of books and journals.

W11

We need Conference / PPT Hall, Auditorium, Digital Language lab, Gymnasium, NSS and Sports room, separate Boys and Girls hostel

W12

We need adequate laboratory infrastructure to run UG and PG programmes like WI-FI Campus, Optical fiber network.

W13

There is a need of well equipped ladies rest room and staff room.

Table 2.3

12

Page 21: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Opportunities:

Owing to strength as envisaged above institution has potential to become post-graduate college for various

subjects especially Physics, Mathematics and Zoology provided the prerequisite facilities such as vacant

faculty positions are filled by the Government. Since the college is situated in the apple town, therefore

employability of students can be assured in sectors abetting the horticulture sector. There is wide scope for

tourism sector as the world famous fresh water body Manjra River, Karnja Dam are situated in the vicinity

of the institution as such students can be persuaded to take tourism as subject so that a tourism sector will

find its place in and around the area. The city was well known for the historicity which was the capital city

during the Bahamani reign, and the Government has been identified this place as world heritage place. An

opportunity to augment under graduate courses in science could entitle the institution for PG college.

O1 Increasing the proportion of the female students. Already, there is 60% of female students are enrolled in our college

O2 By providing more infrastructure and basic facilities, we can reduce the gap in gross enrollment ratio.

O3 We are eager to get the grants under HRD in order to develop the college. Because, we have land for increasing infrastructural development.

O4 There is a scope for faculty training in the fields of administration, computer, e-learning, e-library and others.

O5 We can start more UG and PG programs as we have highly qualified teaching staff and they are in touch with corporate world.

O6 Our College has a sprawling 42 acres campus, built up area of 16000 sq.ft.O7 We have a good library with more than 42000 number of books

Table 2.4

13

Page 22: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Threats:

It is observed that traditional subjects Pure Arts, Pure Science does not guarantee employability of the pass

outs which poses a threat to attract the students towards the college. Such state of affairs necessitates for

diversification and Vocationalization of courses so that students are ensured job opportunity. The

introduction of adhocsim/contractualism for the last decade has damaged the fabric of colleges quality-wise

& accountability which needs to be addressed to arrest the declining trend in these premier educational

institutions. Moreover insufficient teaching staff along with trained and skilled supporting staff also poses

threat to the institutions to excel. There seems a dire need to revise the course content continuously to check

the redundancy rate of some existing subjects.

T1 There is lack of interest in higher education especially in Arts and Basic Science education and no corresponding change in school education. The quality of entry into UG Courses is in question.

T2 Most of the brilliant students are attracting towards technical education. So, the availability of students for higher studies in Arts, Commerce, Science and even BBM is reducing.

T3 Unfilled faculty, inadequate funds may affect the quality of education in our collegeT4 Lack of counseling and mentoring for the students may reduce the strength of the collegeT5 There is a lack of information systems and internet networking at our college which may

reduce the efficiency in administrative work and correspondence.Table 2.5

2.2.1 The strategic plan based on SWOT Analysis developed for institutional development.

More emphasis be laid on practical component of curriculum. The students be exposed to field work

or laboratory work to some reputed R&D Units to enable them to get the firsthand and on-spot information

about subject domain.

The main challenges that need to overcome are: Enhance Institution Management Capabilities

Effective Admission process and enhanced employability in UG and PG programmes

Infrastructure Development

Creation of Modern Teaching Ambience

Results of SWOT analysis linked to the key activities proposed in the proposal.

14

Page 23: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Strategic Action Plan for Institutional Development

Sl.No.

StrategicPlan Critical Activities Link to

SWOT

Validation andVerification

methods

Link toBudget

ProposalComponent

1 Train Faculty through Development Programmes

• Training more faculty esp., Non-Teaching Staff• Emphasize Learning over teachingGuest Lecturer Staff development programme,• Employ accountability in teaching.• Encourage faculty to pursue Ph.D. programme.

• Weakness (W6)

• Strength (S6)

• Weakness (W11)

• Strength (S10)

• Teaching material and courseware;

• Lesson and Session Plan documents,• Event images.

2.12. TableNo-1Sl. No. 3

Component-10

2 EnhanceInstitutionManagementCapabilities

• Ensuring transparency and accountability;• Faculty appraisal taking into account student’s feed back.• Augmenting qualityassurance system• Set target IRG and achieve• Delegation of decision making upto HOD level

• Strength (S9)

• Strength (S17)

• Weakness (W12)

• Weakness (W8)

• Strength (S4)

• All feedback and appraisal reports.

• Minutes of Meeting,

• Documentation(Notice) of hierarchical andCollective decision.

2.12. TableNo-1Sl. No. 4

Component- 9

3 EffectiveAdmissionprocess andenhancedemployabilityin UG and PGprogrammes

• Increase assistance to attract quality students.• Scale up demand driven UG education.• Improve alumni liaison for better employability• Utilize support from Industry /corporate.• Ensuring passed out UGAnd PG students’ employability• Structure remedial class for weaker students• Attract girls students to take higher education

• Strength (S12)

• Weakness (W2)

• Strength (S11)

• Strength (S9)

•Opportunity (O5)

• Strength(S8, S15)

•opportunity (O1)

• Selection of Project Linked personnel

• UG and PG level projects andpublications;

• Placement record analysis;

• Alumni community portal;

2.12. TableNo-1Sl. No. 5, 6

Component- 7,11

4 InfrastructureDevelopment

• Modernize existinginfrastructure• Set up new UG and PG laboratories.• Provide additional power back up.• Installation of wi fi network.• Essential civil works,•Hostels• Augmentation of Centrallibrary with web• Create precessionmanufacturing and centralinstrumentation facility

• Weakness (W7)

• Weakness (W12)

• Weakness (W12)

• Weakness (W12)

• Weakness (W3)•Opportunity (O6)

•Opportunity (O7)

• Strength (S6)

• Drawing and design of new labs,• Procurementapprovals,invoicesand audited report• Calibration and test results of installedcomponent

2.12. TableNo-1Sl. No. 1, 6

Component-7

5 Creation ofModernTeachingfacilities

• Establish smart class rooms with demonstration facility;• Create better ambience to attract careers in teaching ;• Employ innovative teaching method

• Weakness (W7)

• Threat (T1)

• Strength (S6)

• Presentations (ppt)

• E – learning resource

• Installed LCD and OHPs, MIMIO etc.

2.12. TableNo-1Sl. No. 2, 3

Component-7

15

Page 24: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

6 ImprovedInstitutecollaboration

• Collaborative work for job creation and consultancy;• Creation of support fortraining needs,• Impart specialized skills for meeting future needs of the industry.• Initiate sponsored research from the industry for B.Com. and B.B.M and M. Com. students

•Opportunity (O5)

• Weakness (W6)

•Opportunity (O5)

• Weakness (W9)

• Consultancy plan

• Documented Entrepreneurship literature;

2.12. TableNo-1 Sl. No.2, 4

Component- 8

7 Scaling UpR&D andCollaborativeResearch

• Introduce sustainable and collaborative researchactivities• Generating consultancyopportunity• Need based planning ofR&D;• Collaboration with Institute of repute• Organize and participatemore in workshop, seminar, conference;• Exchange program withOther colleges and university

• Weakness (W9)

•Opportunity (O5)

• Weakness (W9)

• Weakness (W1)

• Strength (S16)

•Opportunity (O3)

• Research ProjectReport,

• Plan documents and activity schedule,

• Proceedings andJournals publication reference

2.12. TableNo-1Sl. No. 2

Component- 8

2.3 State the specific objectives and expected results of your proposal (in terms of, “Institutional strengthening and improvements in employability and learning outcomes of graduates”. These objective and results should be linked to the SWOT analysis

General Objective

1. Produce the pupils with high quality and better employability

2. Scale up quality of UG and PG education.

3. Undertake R&D initiatives, innovative projects and consultancy.

4. Improve the associated infrastructure to aid modern teaching facilities

5. Enhance the effectiveness of institutional and system management

Specific Objectives

S.No.

Specific Objectives Linked to SWOTAnalysis

Expected Outcome

1 Open up UG and PG programme. Opportunity : New UG and PG courseWeakness: Need based plan

Demand driven UG and PG programme

2 Enhancement of intake in the existingUG and PG courses

Strength: Popularizing UG and PG course

Scaled up UG and PG Programme

3 Mandatory participation in annualstudents’ project rewarding programme

Weakness: lack of quality projects in BBM Course

Quality improvementin UG and PG projects

4 Up-gradation of campus with cloud computing and wireless networking with latest technology.

Opportunity: VMwarebased framework ofcomputation

Improved infrastructure; maintenance,modernization, performance optimization.

5 Providing 100% faculty andNon-Teaching staff members

Weakness: Plannedfaculty and staffdevelopment

Improvement in overall educational quality and teaching standard

16

Page 25: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

6 A proactive effort for intensive interaction with industries for at least one session in each semester for UG and PG . students

Strength: Placement Cell through Job-Fair

Improved industry –institute collaboration

7 To build up a strong academic network with other institutions (at least with 2 institutions).

Strength: Goodnetwork with institute of importance

Collaborative academic works

8 To implement socially relevant projectsfor the benefit of SC/ST, backwardclasses and minorities

Threat: sudden growthin higher education

Supporting weakerstudents with socialresponsibility

9 Establishment of Administrative Block, Hostels for Boys and Ladies, Conference / PPT Hall, Auditorium, Language lab, Gymnasium, NSS and Sports room, ladies rest room and staff room and spacious library

Weakness: precessionfacility

Improved Infrastructure

10 Augmentation of Computing Facility. Weakness: limited numbers of computer facility

Improvedinfrastructure

17

Page 26: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.4 Action plan for:

a) Improving employability of graduates.It is proposed to tackle the employability issue of students by short-term and long-term

measures. During the project period all the short-term measures will be implemented and long-term measures initiated. The

short-term measures include the following;

I. Conduct remedial classes to weak students:

II. Develop positive attitude in students through counseling

III. Establish Finishing School for Communication and Soft skill development

IV. Strengthen the facilities of the Career Guidance & Placement Cell

V. Provide scholarships to attract talented students

VI. Improve credibility and visibility of the institution

VII. Establish Educational Resource Centre

VIII. VIII. Conduct coaching classes for GATE/CAT/IES and other competitive Examinations

The long term measures include the following

I. Designing of industry-oriented curriculum

II. Ensuring fruitful industry-institute interaction

III. Utilizing the network of alumni to bring in more companies for Recruitment

IV. Effective Feedback system from Employers

18

Page 27: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Action plan for Improving employability of graduates

Sl.No Activity

Project Duration (Months)

1-3

4-6

7-9

10-1

2

13-1

5

16-1

8

19-2

1

22-2

4

25-2

7

28-3

0

31-3

3

34-3

6

37-3

9

40-4

2

23-4

5

46-4

8

1 Conduct remedial classes to weak students √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

2 Establish a full fledged counseling cell √ √

3Conduct programmes for developing positive attitudes among students

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

4 Strengthen the Language lab facilities √ √ √

5Communication and Soft skill development programmes

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

6Strengthen the facilities of the Career Guidance & Placement Cell

√ √

7 Placement training programmes √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

8 Conduct of mock competitive examinations √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

9 Establish Finishing school √ √

10 Conduct of bridge Courses √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

11 Improve credibility and visibility of the institution √ √ √ √ √

12 Industrial training to students √ √ √ √

13 Conduct add-on courses √ √ √ √ √ √ √

14Designing of industryoriented curriculum

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

15 Strengthening the network of alumni √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

16 Training for GATE/IES and other examinations √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

17 Establish Educational Resource Centre √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

19

Page 28: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

b) Increased learning outcomes of the students

It is proposed to improve the learning outcomes of students by a set of activities as given below.

I. Modernization of existing laboratories

II. Establishment of new Laboratories

III. Enhancing Digital Classrooms and Seminar halls

IV. Expert Lectures under Visiting Faculty Programme

V. Formative Evaluation : Practice tests and quizzes

VI. Standardization of Summative evaluation system

VII. Improved Performance appraisal of instruction

VIII. Establishment of Collaborative Learning Assistance Cell

IX. Set up Educational Resource Portal

X. Introducing new curriculum in tune with the latest developments

20

Page 29: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Action plan for Increased learning outcomes of the studentsSl.N

o ActivityProject Duration (Months)

1-3

4-6

7-9

10-1

2

13-1

5

16-1

8

19-2

1

22-2

4

25-2

7

28-3

0

31-3

3

34-3

6

37-3

9

40-4

2

23-4

5

46-4

8

1 Modernization of existing laboratories. √ √ √ √ √ √

2 Establishment of new Laboratories √ √ √ √ √ √

3Enhancing Digital Classrooms and seminar halls

√ √ √ √

4Structured delivery of lectures through smart class rooms

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

5Live and deferred streaming of expert lectures

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

6Expert Lectures under Visiting Faculty Programme

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

7 Formative evaluation: Practice tests and quizzes √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

8Standardization of Summative evaluation system

√ √

9 Regular Performance appraisal of instruction √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

10 Development of Econtent through DSpace √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

11 Introduction of MLearning √ √ √ √

12 Industry oriented project work by students √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

13Awareness and training on latest software tools and Industry standards

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

14 Strengthen Innovation Centre √ √

15 Undertake Socially relevant project work √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

16 Conduct of project contests √ √ √ √ √

17Establishment of collaborative learning assistance cell

√ √

18 Set up Educational Resources portal √ √

19Sponsor students for participation in technical events, Industrial visits

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

20Introducing new curriculum in tune with the latest developments

√ √ √ √ √ √ √

21

Page 30: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

c) Obtaining autonomous institution status within 2 years

The institution is already given 2(f) & 12(b) status by the UGC which makes it eligible for

applying for autonomous status. As a first step towards achieving autonomy, the stake holders of the

institution will be made aware of the need for having autonomy and responsibilities involved. It will be

ensured that no part of the college community is found unprepared for receiving autonomy. Motivation

and involvement of faculty and staff is required for the promotion of innovative reforms. Seminars,

workshops and consultations will be organized to make the staff familiar with the concept, objectives

and rationale of autonomy. Additionally the institution and resources may be prepared for the new

responsibility which it is called upon to shoulder. These include institutional preparation, departmental

preparation, faculty preparation and preparation of students and the local community.

Action Plan for Obtaining autonomous institution status within 2 yearsSl.N

o ActivityProject Duration (Months)

1-3

4-6

7-9

10-1

2

13-1

5

16-1

8

19-2

1

22-2

4

25-2

7

28-3

0

31-3

3

34-3

6

1 Awareness and orientation to faculty, staff and students √

2 Preparation of application for Autonomy √ √

3

Establishment of bank accounts namely Corpus fund, Faculty Development Fund, Equipment eplacement Fund and Maintenance Fund

4Preparation of a documents/manual for management procedures, accounting and auditing

√ √ √

5 Strengthening Examination Cell √ √ √ √ √ √ √6 Strengthening Grievance Redressal Cell √

7 Strengthening the system of Feedback on instruction √

8 Strengthening Purchase Cell √

9 Establishment of Curriculum development cell √

10 Strengthening administrative office and Office Automation √ √ √

11 Establishment of Centre for Industrial consultancy and sponsored research √ √

12 Establishing Staff and Faculty development Centre √

13 Establishing Centre for Extension activities √

14 Establishing Legal Cell √15 Strengthening Nature club and √

22

Page 31: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

d) Achieving the targets of 60% of the eligible UG and PG programs accredited within two years of joining the project and 100% accreditation obtained applied for by the end of the Project of the eligible UG and PG Programs.

The institution proposes to get accreditation of all eligible courses by the end of 2 Years.

Action Plan for Obtaining Accreditation

Sl.No Activity

Project Duration (Months)

1-3

4-6

7-9

10-1

2

13-1

5

16-1

8

19-2

1

22-2

4

25-2

7

28-3

0

31-3

3

34-3

6

1 Awareness and orientation to faculty, staff and students √

2 Preparation of application for Accreditation √ √

3 Preparation of Documentation √ √ √4 Removal of non-compliance √ √ √ √ √ √ √

5 Internal Assessment for preparedness √ √ √

6 Monitoring and Rectification of drawbacks √ √ √ √

7 Accreditation √

23

Page 32: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

e) Implementation of academic and nonacademic reforms (details given in RUSA Document)

One of the major objectives outlined in the project implementation plan is the

implementation of academic and nonacademic reforms such that the administration becomes

transparent, efficient and accountable. The major reforms envisaged are outlined below.

Governance

Autonomy

Financial reforms

Faculty recruitment

Evaluation of instruction of faculty by students

Non Academic Reforms

f) Interaction with industry in order to promote

Managerial Skills Development Industrial Avenues Awareness Facilities and Provisions under various Schemes promoted by Government of India & State

Government. Sl.No.

Activity Project Months1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-14

1 Initiating short-term programme with Industry

2 Academic networking with Industry /other Institutes

√ √ √ √

3 Creating scope for the UG dissertation addressing industry problem and assigning one supervisor

√ √ √ √ √

4 Creating scope for UG students attending Industrial internship

√ √ √ √ √ √

5 Organize special lecture session by Industry people at UG level.

√ √

6 The faculties and the students will be exposed to Professional Skill Development Institutions through specialized Training Programs, both may be In-house or through Out Bound Learning process.

In the bar-chart, only invocation time span of the activities are highlighted with right mark. The continuation activities are extended throughout the project span.

g) Enhancement of Research &Consultancy Activities 24

Page 33: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Quantitatively increasing and qualitatively improving research by our faculty individually,

jointly and collaboratively. Number of faculty members pursuing their research work. Research

publication by the faculty members, in referred journals of National and International repute. There is a

necessity of establishing Research and Development Cell in our college. Conference, seminar,

workshops will be conducted in collaboration with professional societies. Professional Institutions will

be utilized for both the research and consultancy activities for the faculty and the students.

Action Plan for Research ActivitiesSl.No.

Activity Project Months1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-24

1 Scaling up Research projects taken up by the students in emerging and sustainable areas

√ √ √ √ √

2 Organizing / hosting Research events √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

3 Create R&D facility and research outcomes

√ √ √ √

4 Scaling up and assistance for publicationsin journals/ proceedings

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

5 Practice of Innovative teachingmethodologies

√ √ √ √ √ √

Action Plan for Consultancy ActivitiesSl.No.

Activity Project Months1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-14

1 Identify areas of consultancy needed √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √2 Increase hosting of consultancy

activities more frequently√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

3 Organize lectures and workshopsby academicians of repute

√ √ √ √ √ √

4 Activate joint initiative with us andwith specific Professional Institutions

√ √ √ √ √ √

25

Page 34: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.5. Provide an action plan for organizing a Finishing School and for improving the academic performance of SC/ST/OBC/academically weak students through innovative methods, such as remedial and skill development classes for increasing the transition rate and pass rate with the objective of improving their employability.

Government First Grade College has above 70% of its students who belong to Other Backward

Communities and another 15% belonging to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe. 90% of the students

admitted are coming from economically weaker sections. Considering such a huge proportion of

students belonging to these categories in the rolls, it is very important that the college caters to weaker

students of these sections. Even though the students who are admitted to the college are highly

meritorious, special care shall be taken to ensure that academically weak students of these categories

come out successful in examinations. Staff in charges of each batches will be required to inform the

concerned nodal officer of the project, the list of students who require special attention. Special classes

for them will be undertaken

Sl.No.

Activity Project Months1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-14

1 Identifying the problems related to the areas of low academic performances, transition and pass rates

√ √

2 Identification of weak students √ √

3 Organizing the special classes for those slow learners through the following activities Remedial teaching Group work Activity oriented teaching Personal monitory by the teachers Counseling Conducting extra classes

√ √ √ √ √ √

4 Organizing the special classes for increasing the transition and pass rate through the following activities Conducting tests frequently Unit based examinations will be conducted Emphasizing and implementing continuous

performance evaluation Re-teaching the difficult units Workshops on writing and reading methods

√ √ √ √ √ √

5 Organizing Skill Development Programmes through the following activities Introducing craft skills Workshops and trainings will be conducted on

employable skills like photography, computer typing, tailoring, knitting and weaving etc.

√ √ √ √ √ √

6 Activate joint initiative with us andwith specific Professional Institutions

√ √ √ √ √ √

26

Page 35: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.6. Provide an action plan for strengthening of UG and PG programmes(It includes measures to attract qualified students and maintain high quality standards)

The college has, at present, 4 under Graduate programme on BA, BCom, BBM and B.Sc and 6

postgraduate programme on History, Kannada, Economics, M.Com, Computer Science and Chemistry.

It is proposed to start one more UG programme BCA during the project period, BCA course is a must

for the CS department to improve its overall quality. With the emergence of computer Science such as

and hence the need for skilled cyber security professionals in large numbers has become essential.

Sl.No.

Activity Project Months1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-24

1 Introduction of BCA. course. √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √2 Motivate +2 students to pursue UG

programme.√ √ √ √ √ √

3 Up-gradation of existing UG courses by providing more optional subjects and establishment of new UG and PG Laboratories

√ √ √ √ √ √

4 Faculty Development and Training √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √5 Incorporate professional and free

electives. Reconstruction / restructuring of courses if number of students drop over the year.

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

6 Approaching to University to enhanceenrolment of UG programmes from 800 to 1100 and PG programmes form 300 to 400

√ √ √

7 Provision for more calibration and testing tools

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

8 Incorporating variation in test mechanism (Marathon, surprise tests) for better evaluation

√ √ √ √ √ √

9 Emphasizing and implementing continuous performance evaluation.

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

10 Scaling up employability on completion of course

√ √ √ √ √ √

11 Providing research support to selective UG and PG students through various collaborative programme

√ √ √ √

12 Publishing the achievement (toppers /prize/awards) of the students in theNewsletter, Official Websites

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

27

Page 36: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.7. Summary of Training Needs Analysis carried out. Provided Faculty Development Plan from the first 18 months to achieve improved competence based on Training Needs Analysis (TNA) in the following areas.

The training need analysis of the institution was carried out with the assistance of Commerce and

Management department of our College. All faculty, technical staff and supporting staff were included in

the analysis. The Proforma for TNA was circulated to all and the data were collected. Based on the

institutional requirements and gap areas identified a detailed training plan was prepared. The type of

training and topics were identified based on the individual requirement, departmental requirement and

Institutional requirements. The type of training programmes include Basic and Advanced pedagogy,

Subject/domain knowledge enhancement, Attendance in activities such as workshops, seminars,

Improvement in faculty qualifications, Improving research capabilities. The identified subjects were

classified into four tables Trade skill training, Faculty training, Life skill training, and Managerial

training. The detailed list of institutions offering courses in above areas have been collected along with

the training schedule. The institutions where custom designed course are conducted as per our

requirement were also identified. In areas where large number of faculty and staff have to be trained, In-

house courses are planned. The schedule is prepared in such a way that the overall activities of the

institution are not affected.

Summarized Training Need Analysis for Faculty membersNature oftraining

Department/Section

Numberof staff

When

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6

(1-6month)

(7- 12month)

(13-18month)

(19-24month)

(25-30month)

31-36month)

Basic and advanced pedagogy training

All the Departments;Training organization is as decided by the Department

All Staff Members

√ √ √ √ √ √

Subject / domain knowledge enhancement

English 1 √Kannada 3 √ √ √History 3 √ √ √Political Science 2 √ √Sociology 1 √Economics 2 √ √ √Education 1 √Commerce and Management

5 √ √ √ √ √ √

28

Page 37: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

SubjectsComputer Science

3 √ √ √

Physics 2 √ √Mathematics 2 √ √Electronics 2 √ √Botany 1 √Zoology 1 √

Attendance in activities such as workshops,seminars, etc.

English 1 √Kannada 3 √ √ √History 3 √ √ √Political Science 2 √ √Sociology 1 √Economics 2 √ √ √Education 1 √Commerce and Management Subjects

5 √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer Science

3 √ √ √

Physics 2 √ √Mathematics 2 √ √Electronics 2 √ √Botany 1 √Zoology 1 √Total

Improvement in FacultyQualification

English 1 √Kannada 3 √ √ √History 3 √ √ √Political Science 2 √ √Sociology 1 √Economics 2 √ √ √Education 1 √Commerce and Management Subjects

5 √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer Science

3 √ √ √

Physics 2 √ √Mathematics 2 √ √Electronics 2 √ √Botany 1 √Zoology 1 √

Improving ResearchCapabilities

English 1 √Kannada 3 √ √ √History 3 √ √ √

29

Page 38: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Political Science 2 √ √Sociology 1 √Economics 2 √ √ √Education 1 √Commerce and Management Subjects

5 √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer Science

3 √ √ √

Physics 2 √ √Mathematics 2 √ √Electronics 2 √ √Botany 1 √Zoology 1 √

Soft Skills Development

All the Departments;

Allfacultymembers

Managerial & Technical Competencies

All the Departments;Training organization is as decided by the Department

Allfacultymembers

Financial Tooling and ControlAuditing

Training organization is as decided by the Department

Allfacultymembers

30

Page 39: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.8 Action plan for training technical and other staff in functional areas.

The list of administrative, technical and others, other staffs are provided below. Short term (up to

three months) training/development plan for Non-Teaching Staff,

Support/Technical/Administrative/Finance Staff:Sl.No.

Area ofTraining/develop

ment

Area ofTraining/development

Name ofsuitable staffmember fortraining/development

Durati on Days)

Tentativedateof training/development program

Trainerorganization

When

Phase1

Phase2

Phase3

Phase4

Phase5

Phase 6

(1-6month)

(7- 12month)

(13-18month)

(19-24month)

(25-30month)

(31-36month)

1 Principal Administrative Training

Prof. Shivaraj M Devappa

1 month 01.06.2014 By Dept

√ √

2 Non-Teaching Staff-Typist (SDA)

Office WorkThrough Software

Jagadevi

4weeks

01.05.2014 By Dept

Hardwaremaintenance

2weeks

01.05.2015 By Dept

√ √

(FINANCE) Accounts

3weeks

01.11.2015 By Dept

√ √ √

3 Support Staff- Physical Director

Office WorkThrough Software

Khaleel Ahemad

4weeks

01.10.2014 In-house

√ √

Hardwaremaintenance

2weeks

01.06.2015 In-house

√ √

4 Librarian Office automation Smt. Parvati

Methre

15 days 01.07.2014 By Dept

Training onLibsys

4 weeks 01.10.2015 By Dept

e-library 4 weeks 01.05.2016 By Dept

√ √

5 Group-DAttender

Training forimprovement in daily working skill

Shri.Subhash

7days

01.07.2014 By Dept

Short termeducational course

30days

01.10.2015 In-house

√ √

Up gradation ofskill set in officeassistance

1 month 01.06.2016 By Dept

√ √

6 Group-DPeon

Training forimprovement in daily workingskill

Shri. Shaheen Sultana

7days

01.09.2014 By Dept

√ √

Short termeducational course

30days

01.11.2015 In-house

√ √ √

31

Page 40: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Summary of Budget Requirement (in Rs.)Sl. No Particulars 2014-15 2015-16

1 Faculty qualification Up gradation 40000 400002 In House Basic Padagological Training -- --3 Subject Networking and Research Competence 30000 500004 Training of Senior nonteaching Staff. 20000 50005 Training of technical support staff 10000 5000

Total 100000 100000

2.9 Relevance and coherence of Institutional Development Proposal with State’s / National (in case of CFIs) Industrial / Economic Development Plan.

The prime objective of IDP is to increase the GER of socially and economically weaker sections

with special emphasis on outgoing students to seek employment /self-employment to provide skilled

expected competency and to enrich their skills.

Keeping in view NSDC district wise skill gap study for the Bidar district it is found that SWOT

report analysis

a) The strengths are agricultural is the major economic activity enrich in cash crops, district has

numerous historical tourist attraction sports and has potential for tourism, proximity to

Hyderabad city and its international link.

b) The weaknesses are remoteness and backwardness of the district, lack of industrial activities

and heavy dependence on agriculture.

c) The opportunities are handicraft sector, tourism sector, agro based industries poultry and

animal husbandry.

d) The threats are quality of education, in adequate infrastructure facilities in the district.

Based on the SWOT analysis the demand for skilled youths is as shown below

Report for 2012-22 Incremental Supply Incremental demand

Highly skilled 1% 6%Skilled 19% 25%Semi Skilled 38% 41%Minimally skilled 41% 28%

32

Page 41: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

To fulfill this skill gap we would like to start in our institution certificate courses in Tourism, Hotel

Management, Bidri handicrafts as Bidar is known for historical places and world famous Bidri works

which is registered Geographical Indication (GI) status. Government is already taking measures to help

the sector. Karnataka state handicraft development corporation Ltd (KSHDC) is assisting artisans in

manufacturing bidri ware because of the rich heritage of the craft. Karnataka Govt. to increase tourism

industry in Bidar is trying to the improve the infrastructure facilities by linking all the tourist attraction

throw roads so that the tourist can visit all the places.

33

Page 42: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.10 Participation of departments/faculty in the proposal preparation and

Implementation.The following Figure 3 depicts the participation hierarchy incorporating the entire constituents in

formulating the Training Need Analysis and overall IDP

Figure 3: Involvement of the departments/ faculty in IDP

The authority collectively leaded the entire process through setting up SWOT parameters for

encouragement of all participating members by making them understand their responsibilities

and duties not only during preparation of application for the IDP but also about the greater

responsibility they may need to discharge in the future.

Faculty, Students, non-teaching staff and all the departments were actively involved during

SWOT analysis and preparing Strategic Plan

It is evident from the SWOT Analysis Figure 1 in Section 2.2., and in the Figure 3 above that

how each participating departments were involved and provided constituent representation in

IDP Development

34

Principal

HOD’s of all Departments

Non-Teaching Staff Faculty Members

Students

Page 43: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

I. Board of Governors was formulated:-

1. Principal : Prof. Shivaraj M. Devappa2. Senior Faculty : Dr. K Chunnulal3. RUSA Coordinator : Ravindrakumar

Co-coordinator : Dr. Girija G. Mangalgatti 4. NAAC coordinator : Alka D. Solankar5. IQAC Coordinator : Gadde Dileep6. Management Faculty : Dr. Sharnappa S. M7. Senior Faculty(HODs) a. Savale Tukaram

b. Abdull Ameer Patil c. Raghunanda B

d. Panditkumar 9. Student Representatives : a. Sri. Asthapal

b. Satish 10. Office : Sri Lalahamad

II. Core CommitteeCoordinator : RavindrakumarCo-Coordinator : Dr. Girija G. MangalgattiMembers : Dhanraj Biradar

: Gadde Dileep : Alka D. Solankar : Savale Tukaram

III. Project Monitoring Committee Principal : Prof. Shivaraj M. Devappa

RUSA Coordinator : RavindrakumarAcademic activities : Dhanraj BiradarCivil works : Dr.S.G.Ramadas ReddyProcurement : Alka D. SolankarFinance : Savale TukaramEquity : Dr. Girija G. Mangalgatti

35

Page 44: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.11 Institutional project implementation arrangementsThe guidelines provided in the Project Implementation Plan (PIP) brochure are practiced

religiously in shaping up the Institutional project implementation plan. The planned project organization

structure at Institution level is presented in the following Figure 4.

Figure 4:

Institutional Project Organizational Structure

N.B: The Project Nodal Officers detail is given under Section 1.1

The Institutional project management unit will ensure implementation arrangement of the

following academic activities through the existing Institutional hierarchy, RUSA Coordinator and

Project Nodal officers. The assigned responsibilities of the functions are as follows:

Guidelines:

Formation of Committee as per RUSA guideline comprised of representative from Academic

Officials, Faculty, Non-Teaching Staff, Guest Faculty and students.

A senior Faculty will coordinate the activity of the projects in the institution

RUSA Unit will operate through different committees

36

Principal

RUSA Co-Ordinator

AcademicActivities

Committee TrainingResearch

Committee

Page 45: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

The Institutional project management unit will ensure implementation arrangement of the following

academic activities:

Sl. No. Parameters / Functions Responsibility assigned to

1 Admission of students as per State /University Admission Policy

Academic Activity Committee Equity assurance plan Committee

2 Implementing the syllabus of the university properly

Academic Activity Committee

3 Introduce flexibility in curriculum with choice of electives

Academic Activities Committee

4 Development of new methods of evaluation and their frequency, conducting examination anddeclaring result

RUSA Coordinator Equity assurance plan Committee

5 Demand driven value added course Academic Activities Committee

6 Development of effective system for faculty evaluation by the students

RUSA Coordinator

7 Starting new course, new programmes. Re-orientationand restructuring and withdrawal of existing programme

RUSA Coordinator Academic Activities Committee Procurement Committee

8 Introduction of innovative teaching learning process

Academic Activities Committee

9 Faculty and Students Skill Enhancement programmes as per needs

RUSA Coordinator Procurement Committee

10 Enter into collaborative arrangements with outside bodies /experts for curricula development, employment oriented value addition to courses, new teaching learning methodologies and innovations

RUSA Coordinator

Training and Research Committee

11 Development of Faculty for academic advancement

Training and Research Committee

12 Development of Faculty Training assessment needs

Training and Research Committee

13 Inviting experts forspecial lectures

Academic Activity Committee

14 Development of Infrastructure RUSA Coordinator

15 Maintenance of Accountability in administration

Finance Committee

37

Page 46: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.12 Provide an Institutional project budget as per table below: Institutional Project Budget (Rs. In Crore)

Sl.No Activities

Proj

ect

Allo

catio

n

Financial year

2014

-15

2015

-16

2016

-17

1. Infrastructure1. Modernization and strengthening of laboratories 0.9 0.2 0.3 0.42. Establishment of new laboratories for new UG programs 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.153. Modernization of classrooms 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.154. Updation of Learning Resources 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.035. Procurement of furniture 0.3 0.05 0.1 0.156. Establishment/ Up-gradation of Central andDepartmental Computer Centers

0.6 0.1 0.2 0.3

7. Modernization/improvements of supporting departments 0.12 0.03 0.04 0.058. Modernization and strengthening of libraries and increasing access to knowledge resources

0.9 0.2 0.3 0.4

9. Refurbishment (Minor Civil Works) 0.09 0.02 0.03 0.042. Research and development support

Providing Teaching and Research Assistantships to increase enrolment in existing and new UG programmes

0 0 0 0

Provision of resources for research support 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.02Enhancement of R&D and institutional consultancyActivities

0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03

3 Faculty Development SupportFaculty and Staff Development (including faculty qualification up-gradation, pedagogical training, and organizing / participation of faculty in workshops, seminars and conferences) for improved competence based on TNA

0.09 0.02 0.03 0.04

4 Institutional reformsTechnical assistance for procurement and academicactivities

0.4 0.05 0.15 0.2

Institutional management capacity enhancement 0 0 0 05 Academic support

Creation of new departments/courses 0 0 0 0Enhanced Interaction with Industry 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01Student support activities 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03

6 Other infrastructure 0 0 0 0Administrative Block 0 0 0 0Ladies Hostel 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 4.26 0.82 1.44 2.00

38

Page 47: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.13 Provide the targets against the deliverables as listed belowSl. No.

INDICATORWeightage

in %Numerato

rDenominator

Value of Indicator

Present Rating

Present Score

Target Rating

Target Score

GOVERNANCE QUALITY INDEX -16%

1 % of Faculty position vacant 2 21 502 % of Non-permanent Faculty 4 48 50

3 % of Nonteaching Staff to Teaching Staff

3 13 30

4 Total Number of Undergraduate programmes

1 4

5 Total Number of Postgraduate programmes

1 6

6 Total Number of Doctoral Programmes 1 1

7 Faculty Appointment Turn around/Cycle time in months

2 12

8 Delay in Payment of Monthly salary payment of faculty

2 1

ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INDEX-21.5%

9 Delay in exam conduction and declaration of results

3.5 0

10 Plagiarism Check 1 011 Accreditation 4 70.512 Teacher Student ratio 4 30 94513 % of Visiting professors 1 0 30

14 % of graduates employed by convocation

0.5 77 20

15 % Number of students receiving awards at National and International level

0.5 0 945

16 % of expenditure on Library, cyber library and laboratories per year 1 854994 32972951

17 Ratio of expenditure on teaching staff salaries to non-teaching staff salaries 1 29278309 2296976

18 % of faculty covered under pedagogical training 1 5 30

19 % of faculty involved in “further education” 0.5 7 30

20 Dropout rate 1.5 277 10621 No of foreign collaborations 1.5 022 Subscription to INFLIBNET 0.5 No

EQUITY INITIATIVE INDEX - 12.5%

23 SC Student% 3 323 94424 ST Student% 3 64 94425 Gender Parity 3 551 39326 Urban to Rural Student population 2 400 54427 Existence of CASH 0.5 Yes28 Existence of Social Protection Cell 0.5 Yes

29 Language assistance programs for weak students 0.5 Yes

REASERCH AND INNOVATION INDEX - 24%

39

Page 48: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

30 Per-faculty publications 2 0 3031 Cumulative Impact Factor of publication 3 0 3032 H Index 2 0 0

33 % of staff involved as principal researcher

1 1 30

34% of research projects fully or more than 50% funded by external agencies, industries etc

2 0 10

35 Total no of patents granted 1 0 30

36 % of faculty receiving national/international awards 1 0 30

37 % of research income 1 0 20000000

38 Doctoral degrees awarded per academic staff 1 0 30

39 % doctoral degrees in total number of degrees awarded 3 0 106

40 % expenditure on research and related facilities 1 0 25000000

41 Digitization of Masters and Doctoral thesis 0.5 1

42 UPE/CPE 3.5 1

43 % of Income generated from non-grant sources 2 0 25000000

STUDENT FACILITIES - 15%

44 No of new professional development programs 1 0

45 Existence of Placement Cells and Placement Policy 1 Yes

46 % of expenditure on infrastructure maintenance and addition 3 418690 32972951

47 Availability of hostel per out-station female student 3 0 183

48 Availability of hostel per out-station male student 2 0 340

49 % of students on scholarship 2 229 94450 Average scholarship amount per student 1 823499 94451 Student Experience Surveys 1 Yes52 Graduate Destination Surveys 1 Yes

Infrastructure and Others - 11%

53 %Income generated from training courses 1 0 25000000

54 % Income generated from consulting 1 0 2500000055 Infrastructural sufficiency 3 No56 Computer coverage 3 30 94457 Internet connectivity of Campus 3 Yes

40

Page 49: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.14 Project Targets of Institutional Development Proposal (IDP) Output and Outcome Targets.

Outcome Output Indicator Unit 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Higher GRE

Enrolments Number Crores

VocationalisationGreater Pool of trained manpower

Numbers in Lakhs 0 50 100

Better employability

Relevant courses

Greater proportion of choice based credit subjects

%

0 0 0

Enrolment in job oriented courses

Lakhs

0 100 200

Inter disciplinary and cross disciplinary learnings

New courses/ Programmes giving students a range of options to choose subjects

%

- PG-3UG-5 PG-2

Better monitoring of student career progression

Results of student experience surveys and graduate destination surveys

% of graduating students at institutional level

70% 75% 80%

Quality gains

Faculty (ratio)

Improved student Teacher Ratio

Ratio

40:1 35:1 30:1

Per studentSpace Classroom

Sqft perstudent

Sqft perstudent 2 x 2 2.5 x 2.5 3 x 3

Per studentSpace Laboratory

Sqft perstudent

Sqft perstudent 4 x 4 4.5 x 4.5 5 x 5

41

Page 50: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2.15 Give an action plan for ensuring that the project activities would be sustained after the end of the Project.

The constitution of the Board of Governors (BoG) for Government First Grade College, Bidar,

facilitates the institution to attain autonomous status for successful implementation of RUSA. All

powers for the institutional management are vested with BoG. However, BoG will delegate the powers

to Principal, Head of Departments and other appropriate functionaries of the institution for efficient and

effective management of the institution. Various committees and sub-committees (as mentioned in IDP)

will be formed at the institutional level to support the functioning of BoG. Hence Govt. First Grade

College Bidar will be able to plan its activities, allocate, spend funds and monitor its progress as planned

in the proposal. Thus the institution will be able to exercise required autonomies for the successful

implementation and completion of the project. The overall control of the grant will be vested with BoG

as stated above. Different committees as mentioned in IDP are formed and the proposals for the

envisaged activities (such as purchase, training, refurbishment works etc.) as initiated by different

departments will have to be approved by the respective committees constituted for the purpose. This will

be scrutinized by the finance committee to ensure strict adherence to IDP guidelines. The expenditure

for the activities will be committed only after getting authorization from respective committees.

Spending activity is planned to be monitored through monthly review meetings and progress reports.

Since the Principal and HODs will be granted financial powers as envisaged in IDP for the project

implementation, the block grant can be utilized in an expedited manner. Since the proposals will be

scrutinized and monitored at different levels, the institution will be able to utilize block grant effectively

and efficiently. Regular auditing of performance and expenditure will be conducted by audit teams

appointed by BoG. This is in addition to the regular auditing by the Government and Accountant

General. One of the strengths of the institute is its talented faculty base and the locality. It is the only

Degree College in the District of Bidar. To take advantage of these, our proposal includes conduct of

many essential value added short-term courses and training programs. This eventually will become a

major revenue earner. Marketing of in-house products and services are also possible leading to

additional revenue generation. This proposal is aimed at acquiring more advanced and sophisticated

equipment and instruments in order to improve the quality of UG level education as well as augmenting

comprehensive testing and analysis facilities. This will help to improve the consultancy and testing

facilities and hence the revenue generation too. It is also proposed to involve 75% faculty in research

activities. The research funding from various funding agencies will be obtained and the research

activities continued even after the completion of the project.

42

Page 51: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

The institution also plans to collect funds from the CDC Chairmen and members. It also has an

option of enhancing the students institutional fees by 10% which may not be extra burden on the

students. Institutional RUSA comity will approach the local donors and philanthropist; industrialists

who would readily help give financial help to our educational institution. Finally the teaching and non-

teaching staff of the college will contribute to the institution to fulfill the plans planned.

43

Page 52: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Evaluation of Institutional Development Proposal (ID)S. No Evaluation Parameters Marks

I Institutional Preparedness and Implementation FeasibilityA Clarity of institutional basic information including baseline data

B Overall proposal implementation feasibility

1 Clarity in the identification of general development objectives, related specific objectives, their expected results, and its coherence with SWOT analysis

2 Have the key activities been identified clearly and adequately for each specific-objective

3 Adequacy of the Institutional Project implementation arrangementsC Quality of SWOT analysis

1 Appropriateness for the procedure adopted for the conduct of SWOT analysis and adequacy of participation of stakeholders

2 Clarity in the identification of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

D Coherence of proposal with State's/regional development planE Reasonability of proposed budget

Sub-total (I)II Clarity and Quality of the Action Plans for:

F Scaling-up research and innovation

1 quality of action plan for quantitatively increasing and qualitatively improving research activities

2 quality of action plan to transfer technology and for commercialization of R&D (the innovation agenda)

G Scaling-up PhD enrolment through existing and new programmes

H Scaling-up enrolment into UG/Masters programmes in existing and new programmes

I research collaborative activities with Institution at National and International level

1 identification of options to improve and increase research collaborations at National and international levels

2 clarity in identification of expected quality enhancement in Masters and doctoral programmes and faculty research

J Coherence of proposal with State's/regional development planK Faculty development including pedagogical training to:

1 Develop faculty/technical staffin subject domain2 improve pedagogical skills of faculty for better student learning

L Identification of weak students and for improvement in their learning outcomes through finishing school

Sub-total (II)TOTAL (I+II)

44

Page 53: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Building Plan

45

Page 54: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

46

Page 55: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

47

Page 56: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

NAAC Certificate

48

Page 57: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

49

Page 58: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Staff DetailsTeaching Staff Details1. Name of Teaching Staff Prof. Shivaraj M. Devappa2. Designation Principal3. Department Kannada4. Date of Joining in the institution 01/09/2013

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil NoSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 327. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Dr. K Chunnu Lal2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department Kannada4. Date of Joining in the institution 12/10/2002

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil PhDSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 297. Paper Published 58. Papers published in Conferences 119 PhD Guided? Yes/No No10. Projects Guided 011. Books Published 1112. Consultancy Activities:

1. Name of Teaching Staff Patil Shrikant V2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Kannada4. Date of Joining in the institution 18/11/2004

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil NoSLET/NET NET

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 117. Paper Published

1. Name of Teaching Staff Nagamma2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Kannada4. Date of Joining in the institution 25/09/2009

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 47. Paper Published 0

50

Page 59: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1. Name of Teaching Staff Abdulla Ameer Patil2. Designation Associate Preofessor3. Department Hindi4. Date of Joining in the institution 21/06/1996

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 187. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Singode Amarnath2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Hindi4. Date of Joining in the institution 18/08/2004

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 117. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Alka D. Solankar2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department English4. Date of Joining in the institution 01/07/1994

5. Qualifications with Class/Grade

PG MAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 227. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Raghunanda2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Physics4. Date of Joining in the institution 29/01/2008

5. Qualifications with Class/Grade

PG M.ScPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET

No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 87. Paper Published 0

51

Page 60: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1. Name of Teaching Staff Dhanraj A. Biradar2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department Physics4. Date of Joining in the institution 09/09/2008

5. Qualifications with Class/Grade

PG M.ScPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET

No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 187. Paper Published

1. Name of Teaching Staff Paled Maheshwari2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Chemistry4. Date of Joining in the institution 15/09/2011

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG M.ScPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 187. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Navarang Manikrao2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Mathematics4. Date of Joining in the institution 06/09/2008

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG M.ScPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 57. Paper Published

1. Name of Teaching Staff Dr. Girija Mangalgatti2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Electronics4. Date of Joining in the institution 21/01/2008

5. Qualifications with Class/Grade

PG M.ScPhD/MPhil PhD, MPhilSLET/NET

No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 57. Paper Published 68. Papers published in Conferences 5

52

Page 61: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1. Name of Teaching Staff Veeresh Rampur2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Electronics4. Date of Joining in the institution 21/01/2008

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG M.ScPhD/MPhil MPhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 77. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Shivanand Sidramappa2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Computer Science4. Date of Joining in the institution 25/07/2006

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MCAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET NET

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 87. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Panditkumar2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Computer Science4. Date of Joining in the institution 03/09/2009

5. Qualifications

PG M.TechPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET

No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 227. Paper Published 08. Papers published in Conferences 09 PhD Guided? Yes/No No10. Projects Guided for PG 50

11. Books Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Ravindrakumar2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Computer Science4. Date of Joining in the institution 03/09/20095. Qualifications with Class/Grade PG MCA

53

Page 62: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

PhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET

No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching

6

7. Paper Published2

8 Projects Guided for PG Students 191. Name of Teaching Staff Rajshree2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department 06/12/20134. Date of Joining in the institution

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MCAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 97. Paper Published 08. Papers published in Conferences 09 PhD Guided? Yes/No 010. Projects Guided for PG Students 5

1. Name of Teaching Staff Dr. Shivakumar Uppe2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department History4. Date of Joining in the institution 12/09/2011

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil PhDSLET/NET Yes

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 177. Paper Published 28. Papers published in Conferences 2

1. Name of Teaching Staff Jayashree S. Prabha2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department History4. Date of Joining in the institution 11/10/2013

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 187. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Suman bai2. Designation Assistant Professor

54

Page 63: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

3. Department History4. Date of Joining in the institution 18/07/2013

5. Qualifications with Class/Grade

PG MAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET

No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 47. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Dr. Devidas Tumkunte2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department Economics4. Date of Joining in the institution 09/09/2009

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil PhDSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 187. Paper Published 48. Papers published in Conferences 49 PhD Guided? Yes/No Yes10. Projects Guided 1

1. Name of Teaching Staff Laxman N.K2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department Economics4. Date of Joining in the institution 08/07/1996

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 187. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Baswaraj Rajole2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Sociology4. Date of Joining in the institution 13/07/2013

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 47. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Kahleel Ahmed55

Page 64: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

2. Designation Physical Instructor3. Department Physical Education4. Date of Joining in the institution 05/07/1991

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG M.P.EdPhD/MPhil NoSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years 33

7. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Patil Ashok2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Political Science4. Date of Joining in the institution 08/07/2005

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG MAPhD/MPhil NoSLET/NET NET

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 117. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Dr. Manohar G2. Designation Assistant Professor3. Department Political Science4. Date of Joining in the institution 09/11/2013

5. Qualifications with Class/Grade

PG MAPhD/MPhil PhDSLET/NET

No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 47. Paper Published 0

1. Name of Teaching Staff Savale Tukaram2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department Commerce4. Date of Joining in the institution 24/07/2006

5. Qualifications with Class/GradePG M.ComPhD/MPhil NoSLET/NET No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 297. Paper Published

56

Page 65: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1. Name of Teaching Staff Gadde Dileep2. Designation Associate Professor3. Department Commerce4. Date of Joining in the institution 10/04/2008

5. Qualifications with Class/Grade

PG M.ComPhD/MPhil M.PhilSLET/NET

No

6. Total Experience in Years Teaching 287. Paper Published

Guest Faculty

SlNo

Name Subject Qualification

1 JAWED KHAN Arabic MA(Arabic), PhD

2SYED IFTEQAR HUSSAIN

Arabic MA(Arabic)

3 HIREMATH PRANESH BOTONY MSc(BOTONY)4 SUNILKUMAR CHEMISTRY MSc(CHEMISTRY)5 DATTATRI CHEMISTRY MSc(CHEMISTRY)6 TAFSEER FATIMA CHEMISTRY MSc(CHEMISTRY)7 AMBIKA CHEMISTRY MSc(CHEMISTRY)8 Sheelavanth CHEMISTRY MSc(CHEMISTRY), PhD

9 JaganathCOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MCom(COMMERCE & MANAGMENT)

10 ShanthkumarCOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MCom(COMMERCE & MANAGMENT)

11 AKKAMAHADEVICOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MCom(COMMERCE & MANAGMENT)

12 GANGADEVICOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MCom(COMMERCE & MANAGMENT)

13 P HIMA BINDUCOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MBA

14 SUNITACOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MCom(COMMERCE & MANAGMENT)

15 GOUTAMCOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MBA, NET/SLET

16 shashidharCOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MCom(COMMERCE & MANAGMENT), PhD

17 Ambrish Veernaik COMMERCE & MBA, NET/SLET57

Page 66: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

MANAGMENT

18 SRIKANTHCOMMERCE & MANAGMENT

MCom(COMMERCE & MANAGMENT)

19 ANITHA. M COMPUTER SCIENCE MCA20 sapna COMPUTER SCIENCE MCA21 UMAKANTH COMPUTER SCIENCE MCA22 savita COMPUTER SCIENCE MSc(COMPUTER SCIENCE)23 MADHAVRAO COMPUTER SCIENCE MCA, NET/SLET24 Tippanna COMPUTER SCIENCE MCA25 CHANDRAKANT ECONOMICS MA(ECONOMICS)26 Basawaraj ECONOMICS MA(ECONOMICS)27 D SHAILAJA ECONOMICS MA(ECONOMICS)28 Harika Patil ECONOMICS MA(ECONOMICS)

29BOKKAL NAGENDRAPPA G

ECONOMICS MA(ECONOMICS), PhD

30 SANTOSHKUMAR ECONOMICS MA(ECONOMICS)31 DHANRAJ ECONOMICS MA(ECONOMICS)

32APARNA.VEERAPPA. AGADI

EDUCATION MEd(Education), NET/SLET

33 NEELESH EDUCATION MEd(Education)34 TABASSUM UNNISA ENGLISH MA(ENGLISH), PhD35 Jyoti HINDI MA(HINDI)

36DEVERSE SHANNODEVI

HINDI MA(HINDI)

37 RAMESH HISTORY MA(HISTORY)38 LAXUMAN HISTORY MA(HISTORY)39 DEVARAJ PATIL HISTORY MA(HISTORY)40 BANDAYYA KANNADA MA(KANNADA), PhD41 VIJAYKUMAR KANNADA MA(KANNADA), NET/SLET42 SIKINDAR KANNADA MA(KANNADA), NET/SLET43 meena gaikwad POLITICAL SCIENCE MA(POLITICAL SCIENCE), PhD44 Jyoti SOCIOLOGY MA(SOCIOLOGY), PhD45 ISMAIL KHAN URDU MA(URDU), PhD, NET/SLET46 ATIYA BEGUM URDU MA(URDU), PhD47 TAHSEEN UNNISA URDU MA(URDU), PhD48 MD. ASIF ZOOLOGY MSc(ZOOLOGY)

Nonteaching Staff

Sl. No Name Designation

58

Page 67: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

1 Lal Ahamad FDA2 Budha Sagar SDA3 Satyasheela SDA4 Jagadevi Typist5 Md. Jafar Attender6 Md. Galib Attender7 Shankar Attender8 Subhash Attender9 Tejamma Peon10 Shain Sultana Peon11 Laxmi Peon12 Subhash Ismail Peon

Students Strength

59

Page 68: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

60

Page 69: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Approval Copy : ORDER NO. ED 20 UGC 74 Bangalore Dated 27 th August 1974

61

Page 70: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

62

Page 71: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Copy of Initially Sanctioned Posts in the Year 1974

63

Page 72: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Inclusion of college under 2(f) of UGC Act, 1956

64

Page 73: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Inclusion of college under Section 12-B of UGC Act, 1956

65

Page 74: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Affiliation copies UG & PG

66

Page 75: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

67

Page 76: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

68

Page 77: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

69

Page 78: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

70

Page 79: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

71

Page 80: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

72

Page 81: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

73

Page 82: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Student opinion about college

74

Page 83: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Student Appraisal of Teacher

75

Page 84: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Edusat Attendance

76

Page 85: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Facilities available in Department of Computer Science

77

Page 86: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Facilities available in Department of Electronics

78

Page 87: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Facilities available in Department of Chemistry79

Page 88: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

SL.NO.

NAME OF THE ARTICLE STOCK REGISTER PAGE NO.

STOCKAS ON 31/03/2013

PURCHASED DURING 2013-14

CONSUMED DURING 2013-14

STOCK AS ON 31/03/2014

1 Bunsen burner 4 10 - - 102 Centrifuge machine, Remi make 8 01 - - 013 Colorimeter, digital,CL223,Elico make 9 01 - - 014 Computer (Desktop- HP make) 10 01 - - 015 Computer table 11 01 - - 016 Conductivity Meter, digital, with cell,

EC-TDS Analyser,CM183, Elico make12 01 - - 01

7 Constant temperature water bath(Serological water bath), M.C.Dalal Make

13 01 - - 01

8 Digital weighing balance (10 mg-300 g),Wenser make

16 01 - - 01

9 Electric Bunsen burner, with regulator,M.C.Dalal Make

21 02 - - 02

10 Hot air blower 32 01 - - 0111 Muffle furnace 39 01 - - 0112 PH meter, digital, with electrode, LI 615,

Elico make46 01 - - 01

13 Potentiometer (PH meter), digital, with electrode, LI 120, Elico make

47 01 - - 01

14 Printer (Panasonic make -MFP) 48 01 - - 0115 Reagent bottles –Narrow mouth, 250 ml capacity 54 196 - 02 19416 Reagent bottles-Wide mouth, 250 ml capacity 55 97 - 01 9617 Refrigerator (L.G. make) 56 01 - - 0118 Rotary flask shaker , 36 flag, M.C.Dalal Make 57 01 - - 0119 Rough balance, 2 kg capacity, Gupta make 58 01 - - 0120 Silica crucible, 50 ml capacity 62 12 - - 1221 Spectrophotometer, single beam,

MINI SPEC SL 171, Elico make63 01 - - 01

22 Stop watch, mechanical,1/10 sec, Racer make 64 10 - - 1023 Tripod stand 69 06 - - 0623 UPS (V-Guard , 600VA) 74 01 - - 0125 Water bath (simple copper tray) 84 10 - - 10

80

Page 89: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

Facilities available in Department of Zoology

Sl. No Name of the Equipment Quantity1 Binoculars 22 Binocular microscope 13 Digital Balance 24 Microscope with mechanical stage 105 Egg incubator 50 egg capacity 16 Auto clave 17 Canon Digital Camera EOS 18 Canon EF 100-400 LIS USM 19 Canon Power shot SX 150 15 With

4GB+Case+Charger1

10 Desktop Computer 111 Panasonic MFP 112 Refrigerator 1

Facilities available in Department of Botany

Sl. No Name of the Equipment Quantity1 Binocular microscope 12 Digital Balance 23 Microscope with mechanical stage 104 Canon Power shot SX 150 15 With

4GB+Case+Charger1

5 Desktop Computer 16 Panasonic MFP 17 Refrigerator 1

81

Page 90: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal

List of Ph.D. holders Sl.

No.Name Department

1 Dr K Chunnulal Kannada

2 Dr Tumkunte Devidas Economics

3 Dr. Shivakumar V Uppe History

4 Dr. Suryakant Chidre Mathematics

5 Dr Sharnappa S M Commerce

6 Dr. Sanjeeva Reddy Modse Zoology

7 Dr. Girija Mangalgatti Electronics

7 Dr. Manohar G Political Science

List of Teachers who are pursuing Ph.D.Sl.

No.Name Department

1 Jayashree S. Prabha History

2 Patil Shrikant Kanndad

3 Raghunanda B Physics

4 Navrand M Mathematics

5 C. V. Reddy Chemistry

6 Veeresh Rampur Electronics

7 Pandit Kumar Computer Science

8 Ravindrakumar Computer Science

82

Page 91: RUSA Institutional Development Proposal