21
Rural Development Rural Development Department Department Performance Review Performance Review 2011-2012 2011-2012

Rural Development Department Performance Review 2011-2012

  • Upload
    sunee

  • View
    21

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Rural Development Department Performance Review 2011-2012. Key Result Area #1: Customers. Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program. Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program. Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program. Area 1.2 Strengthen Partnerships with Private Sector. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Rural Development DepartmentRural Development DepartmentPerformance Review Performance Review

2011-20122011-2012

Page 2: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Key Result Area #1: Customers

Page 3: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program

2011 2012KRI 1.1.1 Total Learning Activities 15 9

a. Training Courses 12 7

a.1 Core Courses 2 3

a.2. Customized Courses 10 4

b. Seminars and Workshops 1 0

c. Structured Learning Visits 2 2

d. Forum/Conferences/Meetings 0 0

Page 4: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program

2011 2012KRI 1.1.2 Total Participants 294 195

Page 5: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program

2011 2012KRI 1.1.3 Application of Skills and Knowledge

a. Action plans

- Effective Facilitation and Com Skills 87% (13:15)

- Actively Shaping Rural Development through LRED (Phase I) 62% (15:24)

- Postharvest 96% (24:25)

- Agriculture VC 21% (6:28)

KRI 1.1.4 Participant Satisfaction

a. Overall rating 4.46 4.23

Page 6: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 1.2 Strengthen Partnerships with Private Sector

2011 2012KRI 1.2.1 Partnership with private sector and quasi-governmental organizations% of participants from private and

quasi-governmental orgsa. Government 231 (79%) 180 (92%)

b. Private 63 (21%) 15 (8%)KRI 1.2.2 No. of private organizations in joint-activities with MI

1 5

(Betagro)(Betagro, CM

Fresh Milk, Raming Tea, CP,

Sriviroj)

Page 7: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 1.3 Enhance Local Partners’ Abilities in Delivering MI Programs

2011 2012KRI 1.3.1 No. of local partners co-designing and implementing RDP activities

2 6(Betagro+SHDP) (YC+NAFRI)

KRI 1.3.2 Local partners’ satisfaction on MI TA

No means of verification

No means of verification

KRI 1.3.3 No. of MI activity localized and delivered in local language3 3

(PM&E, SLV-Rice VC, SLV-Regional RD

Planning)

(FMMP, SLV Farming System,

SLV cabbage)

Page 8: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 1.4 Policy Research and Recommendations

2011 2012KRI 1.4.1 No. of research conducted by in-house researchers

2 1

(Cabbage+CF) (Cross-border CF along NSEC)

KRI 1.4.2 No. of policy dialogue/forum organized

0 0

KRI 1.4.3 No. of participants in dialogues0 0

KRI 1.4.3 No. of policy briefs submitted to decision-makers1 0

Cross-Border Contract Farming in Lao PDR: An

Institutional Choice under Constraints

Page 9: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 1.5 Consultancy Services

2011 2012KRI 1.5.1 No. of consultancy services commissioned by clients

0 1(FMMP)

KRI 1.5.2 Clients’ satisfaction

N/A No means of verification

Page 10: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 1.6 In-country Program

2011 2012KRI 1.6.1 No. of MI programs conducted off-MI headquarters

2 3

(PM&E, IWRM #6) (FMMP, IWRM #7, SLV Cabbage)

Page 11: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Key Result Area #2: Process and Growth

Page 12: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

2011 2012KRI 2.1.1 No. of active strategic alliances 9 6

(ADB, GIZ, MRC, NZAP, Israel, Singapore, TICA,

DIC, SHDP)

(NZAP, ADB, MRC, SDC, TICA, NAFRI)

a. Regional partners 4 4

b. National partners 5 2(Singapore, Israel, TICA, DIC, SHDP) (TICA, NAFRI)

KRI 2.1.2 No. of project activities conducted in collaboration with national and regional partners

15 9 (+ 6)

Area 2.1 Create Strategic Alliance with Regional and National Partners

Page 13: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

2011 2012KRI 2.2.1 No. of CLMV and China professional staff representation against Thais

5:2 3:3

a. CLMV and China Van, Ouee, Sopheak, Somountha, KV

Ouee, KV, Chanroat

b. Thais Nue, NIkhom Nue, Nikhom, Aryuwath

No. of non-GMS against GMS staff 2:7 1:6

a. Non-GMS Tess, Bill Tess

b. GMS As above As above

KRI 2.2.2 No. of in-house experts/ trainers 1 2

KRI 2.2.5 No. of associate consultants or visiting faculty 0 0

Area 2.2 Enhance MI Human Resource Capacity

Page 14: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Key Result Area #3: Finance

Key Result Area #3: Finance

Page 15: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 3.2 GMS Contribution

2011 2012KRI 3.2.2 No. of MI activities funded/ partially funded by GMS countries

2 1(PH, AVC) (GAP)

KRI 3.2.3 % of participants of MI core programs sponsored/ partially sponsored by GMS countries

2% 1.5%

a. Partial scholarship (3+3) 3

a. Total participants 294 195

Page 16: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Area 3.3 Multi-year Funded Program

2011 2012KRI 3.3.1 No. of multi-year funded programs (activities?) Ratio of multi-year funded programs vis one-off programs

0:15 3:9

a. Multi-year funded programs 0 3(GAP, YC, SLV

cabbage)

b. One-off programs 15 9 KRI 3.3.3 No. of donors for multi-

year programs 0 1

(NZAP)

Page 17: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Thank youThank you

Q & AQ & A

Page 18: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

RD Specific Projects

Page 19: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Table RD PR. 1Transnational Agricultural Value Chains and

Promotion on Economic Corridors (2011-2013)

2011 20121. Regional training courses 1 -

2. Workshops - -

3. No. of participants 28 -

4. Research - -

5. Collaborating Partners TICASingapore

6. Funding 70,000

Page 20: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Table RD PR. 2Postharvest Management System: Sharing

Experiences and Best Practices of Israel and Thailand (2011-2013)

2011 20121. Training courses 1 0

a. General modular training 1 0

b. TOT - 0

2. Research - -

3. Participants (exp 75) 25 0

4. Collaborating Partners TICAIsrael-Embassy

6. Funding ?? 0

Page 21: Rural Development  Department Performance Review  2011-2012

Table RD PR. 3GMS Youth Camp on Transnational Production Chain

(2011-2015)

2011 20121. Youth Camp 1 1

2. Participants (exp 150) 22 40

3. Local Partner Beneficiaries5 Colleges in

Laos and Vietnam

4 Universities in CLMV

4. Collaborating Partners Betagro

Betagro, CP, Chiangmai

Fresh Milk, Raming Tea,

Sriviroj

6. Funding ?? 0