32
Tax Bulletin August 2012

Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

ITAD Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for services outside the Philippines

Citation preview

Page 1: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

1

Tax Bulletin August 2012

Page 2: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

2 Tax Bulletin

HighlightsBIR Rulings

• PaymentstoaforeigncorporationforservicesperformedentirelyoutsidethePhilippinesareexemptfromincometaxandvalue-addedtax(VAT).(Page 4)

• DividendspaidbyadomesticcorporationtoanAustraliancorporationaresubjecttothe15%finalwithholdingtax(FWT)underSection28(B)(5)(b)oftheTaxCode.(Page 4)

• IncomederivedfrominvestmentsinthePhilippinesbyforeigngovernmentsisexemptfromincometaxand,consequently,fromwithholdingtax.(Page 5)

• Anupstreammergerwherethesurvivingparentcompanywillnotissuesharesinexchangefortheassetsoftheabsorbedsubsidiaryisnotconsideredatax-freemergerunderSection40(C)(2)oftheTaxCode.(Page 5)

• InatransactionwheretwopersonsexchangedsharesofstockintwocompaniesforsharesofstockinathirdcorporationinseparateDeedsofAssignment,asaresultofwhichthefirstpersongainscontrolof58.15%,andthesecondpersongainscontrolof24.33%,ofthevotingstockofthetransferee-corporation,onlythetransferofthefirstpersonwillbeconsideredatax-freeexchangeunderSection40(C)(2)oftheTaxCode.(Page 6)

BIR Issuances

• RevenueRegulations(RR)No.11-2012amendsSection3ofRRNo.1-2011onexemptionfromdocumentarystamptax(DST)ofremittancesofOverseasContractWorkers(OCWs)orOverseasFilipinoWorkers(OFWs).(Page 7)

• RevenueMemorandumCircular(RMC)No.34-2012clarifiesthetaximplicationsofintegratingtheDomesticPassengerServiceCharge(DPSC)atthepointofsaleofairlinetickets,andprescribesrulesfortheinvoicingandrecordingoftheDPSCinthebooksofairlinecompaniesandairportauthorities.(Page 8)

• RMCNo.35-2012clarifiesthetaxabilityofclubsorganizedandoperatedexclusivelyforpleasure,recreation,andothernon-profitpurposes.(Page 9)

• RMCNo.36-2012clarifieswhetherdocumentsmentionedinSection199oftheTaxCode,asamendedbyRepublicAct(RA)No.9243,aresubjecttotheP15.00DSTprescribedinSection188oftheTaxCode.(Page 10)

• RMCNo.37-2012clarifiesSection11ofRRNo.06-08bymakingitclearthataCertificateAuthorizingRegistration(CAR)isstillnecessarybeforesharesofstocknottradedinthestockexchangemaybetransferred.(Page 10)

• RMCNo.38-2012furtherclarifiesinQuestionandAnswerformattheprovisionsofRRNo.7-2010,asamendedbyRRNo.8-2010,implementingthetaxprivilegesgrantedunderRANo.9994,otherwiseknownasthe“ExpandedSeniorCitizensActof2010.”(Page 11)

• RMCNo.39-2012mandatesthewithholdingofincometaxonbackwages,allowances,andbenefitsreceivedbyemployeesthroughgarnishmentofdebtsorcreditspursuanttoalabordisputeaward.(Page 14)

Page 3: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

3

• RMCNo.40-2012prescribesaprescriptiveperiodforrulingsissuedpursuanttoSection40(C)(2)oftheTaxCode.(Page 15)

• RMCNo.47-2012prescribestherulesanddeadlinesforthefilingofapplicationsforenrollmentintheVATTaxCreditCertificate(TCC)MonetizationProgram,pursuanttotheDepartmentofFinance(DOF),DepartmentofBudgetandManagement(DBM)andBIRJointCircularNo.2-2012datedMay31,2012.(Page 15)

BOC Issuances

• CustomsAdministrativeOrder(CAO)No.1-2012establishestheAuthorizedEconomicOperator(AEO)Programforexporters.(Page 16)

• CustomsMemorandumOrder(CMO)No.9-2012requirespriorapprovalfromtheCommissionerofCustomsortheDeputyCommissionerfortheManagementInformationSystemandTechnologyGroup(MISTG)forthemanualprocessingofimportentriesinordertoeffecttheclearanceandreleaseofimportedgoods.(Page 18)

PSE Issuance

• PhilippineStockExchange(PSE)MemorandumCNNo.2012-0046remindstheinvestingpublicoftheeffectsofthefailureoflistedcompaniestocomplywiththeminimumpublicownership(MPO)requirementbyDecember31,2012.(Page 19)

SEC Issuances

• SECMemorandumCircular(MC)No.6dispenseswithsomerequirementsinsomeregistrationactivities.(Page 19)

• Foracorporationtopurchase,acquireorownlandinthePhilippines,atleast60%ofthetotalcapitalstockofthecorporationmustbewholly-ownedbyFilipinocitizens.(Page 20)

• AcorporationneedstoamenditsArticlesofIncorporation(AOI)toreflectthechangeofaddressfromonebuildingtoanother,evenifthesecondbuildingiswithinthesamecityormunicipality.(Page 21)

• Indeterminingthecitizenshipofsharesbeingheldintrust,thenationalityofboththetrusteeandthebeneficiaryshouldbeconsidered.(Page 21)

BSP Issuances

• CircularNo.762amendstheregulationsonDepositsforStockSubscriptionsofbanks/quasi-banks.(Page 22)

• CircularNo.763providesforregulatoryrelieftobanksunderrehabilitationprogram.(Page 25)

• CircularNo.764prescribestheRevisedOutsourcingFrameworkforNon-BankFinancialInstitutions(NBFIs).(Page 25)

• CircularNo.765prescribestheRevisedOutsourcingFrameworkforBanks.(Page 26)

Page 4: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

4 Tax Bulletin

• CircularNo.766prescribestheGuidelinesinStrengtheningCorporateGovernanceandRiskManagementPracticesonTrust,OtherFiduciaryBusiness,andInvestmentManagementActivities.(Page 27)

Court Decision

• Afterreceivinganoticeofassessment,ataxpayermayfilewithin60daysawrittenprotestwiththelocaltreasurer,whichshalldecideonitwithin60days.ThetaxpayercanmakeanappealtotheRegionalTimeCourt(RTC)within30daysfromreceivingthedenialoftheprotest,orfromthelapseofthe60-dayperiodtodecideontheprotest.Thereafter,thetaxpayercanappealthedecisionoftheRTCtotheCourtofTaxAppeals(CTA)within30daysafterreceivingthedecision.(Page 29)

BIR Rulings

BIR Ruling No. 458-2012 dated July 10, 2012

Facts:

BCo.,anon-residentSingaporeancorporation,renderedservicesforFCo.,adomesticcorporation.TheseserviceswereperformedbyBCo.entirelyinIndonesia.FCo.paidservicefeestoBCo.

Issue:

AretheservicefeespaidbyFCo.toBCo.subjecttoPhilippineincometaxandVAT?

Ruling:

1. No.UnderSection23(F)oftheTaxCode,anon-residentforeigncorporationistaxableonlyonincomederivedfromsourceswithinthePhilippines,andunderSection42(A)(3),incomefromservicesisconsideredderivedfromsourceswithinthePhilippinesonlyiftheservicesareperformedinthePhilippines.Hence,incomefromservicesperformedbyanon-residentforeigncorporationentirelyoutsidethePhilippinesisexemptfromPhilippineincometax.

2. No.UnderSection108(A)oftheTaxCode,paymentsforservicesaresubjecttoVATonlyiftheservicesareperformedinthePhilippines.

BIR Ruling No. 465-2012 dated July 17, 2012

Facts:

PCo.declaredcashdividendstoitsstockholderswhichincludeDCo.,anon-residentAustraliancorporation.UnderAustraliantaxlaws,foreigndividendsreceivedinAustraliaareexemptfromincometax.

Issue:

ArethecashdividendspaidbyPCo.toDCo.subjecttothe15%FWTunderSection28(B)(5)(b)oftheTaxCode?

PaymentstoaforeigncorporationforservicesperformedentirelyoutsidethePhilippinesareexemptfromincometaxandVAT.

DividendspaidbyadomesticcorporationtoanAustraliancorporationaresubjecttothe15%FWTunderSection28(B)(5)(b)oftheTaxCode.

Page 5: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

5

Ruling:

Yes.UnderSection28(B)(5)(b)oftheTaxCode,cashand/orpropertydividendsreceivedbyanon-residentforeigncorporationfromadomesticcorporationshallbesubjecttoa15%FWTonthedividendsreceived,subjecttotheconditionthatthecountryinwhichthenon-residentforeigncorporationisdomiciledshallallowacreditagainstthetaxduefromthenon-residentforeigncorporationtaxesdeemedtohavebeenpaidinthePhilippinesequivalentto15%ofthedividend.Thepreferential15%FWTrateappliessinceAustralianlawstreatforeigndividendsreceivedinAustraliaasexemptfromincometax.

However,thefollowingrequirementsmustbecompliedwithwithinareasonabletimepursuanttoRMCNo.80-91:

a) ShowthatthedividendsreceivedbyDCo.fromPCo.werenotamongtheitemsconsideredinarrivingattheincometaxduefromDCo;

b) PresenttheincometaxreturnofDCo.forthetaxableyearwhenthesubjectdividendswerereceived;and

c) SubmitanyauthenticateddocumentsshowingthattheAustralianGovernmentdidnotimposeanytaxonthesubjectdividends.

BIR Ruling No. 495-2012 dated July 31, 2012

Facts:

KCo.,anautonomousgovernmentbodyresponsibleforthemanagementandadministrationofsomeofKuwait’sfunds,derivesincomefromitsinvestmentsinthePhilippinessuchasgovernmentbonds,corporatebondsandbankdeposits.

Issue:

IstheincomederivedbyKCo.frominvestmentsinthePhilippinesexemptfromPhilippineincometax?

Ruling:

Yes.UnderSection32(B)(7)(a)(i)oftheTaxCode,incomederivedbyforeigngovernmentsfrominvestmentsinthePhilippinesisexemptfromincometaxand,consequently,fromwithholdingtax.

BIR Ruling No. 508-2012 dated August 3, 2012

Facts:

ACo.,adomesticcorporation,effectedamergerwithitswholly-ownedsubsidiary,BCo.,anotherdomesticcorporation,whereACo.willbethesurvivingcorporation.Asaresultofthemerger,BCo.willtransferitsassetstoACo.However,sinceBCo.isawholly-ownedsubsidiaryofACo.,ACo.willnolongerissueanysharesofstockinconsiderationfortheassetstransferredbyBCo.pursuanttothemerger.

Issue:

IsthemergerbetweenACo.andBCo.consideredatax-freemergerunderSection40(C)(2)oftheTaxCode?

IncomederivedfrominvestmentsinthePhilippinesbyforeigngovernmentsisexemptfromincometaxand,consequently,fromwithholdingtax.

Anupstreammergerwherethesurvivingparentcompanywillnotissuesharesinexchangefortheassetsoftheabsorbedsubsidiaryisnotconsideredatax-freemergerunderSection40(C)(2)oftheTaxCode.

Page 6: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

6 Tax Bulletin

Ruling:

No.Thereorganizationisanupstreammergerbetweenaparentcompanyandasubsidiary,wheretheparentcompanywillnotbeissuinganysharestothesubsidiaryinexchangefortheassetstobetransferredasaresultofthemerger.Ineffect,thetransferpartakesofthenatureofadonationmadebyasubsidiarytoitsparentcompany,contrarytowhatiscontemplatedinSection40(C)(2)oftheTaxCode.Inthesamemanner,theintendedmergeralsohastheeffectofdissolvingandliquidatingthesubsidiarywithoutpaymentofcorrespondingtaxes.

[Editor’s Note: This ruling revokes previous rulings such as BIR Ruling [DA-(S40M-001) 007-09] dated January 13, 2009, BIR Ruling [DA-(S40-M018) 436-08] dated November 14, 2008 and BIR Ruling [DA-(S40M-014) 387-08] dated November 4, 2008. In these rulings, the BIR ruled that the non-issuance of shares by the surviving corporation to the absorbed corporations does not affect the tax-free nature of the mergers since the mergers were between or among affiliated companies ultimately owned by the same parent, or between a parent and a subsidiary (with the parent as the surviving corporation). In these rulings, the BIR also ruled that the transfer of properties as a consequence of mergers is not subject to donor’s tax as there is no intention to donate on the part of any of the parties to the mergers, and the mergers were undertaken for bona fide business purposes.]

BIR Ruling No. 515-2012 dated August 3, 2012

Facts:

Mr.AownssharesinACo.,whileMr.BownssharesinBCo.Mr.AandMr.BexecutedseparateDeedsofAssignmenttotransfertheirrespectivesharesinACo.andBCo.infavorofXCo.,bothinexchangeforXCo.shares.Asaresultofthetransfer,Mr.AandMr.BwillgaincontrolofXCo.byowning58.15%and24.33%,respectively,ofthetotalvotingstockofXCo.

Issues:

1. IsthetransferbyMr.AofhissharesinACo.toXCo.exemptfromCGTandDST?

2. IsthetransferbyMr.BofhissharesinBCo.toXCo.exemptfromCGTandDST?

Ruling:

1. Yes.UnderSection40(C)(2)and6(c)oftheTaxCode,nogainorlossshallberecognizedifpropertyistransferredtoacorporationbyaperson,inexchangeforstockinsuchcorporation,asaresultofwhichsaidperson,aloneortogetherwithothers,notexceedingfourpersons,gainscontrolofsaidcorporation.Theterm“control”shallmeanownershipofatleast51%ofthetotalvotingsharesinthecorporation.

Indeterminingthe51%stockownership,onlythosepersonswhotransferredpropertyforstockinthesametransactionmaybecounteduptoamaximumoffive.Inshort,combiningallthesharestobereceivedbythetransferors,thesameshouldtotaltoatleast51%ofthevotingpowerofallclassesentitledtovote.

WiththeexchangeofsharesofMr.Aalone,healreadygainscontrolofXCo.byacquiring58.15%ofitsvotingshares.Hence,nogainorlossshall

InatransactionwheretwopersonsexchangedsharesofstockintwocompaniesforsharesofstockinathirdcorporationinseparateDeedsofAssignment,asaresultofwhichthefirstpersongainscontrolof58.15%,andthesecondpersongainscontrolof24.33%,ofthevotingstockofthetransferee-corporation,onlythetransferofthefirstpersonwillbeconsideredatax-freeexchangeunderSection40(C)(2)oftheTaxCode.

Page 7: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

7

berecognizedwithrespecttothetransferbyMr.AofhisACo.sharesinexchangeforsharesofstockofXCo.ThereisnoneedtocombineMr.A’sshareswiththesharesofMr.BtodetermineMr.A’scompliancewiththe51%stockownership.

However,thefollowingrequirementsmustbecompliedwith:

A. Mr.Amustfilewithhisincometaxreturnforthetaxableyearinwhichtheexchangetransactionwasconsummatedacompletestatementofallfactspertinenttotheexchange,including:

1. Adescriptionofthepropertieshetransferred,orhisinterestinsuchproperties,withastatementoftheoriginalacquisitioncost/adjustmentcostbasisorotherbasisatthetimeoftransfer;

2. Thekindsofstockreceivedandpreferences,ifany;3. Thenumberofsharesofeachclassreceived;and4. Thefairmarketvaluepershareofeachclassatthedateofthe

exchange.

B. XCo.mustfilealongwithitsincometaxreturnforthesametaxableyearthefollowing:

1. Acompletedescriptionofthepropertiesreceivedfromthetransferor;

2. Astatementoforiginalacquisitioncostorotherbasisofthepropertiesinthehandsofthetransferorandtheadjustedcostbasisthereofatthetimeofthetransfer;and

3. Informationwithrespecttothecapitalstockofthecorporationincluding:

i. Totalissuedandoutstandingcapitalstockimmediatelypriortoandimmediatelyaftertheexchange;

ii. Classesofstockandnumberofsharesissuedtothetransferorintheexchange;and

iii. Thefairmarketvalueasofthedateoftheexchangeofthecapitalstockissuedtothetransferor.

Lastly,within90daysfromreceiptoftheBIRRuling,thepartiestothetransactionmustsubmitacertifiedtruecopyofthedulyannotatedcertificatesofstockinrespectofthetransferredshares.

2. No.ThetransferbyMr.B,resultinginownershipofonly24.33%ofthetotalvotingsharesinXCo.,shallbetreatedasaseparatetransfersubjecttoCGTandDST.

[Editor’s Note: Section 40(C)(2) allows non-recognition of gain or loss on property-for-share transfers by transferors not exceeding five, as long as the 51% control requirement is met. Since up to five transferors are allowed to not recognize gain or loss on these exchanges, it stands to reason that the shares of the transferee-corporation received by the transferors not exceeding five, would be aggregated to determine compliance with the 51% control requirement. While this particular ruling did not specifically say so, it is possible that the BIR treated the transfer by Mr. B as a transfer separate from the transfer by Mr. A, and therefore did not add the X Co. shares received by Mr. B to the X Co. shares received by Mr. A as part of the 51% control requirement, because the transfers were effected in separate Deeds of Assignment.)

Page 8: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

8 Tax Bulletin

BIR Issuances

Revenue Regulations No. 11-2012 dated August 17, 2012

• Section3ofRRNo.1-2011isamendedtoreadasfollows:

“Section3.TaxTreatment-xxx

C) OtherTaxesandFees:-xxx

TheremittancesofallOCWsorOFWs,uponshowingoftheOverseasExitClearance(OEC),validOverseasWorkersWelfareAdministration(OWWA)MembershipCertificate,or electronic receipt (e-receipt) issued by POEA,bytheOCWsorOFWbeneficiaryorrecipient,shallbeexemptfromthepaymentofdocumentarystamptax(DST)asimposedunderSection181oftheNationalInternalRevenueCodeof1997,asamended.Forthispurpose,inadditiontotheoriginalcopy,aduplicatecopyoracertifiedtruecopyofthevalidproofofentitlementreferredtoaboveshallbesecuredbytheOCWorOFWfromthePOEAorOWWA,whichshallbeheldandusedbyhis/herbeneficiaryintheavailmentoftheDSTexemption.

IncaseofOCWsorOFWswhoseremittancesaresentthroughthebankingsystem,creditedtobeneficiariesorrecipient’saccountinthePhilippinesandwithdrawnthroughanautomatictellermachine(ATM),or sent through non-bank money transfer agents,itshallbetheresponsibilityoftheOCWorOFWtoshowthevalidproofofentitlementwhenmakingarrangementforhis/herremittancetransfers.

xxx”

• Localbanksandnon-bankmoneytransferagentsarerequiredtodocumentremittancesmadebyOCWsorOFWsfollowingtheformatbelow,formonitoringpurposes:

OFW Remittances for the First Quarter of 2012

(ExemptfromDSTimposedunderSec.181oftheNIRC,asamended,perR.A.No.10022)

NameofOCW/OFW

Sender

NameofRecipient

AmountinPesoorPesoEquivalent

ProofofEntitlement

toDSTexemption(i.e.,OEC,e-receipt,orOWWA

MembershipCertificate

DateofTransaction

RemittanceDate

EncashmentDate

1.JuandelaCruz

JanedelaCruz

20,000 **** Feb1,2012 Feb1,2012

****[IndicateControlNumberprovidedbythePOEA]

• Theaboveinformationisrequiredtobefurnished,onaquarterlybasis,totheRevenueDistrictOffice(RDO)orAuditDivisionundertheLargeTaxpayersService(LTS)wherethebanksandnon-bankmoneytransferagentsareregistered,tobesubmittedonorbeforethe20thdayfollowingthecloseofthequarter.

RRNo.11-2012amendsSection3ofRRNo.1-2011onexemptionfromDSTofremittancesofOCWsorOFWs.

Page 9: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

9

• TheseRegulationsshalltakeeffectafter15daysfromdateofpublicationinanewspaperofgeneralcirculation.

(Editor’s Note: RR No. 11-2012 was published in the ManilaBulletin on August 24, 2012.)

Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 34-2012 dated July 13, 2012

Background

• InaMemorandumofAgreementdatedMay17,2012,theManilaInternationalAirportAuthority(MIAA)andthedomesticairlinecompanieshaveagreedthattheDPSC,whichusedtobecollectedbyMIAAfromdepartingpassengersthroughcounterslocatedintheairport,shallbeintegratedwiththesaleofairlinetickets.

• TheDPSCshallbecollectedfromthepassengersatthetimetheypurchaseairlineticketsfromairlinecompaniesorgeneralsalesagents/travelagents.

• TheDPSCshallthenberemittedtotheMIAAwhichshall,inturn,bechargedservicefeesbytheairlinecompaniesascompensationforcollectingtheDPSConbehalfoftheMIAA.

Collection of the DPSC from passengers

• TheairlinecompanyshallcollecttheDPSCfromthepassengersandshallincludetheDPSCintheofficialreceipt(OR)tobeissuedbytheairlinecompanyfortheairlineticketofthepassenger.

• TheDPSCshallconsistoftheShareofAirportAuthority,whichshallbesubjecttoa12%VAT,andtheAviationSecurityFee(ASF),whichshallbeVAT-exempt.

►• TheVATreceipttobeissuedbytheairlinecompaniesshouldreflecttheVAT-taxableandVAT-exemptcomponentsoftheDPSC.

• TheVATcomponentoftheDPSCshouldbeincludedinthetotalVAT,whichwillincludetheVATontheairlineticket.

• TheShareofAirportAuthorityandtheASFmaybereportedinthefinancialstatementsoftheairlinecompanyasotherincome/expense.

Payment of DPSC by airline company to airport authority

►• TheDPSCcollectedbytheairlinecompanyshallbepaidtotheairportauthority,whichshallthenissueanORtotheairlinecompany,indicatingthefullamountoftheDPSCanditsVAT-taxableandVAT-exemptcomponents.

►• TheDPSCshallnotformpartofthegrossreceiptsoftheairportauthorityinitsdeterminationofcreditablewithholdingtaxesdue.

Payment of Service Fees by airport authority to airline company

• Theservicefeespaidbytheairportauthoritytoairlinecompaniesshallbesubjecttoa5%withholdingVATand2%expandedwithholdingtaxongrosspayments.

• Uponpaymentoftheservicefees,theairlinecompanyshallissueaVATOR.

• ThiscircularshalltakeeffectonAugust1,2012.

RMCNo.34-2012clarifiesthetaximplicationsofintegratingtheDomesticPassengerServiceCharge(DPSC)atthepointofsaleofairlinetickets,andprescribesrulesfortheinvoicingandrecordingoftheDPSCinthebooksofairlinecompaniesandairportauthorities.

Page 10: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

10 Tax Bulletin

Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 35-2012 dated August 3, 2012

• Incomefromwhateversource,includingbutnotlimitedtomembershipfees,assessmentdues,rentalincomeandservicefees,ofclubsorganizedandoperatedexclusivelyforpleasure,recreation,andothernon-profitpurposes,aresubjecttoincometax.

TheprovisionintheTaxCodeof1977,whichgrantedincometaxexemptiontorecreationalclubs,wasomittedinthecurrentlistoftax-exemptcorporationsundertheTaxCodeof1997,asamended.

• Grossreceiptsofrecreationalclubs,includingbutnotlimitedtomembershipfees,assessmentdues,rentalincomeandservicefees,aresubjecttoVAT.

Section105oftheTaxCodeprovidesthatanypersonwho,inthecourseoftradeorbusiness,sells,barters,exchanges,leasesgoodsorproperties,rendersservices,andanypersonwhoimportsgoods,shallbesubjecttoVAT.Thephrase“inthecourseoftradeorbusiness”meanstheregularconductorpursuitofacommercialoraneconomicactivity,includingtransactionsincidentalthereto,byanypersonregardlessofwhetherthepersonengagedthereinisanon-stock,non-profitprivateorganization.Thus,evenanon-stock,non-profitorganizationorgovernmententityisliabletopayVATonthesaleofgoodsorservices.ThisconclusionwasalsoaffirmedbytheSupremeCourtinCommissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Court of Appeals and Commonwealth Management and Services Corporation, G. R. No. 125355, March 30, 2000.

Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 36-2012 dated August 3, 2012

►• Onlyinstruments,documentsandpapersexpresslyenumeratedinSection199oftheTaxCodeareexemptfromDST.

►• ThefollowingcertificatesandothernecessarydocumentsissuedbytheConstructionIndustryAuthorityofthePhilippinesaresubjecttotheP15.00DSTimposedinSection188oftheTaxCode:

1. CertificateofRegistrationofOverseasContractors;2. CertificateofRenewalofRegistrationofOverseasContractors;3. Contractor’sLicense(Original);4. Certificateofwhetheracertaincontractorislicensed;5. Certifiedtruecopiesoflicensecertificates;6. Certifiedtruecopiesofdocuments,suchasAffidavitofUndertakingof

SustainingTechnicalEmployee(STE)andCurriculumVitaeofSTE;7. CertificateofAccreditationofArbitrators;and8. CasedocumentstobeusedtosupportpetitionorappealintheCourtof

Appeals.

Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 37-2012 dated August 3, 2012

►• Section11ofRRNo.06-08providesthatnosale,exchange,transferorsimilartransactionintendedtoconveyownershipof,ortitleto,anyshareofstockshallberegisteredinthebooksofthecorporationunlessthereceiptsofpaymentofthetaxhereinimposedisfiledwith,andrecordedby,thestocktransferagentorsecretaryofthecorporation.

►►• TheaboveprovisionofRRNo.06-08hascreatedconfusiononwhetheraCertificateAuthorizingRegistration(CAR)isstillnecessarybeforesharesofstocknottradedinthestockexchangemaybetransferred.

RMCNo.36-2012clarifieswhetherdocumentsmentionedinSection199oftheTaxCode,asamendedbyRANo.9243,aresubjecttotheP15.00DSTprescribedinSection188oftheTaxCode.

RMCNo.37-2012clarifiesSection11ofRRNo.06-08bymakingitclearthataCARisstillnecessarybeforesharesofstocknottradedinthestockexchangemaybetransferred.

RMCNo.35-2012clarifiesthetaxabilityofclubsorganizedandoperatedexclusivelyforpleasure,recreation,andothernon-profitpurposes.

Page 11: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

11

►►• Inordertotransferownershipofsharesofstocknottradedinthestockexchange,itisnecessarytosecureaCARpursuanttoRevenueMemorandumOrder(RMO)No.15-03.ThereceiptsofpaymentofthetaxshouldalsobefiledandrecordedbythesecretaryofthecorporationpursuanttoSection11ofRRNo.06-08.

Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 38-2012 dated August 3, 2012

►• Incomputingthe20%discountandtheexemptionfromVAT,theformulais:

TotalBillingAmountless12%VATx20% = SeniorCitizen

No.ofCustomers Discount

Theaboveformulawillapplyifnoindividualizedfooditemcanbeorderedorifthetransactionwiththeseniorcitizenisnotprocessedseparately.Thetotalbillingamountusedinthecomputationofthe20%discountistheamountexclusiveoftheVAT.

►• Forrestaurants,thediscountshallbeforthesaleoffood,drinks,dessertandotherconsumableitemsservedbytheestablishments,includingvaluemealsandpromotionalmeals,offeredfortheconsumptionofthegeneralpublic.Condimentsandsideproductsfallwithintheambitof“otherconsumableitemsservedbytheestablishments.”

►• Innocaseshallthediscountgrantedtoseniorcitizensbelessthan20%.Thereshouldbenofixed,maximumamountorcapwhichwilllimitthediscountbelowthe20%rate.The20%discountshallbegiventogoodspurchasedbyseniorcitizensbasedonthesellingpriceexclusiveofVAT.

►• The20%discountandVATexemptionshallalsoapplytosetmealspurchasedbyseniorcitizens,provided,however,thatthemealshallbelimitedtoasingle-servingmealwithbeverageforanindividualseniorcitizen.

►►• The20%discountshallapplytodine-in,take-outandtake-homeorders(excludingbulkorders)aslongasitistheseniorcitizenhimself/herselfwhoispresentandpersonallyordersandcanshowavalidseniorcitizenidentification(ID)card.Iftheseniorcitizenmerelytakeshometheunfinishedorunconsumeddine-inorder,he/sheshallstillbeentitledtothe20%discount,providedtheleftoverisnotpartofbulkorders.

►►• Ifthegroupofdinersiscomposedofseniorcitizenswhoorderedgroupmealsorfooditemsforsharinginrestaurants,eachseniorcitizenwithavalidseniorcitizen’sIDcardshallbeentitledtothe20%discountandVATexemption.Ifnotalltheseniorcitizenshavetheirvalidseniorcitizen’sIDcards,thevalueofthefoodpurchasedattributabletoseniorcitizenswithseniorcitizen’scardsmaybecomputedusingtheformulaabove.

►►• Bulkordersarenotentitledtothe20%discountandVATexemptionsincetheyarewithinthecontextofpre-contractedorpre-arrangedgroupmealsorpackages.

►►• Mealsprimarilypreparedandintentionallymarketedforchildrenandnotforseniorcitizen’spersonalconsumptionarenotentitledtothe20%discount.

RMCNo.38-2012furtherclarifiesinQuestionandAnswerformattheprovisionsofRRNo.7-2010,asamendedbyRRNo.8-2010,implementingthetaxprivilegesgrantedunderRANo.9994,otherwiseknownasthe“ExpandedSeniorCitizensActof2010”.

Page 12: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

12 Tax Bulletin

►►• TheMostExpensiveMealCombination(MEMC)isanamountcorrespondingtothecombinationofthemostexpensiveandbiggestsingle-servingmealwithbeverageservedinaquickservicerestaurant.TheMEMCisdeemedflexibleandisadjustedaccordinglybyfoodestablishmentstoestimateasinglefoodpurchaseofanindividualseniorcitizen.MEMCisappliedonlytotake-out,take-home,drive-thruanddeliveryorders.

►►• Pasalubongfooditemswhicharesingle-serving/solomealsforthepersonalandexclusiveconsumptionoftheseniorcitizenareentitledtothe20%discountandVATexemption.Otherpasalubongfooditems(e.g.,boxofbiscocho,bottlesofginamos,severalpacketsofmangopreserves)whicharenotforthepersonalandexclusiveconsumptionoftheseniorcitizenarenotentitledtothe20%discountandVATexemption.Thislimitationextendstonoveltyitemsornon-consumablessoldinrestaurants.

►►• Called-inorphoned-inordersareentitledto20%discountandVATexemption.Theyare,likewise,subjecttocertainconditions,i.e.,seniorcitizenIDcardnumbermustbegivenwhilemakingtheorderoverthetelephone;theseniorcitizenIDcardmustalsobepresentedupondeliverytoverifytheidentityoftheseniorcitizenentitledtothe20%discountandVATexemption.

►►• Incaseofcalled-inorphoned-inordersofgroupmeals,thefoodestablishmentsmustdeterminethenumberofseniorcitizenscomprisingthegroup,andthe20%discountshallbecomputedbasedonthevalueofthefoodattributabletothequalifiedseniorcitizens.TheseniorcitizenIDcardnumber/smustbegivenwhilemakingthecalled-inorphoned-inorderandtheIDcard/smustbepresentedupondelivery.

►►• Apurchaseofawholecakeorpizzamaybeconsideredasapurchaseofagroupmealormealforsharing.Ifthewholecakeorpizzapurchasedisgoodfor5personsandthegroupiscomposedof5seniorcitizens,eachwithavalidseniorcitizenIDcard,theyshallbeentitledtothe20%discountortheentirefoodpurchaseshallbeentitledtothe20%discount.Ifthegroupiscomposedofseniorcitizens,butnotallhavetheirvalidseniorcitizenIDcard/s,orcomposedofseniorcitizensandnon-seniorcitizens,thevalueofthecakeorpizzaattributabletothequalifiedseniorcitizen/sshallbecomputedusingtheformulaabove.Iftheseniorcitizenpurchasesasliceofcakeorpersonalservingofcake,heshallbeentitledtothe20%discount.

►►• Thepurchasebyaseniorcitizenofalcoholicbeveragesifservedasasingleservingdrinkisentitledtothe20%discountandVATexemption.Thediscountandexemptionshallnotbegiventopurchases“inbulk”,“inbuckets”,or“incases”.However,alcoholicbeveragespurchasedinabar,cluborcabaretareexemptfromVATbutsubjecttoamusementtaxof18%underSection125oftheTaxCode.Theseniorcitizenmaystillbeentitledtothe20%discountonthepurchaseofthealcoholicdrink,butshallonlybelimitedtoasingleservingofalcoholicdrink.

►• Cigarettes/cigarsarenotfoodoressentialitemsdeemedentitledtothe20%discount.

►• The20%discountandVATexemptionprivilegeshallalsoapplytomedicinespurchasedfromdrugstores,hospitalpharmacies,medicalandopticalclinics,andsimilarestablishments,includingnon-traditionaloutletsdispensingmedicines.

►►• Adeliveryfee/chargenotbilledseparatelyissubjecttothe20%discount.Ifthedeliveryfee/chargeisbilledseparately,itisnotentitledtothe20%discountandissubjecttoVAT.

►►• Tollfeesarenotsubjecttothe20%discount.

Page 13: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

13

►►• Taxifaresaresubjecttothe20%discount.

►►• Inthepurchaseofgoodsandserviceswhichareonpromotionaldiscount,theseniorcitizenshallavailofeitherthepromotionaldiscountorthe20%discount,whicheverishigher.However,thediscountgiventotheseniorcitizenshallinnocasebelessthan20%.ThesaleofgoodsonpromotionaldiscountisstillVAT-exempt.

►►• The20%discountgivenbythebusinessestablishmentsisdeductiblefromtheirgrossincomeduringthesametaxableyearwhenthesaiddiscountsaregiven,andtheinputtaxattributabletotheVAT-exemptsaleisconsideredascostoranexpenseaccountofthebusinessestablishments.BoththediscountandinputVATthataretreatedascostorexpenseaccountsareabsorbedbytheState.

►►• IncaseofbusinessestablishmentswhicharenotsubjecttoVATbuttopercentagetaxbecausetheirgrossannualsales/receiptsdonotreachtheP1,919,500.00thresholdamountunderRRNo.16-2005asamendedbyRRNo.16-2011,seniorcitizensarenotexemptfromthepaymentofthepercentagetax.RANo.9994doesnotincludeexemptionfromthepaymentofpercentagetax.Theexemptiondoesnotcoverotherindirecttaxesthatmaybepassed-onbythesellertotheseniorcitizenbuyer,suchaspercentagetax.Insuchcase,thediscountmustbeonthetotalcostofthegoodsorserviceschargedbytheseller,exclusiveofthetax.

►►• Theamountofsalesthatmustbereportedfortaxpurposesistheundiscountedsellingpriceandnottheamountofsalesnetofdiscount.Thegrosssellingpriceandthesalesdiscountmustbeseparatelyindicatedintheofficialreceiptorsalesinvoiceissuedbytheestablishmentforthesaleofgoodsorservicestotheseniorcitizen.

►►• IfthesellerusesaPointofSaleMachineorCashRegisterMachine,themachinetapeshouldbeabletosegregatetheexemptsalefromthetaxablesale.Ifthemachinesareincapableofsegregation,theyshouldbere-programmedtocomplywiththerequirement.Inthemeantime,amanualinvoice/receiptshallbeissuedbytheseller.

►►• Thesellermayopttoissueaseparateinvoice/receiptonitssaletoseniorcitizens.Theseparateinvoice/receiptwillreflecttheamountofthediscountandthetotalamountpayable.Theword“VAT-ExemptSale”mustbewrittenorprintedprominentlyonthefaceoftheinvoice/receipt.

►►• Thesellermayissueoneinvoice/receiptfortheentiretransactionifthemerchandise/servicewassoldunderasingletransactioncomprisedofasaletoaseniorcitizenandasaletoanon-seniorcitizen,providingforaproperbreakdownoftheexemptsaleandtaxablesale.Theinvoicemustproperlyreflectthediscountontheexemptsale.TheVATdueonthetaxablesalemustbeseparatelybilledintheinvoice/receipt.

►►• Theincomestatementofthesellermustreflectthediscount,notasareductionofsalestoarriveatnetsales,butasadeductionfromitsgrossincome(saleslesscostofsales).Thus,the20%discountshallbetreatedasanecessaryandordinaryexpensedulydeductiblefromthegrossincome,providedthatthesellerdoesnotoptfortheOptionalStandardDeductionduringthetaxablequarter/year.

►►• Theinputtaxattributabletotheexemptsaleshallnotbeallowedasaninputtaxcreditbutmustbetreatedasacostoranexpenseaccountbytheseller.

Page 14: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

14 Tax Bulletin

►• Businessestablishmentsgivingsalesdiscountstoqualifiedseniorcitizensarerequiredtokeepaseparateandaccuraterecordofsales,whichshallincludethenameoftheseniorcitizen-purchaser,OfficeforSeniorCitizensAffairs-ID,grosssales/receipts,salesdiscountsgranted,datesoftransactionsandinvoice/ORnumberforeverysaleortransactiontoseniorcitizen.TheinvoicingrequirementsinSection4.113-1ofRRNo.16-2005mustalsobecompliedwith.

►• Aspecialdiscountof5%oftheregularretailpriceofbasicnecessitiesandprimecommoditiesasdefinedundertheJointDepartmentofAgriculture(DA)andDepartmentofTradeandIndustry(DTI)AdministrativeOrderNo.10-02,Seriesof2010,shallbegrantedtoseniorcitizensontheirpurchases,takingintoaccountthatsaidpurchasesshallbeforthepersonalandexclusiveconsumptionand/orenjoymentoftheSeniorCitizen.

►►• PurchasesofbasicnecessitiesandprimecommoditiesbyseniorcitizensasdefinedunderSection2ofJointDTI-DAAdministrativeOrderNo.10-02,Seriesof2010,arenotexemptfromVAT.

►►• Toiletries,suchastoothpaste,bathsoapandtissuepaperarenotentitledtothe5%specialdiscount.OnlytheitemslistedunderRANo.7581orthePriceActareidentifiedasbasicnecessitiesandprimecommoditiessubjecttothe5%specialdiscount.However,powdered,liquid,barlaundryanddetergentsoapareconsideredbasicnecessitiessubjecttothe5%specialdiscount.

►►• “Maximumpurchaseperweek”meansthatseniorcitizensshallenjoyaspecialdiscountof5%oftheregularretailprice,withoutexceptionfromVAT,ofbasicnecessitiesandprimecommoditiesprovidedundertheJointDTI-DAAdministrativeOrderNo.10-02,providedthatthetotalamountofsaidpurchasesshallnotexceedthemaximumamountpercalendarweek.ThemaximumamountisP1,300.00percalendarweek,aftercombiningsetlimitsunderprimecommoditiesandbasicnecessities,withoutcarryoveroftheunusedamount.

Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 39-2012 dated August 3, 2012

►►• Backwages,allowances,andbenefitsawardedinalabordisputeconstituteremunerationforservicesthattheemployeewouldhaveperformedintheyearwhenactuallyreceived,orduringtheperiodofhisdismissalfromtheservicewhichwassubsequentlyruledasillegal.Theemployeeshouldreportasincomeandpaythecorrespondingincometaxesbyallocatingorspreadinghisbackwages,allowancesandbenefitsthroughtheyearsfromhisseparationuptothefinaldecisionofthecourtawardingthebackwages.Thebackwages,allowancesandbenefitsaresubjecttowithholdingtaxonwages(WTW).

►►►• Ifthejudgmentawardedinalabordisputeisenforcedthroughgarnishmentofdebtsduetotheemployerorothercreditstowhichtheemployerisentitled,thepersonowingsuchdebtsorhavingpossessionorcontrolofsuchcredits(e.g.,banksorotherfinancialinstitutions)wouldnormallyreleaseandpaytheentiregarnishedamounttotheemployee.Asaresult,employerswhoaremandatedtowithholdtaxesonwagescannotwithholdtheappropriatetaxduethereon.

►►►• UnderSection78(D)(1)oftheTaxCodeandSection2.78.4(A)ofRRNo.2-98,asamended,theterm“employer”includespersonshavingcontrolofthepaymentofwagesorsalaries.Inthiscase,thegarnisheesarethepersons

RMCNo.39-2012mandatesthewithholdingofincometaxonbackwages,allowances,andbenefitsreceivedbyemployeesthroughgarnishmentofdebtsorcreditspursuanttoalabordisputeaward.

Page 15: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

15

owingdebtsduetotheemployerorinpossessionorcontrolofcreditstowhichtheemployerisentitled.Accordingly,theyareincontrolofthepaymentofbackwages,allowancesandbenefits,andtheyareauthorizedtodeductandwithholdtheincometaxduefromthebackwages,allowances,andbenefitstobepaidtotheemployees,andare,therefore,liableforsuchdeductions.

►►►• GarnisheesofajudgmentawardinalabordisputeareconstitutedaswithholdingagentswiththedutyofdeductingthecorrespondingWTWduethereonequivalentto5%oftheportionofthejudgmentawardrepresentingthetaxablewages,allowances,andbenefits.

Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 40-2012 dated August 3, 2012

►►►• Section40(C)(2)oftheTaxCodeprovidesforthenon-recognitionofgainorlossin(i)casesofmergersorconsolidations,and(ii)property-for-shareswapswherethetransferor,aloneortogetherwithothersnotexceedingfour,gainscontrolofthetransferee-corporation.

►►►►• RulingsissuedunderSection40(C)(2)ofTaxCodeshallbevalidonlyfor90days,countedfromthedateofthereceiptoftherulingbyanyofthepartiestotheexchangetransaction.Thepropertiesandsharesofstockinvolvedinthetransfershouldbeconveyedtothetransferee/sandtransferor/s,respectively,withinthisperiod.

►►►►• PursuanttoRRNo.18-2001andRMONo.32-2001,aphotocopyoftheTransferCertificateofTitle(TCT)/CondominiumCertificateofTitle(CCT)/ShareofStockthatbearstheannotationofsubstitutedbasisoftherealproperty/sharesofstocktransferred/receivedinconnectionwiththetransaction,dulycertifiedbytheRegisterofDeeds/CorporateSecretary,shouldbesubmittedtotheLawDivision,BIR,7/FNationalOfficeBuilding,Diliman,QuezonCity,alsowithinthe90-dayperiodfromdateofreceiptoftherulingorcertificationbyanyofthepartiestotheexchangetransaction;otherwise,therulingshallbevoidandtheChiefoftheLawDivisionshallreferthecasetotheProsecutionDivisionforappropriateaction.

►►►►• AnyviolationofthisCircularbyanyofthepartiestotheexchangetransaction,orbyanypublicofficeroremployee,shallbesubjecttotheappropriatepenaltiesunderSections269and275oftheTaxCode.

►►►►• RevenueDistrictOfficesaredirectednottohonorsuchrulingsbeyond90dayscountedfromthedateofreceiptoftherulingbyanyofthepartiestotheexchangetransaction,unlessanextensionofperiodisgrantedbytheCommissionerinmeritoriouscases.

Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 47-2012 dated August 14, 2012

►►►►• ThedeadlineforfilingapplicationsforVATTCCMonetizationshallbeasfollows:

Type of TCC Filing Period

ForrevalidatedandunexpiredTCCsoriginallyissuedin2002and2003

July17,2012toSeptember1,2012

Forrevalidatedand/orunexpiredTCCsoriginallyissuedin2004untilApril11,2012

July17,2012toOctober17,2012

RMCNo.40-2012prescribesaprescriptiveperiodforrulingsissuedpursuanttoSection40(C)(2)oftheTaxCode.

RMCNo.47-2012prescribestherulesanddeadlinesforthefilingofapplicationsforenrollmentintheVATTCCMonetizationProgram,pursuanttotheDOF,DBMandBIRJointCircularNo.2-2012datedMay31,2012.

Page 16: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

16 Tax Bulletin

►►►►• TheapplicationforenrollmentintheVATTCCMonetizationProgramforVATTCCsthatweresolelyissuedbytheBIRshallbefiledwiththeBIRVATTCC-issuingoffice,usingtheapplicationformforenrollmentwhichcanbedownloadedfromtheBIRwebsiteatwww.bir.gov.ph.

►►►►►• ForVATTCCsthatwerejointlyissuedbytheDOFOne-Stop-ShopInter-AgencyTaxCreditandDutyDrawbackCenterandtheBIR,theapplicationforenrollmentinsaidprogramcanbedownloadedfromtheDOFwebsiteathttp://taxcredit.dof.gov.ph.

►►►►• VATTCCholderswithpendingapplicationsforcashconversionofoutstandingVATTCCspursuanttoSection204(C)oftheTaxCodecanstillapplyforenrollmentintheMonetizationProgrambywithdrawingthepreviouslyfiledapplicationforcashconversionandfilinganewapplicationforenrollmentwithsaidprogramwiththeVATTCC-issuingofficesdesignatedastheReceivingOfficesfortheProgram’sApplicationforEnrollment.

[Editor’s Note: RMO 47-2012 was amended by RMO 51-2012 dated August 31, 2012 to extend the deadline for filing applications for monetization for revalidated and unexpired TCCs originally issued in 2002 and 2003, from September 1, 2012 to “September 15, 2012 or the expiration of the TCC, whichever comes first.”]

BOC Issuances

Customs Administrative Order No. 1-2012 dated June 26, 2012

►►►►►• CAONo.1-2012shallinitiallyapplytoexportersinsidetheClarkFreeportZonewithinthejurisdictionofthePortofClark.UponthedirectiveoftheBOCCommissioner,itshallcoverexportersinotherselectedairorseaports.

►►►►►• TheCommissionerofCustomsshallconstituteacommitteeheadedbyaDeputyCommissionerinchargeofaccreditationofAEOs.ThecommitteeshallperformotherfunctionsasmaybedeterminedbytheCommissioner.

►►►►►• RequirementsundertheAEOProgram:

1. Dulyfilled-upApplicationForm

2. Disclosureofthefollowinginformation:

a. Organizationalcharacteristics;b. Compliancerecord;c. Volumeofbusiness;d. Goods;e. Internalproceduresrelatedtodeclaration.

3. Companysecurityprofileincluding:

a. Asummaryofthecompany’ssecuritymanagementsystem;b. Asummaryofthecompany’sriskassessmentprocess;c. Measurestoenhancethesecurityofthecompany’ssupplychain.

4. Supportingdocumentsincluding:

a. Processmapthatillustratestheflowofgoodsandinformationthroughthecompany’ssupplychain;

b. Siteplanthatshowsthelayoutofthecompany’spremisesandclearlyidentifiesallperimeters,accessareas,buildings,structures,securityandaccesscontrols.

CAONo.1-2012establishestheAuthorizedEconomicOperator(AEO)Programforexporters.

Page 17: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

17

5. Copyofthecompany’srelevantsecurityaccreditations.

6. Otherrelevantsupportingdocuments.

►►►►►• Thesummaryofthesecuritymanagementsystemshallcontainthefollowing:

1. Company’ssecuritypolicy,securityobjectivesandcommitmenttosecurity;2. Proceduresforensuringthatpertinentsecuritymanagementinformationis

communicatedtoandfromrelevantemployeesandotherstakeholders;3. Proceduresforthereviewofthecompany’ssecurityprofileatplanned

intervals,toensureitscontinuingsustainability,adequacyandeffectiveness;4. Otherrelevantinformation.

►►►►►• Thesummaryofriskassessmentshallcontainthefollowing:

1. Flowcharttoillustratethecompany’sriskassessmentprocess;2. Risksandvulnerabilitiesidentified;3. Countermeasuresputinplacetoreducetheidentifiedrisksand

vulnerabilities;4. Whentheriskassessmentwasconducted;5. Whoconductedtheriskassessment;6. Otherrelevantinformation.

►►►►►• Elementsofthesecuritymeasuresthatneedtobeaddressed:

1. Premisessecurityandaccesscontrols;2. Personnelsecurity;3. Businesspartnersecurity;4. Cargosecurity;5. Conveyancesecurity;6. InformationandInformationTechnology(IT)security;7. Incidentmanagementandinvestigations;8. Crisismanagementandincidentrecovery.

►►►►►• Asidefromincreasedvisibilityofgoodsinthesupplychain,reductioninpilferages,andgreaterefficiencyinsupplychainmanagement,accreditedcompaniesshallbeentitledtothefollowingbenefits:

1. Dedicatedprocessinglanesresultinginreducedprocessingperiod;2. Renewalofexporteraccreditationonalongtermbasis;3. Lastpriorityinpost-entryaudit;4. Recognitionasalowriskcompany;5. ReducedinspectionorexpeditedclearancebyotherCustomsauthorities

shouldcertifiedstatusbealsorecognizedbyothercountriesunderamutualrecognitionprogramestablishedunderabilateralormultilateralarrangement;

6. OthertradefacilitationbenefitsthatmaybeaffordedbytheBOCunderexistinglawsandregulations.

►►►►►• AtrustedpartnerundertheAEOProgramshallhavethefollowingresponsibilities:

1. UpdatetheBOCasandwhentherearesignificantchangestothecompany’ssecurityprofileandotherinformationrequiredtobedisclosed;

2. Submitanannualstatementofcommitment;3. InformtheBOCofanynon-conformitiesbythecompanywithAEO-

PhilippinesGuidelines;4. Renewitsaccreditationasatrustedpartnereverytwo(2)years.

Page 18: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

18 Tax Bulletin

►►►►►• TheaccreditationundertheAEOProgrammayberevokedforthefollowinggrounds:

1. ViolationofthetermsandconditionsoftheAEOcertification;2. Non-compliancebythecompanywithPhilippinecustomslawsand

regulationsorotherlawsandregulations;3. Supplychainsecurityweaknessesornon-conformitywithCAONo.

1-2012anditsimplementingrulesandregulations;4. CompanyoptstowithdrawfromtheProgram.

►►►►• AcompanymayappealtheBOCdecisiondenyingitsapplicationundertheAEOProgramwiththeCommissionerofCustomswithin15calendardaysfromreceiptofthedecision.

►►►►►• Alldocumentsorinformationprovidedbycompaniesshallremainconfidential,andshallnotbedisclosedtoathirdpartywithoutthecompanies’priorwrittenconsent.

►►►►►• TheCommissionerofCustoms,uponconsultationwithstakeholders,shallissuetherulesandregulationsfortheeffectiveimplementationofCAONo.1-2012.

►►►►►• Allorders,memoranda,circularsorpartsthereofwhichareinconsistentwithCAONo.1-2012aredeemedrevoked,amended,ormodifiedaccordingly.

►►►►►• CAONo.1-2012shalltakeeffectfifteen(15)daysafterpublicationinanewspaperofgeneralcirculation.

[Editor’s Note: CAO No. 1-2012 was published in the ManilaBulletin and the PhilippineStar on August 15, 2012.]

Customs Memorandum Order No. 9-2012 dated July 26, 2012

►►►►►• ExistingBOCrulesandregulationsallowforthemanualprocessingofimportentriesinthefollowingcases:

1. Computersystemsbreakdown;2. Powerfailurewhichrendersthecomputersystemnon-operational;3. Theauthorizedagentbankisoffline;4. UponauthorizationbytheBOCDeputyCommissionerforMISTG.

►►►►►►• Formanualprocessingofimportentries,priorauthorizationfromtheCommissionerofCustomsorinhisabsence,theDeputyCommissionerforMISTG,shallbeobtained.

►►►►►►• TheDistrictorPortCollectorshallbeheldaccountableforimportentriesprocessedmanuallywithoutpriorapprovaloftheCommissionerofCustomsortheDeputyCommissionerforMISTG.ErringBOCofficialsandemployeesshallbeimposedappropriateadministrative,civil,and/orcriminalsanctions,subjecttoexistinglawsandCivilServicerulesandregulations.

CMONo.9-2012requirespriorapprovalfromtheCommissionerofCustomsortheDeputyCommissionerfortheMISTGforthemanualprocessingofimportentriesinordertoeffecttheclearanceandreleaseofimportedgoods.

Page 19: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

19

PSE Issuance

PSE Memorandum CN No. 2012-0046 dated August 22, 2012

►• UndertheAmendedRuleonminimumpublicownership(MPO),listedcompaniesthatarenotcompliantwiththeMPOrequirementaregivenagraceperiodofuptoDecember31,2012withinwhichtocomplywiththeMPO.

• Immediatelyafterthegraceperiod,thePSEwillimposeatradingsuspensiononsaidsharesforaperiodofnotmorethan6months.

►• Consequently,thesaleofsaidsharesduringthesuspensionperiodmayonlybeeffectedoutsidethePSE’stradingsystem,andshallbesubjecttothefollowingtaxes:

Applicable Tax Tax Rate and Base

CapitalGainsTax OnnetcapitalgainsamountingtonotoverP100,000.00–5%

OnanyamountinexcessofP100,000.00–10%

DocumentaryStampTax P0.75oneachP200.00oftheparvalueofthestock

►• Furthermore,ifthefairmarketvalue(FMV)ofthesharesofstocksoldisgreaterthantheconsiderationorthesellingprice,theamountbywhichtheFMVofthesharesexceedsthesellingpriceshallbedeemedagiftsubjecttodonor’staxunderSection100oftheTaxCode.IntheabsenceofanyissuancebytheBIRtothecontrary,therulesprescribedinRRNo.06-08fordeterminingthevalueoflistedsharesofstockwhichweresold,transferredorexchangedoutsideofthetradingsystemand/orfacilitiesofthePSEshallapply.

►• TheforegoingarebasedonthePSE’sunderstandingoftheexistingprovisionsoftheTaxCodeandrelevantBIRissuances.Incaseofconflictorambiguity,theBIR’sinterpretationshallprevail.

SEC Issuances

SEC Memorandum Circular No. 6 dated August 15, 2012

►►• ConsistentwiththeobjectivesoftheAntiRedTapeActof2007(RANo.9485),theSECresolvedtodispensewiththefollowingrequirementsintheregistrationactivitiesbelow:

1. BankCertificateofDeposit–fortheregistrationoftheArticlesofIncorporationofnewcorporationswherethesubscriptiontotheauthorizedcapitalstockispaidincash;ifaportionofthesubscriptionisotherthancash,thenon-cashsubscriptionshallbeprovenbytheappropriatesupportingdocuments;

PSEMemorandumCNNo.2012-0046remindstheinvestingpublicoftheeffectsofthefailureoflistedcompaniestocomplywiththeMPOrequirementbyDecember31,2012.

SECMCNo.6dispenseswithsomerequirementsinsomeregistrationactivities.

Page 20: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

20 Tax Bulletin

2. SpecialAuditReport–forapplicationsforincreaseintheauthorizedcapitalstockofcorporationswherethesubscriptiontotheincreaseispaidincashexcept(a)listedcompanies,(b)publiccompaniesasdefinedintheSecuritiesRegulationCode,(c)companiesthatofferorsellsecuritiestothepublic,and(d)wherethepaymentforthesubscriptiontotheincreaseismorethanP10million;

Inlieuofsuchreport,anotarizedSubscriptionContractbetweenthestockholder/sandtreasurerstatingthenumberofadditionalsharessubscribedtoandpaidforshallbesubmittedbythecorporation.

3. PrimaryEntry–forDeedofAssignmentintheregistrationofnewcorporationsorincreaseintheauthorizedcapitalstockwherelandorrealestatepropertyisofferedasconsiderationforsubscriptiontosharesofstock.

►►• SECMCNo.6shalltakeeffectimmediately.

(Editor’s Note: SEC MC No. 6 was published in the ManilaTimes on August 23, 2012.)

SEC-OGC Opinion No. 12-11 dated August 8, 2012

Facts:ACo.isprivatecorporationwhichis99.995%ownedbyforeignindividuals.Issue:

CanACo.acquirerealpropertyinthePhilippines?

Ruling:

No.ACo.cannotownlandinthePhilippines.Foracorporationtopurchase,acquireorownlandinthePhilippines,atleast60%ofthetotalcapitalstockofthecorporationmustbewholly-ownedbyFilipinocitizens.

Astoownershipofrealpropertyotherthanland,foreignerscangenerallypurchasehousesorbuildingsunlessspecificallyprohibitedbylaw.Oneexampleofaprohibitiononownershipofinterestinabuildingisinthecaseofacondominiumproject.Interestinacondominiummaybeintheformofownership,leaseoranyrealrights.Ifthecondominiumprojectissetuponleasedland,thecorrespondingcondominiumcorporationmaybeestablishedbyacorporation100%foreign-owned.Ifthecondominiumprojectissituatedonalandownedbythecondominiumcorporation,whichisaFilipinocorporation,anyinterestinthecondominiumcannotbetransferredtoaliensorforeigncorporationswhosecapitalstockismorethan40%ownedbyaliens.Ifthecommonareasareheldbyacondominiumcorporation,thetransfertoaliensofunitsinaprojectmaybemadeonlyuptothepointwheretheconcomitanttransferofstockholdingsinthecondominiumcorporationwouldnotcausethealieninterestinsuchcorporationtoexceed40%ofitsentirestock.

Foracorporationtopurchase,acquireorownlandinthePhilippines,atleast60%ofthetotalcapitalstockofthecorporationmustbewholly-ownedbyFilipinocitizens.

Page 21: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

21

SEC-OGC Opinion No. 12-12 dated August 9, 2012

Facts:CCo.isaholdingcompany.Ittransferreditsprincipalofficetoanewaddresssituatedinthesamecitywhereitspreviousofficewaslocated.IthasapendingapplicationforanamendmentofitsArticlesofIncorporation(AOI).Issue:

DoesCCo.needtoamenditsAOItoreflectthechangeinitsofficeaddress?

Ruling:

Yes.CCo.needstoamenditsAOItoreflectthechangeofaddressfromonebuildingtoanotherevenifthesecondbuildingiswithinthesamecityormunicipality.ItisnotenoughtoreflectthechangeintheGeneralInformationSheet(GIS).However,ifthetransferismerelytoanotherfloorofthesamebuilding,thereisnoneedtoamendtheAOI.

Asforanypenaltytobeimposed,sincethereisapendingapplicationforamendmentofAOI,nopenaltywillbeimposediftheboardresolutioneffectingthechangeinaddresshasthesameorearlierdatethantheGIS.However,iftheGISisdatedearlierthantheboardresolution,afineofP5,000.00willbeimposedonastockcorporation.

SEC-OGC Opinion No. 12-13 dated August 9, 2012

Facts:XCo.isaholdingcompanythatowns11%shareholdingsinYCo.,anairlinecompanywhichis40%foreign-owned.

Atpresent,XCo.is100%Filipino-owned.However,itwishestorestructureitsshareholdingsbyallowing51%ofitssharestobesubscribedbyAtty.Z,aFilipinocitizen.Atty.ZholdsthesharesintrustforMs.A,a14-year-oldbeneficiarywhowasbornoutoflawfulwedlockbetweenMr.G,aGermannational,andhisFilipinawife;hence,Ms.AislikewiseaFilipinocitizen.

Mr.Gholds30%outofthe40%foreignownershipinYCo.Mr.G,Ms.A’sfatherandlegalguardian,executedadeedoftrustinfavorofAtty.ZtoconcludetheshareholdingsofMs.AinXCo.Issues:

1. IsthetrustagreementbetweenMr.GandAtty.Zvalid?2. IftheproposedrestructuringisadoptedbyXCo.,isXCo.stillconsidered

100%Filipino-owned?3. IftheproposedrestructuringisadoptedbyXCo.,willYCo.beinexcessof

the40%foreignownershiplimitation?

AcorporationneedstoamenditsAOItoreflectthechangeofaddressfromonebuildingtoanother,evenifthesecondbuildingiswithinthesamecityormunicipality.

Indeterminingthecitizenshipofsharesbeingheldintrust,thenationalityofboththetrusteeandthebeneficiaryshouldbeconsidered.

Page 22: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

22 Tax Bulletin

Ruling:

1. TheSECcannotrenderanopiniononthevalidityofcontracts,suchasatrustagreement.

2. Yes.XCo.willstillbeconsidered100%Filipino-ownediftheproposedstructuringisadopted.Forpublicutilitycompaniessuchasanairlinecompany,atleast60%ofitscapitalmustbeownedbyFilipinocitizens.Indeterminingthecitizenshipofsharesbeingheldintrust,thenationalityofboththetrusteeandthebeneficiaryshouldbeconsidered.

Intheproposedrestructure,51%ofthesharesinXCo.willbesubscribedbyAtty.Z,whoisaFilipinotrustee,intrustforMs.A,whoisaFilipinobeneficiary.Thus,XCo.willstillbe100%Filipino-owned.

3. No.YCo.willnotbeinexcessofthe40%foreignownershiplimitationiftheproposedstructuringisadopted.

Atpresent,40%ofYCo.isforeign-owned.Iftherestructuringisadopted,11%,whichisownedbyXCo.willstillbeconsideredFilipino-owned.Astotheremaining49%,weassumethatthisisownedbyFilipinos.Thus,YCo.satisfiesthe60%Filipinoownershiprequirement.

BSP Issuance

BSP Circular No. 762 dated July 25, 2012

►►►• SectionX128/4137QandrelatedsubsectionsoftheManualofRegulationsforBanks(MORB)/ManualofRegulationsforNon-BankFinancialInstitutions(MORNBFI)shallbeaddedtoread,asfollows:

“SectionX128/4137Q–Deposits for stock subscription.Depositsforstocksubscriptionrefertopaymentsmadebyexistingstockholdersornewsubscribersofthebank/quasi-bank(QB)onsubscriptiontotheincreaseintheauthorizedcapital,whichmayberecognizedeitherasaliabilityorequity.

Depositsforstocksubscriptionshallberecognizedaspartoftheequityforprudentialreportingpurposeswhenallofthefollowingconditionsaremet:

1. ThedepositforstocksubscriptionmeetsthedefinitionofanequityinstrumentunderPhilippineAccountingStandards(PAS)32Financial Instruments: Presentationsuchthatthedepositforstocksubscriptionshallnotbeinterest-bearingnorwithdrawablebythesubscriber.

2. Thebank/QB’sexistingauthorizedcapitalisalreadyfullysubscribed;

3. Thebank/QB’sstockholdersandboardofdirectorshaveapprovedtheproposedincreaseinauthorizedcapital;

CircularNo.762amendstheregulationsonDepositsforStockSubscriptionsofbanks/quasi-banks.

Page 23: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

23

4. Thebank/QBhasfiledanapplicationfortheamendmentofitsArticlesofIncorporationfortheincreaseinauthorizedcapitalwiththeappropriatedepartmentoftheSES,BSP,dulysupportedbycompletedocumentsaslistedinCircularLetterNo.2009-042datedMay14,2009;

ApplicationsfortheamendmentofArticlesofIncorporationfortheincreaseinauthorizedcapital,whichhavebeenreturnedduetoinsufficiencyofsupportingdocuments,shallnotqualifyforrecognitionasanequityinstrument;and

5. ThebankmusthaveobtainedapprovaloftheMonetaryBoardontransactionsinvolvingsignificantownershipofvotingsharesofstockbyanyperson,naturalorjuridical,orbyonegroupofpersons,asprovidedinSubsec.X126.2.b,ifapplicable.

Depositsforstocksubscription,whichdonotmeettheabovementionedconditionsshallbeclassifiedasaliability.

Depositsforstocksubscription,whichmeettheconditionstoberecognizedasequity,shallformpartofabank’squalifyingcapitalforpurposesofcomputingtherisk-basedcapitaladequacyratiounderSectionsX115foruniversalandcommercialbanks,aswellastheirsubsidiarybanksandQBs,andX118forstand-alonethriftbanks,ruralbanksandcooperativebanks.”

• PartIIofAppendix63b/AppendixQ-46oftheMORB/MORNBFIonthequalifyingcapitalundertherisk-basedcapitaladequacyframeworkforthePhilippinebankingsystemwereamended,asfollows:

1. “Depositforcommonstocksubscription”and“Depositforperpetualandnon-cumulativepreferredstocksubscription”wereaddedascomponentsofCoreTier1capitalandremovedfromUpperTier2capital;

2. “Depositforperpetualandcumulativepreferredstocksubscription”and“Depositforlimitedliferedeemablepreferredstocksubscriptionwiththereplacementrequirementuponredemption”wereaddedascomponentsofUpperTier2capitalandremovedfromLowerTier2capital;

3. “Depositforlimitedliferedeemablepreferredstocksubscriptionwithoutthereplacementrequirementuponredemption”wasaddedasacomponentofLowerTier2capital;

►• PartIIofAppendix63coftheMORBonqualifyingcapitalundertherisk-basedcapitaladequacyframeworkforstand-alonethriftbanks,ruralbanksandcooperativebankswasamended,asfollows:

1. “Depositforcommonstocksubscription”and“Depositforperpetualandnon-cumulativepreferredstocksubscription”wereaddedascomponentsofCoreTier1capitalandremovedfromUpperTier2capital;

2. “Depositforperpetualandcumulativepreferredstocksubscription”and“Depositforlimitedliferedeemablepreferredstocksubscriptionwiththereplacementrequirementuponredemption”wereaddedascomponentsofUpperTier2capitalandremovedfromLowerTier2capital;

Page 24: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

24 Tax Bulletin

3. “Depositforlimitedliferedeemablepreferredstocksubscriptionwithoutthereplacementrequirementuponredemption”wasaddedasacomponentofLowerTier2capital;

►• PartVIofAppendix63coftheMORBondefinitionsundertherisk-basedcapitaladequacyframeworkforstand-alonethriftbanks,ruralbanksandcooperativebankswasamended,asfollows:

“PartVI.Definitions

xxx

8. Depositforstocksubscription–ThisreferstothefundsreceivedasdepositsforstocksubscriptionthatmeettheconditionsforrecognitionasequityprovidedinSec.X128.

xxx”

►• Subsection4116Q.2oftheMORNBFIonqualifyingcapitalwasamendedasfollows:

1. “Depositforcommonstocksubscription”and“Depositforperpetualandnon-cumulativepreferredstocksubscription”wereaddedascomponentsofTier1(core)capitalandremovedfromUpperTier2capital;

2. “Depositforperpetualandcumulativepreferredstocksubscription”wasaddedasacomponentofUpperTier2capitalandremovedfromLowerTier2capital;

3. “Depositforlimitedliferedeemablepreferredstocksubscription”wasaddedasacomponentofLowerTier2capital;

►• TheFinancialReportingPackage(FRP),issuedunderCircularNo.512datedFebruary3,2006,asamended,wasfurtheramendedasfollows:

1. Revisionofthedefinitionof“Depositforstocksubscription”accountunder“OtherLiabilities”oftheManualofAccounts;

2. Creationof“Depositforstocksubscription”accountunder“EquityAccounts”oftheManualofAccounts;and

3. RevisionofthereportingtemplatesoftheBalanceSheetoftheFRP/SimplifiedFRP.

►• TheguidelinegoverningthemodeandsubmissionofthereportorialtemplatesofFRP,SimplifiedFRPandRisk-BasedCapitalAdequacyFrameworksshallbecoveredbyaseparateissuance.

►• ThisCircularshalltakeeffect15daysfollowingitspublicationeitherintheOfficialGazetteorinanewspaperofgeneralcirculation.

[Editor’s Note: Circular No. 762 was published in the MalayaBusinessInsight on July 30, 2012.]

Page 25: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

25

BSP Circular No. 763 dated August 3, 2012

►• SubsectionX302.3isaddedtotheMORB,toreadasfollows:

“SubsectionX302.3.RegulatoryReliefforBanksunderRehabilitationProgramApprovedbytheBSP-

Banksmaybeallowedtochargetheiroutstandingunbookedallowanceforprobablelossesdirectlytoretainedearnings,onaone-timebasis,subjecttothefollowingconditions:

a. ThatthisisinconnectionwithacomprehensiverehabilitationprogramapprovedbytheBSP;and

b. Theeffectthereof,ifthesehadbeenchargedtoprofitandloss,shallbefullydisclosedintheauditedfinancialstatements,annualreportsandpublishedstatementofcondition.”

►• ThisCircularshalltakeeffect15calendardaysfollowingitspublicationeitherintheOfficialGazetteorinanewspaperofgeneralcirculation.

[Editor’s Note: Circular No. 763 was published in the ManilaStandardToday on August 11, 2012.]

BSP Circular No. 764 dated August 3, 2012

►• ThefollowingsectionsoftheMORNBFIareamendedtoprovidethattherulesonoutsourcingofbankingfunctionsasshowninAppendixQ-37shallbeadopted:

1. Section4162Q(2008–4190Q),insofarastheyareapplicabletoquasi-banks(QB);

2. Subsection4406Q.9,insofarastheyareapplicabletotrustdepartmentsofQBsperformingtrustandotherfiduciarybusinessandinvestmentmanagementactivities;

3. Subsection4701Q.13,insofarastheyareapplicabletoQBs’outsourcingofinternetandmobileelectronicservices;

4. Section4190S,insofarastheyareapplicabletonon-stocksavingsandloanassociations;

5. Section4190P,insofarastheyareapplicabletopawnshops;and

6. Section4190N,insofarastheyareapplicabletofinancialinstitutions.

►• Appendix37oftheMORNBFIisamendedandre-titledasRevisedOutsourcingFrameworkforBanks.

CircularNo.763providesforregulatoryrelieftobanksunderrehabilitationprogram.

CircularNo.764prescribestheRevisedOutsourcingFrameworkforNBFIs.

Page 26: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

26 Tax Bulletin

►• ThisCircularshalltakeeffect15calendardaysfollowingitspublicationeitherintheOfficialGazetteorinanewspaperofgeneralcirculation.

[Editor’s Note: Circular No. 764 was published in the BusinessMirror on August 13, 2012.]

BSP Circular No. 765 dated August 3, 2012

►►• SectionX162oftheMORBisre-titledandamendedtoreflectastatementofprinciplewhichshallreadasfollows:

“Section162Statement of Principle on Outsourcing.Aninstitutionmayoutsourcebankingsupportandmarketingactivitiessubjecttotheprovisionssetforthbelow.Accordingly,aninstitutionisexposedtooperationalrisksasaresultofoutsourcing.Assuch,aninstitutionthatavailsofoutsourcingshouldhaveinplaceappropriatemechanismstoensureeffectivemanagementofattendantrisks.”

►• ThepreviousSectionX162oftheMORBshallberenumberedasSubsectionX162.1,Governance in All Cases of Outsourcing of Banking Functions,andamendedtoprovidetheresponsibilitiesofabankwhenoutsourcingisallowedbylaw.

►►• ThepreviousSubsectionX162.1oftheMORB(2008–X169.1),Prohibition against outsourcing certain banking functions,isrenumberedasSubsectionX162.2andamendedtoprovideinherentbankfunctionsthatnobankshalloutsource.ThepreviousSubsectionX162.2(2008–X169.2)onOutsourcing of Information Technology Systems/ProcessesisamendedandtransferredtotheAppendixofSectionX162oftheMORBinrelevantdocumentations.

►• ThepreviousSubsectionX162.3(2008–X169.3),Outsourcing of Other Banking Functions,isdeleted.ThenewSubsectionX162.3oftheMORBreadsasfollows:

“SubsectionX162.3Definition.Outsourcingshallrefertoanycontractualagreementbetweenabankandaqualifiedserviceproviderforthelattertoperformdesignatedactivitiesonacontinuingbasisonbehalfofthebank.”

►• ThenewSubsectionX162.4,Managing Outsourcing-Related Risks,oftheMORBfocusesontheresponsibilityofthebanktomanagetheoperationalrisksthatarisefromoutsourcing.

►• ThenewSubsectionX162.5readsasfollows:

“SubsectionX162.5Authority to Outsource.OnlythosebankswithaCAMELScompositeratingofatleast“3”andaManagementRatingofnotlowerthan“3”shallbeallowedtooutsourcedesignatedactivitieswithoutpriorBSPapproval.Otherwise,thebankmustsecurepriorapprovalfromtheappropriatesupervisingdepartmentoftheBSPwhoseevaluationwillbebasedonthebank’sabilitytomanagerisksattendanttooutsourcing.”

►• ThenewSubsectionX162.6,Documentation,requiresbankstokeepthenecessarydocumentationtoshowthatoutsourcingarrangementsareproperlyreviewedandtheappropriateduediligencehasbeenundertakenpriortoimplementation.

CircularNo.765prescribestheRevisedOutsourcingFrameworkforBanks.

Page 27: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

27

►►• SubsectionsX162.11(2008–X169.11)andX162.12(2008–169.12)oftheMORBareconsolidated,re-titledandrenumberedasSubsectionX162.7,Intra-group Outsourcing,andamendedtoprovidetheconditionsincaseabankisactingasaserviceproviderwithinitsbusinessgroup.

►• ThenewSubsectionX162.8,Offshore Outsourcing,providesfortheconditionsincasesofoutsourcingwheretheserviceproviderislocatedoutsidethecountry.

►►• ThepreviousSubsectionX162.4(2008–X169.4)isrenumberedasthenewSubsectionX162.9andamendedtoreadasfollows:

“SubsectionX162.9Service Providers.Thebankshallcarryoutduediligenceinselectingserviceproviders.Itmustensuretheintegrity,technicalexpertise,operationalcapability,financialcapacityandsuitabilityoftheserviceprovidertoperformtheoutsourcedactivity.Incaseswheretheclientsareprejudicedduetoerrors,omissionsandfraudsbytheserviceprovider,thebankshallbeliableinprovidingtheappropriateremediesasmaybeallowedbylawsorregulations,withoutprejudicetorecoursebythebanktotheserviceprovider.”

►• ThepreviousSubsectionX162.5isrenumberedasSubsectionX162.10,re-titledandamendedtoreadasfollows:

“SubsectionX162.10Transitory Provision.AlloutsourcingagreementsmustbealignedwiththeprovisionsofSectionX162oftheMORB.Existingoutsourcingagreementswhicharenotinaccordancewiththiscircularwillnotbeunwound.However,itmustcomplywiththerequirementsprovidedhereinuponrenewaloftheagreements.”

►►• ThepreviousSubsectionX162.19,Penalties,isre-numberedasSubsectionX162.11.

►►• SubsectionsX406.9,Outsourcing Services in Trust Departments,andX701.13(2008–X621.13),Outsourcing of interment and Mobile Banking Services,oftheMORBaredeleted.

►►• ThisCircularshalltakeeffect15calendardaysfollowingitspublicationeitherintheOfficialGazetteorinanewspaperofgeneralcirculation.

[Editor’s Note: Circular No. 765 was published in TheManilaTimes on August 13, 2012.]

BSP Circular No. 766 dated August 17, 2012

►►• SectionX401/4401Q,Statement of Principles,oftheMORB/MORNBFIareamendedtoprovidethatpoliciespredicateduponthecardinalprincipleoffidelityshallbedirectedtowardstheobservanceofprudentadministration,undividedloyaltyandutmostcare,non-delegationofresponsibilities,preservingandprotectingproperty,andkeepingandrenderingaccounts.

►►• SectionsX403/4403Q,Definitions,oftheMORB/MORNBFIareamendedbyre-assigningitems“a”to“u”as“b”to“v”andaddinganewitem“a”asfollows:

CircularNo.766prescribestheGuidelinesinStrengtheningCorporateGovernanceandRiskManagementPracticesonTrust,OtherFiduciaryBusiness,andInvestmentManagementActivities.

Page 28: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

28 Tax Bulletin

“A.TrustEntityshallrefertoa(a)bankornon-bankfinancialinstitution,throughitsspecificallydesignatedbusinessunittoperformtrustfunctions,or(b)trustcorporation,authorizedbytheBangkoSentralngPilipinas(BSP)toengageintrustandotherfiduciarybusinessunderSection79ofR.A.No.8791(TheGeneralBankingLawof2000)ortoperforminvestmentmanagementservicesunderSection53ofR.A.No.8791.”

►►• SubsectionsX406.2/4406Q.2,Composition of trust committee,oftheMORB/MORNBFIareamendedtoprovidethattheTrustCommitteeshallhaveatleastfivemembersasfollows:

1. Thepresidentoranyseniorofficerofthebank/non-bankfinancialinstitution(NBFI);

2. Thetrustofficer;

3. Theremainingmembers,includingthechairperson,maybeanyofthefollowing:

i. Non-executivedirectorsorindependentdirectorswhoarebothnotpartoftheauditcommittee;or

ii. Thoseconsideredasqualified“IndependentProfessionals.”

Iftherearemorethan5members,amajorityshallbecomposedofqualifiednon-executivemembers.

►►• SubsectionX406.3/4406Q.3,Qualifications of committee members, officers and staff,oftheMORB/MORNBFIareamendedtoprovidethatdirectors,committeemembersandofficerschargedwiththeadministrationoftrustandotherfiduciaryactivitiesshallhavetheadditionalrequirementofrelevantexperienceinsuchbusiness.

Atrustofficer,inadditiontopossessingatleast3yearsofactualexperienceintrustoperationsoratleast5yearsofactualexperienceasanofficerofabank/NBFI,musthave:

1. Completedatleast90traininghoursintrust,otherfiduciarybusinessorinvestmentmanagementactivitiesacceptabletotheBSP;or

2. Completedarelevantglobalorlocalprofessionalcertificationprogram.

►►• ItemfofSections2404/3404oftheMORBontheauthoritytoengageinlimitedtrustbusinesstothriftbanksandruralbanks,respectively,shallberevisedtoprovidethatatrustofficer,inadditiontopossessingatleast1yearof

Page 29: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

29

actualexperienceintrustoperationsoratleast2yearsofactualexperienceasanofficerofabank/NBFI,musthave:

1. Completedatrainingprogramintrust,otherfiduciarybusinessorinvestmentmanagementactivitiesacceptabletotheBSP;or

2. Completedarelevantglobalorlocalprofessionalcertificationprogram.

►►• SubsectionsX406.a/4406Q.4,Responsibilities of Administration,oftheMORB/MORNBFIareamendedtoprovidethespecificresponsibilitiesofthefollowing:

1. TheBoardofDirectors(BOD)inrelationtotrustactivitiesofabank/NBFI;

2. TheTrustCommittee,whichisaspecialcommitteethatreportsdirectlytotheBODandisprimarilyresponsibleforoverseeingthefiduciaryactivitiesofthebank/NBFI;and

3. TheTrustOfficer,whoisvestedwiththemanagementoftheday-to-dayfiduciaryofficer.

►►• SubsectionsX406.10/4406Q.10,Confirmation of the appointment/ designation of trust officer and independent professional,oftheMORB/MORNBFIareamendedtoprovidethatanindependentprofessionalandtrustofficermustbefitandpropertodischargetheirrespectivefunctions.Theirappointment/designationshallbesubjecttoconfirmationbytheMonetaryBoardwhichshallinformtheconcernedbank/NBFIif,afterevaluation,itfindsgroundsforthedisqualificationoftheindependentprofessionalandtrustofficer.

• Trustentitiesofbanks/NFBIsthatdonotmeettherequirementsofthisCircularshallbegiventwelve(12)monthsfromthedateofeffectivitytocomply.

• Non-compliancewiththeprovisionsofthisCircularshallsubjectthebank/NBFIanditsBODtosanctionsprovidedunderSections36and37ofR.A.7653withoutprejudicetotheimpositionofothersanctionsastheMonetaryBoardmayconsiderwarrantedunderthecircumstancesthatmayincludebutnotlimitedtocurtailmentoffiduciaryactivities,and/orintroductionofnewbusiness,andsuchothersanctionsasmaybeprovidedbylaw.

• ThisCircularshalltakeeffect15calendardaysfollowingitspublicationeitherintheOfficialGazetteorinanewspaperofgeneralcirculation.

[Editor’s Note: Circular No. 766 was published in the ManilaBulletin on August 24, 2012.]

Page 30: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

30 Tax Bulletin

Court Decision

Team Pacific Corporation vs. Josephine Daza, in her capacity as Municipal Treasurer of TaguigSecondDivision,G.R.No.167732,promulgatedJuly11,2012

Facts:

PetitionerTeamPacificCorporation(TPC),adomesticcorporationengagedinthebusinessofassemblingandexportingsemiconductordevices,conductsitsbusinessattheFTIComplexinTaguig.Sincethestartofitsoperations,TPChadbeenpayinglocalbusinesstaxes(LBT)at1/2oftheratesimposedon“exportersandonmanufacturers,millers,producers,wholesalers,distributors,dealersorretailersofessentialcommodities”pursuanttotheTaguigRevenueCode.

WhenTPCreneweditsbusinesslicensein2004,however,RespondentJosephineDaza,thenMunicipalTreasurerofTaguig,assessedLBTatthefullrateonthegroundthatTPCisnotanexporterofessentialcommodities.

TPCpaidtheassessedLBTandfiledawrittenprotestonJanuary19,2004.OnApril15,2004,TPCfiledapetitionforcertiorariunderRule65ofthe1997RulesofCivilProcedurebeforetheRegionalTrialCourt(RTC).TPCallegedthatDazadidnotactonitsprotestwithin60days,asprescribedunderArticle195oftheLocalGovernmentCode(LGC),andthatDazaactedwithgraveabuseofdiscretioninnotapplyingthe1/2rateprovidedundertheTaguigRevenueCode.

DazaarguedthatTPCerredinfilingapetitionforcertiorariandthatTPCshouldhave,instead,filedanappealincourtwithin30daysfromreceiptofthedenial.

TheRTCdismissedthepetition.ItfoundthattherewasnoproofofdenialofTPC’sprotest.Hence,TPChad30daysfromthelapseofthe60daysallowedforthetreasurertomakeitsdecision,withinwhichtoperfectanordinaryappeal.TheRTCruledthatthespecialcivilactionofcertiorariisnottheproperremedyofTPC.

TPCappealedtotheSupremeCourtandarguedthattheremedyofappealisnotspecifiedunderArticle195oftheLGC,andtherefore,aRule65petitionforcertiorariistheproperandlogicalremedy,giventhatDazaactedwithgraveabuseofdiscretioninassessingitsLBTatthefullrate.

Afterreceivinganoticeofassessment,ataxpayermayfilewithin60daysawrittenprotestwiththelocaltreasurer,whichshalldecideonitwithin60days.ThetaxpayercanmakeanappealtotheRegionalTimeCourt(RTC)within30daysfromreceivingthedenialoftheprotest,orfromthelapseofthe60-dayperiodtodecideontheprotest.Thereafter,thetaxpayercanappealthedecisionoftheRTCtotheCourtofTaxAppeals(CTA)within30daysafterreceivingthedecision.

Page 31: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

31

Issue:

DidTPCavailofthecorrectremedyagainsttheassessmentwhenitfiledapetitionforcertioraribeforetheRTC?

Ruling:

No.TPCdidnotavailofthecorrectremedy.TPCshouldhavefiledanordinaryappealwiththeRTC.

Within60daysfromreceiptofanoticeofassessment,ataxpayermayfileawrittenprotestwiththelocaltreasurer,whichshalldecidethesamewithin60days.Thetaxpayershallhave30daysfromreceiptofthedenialoftheprotest,orfromthelapseofthe60-dayperiodgiventothelocaltreasurertodecidetheprotest,withinwhichtoappealtotheRTC.

Withoutanyformaldenialoftheprotest,TPC’sfilingofitspetitionbeforetheRTConApril19,2004wasdoneinatimelymanner.ReckonedfromthefilingoftheprotestonJanuary19,2004,Dazahad60daysoruntilMarch19,2004withinwhichtoresolvetheprotest.

Fromthelapseofthis60-dayperiod,TPChad30daysoruntilApril18,2004withinwhichtofileitsappealtotheRTC.SincethelatterdatefellonaSunday,theRTCcorrectlyruledthatTPC’sfilingofitspetitiononApril19,2004wasstillwithintheprescribedperiod.

However,aRule65petitionforcertiorariisnottheappropriateremedyfromDaza’sinactiononTPC’sprotest.Instead,TPCshouldhavefiledanordinaryappealwiththeRTC.Thereafter,anappealfromthejudgment,resolutionororderoftheRTCshallbemadewithin30daysafterreceiptofthedecision,byfilingapetitionforreviewwiththeCTA.

Theperfectionofanappealinthemannerandwithintheperiodfixedbylawisnotonlymandatorybutjurisdictional,andnon-compliancewiththeselegalrequirementsisfataltoaparty’scause.

Page 32: Ruling on Income Payment to NRFC for Services Outside Phils

32 Tax Bulletin

Wewelcomeyourcomments,ideasandquestions.PleasecontactMa.FidesA.Baliliviae-mailatMa.Fides.A.Balili@ph.ey.comorattelephonenumber894-8113andMarkAnthonyP.Tamayoviae-mailatMark.Anthony.P.Tamayo@ph.ey.comorattelephonenumber894-8391.

SyCip Gorres Velayo & Co.6760AyalaAvenue,MakatiCity,PhilippinesTelephone:(632)891-0307Fax:(632)819-0872

©2012SyCipGorresVelayo&Co.AllRightsReserved.FEAno.1000050

SGV&Co.maintainsofficesinMakati,Cebu,Davao,Bacolod,CagayandeOro,Baguio,GeneralSantosandCavite.

ForanelectroniccopyoftheTaxBulletinorforfurtherinformationaboutTaxServices,pleasevisitourwebsitewww.sgv.ph

Expirydate:noexpiry