Upload
colin-leonard
View
33
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
RTI and Behavior Process Improvement Group. Facilitators: Bill Trant, Susan Cole, & Leigh Gates. Agenda. Presentation of the Data Description of the Process What Works? Small Group Discussion & Whole Group Share What Needs to Work Better? Small Group Discussion & Whole Group Share - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
RTI and Behavior Process Improvement Group
Facilitators: Bill Trant, Susan Cole, & Leigh Gates
Agenda
– Presentation of the Data
– Description of the Process
– What Works?
• Small Group Discussion & Whole Group Share
– What Needs to Work Better?
• Small Group Discussion & Whole Group Share
– Wrap-up
THE STATE-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE
The Continuous Improvement Performance Plan•Indicator 4b•Indicators 9 and 10
Indicator 4b
Significant Discrepancy of > 10 Day Suspensions by Race/Ethnicity Due to 2009-2010 Data
– 1,073 total students suspended – 78 (7.3%) students with IEPs– More than 2 times discrepant in the number of
suspensions by race/ethnicity (African American)
Indicator 9 & 10
Disproportionate Representation by Race/Ethnicity in Disability Categories That is a Result of Inappropriate Identification 2001-2001 Data
– 2 categories: ID-MI (82/133) and SED (63/105). – ID-MI risk ratio: 6.2% NHCS > 5.36% State– SED risk ratio: 6% NHCS > 5% State – Disproportionate in the identification of African American
students in these two categories
THE DISTRICT-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE
RTI from a system perspective•A break down of data in terms of Behavior Intervention•A break down of Behavior Intervention in terms of Tiers
Entitlement Data
05-06 17
06-07 71
07-08 106
08-09 127
09-10 154
10-11 222
Entitlements by Behavior State Child Count (SED/Total)= 4%
05-06• 17• 0• At: 0• Ag: 0• 2 B: 0
06-07• 71• B:4(5.
63%)• At: 3• Ag: 1• 2 B: 0
07-08• 106• B:4(3.
77%)• At: 3• Ag: 1• 2 B: 0
08-09• 127• B:5(2.
36%)• At: 1• Ag: 3• 2 B: 1
09-10• 154• B:22(6
.49%)• At: 7• Ag: 9• 2 B: 6
09-10• 222• B:21(4
.05%)• At: 7• Ag: 8• 2 B: 6
KEY: B= Behavior; At= Entitled in Attention; Ag: Entitled in Aggression; 2 B= Entitled in 2 Behaviors
K-5 Students Provided Interventions in Tiers 2009-2010
• 3,501* (30% ADM) in RTI• 1,696 (48%) intervention info.• 639** (38%) cases = behavior• 539 * (84%) tier information
2010-2011
* Based on 25 schools**Based on 25 sch. w/3-4 w/<50% of data
89 (17%)
193 (36%)
237 (37%)
3 (1%)4
2
1
3
• 3,250* (29% ADM) in RTI• 1,261 (39%) intervention info.• 345** (27%) cases = behavior• 292 * (85%) tier information
* Based on 25 schools**Based on 20 sch. w/8-9 w/<50% of data
51 (17%)
122 (42%)
112 (38%)
7 (2%)4
2
1
3
6-8 Students Provided Interventions in Tiers
2009-2010
• 418* (8% ADM) in RTI• 197 (47%) intervention info.• 24** (12%) cases = behavior• 24* (100%) tier information
2010-2011
* Based on 7 schools**Based on 7 sch. w/2 w/<50% of data
0 (0%)
17 (71%)
6 (25%)
1 (4%)4
2
1
3
• 907* (17% ADM) in RTI• 401 (44%) intervention info.• 71** (18%) cases = behavior• 63* (89%) tier information
* Based on 7 schools**Based on 5 sch. w/3 w/<50% of data
12 (19%)
14 (22%)
36 (57%)
1 (2%)4
2
1
3