17
Republic of the Philippines Department of Education, Region VII, Central Visayas SCHOOLS DIVISION OF CEBU CITY RPMS – Individual Performance Commitment & Review Form Name of employee: MARJORIE C. MANLOSA Unit/Department/Section: BANILAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Position: TEACHER III Immediate Head/Supervisor: LILY ANN S. GO Rating Period: SY 2015 - 2016 Date of Review: OCTOBER 2015 TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) MOVs TARGET ACTUAL RESULT RATIN G SCORE Quality Access 25% 1.1. Learners’ Outcome (15%) Undertook activities to improve performance indicators 1.1.1 Increased in the following performance indicators by 2% over SY 2014-2015 a. NAT MPS in Science from ____ to _____ 1.1.2 Maintained SY 2015- 2016 SY 2015- NAT MPS in Science ( ) 5 – 130% or _____ & above 4 – 115% or _____ to 129% or _____ 3 – 100% or _____ to 114% or _____ 2 – 51% or _____ to 99% or _____ 1 – 50% or _____ & below NAT Result for SY 2014-2015 & 2015- 2016 NAT MPS in Science = _____ Failure 1

Rpms Output Inset

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

OUTPUT

Citation preview

Republic of the PhilippinesDepartment of Education, Region VII, Central VisayasSCHOOLS DIVISION OF CEBU CITY

RPMS Individual Performance Commitment & Review Form

Name of employee:MARJORIE C. MANLOSAUnit/Department/Section:BANILAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Position:TEACHER IIIImmediate Head/Supervisor:LILY ANN S. GO

Rating Period:SY 2015 - 2016Date of Review:OCTOBER 2015

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNINGTO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

Quality Access25%

1.1. Learners Outcome (15%)Undertook activities to improve performance indicators

1.1.1 Increased in the following performance indicators by 2% over SY 2014-2015

a. NAT MPS in Science from ____ to _____

1.1.2 Maintained in the following performance indicators over SY 2014-2015b. Failure Rate from 0 to 0

SY 2015-2016

SY 2015-2016

NAT MPS in Science ( )5 130% or _____ & above4 115% or _____ to 129% or _____3 100% or _____ to 114% or _____2 51% or _____ to 99% or _____1 50% or _____ & below

Failure Rate (0)5 04 13 22 31 4

NAT Result for SY 2014-2015 & 2015-2016

Form 4SY 2014-2015 & 2015-2016

NAT MPS in Science = _____

Failure Rate = 0

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

c. Drop-Out Rate from 0 to 0

SY 2015-2016Drop-Out Rate (0 )5 04 13 22 31 4

Form 4GESP/GSSP BoSY SY 2014-2015 & 2015-2016Drop-Out Rate = 0

d. Promotion RateSY 2015-2016Promotion rate (100)5 100%4 80%3 75%2 51%1 50%

Form 4GESP/GSSP BoSY SY 2014-2015 & 2015-2016Promotion Rate = 100%

1.2. Learning Environment (10%)Maintained Daily Routine (classroom cleanliness, classroom management, overall physical classroom atmosphere

1.2.1. Organized functional groups to monitor the following: a. classroom b. area of responsibility c. special area of responsibility

SY 2015-2016

Group Organized (1)5 3 or more functional groups4 2 functional groups3 1 functional group2 1 group1 did not fully organized 1 group

Assigned Area of Responsibility & its In-ChargeMonitoring checklist/AttendancePictorials of Improvement

1 functional group

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

1.2.2. Attained 6 points on 75% of the Evaluation Checklist

SY 2015-20166 Points Evaluation Rating (75%)5 130% & above the target or 381 points & above4 115% to 129% of the target or 337 to 380 points3 100% to 114% of the target or 293 to 336 points2 51% to 99% of the target or 149 to 292 points1 50% & below the target or 147 points & belowClassroom Evaluation Score Sheet100% to 114% of the target

1.2.3 Improved 5 of the following classroom facilities/physical environment:a. wall b. ceilingc. lightingd. classroom structuring/displaye. floorf. furnitureg. windowsh. blackboardi. doorsj. water facilityk. toiletl. cabinetsm. tablesn. chairso. multi-mediap. ventilationSY 2015-2016Improvement of classroom facilities/physical environment (5)5 7 or more facilities 4 6 facilities3 5 facilities2 3-4 facilities1 1 to 2 facilitiesPictorials (before & after improvement)

Improve ment of classroom facilities/physical environ ment= 5

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

Quality Teaching & Learning(50%)2.1. Teaching-Learning Development (35%)Taught 1 or more grade/year levels using appropriate innovative teaching strategies2.1.1 Taught the subjects/ sections handled with 75% appropriate innovative teaching strategies:

SY 2015-2016

With Innovative Teaching Strategies (No. of LP x No. of School Days x 0.75 5 130% or 213 & above4 115% or 189 to 129% or 212 3 100% or 164 to 114% or 1882 51% or 84 to 99% or 163 1 50% or 82 & below

Soft copy of PPTPictorialsActivity /Work SheetsLesson Plan

With Innovative Teaching Strategies = 75%

2.1.2 Distributed 5 books to 75% of the learnersSY 2015-2016Learners with 5 books each (26 to 27 pupils) 5 35 pupils and above 4 28 to 34 pupils 3 26 to 27 pupils 2 18 to 25 pupils1 17 pupils and belowMOASF 3Learners with 5 books each= 75% of the learners

Facilitated learning in the elementary/secondary schools through functional lesson plans, daily logs and innovative teaching strategies

2.1.3 Implemented 75% of the functional lesson plans/log plans with appropriate IMs

SY 2015-2016

Functional Lesson Plan Implementation with Instructional Materials (75%) 5 100%4 80%3 75%2 51%1 50%

Lesson Plan with Instructional Materials

Functional Lesson Plan = 75%

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

2.1.4 Made three (3) functional instructional materials with ten (10) times of utilization in a year

SY 2015-2016Functional IMs Made (3)5 5 or more IMs4 4 IMs3 3 IMs 2 2 IMs1 1 IM

Utilization of IMs (10)5 12 times & above4 11 times3 10 times2 9 times1 8 times & below

Pictures of IMs

Records of IMs utilization

Instructional Materials Made = 3

IMs utilization = 10

Monitored and evaluated pupils/students progress regularly2.1.5 Conducted 75% of the following examinations:a. Pre tests and Periodical Tests (8)b. Summative Tests (12)c. ORV in English (4)d. ORV in Filipino (4)e. Phil-IRI in English (2)f. Phil-IRI in Filipino (2)g. Math Drill (4)

SY 2015-2016

Written Examinations (27) 5 130% or 35 & above 4 115% or 31 to 129% or 34 3 100% or 27 to 114% or 30 2 51% or 15 to 99% or 26 1 50% or 14 & below

Practical Examination (3)5 5 Practical Exam4 4 Practical Exam3 3 Practical Exam2 2 Practical Exam 1 1 Practical Exam

Form XIV (Quizzes)Received Reports

PictorialsNarrative Report

Written Exam = 27

Practical Exams = 3

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

2.1.6 Awarded outstanding learners 3 times a year

SY 2015-2016

No. of Awarding Ceremony (3)5 5 Awarding4 4 Awarding3 3 Awarding2 2 Awarding1 - 1 AwardingDuplicate copy of certificate of recognitionPictorialsList of learners awarded

3 awarding

2.1.7 Implemented intervention plans based on Test Results of 1 subject taught per section/level

SY 2015-2016

Subject Area Intervention Plans Implemented (1)5 3 approved Intervention Plans implemented 4 2 approved Intervention Plans implemented3 1 approved Intervention Plan implemented2 1 approved intervention plan but not implemented1 unapproved intervention plan(Note: Average points of all Intervention Plans)

Intervention Result (75% Mastery Level)5 100% mastery level4 80% mastery level3 75% mastery level2 51% mastery level1 50% mastery level

Approved Intervention Plan

Item AnalysisForm XIVORV ResultPHIL-IRI ResultMath Drill Result

1 approved Intervention Plan implemented

Intervention Result = 75%

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

Supervised curricular and co-curricular projects and activities

2.1.8. Updated academic and non-academic programs & projects portfolio with the conducted activities

SY 2015-2016

Portfolio Update (semi-annually)5 monthly4 quarterly3 semi-annually2 with complete portfolio at the end of the year1 with incomplete portfolio at the end of the year

Portfolio

Semi-annually Update

Monthly Club Activities (5) and Culminating Activity (1) Conducted5 7 MCA or more and 1 CA4 6 MCA and 1 CA3 5 MCA and 1 CA2 3 to 4 MCA and 1 CA1 1 to 2 MCA and 1 CA

Counseled and guided pupil/students

2.1.9 Conducted 50 counseling services in a year

SY 2015-2016

Counseling done (5)5 49 counseling services & above4 44 to 48 counseling services3 38 to 43 counseling services2 20 to 37 counseling services1= 19 counseling services & below

Anecdotal record

38 to 43 counseling services

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

2.2 Personal Growth & professional development (15%)Conducted action plan/research.

2.2.1 Conducted 1 action research/plan with SWOT Analysis in a year.

SY 2015-2016

Action Plan/Research Conducted (1)5 1 with SDS approval4 1 with PSDS approval3 1 with SH approval2 1 without SH approval1 incomplete

SWOT AnalysisAction Research

1 AR with SH approval

2.2.3 Attended 5 seminars/trainings/LAC sessions/workshops in a year

SY 2015-2016

Seminars/trainings/workshops/LAC sessions attended (5)5 7 seminars & above4 6 seminars3 5 seminars2 4 seminars1 3 seminars & below

Certificate of participationTravel OrderNarrative ReportAttendanceSeminars /trainings/workshops/LAC session attended = 5

Quality & Good Governance (25%)

3.1. Community Linkages (15%)Supported activities of governmental and non-governmental organizations3.1.1. Conducted 3 Homeroom PTA Meetings/Teacher-Parent Conferences with 75% Participation

SY 2015-2016

Homeroom Meeting/TP Meetings (3)5 5 Meetings4 4 Meetings3 3 Meetings 2 2 Meetings1 1 Meetings

Attendance SheetMinutes of MeetingPictorials

HomeroomPTA Meetings/Teacher-Parent Conferences = 3

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

2.2.2. Earned 3 MA/Doctoral units in a year

SY 2015-2016

MA/Doctoral Units Earned 5 Doctoral Graduate/Dissertation4 MA Graduate/CAR3 24 and above MA units2 9 to 21 MA units1 - 0 to 6 MA units

(Note: 5 - Doctor of Education Graduate) Study load/Grade slipApproved Thesis/DissertationTOR

3 units earned

3.1.2. Participated in the following activities:NGO/LGU/PPP Initiateda. Parade/Alay Lakadb. Clean-Up Drivec. Tree Plantingd. BCPCe. Barangay Fiestaf. Others

School Initiated:a. Bridaga Eskwelab. Adopt-A-Schoolc. Fund Raisingd. Tree Planting/ Greeninge. Religious Activitiesf. Graduation/ Recognitiong. AIP /APP Makingh. Intramuralsi. OthersSY 2015-2016

NGO/LGU/PPP Initiated Activities (3)5 5 Activities & above4 4 Activities3 3 Activities 2 2 Activities 1 1 Activities

School Initiated Activities (5)5 7 Activities & above4 6 Activities3 5 Activities 2 3 to 4 Activities 1 1 to 2 Activities

Certificate of AppearancePictorials

Certificate of AppearancePictorials

NGO/LGU/PPP Initiated Activities = 3

School InitiatedActivities = 5

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

3.1.2.1 Pupils Participation in Fund Raising initiated by PTA:

Fund Raising Initiated by PTA (1)5 100% and above4 80% 3 75% 2 51% 1 50%

Liquidation Report signed by the BESTA TreasurerFund Raising = 3

Maintained harmonious relationship with fellow teachers and other school personnel as well as with parents and other stakeholders3.1.3 Resolved conflicts within school level.

SY 2015-2016

Conflicts Resolved (Sch. Level by Teacher)5 No Conflict4 Conflict resolved by the Teacher3 Conflict resolved by the School Grievance Committee 2 Conflict resolved by the District Grievance Committee 1 Conflict Resolved by the Division Grievance Committee

(Note: Average points of conflicts resolved)

Conflict Made (0)5 04 13 2 2 3 1 4 or more

Incident Report

Certification of No Conflict signed by SH

Conflict Resolve by the School Grievance Committee

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

3.2 Data Management (10%)Maintained updated pupils/students progress and school records regularly

3.2.1. Submitted the following accurate records on the deadline:a. SF 1b. SF 2c. SF 3 d. SF 5e. Form 137f. Form 138g. Form XIV with graph presentation & analysish. Test item analysis (Frequency of Error, Skills tested, Not Mastered/Least Mastered/Mastered Skills)i. List of 10 Least Mastered Skillsj. Class Record k. Grade Sheetl. DORP Form 1 m. DORP Form 2

SY 2015-2016

Date of submission 5 3 days earlier than the deadline4 1 day earlier than the deadline3 on time/deadline set2 1 day after the deadline1 3 days after the deadline

(Note: Average points of all submitted reports)

Accuracy5 100% or 13 accurate records4 80% or 11 to 12 accurate records3 75% or 10 accurate records 2 51% 6 to 9 accurate records1 50% or 5 & below

(Note: Average points of all submitted reports)

Received report on time/deadline set

75% or 10 accurate records

MFOsKRAsOBJECTIVESTIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)MOVsTARGETACTUAL RESULTRATINGSCORE

3.2.2. Distributed 75% of Form 138 on timeSY 2015-2016

Form 138 distribution (on time) 5= 100% distribution on set date or 35 pupils 4= 80% distribution on set date or 28 pupils 3= 75% distribution on set date or 26 to 27 pupils2= 51% distribution on set date or 18 to 25 pupils 1= 50% distribution on set date or 25 pupils and below

Attendance on Card IssuanceParents signature in Form 13875% distribution on set date

Does related work.

3.2.3 Compiled individual Teachers Professional Portfolio based on the following:a. pertinent recordsb. performance targetc. performance outputd. training profile

SY 2015-2016

Teachers Portfolio 5 updated, complete & well-organized4 updated, complete3 updated2 updated but not complete 1 not updated, not complete, not organized

Teachers Individual Portfolio

updated

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assignedOverall rating for accomplishments

______________________ MARJORIE C. MANLOSA Rater Ratee

APPROVING AUTHORITY:

LILY ANN S. GO Principal III

1