3
Car test  R0016A See also R9977 Rover 25 Featuring 1.4i S W E WERE TES TING ROVE R’S SPORTY little hatchback amidst the furore over  BMW’s abandonment of the marriage. If one steps back and tries to assess the product on its merits, rather than its poor image and dubious future prospects, this 1. 4i S vers ion of the re vamped 200 pr oves that it has much to commend it as a warm (if not hot) hatch. Its 103bhp engine is actually a bit slower and thirstier than before but, helped by taller gearing, it’s now a  pa ra go n in te rm s of fl ex ib il it y an d me ch an ic al refinement; it makes all the right noises when stretched through the gears and virtually no noise at all when cruising. The deft gearchange and now-smooth, if still mode ratel y weigh ty , clutc h add to the driver appea l, whilst well-shaped and padded front seats locate and support extreme ly well , even though there are no adjusters for lumbar support or seat height. The only objections will come from lanky types, who will find their heads brushing the roof (at front and rear) and who will find the accelerator too close for comfort. This version’s ima ge and int entions suit the new stiffer suspensio n settings admirably , as well. The ride is unyielding over rough surfaces, it’s true, but the driver enjoys the tenacious grip on 55-Series rubber, with alert response in the steering department and a marked absence of bump-steer. Nevertheles s, we think it was naive to adopt this stiffer set-up on the lower- powered E and L versions, which by thei r  character are ideally suited to the previous 200’s softer settings. Our tape meas ure revea led usefu lly impr oved back seat stretching space for legs – like the new Skoda Fabia, the 25 is a larger-than-average supermini both outside and ins ide . The luggage vol ume wit h sea ts occ upi ed is bet ter than most, as well, at 12.2 cu ft behind the seat. The  backrest is split but it only flops on to the fixed cushion, so front occupants are less secure, in heavy braking for exa mple. In compen sat ion, you can car ry a pla nk ora rol l of carpet on the nearside, up to 2¼m long, if pressed. Luggage security is also a mixed blessing – you can double-lock the tailgate against the central locking and secure boot contents from the interior (the seat releases are in the boot); but if you lock up with the remote handset, then open the tailgate (or driver’s door) by key, the alarm goes off. VERDICT Since its inception as a 214, this small Rover has become much better equipped, significantly cheaper and noticeably more refined in the way it sounds and goes. Sadly, it’s been adversely affected by a largely unjustified, tarnished image. However, unless you want a soft ride and class- leading fue l eco nomy (ne ithe r of whi ch is a stro ng point in it s favour ), the 25 has li tt le mud sticking to it, so far as we’re concerned. March 2000   T   E   S   T   E   X   T   R  A

ROVER-25-1.4IS-MAR00-TESTEXTRA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ROVER-25-1.4IS-MAR00-TESTEXTRA

8/11/2019 ROVER-25-1.4IS-MAR00-TESTEXTRA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rover-25-14is-mar00-testextra 1/3

Car test  R0016A

See also R9977

Rover 25Featuring 1.4i S

WE WERE TESTING ROVER’S SPORTY

little hatchback amidst the furore over 

BMW’s abandonment of the marriage. If one

steps back and tries to assess the product on its merits,

rather than its poor image and dubious future prospects,

this 1.4i S version of the revamped 200 proves that it has

much to commend it as a warm (if not hot) hatch.

Its 103bhp engine is actually a bit slower and thirstier 

than before but, helped by taller gearing, it’s now a

 pa rago n in te rm s of fl ex ib il it y an d me ch an ic al

refinement; it makes all the right noises when stretched

through the gears and virtually no noise at all whencruising. The deft gearchange and now-smooth, if still

moderately weighty, clutch add to the driver appeal,

whilst well-shaped and padded front seats locate and

support extremely well, even though there are no

adjusters for lumbar support or seat height. The only

objections will come from lanky types, who will find

their heads brushing the roof (at front and rear) and who

will find the accelerator too close for comfort.

This version’s image and intentions suit the new

stiffer suspension settings admirably, as well. The ride

is unyielding over rough surfaces, it’s true, but the

driver enjoys the tenacious grip on 55-Series rubber,with alert response in the steering department and a

marked absence of bump-steer. Nevertheless, we think 

it was naive to adopt this stiffer set-up on the

lower-powered E and L versions, which by their 

character are ideally suited to the previous 200’s softer 

settings.

Our tape measure revealed usefully improved backseat

stretching space for legs – like the new Skoda Fabia, the

25 is a larger-than-average supermini both outside and

inside. The luggage volume with seats occupied is better 

than most, as well, at 12.2 cu ft behind the seat. The

 backrest is split but it only flops on to the fixed cushion,

so front occupants are less secure, in heavy braking for 

example. In compensation, you can carry a plank or a roll

of carpet on the nearside, up to 2¼m long, if pressed.

Luggage security is also a mixed blessing – you candouble-lock the tailgate against the central locking and

secure boot contents from the interior (the seat releases

are in the boot); but if you lock up with the remote

handset, then open the tailgate (or driver’s door) by key,

the alarm goes off.

VERDICT

Since its inception as a 214, this small Rover has

become much better equipped, significantly cheaper

and noticeably more refined in the way it sounds and

goes. Sadly, it’s been adversely affected by a largely

unjustified, tarnished image.H o w e v e r , unl e s s y o u w a nt a s o ft r i de a nd

class-leading fuel economy (neither of which is a

strong point in its favour), the 25 has little mud

sticking to it, so far as we’re concerned.

March 2000

  T  E  S  T

  E  X  T

  R A

Page 2: ROVER-25-1.4IS-MAR00-TESTEXTRA

8/11/2019 ROVER-25-1.4IS-MAR00-TESTEXTRA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rover-25-14is-mar00-testextra 2/3

mph

IN 5TH

GEAR

IN 4THGEAR

30

30

4 0

4 0

5 0

5 0

6 0

6 0

70

70

THROUGHTHEGEARS

20 mph

5TH/4THSPEEDRANGES

2.3   4.6   7.3   11.4

7.1   14.9   22.8   32.5

5.1   10.1   15.6   22.0

14.3/10.4   15.7/10.5

14.9/10.1   17.6/11.9

1   3   5

2 4

mph* for best acceleration

REVSPERMINUTE

5th4th

3rd

2nd

1st

6500*   6550   5000

33   87   104

59   110½

FUEL CONSUMPTION

Maximum speeds

2

PERFORMANCE

Acceleration time in seconds

Type of use - with air conditioning off* mpg

Urban (17mph average/heavy traffic) 27½

Suburban (27mph average/6.4 miles from cold start) 33½

Motorway (70mph cruising) 35

Cross-country (brisk driving/20 miles from cold start) 40

Rur al (gentle driv ing/20 miles from cold start) 45½

Typical mpg overall 38

Realistic tank range (not  nominal tank capacity) 42 litres/350 miles

*with air conditioning switched on, consumption will increase by 2  –4% in

winter and 4 –8% in summer 

FOR THE TECHNICAL

ENGINEType  transverse four cylinders inline with all-alloy block and head;

five main bearings

Size 75 x 79mm = 1396cc

Power  103 bhp at 6000rpm

Torque 91 lb ft at 4500 rpm

 Valves belt-driven twin overheadcamshafts actuating four valvesper cylinder via hydraulic tappets

F u e l / i g n i t i o n   e le c t r o n icm u l t i - p oi n t p e t r ol i n j e c t i onintegrated with spark timing anddirect ignit ion (no HT leads)three-way exhaust catalyser and50-litre fuel tank, with low-levelwarning lamp

TRANSMISSIONType   five-speed manual, frontwheel drive (no automatic option)

Mph per 1000rpm 20.9 in 5th;16.9 in 4th

MEASUREMENTS

53

68

399

194*   169

157

126

128  86-132

137

53-74

88-107

97

33

70

( with sunroof )   8895

142

T: typical back seat space behind medium-sized front occupants

10(inner sill)   (outer sill)

41T

T

* 178 with mirrors folded

86

26

188

kerb weight : 1040kg (maker’s figure)

Three-door hatchbackCentimetres

BRAKESPedal feel HandbrakeBehaviour in an emergency

Dry road stopping distance from 50mph (optional ABS not fitted)

 A good-to-average best stop is about 28m at 20-30kg pedal load)

Fade test: pedal load requried for a moderate (34m/.75g) stop:

10kg at start of test, 15kg at end of test  (Ideal brakes show no change)

10m 20mDistance

       P     e 

       d      a 

       l        l     o 

     a        d 

30m

   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _ 38m

   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _ 28m (.92g - best stop)

   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _ 28½m

   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _   _ 31m wheels skidding

40m 50m 60m

9kg

14kg

18kg

16kg

remote control?

auto window closure?

central locking?

deadlocks?

Luggagesecure from interior/hidden

from view

Door lockingSeatbelts

front

rear 

height-adjustablepre-tensioning with load-limiter when airbag fitted

3 inertia-reel belts

Alarm

Ignition switch/immobiliser 

Airbagsdriver passenger others

45 litreoptional

no sidebags

Head restraintsfront

rear 

two front-verticallyremovable and adjustable

optional

Other features  volumesensor for alarm optional;electronic-triggering for airbagsand belt-tensioners at front

Euro NCAP crash testresults

assessment of effective-ness and convenience - the more

blobs the better 

factory fitted optional extra

  standard on this model

not available on this model

No data available

CHASSISSuspension   front: independentdamper/struts with integral coil

s p r ing s . R e a r: t o r s io n b e a m(dead) axle with coil springs. Fronta n t i - ro l l b a r a n d t e l e s c o p i cdampers all round

Steering   rack and pinion withhydraulic power assistance; 3.0turns between full locks. Turningcircle diameter averages 10.3mbetween kerbs, with 15.15m circlefor one turn of the wheel

Wheels   5½J alloy with 185/55R15V tyres (Pirelli P6000 on testcar). Space-saver temporaryspare (full-size wheel/tyre optionalextra)

Brakes   solid discs front, drumsr e ar w i t h v a c u um s e r vo a sstandard. (electronic ABS optionalextra)

SAFETY AND SECURITY FEATURES

Page 3: ROVER-25-1.4IS-MAR00-TESTEXTRA

8/11/2019 ROVER-25-1.4IS-MAR00-TESTEXTRA

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/rover-25-14is-mar00-testextra 3/3

3

HOW THE 25

COMPARES

Engine

(cyl/cap/power

(no/cc/bhp)

Revs at

70mph

(rpm)

30-70mph

through

gears (sec)

30-70mph

in 5th/4th

gears (sec)

Fuel

economy

(mpg)

Brakes

best stop

(m/kg)

Maximum

legroom -

front (cm)

Typical leg/

kneeroom -

rear (cm)

Steering

turns/ (p)

circle (m)

Overall

length

(cm)

ROVER 25i S 4/1396/103 3360 11.4 32.5/22.0 38 28/14 107 97/70 3.0/10.3 399

Ford Fiesta 1.4   4/1388/90 3520 11.1 28.6/18.7 41 28/16 108 92/67 2.9/10.1 383

Citroën Saxo 1.4   4/1360/75 3180 11.5 27.0/118.6 46½ 29/27 105 91/66 3.7/10.7(m) 372

Fiat Punto 1.2 16v*   4/1242/80 3210 11.7 29.7/20.2 41 27/12 108 96/67 2.8/10.85 380/4†

Vauxhall Corsa 1.4 16v   4/1389/90 3620 10.0 23.8/16.1 42 28½/16 104 99/67 2.8/10.4 373

Rover 214 Si (1996 version)   4/1396/103 3530 10.5 26.0/18.4 39½ 28/16 107 94/65 3.4/10.4 397

* performance and economy figures for 1997/99 version (m) manual steering †3/5 door  

© The Automobile Association 2000

Ideal rear wash and (intermittent) ... but no variable intermittent

wipe arrangement sweep up front

Door mirrors give a bigger view ... but are still tetchy to adjust and make the car 

wider than catalogue says (see our table)

Melodic twin windtone horns ... but operating buttons miniscule

(very English)

Rear footwell heater outlets ... but easily blocked by carpet (ours was)

Cold face-level vent delivery ... but the centre vents aim is still awry

with heater on

LIKES AND GRIPES