Upload
jakob-lovins
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ROUTE 72 BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTSROUTE 72 BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
TP 708TP 708
Pre-Proposal MeetingPre-Proposal MeetingMay 2, 2008May 2, 2008
AgendaAgenda
IntroductionIntroduction Existing ConditionsExisting Conditions Preferred AlternativePreferred Alternative QuestionsQuestions
Project LocationProject Location
Project LocationProject Location
Marsha Drive IntersectionMarsha Drive Intersection
Hilliards ThorofareHilliards Thorofare
Manahawkin Bay BridgeManahawkin Bay Bridge
East and West ThorofareEast and West Thorofare
Long Beach Island Business Long Beach Island Business DistrictDistrict
Typical Bridge Lane Typical Bridge Lane ConfigurationConfiguration
Existing Bay BridgeExisting Bay Bridge
2500’ Long, 17 spans2500’ Long, 17 spans 4-Girder System with Transverse 4-Girder System with Transverse
Floor Beams and DeckFloor Beams and Deck Tall Hammerhead Piers on Timber Tall Hammerhead Piers on Timber
Pile FoundationsPile Foundations Generally Good ConditionGenerally Good Condition
Bay Bridge - Typical Fatigue Bay Bridge - Typical Fatigue CracksCracks
Bay Bridge - Fatigue RepairsBay Bridge - Fatigue Repairs
Trestle BridgesTrestle Bridges
Simple Span Precast Concrete I Simple Span Precast Concrete I BeamsBeams
Hilliards Thorofare 475’, 11 spansHilliards Thorofare 475’, 11 spans West Thorofare 368’, 9 spansWest Thorofare 368’, 9 spans East Thorofare 485’, 11 spansEast Thorofare 485’, 11 spans Timber Pile Bent PiersTimber Pile Bent Piers
Trestle BridgesTrestle Bridges
Generally Good ConditionGenerally Good Condition
Trestle Bridges - Typical Pier Trestle Bridges - Typical Pier SpallsSpalls
Trestle BridgesTrestle BridgesUndermining of BearingsUndermining of Bearings
Trestle BridgesTrestle BridgesTypical Pier RepairsTypical Pier Repairs
AlternativesAlternatives
Original IPA Developed in 2005Original IPA Developed in 2005 Original IPA Revised by Smart Original IPA Revised by Smart
SolutionsSolutions
Marsha Drive Improvements - Marsha Drive Improvements - IPAIPA
Add Turning Lane at Marsha DriveAdd Turning Lane at Marsha Drive Prohibit left turn from 72 westboundProhibit left turn from 72 westbound
Previous Previous IPAIPA
Bay BridgeBay BridgeNew parallel BridgeNew parallel BridgeReplace Existing Replace Existing
SuperstructureSuperstructure2 Lanes Full Shoulders 2 Lanes Full Shoulders
each wayeach wayIn the future can In the future can
accommodate 3 lanes accommodate 3 lanes each wayeach way
Revised IPARevised IPABay BridgeBay BridgeNew parallel BridgeNew parallel Bridge2 Lanes and Shoulders 2 Lanes and Shoulders
(wide enough to carry 4 (wide enough to carry 4 11’ Lanes for the 11’ Lanes for the rehabilitation of the rehabilitation of the existing structure)existing structure)
Rehabilitate the Rehabilitate the existing superstructureexisting superstructure
Bike/ped Bike/ped accommodationsaccommodations
Previous Previous IPAIPA
Trestle BridgesTrestle BridgesReplace 3 Trestle Replace 3 Trestle BridgesBridges
Temporary Trestle Temporary Trestle for MPTfor MPT
2 lanes and Full 2 lanes and Full Shoulders each wayShoulders each way
In the future can In the future can accommodate 3 lanes accommodate 3 lanes each wayeach way
Revised IPARevised IPATrestle BridgesTrestle Bridges
Rehabilitate 3 Rehabilitate 3 trestle bridgestrestle bridges
DeckDeckPiersPiersSuperstructureSuperstructureBike/pedBike/pedaccommodationsaccommodations
Preferred lane Preferred lane configuration to beconfiguration to bedetermined determined
Contract SequenceContract Sequence
Cost SummaryCost Summary
PROPOSED IPA
CONTRACTNo.
Total Construction
Cost
CONTRACT 1 Bay Bridge - Minor Rehab & Marsha Drive Intersection 7.34
CONTRACT 2 New Bay Bridge 110.08
CONTRACT 3 Trestle Bridges - Major Rehab 13.57
CONTRACT 4 Bay Bridge - Major Rehab 32.00
* $163 mill
* Price reflects 2007 dollars* Price reflects 2007 dollars
PREVIOUS IPA $235 mill
Proposal ScoringProposal Scoring
STEP 1: Technical ProposalSTEP 1: Technical Proposal40%40%
STEP 2: Oral PresentationSTEP 2: Oral Presentation 60%60%
Federal Goal of 15.6% ESBEFederal Goal of 15.6% ESBE
Technical Proposal Evaluation Technical Proposal Evaluation CriteriaCriteria
Project ManagerProject Manager 20% 20% Key StaffKey Staff 20% 20% Project ApproachProject Approach 40% 40% Firm’s Capability / PerformanceFirm’s Capability / Performance 20% 20%
Oral Presentation Evaluation Oral Presentation Evaluation CriteriaCriteria
Team OrganizationTeam Organization 40 pts.40 pts. Results Oriented StrategiesResults Oriented Strategies 70 pts.70 pts. Project Schedule/Network LogicProject Schedule/Network Logic 50 pts.50 pts. Risk Analysis StrategiesRisk Analysis Strategies 30 pts.30 pts. Project Management StrategiesProject Management Strategies 20 pts.20 pts.
(Scope, schedule, budget and Quality)(Scope, schedule, budget and Quality)
Total Points for Oral PresentationTotal Points for Oral Presentation 210 pts.210 pts.
Questions?Questions?