Upload
john-garretson
View
268
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Analysis of vibration due to rotor unbalance using a SpectraQuest Machine Fault Simulator
Citation preview
Rotor Analysis Using SpectraQuest
Acoustical Testing I
Professor: Doug Jones and Dominique Chéenne
Written By John Garretson
Additional Group Members:
Marek Kovacik
Chris Kaiser
Josh Rivkin
Abstract
Tests were performed on a SpectraQuest Machinery Fault
Simulator to determine the effects of various rotor
configurations on the spectrum and waveform of a running
machine in the vertical plane. Configurations included
changes to location, weight distributions and quality of
rotors. Tests showed that amplitude increases as
imbalanced rotors are introduced and a visible envelope
from the rotor unbalance can be seen in the waveforms.
1. Introduction
Marek Kovacik, Chris Kaiser, Josh Rivkin,
and John Garretson used SpectraQuest
software and Machine Fault Simulator to
analyze the vibration in the vertical
plane associated with varying rotor
configurations.
2. Methods
2.1 Test Equipment
SpectraQuest Machine Fault Simulator
Image 1 Machine Fault Simulator
Image 2 MFS Rear view
The Machine Fault Simulator, MFS, is
used in conjunction with a computer
running SpectraQuest VPro data
acquisition software on an
accelerometer array. For the purpose
of our tests, only one accelerometer
was used, measuring the vertical axis.
Additional test equipment required for
the Rotor Unbalance test consisted of a
flexible helical beam coupler, a drive
shaft and two bearings, two golden
balanced rotors, one blue cocked rotor,
two screws used as unbalancing weight,
a .001in. displacement gauge, and a
strobe light.
2.2 Frequency Calculation
Testing required that the MFS be run at
10 Hz, 30 Hz, and 60 Hz. In order to
obtain the proper frequencies a strobe
light was used. Unfortunately the strobe
measured rpm, not Hz, and was not
able to go to a high enough rpm, 3600,
to match 60 Hz. To accurately
calculate the frequency of the spinning
shaft the strobe light was first set to 600
rpm, which is 10 Hz. When the shaft
appeared to stop moving in the strobe
the shaft was moving at 10Hz. Because
the strobe did not go beyond
approximately 1500 rpm this same
method couldn’t be used to calculate
30 Hz and 60 Hz. Instead, two different
marks were made on the coupler 180
degrees apart and the strobe was set to
900 rpm, or 15 Hz. When the marks on
the shaft stop moving and don’t
alternate between each other it means
that the shaft is moving at a frequency
that is an octave 15 Hz. The first octave,
15 Hz, was skipped, and the speed of
the motor was increased until the
second time the shaft “stopped” in the
strobe. This is when the shaft is spinning
at 30 Hz. The third octave, 45 Hz, was
again skipped and the speed increased
until the fourth time the shaft “stopped”
in the strobe, which is when it was
running at 60 Hz. Each time the correct
frequency was attained, the level that
the motor was running at on its digital
readout was recorded and used later to
reproduce each frequency.
2.3 Test Setups
Tests were performed using the
guidelines in Exercise No. 7 in the
Applied Vibration Analysis Laboratory
Exercises manual. All test setups were
examined at 10Hz, 30Hz, and 60Hz. A
diagram showing the relative locations
of the various test equipment is shown
below.
Figure 1 Diagram of various test setups orientations.
2.3.1 Baseline Center
The first test setup required that both
good rotors be placed on the shaft and
tested with no weight, seen in Image 3.
Image 3
2.3.2 Weighted Inline Center Inner
Next, weights are added to each rotor,
on the same plane, on the inner
diameter, shown in Image 4.
Image 4
2.3.3 Weighted Offset Center
Then, one of the weights was removed
and offset ninety degrees from its
original alignment with the other weight,
shown in Image 6.
Image 5
2.3.4 Baseline Cocked Center
Next, all weight was removed and the
cocked rotor was installed between the
outboard rotor and the outboard
bearing, as seen in Image 7 below.
Image 6
2.3.5 Weighted Cocked Center
Then, weight was added to the cocked
rotor, shown here in Image 8.
Image 7
2.3.6 Baseline Over
Then, all the rotors were removed from
their centerhung position and one of
the balanced rotors was place beyond
the outboard bearing, in the overhung
position, shown in Image 9 below.
Image 8
2.3.7 Weighted Over
Next, one of the weights was added to
the outer diameter of the overhung
rotor, shown below in Image 10.
Image 9
2.3.8 Baseline Cocked Over
The balanced rotor was then removed
and replace with the cocked rotor with
no weights in it, shown in Image 11.
Image 10
2.3.9 Weighted Cocked Over
The final test setup consisted of weight
being added to the cocked rotor in the
overhung position.
Image 11
3. Results
3.1 Waveform Analysis
Comparisons of the data from
unbalanced rotor testing to balanced
rotor testing data shows that
unbalanced rotors produce larger
amplitudes when driven at the same
frequency as balanced rotors. This can
be seen in Figure 2 below by the larger
red peaks in the top graph than the
green waveform the red waveform is
compared to.
Figure 2 Comparison of Balanced to Unbalanced Rotors
When the speed of motor was
increased from 10Hz to 30Hz and from
30Hz to 60Hz amplitude increased in the
resulting waveforms. The density of the
spikes in the waveforms also increased
proportionally to the increase in speed.
This can be seen in Figure 3.
Figure 3 Comparison of 60Hz in the upper waveform to 10Hz in the lower waveform.
Below, in Figure 4, it is shown that the
cocked rotor has little change to the
vertical plane’s waveform. What can
be seen is that an unbalanced rotor has
visible envelope from its unbalance.
Figure 4 Comparison of Cocked Rotor to Unbalanced Rotor in the same position. The unbalanced waveform has a visible enveloped created from its unbalance.
3.2 Spectral Analysis
When changing the orientation of the
rotors from the “centerhung” to the
“overhung” position the data shows that
the centerhung position is much noisier
around 1 kHz than the overhung as
shown by Figure 5 below.
Figure 5 Comparison of Overhung vs. Centerhung Balanced Rotors. The top graph, Centerhung, has a lot more energy around 1 kHz than Overhung graph on the bottom.
When the weight was shifted 90 degrees
on one of the unbalanced rotors a
strong peak developed around the 20
Hz range in the spectrum which was not
present when the weights were inline.
This can be seen in Figure 6 on the next
page.
Figure 6 Comparison of 90 degree weight shifted Rotor with inline unbalanced rotor.
When comparing the cocked rotor to
the unbalanced rotor spectrums from
the overhung position the 20 Hz spike is
seen again in both but is much more
prominent in the unbalanced rotor than
in the cocked rotor.
Figure 7 Comparing Cocked vs. Unbalanced Overhung
When the unweighted overhung
cocked rotor’s spectrum was compared
to the weighted overhung cocked
rotor’s spectrum, the weighted cocked
rotor acts very much like an
unbalanced non-cocked rotor as far as
the data of a single accelerometer in
the vertical plane is concerned, again
showing a very strong spike at 20Hz.
Figure 8 Comparing Cocked Rotors in the Overhung position, the upper spectrum has a weight on the rotor and the lower spectrum is unweighted.
4. Discussion
Though most of the data shows that the
cocked rotor acts very similarly to a
regular rotor this is inaccurate. The
reason it appears this way is because
only one accelerometer was used
during the testing, so only one
dimension was begin tested. If an
accelerometer was used in the
horizontal plane the reverse would
probably be true, meaning the cocked
rotor would show much more of an
impact on the results and the
unbalanced rotor would be negligible.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, the data shows that
amplitude increases as the speed of the
motor increases as well as when an
unbalanced rotor is present. More
peaks are seen in the waveform as the
frequency of the shaft increases, and
the amount of peaks is directly
proportional to the increase in
frequency. The data showed that a
cocked rotor doesn’t have much of an
effect on the plane it is perpendicular
to. The data also shows the trend of a
strong 20 Hz component in unbalanced
rotors in the overhung position and the
envelope created by unbalanced
rotors.