Romanism and the Harlot Church

8/2/2019 Romanism and the Harlot Church

1/24

Veritas News Service Exclusive

05/20/11

Romanism & The Harlot Church:

Part: 1 scratching the surface

by Todd Stevens

That is faith if I ever saw it

You will have to pardon me for anything that you may find of

great importance to be left out. Nothing in this article is

purposefully omitted and to the extent of this article only so muchcan be covered. The full history and influence of the Vatican

Romanism could only be uncovered through novels that would

have to have multiple volumes.

First off there needs to be some clarification in definitions,

Catholic has developed the connotation of being particularly

Christian but in truth the word itself actually means: catholic

adjective

1. broad or wide-ranging in tastes, interests, orthelike; having

sympathies with all; broad-minded;liberal.

2. universal in extent; involving all; of interest to all.

3. pertaining to the whole Christian body or church.
http://c/browse/thehttp://c/browse/thehttp://c/browse/thehttp://c/browse/liberalhttp://c/browse/liberalhttp://c/browse/liberalhttp://www.hourofthetime.com/wordpresstest/?attachment_id=5283http://c/browse/liberalhttp://c/browse/the


2/24

The Roman Catholic religion can actually be argued to have

started before the death and resurrection of Jesus and its first

origins derived from the pantheon of Gods it first held connection

to; this makes more sense when the definition term describes it as:

broad or wide ranging in tastes; universal in extent; involving all.

If it involves all then it cannot be Christian by its very definition,

seeing as how Christianity is a monotheistic religion.

The Vatican is one of the most corrupt, evil, pagan, institutions on

the face of the planet. They are one of the key spiritual leaders in

the Illuminati, that play an instrumental role as sheep herder for

the masses that follow every little decree and Papal Bull that theyput out. They literally alter societies. This is perfectly evident if

you look at a majority of the South American cultures that are

Catholic, as well as, the European cultures that follow them. With

their guilt trip of decrying birth control as a sin in Latin America

along with the limitations on abortion you get over 5,000womens death due to illegal abortion in these countries. This is

not an avocation for abortion but merely an example of the control

over even the most personal aspects of individuals lives that theVatican can control from their own Sovereign City-State of the

Vatican. This is nothing in comparison to the mental and spiritual

aspects of life that the Vatican has wielded throughout the world

since the days of Constantine.

Despite popular humor the Hallmark Card Company did notinvent holidays like Easter, Christmas, and Halloween and neither

did the Vatican. What the Vatican did do was pull MysteryBabylon traditions into their belief structure attracting pagan

believers in older days and now more recently have pulled the

wool over the eyes of millions causing them to unwittinglypractice a pagan holiday. You could say that its just a holiday,

its all in fun but this does not sit well with me. A deception such

as this, where millions of people do something just because it has

been passed down from a church seems like a form of masshypnosis to me. This is also not an attack on anyone elses form of


3/24

worship. It is pointing out who the liars of this world are. Those

that lie and deceive people are truly the practitioners of the

Lucifierian doctrine. For humanity to move forward all lies must

be dispelled. This is also not a form of preaching telling you not to

have fun on these holidays if you choose to do so. The

information in this article is only intended to make those aware

who may not be of the origins of these holidays and rituals.

Revelation chapter 17:1-7

I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that

sitteth upon many waters: with whom the kings of the earth have

committed fornication and the inhabitants of the earth have been

made drunk with the wine of her fornicationI saw a woman sit

upon a scarlet colored beast, full of names of blasphemy havingseven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple

and scarlet color, and decked with gold and precious stones and

pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and

filthiness of her fornication:

And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY,

BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND

ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and

with the blood of martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her I

wondered with great admiration.

Whether it be self fulfilling prophecy or a direct connection tobiblical revelation the Vatican honestly has so many striking

parallels to this that it can not be overlooked.

The pantheon in Rome which was once used for Roman/Greek

gods has been transformed by the Roman/Catholic church into a

hall of saints. These saints are worshipped or what the Catholic

Church likes to call venerated or adorned. In the Roman Catholic

Church this has been set forth in mass to prayer to the Virgin


4/24

Mary in the rosary prayer. It is described by James A. Wylie in

The Papacy London 1852 pg 370 that The same worship is

rendered to Mary as to Christ. Churches are built to her honour;

her shrines are crowded with devotees; enriched with their gifts;

and adorned with their votive offerings. To her prayers are

addressed to divine being, and blessings are asked as to one that

has power to bestow to them. Her votarers are taught to praySpare Us, Good Lady and from all evil deliver us good Lady.

(pg 370) Again it is not a matter of what, who or how anyone

prays but rather it is what the Vatican claims and what they

perpetuate. Moving on, to further these introductory connections

Alexander Hislop describes in his book The Two Babylons thatthis ancient Cup that the harlot holds derives its origins in

Babylon itself thus we have the first instance of seeing suchimagery derived from ancient Babylon, as they were exhibited

in Greece; for thus was the Greek Venus originallyrepresented further saying that and it is singular that in our

own day, and so far as appears for the first time, the Roman

Church has actually taken this very symbol as her own chosen

emblem. In 1825, on occasion of the jubilee, Pope Leo XII struck

a medal, bearing on the one side his own image, and on the other,that of the Church of Rome symbolized as a Woman, holding in

her left hand a cross, and in her right a CUP, with the legendaround her, Sedet super universum, The whole world is her

seat (pg 10).

The Confession as a borrowing of Babylonian Mystery

One of the largest extents to which the Papacy has fallen from

grace is within the fact that worship has also been transform from

a God or higher sense of being into a reverence for the papacy

itself. This is seen clearly in the statues all around the Vatican

towards odd occult symbology, saints, and popes. In a more direct

fashion it is encapsulated in the confessional. Instead of seeking

patients and forgiveness from themselves or God they are nowdirected to the priesthood for forgiveness as if they have special


5/24

powers above man. A former Roman priest Charles Chinquy

describes as a child how this was imposed upon him This week,

you will send your children to confession. Make them understand

that this action is one of the most important of their lives, and that

for every one of them, it will decide their eternal happiness or

misery. Fathers and mothers, if, through your fault, or his own,

your child is guilty of a bad confession if he conceals his sins and

commences lying to the priest, who holds the place of God

Himself, this sin is often irreparable. The devil will take

possession of his heart: he will become accustomed to lie to his

father confessor, or rather to Jesus Christ, of whom he is a

representative. His life will be a series of sacrileges; his death andeternity those of the reprobate. Teach him, therefore, to examine

thoroughly his actions, words and thoughts, in order to confesswithout disguise(Chinquy 20). He goes on to express his

personal feeling at the time

I was in the church of St. Thomas when these words fell upon me

like a thunderbolt. I had often heard my mother say, when at

home and my aunt since I had come to St. Thomas that upon thefirst confession depended my eternal happiness or misery. That

week was, therefore, to decide about my eternity (Chinquy 20).

What a terrible burden to put on the mind and soul of a child.

How truly sick it is to deceive a child into thinking that talking to

a priest about every little sin they could have done would

somehow open or close the gates of eternal heaven. Shame on thePriesthood!

According to Hislop this is again taken directly from the traditions

of Babylon Thus the people, wherever the Babylonian system

spread, were bound neck and heel to the priests. The priests were

the only depositaries of religious knowledge; they only had the

true tradition by which the writs and symbols of the public

religion could be interpreted; and without blind and implicit

submission to them, what was necessary for salvation could not beknown. Now compare this with the early history of the Papacy,


6/24

and with its spirit and modus operandi throughout, and how exact

was the coincidence! Was it in a period of patriarchal light that thecorrupt system of the Babylonian Mysteries began?(Hislop

11). It is also described in the next instance that this was going on

from the beginning days of the apostles

when martyrs were sealing their testimony for the truth with

their blood. Even then, when the Gospel shone so brightly, theSpirit of God bore this clear and distinct testimony by Paul: THE

MYSTERY OF INIQUITY DOTH ALREADY WORK (2 Thess

2:7).(Hislop 11).

In contrast you see that Rome had its form of confession

developed That confessional was itself borrowed from Babylon.

The confession required of the votaries of Rome is entirelydifferent from the confession prescribed in the Word of God. The

dictate of Scripture in regard to confession is, Confess your

faults one to another (James 5:16), (Hislop 18.) This also being

so in Greece : All the Greeks, from Delphi to Thermopylae,

were initiated in the Mysteries of the temple of Delphi. Theirsilence in regard to everything they were commanded to keep

secret was secured both by the fear of the penalties threatened to a

perjured revelation, and by the general CONFESSION exacted of

the aspirants after initiationa confession which caused them

greater dread of the indiscretion of the priest, than gave him

reason to dread theirindiscretion.(Hislop 12).

Now why is confessional of any importance at all? It is all takenback from basic mystery religions that developed through timefrom the Assyrians to the Egyptians, moving on and finding

place with the Greeks and Romans and is now found within the

Church of today. As described, Without such confession, in the

Church of Rome, there can be no admission to the Sacraments,

any more than in the days of Paganism there could be admissionwithout confession to the benefit of the Mysteries. Now, this

confession is made by every individual, in SECRECY AND IN


7/24

SOLITUDE, to the priest sitting in the name and clothed with the

authority of God, invested with the power to examine the

conscience, to judge the life, to absolve or condemn according to

his mere arbitrary will and pleasure. This is the grand pivot onwhich the whole Mystery of iniquity,(Hislop 11). The power to

which a group gains through the confession of another is

tremendous. Your life is in their hands they are the gatekeepers of

your soul. They hold you morally hostage to their will and

pleasure; which is the spirit within the mystery that they hold

above others. Your secrets are theirs. Lesser degrees of mystery

are delegated to the initiate and the priesthood hangs on to the

rest.

Even in the Greek and Roman cultures their arithmetic and

mythological culture was collected through the Assyrian and

Babylonian culture. In this it shows how cultures use and borrow

bits and pieces to formulate a society of their own. In this it also

reflects the structure and direction that this culture will assumeWhat is wanted in one country is supplemented in another; and

what actually crops out in different directions, to a large extentnecessarily determines the character of much that does not

directly appear on the surface. Taking, then, the admitted unity

and Babylonian character of the ancient Mysteries of Egypt,

Greece, Phoenicia, and Rome, as the clue to guide us in our

researches, (Hislop 19). Modern arithmetic would not come into

existence until the Muslim culture would rise in the 6th and 7th

centuries.

Hindu religion from an original worship to a Caste system

Has a cultural fall from grace occurred before and can it be seen in

a more recent instance? In Alexander Hislops work there is one

such culture that can be seen when studying further, this cultures

beginning. The Hindu culture is one of the oldest civilizations thatcan be seen and read from dating back at least 5000 years. Their

Supreme Being Brahma was once thought of as a gracious


8/24

character of God, as revealed in His dealings with a lost and guilty

world. This is manifest from the very name Brahm, appropriatedby them to the one infinite and eternal God. (Hislop 18). It would

also be once seen that the universal Lord,from the connection

between Rahm the womb and Rahm the merciful one? Here,

then, we find that Brahm is just the same as Er-Rahman, The

all-merciful one,a title applied by the Turks to the Most High,

and that the Hindoos, notwithstanding their deep religious

degradation now, had once known that the most holy, most high

God, is also The God of Mercy, in other words, that he is a

just God and a Savior (Hislop 18). This however would not last

and a subsequent degradation would occur were the beliefstructure would move into a priestly caste system in which theBrahmins would exalt themselves as a priestly, half-divine

caste, to whom all others ought to bow down, have for many ages

taught that, while the other castes came from the arms, and body

and feet of Brahmathe visible representative and manifestation of

the invisible Brahm, and identified with himthey alone camefrom the mouth of the creative God(Hislop 19).

The Holy Trinity in Ancient Worship

The borrowing of the Holy Trinity also has nothing to do with

Father, Son, and Holy Ghost but is rather another usage of the

Hindu and Buddhist that got their traditions through mystery

origin. In India, the supreme divinity, in like manner, in one of themost ancient cave-temples, is represented with three heads on one

body, under the name of Eko Deva Trimurtti, One God, threeforms. You can also see this as Brahma (the supreme Godhead)

Shiva (the destroyer) and Vishnu (savior) also avatars as Krishna

and Rama this in the Hindu is referred to as the Trimurti. In Japan,

the Buddhists worship their great divinity, Buddha, with three

heads, in the very same form, under the name of San Pao Fuh In

another fashion it is the trinity of Isis, Osiris, and Horace.


9/24

The Mother and the Child

One of the most prevalent symbols in the Vatican is the Mother

Child imagery of Mary and Christ. It is even admitted that InPapal Italy, as travelers universally admit (except where the

Gospel has recently entered), all appearance of worshipping the

King Eternal and Invisible is almost extinct, while the Mother and

the Child are the grand objects of worship (Hislop 22). Mind you

this book was written in 1852, with the prevalence being much

higher now. This Mother Child symbolism comes from multiplesources such as In India, even to this day, as Isi and Iswara; in

Asia, as Cybele and Deoius; in Pagan Rome, as Fortuna andJupiter-puer, or Jupiter, the boy; in Greece, as Ceres, the Great

Mother, with the babe at her breast, or as Irene, the goddess of

Peace, with the boy Plutus in her arms; and even in Tibet, in

China, and Japan, the Jesuit missionaries were astonished to find

the counterpart of Madonna and her child as devoutly worshipped

as in Papal Rome itself; Shing Moo, the Holy Mother in China,

being represented with a child in her arms, and a glory around her,

exactly as if a Roman Catholic artist had been employed to set herup.

Isis and Osiris, as the child called most frequently Horus.BUNSEN (Hislop 22).
http://www.hourofthetime.com/wordpresstest/?attachment_id=5286http://www.hourofthetime.com/wordpresstest/?attachment_id=5284


10/24

Christmas is not just a coincidence

Despite certain films and books that have been floating around the

birth date of Jesus has no historical or scripture basis to it. It is

more accurate that he was born before the winter this beingbecause in scripture it describes At the time that the angel

announced His birth to the shepherds of Bethlehem, they werefeeding their flocks by night in the open fields (Hislop 85). The

shepherds would not be out feeding their flocks in the dead of

winter in Palestine because of piercing weather. It is actually more

accurately described that since The first rain falls in the month

Marchesvan, which answers to the latter part of our October andthe former part of NovemberFrom whence it appears that Christ

must be born before the middle of October(Hislop 85). Anyways

there are enough scholars out there to find this out from if one

were to feel the need to do so. The true origins again fall from

Mystery Babylon worship falling on the Winter Solstice and the

Druidic Yule-day of the Mother goddess worship as describe byHislop The time of the year, and the ceremonies with which it is

still celebrated, prove its origin. In Egypt, the son of Isis, theEgyptian title for the queen of heaven, was born at this very time,about the time of the winter solstice. The very name by which

Christmas is popularly known among ourselvesYule-dayprovesat once its Pagan and Babylonian origin. Yule is the Chaldee

name for an infant or little child; * and as the 25th of

December was called by our Pagan Anglo-Saxon ancestors,Yule-day, or the Childs day, and the night that preceded it,Mother-night, long before they came in contact with

Christianity, that sufficiently proves its real character (85). This

is also seen in the celebratory aspects of the ending of the yearand sun worship Far and wide, in the realms of Paganism, was

this birth-day observed. This festival has been commonly believed

to have had only an astronomical character, referring simply to the

completion of the suns yearly course, and the commencement of

a new cycle (Hislop 85).


11/24

Easter

This celebration also has no basis in scripture and is more likely

derived from pagan worship of Astarte, queen Beltis, and the

Druidic worship of the priest of the groves, once againdescribed that this Easter is nothing else than Astarte, one of the

titles of Beltis, the queen of heaven, whose name, as pronounced

by the people Nineveh, was evidently identical with that now incommon use in this country. That name, as found by Layard on

the Assyrian monuments, is Ishtar. The worship of Bel and

Astarte was very early introduced into Britain, along with the

Druids, the priests of the groves(Hislop 93).

Marys ascension

Mary other than being the mother of Christ has really no divinity

attributed to her in scripture. There is no instance other than the

Immaculate Conception in which she is shown any source of holy

power. Yet the Vatican still has celebration and worship given to

her as some form of goddess figure. They follow this type ofworship in the feast of Assumption were it is taught that the

Virgin Mary saw no corruption, that in body and in soul she was

carried up to heaven, and now is invested with all power inheaven and in earth. This doctrine has been unblushingly avowed

in the face of the British public, in a recent pastoral of the Popish

Archbishop of Dublin. This doctrine has now received the stamp

of Papal Infallibility, having been embodied in the late

blasphemous decree that proclaims the ImmaculateConception(Hislop 111). This is in following the Babylonian

school of thought that corresponds with APOLLODORUS. We

have seen that the great goddess, who was worshipped in Babylon

as The Mother, was in reality the wife of Ninus, the great god,

the prototype of Bacchus. In conformity with this, we find a

somewhat similar story told of Ariadne, the wife of Bacchus, as isfabled of Semele his mother. The garment of Thetis, says

Bryant, contained a description of some notable achievements in


12/24

the first ages; and a particular account of the apotheosis, of

Ariadne, who is described, whatever may be the meaning of it, ascarried by Bacchus to heaven (Hislop 111). Interestingly enough

there is another momentous occasion that the Vatican could

possibly be celebrating on this Assumption Day; on this day in theyear 1534 The Society of Jesus was constituted (Paris 22).

Although they had been around for a period of time already this

was the official appointment to office.

Mithraic origins of sacrament

One of the first wide spread religious practices in the Roman

world was Mithraism, which was practice from the 1st to the 5th

century. Although it was never declared an official religion it was

practiced by many of the soldiers and was widely accepted amongthe people, as were multiple other Gods of the time. In Roman

Catholic religion certain practices are derived directly from thisMithraic worship. As described on gotquestions.org One of the

key features of Mithraism was a sacrificial meal, which involved

eating the flesh and drinking the blood of a bull. Mithras, the godof Mithraism, was present in the flesh and blood of the bull, and

when consumed, granted salvation to those who partook of thesacrificial meal (theophagy, the eating of ones god). Mithraism

also had seven sacraments, making the similarities between

Mithraism and Roman Catholicism too many to ignore

(gotquestions.org 1).

These instances of pagan worship are of importance because ofthe separation from you and your own personal God. (Whatever

creator you may believe in) By deceptive tactics and creating the

mediator of the priesthood to the people your personal connection

is lost and the control is being put back in the hands of an initiate.

And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints,

and with the blood of martyrs of JesusRev: 17:6


13/24

Although the Roman Catholic Church proclaims its lineage from

St. Peter after being delegated priesthood from Christ there is no

actual biblical reference to this. There is also no biblical referenceto the papacy, worship / adoration of Mary (or the immaculate

conception of Mary, the perpetual virginity of Mary, the

assumption of Mary, or Mary as co-redemptory and mediatory),

petitioning saints in Heaven for their prayers, apostolic

succession, the ordinances of the church functioning as

sacraments, infant baptism, confession of sin to a priest,

purgatory, indulgences, or the equal authority of church traditionand Scripture (gotquestions.org). This Roman universal church

that claims its lineage from a Saint, and venerates their saints nowhas an awful lot of explaining to do with regards to there

treatment of saints and apostles during the first five centuries after

Christ death.

Although the first rock on which the Catholic Church is said to be

founded is St. Peter, it is the fault of Romanism that Peter wouldbe martyred. The ultimate responsibility for decreeing that

Simon/Peter would die comes from the emperor Nero and thusfrom the Roman universal church itself.

The next person to have their blood shed in the line of Christian

martyrdom is St. Stephan. As described in Foxes Book of

Martyrdom, which will herein be referenced as FBM; His death

was occasioned by the faithful manner in which he preached theGospel to the betrayers and murderers of Christ. To such a degree

of madness were they excited, that they cast him out of the cityand stoned him to death (FBM 2). This persecution would not

end with Stephan and Luke describes that there was a great

persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and that

they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea

and Samaria, except the apostles. About two thousand Christians,

with Nicanor, one of the seven deacons, suffered martyrdom

during the persecution that arose about Stephen (FBM 3).


14/24

The Apostle Paul would also suffer death at the decree of emperor

Nero Paul, the apostle, who before was called Saul, after his

great travail and unspeakable labors in promoting the Gospel of

Christ, suffered also in this first persecution under Nero. Abdias

declareth that under his execution Nero sent two of his esquires,

Ferega and Parthemius, to bring him word of his death (FBM 3).

The Apostle John was killed also in the court of Rome Thebeloved disciple, was brother to James the Great. The churches

of Smyrna, Pergamos, Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea, and

Thyatira, were founded by him. From Ephesus he was ordered to

be sent to Rome, where it is affirmed he was cast into a cauldronof boiling oil (FBM 4).

The first persecution of the Church took place in the year 67,under Nero, the sixth emperor of Rome (FBM 5). After setting the

city on fire claim to want to see destruction to all ends if his

demise was to come the masses grew angry and he would blame

the entire thing on the Christians. The persecution that followed

would even receive the sympathy of the Romans as statedbarbarities exercised on the Christians were such as even excited

the commiseration of the Romans themselves. Nero even refined

upon cruelty, and contrived all manner of punishments for the

Christians that the most infernal imagination could design. In

particular, he had some sewed up in skins of wild beasts, and then

worried by dogs until they expired; and others dressed in shirtsmade stiff with wax, fixed to axletrees, and set on fire in his

gardens, in order to illuminate them. This persecution was generalthroughout the whole Roman Empire; but it rather increased than

diminished the spirit of Christianity. In the course of it, St. Pauland St. Peter were martyred (FBM 5).

The Second Persecution under Domitian in 81 A.D. would see

again more cruel death and among the numerous martyrs that

suffered during this persecution was Simeon, bishop of Jerusalem,


15/24

who was crucified; and St. John, who was boiled in oil (FBM

5).

There would subsequently be 10 periods of persecution to come

from the Roman emperors to be had on the Christians of the timethat would not end until Constantine would declare the Roman

Empire a Christian empire and starting the Roman Catholic

Church.

The Third Persecution, Under Trajan, A.D. 108

The Fourth Persecution, Under Marcus Aurelius Antonius,

A.D. 162

The cruelties used in this persecution were such that many of the

spectators shuddered with horror at the sight, and were astonished

at the intrepidity of the sufferers. Some of the martyrs were

obliged to pass, with their already wounded feet, over thorns,

nails, sharp shells, etc. upon their points, others were scourged

until their sinews and veins lay bare, and after suffering the most

excruciating tortures that could be devised, they were destroyedby the most terrible deaths(FBM 7).

The Fifth Persecution, Commencing with Severus, A.D. 192

The Sixth Persecution, Under Maximus, A.D. 235

The Seventh Persecution, Under Decius, A.D. 249

The Eighth Persecution, Under Valerian, A.D. 257

The Ninth Persecution under Aurelian, A.D. 274

The Tenth Persecution, Under Diocletian, A.D. 303

These were the persecutions of the Roman Empire and some

could say that this has little to do with the papacy but after the

combining of the Christianity into the Roman Empire this


16/24

institution would later itself gain power and unleash persecutions

of their own.

In A.D. 1147 there would be a reformation movement coming

from Henry of Toulouse and Ralph Waldo or Valdo of Lyons.They and their followers would be excommunicated andpersecuted because they would not admit of any proofs relative

to religion, but what could be deduced from the Scripturesthemselves, the popish party gave them the name of apostolics. At

length, Peter Waldo, or Valdo, a native of Lyons, eminent for his

piety and learning, became a strenuous opposition of popery

(FBM 31). This would be the beginning of Inquisition of yourfaith The proceedings of Waldo and the reformed, occasioned the

first rise of the inquisitors; for Pope Innocent III authorized

certain monks as inquisitors,(FBM 32).

From this point on the Papacy would move forward much in this

fashion toward anyone who would deny the papacy. For further

reference to this see:

The Bartholomew Massacre at Paris,

The Persecution during the time of Queen Mary in England

Persecutions of Martin Luther and John Calvin

And if you search pretty much any European country and add

persecution to you will find a form of papal inquisition attached to

it.

But at this point I would like to end and pick up in the 15th and

16th century with the rise of the Opus Dei, Knights of Malta, and

the Jesuit order and continue into modern era in Part 2.


17/24

Veritas News Service Exclusive

05/23/11

Romanism and the Harlot Church Pt.2The Popes Henchmen

In thinking of these groups it would be beneficial to recall CarrollQuigleys book Evolution of Civilizations. In his first chapters he

describes how institutions are created and eventually become a

means by which to perpetuate their own sustainability and

economic control. His analogy was how the college football teams

started in the early 20th century as a means for college students to

exercise but would eventually evolve into the advertised moneymaking machines that we see today where the goal is no longer

exercise but rather to make money and gain more control over the

industry that they have created. This is quite fitting and has stayed

in my mind since the moment I read it. Although many groups

like the Knights Hospitallers may have at one point started tobenefit the poor and downtrodden they have evolve and now serve

only to perpetuate themselves and further the aims of the Vatican

itself.

As with all secret societies and initiated orders the top down

hierarchy must have dupes and adepts to do their bidding with

unquestioning certainty. The oldest order of the Vatican, aside

from the priesthood itself, to inflict military and religioussubversion would have to be the Sovereign Military Hospitaller
http://www.hourofthetime.com/wordpresstest/?attachment_id=5316


18/24

Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and Malta, also

broken down and referred to as the Order of St. John and more

commonly The Knights of Malta. The order would first gain its

more chivalric presence as the St. Johns of Jerusalem and the

Knights Hospitaller which was founded in Jerusalem in 1050 A.D.

to provide care and medical attention for poor and sick pilgrims.

This group would gain its order from the Bull of Pascal Feb 3,

1113. They would then be delegated as three distinct brotherhoods

under this order:

-The military brothers

-The infirmary brothers

-The Chaplin brothers

This group would then recruit from the knights from the Crusades

and gain separate stance as their own order able to set up hospitals

and churches. They would set up as a military arm of the Vatican

and help to fend off attacks in Tripoli, Cyprus, and Acre which

they would eventually lose to the Turks in 1291. The order wouldmove to Rhodes were they would begin going under the name of

the Knights of Rhodes until their fall to Salyman II in 1522. After

facing defeat they would return to Europe and ask Charles V of

Spain to give them Malta, which he did in 1530, thus the

beginning of the Knights of Malta.

Despite the orders most humbling of begins they have evolved

into there own self perpetuating institution and along with theJesuits and Opus Dei would become a main antagonist in the way

of world order. In the essence of saving time I will move things

forward to more recent events and tactics by the Jesuits, Knights,and Opus Dei, remembering that they are all the same and all

work toward the same goal a New World Order. (Cooper 86).

It seems that the Vatican Popes from times passed were well

aware of the infiltration of these orders to disrupt the world. In


19/24

1738 Pope Clement XII issued a Papal Bull which stated that

any Catholic who became a Mason would be excommunicated

and in 1884 Pope Leo XIII issued a proclamation stating that

Masonry was one of the secret societies attempting to revive the

manners and customs of the pagan and establish Satans

kingdom on Earth (Cooper 87). Seeing the influence and practice

of such rituals within the church it would be safe to assume that

the infiltration succeeded and is full being controlled by those

who the Popes warned against. According the William CooperPope John Paul XXII is a member of the Illuminati. The best

indication of infiltration is that on November 27, 1983, the Pope

retracted all of the Papal Bulls against Freemasonry and allowedCatholics, after several hundred years, to again become membersof secret societies (Cooper 87).

This being extremely dangerous because they are a sovereign

military order that holds diplomatic relations with 104 countries,

with numerous ambassadors. It issues its own passports, currency,stamps and even vehicle registration plates. The Sovereign

Military Order of Malta has a permanent presence in 120countries, with 12 Grand Priories and Sub-Priories and 47 national

Associations, as well as numerous hospitals, medical centers, day

care centers, first aid corps, and specialist foundations, which

operate in 120 countries. Its 13,000 members and 80,000

volunteers and over 20,000 medical personneldoctors, nurses

and paramedicsare dedicated to the care of the poor, the sick,

the elderly, the disabled, the homeless, terminal patients, lepers,

and all those who suffer. The Order is especially involved in

helping victims of armed conflicts and natural disasters by

providing medical assistance, caring for refugees, and distributing

medicines and basic equipment for survival. (Wikipedia) They

also hold their own seat within the United Nations. They can

travel freely in and out of states without any repercussion for their

action because of this diplomatic immunity. This also strikes as

being very similar to the Red Cross and their flag is quite similaras well.


20/24

This power was clearly used by the Vatican in the midst of World

War II through their agents of Jesuits, Knights, and Priesthood to

provide arms and curb dissent in Yugoslavia, Croatia, Austria, and

countless other regions. They were helping to get the Fascist

Catholic state in all of these regions. According to AvroManhatten in The Vatican Holocaust On April 7 the Yugoslav

Government left Belgrade for Montenegro. Two days later, on

April 9, Vladko Macek, its Vice-President, in his turn deserted it.

Macek was a Croat, a Catholic, and the leader of the Catholic

Croat Peasant Party. Yet this individual, while acting as the leader

of that Party, and, indeed, as Vice-President of the Yugoslav

Government, was simultaneously plotting with Fascist Italy forthe

disintegration of his country. As early as 1939 Macek had, in fact,

established contact with Mussolini, who had agreed to pay him 20

million diners to finance his bold Separatist plotthat is, to

destroy Yugoslavia in order to set up a Catholic Fascist State ofCroatia,(Manhatten 28). Avro Manhatten is himself a Knight of

Malta and His aristocratic roots meant that he was a Knight ofthe House of Savoy as well as a Knight Templar and a Knight ofthe Order of Mercedes (Manhatten 3). This making him privy to

knowledge that most other might not have.

In 1941 they would not only help others to kill in a racist fashion

by they themselves would spill the blood of thousands. In SerbiaThe Catholic Church did not leave the execution of a religious

war to the secular arm, as she had done in similar circumstancesin bygone centuries. She came down into the fighting field, full

tilt, shunning precautions and brandishing the sword against thosewhom she had decided to exterminate (Manhatten 65). Not only

does Manhatten describe the helping of the Nazis in his book he

also points out the completely racist elements of the Vatican itself.

He would also go on to describe the little know fact that the

ratlines set up for escaped Nazis were fully the doing of theVatican as well as some influence in the U.S. as is documented in


21/24

Project Paperclip. It only makes all too much sense that the

Vatican played a role, as their members have the immunity and

means by which to freely pass through countries, especially

during war time, via the Knights of Malta and theirhumanitarian works.

Avro Manhatten would also write a book entitled Vietnam: Why

did We Go adding further to the chaos and confusion that was

the Vietnam War he proclaims that it was also a Holy War that

was started by the Vatican. The President Diem was a zealous

Catholic who wanted to help with the extermination of none

Catholics in his own country to make another Fascist/Catholicstate. In one quite disturbing story he explains:

One day in early June, 1963, a 73 year old Buddhist monk namedThich Quang Duc stopped in a busy street in Saigon, the Capital

City of South Vietnam, and, after having been soaked with

gasoline by a fellow monk, sat down cross-legged; thereupon,

having calmly struck a match, he burned himself to death.

Prior to this, however, he had written a message to PresidentDiem: Enforce a policy of religious equality, the message read.

President Diem, a zealous Catholic, gave a prompt response. He

clamped martial law upon the city, sealed most of the pagodas,

ordered his secret police force to arrest Buddhist leaders, and

mobilized his troops to truncheon any Buddhist monk or any

Buddhist crowds who dared to protest at his increasingdiscrimination against their religion.(Manhatten 196). It seems

that it is an outright extermination policy towards those that wish

to have religious freedoms and do not fall in line with the Catholicway of thinking, attempting to draw the world back in to dark

ages of Monarchical rule through Vatican appeasement. During

this time the Vatican would also formulate a direct link to

Washington through John Foster Dulles When therefore, the

Vietnam problem came increasingly to the fore both the Vatican


22/24

and the U.S. focused their joint activities toward that country. The

chief formulators of the strategy were Secretary of State John

Foster Dulles in the diplomatic field, and Cardinal Spellman in the

ecclesiastical. The importance of the latter was paramount, since

Cardinal Spellman was the linchpin between Washington and theVatican.(Manhatten Vietnam 39).

The old ways have not gone away they have just become better athiding and convincing people they are without ill intent reminding

me of that old saying that the greatest deception ever pulled by the

devil was convincing people he doesnt exist. Well there is a devil

in the hearts and minds of people sick enough to follow suchludicrous ideologies.

In 2007 Pope Benedict XVI made a decree denouncing allchurches built after the reformation to be none apostolic churches

and in essence hold not status as a church. Quoted from theproverbial horses mouth himself:

Why do the texts of the Council and those of the Magisteriumsince the Council not use the title of Church with regard to those

Christian Communities born out of the Reformation of the

sixteenth century?

The response, which closes the decree, states,

According to Catholic doctrine, these Communities do not enjoy

apostolic succession in the sacrament of Orders, and are,

therefore, deprived of a constitutive element of the Church. Theseecclesial Communities which, specifically because of the absence

of the sacramental priesthood, have not preserved the genuine and

integral substance of the Eucharistic Mystery cannot, according toCatholic doctrine, be called Churches in the proper

sense.(Bennett 1).


23/24

Thats correct folks all of you out there who are in a church where

you worship at the altar of your choosing are officially not a

church in the eyes of the insane God man Pope Benedict XVI.

Some other notable figures within the Vaticans secret order ofdupes that have caused mayhem and infiltrated high level UnitedStates positions are the former head of the FBI, Louis Freeh,

was a member of Opus Dei. And so, we now understand the Wacoincident, where those White Protestants were killed; it was the

work of the Opus Dei. And we also have to remember that the

sharpshooter, one of them there, was a Japanese Roman Catholic,

Lon Horiuchi(Martin). Although there is conflicting reports onwhether Freeh was absolutely a member of Opus Dei there is no

conflict in the fact that he was a devote Roman Catholic as well as

the fact that he sent his kids to the According to The Bureau and

the Mole, a book byDavid A. Vise, Freehs son was enrolled at

the privateThe Heights SchoolinPotomac, Maryland, which Vise

describes as an Opus Dei academy(Wikipedia). Lon Horiuchi

also being a devote Catholic and the assassin who shot Vicki

Weaver and was one of the snipers who was shooting at theBranch Dravidians as they exited a burning building. This man

should have been executed for his role in these incidents but was

somehow dismissed

Also a list of the known Knights of Malta members:

Tony Blair William Randolph Hearst

Edward L. Hennessy, Jr. Rupert Murdoch(Baron) Conrad Hilton Ronald Reagan

Heinrich Himmler Oliver North

Richard Holbrooke Rick Santorum

J. Edgar Hoover David Rockefeller

Leonard G. Horowitz Nelson Rockefeller

Daniel Imperato

Lee Iococca

Carl Nicholas Karcher For full list see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_A._Visehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_A._Visehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_A._Visehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heights_School_%28Maryland%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heights_School_%28Maryland%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heights_School_%28Maryland%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potomac,_Marylandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potomac,_Marylandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potomac,_Marylandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potomac,_Marylandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heights_School_%28Maryland%29http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_A._Vise


24/24

Francis L. Kellogg

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/kmlst1.htm

Joseph Kennedy

(Senator) Ted KennedyHenry A. Kissinger

Bowie Kuhn

Michael Bloomberg

Pat Buchanan

James Buckley

William F. Buckley, Jr.

George H.W Bush

George W. Bush

Jeb Bush

Precott Bush, Jr.

Frank Capra

(King) Juan Carlos

Frank Charles Carlucci III

William CaseyMichael Chertoff

Gustavo Cisneros

(President) Bill Clinton

Bill Donovan

Allen Dulles

Avery Dulles

(Archbishop) Edward Egan
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/kmlst1.htmhttp://www.biblebelievers.org.au/kmlst1.htmhttp://www.biblebelievers.org.au/kmlst1.htm

Documents

Romanism and the Harlot Church