Role of structural engineers in face of natural disasters

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Role of structural engineers in face of natural disasters

    1/4

    HOW CAN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS

    DISASTER MITIGATION?

    Early 19th century London was a public health disaster; river Thames was literally an open sewer.

    Cholera epidemics - along with tuberculosis, typhoid, dysentery and smallpox -were the primary

    cause of death. They were thought of as everyday risks of living; until some wise men and a CivilEngineer by the name of Joseph Bazalgatte brought to an end that stream of thought. The life of the

    common man was brought to a new high as a consequence of this sanitary revolution. As those

    people thought then, it is now the time for us to stop being complacent about disasters and aim high;

    zero loss of life, minimum property damage from disasters. Yet again the role of engineers will be

    of paramount importance.

    Disaster Mitigation

    As hard as it is to predict a disaster, it is

    difficult to prevent disasters from happening.

    Although we are slowly unraveling the

    mysteries of nature, it never fails to surprise

    us; 1958 flooding of Zambezi during

    construction of Kariba dam, 2010

    Christchurch earthquake, 2013 Russian

    meteor shower. Each one of them surpassed

    the worst possible scenario, setup by means

    of human expertise, experience and

    expectation. There is no denying the

    possibility of our own township being hit by a

    disaster, better yet the worst kind.

    The United Nations is in the forefront in

    calling for the safety of human lives and

    property in the face of rapidly increasing odds

    for the world to be hit by a major disaster-

    breaking records ,among other things we'd

    rather see unshattered. According to

    them the aim is to achieve a

    significant reduction in the loss of life

    and material damage caused by

    disaster.

    Disaster Management Models

    There are several disaster

    management models which are

    helpful in responding to disasters. The

    traditional model represents a cyclic

    process where it shows a pre-disaster

    risk reduction phase and post-disaster

    recovery phase. A second model

    crunch/release model- identifies a disaster as

    the situation where a hazard meets

    vulnerability. Both these models areimportant in their own rightand are helpful

    in understanding the role of structural

    engineering in disaster mitigation.

    Role of a structural engineer scope under

    the traditional view

    We cannot restrict the role of a Structural

    Engineer to a section of disaster mitigation

    we can contribute across the full spectrum ofdisaster management. Structural Engineers

    have a role not only in designing disaster

    resistant structures, but also in rescue efforts

    in collapsed structures, immediate

    rehabilitation of infrastructure and

    reconstruction.

    F igure 1: Traditi onal Model of D isaster Management

  • 7/28/2019 Role of structural engineers in face of natural disasters

    2/4

    Pre-disaster risk reduction activities are where

    the contribution from structural engineers is

    significant. Work in this could be better

    guided by the crunch/release modelwhich

    will be explained in the due cause of the text.

    Role of the Structural Engineer in post-

    disaster recovery phase is as much important

    as any other professional role. Immediate

    rescue efforts after a disaster will include

    evacuation of people from unstable structures

    -after an earthquake, landslide, tsunami, - or

    accessing places with limited infrastructure

    after a flood, tsunami.

    Earthquakes and landslide produces unstable

    structures and soil conditions. Immediate

    rescue teams from military forces or fire

    rescue are under risk in accessing such places

    they put their lives in risk to rescue people

    they do not even know. A Structural

    Engineers input will be valuable in such

    cases to take precautionary measures and

    temporarily strengthen structures and

    underlying soilif required. This can reduce

    the risk on rescue personal and maybe even

    increase the chance of survival of the trapped

    people - by improving the safe access period

    to structures. To do this Structural Engineers

    should be trained to undertake quick visual

    assessment of a partially damaged structure

    and give an expert opinion.

    It is also possible that roads are damaged or

    flooded and the bridges have collapsed.

    Providing alternative temporary access is of

    utmost importance for rehabilitation after a

    disaster- although Sri Lanka was one of the

    hardest hit countries by 2004 Indian Ocean

    Tsunami it recovered quickly, thanks largely

    to the rapid bridge replacements and road

    clearance. Provision of rapid access allows for

    mobilization of medical and other basic

    requirements to people hit by the disaster.

    After the stages of immediate assistance the

    hype about the disaster dials down, but the

    lives have to continue. It is common - in

    many developing countries - to see people in

    relief camps, years after a disaster has struck.

    Importance of bringing back the city to life -

    as soon as practicable- can never be

    overstated.

    The reconstruction effort is threefold-

    essential infrastructure, public facilities,

    residencies. All these have to be completed

    simultaneously. Rehabilitation ofinfrastructure may require renovation or

    complete reconstruction. Structural Engineers

    will be required to assess the requirement and

    propose and carry out a structurally and

    economically viable solution.

    The residential structures pose a different

    challenge. Although the short term

    requirement is to bring the house up to a

    standard that allows resettlement, in long termthe house may be required to be further

    expanded- even to luxurious living standards.

    So the structural engineer will be required to

    look at the social aspects of the situation also.

    Rapidly deployable permanent housing units

    are a newly explored area. This would be a

    significant step towards rapid rehabilitation.

    F igur e 2: Road washed away during

    flooding, limi ting access to disaster h it areas.

  • 7/28/2019 Role of structural engineers in face of natural disasters

    3/4

    Role of a structural engineercrunch and

    release

    The crunch and release model describes a

    disaster as the situation where a fragile

    situationstructural, natural, social,

    economic or personal- meets a hazard

    earthquake, high wind, flood or drought. Thus

    the way to prevent a disaster is to release the

    pressure- from the hazard and fragility- on the

    element at riskphysical property, economy,

    or society. This model identifies the built

    environment as an element at risk. So it is in

    ourStructural Engineershand to come up

    with ways to reduce hazards and reduce

    fragility of built environment.

    Control of hazards is not an easy task at some

    situationsearthquakes, cyclones - but for

    some hazards it is a possibility -landslides,

    floodsand there are some hazards which

    can be avoided by appropriate land usage -

    tsunamis, floods. It is important to note that

    none of these mean complete elimination of

    hazards.

    The twobroader categories ofactivities

    Structural Engineers can get involved in to

    control hazards are,

    a. Research -to get a broaderunderstanding of the mechanism of

    hazards.

    b. Eliminate any activity that supportscreating a hazarde.g. improper land

    use will increase the possibility of a

    flood event.

    This second category should be looked intoas an integral part of designlike the

    emphasis on environmental performance and

    health and safety - but not as a separate line of

    work.

    Design of disaster resistant structuresas

    obvious to anyone- would be fully under the

    scope of Structural Engineering. Although

    there is an economical consideration when

    strengthening a structure to withstand adisaster force, there is no point in putting

    peoples life at riskat the current point in

    timewhen no one is certain of a place free

    from disasters. Disaster resistancein some

    peoples view- should be a compulsory

    design consideration.

    Further there is a certain portion of deaths

    occurring not due to disaster itself, but due to

    structures falling on. Along this line, research

    has been done to retrofit masonry structures

    in Middle Eastern countrieswhere

    earthquake dislodges heavy masonry blocks

    which are heavy enough to cause severe

    damage to people. They have proposed to use

    a Polypropylene net on either side of the

    block workcovered by a finishing mortar-

    to effectively hold the block work as a single

    integral unit. It is Structural Engineersresponsibility to even predict such cases and

    further reduce casualties.

    A lot of research work is being done in the

    area of vulnerability of structures due to

    natural disasters. Data collected from

    previous disaster situations provide data to

    create vulnerability curveswhich set the

    probability of a specified damage level (e.g.

    non- structural damage, complete collapse) tostructure at different values of a demand

    parameter related to the disaster in

    F igure 3: Crunch Model of Disaster M iti gation

  • 7/28/2019 Role of structural engineers in face of natural disasters

    4/4

    consideration (e.g. ground acceleration,

    tsunami wave height). These can be used to

    come up with collapse mechanisms for

    structures and design criterion and design

    codes for disaster resistant structures. This

    data are always insightful as disastersituations are always dynamic and it is very

    much difficult to distinguish what caused the

    collapse.

    Structural Engineerthe human being

    All those professional work of a structural

    engineer -at the face of disaster- is in addition

    to the social being he is. All of us have a

    social responsibilityand a capacity to act so

    to help out a person in need and not to put

    them in harms way. Our ability to be a part

    of a communityin essence- will push us to

    act in a way that will help out our fellow

    beings , be it professional work or -purely- an

    'in the moment' act.

    Figure 4: The Human Side in the Face of

    Disaster

    References:

    Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre. Disaster

    Risk Management & Mitigation. [online]

    Available fromwww.wyf.org.my/DRM.pdf

    [Accessed April 08 2013]

    Coburn A.W, Spence R.J.S, Pomonis A.

    Disaster Mitigation, 2nd ed.,

    Nelson Lam. 2011.Built Infrastructure in

    Extreme Events: Preparing Structural

    Engineers to Take on The Tasks of Disaster

    Mitigation. In Dissanayake R, Jayasinghe

    M.T.R, Mendis P.A, Fernando S.

    International Conference on Structural

    Engineering, Construction and Management

    2011. December 15 -17. Earls Regency Hotel,Kandy. p vii - xv

    Sathiparan N. 2012. SSESL Monthly

    Question Time.Retrofitting of Masonry

    Buildings under Seismic Loading. May 29.

    IESL Auditorium

    http://www.wyf.org.my/DRM.pdfhttp://www.wyf.org.my/DRM.pdfhttp://www.wyf.org.my/DRM.pdfhttp://www.wyf.org.my/DRM.pdf