Upload
allison-roberta-miles
View
224
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
• Role of fluoride on dental caries
• Role of fluoride on the prevalence of dental fluorosis
• The effect of fluoride on plaque bacteria
Objectives:
DENT 5302 TOPICS IN DENTAL BIOCHEMISTRY
4 April 2007
Outline
Overview of fluoride
Fluoride, dental caries, and fluorosis: Historical perspective
Structural-bound fluoride
Calcium fluoride-like material
Fluoride in saliva and dental plaque
How does fluoride work? (anticaries mechanisms)
Effect of fluoride on plaque bacteria
Potent inhibitor of many enzymes
Elimination by kidneys
Avid calcified tissue seeker
Inhibit and even reverse the formation of dental caries
Fluoride
Halogen group
The most electronegative element
13th most abundant in the crust of the earth
Found in virtually all inanimate and living things
F- + H+ HF Hydrofluoric acid (pKa ~ 3.4)
Fluorine:
Fluoride:
Fluoride: ionic form of fluorine
Remarkable decline in dental caries
Systemic and topical fluoride
F: The cornerstone of modern preventive dentistry
Dental fluorosis
Reversible gastric disturbances
Skeletal fluorosis
Death
when large doses are taken acutely
when lower doses are taken chronically
Fluoride is a hazardous substance
Water fluoridation
Top 10 great public health achievements
of the 20th century (CDC)
Regular consumption of drinking water with fluoride
Reduction of dental caries
Mottled enamelEndemic in several regions of the southwestern USA
McKay FS. The relation of mottled enamel to caries. J Am Dent Assoc 15:1429-1437, 1928.
“…these mottled enamel cases…are singularly
free from caries.”
Colorado Springs
? substance in drinking water ?
Mottled enamel = Dental fluorosis
Fluoride, Dental Caries, and Fluorosis
F
Dean HT et al., Domestic water and dental caries: V. Additional studies of the relation of fluoride domestic waters to dental caries experience in 4425 white children, aged 12-14 years, of 13 cities in 4 states.
Public Health Rep 57:1155-1179, 1942.
Water fluoride level ~ 1 ppm
Dean et al: various levels of fluoride in most water supplies
Caries prevention
Low prevalence of dental fluorosis
Dental FluorosisHypomineralization of enamel from excessive fluoride ingestion
during tooth development
Mild fluorosis (common) Severe fluorosis (rare)
Minor cosmetic defect Increased caries risk: Pitting & Loss outer enamel
Overintake of fluoride from 0-6 year old
Generally less in primary teeth (develop prenatally)
Most critical between 15-30 months of age: maxillary central incisors
Optimal water F level (~ 1 ppm)
20 % prevalence of very mild or mild fluorosis
Dentistry: Mild fluorosis is an acceptable tradeoff for
caries prevention
Esthetic: ‘mild’ cosmetic defect ?
Why are we concerned about dental fluorosis?
The prevalence of fluorosis has increased
No fluorosis: 27 % dissatisfied with their tooth color
Mild fluorosis: 50% dissatisfied
Water Fluoridation
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
Max. Contaminant Level (Primary Drinking Water Standards) = 4 ppm F
Naturally existed F in some municipal water & wells : 4-8 ppm F or higher
1945
Grand Rapids
Michigan
1948: Grand Rapids had 60% less DMFT than Muskegon ‘control’ city
Optimal level: 0.7 - 1.2 ppm F
Colder climates drink less water need higher fluoride level
USA: 67% (170 millions) on public water
system receive fluoridated water
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002
Halo effect
Persons not residing in fluoridated communities
Foods and beverages produced with fluoridated
water
The most cost-effective community-based approach for caries prevention
Direct annual cost of fluoridation: $ 0.68-3.0 per person per year
$1 invested in water fluoridation saves > $38 in treatment costs
Discussion: (group of 6-8)
1. The optimal level of fluoride in water as determined by this graph is 1 ppm.
What are the rationales?
2. Why in Minnesota the level of added fluoride in water varies from 0.7 to
1.2 ppm?
How does fluoride work?
Systemic incorporation into enamel during development
‘More perfect’ enamel crystals
Less acid soluble
Historical perspective
The more fluoride incorporated, the better cariostatic effect
Shark enamel (100% fluoroapatite) can develop caries lesion!
Øgaard B et al. Scand J Dent Res 96:209, 1988. Microradiographic study of demineralization of shark enamel in a human caries model.
Cariostatic effect of fluoride
The caries-reducing effect of fluoride is primarily achieved by its presence during
active caries development at the plaque/enamel interface where it directly alters
the dynamics of mineral dissolution and reprecipitation, and to some extent, affect
plaque bacteria.
Current philosophy
Change tooth morphology
Effect on plaque bacteria
Inhibit demineralization and enhance remineralization process
Goal: Try to maximize benefit with minimal adverse effects
MORE IS NOT NECESSARILY BETTER!
Controversial and not universally accepted
Debatable: need much higher concentration of fluoride to be effective
Cariostatic Mechanism of Fluoride
Effect of fluoride on plaque bacteria
1940: Fluoride inhibited carbohydrate metabolism in pure cultures of
streptococci and lactobacilli.
Bibby BG, van Kesteren M. The effect of fluoride on mouth bacterial.
J Dent Res 1940:19;391-402.
Fluoride affects oral bacteria and dental plaque ecology
IMPLY a reduced risk of caries
F inhibits bacterial adsorption
F reduces proportion of cariogenic bacteria in dental plaque
F decreases acid production
In vitro: 9500 ppm F in solution inhibit bacterial adsorption to hydroxyapatite
Clinical: rinses & toothpaste with Sn or amine F reduce plaque deposit
Clinical: only high concentration of fluoride works!
No difference in subjects from area upto 21 ppm F in water
Reduced MS in plaque after daily use of APF gel (12,300 ppm F)
Chemostat: 19 ppm F prevent MS from growing to a larger proportion
Fluoridated water or daily rinse with 0.2% (~900 ppm) NaF solution
Reduce 0.1 - 0.2 unit in pH drop after a sucrose challenge
No effect after 0.05 % (~200 ppm) rinse
Effect on dental plaque bacteriaEffect on dental plaque bacteria
Bound to enzymes
- Enolase
- Proton-extruding ATPase
Cytoplasmic acidification
H+ + F- HF
HF
HF forms when external pH is lower than pKa (3.4)
H+ + F-
Accumulation of H+
Accumulation of fluoride
Fluoride enters cell as HF (not F-)
Antimicrobial effect of FAntimicrobial effect of F
1122
‘Fluoride has inhibitory effects on plaque metabolism’
In vitro: 9500 ppm F in solution inhibit bacterial adsorption to hydroxyapatite
Reduced MS in plaque after daily use of APF gel (12,300 ppm F)
Fluoridated water or daily rinse with 0.2% (~900 ppm) NaF solution
reduced 0.1 - 0.2 unit in pH drop after a sucrose challenge
No effect in pH drop after 0.05 % (~200 ppm) NaF rinse
No reduction of MS in plaque in subjects from area upto 21 ppm F
in drinking water
How much fluoride is needed for antimicrobial effect?How much fluoride is needed for antimicrobial effect?
To what extent do these effects contribute to caries prevention?
Effective at a few ppm F
ppm F to reduce solubility << ppm F for antimicrobial effect
At pH 4-5
Fluoride in solution
reduces the amount of
enamel dissolved
The most important cariostatic mechanism of F: De- and Remineralization
How much fluoride is needed to reduce enamel solubility?How much fluoride is needed to reduce enamel solubility?
Lower dissolution rate
F- substitute OH-
Decrease crystal
dimension(F- is smaller)
Strong attraction with calcium(F: the most
electronegative)
Stabilize the lattice structure
Hydroxyapatite lattice structure
FOHCa
Improve the crystallinity
• F- fill vacancy• H-bond with O
H-bond
F
Fluoride in HAP crystal:Fluoride in HAP crystal:Structurally-bound FStructurally-bound F
‘Fluorhydroxyapatite’ ‘Fluoridated hydroxyapatite’ ‘Fluoroapatite-like material’
Range from 5-50 ppm wet weight
1% is available as fluoride ion
15-75% is ionizable
Some firmly-bound fluoride (bacterial uptake?)
Plaque matrix concentrate fluoride from saliva:
How much fluoride is in dental plaque?
+ve charges in matrix & on bacterial surface attract Ca2+
Ca2+ bind fluoride.
Calcium fluoride
Oral mucosa?
Plaque fluid F and Saliva F after 1-min rinse with
NaF ( 900 ppm) or MFP ( 1000 ppm)
Plaque fluid F
Saliva F
F decreases exponentially
Elevated for ~ 3 hours
Clinical study:
F level in saliva and
plaque remained for 18 h
F reservoir
Ekstrand J. Enhancing effects of fluoride. Cariology for the nineties, 409-420.
ten Cate JM, van Loveren C. Fluroide Mechanisms. Dent Clin N Am 1999;43:713-742.
Adapted from Sjögren T, Birkhed D. Caries Res 1993;27:474.
Age 26 + 8 24 + 8
Male / female 9 / 14 13 / 11
Salivary flow (ml/min) 1.5 + 0.3 1.5 + 0.5
MS (log CFU/ml saliva) 4.2 + 1 5.3 + 1
Lactobacilli (log CFU/ml saliva) 3.8 + 0.8 4.5 + 1.2
Brushing time (min) 2.8 + 1.6 2.6 + 2
Amount of toothpaste (g) 1.1 + 0.5 1.2 + 0.6
DMFT 4.8 + 5 * 18.9 + 7.3
Decay surface 0 * 3.8 + 3.1
Rinse frequency 1.5 + 0.7 * 3.6 + 1.9
Amount of water to rinse (ml) 70 + 60 * 190 + 10
F in saliva (immediate) (mM) 0.6 + 0.4 * 0.3 + 0.3
F in saliva (accumulate) (mM·min) 6.9 + 3.9 * 3.9 + 2.9
CharacteristicsLow
Caries-Active High
Caries-Active
Discussion: (group of 6-8) What characters affect caries development?
Discussion: (group of 6-
8)
I believe that the main anticaries effect of fluoride is by
changing the equilibrium towards remineralization,
not antimicrobial effect.
Why?
Recommended references
1. Ten Cate JM, van Loveren C. Fluoride Mechanisms. Dent Clin North Am
1999;43(4):713-742.
2. Featherstone JD. The science and practice of caries prevention. J Am Dent
Assoc 2000;131:887-899.
3. Gordon Nikiforuk. Understanding Dental Caries 1. Etiology and Mechanisms, Basic and Clinical Aspects. Basel; New York: Karger 1985. Chapters 4.
4. Gordon Nikiforuk. Understanding Dental Caries 2. Prevention, Basic and
Clinical Aspects. Basel; New York: Karger 1985. Chapters 3.
5. van Loveren C. Antimicrobial activity of fluoride and its in vivo importance:
Identification of research questions. Caries Res 2001;35(suppl 1):65-70.
6. Fejerskov O. Changing paradigms in concepts on dental caries:
Consequences for oral health care. Caries Res 2004;38:182-191.
7. Ten Cate JM. Review on fluoride, with special emphasis on calcium fluoride mechanisms in caries prevention. Eur J oral Sci 1997;105:461-465.