Upload
olga-marsh
View
20
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
0. Rockwood School District Review of Stanford 10 Test Data Fall 2004. February 17, 2005 Presented By: Bertha Doar, Ph.D. Coordinator of Assessment. 0. Ways to use this data:. Curricular strengths and areas needing improvement School Improvement process Staff Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Rockwood School DistrictReview of Stanford 10 Test Data
Fall 2004
February 17, 2005
Presented By:
Bertha Doar, Ph.D.
Coordinator of Assessment
Ways to use this data:
• Curricular strengths and areas needing improvement• School Improvement process• Staff Development• In the Fall, identify student’s strengths and areas
needing improvement and change instructional planning and grouping accordingly, before Spring MAP testing
INFORM DECISION MAKING regarding:
Challenges - First Year of Fall Testing & How they have been addressed
• Adjusting to the changes imposed - redistricting, fall testing, start of school, new enrollments– Next year – no redistricting, testing process will be more familiar
• Un-timed testing and a large part of the test in elementary is read to the students– Next year – the testing process will be more familiar, and we will re-
emphasize to staff the testing procedures
• Schools requested more than the usual number of teacher test directions– Additional teacher test directions have been purchased. We will also
ask schools and HR for teacher head counts and teacher directions requests prior to packing test materials for schools
Challenges - First Year of Fall Testing & How they have been addressed - continued
• Technical difficulties with the scanning machines reading the color printed test booklets resulted in the reports being scored in two different locations and thus there were delays in shipping back the score reports– The Scoring Company has purchased additional scanners
• Computer problems resulted in the reports being formatted incorrectly– The Scoring Company has worked out the score report printing problems
• Scoring the test booklets in two different locations because of the scanning problem led to problems and delays in the Online data analysis tool and receipt of the data for our data base– Harcourt has replaced the misprinted test booklets, and has worked out
the Online data report problem
Summary of Test Data
• The national average is set at the 50th percentile rank, and only 50% of the students are expected to score that high or better. In comparison, Rockwood students are performing at high levels in the content areas. Over 53% of the students at each grade level are performing above the national average. In some areas there are as many as 79% of the students performing above the national average.
• The minority groups of students not consistently performing as well are: VTS, African American, Free and Reduced lunch, and IEP program students.
• There are gender specific differences in performance, with females performing better in the reading and language arts areas for most grade levels. Males perform much better in math at grades two and three and slightly so at the other grades, while males perform better in science for most grade levels.
Rockwood School DistrictStanford 10 Fall 2004
Percent of students scoring above the 50th Percentile*
TOTAL N 1540 1539 1640 1661 1734 1742 1673
GRADE Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Total Reading 62% 63% 68% 70% 66% 71% 70%
Word Study Skills 56% 57% 53% 69% NA NA NA
Reading Vocabulary NA 66% 58% 68% 67% 68% 69%
Reading Comprehension 67% 62% 77% 73% 67% 70% 70%
Total Mathematics 73% 61% 69% 73% 67% 69% 68%
Math Problem Solving 67% 65% 68% 75% 69% 70% 71%
Math Procedures 73% 58% 67% 67% 66% 67% 65%
Language 62% 56% 74% 75% 69% 71% 69%
Spelling 63% 57% 71% 64% 66% 69% 64%
Science NA NA 79% 76% 68% 75% 74%
Environment 66% 66% NA NA NA NA NA
Social Science NA NA 74% 79% 74% 76% 75%
Listening 68% 54% 68% 72% 66% 71% 68%
Thinking Skills NA NA 74% 73% 73% 68% 74%
Basic Battery 71% 63% 72% 74% 69% 72% 71%
Complete Battery 72% 65% 74% 76% 70% 74% 73%
NA= Not applicable *This table represents key content areas, a complete listing may be found in the full report.
Rockwood School DistrictStanford 10 District Results- Fall 2004
Grade Level - National PercentilesTOTAL N 1540 1539 1640 1661 1734 1742 1673
GRADE Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Total Reading 59 58 62 67 62 68 65
Word Study Skills 58 58 51 64 NA NA NA
Reading Vocabulary NA 59 57 67 61 61 67
Reading Comprehension 63 58 72 69 61 70 64
Total Mathematics 69 58 64 70 66 66 69
Math Problem Solving 63 59 65 72 67 66 70
Math Procedures 72 55 64 66 63 63 63
Language 60 51 67 68 67 68 65
Editing NA NA 53 66 64 69 63
Spelling 59 59 67 64 62 66 64
Science NA NA 77 76 65 73 71
Environment 67 60 NA NA NA NA NA
Social Science NA NA 68 75 72 73 70
Listening 63 56 67 67 62 67 66
Thinking Skills NA NA 69 69 69 66 71
Basic Battery 61 57 64 67 64 66 66
Complete Battery 61 57 66 69 65 68 67
NA= Not applicable *This table represents key content areas, a complete listing may be found in the full report.
Rockwood School DistrictStanford 10 Fall 2004 Comparison Among SubtestsNational Percentile of the Mean Normal Curve Equivalent Scores (NCE)
Rockwood School DistrictStanford 10 National Percentile of the Mean Normal Curve Equivalent Scores
Subtest Composite Score Comparisons Fall 2004
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Nati
on
al
Perc
en
tile
Sc
ore
s
Total Reading Language Total Mathematics
Total Reading 59 58 62 67 62 68 65
Language 60 51 67 68 67 68 65
Total Mathematics 69 58 64 70 66 66 69
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
MSIP 3rd Cycle Standard 6.2.3
“The Board annually reviews performance data disaggregated based on race/ethnicity, gender, identified disability, migrant, and/or LEP students in order to effectively monitor student achievement and dropout/persistence-to-graduation rates.”
The appendix of the final report contains the District-level Disaggregation Data for the Fall 2004 Stanford 10 test.
Minority Group Comparisons
• Most minority groups of students score significantly below the majority students (7 NCEs or more). EXCEPT the Asian and LEP student groups.
• Asian students represent 3% of the tested population, they perform above the majority group.
• Limited English Proficient perform about 3 NCE points lower than the majority group
• Voluntary transfer students (VTS) are the lowest performing group, followed by the African American, Lunch program, and IEP students.
Stanford 10 2004 Minority vs. Majority Student Group Comparison Mean NCE scores for Total Reading
GRADE ALLNO IEP
IEP NOT LEP LEP NOT Lunch Lunch White Black Resident VTS
2 54.68 56.10 46.50 54.79 52.30 56.44 38.80 56.31 39.10 56.00 34.84
3 53.55 55.57 44.64 53.48 55.30 55.53 36.35 55.44 32.03 55.26 31.88
4 56.05 58.95 43.96 56.09 55.00 58.45 38.31 58.46 34.79 58.34 32.03
5 59.07 61.69 46.15 59.27 54.45 61.71 38.14 62.32 35.62 61.79 33.21
6 55.82 59.03 40.97 55.98 47.88 59.45 36.24 59.69 34.87 59.38 33.10
7 59.47 63.03 41.97 59.60 53.68 62.57 39.12 62.55 37.64 62.41 35.98
8 57.47 60.54 38.23 57.52 54.68 60.76 35.59 61.37 33.79 60.84 32.98
Minority Comparisons of Stanford 10 Total Reading Mean NCE Scores
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2 3 4 5 6 7 8Grade level
Mea
n N
CE
ALL IEP LEP Lunch Black VTS
Minority Comparisons of Stanford 10 Language Mean NCE Scores
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2 3 4 5 6 7 8Grade level
Mea
n N
CE
ALL IEP LEP Lunch Black VTS
Stanford 10 2004 Minority vs. Majority Student Group Comparison Mean NCE scores for Total Math
GRADE ALL NO IEP IEP NOT LEP LEP NOT Lunch Lunch White Black Resident VTS
2 60.64 62.29 51.18 60.72 59.05 62.40 44.79 62.38 43.80 61.98 40.63
3 54.26 55.92 46.93 54.13 57.61 56.17 37.67 56.03 32.42 55.99 32.42
4 57.38 59.94 46.70 57.21 61.74 59.82 39.28 59.66 35.89 59.68 33.26
5 60.87 63.24 49.22 61.00 58.07 63.22 42.29 63.70 39.74 63.27 38.17
6 58.54 62.00 42.51 58.57 57.05 62.32 38.09 62.38 36.63 62.13 35.56
7 58.79 62.22 41.97 58.76 60.29 61.62 40.27 61.42 38.29 61.50 37.23
8 59.79 63.07 39.28 59.71 64.11 63.06 38.08 63.28 36.34 63.17 35.22
Minority Comparisons of Stanford 10 Total Math Mean NCE Scores
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2 3 4 5 6 7 8Grade level
Mea
n N
CE
ALL IEP LEP Lunch Black VTS
Stanford 10 2004 Minority vs. Majority Student Group Comparison Mean NCE scores for Science
GRADE ALL NO IEP IEP NOT LEP LEP NOT Lunch Lunch White Black Resident VTS
4 65.11 67.2 56.4 65.14 64.55 67.48 47.59 67.81 42.54 67.47 40.41
5 64.60 66.15 57.00 64.87 58.55 67.04 45.31 67.72 42.85 67.13 40.59
6 58.09 60.76 45.72 58.25 50.14 61.79 38.06 62.09 36.50 61.67 35.17
7 62.67 65.73 47.69 62.79 57.62 65.68 42.95 65.91 40.13 65.69 38.63
8 61.38 64.21 43.65 61.45 57.43 64.72 39.20 65.61 35.82 65.07 34.52
Minority Comparisons of Stanford 10 ScienceMean NCE Scores
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4 5 6 7 8Grade level
Mea
n N
CE
ALL IEP LEP Lunch Black VTS
Stanford 10 2004 Minority vs. Majority Student Group Comparison Mean NCE scores for Social Science
GRADE ALL NO IEP IEP NOT LEP LEP NOT Lunch Lunch White Black Resident VTS
4 59.83 62.20 49.96 59.98 55.90 62.36 41.08 62.43 37.05 62.20 35.01
5 63.96 65.65 55.62 64.19 58.75 66.11 46.88 66.76 44.12 66.16 43.07
6 62.15 65.08 48.56 62.23 58.33 65.77 42.59 66.02 40.61 65.71 39.39
7 62.67 65.53 48.63 62.77 58.34 65.38 44.90 65.28 43.79 65.26 42.04
8 60.82 63.47 44.29 60.80 61.85 63.61 42.34 64.03 40.35 63.72 39.76
Minority Comparisons of Stanford 10 Social ScienceMean NCE Scores
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4 5 6 7 8Grade level
Mea
n N
CE
ALL IEP LEP Lunch Black VTS
Gender Differences
• Females outperform males at all grades for Reading and Language. Some differences are significant.
• To a lesser extent, females also outperform males in Listening and Thinking skills.
• Males tend to outperform females in Math and Science by 1 to 5 NCE score points.
Stanford 10 Fall 2004 Male vs. Female Group Comparisons of Total Reading Mean NCE Scores
Total ReadingGrade Females Males
2 56.49 53.08
3 55.15 52.18
4 57.60 54.79
5 60.64 57.75
6 57.53 54.06
7 60.88 57.94
8 58.95 56.05
Total Reading
50
55
60
65
70
75
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Grade
Mea
n N
CE Females Males
Stanford 10 Fall 2004 Male vs. Female GroupComparisons of Total Math Mean NCE Scores
Total MathGrade Females Males
2 58.96 62.24
3 51.66 56.99
4 57.27 58.02
5 60.54 61.29
6 58.92 58.14
7 58.50 59.02
8 60.45 59.18
Total Math
50
55
60
65
70
75
2 3 4 5 6 7 8Grade
Me
an N
CE Females Males
Stanford 10 Fall 2004 Male vs. Female GroupComparisons of Language Mean NCE Scores
LanguageGrade
Females Males
2 58.95 51.67
3 52.10 49.36
4 62.26 56.96
5 62.31 57.69
6 62.63 55.93
7 63.13 56.56
8 61.73 54.26
Language
50
55
60
65
70
75
2 3 4 5 6 7 8Grade
Mea
n N
CE
Females Males
Stanford 10 Fall 2004 Male vs. Female Group Comparisons of Science & Social Science Mean NCE Scores
ScienceGrade Females Males
4 64.12 66.36
5 62.69 66.46
6 56.78 59.43
7 60.92 64.40
8 60.27 62.5750
55
60
65
70
75
4 5 6 7 8
Females Males
Social ScienceGrade Females Males
4 59.36 60.32
5 64.35 63.70
6 62.35 61.95
7 62.84 62.43
8 60.61 61.1050
55
60
65
70
75
4 5 6 7 8
Females Males
Science
Social Science