Upload
einar
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10443–10445 10443
Cite this: Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10443–10445
Ring opening vs. direct bond scission of the chain in polymeric triazoles
under the influence of an external forcew
Hans S. Smalø and Einar Uggerud*
Received 12th April 2012, Accepted 29th August 2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cc34056a
Density functional theory calculations show that both ring
opening and chain dissociation of polymeric triazoles are facili-
tated by mechanical stretching of the molecules—the latter more
than the former. Experimentally observed ring opening upon
sonication can therefore not be explained by a mechanical
stretching mechanism alone.
1,2,3-Triazoles undergo ring opening mediated by ultrasound.1
The reaction is illustrated in Scheme 1 where R1 and R2 are
long alkyl chains (molecular weight is 96 kDa). The polymer
molecules were prepared in an acetonitrile solution and sub-
jected to ultrasound for 2 hours. Infrared spectroscopy of the
post-sonicated polymer solution was used to identify the two
products. In addition, gel permeation chromatography
showed that the average molecular weights of the product
polymers were half that of the reactant. Furthermore, heating
the solution in the absence of ultrasound showed no indication
of reaction. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that mecha-
nical stress induced by the ultrasound is the driving mechanism
behind this reaction, which was considered to be due to a
simple 1,3-dipolar cycloreversion of the otherwise robust 1,2,3-
triazole moiety.
Mechanochemistry is a general concept covering all aspects
of how the application of an external mechanical force may
influence chemical properties and reactivity.2–4 For example, it
has been demonstrated that a polymer molecule may be
anchored between the tip and the base of an atomic force
microscope (AFM), and then mechanically manipulated by
the motion of the cantilever to which the tip is attached. In this
manner, the molecule can be stretched, which may activate the
bonds and promote chemical reaction.5–8 In the extreme limit,
covalent bonds may break under the influence of a sufficiently
strong force alone.2
The application of ultrasound to reaction mixtures is a well
established technique for enhancing reaction rates and altering
product compositions.9 During sonication it is observed that
small bubbles form, grow, and collapse. The current under-
standing is that strong forces apply to the molecules when the
bubbles become unstable and burst, which in turn affects
reactivity.2,10 In addition to this powerful mechanochemical
component, the formation of transient hot spots in the
solution may also be of significance.9,11
The purpose of this communication is to examine the
influence of an external force on ring opening of polymers
containing a 1,2,3-triazole unit using quantum chemical method-
ology by calculating the energy profile of the reaction as a
function of the force. In addition, we are interested in investi-
gating how the mechanical strength of the C–C bonds of the
polymer chain varies with the external force and comparing
the critical energy of polymer scission of the two processes. In
this manner, we intend to get better insight into the factors
that govern ultrasound induced polymer dissociation. For our
model calculations we have applied hybrid density functional
theory in the common B3LYP implementation.12 This method
is known to provide rather accurate estimates of elementary
bond breaking processes up to the bond-breaking point,13,14
but it is also known that this approach becomes less reliable
beyond this point, i.e. for extended bond elongations, mainly
due to the neglect of static electron correlation.
All calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09
software package15 using the built-in methods B3LYP12 and
G4.16 We considered two model systems, R1 = R2 = CH3 and
R1 = R2 = C2H5 (Scheme 1). The energy profiles of the
reactions were first obtained in the absence of any external
force, and the key data are reproduced in Table S1 (ESIw). Thepresence of a transition state was confirmed by identifying one
imaginary frequency (see Table S3, ESIw) and by performing
intrinsic reaction calculations starting from the found transi-
tion state. The computed high energy of reaction and critical
energy (barrier height), being 272 and 337 kJ mol�1, respec-
tively, are in good accord with the fact that 1,2,3-triazoles
possess strong intrinsic resistance towards ring opening, and
that they are conveniently formed in the laboratory by the
reverse reaction—addition of alkynes to azides.
Table S1 (ESIw) also confirms that B3LYP with the basis set
6-31++G(d,p) offers a good compromise between moderate
computational effort and high accuracy in describing the energy
Scheme 1 Ring opening of a 1,2,3-triazole.
Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033,N-0315 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Backgroundtheory and additional figures. See DOI: 10.1039/c2cc34056a
ChemComm Dynamic Article Links
www.rsc.org/chemcomm COMMUNICATION
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 16
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
03
Sept
embe
r 20
12 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C2C
C34
056A
View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
10444 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10443–10445 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
profile of the reaction, since the values obtained using this method
are similar to those obtained with the composite G4 method. The
latter is known to provide relative energies and critical energies of
so-called chemical accuracy, which is �10 kJ mol�1.17
From Table S2 (ESIw) it is seen that the critical energies for
ring opening of dimethyl- and diethyl-1,2,3-triazoles are essen-
tially the same. If this trend can be extrapolated to molecules
with longer alkane chains, this finding indicates that the
barrier height for ring opening of the polymers investigated
by Brantley et al.1 is probably not very different from the
model molecules studied here, at least not in the purified
gaseous state. However, since the sonication experiments were
conducted on molecules in solution and not on isolated
molecules, it is important to evaluate the role of the medium.
Ignoring the detailed molecular interactions, it is possible to
estimate the average electrostatic interaction using a polariz-
able continuum model (PCM)18 using PCM-B3LYP with the
same basis set. By applying the value er = 35.7 for the
dielectric constant of acetonitrile we obtain a critical energy
which is 26 kJ mol�1 higher than the in vacuo value, Table S2
(ESIw). In other words, it appears that the solvent has no
stabilizing effect on the transition state.
To simulate the effects of an external force, constrained
geometry optimizations were then performed using the
COGEF (COnstrained Geometries simulate External Force)
approach.14 In a COGEF optimization two anchor nuclei are
identified, one at each end of the molecule, and the distance l
between the two is increased gradually in a step-by-step
fashion. For each step the energy is fully minimized by varying
all degrees of freedom except l. In consequence, the net force
on all nuclei along a COGEF path is zero except for the two
anchor nuclei. For the two cases investigated here—the
dimethyl substituted (Fig. S2, ESIw) and the diethyl substituted
(Fig. S3, ESIw) triazoles—the carbons labeled C3 and C4, and
C5 and C6, respectively, were chosen to be the anchor nuclei.
The procedure was repeated for both the transition state and
the initial state geometries. The resulting force modified
potential energy curves are reproduced in Fig. S4 and S5 (ESIw).The most important parameter in controlling the reaction rate
is the critical energy E which is defined as
Ez(F) = ETS(F) � EIS(F) (1)
where ETS is the force modified potential energy (see theory in
ESIw) of the transition state and EIS of the initial state. Using
the available data we obtain the force modified variation of the
critical energy Ez(F), Fig. 1. It is evident from this plot that the
critical energy decreases with increasing applied force for both
reactions, showing that the critical energy for the ring opening
is reduced by applying a stronger force. The plot also shows
rather minor differences between the two analogue molecules
in this respect.
It is well known that the C–C bonds of polymer chains are
vulnerable to mechanical stress and demonstrate characteristic
lowering of the critical energy for dissociation with increasing
force.13,14 In the present context it therefore became pertinent
to investigate this alternative to ring opening. This reaction
type was modelled using the same methodology and the same
model systems, Schemes 2 and 3. For R1 = R2 = CH3 it turns
out that the mechanically weakest bond is the bond between
the substituent and the ring, while for R1 = R2 = C2H5 it is
the C–C bond next to the ring (a-cleavage). It seems reason-
able to consider the generally favourable a-cleavage observed
for the diethyl analogue also to be typical for the situation in
longer polymer chains, and that this non-polar reaction is not
much affected by the solvent. In the absence of any external
force the critical energies computed for breaking the respective
C–C bonds are above 400 kJ mol�1, which are higher than
for ring opening. However, as evident from Fig. 2 the critical
Fig. 1 Critical energy for ring opening (Scheme 1) as a function of
the applied force for R1 = R2 = CH3 (�) and R1 = R2 = C2H5 (J).
Scheme 2 C–C bond cleavage in dimethyl-1,2,3-triazole.
Scheme 3 C–C bond cleavage in diethyl-1,2,3-triazole.
Fig. 2 Critical energy as a function of external applied force, for ring
opening (Scheme 1, J) and C–C bond scission (Scheme 3, }) for
R1 = R2 = C2H5.
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 16
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
03
Sept
embe
r 20
12 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C2C
C34
056A
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10443–10445 10445
energy—calculated using eqn (1) with elongation beyond the
bond critical point treated as the transition state—falls off
more quickly with increasing force. It is important to note that
under a constrained geometry optimization it is l not F that is
allowed to vary, so we do not control the external force
directly during calculation. As a result, immediately after the
bond critical point for 1,4-diethyl-1,2,3-triazole is reached, the
geometry optimization converged to a situation where one
bond is broken and all other bonds relax. Thus, we do not
obtain data for the critical energy for reaction (3) beyond
2.1 nN.
As an alternative, a constrained geometry optimization was
also performed by pulling the atoms labelled N3 and C2 in
Fig. S2 (ESIw), resulting in the ring opening illustrated in
Scheme 1. However, the critical force needed to break the ring
is 13.5 nN, which is significantly higher than the force required
to break a general C–C bond in a polymer.
At this stage of the discussion it seems clear that for
F o 1.0 nN—below the crossing point of the two curves of
Fig. 2—ring opening is preferred, while for F > 1.0 nN, the
a-bond is more likely to break. This is a key point, since
Brantley et al. interpreted the observed ring opening to be due
to a directed mechanical force induced by the stress resulting
from cavitation. At the crossing point, the critical energy is
320 kJ mol�1, which is substantial.
The fact that ring opening is preferred therefore suggests
that a mechanical force alone cannot fully explain the effect of
ultrasound. On the other hand, the experimental results
provided by Brantley et al. clearly indicate that mechanical
force is essential. We cannot rule out nonadiabatic effects
including rapid heating during bubble collapse, the involve-
ment of excited electronic states, as well as relevant mecha-
nistic alternatives. The latter could include solvent molecule
assisted ring opening as well as radical initiated processes—
both processes that may be aided by mechanical force.
In conclusion it should also be mentioned that after sub-
mission of the present manuscript, Brantley et al. published a
paper discussing other aspects of the mechanism than those
discussed here.19
References
1 J. N. Brantley, K. M. Wiggins and C. W. Bielawski, Science, 2011,333, 1606–1609.
2 M. K. Beyer and H. Clausen-Schaumann, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105,2921–2947.
3 Z. S. Kean and S. L. Craig, Polymer, 2012, 53, 1035–1048.4 C. R. Hickenboth, J. S. Moore, S. R. White, N. R. Sottos,J. Baudry and S. R. Wilson, Nature, 2007, 44, 423–427.
5 S. R. K. Aniavarapu, A. P. Witta, L. Dougan, E. Uggerud andJ. M. Fernandez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6479–6487.
6 T. J. Kucharski and R. Boulatov, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21,8237–8255.
7 J. Ribas-Arino, M. Shiga and D. Marx, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,2009, 48, 4190–4193.
8 G. Bell, Science, 1978, 200, 618–627.9 T. J. Mason, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1997, 26, 443–451.10 V. V. Boldyrev, Ultrason. Sonochem., 1995, 2, 143–145.11 J. L. Luche, Ultrasonics, 1992, 30, 156–162.12 A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys, 1993, 98, 5648–5652.13 M. F. Iozzi, T. Helgaker and E. Uggerud, Mol. Phys., 2009, 107,
2537–2546.14 M. K. Beyer, J. Chem. Phys., 2000, 112, 7307–7312.15 M. J. Frisch, et al., Gaussian 09 Revision A.1, Gaussian Inc.,
Wallingford, CT, 2009.16 L. A. Curtiss, P. C. Redfern and K. Raghavachari, J. Chem. Phys.,
2007, 084108.17 L. A. Curtiss, P. C. Redfern and K. Raghavachari, Chem. Phys.
Lett., 2010, 499, 168–172.18 M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega and V. Barone, J. Chem.
Phys., 2002, 117, 43–54.19 J. N. Brantley, S. Sriharsa, M. Konda, D. E. Makarov and
C. W. Bielawski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 9882–9885.
Dow
nloa
ded
by G
eorg
e M
ason
Uni
vers
ity o
n 16
Mar
ch 2
013
Publ
ishe
d on
03
Sept
embe
r 20
12 o
n ht
tp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C2C
C34
056A
View Article Online