Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
10/3/2017
1
Learning to Use RIMS II Multipliers
The RIMS II Data and System of Analysis
1Dave Swenson
RIMS II
• Regional Impact Modeling System • This has been developed as a for‐a‐fee data service by
the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis – BEA• BEA is the primary agency of the federal government
that compiles economic information.• For our purposes, they also produce what are called
the Benchmark Input‐Output accounts of the U.S. Economy.
• We depend on those data to build our input‐output models
• And students will recognize the structure of the national I‐O table as identical to their own work
2Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
2
Total Requirements Table From the BEA
3Dave Swenson
When you buy RIMS II data from the BEA, here’s what you get ….
• A regionally or state specific set of total final demand multipliers for– Total industrial output
– Value added
– Earnings (labor income = wages and salaries, proprietors’ income, plus employer contributions to insurance, pensions, and social insurance)
– Jobs
• Rather than generating our own multipliers, we simply apply theirs
4Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
3
Example of Total Multipliers from RIMS II
This, too, contains the same type of information I’ve already showed you: Looking at Forestry and Logging (113300), for example, if the Iowa economy had $1 change in that sector’s final demand ….
– $1.7651 in total output change,– $.6041 in earnings change,– $.9889 in value added change, and – Each $million change in forestry & logging final demand required 21.94 total Iowa jobs
5Dave Swenson
State of Iowa
Industry Code
Industry Final-demand Output /1/
(dollars)
Final-demand
Earnings /2/ (dollars)
Final-demand Value-added /4/
(dollars)
Final-demand Employment
/3/ (number of jobs)
1111C0 Oilseed and grain farming 2.2912 0.5115 0.8164 11.7168111200 Vegetable and melon farming 1.658 0.4625 1.0362 12.1034111300 Fruit and tree nut farming 1.7646 0.5603 1.1035 15.8131111400 Greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture production 1.8601 0.6512 1.0677 14.6713111900 Other crop farming 1.8274 0.5141 0.9785 11.27271121A0 Beef cattle ranching and farming, including feedlots and dual-purpose ranching and farmin 2.3601 0.4762 0.9277 10.0601112120 Dairy cattle and milk production 2.2588 0.5108 0.9481 11.229112A00 Animal production, except cattle and poultry and eggs 1.7215 0.392 1.0553 7.9912112300 Poultry and egg production 2.8222 0.5981 0.9759 12.3488113000 Forestry and logging 1.7651 0.6041 0.9889 21.9356
Total Change Per Million $ of Output Change
Table of Multipliers from 326190 Other plastics product manufacturing
6Dave Swenson
State of Iowa
Industry Code
Industry Final-demand Output /1/
(dollars)
Final-demand
Earnings /2/ (dollars)
Final-demand Value-added /4/
(dollars)
Final-demand Employment
/3/ (number of jobs)
326160 Plastics bottle manufacturing 1.9851 0.3655 0.7341 8.4095326190 Other plastics product manufacturing 2.044 0.3986 0.7491 9.7769
Total Change Per Million $ of Output Change
State of Iowa
Industry Code
IndustryOutput Earnings Jobs
326160 Plastics bottle manufacturing 1.0 0.143182 3.37326190 Other plastics product manufacturing 1.0 0.150200 3.84
Direct Change Per $Million of Output Change
State of IowaType II
Earnings Multiplier
Type II Jobs Multiplier
Industry Code
Industry Direct-effect Earnings /5/
(dollars)
Direct-effect Employment /6/
(number of jobs)
326160 Plastics bottle manufacturing 2.5527 2.4991326190 Other plastics product manufacturing 2.6538 2.5436
10/3/2017
4
You also get
• Aggregated industrial contributions to the total final demand multipliers for– Total industrial output– Value added– Earnings (labor income)– Jobs
In the next table, the values are to be read left to right, but they are the same aggregated industry multipliers that were in your Total Requirements Table for your assignment
7Dave Swenson
8Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
5
Using the Multipliers
Say we had a new plastics manufacturer wanting to locate in Iowa. In its application for economic development assistance it told the state that it would employ 45 workers, pay out a total of $1.96 million in labor incomes (Earnings), and have total output of $8.68 million, all producing for final demand (i.e., export sales).
We could easily build a table that lets us apply our multipliers from a table of RIMS II multipliers and arrives at the expected impacts
9Dave Swenson
Refer to the Iowa multipliers handout
10Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
6
Table of Multipliers from 326190 Other plastics product manufacturing
11Dave Swenson
State of Iowa
Industry Code
Industry Final-demand Output /1/
(dollars)
Final-demand
Earnings /2/ (dollars)
Final-demand Value-added /4/
(dollars)
Final-demand Employment
/3/ (number of jobs)
326160 Plastics bottle manufacturing 1.9851 0.3655 0.7341 8.4095326190 Other plastics product manufacturing 2.044 0.3986 0.7491 9.7769
Total Change Per Million $ of Output Change
State of Iowa
Industry Code
IndustryOutput Earnings Jobs
326160 Plastics bottle manufacturing 1.0 0.143182 3.37326190 Other plastics product manufacturing 1.0 0.150200 3.84
Direct Change Per $Million of Output Change
State of IowaType II
Earnings Multiplier
Type II Jobs Multiplier
Industry Code
Industry Direct-effect Earnings /5/
(dollars)
Direct-effect Employment /6/
(number of jobs)
326160 Plastics bottle manufacturing 2.5527 2.4991326190 Other plastics product manufacturing 2.6538 2.5436
So, we could calculate the impacts as …
Direct Values X Multiplier = Impact
Output = $8.68 M X 2.044 = $17.74 M
Earnings = $1.96 M X 2.6538 = $ 5.20 M
Jobs = 45 X 2.5436 = 114.462 jobs
12Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
7
If all they had told us was that their expected annual output was $8.68 million we could have done it this way ….
Total output of $8.68 million X
Total output multiplier of 2.044 = $17.74 million
Total earnings multiplier of .3986 = $3.46 millionAnd
Total jobs multiplier of 9.7769 (per $million of output = 8.68 X 9.7769 = 84.8 jobs
The earnings and jobs values are different from the previous estimate, so the more information you get, the better your impact estimate as the industry in the first example indicated that it was somewhat different than the state average for that kind of manufacturing
13Dave Swenson
New scenario
Now suppose that a new cookie factory was going to open but the only thing that it would tell you was that it would employ 100 workers.
What kinds of impacts could you calculate?
We begin, again with a table of multipliers for the cookie industry
14Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
8
Table of Multipliers from 311820 Cookie, cracker, and pasta manufacturing
15Dave Swenson
State of Iowa
Industry Code
Industry Final-demand Output /1/
(dollars)
Final-demand
Earnings /2/ (dollars)
Final-demand Value-added /4/
(dollars)
Final-demand Employment
/3/ (number of jobs)
311810 Bread and bakery product manufacturing 2.1092 0.474 0.8634 14.16013118A0 Cookie, cracker, pasta, and tortilla manufacturing 2.1699 0.4236 0.8496 10.3696
Total Change Per Million $ of Output Change
State of Iowa
Industry Code
IndustryOutput Earnings Jobs
311810 Bread and bakery product manufacturing 1.0 0.195981 7.273118A0 Cookie, cracker, pasta, and tortilla manufacturing 1.0 0.143161 3.64
Direct Change Per $Million of Output Change
State of IowaType II
Earnings Multiplier
Type II Jobs Multiplier
Industry Code
Industry Direct-effect Earnings /5/
(dollars)
Direct-effect Employment /6/
(number of jobs)
311810 Bread and bakery product manufacturing 2.4186 1.94843118A0 Cookie, cracker, pasta, and tortilla manufacturing 2.9589 2.8487
Interpolating the impacts: finding the direct values
Steps:
1. The table tells us that there are 3.64 jobs per $1 million in direct cookie industry output. So,
100 jobs / 3.64 = $27.47 million in expected direct output.
2. The table tells us that we would expect, per $1 million in direct output, $.143161 million in direct labor income (earnings).
$27.47 in output X .143161 = $3.93 million in direct labor income (or earnings)
3. And there are 100 direct jobs, so …
16Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
9
Impacts continued
Now we can do the direct values times the multipliers now just like the first example using the numbers we knew and the numbers we discovered
Output = $27.47 M X 2.1699 = $59.61 M
Labor Inc. = $3.93 M X 2.9589 = $11.63 M
Jobs = 100 X 2.8487 = 284.9 jobs
17Dave Swenson
I could have just used the change in output times just the final demand multipliers
• Output = $27.47 M X 2.1699 = $59.61 M• Earnings = $27.47 M X .4236 = $11.64 M• Jobs =$27.47 M X 10.3696 = 284.9 jobs
I chose to “back‐out” the direct values first so that we could evaluate the initial worth of the jobs.
18Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
10
Comparisons
The cookie Type II multipliers are higher than the plastic multipliers. Why is that? What is going on in the Iowa accounts that would make cookies worth more to an economy than plastics?
Why do we need to be careful when we are declaring our economic impacts, and most especially when we are looking at food processing industries?
19Dave Swenson
Calculating the industrial distribution of the final demand change
• Now you would go to the spreadsheet if you were actually doing this, but I have a short summary of just a few of those multipliers on the last page of your multipliers table
• Attached are the transposed values (for display purposes) of the values in the final demand tables for vegetable and melon production, sector 111200
20Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
11
21Dave Swenson
Vegetable and melon farming Output
Vegetable and melon farming
Earnings
Vegetable and melon farming
Value Added
Vegetable and melon farming Jobs
(Per $ Million of Final Demand
Change)
1 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting 1.0757 0.3013 0.7152 7.6555
2 Mining 0.0046 0.0007 0.0028 0.0177
3 Utilities* 0.0234 0.0034 0.0131 0.0385
4 Construction 0.0139 0.0045 0.0078 0.093
5 Durable goods manufacturing 0.0307 0.0061 0.0107 0.1537
6 Nondurable goods manufacturing 0.0996 0.0152 0.0333 0.2597
7 Wholesale trade 0.0647 0.02 0.0439 0.3272
8 Retail trade 0.0466 0.0163 0.0311 0.6618
9 Transportation and warehousing* 0.0297 0.0095 0.0152 0.2246
10 Information 0.015 0.0032 0.0085 0.0645
11 Finance and insurance 0.066 0.0166 0.0363 0.3005
12 Real estate and rental and leasing 0.0465 0.0075 0.0326 0.4282
13 Professional, scientific, and technical services 0.0151 0.0069 0.0102 0.1405
14 Management of companies and enterprises 0.0071 0.0024 0.0043 0.0318
15 Administrative and waste management services 0.0131 0.0052 0.0083 0.2199
16 Educational services 0.008 0.0037 0.0049 0.1527
17 Health care and social assistance 0.0552 0.0245 0.033 0.5963
18 Arts, entertainment, and recreation 0.0036 0.0009 0.002 0.0504
19 Accommodation 0.0056 0.0015 0.0035 0.0693
20 Food services and drinking places 0.0144 0.0046 0.0076 0.2962
21 Other services* 0.0195 0.008 0.0111 0.2669
0.0006 0.0006 0.0546
Total Final Demand Multipliers 1.658 0.4626 1.036 12.1035
Let’s apply these multipliers
• Many think local foods is good way to boost a local economy.
• My very good research tells me that it each acre of Iowa fresh fruit or vegetable and melon production operated efficiently produces about $3,800 in gross sales at the wholesale level. Someone farming 25 acres would be expected to have 25 X $3,800 = $95,000 in total annual sales (at the farm gate).
– Can this person make a go of it as only a farmer?
– Is this level of production meaningful for my regional economy?
• Let’s assume this is all net new productivity to the state and run it through the model. We would multiply $95,000 times every value in the previous table and sum the values to get the totals.
22Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
12
23Dave Swenson
$95,000 in direct final demand change in fruits and vegetables would produce these total and itemized economic impacts in Iowa
Vegetable and melon farming
Output
Vegetable and melon farming
Earnings
Vegetable and melon farming
Value Added
Vegetable and melon farming Jobs (Per $
Million of Final Demand Change)
1 Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting $ 102,192 $ 28,624 $ 67,944 0.727
2 Mining $ 437 $ 67 $ 266 0.002
3 Utilities* $ 2,223 $ 323 $ 1,245 0.004
4 Construction $ 1,321 $ 428 $ 741 0.009
5 Durable goods manufacturing $ 2,917 $ 580 $ 1,017 0.015
6 Nondurable goods manufacturing $ 9,462 $ 1,444 $ 3,164 0.025
7 Wholesale trade $ 6,147 $ 1,900 $ 4,171 0.031
8 Retail trade $ 4,427 $ 1,549 $ 2,955 0.063
9 Transportation and warehousing* $ 2,822 $ 903 $ 1,444 0.021
10 Information $ 1,425 $ 304 $ 808 0.006
11 Finance and insurance $ 6,270 $ 1,577 $ 3,449 0.029
12 Real estate and rental and leasing $ 4,418 $ 713 $ 3,097 0.041
13 Professional, scientific, and technical services $ 1,435 $ 656 $ 969 0.013
14 Management of companies and enterprises $ 675 $ 228 $ 409 0.003
15 Administrative and waste management services $ 1,245 $ 494 $ 789 0.021
16 Educational services $ 760 $ 352 $ 466 0.015
17 Health care and social assistance $ 5,244 $ 2,328 $ 3,135 0.057
18 Arts, entertainment, and recreation $ 342 $ 86 $ 190 0.005
19 Accommodation $ 532 $ 143 $ 333 0.007
20 Food services and drinking places $ 1,368 $ 437 $ 722 0.028
21 Other services* $ 1,853 $ 760 $ 1,055 0.025
$ - $ 57 $ 57 0.005
Total Economic Impacts $ 157,510 $ 43,947 $ 98,420 1.150
The impacts …
We can see that – most of the job and labor income amounts are in the vegetable and
melon sector. 25 acres of production would support 73/100ths of a job and $28,224 in labor income to the farmer and all of her help.
– There are also more manufacturing, finance, and real estate costs than in the other categories.
– In all, this level of productivity in Iowa would support just over 1.15 jobs and $44,947 in total labor income in the state.
It is safe to assume that our vegetable farmer is going to need another job.
Oh, by the way, my very good research tells me that 25 acres produces a large fraction (from 25 to 50 percent depending on the product) of the seasonal fresh fruits and vegetable needs of just under 5,000 persons in Iowa
24Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
13
Learning to Use RIMS II Multipliers: Part 2
The RIMS II Data and System of Analysis
25Dave Swenson
A bill of goods approach
First, read the REGIONAL MULTIPLIERS:A User Handbook for the Regional Input‐Output Modeling System (RIMS II) ‐‐
We have already used a multipliers approach to an economic impact. Now we are going to shift away from the multipliers to another approach.
26Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
14
Using industry inputs
Sometimes we do not know much about an industry or the industry is not well described in our modeling system.
To compensate, we can look at the balance sheet of an industry to identify its major inputs into production, as well as the estimated percent of those inputs that are purchased locally.
We would also look at its payments to labor.
27Dave Swenson
Where would we get this kind of information????
• For new or cutting edge industrial activity, we might have to go to universities to look at the technical feasibility analyses that, say, engineers have conducted on scaling up a new technology– Biofuels
– Solar energy
– Electric car manufacturing
– Bioengineering
28Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
15
For a new industrial prospect,
We might just ask them point blank ….
1. How many of the major production inputs do you plan on buying from the local economy?
2. What are those inputs and what do you expect to spend?
3. How many workers will be involved with this project?
4. What will you pay those workers?
29Dave Swenson
Bill of Goods Analysis
• This gives us the opportunity to conduct a “Bill of Goods” or “Analysis of Inputs” method for estimating impacts
• It is a little more complicated but it is very useful, especially, again, when there is limited information about an industry or the industry is a new type or of a type that does not resemble existing industries in your model
• It is somewhat more crude than traditional I‐O analysis in that it does not depend on extremely itemized estimates of industrial inputs over the entire life of the industry
30Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
16
Needs
• We need a multiplier table – you already have the Iowa table of total multipliers – that is what we will use
• We also need to translate household spending into total output, total earnings, and total jobs. That multiplier is contained in the last line of the multiplier table.
31Dave Swenson
Multiplier Table
We really only need the Total Requirements Table – the first four numerical columns of your handout to do this assessment
32Dave Swenson
10/3/2017
17
Let’s pretend that …
• There’s a furniture manufacturer start up who doesn’t quite know what her expected output would be, but thinks it would be about $1.2 million.
• And let’s assume that there were just a few major requirements for this manufacturer and that she estimated the fraction coming from each.
33Dave Swenson
First we calculate the input (indirect requirement) values
34Dave Swenson
Furniture Economic Impact for $1,200,000 in Annual Output
Industry Code
Inputs Percent of Inputs Input Amounts
321100 Sawmills and wood preservation 20% 240,000
420000 Wholesale trade 10% 120,000
326190 Other plastics product manufacturing 5% 60,000
484000 Truck transportation 8% 96,000
H00000 Labor (Households) 30% 360,000
Imports 27% 324,000
10/3/2017
18
Dave Swenson 35
Next input amounts for each sector are translated into total impacts for those sectors using multipliers
from the total multipliers tables
36Dave Swenson
State of Iowa Total Change Per Million $ of Output Change
Industry Code
IndustryFinal-demand
Output /1/ (dollars)
Final-demand Earnings /2/
(dollars)
Final-demand Value-added /4/
(dollars)
Final-demand Employment /3/
(number of jobs)
321100 Sawmills and wood preservation 1.6501 0.3341 0.5877 9.3747
326190 Other plastics product manufacturing 2.044 0.3986 0.7491 9.7769
420000 Wholesale trade 1.6662 0.5105 1.0639 10.845
484000 Truck transportation 1.816 0.5376 0.903 13.4048
H00000 Households 0.9681 0.2919 0.5584 9.1978
10/3/2017
19
For the total output impacts we multiply the input amount for each industry times its output multiplier
37Dave Swenson
Furniture Economic Impact for $1,200,000 in Annual Output
Industry Code
Inputs Percent of InputsInput Amounts Output
321100 Sawmills and wood preservation 20% 240,000 396,024
420000 Wholesale trade 10% 120,000 199,944
326190Other plastics product manufacturing 5% 60,000 122,640
484000 Truck transportation 8% 96,000 174,336
H00000 Labor (Households) 30% 360,000 348,516
Imports 27% 324,000 NA
And so on for the labor income and the job impacts
38Dave Swenson
Furniture Economic Impact for $1,200,000 in Annual Output
Industry Code
Inputs Percent of Inputs
Input Amounts Output Labor Income Jobs
321100Sawmills and wood preservation 20% 240,000 396,024 80,184 2.25
420000 Wholesale trade 10% 120,000 199,944 61,260 1.30
326190Other plastics product manufacturing 5% 60,000 122,640 23,916 0.59
484000 Truck transportation 8% 96,000 174,336 51,610 1.29
H00000 Labor (Households) 30% 360,000 348,516 105,084 3.31
Imports 27% 324,000 NA NA NA
10/3/2017
20
Now we can sum all of the indirect & induced impacts
39Dave Swenson
Furniture Economic Impact for $1,200,000 in Annual Output
Industry Code
Inputs Percent of Inputs
Input Amounts Output Labor Income Jobs
321100Sawmills and wood preservation 20% 240,000 396,024 80,184 2.25
420000 Wholesale trade 10% 120,000 199,944 61,260 1.30
326190Other plastics product manufacturing 5% 60,000 122,640 23,916 0.59
484000 Truck transportation 8% 96,000 174,336 51,610 1.29
H00000 Labor (Households) 30% 360,000 348,516 105,084 3.31
Imports 27% 324,000 NA NA NA
Indirect and Induced Values $ 1,241,460 $ 322,054 8.74
Last we determine the direct impacts and sum the results to get the total impacts
40Dave Swenson
Furniture Economic Impact for $1,200,000 in Annual Output
Industry Code
Inputs Percent of Inputs
Input Amounts Output Labor Income Jobs
321100Sawmills and wood preservation 20% 240,000 396,024 80,184 2.25
420000 Wholesale trade 10% 120,000 199,944 61,260 1.30
326190Other plastics product manufacturing 5% 60,000 122,640 23,916 0.59
484000 Truck transportation 8% 96,000 174,336 51,610 1.29
H00000 Labor (Households) 30% 360,000 348,516 105,084 3.31
Imports 27% 324,000 NA NA NA
Indirect and Induced Values $ 1,241,460 $ 322,054 8.74
+ Direct Values $ 1,200,000 $ 360,000 12*
= Total Impacts $ 2,441,460 $ 682,054 20.74
Total Multiplier 2.035 1.895 1.728
* I am arbitrarily setting the direct jobs in this example at 12. Alternatively, one could look at an industry like this (other wood products) in the multiplier table and find that there were nearly 13 jobs per $1 million of output, which would multiplythrough to 15.6 jobs.
10/3/2017
21
• Fiscal impact lectures are on a separate powerpoint now
Dave Swenson 41