Upload
charlene-allen
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Rights, Continued Petition of Right (1628) –No taxes “without common consent by act of parliament” –Citizens should not be required to house soldiers (but can happen in times of martial law) English Bill of Rights (1689) –Subjects have the right to petition the king without punishment –Elections of Parliament members must be free –Freedom of speech in Parliament must be protected –No excessive bail or cruel/unusual punishment allowed –No standing army in peace time
Citation preview
Rights to RevolutionWhat would you do?
Picture Credit
Know Your Rights!• The Magna Carta (1215) guaranteed:
– King cannot take land and/or money from a citizen without Parliament’s permission (no taxes, seizures of property)
– Entitled to a fair trial “by the lawful judgment of his peers, under the law of the land.”
– King must rule according to the law of the land—no arbitrary power
• Habeas corpus— “To have the body”– Authorities cannot throw a person in jail without
informing them of the charges• Right not to incriminate yourself
Picture Credit
Rights, Continued• Petition of Right (1628)
– No taxes “without common consent by act of parliament”
– Citizens should not be required to house soldiers (but can happen in times of martial law)
• English Bill of Rights (1689)– Subjects have the right to petition the king without
punishment– Elections of Parliament members must be free– Freedom of speech in Parliament must be protected– No excessive bail or cruel/unusual punishment allowed– No standing army in peace time
Britain’s Problems
• French and Indian War—expensive ($2 million)
• Colonists "paid no more than sixpence a year against the average English taxpayer's twenty-five shillings“ (Davis)
• Need to get colonies to pay for their fair share of the war effort
Solutions?• 1. Sugar Act (1763)
– Actually lowered the tax – Problem was colonists hadn’t been paying the tax
before because they were buying smuggled goods• Colonists’ reaction: boycott sugar products• 2. Colonists given chance to tax themselves• Reaction: Collected no taxes because they thought
England would tell them they had not collected enough money
Let’s try this:• 3. Stamp Act (1765)
– Tax on any paper product– To prove tax paid, put stamp on goods
• Colonists’ Reaction:– Some colonists tarred
and feathered tax collectors
– Refuseto pay
Picture Credit
Stamp Act "Funeral"-->
OK, How About This?
• Patrick Henry decries “taxation without representation” and speaks against the King- House of Burgesses dissolved by governor- The members keep meeting in secret
• 4. Quartering Act (1765)- Provide empty buildings for housing, some food
• Reaction: Refuse to house in Boston when soldiers arrived in 1768—many soldiers set up tents on Boston Common
Post Stamp Act Congress• Stamp Act Congress Adopted Proposals 1,2,3,4, and 6
– This was a petition to the King, who they still viewed as their king
• Stamp Act (1766)– Stamp Act Repealed– Boycotts worked!!!!
• Declaratory Acts (1766)– Asserted that Parliament has authority/ right to raise
taxes • For a time, it seems that things are going to be
ok…..
And Then…• Townshend Acts (1767)
- Tax on lead, glass, paper, paint, tea- Taxes were low, but opened debate again whether Parliament had the right
to tax the colonies- Writs of Assistance- can search cargo without cause
• Reaction: Boycott on all British goods- Protests Grow• New York- dismiss assembly• Result: Repealed in 1770, except for tea tax• Boston Massacre (1770)
- One of soldiers looking for extra work- Taunted by crowd, told to find work cleaning toilets- Crowd grows, other British soldiers come to help- Crowd throws snowballs, stones etc.- Confusion: someone yells “Fire”- Soldiers fire into crowd—leaves 5 dead, 7 wounded
Reaction to “Massacre”• Samuel Adams calls it the Boston Massacre
- Paul Revere engraving is good propaganda- Soldiers appear evil, colonists innocent- Stirs up anger among the colonists
Other Reactions to “Massacre”
• John Adams defends soldiers• claimed it was defense against an angry mob• 6 not guilty• 2 charged with manslaughter (not murder)—
punishment: branded thumbs• Samuel Adams begins “committees
of correspondence” (1772)– Colonial leaders write to each other to discuss problems– Helps bring a sense of unity to colonies
Picture Credit
Britain Tries to Regain Control
• Tea tax lowered, but not repealed (1773)– Colonists paying less for tea than Englishmen or ever before– Point of this was to help establish a monopoly for the East India
Company (Parliament could then tax the company to get money from the colonists)
– Though tea was cheaper, colonists still didn’t believe Parliament had right to tax…no matter how beneficial it was to them
– Boycotted Tea- over 15 million pounds sat in warehouses
• Reaction: Boston Tea Party– Samuel Adams’ group, the “Sons of Liberty,” are the leaders of
the party– Dress as Mohawk Indians, board ships, and toss 342 chests of tea
into harbor
It’s a Tea Party
Picture Credit
Britain’s Mad Now• Result: Intolerable Acts (1774)
– Boston Harbor closed (killed Boston economy)– New rules for court and juries– Gave the royal governor of Massachussetts supreme power (no more
legislatures, no more meetings)– Quartering act revised—now have to keep soldiers in private homes
• Quebec Act– Canada under French Civil Law- Catholic Church and expanded
territory
• Reaction: Other colonies send aid to Boston – Colonies begin working together– See other colonies as friends, Britain as bad guy
First Continental Congress (1774)• Congress Video• Committees of Correspondence members meet
in Philadelphia to discuss the current situation• Advises colonists to: 1. create and arm militias
2. boycott British goods• Make list of colonial rights: Declaration of
Rights In Congress - 1774• Makes polite petition to king to fix problems
(he ignores it)• Agree to meet again if situation does not
improve
Patrick Henry (1775) “Our chains are forged, their clanking may be
heard on the plains of Boston. The war is actually begun. The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms. Our brethren are already in the field. Why stand we here idle?… Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!”