Upload
tom-trewinnard
View
215
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A case study of Meedan's Checkdesk project.
Citation preview
RIGHT TO INFORMATION CASE STUDY: CHECKDESK -‐ DEVELOPING CITIZEN JOURNALISM IN THE ARAB REGION Tom Trewinnard – Research and Communications Manager, Meedan
January 17, 2013
2
The Arab spring can be seen as product of a rapidly changing information ecosystem: With the
advent of social media, authoritarian states lost the ability to stifle dissenting narratives of
election fraud, corruption, police brutality, and protest. The growing dissonance between state
media and coverage by citizen journalists and an increasingly bold private media, and the
resulting outrage at cases such as those of Khaled Said, Mohammed Bouazizi, and Egypt's
farcical 2010 parliamentary election made societal change and reform inevitable.
Although across the Arab region authoritarian regimes have fallen or reluctantly embraced
reform, the multi-‐faceted legacy of decades of authoritarianism remains: Undeveloped media
literacy in the Middle East is impeding the ability of the citizen, and especially the young citizen,
to sort fact, opinion and rumor, make informed choices, and hold their governments to account
(Saleh, 2009) (Townson, 2012)1. The 2011 uprisings demonstrated how digital media can provide
an effective channel for dissent but, in this critical phase of constitutional and governmental
transition citizens need support to nurture transparency and accountability through evidence-‐
based journalism and to democratize political communication. In response to these needs,
Meedan has sought to develop open source tools for newsrooms that encourage journalists,
citizen journalists and media consumers to collaborate in asking questions of media, to check
the credibility of citizen and mainstream sources, and to acknowledge and propagate the best
and most accurate journalistic reporting.
1 Interview with media literacy expert Magda Abu-‐Fadil.
3
FIXING THE ECOSYSTEM -‐ WHERE TO START? When considered in their totality, the challenges facing societies trying to reform and rebuild
systems built with the specific aim of impeding transparency can seem manifold and
insurmountable. Meedan's Checkdesk project came about as a response to a discrete, but
important aspect of this challenge: helping bridge the ravine that had grown between the
Middle East's media organizations and the communities they served in a productive and
mutually beneficial manner.
As we conducted interviews with journalists at Egypt's leading newspaper, the privately owned
daily Al-‐Masry Al-‐Youm, one possible area for collaboration between journalists and
communities of readers stood out: the challenge of "verifying" the vast quantity of reports that
were proliferating online. Tweets, Facebook status updates, YouTube videos, Bambuser feeds,
and Flickr streams from a multitude of sources spread across a vast geography posed an obvious
challenge to the newsroom, and an enormous opportunity. The challenge was not only one of
how to make sense of the clamorous noise of social media, but an existential challenge of what
it meant to be a journalist at a time when millions of "readers" had become writers,
photographers, editors — a conundrum by no means unique to the newsrooms of the Middle
East. Important visionaries such as Ehab El-‐Zelaky proclaimed the value of embracing social
media as a platform for civic voice, but many journalists and editors were deeply skeptical about
citizen sources, in part because they lacked experience of using new publishing tools such as
Twitter.
An additional, perhaps more pressing challenge facing the newsroom was the print-‐first
workflow, which meant Twitter became the de facto publishing outlet in breaking news
situations. 140 characters was enough to communicate the bare bones of a breaking news
4
update, but a more agile means of publishing was needed to allow for media-‐rich coverage of
emerging stories.
CHALLENGE AND OPPORTUNITY The Checkdesk project, then, seeks to challenge existing information flows (broadly state actors
> media > public) and create new structures for participation and the development of media
literacy. Central to the project are the project partners. After a successful first phase of ideation,
development, research and training with Al-‐Masry Al-‐Youm and Birmingham City University, we
have now partnered with 5 further publishers and media collectives in 4 countries, stretching
our project through Egypt, Jordan, Palestine, Lebanon and Syria.
PARTICIPATION To support newsrooms in the challenge of publishing high quality media-‐rich reporting on
breaking events, Meedan resolved to develop an open source publishing platform that engaged
users around the checking of digital media, promoting the best efforts to a citizen journalism-‐
powered liveblog. English-‐language media organizations such as The Guardian, BBC, Huffington
Post and Al-‐Jazeera English have increasingly used the liveblog to great effect, benefitting from
the added engagement and traffic the format generates. (Thurman & Walters, 2013) We sought
to create a digital newsroom behind that publishing output: The workflow we developed allows
established communities of newsreaders (Al-‐Masry Al-‐Youm has some 1.1 million Facebook
likes) to engage in the reporting process by submitting media related to a breaking story, adding
metadata to help establish the credibility of a media item, and having their work published on
the official liveblog of a recognized media brand.
5
The below illustration [Figure 1], by former Guardian community guru Meg Pickard and
published on her blog in mid-‐2011 illustrates publishing processes as they exist and have existed
for many years, and [Figure 2] shows the publishing process we envisioned with Checkdesk:
regular publishing ("Launches") with community participating at every stage of the process.
(Pickard, 2011) This model provides a stark contrast to the top-‐down, reader as consumer, trope
that exists both in traditional media in the Middle East and more broadly in societies suffering
the legacy of chronic authoritarianism.
FIGURE 1: TRADITIONAL PUBLISHING PROCESS
6
FIGURE 2: PARTICIPATORY PUBLISHING PROCESS
MEDIA LITERACY As stated earlier in the report, another consequence of the lack of a free and independent
media is the emergence of a citizenry deeply suspicious of media institutions and of what has
been described by one academic as a "mal-‐media situation in [the] Middle East and North
Africa" (Saleh, 2009).
Most of the people are unimpressed and unmoved, and less concerned than ever about their governments’ policy directions, as they are victims of a sort of media fatigue, due to the persistent feeling that double standards for information persist, that civic engagement is subject to too many hurdles and that rhetorical commitment to democracy and freedom often serves the personal priorities of the chosen few. The main challenge remains on how to educate the members of the public and empower them to ask for their civil rights and hold their governments responsible for their public obligations. (Ibid.)
Checkdesk seeks to address this challenge in terms of bridging "the widening gap between the
general public and the journalists" (Ibid.) as previously described. Parallel to this track, we
7
partnered with Birmingham City University to develop a training program to more directly target
the roots of underdeveloped media literacy: A lack of media education leading to poor
standards for critically assessing the media. Training workshops using BCU resources, developed
in collaboration with local trainers, focus on giving participants journalistic skills with which to
assess digital media, and on demonstrating the value and importance of a critical media
environment. By the end of 2013 over 1000 citizens of the 5 nations in which we are operating
will have received training in such skills.
CONCLUSION Across the Arab world, the withholding of the right to information has been central to the
survival of decades of authoritarian rule. Ministries of Information exercised tight control over
what information was made public through state media and stifled independent media to the
extent that self-‐censorship became instilled in many newsrooms (The Economist 2011). This
censorship, combined with inadequate media education has led to increasing public
disenfranchisement with media and channels of information, which in turn consolidated poor
levels of media literacy. Meedan's Checkdesk project, with its focus on benefitting from the
opportunities presented by digital media and an emphasis on building strong partnerships with
and between leading media producers, seeks to redress this imbalance in media access, and
empower the citizens of the Arab world to pursue and demand their right to transparency and
accountability.
8
BIBLIOGRAPHY Pickard, M. (2011, May 5). Creative collaborations & conversations. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from Publishing process and opportunities for community collaboration: http://www.megpickard.com/archive/publishing-‐process-‐and-‐opportunities-‐for-‐community-‐collaboration/
Saleh, I. (2009). Media Literacy in MENA: Moving beyond the Vicious Cycle of Oxymore. United Nations. The United Nations-‐Alliance of Civilizations in co-‐operation with Grupo Comunicar .
Thurman, N., & Walters, A. (2013). LIive blogging-‐ Digital journalism's pivotal platform? Digital Journalism , 1 (1), 82-‐101.
Townson, P. (2012, October 25). Doha Centre for Media Freedom. Retrieved January 15, 2013, from Experienced journalist and media literacy expert on developing the Arab media: http://www.dc4mf.org/en/content/experienced-‐journalist-‐and-‐media-‐literacy-‐expert-‐developing-‐arab-‐media-‐0