MPA CONTRACT NO. A308-S3 PROGRAM, PROJECT AND DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM –

INTEGRATOR. ADDENDA

& RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS

September 02, 2016 The attention of consultants submitting proposals for the RFI is called to the following Addenda & Responses to Questions to the subject RFI. The items set forth herein, whether of omission, addition, substitution, or clarifications are all to be included in and form a part of the proposal submitted. Addenda:

1. Please refer to attached pricing template to be submitted with RFQ Responses to Questions:

1. Should a consultant be awarded the subject contract, would they be precluded from other future work with MassPort in any capacity (Design, Consulting, Advisory, CM,etc)?

No.

2. Can Massport please provide the list of functional/business requirements for Adept 2013. Requirements include drawing lookup, markup, download, and distribution/transmittal of documents, support of multiple file formats including both CAD and BIM files, drawing and model viewer, as well as version control for all documents. Search functionality through library card and includes filters.

3. In the materials and discussion last week Massport requested the P6 integration be a bi-directional data transfer. From the discussion, the schedule is going to be managed in P6 and needs to push data to the PMIS system for reporting purposes. As Massport identified this as bi-directional, what data does Massport envision being managed in the PMIS system and sent back to P6? Or, does the data transfer really only need to be from P6 to the PMIS system?

The desire is to have the P6 integration be a bidirectional data transfer. P6 data will be pushed to the PMIS system for reporting while cost data will need to be pushed from the PMIS system to P6 to generate cash flows.

2

4. Does Adept 2013 have an API?

Yes. Please note Massport is currently using Adept 2014.

5. Can Massport please provide a sample of the data entered into B2G. Please see attached for LCP & B2G form data.

6. Can Massport please provide the MS Excel spreadsheet templates used for import into

Hyperion Capital? Please refer to attached Capital Plan Components Presentation

7. How many years of project data does Massport want migrated from Contract Manager?

N/A – no documents are attached in Contract Manager

8. Can Massport please provide samples of the Infomaker reports you want duplicated within the

new PMIS system? Please see attached for sample InfoMaker Reports.

9. Are you looking to have the Integrator/Program Manager be the lead on the response or the

Software vendor? There are a number of questions regarding the company profile, size, revenue, experience, etc. Is this to be the Integrator information or the software vendor company information and ultimately, who should the final RFP come from. Massport’s preference is to have the Integrator be the lead for this solicitation but will also accept submissions lead by the software vendor. Information regarding the company profile applies to whoever the lead is.

10. When it comes to licensing the software is it your expectation that the actual license agreement T’s & C’s etc. would be between Massport and the software vendor or through the integrator.

The contract with the integrator will be structured whereby the license agreements will be between Massport and the software vendor.

3

11. How many users from MASSPORT and external (Non – MASSPORT employees) users are expected?

Please refer to attached pricing spreadsheet.

12. Can you please provide an example of a current Program Level p6 schedule and is the schedule resource loaded (cost and or man power)? Please see attached for Schedule Toolkit Narrative.

13. What are the primary reports from each system and what is the frequency of each report and data date methodology?

a. PCM/InfoMaker Capital Reports library (run as desktop executables, some with real

time data, some with date criteria entered by users when prompted): Overview Report; PM Cost Report; Invoice Report; Requisition Report; Advertised Opportunity Report; EAC Report; WO Summary Report; Planholders Report.

b. PCM/InfoMaker Quarterly Reports: Rolled up financial summaries by facility; financial summaries broken out by facility and grouped by program and project number; construction and consultant awards; construction contract change orders and consultant contract amendments; Designer Selection Panel (DSP) activity; Construction awards with M/W/DBE participation (Minimum % and intended %); CM@Risk Project Status Report.

c. ACES –

Daily Reports: Active Contracts (Executed) for Capital Projects --shows all contracts

executed that are charged to capital projects. Work Flow - In Process -- shows all of the project controls contract administrator’s contracts that are currently in the ACES workflow, sent to project controls contract administrator. Weekly Reports: Cycle Time Report for Capital Programs -- shows all Capital Programs originated contracts and the time required to cycle through the ACES workflow. All Active Contracts for Capital Programs -- Contracts Originated in Capital Programs, or funding charged to Capital Programs, or charged to a Capital Project, sent to Project Controls. Weekly All Active Contracts (executed) for Capital Programs Department -- shows all Capital Programs executed in the previous 4 weeks, sent to Project Controls.

4

On Demand: IT Contracts with Capital Project Funding -- shows all in-process contracts originated in IT that are charged to a capital project, Project Controls as needed.

Adept – None DDMS – None

Hyperion – Board approved Capital Program: http://www.massport.com/media/384937/FY16-20-Capital-Program-with-Presentation-Cover.pdf

14. Project controls related cost and schedule updates: what is the update and reporting schedule?

Schedule updates and reporting are performed monthly. Cost updates are continuous but reported monthly.

15. Is Single Sign On / SSO a requirement?

TBD 16. Are there any security requirements specifically around data transfers between systems?

Please refer to Exhibit C – Information System Security General Standards and Questionnaire in the A308-S3 Request for Qualifications - Supplemental Information document.

17. What features and functions are required in order to consider replacements for ADEPT?

Requirements for the replacement of Adept must include the following: drawing lookup, markup, download, and distribution/transmittal of documents, support of multiple file formats including both CAD and BIM files, drawing and model viewer, as well as version control for all documents. A replacement system should also be able to handle all existing files. Search functionality should include filters. The ability to overlay documents to view changes would also be a preferred. The system must also have password protection for SSI and for tracking drawing access. Should this information be made available to Massport Consultants or project teams, it will require various permissions are in place.

18. What is the approximate (or exact) number of Active and Completed projects that will be migrated in Contract Manager?

N/A – no documents are attached in Contract Manager

19. What isand agg

N/A – n

20. Can youother sy

Finance

Cost

s the volumegregate)

no documen

u please proystem and h

e Code Stru

Code Struc

e of transac

ts are attach

ovide a list ohow they rel

ucture –

cture –

ctions that w

hed in Cont

of the financlate?

5

will be migra

tract Manag

ce codes fro

ated from C

ger

om PeopleSo

Contract Ma

oft and cost

anager (per

t codes used

r project

d in any

21. Can youand how Please s

22. Do any provide

Please r

23. What a

None

u please prow it is used i

see response

forms existed?

refer to wor

re the KPI’

ovide a descin each syst

e to question

t related to t

rkflows prov

s and Start

cription or etem (i.e. bro

n 20

the ACES C

vided under

Centers in

6

explanation oken out by

Contract Ap

r Exhibit B

Maximo th

of the finansegment)?

pproval pro

of RFQ

hat MASSPO

nce code str

cess? If so c

ORT wants

ructure (Peo

can samples

to see in a P

opleSoft)

s be

PMIS?

7

24. Can you provide a sample of the format and level of detail of data to transfer from Contract Manager?

a. Project Information – Contacts Module b. Communication – Notepads Module (custom report codes only) c. Contract Information – Cost Worksheet, Contracts-Budgeted, Contracts-Committed,

Contracts-Funding, Purchase Orders, Trends, Requisitions, Procurement, Change Orders, Proposed Change Orders (M/W/DBE Reporting only)

d. Logs – Submittals (not Submittal Packages)

25. Can you please provide information about the API capabilities of LCP Tracker and B2G?

Please contact LCP Tracker and B2Gnow directly for this information

26. Is there a requirement or criteria for what capital asset information needs to be transferred from PMIS to Maximo?

Yes. Assuming PMIS will be used for Cx, the data collected on assets will be needed for Maximo. Also, links to O&M manuals will be required for Maximo.

27. Which departments are using Hyperion for planning?

Hyperion Capital Planning is used by Capital Programs and Administration & Finance (A&F).

28. Can you confirm that your standard terms and conditions are here: http://www.massport.com/media/384943/Work-Order-No-Design-Language-Standard-Contract-3-.pdf

Confirmed

29. Is there an M/D/WBE Requirement? If so please provide the contract requirements. Though there are no M/WBE requirements for this solicitation, Massport encourages teams to include M/WBE firms as part of their team.

 

8

30. Which current applications will require master data/legacy data to be migrated from the old to the new systems? How many records and what level of detail will be required for each application?

N/A – no documents are attached in Contract Manager

31. Will Massport be providing any staff to migrate data or will the Integrator be expected to complete this work?

It might be more feasible for MPA to provide staff to assist with the migration of data. This will be determined upon review of the RFQs

32. What is the criteria for determining the completion of the Implementation/Integration?

N/A

33. Should the Integrator assume adoption and deployment at Logan only or all MPA facilities?

All MPA Facilities

34. What level of involvement have the various MPA system owners/departments committed to? How many FTE’s and what percentage of availability can be expected?

MPA staff will be made available as required by the agreed upon implementation schedule

35. Will only Massport employees be trained or will contractor training be included with the implementation?

Please refer to attached pricing spreadsheet.

36. What is information / data fields are stored in DDMS?

The following fields are in DDMS; Facility, Project Number, Filename, Project Type, Sheet Type, Project Name, Sheet Description, Building Name, Building Number, Geographic Location, MPA Project Manager, Consultant Name, Geographical Grid Location, Contractor, Project year, tenant name, and file type. DDMS stores metadata for each drawing sheet (160,000 to date). This database is also linked to our Utility Management System (UMS) which stores Water, Drain, Sewer, and Gas utilities information for Logan Airport.

9

37. Should an electronic user/training guide be included in the pricing?

Yes.

38. Which current software applications have API’s?

Oracle PCM, Oracle P6, Oracle Hyperion – Please contact Oracle for API information on these application.

39. Where is each current software system hosted (internal/external)?

PCM, ACES – internal

Hyperion, P6, LCP Tracker, B2G--external

40. Will the system administrator be an internal Massport employee during implementation or should one be provided?

System administrator will be an internal Massport employee

41. What are the intended next steps in the process following the 9/29 submission date?

Massport will review the RFQ submissions and may elect to conduct interviews. Upon the selection of an integrator/software vendor, a kickoff meeting will be held to discuss scope, expectations, schedule, and contract structure.

42. Will there be follow up interviews with Systems Integrators or a down-selection process? Massport will review the RFQ submissions and may elect to conduct interviews.

43. Does Massport have a preference for an on premise or Cloud deployment?

Massport’s preference is for cloud deployment

44. What is the target date for Massport’s final decision? Massport will review the RFQ submissions and may elect to conduct interviews.

45. Approximately how many users does Massport anticipate across the department? Are contractors included in this scope? If so, approximately how many? Can you provide a sense of the types of users included in this scope? (i.e. Executive, Power Users, etc.)

10

Please refer to attached pricing spreadsheet.

46. Does the “data transfer from existing systems” section speak to data integration (ongoing) or data migration (one time)? Some of the systems listed in the data transfer section don’t appear to be on the list of potential replacements while others appear to have the potential for replacement.

Please refer to attached pricing spreadsheet.

47. For the Tenant Alteration Application (TAA) program, is this a possible point of integration

with an existing system, or is the expectation that the proposed solution/software completely delivers these requirements.

This will be determined during the discovery phase of the project.

48. In the future state, does the P6 environment remain in a hosted environment with Loadspring Solutions? It is Massport’s intent to have P6 remain hosted with Loadspring, however if the integrator can demonstrate a compelling case for hosting P6 on their own cloud, Massport will entertain the option How many P6 instances and/or databases are currently being utilized? Currently one (1) database is being utilized

49. Does Massport currently have an Enterprise Scheduling Management model? Does Massport

have project schedule templates? If so, are you able to elaborate? Does Massport currently resource load schedules?

Please see attached for the MPA P6 EPS and Schedule Toolkit Narrative.

50. What modules in CM is Massport currently using?

a. Project Information – Contacts Module b. Communication – Notepads Module (custom report codes only) c. Contract Information – Cost Worksheet, Contracts-Budgeted, Contracts-Committed,

Contracts-Funding, Purchase Orders, Trends, Requisitions, Procurement, Change Orders, Proposed Change Orders (M/W/DBE Reporting only)

d. Logs – Submittals (not Submittal Packages)

11

51. Are you able to provide copies of your customized Primavera Contract Management reports?

Please see attached for sample InfoMaker Reports.

52. Are you able to provide a complete list of functionality currently being leveraged in Adept? Are there areas that are available to you today that you are not using? See question 18. Yes, Adept has features we are not currently utilizing. See their website for more information: http://www.synergissoftware.com/features/index.html

53. Is there an expected start date and/or project time frame for this work? Massport will review the RFQ submissions and may elect to conduct interviews. Please refer to attached pricing spreadsheet.

54. How many Users are estimated to require access to the new PM System (full and guest)? Please refer to attached pricing spreadsheet.

55. Roughly how many Users currently have access to:

PCM-20 users ACES-325 users Hyperion,-Capital Planning application only-8 users Adept 2013-100 users DDMS-5 users

56. Has Massport set any guidelines / criteria on what data will be migrated into the new System?

If so, what criteria has been set (ie. Only active data, only new projects, etc)? And is there a rough estimate on how much project data will be migrated into the new System? Please refer to attached pricing spreadsheet.

57. Currently, in what System and how are Projects initiated?

Projects are managed in PCM but initiated in Hyperion.

12

58. Currently, where do Project budgets reside? RFP clearly states POs and Payments are in PeopleSoft and Contracts and Amendments are stored in PCM. Project budget information is stored in Hyperion, PCM and P6.

59. Is there a preference between Fixed Cost or T&M proposals?

No preference

60. Is there a preference for On Prem or Cloud Hosted solutions? Massport’s preference is for cloud deployment

61. Can Massport confirm the requirement to submit 25 hard copies and 1 electronic copy by mail to Massport.

Confirmed

62. The Cover sheets reference this procurement as a Request for Qualifications. Please clarify

that this is a Request for Proposals, as costs are requested as part of the response and are part of the evaluation criteria. Cover sheet is accurate this is a Request for Qualifications with a request for pricing. Pricing represents one of the selection criteria.

63. Are standard forms required (SF330, MBE/WBE forms, Insurance, etc.) in the response? No

64. RFQ pages 3-5 Table of Applications: The table of applications included on Pages 3-5 of 30, appears to be missing item 11. Please confirm there is no item 11. Confirmed - Item 11 does not exist.

P. 6 Scope of Work: 65. For non-reseller integrators, what is your preferred approach to the software procurement:

o Massport executes contract/software license agreement with the shortlisted vendor, and separate contract with integrator

o Integrator executes contract/software license agreement with the shortlisted vendor; Massport executes contract with integrator

13

When would Massport want to take assignment of the contract/software license agreement in this case?

o Other

The contract with the integrator will be structured whereby the license agreements will be between Massport and the software vendor

66. Can short-listed software vendors submit without an integrator team member? Yes

67. With respect to the B2G system, can the form data be made available? Please see attached for LCP & B2G form data.

68. With respected to P6, which data points will be tracked? What data will need to be passed from the PMIS to P6? Please refer to question #3 for answer.

69. For the systems to be replaced, will the replacement occur through the new selected PMIS or through an additional third party software package?

Replacement will occur through the new selected PMIS

70. On p. 7, the RFQ says, “Based on the requirements identified in this section, identify the approach for implementation and provide examples where applicable based on prior experience with the system proposed and other public sector agency experience in or out of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.” There follow six (6) pages of requirements. Where should our responses be included in the Proposal Contents described on pages 14 – 16? Under Section G “Technical Requirements”

71. P. 7 System and Environment: What does a “Conference Room Pilot” entail and how long is its duration? This will be part of the testing phase.

72. P. 13 “Describe what architecture will be used to integrate… with details on designed latencies for each system integration.” What is meant by designed latencies?

It is refbetweenschedulit design

Overallbe prefe

P. 15 H

73. MPA reFinanciother.

• PQ

• Pto

• Pa MFCFBtore

ferring to thn different sled job, whaned to be up

l, a system aerred since

. Integratioepresentativial Coding a

Please explaiQuestion 21 Please explaio Question 2

Please explaind finance c

MPA can deFor exampleClass can imFinal FundinBest-practiceo a separateeporting/ext

he latencies (systems. Forat is the freqpdated.

architecturedata in syst

n: ves mentionand Cost Co

in and prov

in and prov21 in and provcodes are in

rive elemene:

mply Fund dng code can e is typicallye field; onlytracts

(lags) that ar example ifquency of th

e that providtems of inter

ned during toding are di

vide the stru

vide the stru

vide an examndependent

nts of financ

ue to 1:M rimply Fina

y to treat 1:y reason to s

14

are considerf data transhe job or if t

des the requrest are syn

the “Open Sifferent, MP

ucture/comp

ucture/comp

mple of how

ce codes from

elationshipal Funding CM as levels

split to a sep

red in the arsfer is designthere is an A

uired integrnced nearer

Session” on PA was able

ponents of th

ponents of th

w you derive

m other fina

Category du within the parate field

rchitecture ned to be ruAPI connec

ration with mto real-time

August 12 te to “derive”

he Cost Cod

he Finance

e one from t

ance code fi

ue to 1:M rehierarchy v is to suppo

for data floun as a tion, how fr

minimal late.

that, althou” one from t

des. Please r

Codes Plea

he other. Co

ields.

elationshipversus splittort

ow

requent is

tency will

ugh the

refer to

se refer

ost codes

ting out

15

74. Adept • What version and modules of Adept is Massport using?

2014 SP3 Version 8.8.3.13 • Does this version of Adept have an API?

Yes • Does Adept have a means of batch uploading drawings and their library card

information? Yes

• Does Adept have a means of batch downloading drawings and their library card information? Yes

• Please provide metadata (library card information) that is associated with drawings and that Massport currently uses. Please indicate which metadata fields are not used by Massport. Massport currently uses the following: Project number, year, name, and type (design or as-built), file name, file type, created by, creation date, file date, revision date, building name, building number(s), retired building number(s), building floor(s), geographic location, multiple location and additional location, MPA project number, tenant name, consultant name, contractor name, sheet type, first sheet in set, SSI, AutoCAD files, construction specs, sheet description. The fields on the library card are customizable and therefore the metadata fields not used can be infinite.

• On p. 3, the RFQ states that there are 150,000 d r a w i n g s stored in Adept. On p. 11 it states that there are 150,000 projects currently stored in Adept. Please clarify. There are 150,000 drawings, not projects.

75. Maximo: o Please provide a listing of asset types to be tracked and the information (e.g.,

manufacturer, model) to be captured for each type Please see attached. Attributes are in a state of development and are not included in this response.

o Is Massport planning to use Maximo to manage documents such as warranty certificates? Yes

o Is Massport planning to associate/link such documents with Maximo records? Yes o Is Massport planning to manage any service contracts through the Project and

Document Management System, or will these be managed in Maximo?

16

We anticipate having both Term Construction Contracts and Maintenance Service Agreements will be managed through Maximo

76. B2G: • Does B2G have an API? Please contact B2Gnow directly for this information. • Is Massport aware of any methods that allow bulk uploading of contracts, subcontractors,

payments, etc, into B2G? Please describe. No • Is Massport aware of any methods that allow bulk downloading of sub payments from

B2G? No o If yes, what format is provided – .pdf, .xls, .doc, other?

77. LCP Tracker • Does LCP Tracker have an API? Please contact LCP Tracker directly for this information • What information from LCP Tracker does Massport use? Capital Programs uses LCP

Tracker to verify and manage prevailing wage certified payrolls. o How does Massport access that information:

Go to LCP site to check? Yes • How frequently does Massport check? Capital Programs checks on an

as needed basis. • Who is responsible for checking (one person in Compliance, each

Project Manager, etc.)? In Capital Programs, Project Controls has access (2 people). Two controls consultants also have LCP Tracker access, but only for their respective projects.

• Does Massport download any information from LCP Tracker? o If yes, in what format (.pdf, .xls, .doc, prints out hardcopy) is

the information delivered? Capital Programs downloads certain reports on as needed basis. Primarily these reports are extracted in either .pdf or .xls format.

Does LCP provide reports? Not automatically. Reports can be generated • How frequently? On as needed basis. • In what format (.pdf, .xls, .doc, etc.) The reports can be ran as .pdf,

.doc, and .xls • How is the report delivered – email, other? If report is generated as

.doc or .xls a pop-up window prompts you to save the file. If the report is generated as a .pdf it will open in a web based pdf viewer.

• Who receives the report(s) (one person in Compliance, each Project Manager, etc.)? Whoever runs the report.

17

• Please provide a sample of the report(s) Reports typically run, contain security sensitive information.

78. PCM: o What project information is currently tracked in PCM (data fields)? o How much data? PCM Database is SQL; size of database is 3.5GB. o How many projects? Approximately 3,000 projects o Any documents linked? No

• Is there a standardized project template or does each project do it differently? Yes, “Massport Default Project Template” in PCM.

o If standardized, please provide a copy N/A • Is it correct that, currently, data transfers into PCM from Hyperion and PeopleSoft and

from PCM to PeopleSoft are all handled via spreadsheet? No. Invoice and construction requisition transactions are handled via Dimension Integration Manager without files. The once-per-year capital program integration from Hyperion to PCM is a file-based integration.

o Please provide samples of these spreadsheets Please see attached • Is project schedule data currently transferred to/from P6? No

o If so, how? N/A • How many reports will need to be recreated? Exact number will be determined in the

discovery phase of the project. o Please provide samples of each Please see attached

• Does Massport have a perpetual license(s) for PCM? Yes • Is PCM installed on Massport-owned hardware? Yes • What is Massport’s retention schedule for electronic documents related to project costs?

Massport follows’ the state guidelines for record retention

79. ACES: • What are the data fields associated with contracts in ACES? Please refer to workflows

provided under Exhibit B of RFQ • Are contracts stored as documents? Yes

Within the ACES system? Yes Linked to folder structure on network? No

o How is Customer and Vendor information transferred from PeopleSoft to ACES (file, API, other?) N/A to this scope

What are the data fields passed? If a file transfer, please provide an example of the format

o How many reports will need to be recreated? There are probably about 10 to 12 reports that will have to be created

18

• Please provide sample of each Reports typically run, contain security sensitive information.

80. Hyperion:

• What data (field names and expected contents) is currently exported from Hyperion to PCM? Please see attached Hyperion to PCM extract example

o Is this data transferred via spreadsheet? Yes • Is any information currently transferred from PCM to Hyperion? No

o If yes, how is this data transferred? N/A o If file based, please provide an example of the format N/A

81. P. 15-16 V.I. Cost: Should the cost proposal be included in a separate envelope? No. P. 16 M. Litigation and Legal Proceedings: Does Massport want litigation proceedings for all team members or only the prime?

Just the prime Exhibit B: Exhibit B contains workflow for the ACES systems. Are workflows available for all applications, processes, and systems that are addressed in this RFP? Workflows will be provided upon the selection of an integrator.

82. Could you provide the number of users both internally and externally you would envision being users on the system.

Please refer to attached pricing spreadsheet.

83. Could you provide the expected average annual capital project spend per year over the next 3

years.

Our Capital Program anticipates Capital expenditures between $400 and $450 million annually.

--------