67
Soil Management Plan (SMP) Park Reconstruction Project Part of Mooney’s Bay Park, Ottawa Revision: 0 (Final) Prepared for: Real Estate Partnerships & Development Office Realty Initiatives & Development Branch 110 Laurier Avenue West, 5 th Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Prepared by: Project Number: 15-200-8 Document ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0 June 2, 2016

Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan (SMP) Park Reconstruction Project Part of Mooney’s Bay Park, Ottawa

Revision: 0 (Final)

Prepared for: Real Estate Partnerships & Development Office Realty Initiatives & Development Branch 110 Laurier Avenue West, 5th Floor Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Prepared by:

Project Number: 15-200-8

Document ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

June 2, 2016

Page 2: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

Title: Soil Management Plan Park Reconstruction Project Part of Mooney’s Bay Park, Ottawa

Client: City of Ottawa Project Number: 15-200-8 Document ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0 Revision Number: 0 Date: June 2, 2016 Prepared by: Steve Gaines Reviewed by: Sean Sterling

Approved by:

Sean Sterling

June 2, 2016 i

Page 3: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope ................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Applicable Site Condition Standards and Guidelines .......................................................... 1

1.3.1 On-Site Soil ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.2 Off-Site Soil ................................................................................................................... 2

1.4 Existing Soil Conditions ........................................................................................................ 2 1.4.1 Site Stratigraphy ........................................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 Soil Quality.................................................................................................................... 3

2 GENERAL SOIL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS .................................................................................. 5

3 SITE SPECIFIC SOIL MANAGEMENT APPROACH ...................................................................... 6 3.1 Excess Soil Management Options ........................................................................................ 6 3.2 Soil Excavation and Handling ............................................................................................... 6

3.2.1 Temporary Soil Management ........................................................................................ 7 3.2.2 Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analysis ......................................................................... 7 3.2.3 Forms and Documentation for Transportation Off-Site .................................................. 7

3.3 Risk Management ................................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Hazardous Materials .............................................................................................................. 8 3.5 Additional Considerations ..................................................................................................... 8

4 POTENTIAL RECEIVING SITES FOR EXCESS SOIL ................................................................... 9 4.1 Off-Site Disposal .................................................................................................................... 9

4.1.1 Trail Road Landfill ......................................................................................................... 9 4.1.2 Local Quarries .............................................................................................................. 9

5 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 10

6 CLOSURE ..................................................................................................................................... 11

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A Figures APPENDIX B Site Preparation and Grading Plan APPENDIX C Laboratory Analytical Results

June 2, 2016 ii

Page 4: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

1 INTRODUCTION

Geofirma Engineering Ltd. has prepared the following Soil Management Plan (SMP) for the City of Ottawa to provide a guideline for the management of excess, excavated materials generated during construction of the a new 4,650 m2 (50,000 ft2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site is provided in Figure 1, Appendix A.

The following document has been prepared following an email request from Mr. David Kiar, Adviser, Environmental Remediation, Real Estate Partnerships & Development Office with the City of Ottawa on May 16, 2016 and in accordance with City of Ottawa Standing Offer Agreement RFSO 19614-91843-S01.

1.1 Project Background

The SMP described herein supports construction activities associated with removal of the existing outdoor fitness park and installation of a new playground to be constructed on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. The new playground will encompass an area of approximately 4,650 m2. Construction details submitted to Geofirma indicate that the footprint of excavation for constructing the playground sub-base will be approximately 4,080 m2. Furthermore, the Site Preparation and Grading Plan provided by the City of Ottawa (dated May 16, 2016), and included in Appendix B, shows that the depth of sub-grade relative to the existing ground surface elevation as 0.2 m. Based on the area and depth estimates provided, the anticipated volume of excavated soil is approximately 850 m3, or 1700 tonnes.

1.2 Purpose and Scope

The objective of this SMP is to provide a framework for the management of excess, excavated soil during construction activities. This includes evaluating the potential for reuse of excavated soil on-site, where applicable, and options for off-site transport and disposal of excess material. This applies to both material considered to be contaminated or non-contaminated with respect to the site condition standards discussed below.

1.3 Applicable Site Condition Standards and Guidelines

1.3.1 On-Site Soil

On-site soil quality is evaluated in accordance with both federal guidelines and provincial standards. The study area is owned by the National Capital Commission and Parks Canada, which are federal government agencies. As such, the following federal guidelines have been used for soil quality assessment:

• Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) Soil Quality Guidelines (CCME, 1999 as updated).

In addition, the following Ontario Ministry of the Environment (now Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, MOECC) standards and guidance documents have been applied to evaluate soil material encountered at the site:

June 2, 2016 1

Page 5: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

• Ontario Ministry of the Environment Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (MOE, 2011), as amended. o Table 1: Full Depth Background Site Condition Standards; o Table 3: Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Ground Water

Condition; o Table 9: Generic Site Condition Standards for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-

Potable Groundwater Condition;

• Management of Excess Soil – A Guide for Best Management Practices (MOECC, 2014).

MOECC Table 9 standards are applicable to this site because the site is located within 30 m of the Rideau River, and Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended) states that Table 9 is to be applied where “all or part of the property lies within 30 m of a surface water body”

1.3.2 Off-Site Soil

For evaluation of off-site management options for excess soil material generated during the project, the applicable guidelines and standards are dependent on where the material is proposed to be moved to. For the purpose of this soil management plan, Geofirma assumes that the soil will either move to non-federally owned land that is services by municipal water supply (e.g. another City of Ottawa construction project), or will be disposed of at a MOECC licensed landfill. As such, for off-site soil management decisions, the following MOECC standards and guidance documents are applicable:

• MOECC Table 1 (Background) Standards;

• MOECC Table 3 (Non-potable) Standards; and,

• Schedule IV Leachate Quality Criteria, Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 558/00, General Waste Management, as amended.

1.4 Existing Soil Conditions

Geofirma's understanding of existing soil conditions (soil stratigraphy and quality) has been determined through a review of the following reports that have recently been prepared for the City of Ottawa:

• Geofirma Engineering Ltd., 2016a. Soil Investigation and Characterization, Mooney’s Bay Park, Ottawa, Ontario. Revision R0. June.

• Geofirma Engineering Ltd., 2016b. Preliminary Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park, Ottawa, Ontario. Revision R0. June.

A total of 19 test pits were completed in April 2016 as part of the soil investigations competed by Geofirma. Details regarding sampling methodology, soil stratigraphy and laboratory testing results are summarized in the Soil Investigation and Characterization report (Geofirma Engineering Ltd., 2016a).

June 2, 2016 2

Page 6: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

1.4.1 Site Stratigraphy

Based on the field observations, sampling and analyses completed as part of the soil investigations (Geofirma Engineering Ltd., 2016a), four soil categories are used for the purpose of soil management discussions with respect to the Mooney’s Bay Park playground reconstruction project. These four soil categories include: Topsoil, Fill Unit 1, Fill Unit 2, and Native Glacial Till. Descriptions of each soil type are provided below. The site layout, showing the location of test pits competed during the soil investigation project is provided as Figure 2, in Appendix A.

Topsoil

• Characterized as brown sand with organic material and various amounts of silt and gravel. Topsoil is generally encountered between 0.2 and 0.3 mBGS, although in some locations topsoil thickness was only 0.1 m.

Fill Unit 1

• Characterized as brown to brown-grey sand with gravel and silt. The amount of gravel and fines (silt/clay) is highly variable. In general, Fill Unit 1 included minimal debris (i.e. brick, concrete, asphalt or wood).

• This fill unit was encountered primarily in areas that are interpreted to be outside of the historical ornamental ponds (i.e. TP16-02, TP16-06, TP16-14 and TP16-15) and at approximate depths between 0.3 and 1.0 mBGS.

Fill Unit 2

• Characterized as gravelly sand to sandy gravel fill with significant amounts of construction related debris, including concrete, rebar, asphalt, wood (lumber), as well as less amounts of miscellaneous fill such as rubber, aluminum cans and plastic. No obvious signs of gross contamination (i.e. pure phase product or sheen) was noted during the soil investigation program. This fill unit is often dark grey to black in colour.

• Fill Unit 2 was primarily encountered in the areas interpreted to be in or around the historical ornamental ponds.

Native Glacial Till

• Grey to brown-grey sandy silt with gravel and clay. Includes rounded cobbles and boulders. Iron stating was noted in the clay and no debris was observed.

1.4.2 Soil Quality

The investigation identified several exceedences of applicable CCME Guidelines and MOECC Standards across the site, primarily in the fill units. A summary of soil quality within each soil category is listed below:

Topsoil

• No exceedences of federal of provincial criteria for metals parameters. Minor exceedences of CCME SQG for PAH parameters. MOECC Table 1,3 and 9 Standards are exceeded for several PAH parameters in the sample collected from TP16-09-1; however, topsoil was noted as particularly thin in that location (0.1m) and it is likely that fill material was included in the surficial sample (0-0.15 mBGS) that resulted in the detections of PAH parameters.

June 2, 2016 3

Page 7: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

Fill Unit 1

• Various metals and PAH parameters, were detected above CCME SQG and MOECC Table 1, 3 and 9 Standards.

Fill Unit 2

• Similar to Fill Unit 1, various metals and PAH parameters were detected above CCME SQG and MOECC Table 1, 3 and 9 Standards.

Native Glacial Till

• No samples of till were submitted for analysis during the soil investigation program.

June 2, 2016 4

Page 8: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

2 GENERAL SOIL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS

While it is understood that only the upper 0.2 m of soil material is to be excavated as part of this project, the following generic options are available for management of different classes of excavated soil material:

1) Soil below MOECC Table 1 Standards (i.e. background) can be considered clean (inert) fill and is suitable for reuse on-site or transported off-site without restriction and used as clean fill.

2) Soil exceeding MOECC Table 1 Standards but meets the standards applicable to the Site (MOECC Table 9 in this case) can be re-used on the site. If not re-used onsite, this material can be re-used at an appropriate soil receiving site, provided the soil meets the applicable receiving site standards and the proper documentation is in place. Alternatively, if an appropriate receiving site is not available, this soil can be disposed of at a MOECC licensed waste disposal site.

3) Any material with soil concentrations above applicable standards (i.e. MOECC Table 9 in this case) is considered to be waste and must be disposed of at a MOECC licensed waste disposal site, or will require an assessment of risk to determine the suitability of the material to remain at the Site coupled with any applicable risk management measures.. The preliminary risk assessment completed for the site has considered current soil conditions/stratigraphy and changes to the soil conditions due to excavation and backfilling may require additional risk calculations.

June 2, 2016 5

Page 9: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

3 SITE SPECIFIC SOIL MANAGEMENT APPROACH

3.1 Excess Soil Management Options

The specifications for the proposed playground include a 300 mm layer of engineered wood fiber material overlying 150 mm of crushed stone, therefore it is anticipated that not all of the excavated material can, or will, be reused on-site.

As such, the following guidance is provided for management of excess excavated soil off-site from the Mooney’s Bay Park Site:

1) Based on the soil concentrations in the topsoil and the assessment of risk completed by Geofirma (2016b), this material is considered suitable for reuse at the Mooney's Bay Site. However, it is understood that during excavation activities it is possible that this topsoil material could be mixed with the upper shallow fill material when excavating to approximately 200mm below grade as the topsoil in some locations is thinner than 200 mm and the control of the excavator depth is not sufficient to eliminate this possibility. Therefore, given that there is a sporadic exceedence of applicable site standards in the topsoil and the potential for mixing with the underlying fill, temporary stockpiling and additional sampling will be required as discussed in Section 3.3 and Section 3.6 to confirm its suitability for reuse. As much of the topsoil as possible should be reused as backfill or landscaping material on-site, with the remainder being transported off-site to a suitable receiving site or alternately a licensed MOECC landfill facility.

2) Based on the numerous exceedences of metals, PHC and PAH concentrations compared to applicable Site Standards (MOECC Table 9), all fill material should be considered to be unsuitable for reuse at the Mooney's Bay site and will require off-site management at a suitable receiving site or disposal at an MOECC licensed landfill facility. As the Mooney's Bay site standards (MOECC Table 9) are more restrictive compared to non-federally owned sites with non-potable conditions situated further than 30 m from surface water, there is the potential that this material can be managed where the soil concentrations meet the less restrictive site specific standards for the receiving site (e.g. MOECC Table 3).

3) Although construction activities at the Mooney's Bay Site are not planned to excavate any native till below the fill units, it should be noted that till samples were not collected during the soil investigation program. A representative sample of till should be submitted for analysis to determine if it satisfies MOECC Table 1 Standards and can be assumed to be inert fill, or if it requires more restrictive soil management options.

3.2 Soil Excavation and Handling

Every effort will be made during construction to reuse excavated soil material and minimize off-site disposal of soil. In order to maximize the reuse of soil materials, topsoil should be separated from the underlying fill material during excavation and efforts should be made to avoid mixing of the clean soil material with poorer quality fill material. The topsoil layer was observed to be relatively thin (approximately 0.1 m) in TP16-09, which is located along the eastern edge of the study area, closest to the fill mound, therefore additional effort may be required to accurately sort soil units in this area.

June 2, 2016 6

Page 10: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

It is also important to understand that the risk assessment completed by Geofirma (2016b) effectively permits all soil at the Mooney's Bay site to remain it its current state. In other words, the fill material can remain at depth provided it is covered by a sufficient clean soil cap to eliminate an exposure pathway not considered as part of the risk assessment. Therefore, the fill material can be placed back into an excavation that will remain at depth but it cannot be reused as surficial soil.

3.2.1 Temporary Soil Management

To permit reuse of site topsoil, soil stockpiling will be required during excavation activities. The location of temporary soil stockpile areas cannot be within 30 m of the Rideau River. Topsoil should be stockpiled for potential reuse as required, while fill material should be segregated for disposal at a licensed landfill facility or alternate receiving site. Based on the proposed excavation depths (approximately 0.2 m), the majority of soil material encountered will be topsoil.

A temporary (intermediate) storage facility will not be required for the duration of this project. There is adequate space on-site for temporary soil stockpiling at the site (at a distance greater than 30 m from the Rideau River).

3.2.2 Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analysis

If stockpiled topsoil is to be reused at the site, additional representative soil samples should be collected and analyzed for metals and PAH parameters to confirm that the material satisfies applicable site criteria (MOECC Table 9 and CCME SQG). No additional sampling is required for fill material requiring off-site disposal at a MOECC licensed landfill facility; however, results of the leachate analysis will be required by the receiving facility prior to disposal.

3.2.3 Forms and Documentation for Transportation Off-Site

Each haulage to the off-site receiving facilities will be documented, and include: date and time, truck ID, soil analyses, weigh bill and any additional information deemed relevant by the site representative.

3.3 Risk Management

Contaminants of potential concern for the site included carcinogenic PAHs in surficial soils and lead and carcinogenic PAHs is subsurface soils. A preliminary human health and ecological risk assessment (HHERA) has been completed for the site and identified no risk to Park Visitors/Users or Park Maintenance Workers posed by surficial soil, and a minor potential health risk to Park Utility/Construction Workers posed by direct soil contact to carcinogenic PAHs is subsurface soil (Geofirma Engineering Ltd., 2016b). Lead was determined to not pose health risks to Park Utility/Construction Workers. Furthermore, the report concluded that that soil quality does not pose an unacceptable ecological health risk to terrestrial mammals, birds, plants and soil organisms at the site or to aquatic life in the adjacent Rideau River.

To reduce the exposure and estimated risk to Park Utility/Construction Workers from soil PAHs, routine protection measures such as avoidance of soil ingestion and skin contact should be implemented during construction activities. This will be accomplished through appropriate work and hygiene practices and proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure. PPE

June 2, 2016 7

Page 11: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

may include, but is not limited to, the following: safety boots, long pants and long sleeve shirts, safety glasses and chemical resistant gloves.

3.4 Hazardous Materials

No hazardous waste material has been identified within the contract limits. The testing results (“COMP1”) satisfy applicable leachate standards (Schedule IV of O. Reg. 558/00), confirming that no hazardous material are present on-site. If any fill material is encountered that differs from the soil types identified in Section 3, additional samples for leachate testing may be required prior to landfill disposal.

3.5 Additional Considerations

In addition to this Soil Management Plan, the construction contractor will need to have other procedures or plans in place that should include, but are not limited to:

• Health and Safety Plan;

• Testing program for imported fill to ensure it meets MOECC Table 1 Standards;

• Soil excavation and stockpiling plan to outline where they will stockpile and how they will secure this area (e.g. fences to keep public safe, tarps on top of soil to reduce leaching or soil washouts, etc) with specific considerations for the Mooney's Bay site pertaining to the proximity to the Rideau River and an active park with lots of visitors;

• Soil sampling plan and screening requirements for soil re-use onsite; and,

• Contingency plan to deal with any unexpected soil impacts.

June 2, 2016 8

Page 12: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

4 POTENTIAL RECEIVING SITES FOR EXCESS SOIL

For soil that is not suitable for reuse on-site, the off-site disposal sites listed below have been identified. Effort should be made to reuse fill material that satisfies applicable site standards as the requirements for off-site disposal are more challenging and additional costs are incurred. It is anticipated that only the topsoil is of sufficient quality for reuse. Native glacial till material is suitable for disposal as clean (inert) fill material, however based on the proposed depth of excavation till is not likely to be encountered during construction.

No applicable receiving site (alternate City of Ottawa project or non-City owned land) has been identified for disposal of excess soil material for this project. Should a site become available during excavation then effort will be made to divert material to the receiving site(s).

4.1 Off-Site Disposal

4.1.1 Trail Road Landfill

Excess material exceeding MOECC Table 9 Standards requires off-site landfill disposal. Since no receiving site has been identified for excess material exceeding Table 1 Standards, this material will also require landfill disposal.

The Trail Road Landfill site has been identified as the primary receiver for excess soil material that does not meet applicable site standards. For the purposes of this excavation, all excess fill material will require disposal at the Trail Road Landfill site. The facility is located at 4475 Trail Road, off of Moodie Drive, near Fallowfield Road.

4.1.2 Local Quarries

Excess soil material that satisfies MOECC Table 1 criteria is considered clean (inert) material and can be transported to a local quarry operator that will accept the material for the purpose of filling an expired quarry excavation. This scenario could include topsoil or native soil material (till), which been identified at the site, although at depths greater than the proposed excavation depth for this project.

June 2, 2016 9

Page 13: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

5 REFERENCES

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), 1999. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, Winnipeg, Updates to 2016.

Geofirma Engineering Ltd., 2016a. Soil Investigation and Characterization Mooney’s Bay Park, Ottawa, Ontario, Report prepared for City of Ottawa, June.

Geofirma Engineering Ltd., 2016b. Preliminary Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park, Ottawa, Ontario, Report prepared for City of Ottawa, June.

MOECC, Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, 2014. Management of Excess Soil – A Guide for Best Management Practices, prepared by the Central Region Operations Division, January.

MOE, Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, 2011. Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act.

June 2, 2016 10

Page 14: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Soil Management Plan Final Report Park Redevelopment, Part of Mooney’s Bay Park Doc. ID: 15-200-8_Soil Management_Plan_R0

6 CLOSURE

We trust this report satisfies your current requirements. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned.

Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Steve Gaines, P.Eng, P.Geo, QPESA Sean Sterling, P.Eng, PGeo, QPESA Geological Engineer Senior Hydrogeologist

June 2, 2016 11

Page 15: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

APPENDIX A

Figures

Figure 1 – Site Location

Figure 2 – Site Layout and Test Pit Locations

Page 16: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250M e te rs

1:40,096Sc ale

³

PROJECT No. 15-200-8

DESIGN: ADGCAD/GIS: ADGCHECK: KGRREV : 0

Figure 1Location of

Mooney's Bay Study Area

PROJECTM anage m e nt Plan,

M oone y’s Bay Park Re d e ve lope m e nt

G:\Data\Project\MooneysBay\Maps\15-200-8_MooneysBay\15-200-8-MooneysBay_Figure1_SiteLocation.mxd

DATE: 02/06/2016

LEGENDM oone y's Bay Study Are a

Coord inate Sys te m : NAD 1983 M TM 9Sourc e : City of Ottawa ge oOttawa 2007 air photo

TOWN OF MISSISSIPPI

MILLS

TOWNSHIP OF

MONTAGUE

CITY OF CLARENCE-ROCKLAND

TOWNSHIP OF

DRUMMOND/NORTH ELMSLEY

MUNICIPALITY OF NORTH GRENVILLE

TOWNSHIP OF EDWARDSBURGH/

CARDINAL

VILLAGE OF MERRICKVILLE-

WOLFORDTOWNSHIP OF

ELIZABETHTOWN-KITLEY

^CITY OF OTTAWA

TOWNSHIP OF TAY VALLEY

TOWNSHIP OF NORTH DUNDAS

MUNICIPALITY OF SOUTH DUNDAS

TOWNSHIP OF LANARK

HIGHLANDSTOWNSHIP

OF BECKWITH

TOWNSHIP OF

RUSSELL

Ontario

Quebec

0 20 4010 Km

INDEX M AP

Se rvic e Laye r Cre d its : Sourc e s : Es ri, HERE, De Lorm e ,Inte rm ap, inc re m e nt P Corp., GEBCO, U SGS, FAO, NPS,NRCAN, Ge oBas e , IGN, Kadaste r NL, Ord nanc e Surve y,Es ri Japan, M ETI, Es ri China (Hong Kong), swis stopo,M apm yInd ia, © Ope nStre e tM ap c ontributors , and the GISU s e r Com m unity

Page 17: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

ED

ED

ED

ED

ED

ED

ED ED

ED

ED

ED

ED

EDED

ED

ED

ED

ED

ED

TP 16-11

TP 16-12

TP 16-15

TP 16-14

TP 16-13

TP 16-16

TP 16-05 TP 16-18

TP 16-19

TP 16-06

TP 16-17

TP 16-04

TP 16-03 TP 16-02TP 16-01

TP 16-07

TP 16-09

TP 16-10

TP 16-08

0 30 6015Meters

1:1,191Sca le

³

P ROJECT No. 15-200-8

DESIGN: NMPCAD/GIS: NMPCHECK: SNGREV: 0

Figure 2Site Layout (Current Air Photo)

P ROJECT Ma na g em ent P la nMooney’s Ba y P a rk Redev elopem ent

G:\Data\Project\MooneysBay\Maps\15-200-8_MooneysBay\15-200-8-MooneysBay_Figure2_SiteLayout.mxd

DATE: 02/06/2016

LEGENDED Test P it

Mooney's Ba y Study AreaApproxim a te Loca tion ofHistorica l P ond

Coordina te System: NAD 1983 MTM 9Serv ice La yer Credits: Source: Esri, Dig ita lGlobe, GeoEye,Ea rth sta r Geog ra ph ics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AEX, Getm a pping , Aerog rid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, a nd th eGIS User Com m unity

Page 18: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

APPENDIX B

Site Preparation and Grading Plan

Page 19: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

SCALE 1 : 750

BENCH MARKEX. MH 76.00INV. 74.80

+(76.45)

+(76.05)+(75.60)

DITCH

MAY 16 2016

ISSUED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVALNOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION

SITE PREPARATION & GRADING

GENERAL NOTES:CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE GRADING AND LAYOUTBY SURVEYOR LICENSED IN ONTARIORECEIVE APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIORTO STARTING EXCAVATION

CONSTRUCTION SCOPE:PROVIDE SECURE MODULOK FENCE AROUNDPROJECT LIMIT. INSTALL TURTLE EXCLUSION FENCEINSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE AS PER CITY OFOTTAWA STANDARDS.GRUB ROOTS AND STUMPS, REMOVE FROM SITESTRIP AND REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL.INSTALL 600 LONG T-POSTS TO MARK ENDS OF TILERUNS AND CORNERS OF GIVER CURB WALL LOCATION.SET MARKERS 50mm BELOW GRADE. PROVIDE LOCATION/RECORD DRAWING (DIGITAL FILE)

PT. 1 (1200 OFFSET FROMCURB)FINISH GRADE 77.00TOP OF CLEAR 76.70TOP OF B 76.55TILE INVERT 76.45GEOGRID 76.35EXISTING (76.40)SUBGRADE 76.20

PT. 2 (1200 OFFSET FROM CURB)FINISH GRADE 77.00TOP OF CLEAR 76.70TOP OF B 76.55TILE INVERT 76.25GEOGRID 76.35EXISTING (76.25)SUBGRADE 76.05

PT.3 (1200 OFFSET FROM CURB)FINISH GRADE 76.70TOP OF CLEAR 76.40TOP OF B 76.25TILE INVERT 75.90GEOGRID 75.90EXISTING (76.00)SUBGRADE 75.80

PT.4 (1200 OFFSET FROM CURB)FINISH GRADE 76.50TOP OF CLEAR 76.20TOP OF B 76.05TILE INVERT 76.00GEOGRID 75.75EXISTING (75.75)SUBGRADE 75.55

HEADER- 150 DIA. NON-PERFORATED TILE

DRAIN TILE- 100 DIA. PERFORATED TILE WITH SOCK

STORM SEWER- 200 DIA. SDR SEWER PIPE

CATCH BASIN- HDPE YEAR YARD

LINE OF CURB/ WALL (AS PER GIVER APPROVED LAYOUT)

EXTENT OF GRANULAR FOUNDATION (600 OFFSET FROM

CURB WALL)

GRADING TRANSITION/ SLOPE TO EXISTING MAX 4:1

PROPOSED ELEVATION

EXISTING ELEVATION

TREE REMOVED BY OTHERS OR TRANSPLANTED- GRUB OUT

STUMPS, ROOTS AND FILL HOLES W. CLEAN FILL

77.00

(76.55)

CBTG 75.75INV. 75.20

+(76.75)

+(76.50)

+(76.80)

+(76.70)

CURB BY OTHERSNOTE: INSTALL70mm WOOD FIBRE(TO BE COMPLETEDBY OTHERS TO GRADESSHOWN AND TO 300DEPTH)

300 ENG. WOOD FIBRE

FILTER CLOTH150 CLEAR STONE

DRAIN TILE (ELEVATION VARIES)

350-500 GRAN. B (SEE GRADING)

GEO GRID )MIN 150 FROM SUBGRADE

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

CROSS SECTION (REFER TO POINTS 1-4 ON PLAN)

Page 20: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

APPENDIX C

Complete Laboratory Analytical Results

(from Geofirma Engineering Ltd., 2016a)

Page 21: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

www.paracellabs.com1-800-749-1947

Ottawa, ON, K1G 4J8300 - 2319 St. Laurent Blvd

Attn: Sean SterlingOttawa, ON K1R 1A2Suite 200, 1 Raymond St.Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Certificate of Analysis

This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted:

Paracel ID Client ID

Order #: 1617125Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016 Client PO:

Custody: 28885 Project: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

1617125-01 TP16-01-11617125-02 TP16-01-31617125-03 TP16-02-11617125-04 TP16-02-31617125-05 TP16-03-11617125-06 TP16-03-21617125-07 TP16-04-11617125-08 TP16-04-31617125-09 TP16-05-11617125-10 TP16-05-31617125-11 TP16-06-11617125-12 TP16-06-31617125-13 TP16-07-11617125-14 TP16-07-31617125-15 TP16-08-11617125-16 TP16-08-21617125-17 TP16-09-11617125-18 TP16-09-21617125-19 TP16-10-11617125-20 TP16-10-3

Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising, shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under any circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work.

Lab SupervisorMark Foto, M.Sc.

Approved By:

Page 1 of 17

Page 22: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Analysis Summary TableAnalysis Method Reference/Description Extraction Date Analysis Date

MOE (HWE), EPA 200.7 - ICP-OES 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16Boron, availableEPA 8260 - P&T GC-MS 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16BTEX by P&T GC-MSMOE E3056 - Extraction, colourimetric 19-Apr-16 20-Apr-16Chromium, hexavalent - soilEPA 7471B - CVAA, digestion 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16Mercury by CVAACWS Tier 1 - P&T GC-FID 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16PHC F1CWS Tier 1 - Extraction Gravimetric 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16PHC F4G (gravimetric)CWS Tier 1 - GC-FID, extraction 19-Apr-16 19-Apr-16PHCs F2 to F4based on MOE E3470, ICP-OES 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16REG 153: Metals by ICP/OES, soilEPA 8270 - GC-MS, extraction 19-Apr-16 19-Apr-16REG 153: PAHs by GC-MSGravimetric, calculation 19-Apr-16 19-Apr-16Solids, %

Page 2 of 17

Page 23: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-01-1 TP16-01-3 TP16-02-1 TP16-02-3Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-01 1617125-02 1617125-03 1617125-04Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 80.587.387.886.50.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 5.4<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Barium 14280.212683.91.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron 5.14.66.25.61.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available <0.5<0.50.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 25.521.528.519.81.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2<0.2<0.2<0.20.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 6.45.67.35.81.0 ug/g dry

Copper 18.911.412.817.21.0 ug/g dry

Lead 12112.212.415.11.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 16.311.015.412.41.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 29.229.833.327.31.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 89.734.750.634.11.0 ug/g dry

VolatilesBenzene --<0.02-0.02 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene-d8 Surrogate - 105% - -HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) --<7-7 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) --<4-4 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) --<8-8 ug/g dry

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) --<6-6 ug/g dry

Page 3 of 17

Page 24: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-01-1 TP16-01-3 TP16-02-1 TP16-02-3Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-01 1617125-02 1617125-03 1617125-04Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene 1.39<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene 0.17<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 3.42<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene 2.16<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene 2.04<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene 1.87<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.96<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene 1.59<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene 2.20<0.02<0.020.030.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.31<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 7.840.04<0.020.040.02 ug/g dry

Fluorene 2.62<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.94<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene 1.08<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene 1.59<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) 2.67<0.04<0.04<0.040.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene 2.86<0.01<0.01<0.010.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 11.9<0.02<0.020.020.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 5.970.03<0.020.040.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 70.7% 66.4% 82.6% 71.5%Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 91.9% 89.0% 96.1% 83.0%

Page 4 of 17

Page 25: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-03-1 TP16-03-2 TP16-04-1 TP16-04-3Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-05 1617125-06 1617125-07 1617125-08Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 79.085.585.885.90.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 2.6<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Barium 68.295.299.998.11.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron 6.76.57.57.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available 1.0<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium 0.7<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 27.926.820.420.71.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2<0.2<0.2<0.20.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 4.77.16.25.91.0 ug/g dry

Copper 95.719.210.410.51.0 ug/g dry

Lead 45019.29.49.21.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum 2.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 14.515.612.111.81.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 21.635.829.029.81.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 18745.430.933.01.0 ug/g dry

VolatilesBenzene <0.02---0.02 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene <0.05---0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene <0.05---0.05 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes <0.05---0.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene <0.05---0.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total <0.05---0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene-d8 Surrogate 104%---HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) <7---7 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) <4---4 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 577---8 ug/g dry

Page 5 of 17

Page 26: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-03-1 TP16-03-2 TP16-04-1 TP16-04-3Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-05 1617125-06 1617125-07 1617125-08Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) 603 [2]---6 ug/g dry

F4G PHCs (gravimetric) 861---50 ug/g dry

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene 0.12<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 0.21<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene 0.33<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene 0.37<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.39<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.18<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.26<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene 0.38<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.06<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 1.300.05<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Fluorene 0.15<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.20<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene 0.21<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.24<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) 0.45<0.04<0.04<0.040.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene 0.16<0.01<0.01<0.010.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 0.99<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 0.980.04<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 67.6%54.4%58.1%57.5%

Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 82.0%75.8%87.6%78.6%

Page 6 of 17

Page 27: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-05-1 TP16-05-3 TP16-06-1 TP16-06-3Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-09 1617125-10 1617125-11 1617125-12Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 81.385.184.482.50.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 2.31.72.82.91.0 ug/g dry

Barium 1411141031141.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron 6.47.610.39.51.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available 0.5<0.50.50.50.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 31.028.720.722.91.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2<0.2<0.2<0.20.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 8.37.57.47.51.0 ug/g dry

Copper 65.727.038.432.81.0 ug/g dry

Lead 84.723.232.940.21.0 ug/g dry

Mercury 0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 17.215.617.717.21.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 40.935.929.931.51.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 94.355.561.556.81.0 ug/g dry

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene <0.02<0.020.030.050.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 0.040.030.030.080.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene 0.080.050.040.130.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene 0.100.060.080.180.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.100.070.090.160.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.060.040.060.100.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.090.070.070.190.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene 0.110.070.070.170.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene <0.02<0.02<0.020.030.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 0.230.160.130.410.02 ug/g dry

Page 7 of 17

Page 28: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-05-1 TP16-05-3 TP16-06-1 TP16-06-3Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-09 1617125-10 1617125-11 1617125-12Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Fluorene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.040.030.040.100.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) <0.04<0.04<0.04<0.040.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene <0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 0.170.060.070.230.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 0.190.130.110.330.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl 69.0% 65.7% 66.5% 64.6%Surrogate

Terphenyl-d14 80.4% 85.1% 71.8% 81.8%Surrogate

Page 8 of 17

Page 29: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-07-1 TP16-07-3 TP16-08-1 TP16-08-2Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-13 1617125-14 1617125-15 1617125-16Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 83.6 88.1 76.3 84.60.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic <1.0 7.4 2.1 7.91.0 ug/g dry

Barium 195 117 122 1131.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron 6.1 8.8 5.6 9.91.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 48.9 19.0 34.4 19.61.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 10.2 6.5 8.0 6.51.0 ug/g dry

Copper 36.1 68.8 19.2 68.21.0 ug/g dry

Lead 28.4 45.9 22.7 45.41.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 27.3 13.6 18.2 14.21.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 53.5 27.5 41.3 28.31.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 76.5 90.2 57.1 89.01.0 ug/g dry

VolatilesBenzene - <0.02 - -0.02 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene - <0.05 - -0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene - <0.05 - -0.05 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes - <0.05 - -0.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene - <0.05 - -0.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total - <0.05 - -0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene-d8 Surrogate - 103% - -HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) - <7 - -7 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) - <4 - -4 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) - 225 - -8 ug/g dry

Page 9 of 17

Page 30: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-07-1 TP16-07-3 TP16-08-1 TP16-08-2Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-13 1617125-14 1617125-15 1617125-16Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) - 465 [2] - -6 ug/g dry

F4G PHCs (gravimetric) - 352 - -50 ug/g dry

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene <0.02 0.04 <0.02 <0.020.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.020.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 0.03 0.19 <0.02 <0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene <0.02 0.47 0.02 0.040.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene <0.02 0.65 0.03 0.060.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene <0.02 0.70 0.04 0.070.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene <0.02 0.46 0.02 0.060.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene <0.02 0.71 0.04 0.080.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene <0.02 0.70 0.04 0.060.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene <0.02 0.13 <0.02 <0.020.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 0.05 2.00 0.08 0.110.02 ug/g dry

Fluorene <0.02 0.06 <0.02 <0.020.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene <0.02 0.41 <0.02 0.040.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.02 0.05 <0.02 <0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.02 0.04 <0.02 <0.020.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) <0.04 0.09 <0.04 <0.040.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene <0.01 0.02 <0.01 <0.010.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 0.03 0.88 0.05 0.050.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 0.04 1.50 0.06 0.090.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 65.7% 68.6% 62.8% 65.5%

Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 87.0% 90.4% 83.2% 78.3%

Page 10 of 17

Page 31: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-09-1 TP16-09-2 TP16-10-1 TP16-10-3Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-17 1617125-18 1617125-19 1617125-20Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 74.6 76.8 78.6 78.10.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0 3.3 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 2.1 3.4 1.1 2.41.0 ug/g dry

Barium 181 138 83.4 2221.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron 7.2 6.4 7.0 5.41.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.50.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 45.0 27.0 24.0 64.51.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.20.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 10.6 7.5 6.0 14.81.0 ug/g dry

Copper 42.4 105 15.2 38.31.0 ug/g dry

Lead 29.3 66.6 12.9 25.41.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 24.6 17.1 13.1 36.11.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 50.5 35.2 32.1 65.51.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 68.5 93.1 40.0 81.31.0 ug/g dry

VolatilesBenzene - - - <0.020.02 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene - - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

Toluene - - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes - - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene - - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total - - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

Toluene-d8 Surrogate - - - 103%HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) - - - <77 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) - - - 3264 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) - - - 5728 ug/g dry

Page 11 of 17

Page 32: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-09-1 TP16-09-2 TP16-10-1 TP16-10-3Sample Date: 18-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-1618-Apr-16

1617125-17 1617125-18 1617125-19 1617125-20Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) - - - 751 [2]6 ug/g dry

F4G PHCs (gravimetric) - - - 84550 ug/g dry

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene 0.20 0.02 <0.02 0.120.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 0.050.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 0.47 0.07 <0.02 0.220.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene 0.58 0.11 <0.02 0.360.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene 0.55 0.14 <0.02 0.480.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.49 0.12 <0.02 0.400.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.25 0.10 <0.02 0.270.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.62 0.17 <0.02 0.560.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene 0.65 0.15 <0.02 0.510.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.08 0.02 <0.02 0.040.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 2.03 0.38 0.05 1.380.02 ug/g dry

Fluorene 0.16 0.02 <0.02 0.240.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.25 0.08 <0.02 0.270.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene 0.03 <0.02 <0.02 1.520.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.04 <0.02 <0.02 0.370.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) 0.07 <0.04 <0.04 1.880.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene 0.05 0.02 <0.01 0.080.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 1.65 0.25 0.02 1.090.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 1.56 0.30 0.04 1.120.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 60.4% 84.1% 87.2% 75.1%

Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 79.4% 100% 104% 90.8%

Page 12 of 17

Page 33: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Blank

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit UnitsSourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/gF2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 4 ug/gF3 PHCs (C16-C34) ND 8 ug/gF4 PHCs (C34-C50) ND 6 ug/gF4G PHCs (gravimetric) ND 50 ug/g

MetalsAntimony ND 1.0 ug/gArsenic ND 1.0 ug/gBarium ND 1.0 ug/gBeryllium ND 1.0 ug/gBoron, available ND 0.5 ug/gBoron ND 1.0 ug/gCadmium ND 0.5 ug/gChromium (VI) ND 0.2 ug/gChromium ND 1.0 ug/gCobalt ND 1.0 ug/gCopper ND 1.0 ug/gLead ND 1.0 ug/gMercury ND 0.1 ug/gMolybdenum ND 1.0 ug/gNickel ND 1.0 ug/gSelenium ND 1.0 ug/gSilver ND 0.5 ug/gThallium ND 1.0 ug/gUranium ND 1.0 ug/gVanadium ND 1.0 ug/gZinc ND 1.0 ug/g

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene ND 0.02 ug/gAcenaphthylene ND 0.02 ug/gAnthracene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [a] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [a] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [b] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [g,h,i] perylene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [k] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gChrysene ND 0.02 ug/gDibenzo [a,h] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/gFluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gFluorene ND 0.02 ug/gIndeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/gMethylnaphthalene (1&2) ND 0.04 ug/gNaphthalene ND 0.01 ug/gPhenanthrene ND 0.02 ug/gPyrene ND 0.02 ug/gSurrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.911 68.3 50-140ug/gSurrogate: Terphenyl-d14 1.23 92.0 50-140ug/g

VolatilesBenzene ND 0.02 ug/gEthylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/gToluene ND 0.05 ug/gm,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/go-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/gXylenes, total ND 0.05 ug/gSurrogate: Toluene-d8 8.26 103 50-140ug/g

Page 13 of 17

Page 34: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Duplicate

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit UnitsSourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/g dry ND 40F2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 4 ug/g dry ND 30F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 165 8 ug/g dry 162 301.6F4 PHCs (C34-C50) 642 6 ug/g dry 493 30 ORG0126.2

MetalsAntimony ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Arsenic ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 30Barium 86.3 1.0 ug/g dry 83.9 302.8Beryllium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Boron, available 0.59 0.5 ug/g dry 0.50 3517.1Boron 5.84 1.0 ug/g dry 5.62 303.8Cadmium ND 0.5 ug/g dry ND 300.0Chromium (VI) ND 0.2 ug/g dry ND 35Chromium 20.0 1.0 ug/g dry 19.8 300.9Cobalt 5.75 1.0 ug/g dry 5.78 300.5Copper 17.9 1.0 ug/g dry 17.2 303.8Lead 15.4 1.0 ug/g dry 15.1 301.9Mercury ND 0.1 ug/g dry ND 300.0Molybdenum ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Nickel 12.3 1.0 ug/g dry 12.4 300.7Selenium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Silver ND 0.5 ug/g dry ND 300.0Thallium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Uranium 1.93 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Vanadium 28.5 1.0 ug/g dry 27.3 304.3Zinc 33.9 1.0 ug/g dry 34.1 300.6

Physical Characteristics% Solids 77.2 0.1 % by Wt. 72.7 256.0

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Acenaphthylene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Anthracene 0.021 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Benzo [a] anthracene 0.053 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Benzo [a] pyrene 0.064 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.055 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.038 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.049 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Chrysene 0.060 0.02 ug/g dry 0.027 40 QR-0177.1Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Fluoranthene 0.145 0.02 ug/g dry 0.045 40 QR-01106.0Fluorene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.035 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.01-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 402-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Naphthalene ND 0.01 ug/g dry ND 400.0Phenanthrene 0.062 0.02 ug/g dry 0.023 40 QR-0191.6Pyrene 0.119 0.02 ug/g dry 0.037 40 QR-01105.0Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 1.19 ug/g dry 77.1 50-140NDSurrogate: Terphenyl-d14 1.38 ug/g dry 89.3 50-140ND

VolatilesBenzene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 50Ethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Toluene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50m,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50o-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Surrogate: Toluene-d8 4.97 ug/g dry 104 50-140ND

Page 14 of 17

Page 35: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Spike

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit Units SourceResult %REC %REC

Limit RPDRPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) 189 ND 94.4 80-1207 ug/gF2 PHCs (C10-C16) 74 ND 82.6 80-1204 ug/gF3 PHCs (C16-C34) 155 ND 83.3 80-1208 ug/gF4 PHCs (C34-C50) 110 ND 88.7 80-1206 ug/gF4G PHCs (gravimetric) 940 ND 94.0 80-12050 ug/g

MetalsAntimony 244 4.75 95.7 70-130ug/LArsenic 264 ND 106 70-130ug/LBarium 1880 1680 81.0 70-130ug/LBeryllium 236 1.61 93.8 70-130ug/LBoron, available 3.45 0.50 59.0 70-122 QM-070.5 ug/gBoron 353 112 96.1 70-130ug/LCadmium 230 2.12 91.3 70-130ug/LChromium (VI) 4.4 ND 88.0 70-1300.2 ug/gChromium 604 396 83.4 70-130ug/LCobalt 322 116 82.4 70-130ug/LCopper 580 344 94.6 70-130ug/LLead 510 302 83.2 70-130ug/LMercury 1.43 ND 95.5 70-1300.1 ug/gMolybdenum 224 9.50 85.9 70-130ug/LNickel 445 247 79.4 70-130ug/LSelenium 208 0.93 82.6 70-130ug/LSilver 209 7.00 81.0 70-130ug/LThallium 194 7.16 74.7 70-130ug/LUranium 287 ND 115 70-130ug/LVanadium 765 547 87.5 70-130ug/LZinc 857 682 70.2 70-130ug/L

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene 0.163 ND 84.6 50-1400.02 ug/gAcenaphthylene 0.143 ND 74.4 50-1400.02 ug/gAnthracene 0.183 ND 94.7 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [a] anthracene 0.169 ND 87.8 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [a] pyrene 0.194 ND 101 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [b] fluoranthene 0.203 ND 105 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.204 ND 106 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [k] fluoranthene 0.224 ND 116 50-1400.02 ug/gChrysene 0.212 0.027 95.9 50-1400.02 ug/gDibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.168 ND 87.1 50-1400.02 ug/gFluoranthene 0.268 0.045 116 50-1400.02 ug/gFluorene 0.146 ND 75.9 50-1400.02 ug/gIndeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.189 ND 98.2 50-1400.02 ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene 0.192 ND 99.6 50-1400.02 ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene 0.197 ND 102 50-1400.02 ug/gNaphthalene 0.165 ND 85.7 50-1400.01 ug/gPhenanthrene 0.210 0.023 96.8 50-1400.02 ug/gPyrene 0.250 0.037 111 50-1400.02 ug/gSurrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 1.20 77.6 50-140ug/g

VolatilesBenzene 4.03 ND 101 60-1300.02 ug/gEthylbenzene 3.23 ND 80.8 60-1300.05 ug/gToluene 3.39 ND 84.6 60-1300.05 ug/g

Page 15 of 17

Page 36: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Spike

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit Units SourceResult %REC %REC

Limit RPDRPDLimit Notes

m,p-Xylenes 6.99 ND 87.4 60-1300.05 ug/go-Xylene 3.28 ND 82.1 60-1300.05 ug/g

Page 16 of 17

Page 37: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617125

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Apr-2016Order Date: 18-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

 Qualifier Notes :

Login Qualifiers :

Container(s) - Bottle and COC sample ID don't match - Use ID on coc per Client. Applies to samples:  TP16‐08‐2

Sample Qualifiers :

GC-FID signal did not return to baseline by C50 :2

 QC Qualifiers :

GC-FID signal did not return to baseline by C50ORG01 :

The spike recovery was outside acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD. The batch was accepted based on other acceptable QC.

QM-07 :

Duplicate RPD is high, however, the sample result is less than 10x the MDL.QR-01 :

 Sample Data RevisionsNone

 Work Order Revisions  /  Comments :

None

 Other Report Notes :

MDL: Method Detection Limit

n/a: not applicable

Source Result: Data used as source for matrix and duplicate samples%REC: Percent recovery.RPD: Relative percent difference.

ND: Not Detected

Soil results are reported on a dry weight basis when the units are denoted with 'dry'.Where %Solids is reported, moisture loss includes the loss of volatile hydrocarbons.

CCME PHC additional information:

- The method for the analysis of PHCs complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory. All prescribed quality criteria identified in the method has been met.- F1 range corrected for BTEX.- F2 to F3 ranges corrected for appropriate PAHs where available.

- In the case where F4 and F4G are both reported, the greater of the two results is to be used for comparison to CWS PHC criteria.- The gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons (F4G) are not to be added to C6 to C50 hydrocarbons.

Page 17 of 17

Page 38: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site
Page 39: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site
Page 40: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

www.paracellabs.com1-800-749-1947

Ottawa, ON, K1G 4J8300 - 2319 St. Laurent Blvd

Attn: Sean SterlingOttawa, ON K1R 1A2Suite 200, 1 Raymond St.Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Certificate of Analysis

This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted:

Paracel ID Client ID

Order #: 1617252Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016 Client PO:

Custody: 28887 Project: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

1617252-01 TP16-11-11617252-02 TP16-11-21617252-03 TP16-12-11617252-04 TP16-12-31617252-05 TP16-13-11617252-06 TP16-13-21617252-07 TP16-14-11617252-08 TP16-14-31617252-09 TP16-15-11617252-10 TP16-15-21617252-11 TP16-16-11617252-12 TP16-17-11617252-13 TP16-18-11617252-14 TPD11617252-15 TPD21617252-16 TP16-17-21617252-17 TP16-19-1

Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising, shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under any circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work.

Lab SupervisorMark Foto, M.Sc.

Approved By:

Page 1 of 17

Page 41: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Analysis Summary TableAnalysis Method Reference/Description Extraction Date Analysis Date

MOE (HWE), EPA 200.7 - ICP-OES 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16Boron, availableEPA 8260 - P&T GC-MS 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16BTEX by P&T GC-MSMOE E3056 - Extraction, colourimetric 20-Apr-16 21-Apr-16Chromium, hexavalent - soilEPA 7471B - CVAA, digestion 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16Mercury by CVAACWS Tier 1 - P&T GC-FID 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16PHC F1CWS Tier 1 - GC-FID, extraction 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16PHCs F2 to F4based on MOE E3470, ICP-OES 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16REG 153: Metals by ICP/OES, soilEPA 8270 - GC-MS, extraction 20-Apr-16 20-Apr-16REG 153: PAHs by GC-MSGravimetric, calculation 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16Solids, %

Page 2 of 17

Page 42: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-11-1 TP16-11-2 TP16-12-1 TP16-12-3Sample Date: 19-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-16

1617252-01 1617252-02 1617252-03 1617252-04Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 73.382.259.684.30.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 3.52.11.72.51.0 ug/g dry

Barium 2041061881061.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron 5.46.78.69.41.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available <0.50.51.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 58.728.142.227.31.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2<0.2<0.2<0.20.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 13.67.28.07.71.0 ug/g dry

Copper 53.118.731.518.41.0 ug/g dry

Lead 89.528.618.519.61.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 32.116.018.416.91.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 61.734.434.034.11.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 12359.470.249.61.0 ug/g dry

VolatilesBenzene --<0.02-0.02 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene-d8 Surrogate - 106% - -HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) --<7-7 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) --<4-4 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) --<8-8 ug/g dry

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) --<6-6 ug/g dry

Page 3 of 17

Page 43: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-11-1 TP16-11-2 TP16-12-1 TP16-12-3Sample Date: 19-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-16

1617252-01 1617252-02 1617252-03 1617252-04Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene 0.05<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 0.06<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene 0.060.03<0.020.030.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene 0.080.03<0.020.040.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.090.03<0.020.030.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.060.03<0.020.030.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.050.02<0.020.040.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene 0.110.04<0.020.040.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 0.340.07<0.020.080.02 ug/g dry

Fluorene 0.05<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.050.02<0.020.020.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) <0.04<0.04<0.04<0.040.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene <0.01<0.01<0.01<0.010.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 0.180.04<0.020.050.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 0.250.06<0.020.060.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 68.6% 70.3% 56.0% 55.4%Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 94.4% 95.6% 92.3% 87.6%

Page 4 of 17

Page 44: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-13-1 TP16-13-2 TP16-14-1 TP16-14-3Sample Date: 19-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-16

1617252-05 1617252-06 1617252-07 1617252-08Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 88.584.977.674.60.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 1.83.24.82.61.0 ug/g dry

Barium 97.111035987.91.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron 6.411.39.29.91.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available <0.5<0.50.61.00.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 19.225.925.522.31.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2<0.2<0.2<0.20.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 6.57.77.16.01.0 ug/g dry

Copper 12.414.322.526.51.0 ug/g dry

Lead 9.318.655.421.61.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1<0.10.1<0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 12.615.815.312.61.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 29.533.934.525.11.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 29.451.517484.01.0 ug/g dry

VolatilesBenzene --<0.02-0.02 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total --<0.05-0.05 ug/g dry

Toluene-d8 Surrogate --105%-HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) --<7-7 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) --<4-4 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) --33-8 ug/g dry

Page 5 of 17

Page 45: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-13-1 TP16-13-2 TP16-14-1 TP16-14-3Sample Date: 19-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-16

1617252-05 1617252-06 1617252-07 1617252-08Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) --<6-6 ug/g dry

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene <0.02<0.02<0.020.070.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene <0.02<0.02<0.020.120.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene <0.02<0.02<0.020.180.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene <0.02<0.02<0.020.220.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene <0.02<0.02<0.020.140.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene <0.02<0.02<0.020.150.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene <0.02<0.02<0.020.170.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene <0.02<0.02<0.020.030.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene <0.02<0.02<0.020.330.02 ug/g dry

Fluorene <0.02<0.02<0.020.050.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene <0.02<0.02<0.020.140.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.02<0.02<0.02<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) <0.04<0.04<0.04<0.040.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene <0.01<0.01<0.010.050.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene <0.02<0.02<0.020.290.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene <0.02<0.02<0.020.240.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 56.1%72.6%55.1%52.0%

Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 89.2%98.6%92.0%78.4%

Page 6 of 17

Page 46: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-15-1 TP16-15-2 TP16-16-1 TP16-17-1Sample Date: 19-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-16

1617252-09 1617252-10 1617252-11 1617252-12Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 85.990.187.286.80.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 2.04.52.21.21.0 ug/g dry

Barium 99.590.987.796.61.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Boron 4.59.44.75.61.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 25.518.520.421.41.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2<0.2<0.2<0.20.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 7.39.75.96.21.0 ug/g dry

Copper 23.926.818.921.11.0 ug/g dry

Lead 28.634.356.020.91.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1<0.1<0.1<0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum <1.01.8<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 15.322.012.813.51.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5<0.5<0.5<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.01.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 32.128.728.630.91.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 47.347.356.243.81.0 ug/g dry

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene <0.02<0.020.48<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene 0.090.100.06<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 0.090.061.430.040.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene 0.080.081.960.070.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene 0.110.151.790.090.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.100.141.630.090.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.100.140.820.060.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.100.121.420.090.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene 0.090.112.120.100.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene <0.020.020.28<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 0.240.177.810.180.02 ug/g dry

Page 7 of 17

Page 47: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-15-1 TP16-15-2 TP16-16-1 TP16-17-1Sample Date: 19-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-16

1617252-09 1617252-10 1617252-11 1617252-12Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Fluorene 0.05<0.020.56<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.070.110.830.060.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene 0.03<0.020.16<0.020.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene 0.02<0.020.24<0.020.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) 0.05<0.040.40<0.040.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene 0.04<0.010.34<0.010.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 0.300.076.970.140.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 0.180.156.100.150.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl 58.2% 67.5% 47.4% [3] 36.1% [3]Surrogate

Terphenyl-d14 88.4% 89.6% 74.4% 42.3% [3]Surrogate

Page 8 of 17

Page 48: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-18-1 TPD1 TPD2 TP16-17-2Sample Date: 19-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-16

1617252-13 1617252-14 1617252-15 1617252-16Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 82.3 85.8 74.7 86.10.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -1.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 2.9 2.4 3.0 -1.0 ug/g dry

Barium 94.3 106 237 -1.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -1.0 ug/g dry

Boron 8.4 8.6 5.0 -1.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -0.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -0.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 20.9 25.4 70.3 -1.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 -0.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 7.0 7.0 15.7 -1.0 ug/g dry

Copper 39.9 15.6 40.5 -1.0 ug/g dry

Lead 30.1 18.2 62.5 -1.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 -0.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -1.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 17.0 15.4 39.3 -1.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -1.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -0.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -1.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 -1.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 29.9 32.2 71.2 -1.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 50.6 46.6 106 -1.0 ug/g dry

VolatilesBenzene <0.02 - - <0.020.02 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene <0.05 - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

Toluene <0.05 - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes <0.05 - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene <0.05 - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total <0.05 - - <0.050.05 ug/g dry

Toluene-d8 Surrogate 104% - - 104%HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) <7 - - <77 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) <4 - - <44 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 63 - - 358 ug/g dry

Page 9 of 17

Page 49: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-18-1 TPD1 TPD2 TP16-17-2Sample Date: 19-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-1619-Apr-16

1617252-13 1617252-14 1617252-15 1617252-16Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) 433 - - 306 ug/g dry

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene <0.04 [1] <0.02 0.05 -0.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene 0.06 <0.02 <0.02 -0.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 0.06 <0.02 0.12 -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene 0.11 0.03 0.31 -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene 0.16 0.04 0.36 -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.19 0.05 0.45 -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.15 0.03 0.18 -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.16 0.04 0.36 -0.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene 0.18 0.05 0.43 -0.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene <0.04 [1] <0.02 0.06 -0.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 0.26 0.09 1.23 -0.02 ug/g dry

Fluorene <0.04 [1] <0.02 0.05 -0.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.10 0.03 0.22 -0.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.04 [1] <0.02 <0.02 -0.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.04 [1] <0.02 <0.02 -0.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) <0.08 [1] <0.04 <0.04 -0.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene <0.02 [1] <0.01 <0.01 -0.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 0.16 0.05 0.51 -0.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 0.24 0.07 0.96 -0.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 78.7% 70.3% 74.1% -

Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 90.6% 87.7% 91.5% -

Page 10 of 17

Page 50: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-19-1 - - -Sample Date: ---19-Apr-16

1617252-17 - - -Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil - - -

Physical Characteristics% Solids 90.4 - - -0.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony <1.0 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Arsenic 6.9 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Barium 76.3 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Beryllium <1.0 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Boron 8.7 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Boron, available <0.5 - - -0.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium <0.5 - - -0.5 ug/g dry

Chromium 17.5 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) <0.2 - - -0.2 ug/g dry

Cobalt 10.2 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Copper 25.1 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Lead 26.8 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Mercury <0.1 - - -0.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum 2.6 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Nickel 22.6 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Selenium <1.0 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Silver <0.5 - - -0.5 ug/g dry

Thallium <1.0 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Uranium <1.0 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Vanadium 24.6 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Zinc 35.2 - - -1.0 ug/g dry

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene 0.02 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Acenaphthylene <0.02 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Anthracene 0.05 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] anthracene 0.07 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [a] pyrene 0.08 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.09 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.05 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Benzo [k] fluoranthene 0.09 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Chrysene 0.09 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene <0.02 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Fluoranthene 0.22 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Page 11 of 17

Page 51: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: TP16-19-1 - - -Sample Date: ---19-Apr-16

1617252-17 - - -Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil - - -

Fluorene 0.03 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.05 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

1-Methylnaphthalene <0.02 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

2-Methylnaphthalene <0.02 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Methylnaphthalene (1&2) <0.04 - - -0.04 ug/g dry

Naphthalene <0.01 - - -0.01 ug/g dry

Phenanthrene 0.22 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

Pyrene 0.17 - - -0.02 ug/g dry

2-Fluorobiphenyl Surrogate 71.8% - - -

Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 94.3% - - -

Page 12 of 17

Page 52: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Blank

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit UnitsSourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/gF2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 4 ug/gF3 PHCs (C16-C34) ND 8 ug/gF4 PHCs (C34-C50) ND 6 ug/g

MetalsAntimony ND 1.0 ug/gArsenic ND 1.0 ug/gBarium ND 1.0 ug/gBeryllium ND 1.0 ug/gBoron, available ND 0.5 ug/gBoron ND 1.0 ug/gCadmium ND 0.5 ug/gChromium (VI) ND 0.2 ug/gChromium ND 1.0 ug/gCobalt ND 1.0 ug/gCopper ND 1.0 ug/gLead ND 1.0 ug/gMercury ND 0.1 ug/gMolybdenum ND 1.0 ug/gNickel ND 1.0 ug/gSelenium ND 1.0 ug/gSilver ND 0.5 ug/gThallium ND 1.0 ug/gUranium ND 1.0 ug/gVanadium ND 1.0 ug/gZinc ND 1.0 ug/g

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene ND 0.02 ug/gAcenaphthylene ND 0.02 ug/gAnthracene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [a] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [a] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [b] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [g,h,i] perylene ND 0.02 ug/gBenzo [k] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gChrysene ND 0.02 ug/gDibenzo [a,h] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/gFluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/gFluorene ND 0.02 ug/gIndeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/gMethylnaphthalene (1&2) ND 0.04 ug/gNaphthalene ND 0.01 ug/gPhenanthrene ND 0.02 ug/gPyrene ND 0.02 ug/gSurrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.915 68.6 50-140ug/gSurrogate: Terphenyl-d14 1.28 96.1 50-140ug/g

VolatilesBenzene ND 0.02 ug/gEthylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/gToluene ND 0.05 ug/gm,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/go-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/gXylenes, total ND 0.05 ug/gSurrogate: Toluene-d8 8.26 103 50-140ug/g

Page 13 of 17

Page 53: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Duplicate

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit UnitsSourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 7 ug/g dry ND 40

MetalsAntimony ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Arsenic 2.44 1.0 ug/g dry 2.52 302.9Barium 109 1.0 ug/g dry 106 302.3Beryllium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Boron, available ND 0.5 ug/g dry ND 350.0Boron 8.96 1.0 ug/g dry 9.41 304.9Cadmium ND 0.5 ug/g dry ND 300.0Chromium (VI) ND 0.2 ug/g dry ND 35Chromium 27.4 1.0 ug/g dry 27.3 300.4Cobalt 7.65 1.0 ug/g dry 7.66 300.1Copper 20.7 1.0 ug/g dry 18.4 3011.6Lead 20.5 1.0 ug/g dry 19.6 304.5Mercury ND 0.1 ug/g dry ND 300.0Molybdenum ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Nickel 16.6 1.0 ug/g dry 16.9 301.4Selenium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Silver ND 0.5 ug/g dry ND 300.0Thallium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 300.0Uranium ND 1.0 ug/g dry ND 30Vanadium 33.0 1.0 ug/g dry 34.1 303.4Zinc 51.4 1.0 ug/g dry 49.6 303.6

Physical Characteristics% Solids 85.0 0.1 % by Wt. 84.3 250.7

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Acenaphthylene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Benzo [a] anthracene 0.025 0.02 ug/g dry 0.029 4015.3Benzo [a] pyrene 0.029 0.02 ug/g dry 0.036 4021.1Benzo [b] fluoranthene 0.028 0.02 ug/g dry 0.033 4018.3Benzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.020 0.02 ug/g dry 0.027 4026.5Benzo [k] fluoranthene ND 0.02 ug/g dry 0.038 400.0Chrysene 0.031 0.02 ug/g dry 0.037 4017.0Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Fluoranthene 0.071 0.02 ug/g dry 0.079 409.9Fluorene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 400.0Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene ND 0.02 ug/g dry 0.023 400.01-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 402-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 40Naphthalene ND 0.01 ug/g dry ND 400.0Phenanthrene 0.051 0.02 ug/g dry 0.047 407.7Pyrene 0.057 0.02 ug/g dry 0.064 4011.6Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 0.938 ug/g dry 59.4 50-140NDSurrogate: Terphenyl-d14 1.29 ug/g dry 81.9 50-140ND

VolatilesBenzene ND 0.02 ug/g dry ND 50Ethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Toluene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50m,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50o-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Surrogate: Toluene-d8 7.99 ug/g dry 104 50-140ND

Page 14 of 17

Page 54: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Spike

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit Units SourceResult %REC %REC

Limit RPDRPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) 189 ND 94.4 80-1207 ug/gF2 PHCs (C10-C16) 77 ND 85.2 80-1204 ug/gF3 PHCs (C16-C34) 172 ND 92.6 80-1208 ug/gF4 PHCs (C34-C50) 129 ND 104 80-1206 ug/g

MetalsAntimony 278 ND 111 70-130ug/LArsenic 297 50.3 98.6 70-130ug/LBarium 2250 2130 49.6 70-130 QM-07ug/LBeryllium 244 2.09 96.6 70-130ug/LBoron, available 4.11 ND 82.3 70-1220.5 ug/gBoron 431 188 97.2 70-130ug/LCadmium 244 3.49 96.1 70-130ug/LChromium (VI) 4.5 ND 89.5 70-1300.2 ug/gChromium 760 546 85.6 70-130ug/LCobalt 371 153 87.0 70-130ug/LCopper 598 368 91.7 70-130ug/LLead 594 391 81.1 70-130ug/LMercury 1.46 ND 97.0 70-1300.1 ug/gMolybdenum 236 5.64 92.1 70-130ug/LNickel 537 338 79.7 70-130ug/LSelenium 190 4.49 74.3 70-130ug/LSilver 224 0.36 89.5 70-130ug/LThallium 190 2.27 75.0 70-130ug/LUranium 251 ND 100 70-130ug/LVanadium 901 682 87.9 70-130ug/LZinc 1210 991 87.9 70-130ug/L

Semi-VolatilesAcenaphthene 0.202 ND 102 50-1400.02 ug/gAcenaphthylene 0.155 ND 78.3 50-1400.02 ug/gAnthracene 0.186 ND 94.1 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [a] anthracene 0.176 0.029 74.4 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [a] pyrene 0.208 0.036 87.0 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [b] fluoranthene 0.212 0.033 90.2 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [g,h,i] perylene 0.211 0.027 93.3 50-1400.02 ug/gBenzo [k] fluoranthene 0.238 0.038 101 50-1400.02 ug/gChrysene 0.235 0.037 101 50-1400.02 ug/gDibenzo [a,h] anthracene 0.197 ND 99.7 50-1400.02 ug/gFluoranthene 0.316 0.079 120 50-1400.02 ug/gFluorene 0.181 ND 91.4 50-1400.02 ug/gIndeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene 0.215 0.023 96.9 50-1400.02 ug/g1-Methylnaphthalene 0.227 ND 115 50-1400.02 ug/g2-Methylnaphthalene 0.242 ND 122 50-1400.02 ug/gNaphthalene 0.204 ND 103 50-1400.01 ug/gPhenanthrene 0.288 0.047 122 50-1400.02 ug/gPyrene 0.284 0.064 111 50-1400.02 ug/gSurrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 1.08 68.3 50-140ug/g

VolatilesBenzene 4.03 ND 101 60-1300.02 ug/gEthylbenzene 3.23 ND 80.8 60-1300.05 ug/gToluene 3.39 ND 84.6 60-1300.05 ug/gm,p-Xylenes 6.99 ND 87.4 60-1300.05 ug/g

Page 15 of 17

Page 55: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Spike

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit Units SourceResult %REC %REC

Limit RPDRPDLimit Notes

o-Xylene 3.28 ND 82.1 60-1300.05 ug/g

Page 16 of 17

Page 56: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617252

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

 Qualifier Notes :

Sample Qualifiers :

Elevated detection limits due to the nature of the sample matrix. :1

The surrogate recovery for this sample is outside of established control limits due to a sample matrix effect. :3

 QC Qualifiers :

The spike recovery was outside acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD. The batch was accepted based on other acceptable QC.

QM-07 :

 Sample Data RevisionsNone

 Work Order Revisions  /  Comments :

None

 Other Report Notes :

MDL: Method Detection Limit

n/a: not applicable

Source Result: Data used as source for matrix and duplicate samples%REC: Percent recovery.RPD: Relative percent difference.

ND: Not Detected

Soil results are reported on a dry weight basis when the units are denoted with 'dry'.Where %Solids is reported, moisture loss includes the loss of volatile hydrocarbons.

CCME PHC additional information:

- The method for the analysis of PHCs complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory. All prescribed quality criteria identified in the method has been met.- F1 range corrected for BTEX.- F2 to F3 ranges corrected for appropriate PAHs where available.

- In the case where F4 and F4G are both reported, the greater of the two results is to be used for comparison to CWS PHC criteria.- The gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons (F4G) are not to be added to C6 to C50 hydrocarbons.

Page 17 of 17

Page 57: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site
Page 58: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site
Page 59: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

www.paracellabs.com1-800-749-1947

Ottawa, ON, K1G 4J8300 - 2319 St. Laurent Blvd

Attn: Sean SterlingOttawa, ON K1R 1A2Suite 200, 1 Raymond St.Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Certificate of Analysis

This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted:

Paracel ID Client ID

Order #: 1617255Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016 Client PO:

Custody: 28887 Project: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

1617255-01 Comp1

Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising, shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under any circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work.

Lab SupervisorMark Foto, M.Sc.

Approved By:

Page 1 of 7

Page 60: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617255

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Analysis Summary TableAnalysis Method Reference/Description Extraction Date Analysis Date

EPA 6020 - Digestion - ICP-MS 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16Metals, ICP-MSMOE E3015- Auto Colour 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16REG 558 - CyanideEPA 340.2 - ISE 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16REG 558 - FluorideEPA 7470A - Cold Vapour AA 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16REG 558 - Mercury by CVAAEPA 300.1 - IC 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16REG 558 - NO3/NO2EPA 625 - GC-MS 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16REG 558 - PAHsGravimetric, calculation 21-Apr-16 21-Apr-16Solids, %

Page 2 of 7

Page 61: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617255

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Client ID: Comp1 - - -Sample Date: ---19-Apr-16

1617255-01 - - -Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil - - -

Physical Characteristics% Solids ---85.00.1 % by Wt.

EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate InorganicsArsenic ---<0.050.05 mg/L

Barium ---0.580.05 mg/L

Boron ---0.060.05 mg/L

Cadmium ---<0.010.01 mg/L

Chromium ---<0.050.05 mg/L

Lead ---<0.050.05 mg/L

Mercury ---<0.0050.005 mg/L

Selenium ---<0.050.05 mg/L

Silver ---<0.050.05 mg/L

Uranium ---<0.050.05 mg/L

Fluoride ---0.210.05 mg/L

Nitrate as N ---<11 mg/L

Nitrite as N ---<11 mg/L

Cyanide, free ---<0.020.02 mg/L

EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate OrganicsBenzo [a] pyrene ---<0.00010.0001 mg/L

Terphenyl-d14 Surrogate 107% - - -

Page 3 of 7

Page 62: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617255

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Blank

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit UnitsSourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate InorganicsArsenic ND 0.05 mg/LBarium ND 0.05 mg/LBoron ND 0.05 mg/LCadmium ND 0.01 mg/LChromium ND 0.05 mg/LLead ND 0.05 mg/LMercury ND 0.005 mg/LSelenium ND 0.05 mg/LSilver ND 0.05 mg/LUranium ND 0.05 mg/LFluoride ND 0.05 mg/LNitrate as N ND 1 mg/LNitrite as N ND 1 mg/LCyanide, free ND 0.02 mg/L

EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate OrganicsBenzo [a] pyrene ND 0.0001 mg/LSurrogate: Terphenyl-d14 0.224 112 37.1-155.6mg/L

Page 4 of 7

Page 63: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617255

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Duplicate

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit UnitsSourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate InorganicsArsenic ND 0.05 mg/L ND 290.0Barium 0.601 0.05 mg/L 0.583 343.1Boron ND 0.05 mg/L 0.055 330.0Cadmium ND 0.01 mg/L ND 330.0Chromium ND 0.05 mg/L ND 320.0Lead ND 0.05 mg/L ND 320.0Mercury ND 0.005 mg/L ND 30Selenium ND 0.05 mg/L ND 280.0Silver ND 0.05 mg/L ND 280.0Uranium ND 0.05 mg/L ND 270.0Fluoride 0.40 0.05 mg/L 0.40 200.4Nitrate as N ND 1 mg/L ND 20Nitrite as N ND 1 mg/L ND 20Cyanide, free ND 0.02 mg/L ND 200.0

Physical Characteristics% Solids 85.0 0.1 % by Wt. 84.3 250.7

Page 5 of 7

Page 64: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617255

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

Method Quality Control: Spike

Analyte ResultReporting

Limit Units SourceResult %REC %REC

Limit RPDRPDLimit Notes

EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate InorganicsArsenic 50.4 0.636 99.6 83-119ug/LBarium 106 58.3 95.3 83-116ug/LBoron 50.2 5.51 89.4 71-128ug/LCadmium 50.4 0.040 101 78-119ug/LChromium 56.3 1.83 109 80-124ug/LLead 49.1 3.62 91.0 77-126ug/LMercury 0.0297 ND 99.0 70-1300.005 mg/LSelenium 47.4 0.713 93.4 81-125ug/LSilver 48.2 0.143 96.2 70-128ug/LUranium 49.0 0.411 97.1 70-131ug/LFluoride 0.94 0.40 108 70-1300.05 mg/LNitrate as N 10 ND 99.4 81-1121 mg/LNitrite as N 10 ND 101 76-1071 mg/LCyanide, free 0.024 ND 80.3 60-1360.02 mg/L

EPA 1311 - TCLP Leachate OrganicsBenzo [a] pyrene 0.0367 ND 73.5 39-1230.0001 mg/LSurrogate: Terphenyl-d14 0.232 116 37.1-155.6mg/L

Page 6 of 7

Page 65: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site

Order #: 1617255

Project Description: 15-200-5/Mooneys Bay

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 21-Apr-2016Order Date: 20-Apr-2016

Client PO: Geofirma Engineering Ltd.

 Qualifier Notes :None

 Sample Data RevisionsNone

 Work Order Revisions  /  Comments :

None

 Other Report Notes :

MDL: Method Detection Limit

n/a: not applicable

Source Result: Data used as source for matrix and duplicate samples%REC: Percent recovery.RPD: Relative percent difference.

ND: Not Detected

Soil results are reported on a dry weight basis when the units are denoted with 'dry'.Where %Solids is reported, moisture loss includes the loss of volatile hydrocarbons.

Page 7 of 7

Page 66: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site
Page 67: Revision: 0 (Final) - Riverside Parkriversidepark.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/15-200-8_Soil... · 2 (50,000 ft 2) playground on part of Mooney’s Bay Park. Location of the site